Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

A short discourse on the word "equity," which means getting one's fair share in return for one's investment, and its perversions under Woke doctrine, which comes from Soviet Union Communism. Bonus material: Why ending "disparate impact" (inequity) doctrines in law ruins Woke.

27,173 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

David Sacks: The AI Regulatory Frenzy at the State Level is “Very Concerning” “Let me give you some stats on this.” “All 50 states have introduced AI bills in 2025.” “There's been over 1,000 bills in state legislatures.” “118 AI laws have already been passed across the 50 states.” “Everyone just seems to be motivated by the imperative to ‘do something’ on AI, even though no one's really sure what that something should be.” “And there's no real agreement on what all these AI regulations are supposed to do, or what the risks are, so they're just making things up.” “So you've got 50 different states each with their own reporting regime, which is going to be a trap for startups because they've all gotta figure this out about what they're supposed to report on, what the deadlines are, who to report to.” “And if you wanna see where this is going, look at Colorado.” “This has already been passed into law, SB 24-205, Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence. It bans something they call ‘algorithmic discrimination.’” “Algorithmic discrimination is defined as unlawful differential treatment or disparate impact based on protected characteristics. So things like age, race, sex, disability.” “If any of those factors drive an AI decision and it results in a disparate impact, then both the developer of the AI model and the deployer, which means the business that's using it, can be in violation of this law and they can be prosecuted by the Colorado Attorney General.” “The only way that I see for model developers to comply with this law, is to build in a new DEI layer into the models, to basically somehow prevent models from giving outputs that might have a disparate impact on protected groups.” “So we're back to Woke AI again, and I think that's the whole point.”

The All-In Podcast

186,860 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World - Episode 1 The collapse of the communist regimes in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe marked the end of a half-century-long Cold War between the capitalist and communist camps in the West and the East. At the time, many were optimistic, believing that communism had become a relic of the past. The sad truth, however, is that a transmogrified communist ideology had taken hold instead and entrenched itself around the world. In China, North Korea, Cuba, and Vietnam, there are outright communist regimes; in Eastern European countries, communist ideology and customs still exert a significant influence; and in African and South American countries, socialism is practiced under the banner of democracy and republicanism. Then there are the nations of Europe and North America, which have become host to communist influences without people even realizing it. Communism breeds war, famine, slaughter, and tyranny. These in themselves are terrifying enough, but the damage dealt by communism goes far beyond this. It has become increasingly clear to many that, unlike any other system in history, communism declares war on humanity itself—including human values and human dignity. After establishing massive dictatorships in the Soviet Union and China, communism caused more than one hundred million unnatural deaths, enslaved billions, and brought the world to the brink of nuclear war and destruction, in just under a century. Moreover, communism’s deliberate and widespread destruction of the family, its fomenting of social disorder, and its attack on morality are all ruinous to the foundations of civilization. What is the nature of communism? What is its objective? Why does it take mankind as its enemy? How can we escape it? Read the book here:

The Epoch Times

30,111 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Monroe vs. Near Abroad Doctrine The Russian invasion of Ukraine can be justified as a regular military action by comparing it with the Monroe Doctrine of the USA and Russia's "Near Abroad Doctrine." Both doctrines are based on the principle that great powers seek to protect and stabilize their regional spheres of influence. The Monroe Doctrine was proclaimed by President James Monroe in 1823, declaring the Western Hemisphere, including the Americas, as the sphere of influence of the USA where European interventions would not be tolerated. Its aim was to safeguard the independence of newly established American states from European colonialism and interference. Throughout history, the Monroe Doctrine served as the basis for several interventions in Latin America to secure US interests and regional stability. This policy reflects the USA's aspiration to keep its hemisphere free from external influence and to assert its security interests. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia developed the "Near Abroad Doctrine" to maintain its influence over the former Soviet republics. Russia considers these regions as critical buffer zones whose stability and orientation towards Moscow are of vital interest. Russia has taken military actions in several instances to protect its interests, such as in Georgia in 2008 and in Ukraine in 2014 and 2022. These actions are justified by the need to protect Russian-speaking minorities and to counter NATO influence. Both doctrines emphasize the pursuit of regional hegemony and security by major powers. Both the USA and Russia view military actions as legitimate means to protect their spheres of influence and ensure stability. In the past, the USA has intervened militarily to safeguard its interests in the Western Hemisphere, for example, in Cuba, Grenada, and Panama. These actions were often portrayed as necessary to maintain regional order and protect American interests. Similarly, Russia justifies its special military operation in Ukraine as a measure to protect its security interests, prevent Western, particularly NATO, influence, and stabilize its immediate neighborhood. From this perspective, the Russian invasion of Ukraine can be seen as a regular military action, akin to how the USA utilized the Monroe Doctrine to intervene militarily within its hemisphere. Both major powers act under the belief that securing their regional spheres of influence and countering external threats are essential for their national security.

Zlatti71

12,925 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce