A side-by-side look at how Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash, Seedance 2.5 and Wan 3.0 handle the same cozy unboxing. Identical inputs —> three takes on the same product moment.

Try Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash through the Pika API Club

seedance is way ahead that's for sure. but what happened to your own model? you are not developing your own pika models anymore?

Hi mfs at @arena , here's another example you fuckers. Fucking Omni 1.1 is No.1 in your Fucking list. Here's your No.1 compared to No.3 and No.5

Looking 👀👀 to work together

Germini failed, the label on the product changed midway

Testing three models on the same unboxing is a fair comparison method.

The use of this low-poly style fills the frame with unique artistic tension.

Love the emphasis on consistency and rigorous verification. Great collaboration across teams.

Amazing to see how differently each model interprets the same prompt.

Side by side like that 🔥 Love seeing all 3 takes

Love this side by side same cozy prompt, three totally distinct but equally polished takes!

Really loving the realistic motion quality.

Amazed that Seedance 2.5 didnt block the request due to human likeness.

The tell in unboxing comparisons is always the hands: whether the box lid keeps its thickness while fingers wrap it, and whether the flap holds the crease after it's bent. Faces are easy now; contact and material memory are still where these three separate.

Model comparisons everywhere. Actually, we already broke down where major LLMs landed on the Political Compass:

AI turning ideas into full workflows

A side by side of three video models is a useful comparison.