正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Google DeepMind Just tested Gemini Omni Flash against Seedance 2.0 right after the launch 👀 We ran the same prompts side-by-side to compare real generation quality, motion, and consistency. Sharing the results here ↓

TopviewAI

5,822 subscribers

24,787 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Seedance 2.0 vs Omni Flash 🥊 Ngl, this side-by-side comparison is kinda wild. I took the exact same storyboard and ran it through both models to see how they handle movement and consistency. 🎨 Storyboard: GPT Image 2 🎬 Animation: Seedance 2.0 (Top) vs Omni Flash (Bottom) Tbh both models popped off, but the vibes are totally different. Are you team 🐶 (Seedance) or team 🐱 (Omni)? Let’s settle this in the replies! 👇 (Dropping the exact prompts in the thread 🧵)

Seedance 2.0 vs Omni Flash 🥊 Ngl, this side-by-side comparison is kinda wild. I took the exact same storyboard and ran it through both models to see how they handle movement and consistency. 🎨 Storyboard: GPT Image 2 🎬 Animation: Seedance 2.0 (Top) vs Omni Flash (Bottom) Tbh both models popped off, but the vibes are totally different. Are you team 🐶 (Seedance) or team 🐱 (Omni)? Let’s settle this in the replies! 👇 (Dropping the exact prompts in the thread 🧵)

Ivanna | AI Art & Prompts

23,642 次观看 • 2 个月前

Google promised that Gemini Omni Flash would change the game, but when you put it side-by-side with Seedance 2.0... it’s not even a fair fight. Fingers crossed for Veo4

Google promised that Gemini Omni Flash would change the game, but when you put it side-by-side with Seedance 2.0... it’s not even a fair fight. Fingers crossed for Veo4

JSFILMZ

549,752 次观看 • 2 个月前

Same prompt. Same story. Two models. One intense car chase. I put Seedance 2.0 and Seedance 2.5 on CapCut through the exact same 30-second Hollywood style chase sequence to compare vehicle physics, camera stability, motion blur, character consistency, dialogue, and overall cinematic realism. No prompt changes. No shortcuts. Just a direct side-by-side test to see how much the generation quality has evolved. Which version feels more realistic to you? CapCut

Same prompt. Same story. Two models. One intense car chase. I put Seedance 2.0 and Seedance 2.5 on CapCut through the exact same 30-second Hollywood style chase sequence to compare vehicle physics, camera stability, motion blur, character consistency, dialogue, and overall cinematic realism. No prompt changes. No shortcuts. Just a direct side-by-side test to see how much the generation quality has evolved. Which version feels more realistic to you? CapCut

Natalia

35,753 次观看 • 5 天前

Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni, tested under the same conditions 👀 I was working on a new storyboard. After generating it with Seedance 2.0, I gave the exact same prompt + storyboard reference + character reference to Gemini Omni as well. Result: Gemini Omni surprised me with style quality and got closer than I expected in prompt adherence. But Seedance still feels ahead for storyboard execution, motion energy, camera language and environmental interaction. Gemini looks good. Seedance feels directed. You can see them in the video and the storyboard sheet is shown at the end. Which one do you think is more useful for this kind of work?

Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni, tested under the same conditions 👀 I was working on a new storyboard. After generating it with Seedance 2.0, I gave the exact same prompt + storyboard reference + character reference to Gemini Omni as well. Result: Gemini Omni surprised me with style quality and got closer than I expected in prompt adherence. But Seedance still feels ahead for storyboard execution, motion energy, camera language and environmental interaction. Gemini looks good. Seedance feels directed. You can see them in the video and the storyboard sheet is shown at the end. Which one do you think is more useful for this kind of work?

Kōda

35,800 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 SHOCKING: Seedance 2.5 just raised the bar for AI video. I tested the exact same prompts on Seedance 2.0 and 2.5 2.5 delivers longer 30-second scenes, cleaner motion, more realistic lighting, and much stronger character consistency. Here is the breakdown (with examples)🧵:

🚨 SHOCKING: Seedance 2.5 just raised the bar for AI video. I tested the exact same prompts on Seedance 2.0 and 2.5 2.5 delivers longer 30-second scenes, cleaner motion, more realistic lighting, and much stronger character consistency. Here is the breakdown (with examples)🧵:

Jaynit Makwana

29,223 次观看 • 6 天前

Mini AI video models usually come with an obvious tradeoff. You get faster generation and lower cost, but the output often starts to look compromised: weaker motion, softer details, flatter lighting, and less cinematic control. So we tested Dreamina Seedance 2.0 mini side by side against Dreamina Seedance 2.0 to see how much of that tradeoff actually shows up in the final render. Officially launched by ByteDance's official product Dreamina: Dreamina Seedance 2.0 mini! Delivers on-par performance with Dreamina Seedance 2.0, but at a lower cost and faster speed.

Mini AI video models usually come with an obvious tradeoff. You get faster generation and lower cost, but the output often starts to look compromised: weaker motion, softer details, flatter lighting, and less cinematic control. So we tested Dreamina Seedance 2.0 mini side by side against Dreamina Seedance 2.0 to see how much of that tradeoff actually shows up in the final render. Officially launched by ByteDance's official product Dreamina: Dreamina Seedance 2.0 mini! Delivers on-par performance with Dreamina Seedance 2.0, but at a lower cost and faster speed.

GitHub Projects Community

26,029 次观看 • 1 个月前

Introducing Gemini 2.0 Flash with Google AI Studio in PyCharm... Totally Free! 🤩 In just one minute, I'll show you how to connect your Google AI Studio account and start using the Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking models for free. Save this video to stay updated on all the latest Google DeepMind models available in JetBrains editors! PyCharm, a JetBrains IDE CodeGPT Google for Developers

Introducing Gemini 2.0 Flash with Google AI Studio in PyCharm... Totally Free! 🤩 In just one minute, I'll show you how to connect your Google AI Studio account and start using the Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking models for free. Save this video to stay updated on all the latest Google DeepMind models available in JetBrains editors! PyCharm, a JetBrains IDE CodeGPT Google for Developers

Daniel San

65,294 次观看 • 1 年前

SEEDANCE 2.5 SIDE BY SIDE WITH 2.0 same prompt, same scene, completely different result. 2.0 already looked good, 2.5 looks like a different generation of tech. 7 days of unlimited Seedance 2.0 in 4K, the most premium Seedance model, then switch to Seedance 2.5 for 7 more days. Seedance 2.5 coming soon on Higgsfield.

SEEDANCE 2.5 SIDE BY SIDE WITH 2.0 same prompt, same scene, completely different result. 2.0 already looked good, 2.5 looks like a different generation of tech. 7 days of unlimited Seedance 2.0 in 4K, the most premium Seedance model, then switch to Seedance 2.5 for 7 more days. Seedance 2.5 coming soon on Higgsfield.

marcus

68,861 次观看 • 12 天前

We were able to sit down with the Google DeepMind team behind the new Gemini Omni Flash model to hear all of their behind-the-scenes stories, memorable moments, and many, many (occasionally embarrassing) video generations. Watch the full Release Notes episode here:

We were able to sit down with the Google DeepMind team behind the new Gemini Omni Flash model to hear all of their behind-the-scenes stories, memorable moments, and many, many (occasionally embarrassing) video generations. Watch the full Release Notes episode here:

Google AI

13,118,427 次观看 • 2 个月前

👨‍💻Have you tested models in the new Code Arena yet? In this thread, we’re showcasing real Gemini 3 Pro by Google DeepMind creations and the exact prompts used, all of them built inside the Code Arena. You can directly compare Gemini’s outputs against other top frontier models on real web development tasks. Build, compare, vote, and share your own creations directly from the chat. See examples in the thread. 🧵

👨‍💻Have you tested models in the new Code Arena yet? In this thread, we’re showcasing real Gemini 3 Pro by Google DeepMind creations and the exact prompts used, all of them built inside the Code Arena. You can directly compare Gemini’s outputs against other top frontier models on real web development tasks. Build, compare, vote, and share your own creations directly from the chat. See examples in the thread. 🧵

Arena.ai

25,393 次观看 • 8 个月前

Tested the exact same prompt on Seedance 2.0 vs. Omni Flash, and the results are wild. 🤯 Both have their weird little AI mutations (we all know the struggle lol), but the biggest shocker? Omni Flash generated this instantly with zero censorship, while Seedance 2.0 threw a fit and tried to ban the prompt. 💀 Dropping the exact prompt in the thread below 👇 Next up, I’m gonna push them harder with some crazy dynamic animation. Which model do you think won this round? tbh I’m torn.

Tested the exact same prompt on Seedance 2.0 vs. Omni Flash, and the results are wild. 🤯 Both have their weird little AI mutations (we all know the struggle lol), but the biggest shocker? Omni Flash generated this instantly with zero censorship, while Seedance 2.0 threw a fit and tried to ban the prompt. 💀 Dropping the exact prompt in the thread below 👇 Next up, I’m gonna push them harder with some crazy dynamic animation. Which model do you think won this round? tbh I’m torn.

Ivanna | AI Art & Prompts

38,463 次观看 • 2 个月前

Love this example! Congrats to Google DeepMind! I successfully replicated the Boggle game on SWE Arena. TLDR: Gemini 2.0 Pro won! In the case of Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.0 Pro, both are given the image and prompt to generate the algo to get the results. The image and prompt are exactly the same. Try it out on SWE Arena: BTW can we get a bigger streaming rate limit for our API, so that ppl can better compare the latest Gemini models with other frontier models? Jeff Dean Logan Kilpatrick 👀

Love this example! Congrats to Google DeepMind! I successfully replicated the Boggle game on SWE Arena. TLDR: Gemini 2.0 Pro won! In the case of Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.0 Pro, both are given the image and prompt to generate the algo to get the results. The image and prompt are exactly the same. Try it out on SWE Arena: BTW can we get a bigger streaming rate limit for our API, so that ppl can better compare the latest Gemini models with other frontier models? Jeff Dean Logan Kilpatrick 👀

Terry Yue Zhuo

48,220 次观看 • 1 年前

My Final Verdict. Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Gemini Omni Flash. Gemini Omni Flash just doesn't have a place in my workflow. Beyond the frustrating 10-second limit and heavy censorship flags, the style transfers completely break character consistency—with the likeness drifting hard and even changing my characters' race to Caucasian. The only real positive here is that generation speed is fast. Fingers crossed for what Google does next with Veo 4. Yeah, I understand going against the grain probably means my work won’t get featured by Google or pushed by the people who want everything to sound positive. But I’ve always chosen integrity over access or boost. If something works, I’ll say it works. If something breaks, I’ll show that too. I’d rather be honest with the people watching than pretend everything is perfect just to stay in good standing with big tech. Full verdict in the reply👇

My Final Verdict. Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Gemini Omni Flash. Gemini Omni Flash just doesn't have a place in my workflow. Beyond the frustrating 10-second limit and heavy censorship flags, the style transfers completely break character consistency—with the likeness drifting hard and even changing my characters' race to Caucasian. The only real positive here is that generation speed is fast. Fingers crossed for what Google does next with Veo 4. Yeah, I understand going against the grain probably means my work won’t get featured by Google or pushed by the people who want everything to sound positive. But I’ve always chosen integrity over access or boost. If something works, I’ll say it works. If something breaks, I’ll show that too. I’d rather be honest with the people watching than pretend everything is perfect just to stay in good standing with big tech. Full verdict in the reply👇

JSFILMZ

55,255 次观看 • 2 个月前

We put Tiana’s side by side with Splash to compare the two! Watch the full video here:

We put Tiana’s side by side with Splash to compare the two! Watch the full video here:

Attractions Magazine

150,018 次观看 • 2 年前

to the people asking for the “old bts” back..literally watch danger and 2.0 MV side by side. SAME VIBE, SAME ENERGY, NO ROOTS LOST HERE

to the people asking for the “old bts” back..literally watch danger and 2.0 MV side by side. SAME VIBE, SAME ENERGY, NO ROOTS LOST HERE

chan⁷ is seeing BTS

228,125 次观看 • 4 个月前

Omni from Google DeepMind just dropped 👀 It's a big step forward in video generation when it comes to character consistency, world knowledge, and editing. I've been testing it for the last few days - and I'm excited to walk through some of the key features + my clips 👇

Omni from Google DeepMind just dropped 👀 It's a big step forward in video generation when it comes to character consistency, world knowledge, and editing. I've been testing it for the last few days - and I'm excited to walk through some of the key features + my clips 👇

Justine Moore

85,336 次观看 • 2 个月前

We've been testing Gemini 3 for the past few weeks, and here's what stands out: It's faster, the tool calling is sharper, and the UI taste is finally dialed in. In this test, we gave Gemini 3 (left side) and Gemini 2.5 (right side) the same tasks and see the difference in the results.

We've been testing Gemini 3 for the past few weeks, and here's what stands out: It's faster, the tool calling is sharper, and the UI taste is finally dialed in. In this test, we gave Gemini 3 (left side) and Gemini 2.5 (right side) the same tasks and see the difference in the results.

Cline

31,447 次观看 • 8 个月前

Flova now integrates Seedance 2.0 — unlocking next-level AI video creation. With Seedance 2.0, you get: • High-quality, long-form video generation • Strong motion consistency and cinematic output • Faster generation with significantly improved efficiency Flova also introduces a new Quick Access feature — instantly launch Seedance 2.0 or even NanoBanana with just one click. No complex setup, no prompt engineering required. And the best part? Lower cost, higher value — create more, spend less. #Flovaai #Seedance #aivideo

Flova now integrates Seedance 2.0 — unlocking next-level AI video creation. With Seedance 2.0, you get: • High-quality, long-form video generation • Strong motion consistency and cinematic output • Faster generation with significantly improved efficiency Flova also introduces a new Quick Access feature — instantly launch Seedance 2.0 or even NanoBanana with just one click. No complex setup, no prompt engineering required. And the best part? Lower cost, higher value — create more, spend less. #Flovaai #Seedance #aivideo

FlovaAI

475,640 次观看 • 4 个月前

I tested Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0. The winner was obvious. Same prompt, same reference image, one scene: a boy rescuing his dog from an oncoming car. Seedance 2.0 came out ahead across the board: · Better character consistency — the boy's face and expression stayed recognizable through fast, dynamic motion. · More coherent physics — when the boy dives to save the dog, he actually lands on the other side of the road. In Kling 3.0, they just drop in place, which breaks the logic of the scene. · More natural motion — fluid movements without the exaggerated, theatrical quality that plagues most AI video. · Richer cinematic language — varied shot compositions including close-ups, camera transitions, and framing shifts that actively reinforce emotion and narrative tension. The gap suggests Seedance 2.0's training leans heavier into film language, not just motion synthesis.

I tested Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0. The winner was obvious. Same prompt, same reference image, one scene: a boy rescuing his dog from an oncoming car. Seedance 2.0 came out ahead across the board: · Better character consistency — the boy's face and expression stayed recognizable through fast, dynamic motion. · More coherent physics — when the boy dives to save the dog, he actually lands on the other side of the road. In Kling 3.0, they just drop in place, which breaks the logic of the scene. · More natural motion — fluid movements without the exaggerated, theatrical quality that plagues most AI video. · Richer cinematic language — varied shot compositions including close-ups, camera transitions, and framing shifts that actively reinforce emotion and narrative tension. The gap suggests Seedance 2.0's training leans heavier into film language, not just motion synthesis.

Latte

167,558 次观看 • 6 个月前