Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

A surprising comparison between Seedance 2.0 & 2.5 I generated two 10-second videos with each model. What do you think? Extensive cinematic test of Seedance 2.5 in the quote 👇 Prompt: A colossal giant appears, striding through a lake; the ground shakes with every step, sending massive amounts of... show more

hedoήist

23,194 subscribers

11,735 views • 3 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

hedoήist

43,612 views • 4 months ago

SEEDANCE 2.5 SIDE BY SIDE WITH 2.0 same prompt, same scene, completely different result. 2.0 already looked good, 2.5 looks like a different generation of tech. 7 days of unlimited Seedance 2.0 in 4K, the most premium Seedance model, then switch to Seedance 2.5 for 7 more days. Seedance 2.5 coming soon on Higgsfield.

SEEDANCE 2.5 SIDE BY SIDE WITH 2.0 same prompt, same scene, completely different result. 2.0 already looked good, 2.5 looks like a different generation of tech. 7 days of unlimited Seedance 2.0 in 4K, the most premium Seedance model, then switch to Seedance 2.5 for 7 more days. Seedance 2.5 coming soon on Higgsfield.

marcus

68,652 views • 3 days ago

Seedance 2.5 First Test Something feels a little off but I'm not entirely sure what it is. Seedance 2.0 wasn't like this. It seems to morph a bit during fast action scenes. It’s a really expensive model to test, so we'll see how many attempts we can make. Being able to generate a full 30-second video in one go is nice. In this video, one of the guns disappears and then comes back.

Seedance 2.5 First Test Something feels a little off but I'm not entirely sure what it is. Seedance 2.0 wasn't like this. It seems to morph a bit during fast action scenes. It’s a really expensive model to test, so we'll see how many attempts we can make. Being able to generate a full 30-second video in one go is nice. In this video, one of the guns disappears and then comes back.

Kōda

35,395 views • 3 days ago

My first test of Seedance 2.5! ❤️‍🔥 conclusions: Resolution and realistic quality have improved significantly. The sound is clean and cinematic. Using a 30-second duration is risky. When you ask for many specific elements within 30 seconds, you increase the likelihood of errors. I used a prompt with eight references, and it couldn't capture all eight references within the 30-second timeframe. I created it with CapCut Main prompt in the comments.

My first test of Seedance 2.5! ❤️‍🔥 conclusions: Resolution and realistic quality have improved significantly. The sound is clean and cinematic. Using a 30-second duration is risky. When you ask for many specific elements within 30 seconds, you increase the likelihood of errors. I used a prompt with eight references, and it couldn't capture all eight references within the 30-second timeframe. I created it with CapCut Main prompt in the comments.

hedoήist

26,188 views • 4 days ago

Create amazing action scenes with Seedance 2.0! First, create your character sheet with ChatGPT Images 2.0, then bring it to Seedance 2.0 as a reference image. Prompt your scene and what happens, referencing the character. More details + prompts below.

Create amazing action scenes with Seedance 2.0! First, create your character sheet with ChatGPT Images 2.0, then bring it to Seedance 2.0 as a reference image. Prompt your scene and what happens, referencing the character. More details + prompts below.

Jerrod Lew

15,877 views • 2 months ago

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 11. Cinematic Camera Angles through Video Gen + Specialized Storyboard AI Agent Are you already getting camera shots and angles through Nano Banana Pro? Take the next step. Seedance 2.0 has a better spatial understanding of the scene than image generation models. Because it is built to produce cinematic clips, it achieves more beautiful shots and angles than image models like Nano Banana, which are primarily made for image editing. As an added bonus, Seedance renders the entire space of the scene, so you can get tens of shots with complete spatial and element consistency in a single generation. Create a specific AI Agent to help you with storyboarding, and feed the input into Seedance to get the most cinematic shots. You can access Seedance 2.0 now on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts👇

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 11. Cinematic Camera Angles through Video Gen + Specialized Storyboard AI Agent Are you already getting camera shots and angles through Nano Banana Pro? Take the next step. Seedance 2.0 has a better spatial understanding of the scene than image generation models. Because it is built to produce cinematic clips, it achieves more beautiful shots and angles than image models like Nano Banana, which are primarily made for image editing. As an added bonus, Seedance renders the entire space of the scene, so you can get tens of shots with complete spatial and element consistency in a single generation. Create a specific AI Agent to help you with storyboarding, and feed the input into Seedance to get the most cinematic shots. You can access Seedance 2.0 now on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts👇

VoxelPlot

125,794 views • 2 months ago

Classic moments. Now within reach. We’re sharing a story with Michael Owen , using Seedance 2.5 to revisit some of the defining moments of his legendary career. From signature moves on the pitch to limitless creative possibilities, Seedance 2.5 pushes the boundaries of what AI video creation can achieve. Unlock the impossible.

Classic moments. Now within reach. We’re sharing a story with Michael Owen , using Seedance 2.5 to revisit some of the defining moments of his legendary career. From signature moves on the pitch to limitless creative possibilities, Seedance 2.5 pushes the boundaries of what AI video creation can achieve. Unlock the impossible.

BytePlus

13,280,699 views • 20 days ago

None of this is real. Every shot, every angle, every detail of the necklace -all Al. Here is what you need: Use ChatGPT to create a visual storyboard and video generation prompt Generate cinematic footage with Seedance 2.0 CapCut for editing Full Prompt in the comment

None of this is real. Every shot, every angle, every detail of the necklace -all Al. Here is what you need: Use ChatGPT to create a visual storyboard and video generation prompt Generate cinematic footage with Seedance 2.0 CapCut for editing Full Prompt in the comment

FATHELA ESQ

37,568 views • 1 month ago

Amazing comparison! 🤯 What do you think? Test: -Kling 3.0 -Seedance 2.0 -Grok 1.0 There's one clear winner. Kling - has an acceptable result, but it doesn't depict rain well, and the orc isn't riding the bull. Seedance - is simply incredible in battles. Totally cinematic. Grok - Grok's improvement with elements is extraordinary; it has a promising future. If you have any questions about how to create this, ask in the comments.

Amazing comparison! 🤯 What do you think? Test: -Kling 3.0 -Seedance 2.0 -Grok 1.0 There's one clear winner. Kling - has an acceptable result, but it doesn't depict rain well, and the orc isn't riding the bull. Seedance - is simply incredible in battles. Totally cinematic. Grok - Grok's improvement with elements is extraordinary; it has a promising future. If you have any questions about how to create this, ask in the comments.

hedoήist

43,707 views • 4 months ago

$i just figured out the best way to use Seedance 2.5 latest model from ByteDance lets you generate up to 30 second continuous videos and accepts up to 50 reference assets (images, videos and audio) all in one generation most people overcomplicate it, the real trick is in the details my prompt structure looks like this: [1] global scene + visual style [2] character descriptions [3] timestamped storyboard (0-5s, 5-10s, 10-15s...) [4] camera movement [5] negative prompts [6] ending constraints for example, instead of saying: "girl doing her skincare routine with x product" you tell it exactly what happens every few seconds, where the camera moves, how the emotion changes, what should never appear i put together the exact framework i use and leaking it all to you right now here's what you're getting: > the prompt formula for 30-second videos > how to Use Seedance 2.5 at a fraction of the cost > the best way to use reference images/videos > transitions, camera movements and negative prompts RT + reply "SEEDANCE" and i'll send it over (must follow so i can dm)$

i just figured out the best way to use Seedance 2.5 latest model from ByteDance lets you generate up to 30 second continuous videos and accepts up to 50 reference assets (images, videos and audio) all in one generation most people overcomplicate it, the real trick is in the details my prompt structure looks like this: [1] global scene + visual style [2] character descriptions [3] timestamped storyboard (0-5s, 5-10s, 10-15s...) [4] camera movement [5] negative prompts [6] ending constraints for example, instead of saying: "girl doing her skincare routine with x product" you tell it exactly what happens every few seconds, where the camera moves, how the emotion changes, what should never appear i put together the exact framework i use and leaking it all to you right now here's what you're getting: > the prompt formula for 30-second videos > how to Use Seedance 2.5 at a fraction of the cost > the best way to use reference images/videos > transitions, camera movements and negative prompts RT + reply "SEEDANCE" and i'll send it over (must follow so i can dm)

MAX

63,692 views • 1 day ago

stop prompting AI video generators with just text. it’s basically gambling. if you want actual cinematic control, you have to treat the AI like a human animation studio. exact prompt in the replies 🧵👇 Chat gpt2.0 images /midjourney v 8.1 / seedance 2.0 I wanted a 15-second noir hand-to-hand combat scene. Text-only prompt = messy slop. Visual storyboard + Seedance 2.0 = flawless choreography. Dreamina AI #DreaminaCpp

stop prompting AI video generators with just text. it’s basically gambling. if you want actual cinematic control, you have to treat the AI like a human animation studio. exact prompt in the replies 🧵👇 Chat gpt2.0 images /midjourney v 8.1 / seedance 2.0 I wanted a 15-second noir hand-to-hand combat scene. Text-only prompt = messy slop. Visual storyboard + Seedance 2.0 = flawless choreography. Dreamina AI #DreaminaCpp

Dheepan Ratnam

55,437 views • 3 months ago

I ran a quick test: I used the exact same prompt to generate videos with Seedance 2.0 and Sora 2, just to see how they differ. Sora 2 automatically adds music, which instantly makes the video feel polished. But Seedance 2.0 handles shot breakdown and pacing better, it feels more like a professionally edited sequence.

I ran a quick test: I used the exact same prompt to generate videos with Seedance 2.0 and Sora 2, just to see how they differ. Sora 2 automatically adds music, which instantly makes the video feel polished. But Seedance 2.0 handles shot breakdown and pacing better, it feels more like a professionally edited sequence.

underwood

13,972 views • 5 months ago

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Curious Refuge

58,989 views • 5 months ago

📖THE SEEDANCE 2.0 PROMPT FORMAT THAT NOBODY IS USING BUT EVERYONE SHOULD Most people use Seedance 2.0 wrong. They type a normal prompt and wonder why the result looks generic. The difference between these two visuals isn't a better idea — it's a better prompt format. Normal prompt gives you a good result. JSON prompt gives you a cinematic one. Here's why it works: A normal prompt describes what you want. A JSON prompt tells Seedance exactly how to build the scene — camera movement, lighting angle, atmosphere, texture, depth, timing. You're not asking for a video. You're engineering one. The crystal dolphin jumping above an ancient courtyard with floating jellyfish — same concept, two completely different outputs. The JSON version has golden hour, dramatic clouds, volumetric light, and a sense of scale the normal prompt never reached. The glowing lotus fountain — same story. Normal prompt gives you a clean render. JSON gives you a full cinematic frame with layered depth, warm lantern light, and a composition that looks like it belongs in a feature film. The workflow that produces this: • Step 1 — Write your scene idea in plain language first •Step 2 — Ask Claude to convert it into a structured JSON prompt with fields for: subject, environment, camera, lighting, mood, motion, color grade • Step 3 — Paste the JSON into Seedance 2.0 • Step 4 — Take the best clip into Premiere Pro for final color correction and sound design The tools are free or cheap. The knowledge of how to prompt is what separates the results. This is the gap most creators never close. 📥 BACK TOMORROW. There will be new life hacks 🔖 The full guide is pinned below. Save it before you need it.

📖THE SEEDANCE 2.0 PROMPT FORMAT THAT NOBODY IS USING BUT EVERYONE SHOULD Most people use Seedance 2.0 wrong. They type a normal prompt and wonder why the result looks generic. The difference between these two visuals isn't a better idea — it's a better prompt format. Normal prompt gives you a good result. JSON prompt gives you a cinematic one. Here's why it works: A normal prompt describes what you want. A JSON prompt tells Seedance exactly how to build the scene — camera movement, lighting angle, atmosphere, texture, depth, timing. You're not asking for a video. You're engineering one. The crystal dolphin jumping above an ancient courtyard with floating jellyfish — same concept, two completely different outputs. The JSON version has golden hour, dramatic clouds, volumetric light, and a sense of scale the normal prompt never reached. The glowing lotus fountain — same story. Normal prompt gives you a clean render. JSON gives you a full cinematic frame with layered depth, warm lantern light, and a composition that looks like it belongs in a feature film. The workflow that produces this: • Step 1 — Write your scene idea in plain language first •Step 2 — Ask Claude to convert it into a structured JSON prompt with fields for: subject, environment, camera, lighting, mood, motion, color grade • Step 3 — Paste the JSON into Seedance 2.0 • Step 4 — Take the best clip into Premiere Pro for final color correction and sound design The tools are free or cheap. The knowledge of how to prompt is what separates the results. This is the gap most creators never close. 📥 BACK TOMORROW. There will be new life hacks 🔖 The full guide is pinned below. Save it before you need it.

Zentrix⌚️

136,152 views • 1 month ago

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

Dinda Prasetyo

196,557 views • 5 months ago

I put Seedance 2.0 in native 4k to the test and.... wow. Every water droplet, every blade of grass, every strand of hair has perfect detail. I usually generate in 720p and assumed the increase in resolution wouldn't be that noticeable but have been blown away by: -Increased prompt adherence -Improved motion interpolation (no intra-frame artifacts) -Complex camera moves -Cinematic colour grading A personal favourite is the handheld vlog style camera movement seen in this clip. It's almost impossible to do with traditional stop-motion filmmaking. I think this Is where AI shines best - where it allows you to do things you just couldn't do with traditional techniques. Watch the 4k film below and let me know what you think! You can try seedance 4k for yourself with: BytePlus Lumina

I put Seedance 2.0 in native 4k to the test and.... wow. Every water droplet, every blade of grass, every strand of hair has perfect detail. I usually generate in 720p and assumed the increase in resolution wouldn't be that noticeable but have been blown away by: -Increased prompt adherence -Improved motion interpolation (no intra-frame artifacts) -Complex camera moves -Cinematic colour grading A personal favourite is the handheld vlog style camera movement seen in this clip. It's almost impossible to do with traditional stop-motion filmmaking. I think this Is where AI shines best - where it allows you to do things you just couldn't do with traditional techniques. Watch the 4k film below and let me know what you think! You can try seedance 4k for yourself with: BytePlus Lumina

Soul Motion labs

30,896 views • 1 month ago

AI filmmaking is insane! House of the Dragon reportedly costs $20 million per episode. Now you can create Hollywood-level dragon shots from your bedroom with Seedance. My workflow: 1. Make a start frame in Midjourney 2. Block-out in Blender, animate the camera 3. Feed both to Seedance You can build a whole cinematic universe from a handful of blocks.

AI filmmaking is insane! House of the Dragon reportedly costs $20 million per episode. Now you can create Hollywood-level dragon shots from your bedroom with Seedance. My workflow: 1. Make a start frame in Midjourney 2. Block-out in Blender, animate the camera 3. Feed both to Seedance You can build a whole cinematic universe from a handful of blocks.

Reid Hannaford

122,819 views • 28 days ago

Elon Musk on Starship “This is the largest flying object ever made. So, to catch it with giant robot arms and pluck it out of the sky is pretty insane, but I think it's got a decent chance of working. It might take a few kicks at the can before it works. But we're not breaking physics, so success is one of the possible outcomes here.”

Elon Musk on Starship “This is the largest flying object ever made. So, to catch it with giant robot arms and pluck it out of the sky is pretty insane, but I think it's got a decent chance of working. It might take a few kicks at the can before it works. But we're not breaking physics, so success is one of the possible outcomes here.”

Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

1,245,267 views • 1 year ago

GPT 2 Images X Seedance 2.0 Animation with 30 second storyboard Don’t ask AI to “make a video.”Give it a production board. image/video Prompts and guide in the thread🧵 I made a 30-second animated video from a short sentence using only 3 steps: The trick is simple: Start with a short story, then turn both parts into one clean cinematic storyboard. Animate with seedance 2.0

GPT 2 Images X Seedance 2.0 Animation with 30 second storyboard Don’t ask AI to “make a video.”Give it a production board. image/video Prompts and guide in the thread🧵 I made a 30-second animated video from a short sentence using only 3 steps: The trick is simple: Start with a short story, then turn both parts into one clean cinematic storyboard. Animate with seedance 2.0

Dheepan Ratnam

68,479 views • 2 months ago

Seedance 2.0 vs Meta Muse Video. Both models feature native audio, but Muse Video seems like its currently stuck with a 10-second limit. Meanwhile, Seedance 2.0 can output 15-second cinematic sequences in crisp up to 4K. Meta is cooking, but Seedance 2.0 might still hold the crown for now. Which one are you betting on?

Seedance 2.0 vs Meta Muse Video. Both models feature native audio, but Muse Video seems like its currently stuck with a 10-second limit. Meanwhile, Seedance 2.0 can output 15-second cinematic sequences in crisp up to 4K. Meta is cooking, but Seedance 2.0 might still hold the crown for now. Which one are you betting on?

JSFILMZ

173,325 views • 26 days ago