Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a...

44,077 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 49

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

video prompt: A close-up shot follows a ship flies and flapping dynamically through a colossal landscape with giant arches, clouds, and storms, with crystal-clear water below. splashing water from the crystal-clear water . The flying ship quickly disappears over the horizon. Fast-paced action cinematic scene. Do not include music; show sounds from the scene.

Фото профиля Manu
Manu7 месяцев назад

Great comparisons! Your videos convinced me to go back to Kling 😄

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

Kling has always been very good, from day one. 😁 It's my favorite tool

Фото профиля Andy
Andy7 месяцев назад

cool, Kling 3 is nice, Seedance is great but it drops frames, like 16fps randomly at times Ive noticed

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

I don't understand the frame rate issue; Seedance has excellent image quality and motion. I really like both models.

Фото профиля Illusion Krafter
Illusion Krafter7 месяцев назад

We’re getting closer and closer to cinema without cameras.

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

Yes, I'm already creating my series 😊

Фото профиля Illusion Krafter
Illusion Krafter7 месяцев назад

That’s great, looking forward to seeing it.

Фото профиля KED
KED7 месяцев назад

Really impressive result. The camera movement and atmosphere look great. AI filmmaking keeps getting better. We shared a similar experiment on our profile too.

Фото профиля LipSync video
LipSync video7 месяцев назад

@Grok which one do people prefer?

Фото профиля Kōda
Kōda7 месяцев назад

I like these kinds of comparisons, they are really helpful. But every model interprets prompts differently. With a more specific prompt, I think you could achieve the same level of action in Seedance as well.

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

This action is quite specific. When I specify that it splashes in the water, it should quickly descend into the water, like Kling does, but it doesn't execute that instruction. I can be more specific and insist. In Kling, the elements have descriptions stating that it's a high-speed spacecraft.

Фото профиля Kōda
Kōda7 месяцев назад

I saw the prompt you shared. When I give it a timeline or cut-based prompt, it tends to follow the structure quite well. I’ve made a few fight scenes with defined motion and camera angles, and it handled them surprisingly well. Not perfect, but definitely good. You can also define references clearly. For example: Use @ Image1 as the reference for the high-speed spacecraft or something similar. There are many different approaches though, and each model seems to have its own way of interpreting prompts, so it’s hard to say which one works best.

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

Yes, I understand, executes the fight well. I've shown her the elements, but I should have been more specific about quickly diving into the water and splashing while skidding rapidly.

Фото профиля Eve Rides
Eve Rides7 месяцев назад

Kling has better context understanding

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

I agree, I think Seedance needs more detail

Фото профиля Sanky
Sanky7 месяцев назад

Both look incredible.

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

That's right, I love both models, they're suitable for creating films 👊

Фото профиля Jennifer 🇺🇸 🦅
Jennifer 🇺🇸 🦅7 месяцев назад

I wonder if prompting for a slower scene in Kling would make it compare to the tranquil pace of Seedance. Obviously Kling followed your prompt better, and both are beautiful. I really like the waterfall shot at the beginning of the Seedance one, the slower pace lets you take in more scenery.

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

Yes, Seedance's priority is showcasing the elements of the scene, and it does so with overwhelming quality. Kling recreates slow-motion scenes very well; it's capable of creating incredible natural environments. They are tools capable of making films

Фото профиля AirOneWan
AirOneWan7 месяцев назад

Great work, very interesting!

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

I'm glad it's useful 🙌

Фото профиля fokwing
fokwing7 месяцев назад

kling 1080P ,seedance 720P In terms of resolution,kling better

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

That's true, but in this video they both have the same resolution

Фото профиля Satoru Gojo ^)^
Satoru Gojo ^)^7 месяцев назад

Kling 3.0 hands down wins here

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

In this case, yes, but seeding is powerful. Create more detailed prompts to see the result.

Фото профиля TweezlyDee
TweezlyDee7 месяцев назад

😎🙌🏼

Фото профиля Aeri
Aeri7 месяцев назад

Once again, thank you for sharing🙏🙏🙏I appreciate you and everything you do!! Great work!🔥🔥🔥

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

I'm glad to be of help, enjoy your Thursday, dear

Фото профиля Phantom
Phantom7 месяцев назад

Kling is really good with motion and action…seedance is more keen on details and realism

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

Yes, both are excellent, but very different. Seedance handles fight scenes very well; it's best to combine them. 🙌

Фото профиля Aeri
Aeri7 месяцев назад

Is there any reason you wouldn’t mix your platforms/generators for different scenes while creating a “movie” based on what you know about all these generators or do you feel that one 🎥 needs to be consistently built with one generator? It just seems like with all the pros and cons, we will need to be mixing and matching throughout the project for the best outcome for various reasons (on any given project) but I am guessing some people might have different thoughts on this, what do you think?

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

I think the best thing to do is to use both generators. My main generator is Kling with elements that have descriptions. But Seedance is essential for certain scenes, especially fight scenes. 😊

Фото профиля Aeri
Aeri7 месяцев назад

I'm with you on this, thank you hedo🤍

Фото профиля Aeri
Aeri7 месяцев назад

The sound is quite exceptional in the seedance, I keep listening 😲😲😲🔥

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

Yeah, the sound of Seedance is insane!

Фото профиля Aeri
Aeri7 месяцев назад

💯💯💯😻

Фото профиля MO
MO7 месяцев назад

Your artistry is on another level

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

Thank you dear, I appreciate your comment

Фото профиля KeorUnreal
KeorUnreal7 месяцев назад

Amazing comparison buddy! Both are cool🔥

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

Both results are incredible; they are excellent tools

Фото профиля KeorUnreal
KeorUnreal7 месяцев назад

I agree buddy

Фото профиля NΞXUS
NΞXUS7 месяцев назад

Kling was always good with speed

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

Yes, the elements of kling have a description, in this case the description is: high-speed spaceship I think that's what makes the difference between the two videos🙌

Фото профиля GoddessVisual
GoddessVisual7 месяцев назад

Absolutely amazing Dear🤍✨

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

thank you dear

Фото профиля AAT!!! Artworks
AAT!!! Artworks7 месяцев назад

Super dope bro!!! Uve really been enjoying both it seems

Фото профиля hedoήist
hedoήist7 месяцев назад

thanks mate 👊

Фото профиля 𝕄𝔸𝕋ℝ𝕀𝕏
𝕄𝔸𝕋ℝ𝕀𝕏7 месяцев назад

This is hit bro! Amazing work!

Похожие видео

Kling 3.0 vs Gemini Omni Flash vs Grok Imagine 1.5 vs Seedance 2.0. Another battle for the best AI video tool. This time I tested an extremely difficult stunt scene: a bridge jump, landing on a moving truck, then jumping onto a car and taking it over. No model handled it perfectly. Not even Seedance 2.0. The scene itself was very hard, but I kept the prompt relatively simple, without stuffing it with too many complex stunt terms. After Veo 3.1’s terrible results in previous rounds, I didn’t even include it this time. Seedance needed 4 attempts to give me a decent result. Gemini Omni Flash needed even more: 7 generations, and I picked the best one. Kling and Grok got 4 attempts each. None of them looked promising enough to justify more retries. My take: Grok Imagine 1.5, the new “revolutionary” release, once again showed that it still can’t handle complex action scenes properly. Two tests in a row now, and the result is objectively weak. Kling 3.0 feels outdated, but in this test it actually looked slightly better than Grok Imagine 1.5, which says a lot. Gemini Omni Flash gives decent movement, but the physics and action logic are clearly off. It’s better than Grok and Kling here, but still very far from the super-generator Google markets it as. Seedance 2.0 was the best again, as expected. Still not perfect. It also has a clear physics issue, because pulling a driver out of a moving car while standing on the road makes no physical sense. But overall, Seedance still produced a much more intense and cinematic scene than all the others. My ranking for this test: 1. Seedance 2.0 — clear winner, even with flaws 2. Gemini Omni Flash 3. Kling 3.0 4. Grok Imagine 1.5 — unfortunately, the weakest right now in my opinion Do you agree? #AIVideo

Alpha Mom

67,514 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад