Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

A US Senator just said on live TV that building superintelligence should carry the same penalty as building an illegal nuclear weapon. Up to 20 years in prison. Corporate shutdown for the company. Bernie Sanders, MS NOW, Sept 10: "Certainly we don't want to go into superintelligent AI. We...

24,764 views • 10 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇺🇸 THE MYSTERIOUS FILIBUSTER! - As much as we talk about the filibuster, few people actually understand it. Under filibuster rules you don't need 60 votes to pass legislation. You need 60 votes to get to cloture, which means you can then vote on the legislation. Right now with the SAVE America Act we have 51 votes. We have enough votes to pass the legislation but we can't get to cloture because we can't get enough Democrats to cross the aisle to get to 60 votes. Of course Democrats don't want election integrity. We talk about the nuclear option, thinking that this means the Senate will vote to end the filibuster rule. That's not what it means. Actually achieving cloture to vote to end the filibuster rule would require a two-thirds Senate vote. And that's impossible. What is possible is when you bring up the SAVE America Act for a cloture vote and you only get 51 out of the 60 required, a senator can then raise a point of order saying that "cloture on this bill should only need a simple majority." The chair would rule against him, backed up by the parliamentarian. That senator can then appeal and the question becomes, "shall the decision of the chair stand?" The Senate then votes on that appeal and if 51 senators vote to overrule the chair then the vote on the SAVE America Act can take place. Yes this is a tortured way of doing things but that's "the nuclear option." Harry Reid did it in 2013 on federal judges and Mitch McConnell did it in 2017 on Supreme Court judges. But again the problem we have now is: do we have enough Senators to get to 51 to do the nuclear option? According to John Thune we don't. Thoughts? ⬇️

Bill Mitchell

17,413 views • 1 month ago

🚨 JUST IN: Rep. Tim Burchett sounds the alarm that Congress is about to FUND a fraudulent group that gives aid to Africa, acquiescing to Democrats — yet they REFUSE to attach the SAVE Act to the funding package "They SAID 'please don't send us any more dadgum money. We're stealing! It's corrupt!' It NEEDS TO STOP." "And you can't even get the Republican controlled Senate to back him on that. Why? Oh, we're not going to get our stuff funded if we don't." "And the same thing in the House. We're trying to pass the SAVE Act." "Why won't we attach that to something and make them do it? Why? Because we're complacent and we get our funding for our stuff and we don't want to rock the boat. Well, that boat has sailed, folks!" "We need to start, we need to be flagrant boat rockers from here on out. This is what really frustrates me about our leadership, how we play ball. And the Democrats never do." "They just stick together and vote for a bunch of garbage and the liberal media lets them do it and they never call them into question. We got to do better, folks. We got to do better!" "Pay attention to what's going on this week. This week, there's going to be a lot of infighting and a lot of finger pointing and, oh, you're going to shut the government down. We're not going to get our stuff, is what it amounts to." "We're not going to get our stuff. And we're throwing our backs out of whack by trying to pat ourselves on the back, telling y'all how great a job we're doing. Our messaging stinks." "The best friend the Democrats have right now is the Republican messaging. It's unbelievable. It is unbelievable."

Eric Daugherty

114,086 views • 7 months ago