正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Bernie Sanders just introduced a bill threatening AI developers with 20 years in prison if their models match or exceed human cognitive performance across broad tasks. And the bill says all development has to STOP until a brand-new cabinet-level agency is created and staffed, and writes its rules. HOWEVER,... show more

Glenn Beck

2,282,438 subscribers

79,230 次观看 • 3 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

RFK just gave a flawless answer to Bernie Sanders asking if health care is a human right. Bet Sanders didn't expect an answer this intelligent... he interrupted RFK IMMEDIATELY. SANDERS: Is it a human right? Yes or no? RFK: In the way that free speech is? It's different, because free speech costs nothing. In health care - if you smoke cigs for 20 years, and you get cancer - you are now taking from the pool of resources..- SANDERS: -We've got a few minutes left here.

RFK just gave a flawless answer to Bernie Sanders asking if health care is a human right. Bet Sanders didn't expect an answer this intelligent... he interrupted RFK IMMEDIATELY. SANDERS: Is it a human right? Yes or no? RFK: In the way that free speech is? It's different, because free speech costs nothing. In health care - if you smoke cigs for 20 years, and you get cancer - you are now taking from the pool of resources..- SANDERS: -We've got a few minutes left here.

Eric Daugherty

6,354,389 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 JIANG: “I’ve been in China for 25 years and I can tell you that there is almost no interest for a democracy in China. For a democracy to exist in China you would need to have people who respected human rights, individual liberty, who had empathy, and who believed in the rule of law. The reality is that in China the system is set up so that the ultimate objective is to become a bureaucrat. That’s what all Chinese people aspire to. The higher you climb the bureaucracy the better. Traditionally China has been an empire and in order to survive in an empire you become a civil servant. That’s why Chinese work so hard in school. So they can pass the civil servant examination to become a bureaucrat so they can provide guarantees and protection to their family.”

🚨 JIANG: “I’ve been in China for 25 years and I can tell you that there is almost no interest for a democracy in China. For a democracy to exist in China you would need to have people who respected human rights, individual liberty, who had empathy, and who believed in the rule of law. The reality is that in China the system is set up so that the ultimate objective is to become a bureaucrat. That’s what all Chinese people aspire to. The higher you climb the bureaucracy the better. Traditionally China has been an empire and in order to survive in an empire you become a civil servant. That’s why Chinese work so hard in school. So they can pass the civil servant examination to become a bureaucrat so they can provide guarantees and protection to their family.”

Autism Capital 🧩

1,635,254 次观看 • 5 个月前

This beautiful video is not AI, it happened in Zimbabwe’s Victoria Falls, a place that remains a must-visit for all humanity, if finances permit. Only in Zimbabwe can you have a front row seat in your hotel and watch nature come to you. This is what we mean when we say Zimbabwe is the best place to visit in Africa if you want to see and marvel at wildlife blending with flora and fauna, and at times passing by to say hello. Victoria Falls is one of the few places on earth where the line between luxury and wilderness is beautifully blurred. You can sleep in a comfortable and secure bed, enjoy world class hospitality, and still wake up to the possibility that Africa, in all its raw and untamed glory, might wander past reception. It is not chaos at all, it is African authenticity. If you want something real, something unforgettable, something that will leave you with stories no one else can tell, then this is exactly where you need to be, beautiful Zimbabwe.

This beautiful video is not AI, it happened in Zimbabwe’s Victoria Falls, a place that remains a must-visit for all humanity, if finances permit. Only in Zimbabwe can you have a front row seat in your hotel and watch nature come to you. This is what we mean when we say Zimbabwe is the best place to visit in Africa if you want to see and marvel at wildlife blending with flora and fauna, and at times passing by to say hello. Victoria Falls is one of the few places on earth where the line between luxury and wilderness is beautifully blurred. You can sleep in a comfortable and secure bed, enjoy world class hospitality, and still wake up to the possibility that Africa, in all its raw and untamed glory, might wander past reception. It is not chaos at all, it is African authenticity. If you want something real, something unforgettable, something that will leave you with stories no one else can tell, then this is exactly where you need to be, beautiful Zimbabwe.

Hopewell Chin’ono

167,021 次观看 • 4 个月前

Sen. Bernie Sanders: The future of our country and the entire world is hanging in the balance. The choices that we face are clear. In the wealthiest country in the history of the world, we now have the opportunity to create a nation in which all people can enjoy a dignified standard of living, where we wipe out bigotry and hatred and where all of us can live in peace and participate in a vibrant democracy

Sen. Bernie Sanders: The future of our country and the entire world is hanging in the balance. The choices that we face are clear. In the wealthiest country in the history of the world, we now have the opportunity to create a nation in which all people can enjoy a dignified standard of living, where we wipe out bigotry and hatred and where all of us can live in peace and participate in a vibrant democracy

Headquarters

32,243 次观看 • 5 个月前

240327 Lay Zhang | Show It All Teaser S: I just want her to make others fall in love with her in the first second. YX: You're asking someone who has never been on stage before to be a sensation right away. You are expecting too much. Can you become a director on your first day? Tell me, can you become a director on your first day? I admire you if you can. You can't use the standards of a professional, like us who have been in the industry for over ten years, to demand perfection from someone who has just started their career. S: Our current goal is to let others like us, right? YX: Our goal is to take Chinese music to the world. Everyone, everyone is just a vector under this grand vision. If you think you want that one look that can captivate you, let me tell you, all the kids have it. But where is that look supposed to be, where is the camera positioned? Please tell me. Please tell me, program director, where you want that moment to be. What you want in that moment is just the program director's 0.0001 second. I can tell the kids, "Just focus on that camera, and at that moment, the shot will come." Tell me first, who does the program director listen to? If you say the program director listens to me, I'll hold a meeting with them. If the girl group can't give you that feeling of being "captivated," then it's my problem. #lay #yixing

240327 Lay Zhang | Show It All Teaser S: I just want her to make others fall in love with her in the first second. YX: You're asking someone who has never been on stage before to be a sensation right away. You are expecting too much. Can you become a director on your first day? Tell me, can you become a director on your first day? I admire you if you can. You can't use the standards of a professional, like us who have been in the industry for over ten years, to demand perfection from someone who has just started their career. S: Our current goal is to let others like us, right? YX: Our goal is to take Chinese music to the world. Everyone, everyone is just a vector under this grand vision. If you think you want that one look that can captivate you, let me tell you, all the kids have it. But where is that look supposed to be, where is the camera positioned? Please tell me. Please tell me, program director, where you want that moment to be. What you want in that moment is just the program director's 0.0001 second. I can tell the kids, "Just focus on that camera, and at that moment, the shot will come." Tell me first, who does the program director listen to? If you say the program director listens to me, I'll hold a meeting with them. If the girl group can't give you that feeling of being "captivated," then it's my problem. #lay #yixing

Yu💙 ŸÜ❄️ 道不同不相为谋

61,066 次观看 • 2 年前

Tax expert explains what happens if you owe millions to the IRS and can’t pay “If you owe the IRS and you legitimately don’t have the money to pay them, you have two options. You can either get on a payment plan or you can do an offer in compromise” “Now the payment plan only works if your tax bill is $50,000 or less. So if you’re making millions and you owe millions, you’re in a situation here” “This is where the offer in compromise comes in. The IRS knows you probably aren’t going to be able to pay them back with the income that you currently have sitting inside your savings account or the income that they can see coming in” “So if you can show that you’ve had a negative economic gain, you’re making less money, you’re not able to really grow your revenue, they will start to focus on creating a compromise with you” “We call these OICs. This is where you offer the IRS a reduced amount and you compromise on that amount and hopefully you can pay that in a lump sum and be able to rid away with your IRS debt” “Or what they’ll also allow for you to do is pay a percentage of it in a lump sum and then get the rest on a payment plan”

Tax expert explains what happens if you owe millions to the IRS and can’t pay “If you owe the IRS and you legitimately don’t have the money to pay them, you have two options. You can either get on a payment plan or you can do an offer in compromise” “Now the payment plan only works if your tax bill is $50,000 or less. So if you’re making millions and you owe millions, you’re in a situation here” “This is where the offer in compromise comes in. The IRS knows you probably aren’t going to be able to pay them back with the income that you currently have sitting inside your savings account or the income that they can see coming in” “So if you can show that you’ve had a negative economic gain, you’re making less money, you’re not able to really grow your revenue, they will start to focus on creating a compromise with you” “We call these OICs. This is where you offer the IRS a reduced amount and you compromise on that amount and hopefully you can pay that in a lump sum and be able to rid away with your IRS debt” “Or what they’ll also allow for you to do is pay a percentage of it in a lump sum and then get the rest on a payment plan”

Jack

862,744 次观看 • 4 个月前

“If you can beat the oligarchs here…that will send a message to every community in America that real change is possible.” More of my conversation with Bernie Sanders on democracy, oligarchy and his time as Mayor.

“If you can beat the oligarchs here…that will send a message to every community in America that real change is possible.” More of my conversation with Bernie Sanders on democracy, oligarchy and his time as Mayor.

Zohran Kwame Mamdani

175,425 次观看 • 11 个月前

Bill Gates says he's staking whatever reputation he has on AI being the one technology that truly breaks from history "Anyone who analogizes AI as a technology to other technologies is missing that this time is different. And saying something is different, there's a very high bar for that." "But I'm staking whatever reputation I have saying this time is different, that something that exceeds human cognition, not just in one area like farming or mathematics, but across the board, and then in a few years' time will be coupled with fairly low-cost, quite capable humanoid robotics." "That is a more profound change to our economy and jobs than anything in my lifetime by a dramatic amount." "And so the past is kind of there to fool you if you think this technology is similar to other ones, some of which I had the privilege to be involved with, the microprocessor, personal computer, internet." "And even though you have to be careful with those a bit, overwhelmingly those were good technologies, and overwhelmingly that led to net job creation."

Bill Gates says he's staking whatever reputation he has on AI being the one technology that truly breaks from history "Anyone who analogizes AI as a technology to other technologies is missing that this time is different. And saying something is different, there's a very high bar for that." "But I'm staking whatever reputation I have saying this time is different, that something that exceeds human cognition, not just in one area like farming or mathematics, but across the board, and then in a few years' time will be coupled with fairly low-cost, quite capable humanoid robotics." "That is a more profound change to our economy and jobs than anything in my lifetime by a dramatic amount." "And so the past is kind of there to fool you if you think this technology is similar to other ones, some of which I had the privilege to be involved with, the microprocessor, personal computer, internet." "And even though you have to be careful with those a bit, overwhelmingly those were good technologies, and overwhelmingly that led to net job creation."

Fireside Alpha

405,143 次观看 • 11 天前

JUST IN: Senator Bernie Sanders (Sen. Bernie Sanders) slams Trump: "Zelenskyy is leading a country trying to defend democracy against an authoritarian dictator, Putin, who invaded his country. Millions of Americans are embarrassed, are ashamed that we have a president of the United States who says that Ukraine started the war, that Zelenskyy is a dictator. He’s got it exactly backwards." Sanders adds, "What we have right now in Washington, let me be very clear, is a government of the billionaire class, by the billionaire class, and for the billionaire class. These guys want to get their greed — their greed is uncontrollable. More tax breaks to billionaires, cuts to programs for the elderly, the children, and the poor. We’ve got to fight back."

JUST IN: Senator Bernie Sanders (Sen. Bernie Sanders) slams Trump: "Zelenskyy is leading a country trying to defend democracy against an authoritarian dictator, Putin, who invaded his country. Millions of Americans are embarrassed, are ashamed that we have a president of the United States who says that Ukraine started the war, that Zelenskyy is a dictator. He’s got it exactly backwards." Sanders adds, "What we have right now in Washington, let me be very clear, is a government of the billionaire class, by the billionaire class, and for the billionaire class. These guys want to get their greed — their greed is uncontrollable. More tax breaks to billionaires, cuts to programs for the elderly, the children, and the poor. We’ve got to fight back."

Simon Ateba

20,317 次观看 • 1 年前

Just so everyone knows, we have passed the point where you can tell what is AI at a glance (or even, in many cases, a close look) These were all made by me with text prompts alone using Veo 3.

Just so everyone knows, we have passed the point where you can tell what is AI at a glance (or even, in many cases, a close look) These were all made by me with text prompts alone using Veo 3.

Ethan Mollick

602,088 次观看 • 1 年前

Congresswoman Lisa McClain Says Anyone In Government Who Refuses To Answer Questions & Deflects, Needs To Be Replaced “I'm gonna share with the American people, if you get somebody who's in charge, especially in a government entity that can't answer a question, you should ask yourself, do we need to replace this person who can't answer a simple question? I mean, my goodness gracious. The disappointment that I have that you can't even answer a simple question is unbelievable. Yet, you wanna be in charge, and you wanna tell the very people who you have no clue about their business what they can and can't do. That to me is repulsive.”

Congresswoman Lisa McClain Says Anyone In Government Who Refuses To Answer Questions & Deflects, Needs To Be Replaced “I'm gonna share with the American people, if you get somebody who's in charge, especially in a government entity that can't answer a question, you should ask yourself, do we need to replace this person who can't answer a simple question? I mean, my goodness gracious. The disappointment that I have that you can't even answer a simple question is unbelievable. Yet, you wanna be in charge, and you wanna tell the very people who you have no clue about their business what they can and can't do. That to me is repulsive.”

Wall Street Apes

1,094,445 次观看 • 2 年前

A Few Thoughts on Robotics The criticism that robotics can only be used in a rather one-sided way is, at the same time, the solution to the problem. What do I mean by that? Since the Industrial Revolution, humanity has increasingly made production methods more efficient. Fordism introduced assembly line work, but this comes at the expense of monotonous, repetitive tasks. On the one hand, immense wealth has been created; on the other hand, countless people suffer from repetitive tasks, which are a direct consequence of that industrial revolution and the division of labor- in other words, assembly line work. The debate about whether AI and robotics could impact the labor market is answered in different ways. I have a clear opinion on this: Up to now, technology has merely been an augmentation, an improvement of human labor to make it more effective. Robotics and AI, however, represent a qualitative break with this situation. For the first time in human history, it won't be humans who become more efficient, but rather replaceable, insofar as human augmentation becomes *less* efficient than replacing human labor with robotics. In just a few years, a human using technology will simply be less efficient than a robot that doesn't know an eight-hour day, weekends, or holidays, but can perform monotonous tasks 24/7 on an assembly line without breaking down due to physical ailments or needing medical attention. Wear and tear simply means replacing specific parts of the robot. To return to the initial question: production doesn't require general-purpose robots capable of performing a wide variety of tasks, but rather specialized robots that excel at the specific tasks for which they are needed. Figure02 vividly illustrates why this is only now possible: even the simplest assembly line work still requires delicate manual dexterity because the production line is designed for human hands. This breakthrough has now arrived, but AGI (Automated Generating Intelligence) isn't necessary for robots to be used in production processes. It's sufficient that they can perform monotonous tasks. And that's why I believe 2026 will be the year of the robots. (Clip: Figure02 in production chain at BMW Car-production)

A Few Thoughts on Robotics The criticism that robotics can only be used in a rather one-sided way is, at the same time, the solution to the problem. What do I mean by that? Since the Industrial Revolution, humanity has increasingly made production methods more efficient. Fordism introduced assembly line work, but this comes at the expense of monotonous, repetitive tasks. On the one hand, immense wealth has been created; on the other hand, countless people suffer from repetitive tasks, which are a direct consequence of that industrial revolution and the division of labor- in other words, assembly line work. The debate about whether AI and robotics could impact the labor market is answered in different ways. I have a clear opinion on this: Up to now, technology has merely been an augmentation, an improvement of human labor to make it more effective. Robotics and AI, however, represent a qualitative break with this situation. For the first time in human history, it won't be humans who become more efficient, but rather replaceable, insofar as human augmentation becomes less efficient than replacing human labor with robotics. In just a few years, a human using technology will simply be less efficient than a robot that doesn't know an eight-hour day, weekends, or holidays, but can perform monotonous tasks 24/7 on an assembly line without breaking down due to physical ailments or needing medical attention. Wear and tear simply means replacing specific parts of the robot. To return to the initial question: production doesn't require general-purpose robots capable of performing a wide variety of tasks, but rather specialized robots that excel at the specific tasks for which they are needed. Figure02 vividly illustrates why this is only now possible: even the simplest assembly line work still requires delicate manual dexterity because the production line is designed for human hands. This breakthrough has now arrived, but AGI (Automated Generating Intelligence) isn't necessary for robots to be used in production processes. It's sufficient that they can perform monotonous tasks. And that's why I believe 2026 will be the year of the robots. (Clip: Figure02 in production chain at BMW Car-production)

Chubby♨️

15,228 次观看 • 9 个月前

.Naval: Every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species. One of the things that you really learn when you read David Deutsch’s theories and you authenticate them for yourself is you realize humans are universal explainers. That means everything that we know in the universe follows the laws of physics, and there’s no reason to believe otherwise. If you think otherwise, then please present your better theory that explains the world. If you can’t do that, then you have to go with the laws of physics. Well, the laws of physics are completely computable. They can fit inside a Turing machine or computer, and a computer can simulate the laws of physics with arbitrary accuracy, limited only by the specific power of that computer. If you increase the power of that computer, you can simulate them more accurately. So humans already simulate—in our minds we simulate—and through our computers we simulate the weather, we simulate quasars, we even simulate human systems. We simulate the economy. We simulate all kinds of things. So anything that can be understood, we can understand in our minds. This is something the AGI people get wrong when they talk about superintelligence. There is nothing out there that can understand something fundamentally that we can’t understand. It might be faster at it, it might have more compute, it might have more memory, but there’s no concept that it can understand that we can’t ourselves understand. So we are maximal universal explainers. That means every human is capable of unbounded creativity. Anyone could be the next Einstein or Fermi or Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos or Jonas Salk or whatever. So we can create anything. And if we can create anything, every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species.

.Naval: Every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species. One of the things that you really learn when you read David Deutsch’s theories and you authenticate them for yourself is you realize humans are universal explainers. That means everything that we know in the universe follows the laws of physics, and there’s no reason to believe otherwise. If you think otherwise, then please present your better theory that explains the world. If you can’t do that, then you have to go with the laws of physics. Well, the laws of physics are completely computable. They can fit inside a Turing machine or computer, and a computer can simulate the laws of physics with arbitrary accuracy, limited only by the specific power of that computer. If you increase the power of that computer, you can simulate them more accurately. So humans already simulate—in our minds we simulate—and through our computers we simulate the weather, we simulate quasars, we even simulate human systems. We simulate the economy. We simulate all kinds of things. So anything that can be understood, we can understand in our minds. This is something the AGI people get wrong when they talk about superintelligence. There is nothing out there that can understand something fundamentally that we can’t understand. It might be faster at it, it might have more compute, it might have more memory, but there’s no concept that it can understand that we can’t ourselves understand. So we are maximal universal explainers. That means every human is capable of unbounded creativity. Anyone could be the next Einstein or Fermi or Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos or Jonas Salk or whatever. So we can create anything. And if we can create anything, every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species.

Arjun Khemani

33,110 次观看 • 1 年前

"Courage is far shorter in supply than genius." - Peter Thiel "One of the challenges in writing a book about entrepreneurship or teaching a class on this is that there is sort of no formula. And I think science always starts with a number two. It starts with experiments you can repeat, things you can do over and over again. But there's sort of a sense in which every moment in the history of business, every moment in the history of technology happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg will not be starting a social networking company. The next Larry Page will not start a search engine. The next Bill Gates will not be starting an operating system. And so if you are trying to copy these people, you're in some sense not learning from them. And so I think one of the really big challenges in teaching or writing about entrepreneurship is what can you say about being an entrepreneur at all when the key thing is always to do something new, different, that's not precisely been done before. And so the point of departure I start with in Zero to One is a somewhat indirect approach by asking a series of contrarian questions. The business question is, what great company is nobody starting? The more intellectual version of this question is, tell me something true that very few people agree with you on. And this is a fantastic interview question. It turns out to be quite a hard question, even when people can read on the internet that you ask of everybody who comes in the door, it still is a hard question. It's one of those unusual questions where if you know it's on the test, it's still hard. And it's hard not just because we sort of think that new things require brilliance or something like that, but because it's socially difficult. If I ask you that question, if you tell me something like the education system is screwed up or our political system doesn't work very well, those are true answers, but they're not actually good answers because all of us already know them to be true. The good answers are ones that are somehow uncomfortable that the person interviewing you does not actually want to hear. And I think we live in this world where courage is in far shorter supply than genius. And so it is sort of this, it is in a sense this problem of political correctness properly understood, is this very deep, very, very broad sort of a problem."

"Courage is far shorter in supply than genius." - Peter Thiel "One of the challenges in writing a book about entrepreneurship or teaching a class on this is that there is sort of no formula. And I think science always starts with a number two. It starts with experiments you can repeat, things you can do over and over again. But there's sort of a sense in which every moment in the history of business, every moment in the history of technology happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg will not be starting a social networking company. The next Larry Page will not start a search engine. The next Bill Gates will not be starting an operating system. And so if you are trying to copy these people, you're in some sense not learning from them. And so I think one of the really big challenges in teaching or writing about entrepreneurship is what can you say about being an entrepreneur at all when the key thing is always to do something new, different, that's not precisely been done before. And so the point of departure I start with in Zero to One is a somewhat indirect approach by asking a series of contrarian questions. The business question is, what great company is nobody starting? The more intellectual version of this question is, tell me something true that very few people agree with you on. And this is a fantastic interview question. It turns out to be quite a hard question, even when people can read on the internet that you ask of everybody who comes in the door, it still is a hard question. It's one of those unusual questions where if you know it's on the test, it's still hard. And it's hard not just because we sort of think that new things require brilliance or something like that, but because it's socially difficult. If I ask you that question, if you tell me something like the education system is screwed up or our political system doesn't work very well, those are true answers, but they're not actually good answers because all of us already know them to be true. The good answers are ones that are somehow uncomfortable that the person interviewing you does not actually want to hear. And I think we live in this world where courage is in far shorter supply than genius. And so it is sort of this, it is in a sense this problem of political correctness properly understood, is this very deep, very, very broad sort of a problem."

Founder Mode

12,339 次观看 • 7 个月前

🇺🇸 AI IS GETTING HARDER TO SPOT Rizwan Virk says we’re already at the point where AI can pass the classic Turing Test in text, so most people can’t tell if they’re talking to a human or a machine anymore. And the next step is virtual worlds, where AI characters (NPCs) could become so smart you won’t know if they’re controlled by a person or not. We’re not at rogue robots yet, but smarter AI inside games and simulations is coming first, and fast. Once AI blends in seamlessly, the line between tool, character, and independent actor starts getting very blurry. Full Interview with Rizwan Virk below.

🇺🇸 AI IS GETTING HARDER TO SPOT Rizwan Virk says we’re already at the point where AI can pass the classic Turing Test in text, so most people can’t tell if they’re talking to a human or a machine anymore. And the next step is virtual worlds, where AI characters (NPCs) could become so smart you won’t know if they’re controlled by a person or not. We’re not at rogue robots yet, but smarter AI inside games and simulations is coming first, and fast. Once AI blends in seamlessly, the line between tool, character, and independent actor starts getting very blurry. Full Interview with Rizwan Virk below.

Mario Nawfal

17,457 次观看 • 7 个月前

Apparently Bernie Sanders has been fighting an invisible enemy for the 30+ years he’s been in office … OLIGARCHY. The only progress he’s made has been to become a multi-millionaire off it … because stupid people pay for that sh*t … I mean rhetoric. Sen. Bernie Sanders is a broken record that needs to be put back on the shelf, because he keeps repeating himself at the point of the scratch, over and over again.

Apparently Bernie Sanders has been fighting an invisible enemy for the 30+ years he’s been in office … OLIGARCHY. The only progress he’s made has been to become a multi-millionaire off it … because stupid people pay for that sh*t … I mean rhetoric. Sen. Bernie Sanders is a broken record that needs to be put back on the shelf, because he keeps repeating himself at the point of the scratch, over and over again.

C-Reason🇺🇸

19,466 次观看 • 10 个月前