Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

AAA: Battery Size BBB: Dalshabet CCC: Climate Change Commission DDD:

shxun •ᴗ•

1,183 subscribers

72,893 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

xdinary heroes excited to have similarities w the boyz😆 🐹 tbz title VVV right? oh! we have song BBB in this album 👤 we have DDD song in an old album 🐺 we have Zzz all: *excited* 👤 BBB, DDD, VVV if we all go to AAA award, we could do collab stage do BBB, DDD, VVV at AAA

xdinary heroes excited to have similarities w the boyz😆 🐹 tbz title VVV right? oh! we have song BBB in this album 👤 we have DDD song in an old album 🐺 we have Zzz all: excited 👤 BBB, DDD, VVV if we all go to AAA award, we could do collab stage do BBB, DDD, VVV at AAA

파라♪ 🐥🍉

57,777 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Here is Chair of the Climate Change Committee Climate Change Committee, Emma Pinchbeck, lying about why bills have gone up. The CCC is supposed to inform Parliament. But it's literally a committee of liars.

Here is Chair of the Climate Change Committee Climate Change Committee, Emma Pinchbeck, lying about why bills have gone up. The CCC is supposed to inform Parliament. But it's literally a committee of liars.

Ben Pile

95,979 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

>>> CLIMATE CHANGE is CLIMATE CHANGED by Governments. Listen to the SPECIAL COMMISSION ON WEATHER MODIFICATION 1965<<<

>>> CLIMATE CHANGE is CLIMATE CHANGED by Governments. Listen to the SPECIAL COMMISSION ON WEATHER MODIFICATION 1965<<<

The White Rabbit Podcast 🐇

13,324 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

NET ZERO: Where now with Net Zero? Reality may be dawning but we are still stuck with Net Zero - and Climate Change Committee (CCC) telling us how to live our lives What is the outlook & what can be done? And what is the CCC anyway? New interview with Ben Pile:

NET ZERO: Where now with Net Zero? Reality may be dawning but we are still stuck with Net Zero - and Climate Change Committee (CCC) telling us how to live our lives What is the outlook & what can be done? And what is the CCC anyway? New interview with Ben Pile:

Together

41,415 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

African Union Commission Chair Mahamoud Ali Youssouf called on the world's most polluting countries to help African states develop their adaptation plans to fight climate change

African Union Commission Chair Mahamoud Ali Youssouf called on the world's most polluting countries to help African states develop their adaptation plans to fight climate change

Reuters

24,754 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Zuckerberg:- “How about stopping Climate Change before we destroy the whole planet?” Also Zuckerberg with his own personal yacht - the size of a small city guzzling Diesel wherever it goes.

Zuckerberg:- “How about stopping Climate Change before we destroy the whole planet?” Also Zuckerberg with his own personal yacht - the size of a small city guzzling Diesel wherever it goes.

Concerned Citizen

212,447 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

WATCH: A Greenland shark, the world’s longest-lived vertebrate, caught on camera. Despite their large size and long lifespan, Greenland sharks are still poorly understood. There is a lot for us to learn about this species and how they’re impacted by threats like climate change.

WATCH: A Greenland shark, the world’s longest-lived vertebrate, caught on camera. Despite their large size and long lifespan, Greenland sharks are still poorly understood. There is a lot for us to learn about this species and how they’re impacted by threats like climate change.

Oceana Canada

175,362 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

If climate change is an emergency, why build water/power hungry data centres? This Victorian AI Hub will guzzle more grid power than it generates onsite battery & turbines just prop up the shared system (with gas backups). Data centres could hit 13% of Australia’s electricity by 2040, spiking prices, straining water supplies (hello desalination). Who pays? 🫵🏼🤑

If climate change is an emergency, why build water/power hungry data centres? This Victorian AI Hub will guzzle more grid power than it generates onsite battery & turbines just prop up the shared system (with gas backups). Data centres could hit 13% of Australia’s electricity by 2040, spiking prices, straining water supplies (hello desalination). Who pays? 🫵🏼🤑

katy 🌸

17,564 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨🌎🇺🇸 HOLY SHIT!!! Nothing to see here - just the latest HAARP Outpost being towed out into the Caribbean Sea in order to generate some more ‘Climate Change’. Look at the size of this thing. You all still think weather manipulation is just a crazy conspiracy though right?

🚨🌎🇺🇸 HOLY SHIT!!! Nothing to see here - just the latest HAARP Outpost being towed out into the Caribbean Sea in order to generate some more ‘Climate Change’. Look at the size of this thing. You all still think weather manipulation is just a crazy conspiracy though right?

Concerned Citizen

860,248 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Absolutely thrilled and grateful to share that my poem, “Whispers of Change: America’s Climate Call,” has been uniquely honored by the prestigious American Academy of Arts and Sciences, established in 1780, as the very first poem in a Commission report! Immense gratitude to my grandmother for her unwavering belief in the power of my words to shed light on hidden truths. Don't miss the impactful report, “Forging Climate Solutions: How to Accelerate Action Across America”! #ClimateAction #FairBargain #Justice

Absolutely thrilled and grateful to share that my poem, “Whispers of Change: America’s Climate Call,” has been uniquely honored by the prestigious American Academy of Arts and Sciences, established in 1780, as the very first poem in a Commission report! Immense gratitude to my grandmother for her unwavering belief in the power of my words to shed light on hidden truths. Don't miss the impactful report, “Forging Climate Solutions: How to Accelerate Action Across America”! #ClimateAction #FairBargain #Justice

Dr. Mustafa Santiago Ali 🤙🏾✊🏾

13,078 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

WATCH‼️ President of Guyana slaps down arrogant BBC reporter. “You cannot lecture us on climate change, I will lecture YOU! …we have a forest the size of England and Scotland together that stores 19.5 gigatons of carbon. …the world has destroyed 65% of its biodiversity — we have kept ours”. 😘 🤌

WATCH‼️ President of Guyana slaps down arrogant BBC reporter. “You cannot lecture us on climate change, I will lecture YOU! …we have a forest the size of England and Scotland together that stores 19.5 gigatons of carbon. …the world has destroyed 65% of its biodiversity — we have kept ours”. 😘 🤌

Ai Business Journal

7,636,969 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

WATCH‼️ President of Guyana slaps down arrogant BBC reporter. “You cannot lecture us on climate change, I will lecture YOU! …we have a forest the size of England and Scotland together that stores 19.5 gigatons of carbon. …the world has destroyed 65% of its biodiversity — we have kept ours”. 😘 🤌

WATCH‼️ President of Guyana slaps down arrogant BBC reporter. “You cannot lecture us on climate change, I will lecture YOU! …we have a forest the size of England and Scotland together that stores 19.5 gigatons of carbon. …the world has destroyed 65% of its biodiversity — we have kept ours”. 😘 🤌

The Business of Ai 🤖

211,812 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Urban bureaucrats don’t understand rural reality. At Environment Committee, I pressed Megan Nichols from Environment and Climate Change Canada on how the Liberals’ EV mandate will affect access to vehicles that actually meet the needs of Canadians in rural and remote communities. Rural Canadians deserve real choices, not Ottawa’s one-size-fits-all mandates.

Urban bureaucrats don’t understand rural reality. At Environment Committee, I pressed Megan Nichols from Environment and Climate Change Canada on how the Liberals’ EV mandate will affect access to vehicles that actually meet the needs of Canadians in rural and remote communities. Rural Canadians deserve real choices, not Ottawa’s one-size-fits-all mandates.

David Bexte

20,543 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Aussies warned about questioning climate change The Australian Human Rights Commission, in a stunning reversal of its core mission, is now calling for the government to regulate what citizens say about climate change. Their justification? Combating "misinformation." This immediately begs the question: Who becomes the arbiter of truth? The same establishment with a long track record of failed apocalyptic predictions? From "permanent droughts" that never came to pass, to deadlines for coastal nations being "wiped out" that expired decades ago, the alarmist narrative has been consistently wrong. Now, the proposed solution to this credibility gap isn't debate or better science—it's silence. The Commission admits censorship can "erode trust," yet demands "swift and decisive" action to stifle dissent anyway. This is a fundamental betrayal. A Human Rights Commission should be the guardian of free expression—the right to question, to disagree, and to challenge the powerful. It is the bedrock of a free society. The lesson here is global: The most dangerous "misinformation" is the idea that you can protect human rights by dismantling them first.

Aussies warned about questioning climate change The Australian Human Rights Commission, in a stunning reversal of its core mission, is now calling for the government to regulate what citizens say about climate change. Their justification? Combating "misinformation." This immediately begs the question: Who becomes the arbiter of truth? The same establishment with a long track record of failed apocalyptic predictions? From "permanent droughts" that never came to pass, to deadlines for coastal nations being "wiped out" that expired decades ago, the alarmist narrative has been consistently wrong. Now, the proposed solution to this credibility gap isn't debate or better science—it's silence. The Commission admits censorship can "erode trust," yet demands "swift and decisive" action to stifle dissent anyway. This is a fundamental betrayal. A Human Rights Commission should be the guardian of free expression—the right to question, to disagree, and to challenge the powerful. It is the bedrock of a free society. The lesson here is global: The most dangerous "misinformation" is the idea that you can protect human rights by dismantling them first.

Camus

30,657 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

The president of the transit union, Sukhwinder Singh, told Regina’s mayor and council that the city’s brand new $2M electric buses are only drivable for 1.5-3 hours in the winter before their battery dies. Regina currently has 7 electric buses in its fleet with 13 more planned for delivery in 2026 as part of the city’s climate change action plan. They had a combined cost of $50M+ which was split between the city and the federal government.

Just Bins

603,285 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Wildfires are a growing concern in Washington and across the United States as fire seasons get longer due to drought and climate change. HB 1522 improves the safety of electric utility infrastructure and reduces the risk of wildfires. This bill gives the Utilities and Transportation Commission more ability to help utilities improve their wildfire mitigation plans. Great to sign Rep. Tom Dent’s 4th bill this session into law. Grateful to him and companion sponsor Sen. Mike Chapman.

Wildfires are a growing concern in Washington and across the United States as fire seasons get longer due to drought and climate change. HB 1522 improves the safety of electric utility infrastructure and reduces the risk of wildfires. This bill gives the Utilities and Transportation Commission more ability to help utilities improve their wildfire mitigation plans. Great to sign Rep. Tom Dent’s 4th bill this session into law. Grateful to him and companion sponsor Sen. Mike Chapman.

Governor Bob Ferguson

17,994 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Dr. Michael Yeadon Exposes the Foundational Lie of Climate Alarmism What if everything you’ve been told about climate change is not just exaggerated, but a deliberate, orchestrated lie? Former Pfizer VP & Chief Scientist Dr. Michael Yeadon delivers a stunning, evidence-based takedown of the climate change narrative that will make you question everything. He begins by tracing the origins. “If you do nothing else, have a look at the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission,” Dr. Yeadon states. “Honestly, things like climate change and pandemic diseases were decided to be used by people concerned about population... They decided at the same time to frighten you with diseases and changes to climate. It's the same group of people at the same time. And after that, there was a diaspora of propaganda.” But what about the science? Dr. Yeadon, an expert in parsing complex data, did his own research. “I found at least three or four people who've spent longer in atmospheric science than I've spent in pharma R&D. And there is no question that there is no significant change to the climate since pre-industrial times.” He dismantles the core data itself. “Where do you think they got the temperature data from when there were virtually no thermometers? They weren't calibrated. No one checked the records. This idea that they know it's 1.5 degrees warmer? It's a lie.” Then, he goes for the jugular: the alleged link between CO2 and temperature. “There is no connection between CO2 in the air and the temperature of the surface... We don't live in a greenhouse. A greenhouse is a closed system. Our atmosphere is open; energy radiates back into space.” The proof? Ice core data. “What several independent groups all show is that changes in temperature ALWAYS preceded change in atmospheric CO2. CO2 moves in response to temperature. Warm water holds less CO2. Everyone knows a warm fizzy drink goes flat. It’s basic science.” His conclusion is unequivocal: “When the Earth warms due to changes in solar output or orbital cycles, the CO2 movement takes place afterwards. All of this fear-mongering about burning fossil fuels adding CO2 and changing the climate? It is a lie. They're lying to you to frighten you and to get you to accept restrictions on your life.” This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a call for intellectual honesty from a renowned scientist. It’s time to stop being frightened by a crisis that doesn’t exist. Share if you’re ready to question the narrative. Follow for more unflinching analysis from world-class experts.

Dr. Michael Yeadon Exposes the Foundational Lie of Climate Alarmism What if everything you’ve been told about climate change is not just exaggerated, but a deliberate, orchestrated lie? Former Pfizer VP & Chief Scientist Dr. Michael Yeadon delivers a stunning, evidence-based takedown of the climate change narrative that will make you question everything. He begins by tracing the origins. “If you do nothing else, have a look at the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission,” Dr. Yeadon states. “Honestly, things like climate change and pandemic diseases were decided to be used by people concerned about population... They decided at the same time to frighten you with diseases and changes to climate. It's the same group of people at the same time. And after that, there was a diaspora of propaganda.” But what about the science? Dr. Yeadon, an expert in parsing complex data, did his own research. “I found at least three or four people who've spent longer in atmospheric science than I've spent in pharma R&D. And there is no question that there is no significant change to the climate since pre-industrial times.” He dismantles the core data itself. “Where do you think they got the temperature data from when there were virtually no thermometers? They weren't calibrated. No one checked the records. This idea that they know it's 1.5 degrees warmer? It's a lie.” Then, he goes for the jugular: the alleged link between CO2 and temperature. “There is no connection between CO2 in the air and the temperature of the surface... We don't live in a greenhouse. A greenhouse is a closed system. Our atmosphere is open; energy radiates back into space.” The proof? Ice core data. “What several independent groups all show is that changes in temperature ALWAYS preceded change in atmospheric CO2. CO2 moves in response to temperature. Warm water holds less CO2. Everyone knows a warm fizzy drink goes flat. It’s basic science.” His conclusion is unequivocal: “When the Earth warms due to changes in solar output or orbital cycles, the CO2 movement takes place afterwards. All of this fear-mongering about burning fossil fuels adding CO2 and changing the climate? It is a lie. They're lying to you to frighten you and to get you to accept restrictions on your life.” This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a call for intellectual honesty from a renowned scientist. It’s time to stop being frightened by a crisis that doesn’t exist. Share if you’re ready to question the narrative. Follow for more unflinching analysis from world-class experts.

Camus

20,811 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Water Convention, a UN body under United Nations economic commission for Europe has introduced many technology /AI based interventions for management of shared river basins worldwide . UN needs frameworks for enforcement of internationally recognised bilateral or multilateral treaties on shared rivers and related legal structures . This is becoming increasingly critical for sustaining fundamental purpose of the UN ; to promote peace and cooperation amongst the nation states . Weaponisation of water by India will lead to an illegal and dangerous precedent by an upper riparian which the international system can ill afford while preparing to handle impacts of climate change .

Water Convention, a UN body under United Nations economic commission for Europe has introduced many technology /AI based interventions for management of shared river basins worldwide . UN needs frameworks for enforcement of internationally recognised bilateral or multilateral treaties on shared rivers and related legal structures . This is becoming increasingly critical for sustaining fundamental purpose of the UN ; to promote peace and cooperation amongst the nation states . Weaponisation of water by India will lead to an illegal and dangerous precedent by an upper riparian which the international system can ill afford while preparing to handle impacts of climate change .

Lt Gen Saeed (retd)

15,449 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Climate change is an existential threat to civilization and humankind, according to top scientists, journalists, and policymakers. They say that planetary warming caused by human emissions is making forest fires, hurricanes, and floods more frequent, worse, and more widespread; reducing arctic ice and submerging atoll islands; killing the coral on the Great Barrier Reef; worsening heatwaves and reducing crop yields. Former President Biden said climate change is “an existential threat to all of us,” and scientists and environmentalists say “one billion” to “billions” will die from food shortages and other climate impacts. But those claims are all nonsense. Climate change is real, but there was never any scientific evidence that it posed a threat to civilization and humankind. The area of Earth on fire has declined for decades, and what determines whether there are high-intensity fires is forest management and other forms of fire protection. There is no increase in hurricane frequency or intensity, and flood deaths and damages are determined by infrastructure and emergency preparedness. Nearly 90 percent of atoll islands have either increased in size or stayed the same in recent decades. Arctic ice did not decline from 2000 to 2024 and likely will not decline in the coming years. Coral on the Great Barrier Reef is at a 36-year high. Crop yields continue to climb, even with higher temperatures, aided in part by greater carbon dioxide. And heat waves were far worse in the 1930s, before significant human emissions, cold deaths outnumber heat deaths, and heat deaths are easily avoidable with access to air conditioning. The claims that billions will die and that climate change poses an existential risk are thus misinformation and, often, given that many scientists know they are lying, intentional disinformation. The best available evidence suggests nobody will die from climate change. None of this means we should not worry about climate change and humankind’s contribution to it. The evidence that human emissions change the climate is overwhelming, and many climate skeptics simply go too far in dismissing rising temperatures and humankind’s contribution. We have good temperature measures on land and oceans. We have known for over a century that the accumulation of carbon dioxide traps heat and that it has increased by 50 percent since the pre-industrial period, and the fact that it is a small amount of Earth’s atmosphere by volume does not erase its contribution to warming. And, all else being equal, we should not want any change to average global temperatures since humankind created agricultural, urban, and environmental systems to function within today’s moderate temperature band. But scientists, journalists, and activists have so wildly overstated the claims of climate change that they must at this point be considered lies, given their discrepancy with known scientific facts and highly visible realities. Sea levels have been rising since the mid-19th Century, and there is no scientific evidence that their rise has accelerated since emissions grew significantly after World War II, and the scientists who claim otherwise are manipulating their models to show acceleration when they can just as scientifically show deceleration. Given how clear the data are on climate change’s alleged impacts, the claims to the contrary by scientists, journalists, and activists cannot be attributed to ignorance. Moreover, there is strong evidence of deliberate deception. I recently documented how a top sea level rise scientist, Robert Kopp of Rutgers, engages in deception. The leading global organization that tracks disasters abruptly and inappropriately changed its methodology after climate expert Roger Pielke, Jr. showed that they had declined from 2000 to 2021. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration gave the false impression that disasters that cost over $1 billion were increasing and then abruptly ended its “Billion-Dollar Disasters Database” after Pielke showed how it had manipulated the numbers. Because the data clearly show that climate change is not an existential threat, scientists, politicians, and journalists have misrepresented practically every aspect of the issue. Carbon emissions are largely flat over the last decade and there is simply no conceivable way that humankind will produce high enough emissions to meet the wildly high “RCP 8.5” scenario upon which most of the alarmist predictions of future climate impacts show. What’s more, scientists know this perfectly well as Pielke and other scientists have documented abundant natural gas and slower than predicted economic growth and population growth will prevent it. “RCP8.5 is not simply ‘highly unlikely’” explained Pielke recently, “it is falsified, meaning that its emissions trajectory is already well out of step with reality. We showed this conclusively” in recent studies. And yet scientists continue to use the alarmist RCP 8.5 model for the simple fact that the other models simply aren’t alarmist enough. Why have scientists, politicians, and journalists repeated false and often apocalyptic claims for so long? And how were they able to get away with it? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, to read the whole article, and watch the full video! Full version:

Climate change is an existential threat to civilization and humankind, according to top scientists, journalists, and policymakers. They say that planetary warming caused by human emissions is making forest fires, hurricanes, and floods more frequent, worse, and more widespread; reducing arctic ice and submerging atoll islands; killing the coral on the Great Barrier Reef; worsening heatwaves and reducing crop yields. Former President Biden said climate change is “an existential threat to all of us,” and scientists and environmentalists say “one billion” to “billions” will die from food shortages and other climate impacts. But those claims are all nonsense. Climate change is real, but there was never any scientific evidence that it posed a threat to civilization and humankind. The area of Earth on fire has declined for decades, and what determines whether there are high-intensity fires is forest management and other forms of fire protection. There is no increase in hurricane frequency or intensity, and flood deaths and damages are determined by infrastructure and emergency preparedness. Nearly 90 percent of atoll islands have either increased in size or stayed the same in recent decades. Arctic ice did not decline from 2000 to 2024 and likely will not decline in the coming years. Coral on the Great Barrier Reef is at a 36-year high. Crop yields continue to climb, even with higher temperatures, aided in part by greater carbon dioxide. And heat waves were far worse in the 1930s, before significant human emissions, cold deaths outnumber heat deaths, and heat deaths are easily avoidable with access to air conditioning. The claims that billions will die and that climate change poses an existential risk are thus misinformation and, often, given that many scientists know they are lying, intentional disinformation. The best available evidence suggests nobody will die from climate change. None of this means we should not worry about climate change and humankind’s contribution to it. The evidence that human emissions change the climate is overwhelming, and many climate skeptics simply go too far in dismissing rising temperatures and humankind’s contribution. We have good temperature measures on land and oceans. We have known for over a century that the accumulation of carbon dioxide traps heat and that it has increased by 50 percent since the pre-industrial period, and the fact that it is a small amount of Earth’s atmosphere by volume does not erase its contribution to warming. And, all else being equal, we should not want any change to average global temperatures since humankind created agricultural, urban, and environmental systems to function within today’s moderate temperature band. But scientists, journalists, and activists have so wildly overstated the claims of climate change that they must at this point be considered lies, given their discrepancy with known scientific facts and highly visible realities. Sea levels have been rising since the mid-19th Century, and there is no scientific evidence that their rise has accelerated since emissions grew significantly after World War II, and the scientists who claim otherwise are manipulating their models to show acceleration when they can just as scientifically show deceleration. Given how clear the data are on climate change’s alleged impacts, the claims to the contrary by scientists, journalists, and activists cannot be attributed to ignorance. Moreover, there is strong evidence of deliberate deception. I recently documented how a top sea level rise scientist, Robert Kopp of Rutgers, engages in deception. The leading global organization that tracks disasters abruptly and inappropriately changed its methodology after climate expert Roger Pielke, Jr. showed that they had declined from 2000 to 2021. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration gave the false impression that disasters that cost over $1 billion were increasing and then abruptly ended its “Billion-Dollar Disasters Database” after Pielke showed how it had manipulated the numbers. Because the data clearly show that climate change is not an existential threat, scientists, politicians, and journalists have misrepresented practically every aspect of the issue. Carbon emissions are largely flat over the last decade and there is simply no conceivable way that humankind will produce high enough emissions to meet the wildly high “RCP 8.5” scenario upon which most of the alarmist predictions of future climate impacts show. What’s more, scientists know this perfectly well as Pielke and other scientists have documented abundant natural gas and slower than predicted economic growth and population growth will prevent it. “RCP8.5 is not simply ‘highly unlikely’” explained Pielke recently, “it is falsified, meaning that its emissions trajectory is already well out of step with reality. We showed this conclusively” in recent studies. And yet scientists continue to use the alarmist RCP 8.5 model for the simple fact that the other models simply aren’t alarmist enough. Why have scientists, politicians, and journalists repeated false and often apocalyptic claims for so long? And how were they able to get away with it? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, to read the whole article, and watch the full video! Full version:

Michael Shellenberger

114,237 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce