Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Abdominal CT Tutorials - Pyelonephritis versus renal infarct (1/2) Classic uncomplicated pyelonephritis Coronal + liver windows are very helpful Radiopaedia.org case link:

Michael Hartung

4,374 subscribers

19,028 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Sağlık & İyilik Eğitim Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

2 Yorum

Michael Hartung profil fotoğrafı

Michael Hartung1 yıl önce

(2/2) Renal infarction @Radiopaedia Case link:

Michael Hartung profil fotoğrafı

Michael Hartung1 yıl önce

For more video lessons with scrollable cases, quizzes, and review sets, check out my course: #FOAMed #MedEd #FOAMRad #RadEd #RadRes #radiology #EmergencyMedicine

Benzer Videolar

Abdominal CT Tutorials - Liver tumors (1/2) Classic HCC with CT and MRI Scroll through the case on Radiopaedia.org: #FOAMed #MedEd #FOAMRad #RadEd #RadRes #radiology #EmergencyMedicine

Abdominal CT Tutorials - Liver tumors (1/2) Classic HCC with CT and MRI Scroll through the case on Radiopaedia.org: #FOAMed #MedEd #FOAMRad #RadEd #RadRes #radiology #EmergencyMedicine

Michael Hartung

14,047 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Abdominal CT Tutorials - Pancreatic adenocarcinoma Double duct sign! Radiopaedia.org case link: Complete abdominal CT course: #FOAMed #MedEd #FOAMRad #RadEd #RadRes #radiology #EmergencyMedicine

Abdominal CT Tutorials - Pancreatic adenocarcinoma Double duct sign! Radiopaedia.org case link: Complete abdominal CT course: #FOAMed #MedEd #FOAMRad #RadEd #RadRes #radiology #EmergencyMedicine

Michael Hartung

13,832 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Abdominal CT Tutorials - Mesenteric ischemia (1/2) SMA embolus it's often hard to see what's not there... Case link:

Abdominal CT Tutorials - Mesenteric ischemia (1/2) SMA embolus it's often hard to see what's not there... Case link:

Michael Hartung

18,001 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Abdominal CT Tutorials - Pancreatitis (1/2) Gallstone pancreatitis While not particularly common, it is always satisfying to diagnose choledocholithiasis on CT Case link:

Abdominal CT Tutorials - Pancreatitis (1/2) Gallstone pancreatitis While not particularly common, it is always satisfying to diagnose choledocholithiasis on CT Case link:

Michael Hartung

19,103 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

PSA: General-purpose multimodal models, like Gemini 2.0, Grok-2, and GPT-4o are NOT good at interpreting medical images. This is expected, as they were not trained for this purpose. Last week, I shared a video of Gemini 2.0 Realtime looking at a CT that went viral. It was an extremely simple case (Case 1 in my call prep course on Navigating Radiology), and I asked very simple questions. Given the context - screensharing with a general model - I was genuinely impressed that it could identify some very basic anatomy and an abnormal pancreas in realtime! The video demonstrated the power of interacting with AI this way, and the potential for future medical-specific models to be used similarly. BUT many reposts of the video perpetuated misconceptions: AI replacing radiologists, Grok can read your scans, etc. Naturally, this video will likely not go viral, but here’s an example of what frequently happens with general-purpose models: many basic errors (calling the prostate the bladder, and the bladder the uterus), seeing masses that don't exist, etc - often probabilistic based on context. That said, interacting with LLMs real time with screensharing IS a very cool unlock, with a lot of potential. Very exciting!

PSA: General-purpose multimodal models, like Gemini 2.0, Grok-2, and GPT-4o are NOT good at interpreting medical images. This is expected, as they were not trained for this purpose. Last week, I shared a video of Gemini 2.0 Realtime looking at a CT that went viral. It was an extremely simple case (Case 1 in my call prep course on Navigating Radiology), and I asked very simple questions. Given the context - screensharing with a general model - I was genuinely impressed that it could identify some very basic anatomy and an abnormal pancreas in realtime! The video demonstrated the power of interacting with AI this way, and the potential for future medical-specific models to be used similarly. BUT many reposts of the video perpetuated misconceptions: AI replacing radiologists, Grok can read your scans, etc. Naturally, this video will likely not go viral, but here’s an example of what frequently happens with general-purpose models: many basic errors (calling the prostate the bladder, and the bladder the uterus), seeing masses that don't exist, etc - often probabilistic based on context. That said, interacting with LLMs real time with screensharing IS a very cool unlock, with a lot of potential. Very exciting!

Rajesh Bhayana

21,663 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

How to determine exactly which local business to start in less than 4 minutes. No exaggeration, watch the video! If you're into text, these are the 4 steps: 1 Pick 4-6 industries. In this case, landscaping, roofing, plumbing & electrical 2 Pick a city to run a scrape 3 Run the scrape with exact match categories only 4 Open an excel pivot table to see how the # of local businesses compare against the national average Everything is shown in the video, step by step. Run the scrape with this tool: (yes, that's an affiliate link. I'll make a whopping $1-3 if you use it and you'll save 20%. sue me!) Use this link to see the list of google maps categories, sorted by the ones that appear most to least often: - Insanely helpful. If this doesn't make sense then the short video below will. This tweet only took ~15 mins to write but 15 years to learn. You can say thanks with a follow, comment or share Chris Koerner

How to determine exactly which local business to start in less than 4 minutes. No exaggeration, watch the video! If you're into text, these are the 4 steps: 1 Pick 4-6 industries. In this case, landscaping, roofing, plumbing & electrical 2 Pick a city to run a scrape 3 Run the scrape with exact match categories only 4 Open an excel pivot table to see how the # of local businesses compare against the national average Everything is shown in the video, step by step. Run the scrape with this tool: (yes, that's an affiliate link. I'll make a whopping $1-3 if you use it and you'll save 20%. sue me!) Use this link to see the list of google maps categories, sorted by the ones that appear most to least often: - Insanely helpful. If this doesn't make sense then the short video below will. This tweet only took ~15 mins to write but 15 years to learn. You can say thanks with a follow, comment or share Chris Koerner

Chris Koerner

133,275 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🚨Dr. William Makis: Ivermectin Dosing for Cancer Explained In one of his recent talks, Dr. William Makis shared what he considers the most important dosing guide for using Ivermectin in cancer. According to Dr. Makis, the starting dose for most cancers is 1 mg per kilogram of body weight per day For example, a person weighing 60 kg would take 60 mg daily, that’s five 12 mg pills or roughly one teaspoon (6 ml) of liquid ivermectin. He mentioned that Ivermectin has shown positive effects in many types of cancer, including: - Breast cancer - Colon cancer - Lung cancer - Pancreatic cancer - Gastric cancer - Renal cell carcinoma - Leukemias He noted that there is very little research on lymphomas, but that doesn’t mean it won’t work, it simply hasn’t been studied much yet. Important points from Dr. Makis: 1) The anti-cancer effect of Ivermectin appears to be dose dependent. 2) Higher doses may offer better results in more aggressive cancers. 3) For very aggressive cancers (such as pancreatic, leukemia, or brain cancers), he suggests considering 2 mg/kg or even up to 2.5 mg/kg per day. Some patients have used these higher doses for many months with only temporary side effects (such as mild visual disturbances that usually resolve within a few days). Real-world examples include a prostate cancer patient whose PSA dropped from 89 to 11 on 45 mg daily, and a terminal gallbladder cancer case that resolved after 14 months on 2 mg/kg. Dr. Makis emphasizes that Ivermectin is a very safe drug with no reported long-term side effects at 1 mg/kg. He recommends starting at this dose and adjusting upwards depending on the individual case and cancer type. He also stresses that people can safely stay on Ivermectin for months as long as there is active disease. If you're researching Ivermectin for cancer protocols, many people are choosing GENIX MEDS for clean, pharmaceutical-grade Ivermectin with straightforward worldwide delivery. #Ivermectindosage #MakisMD #Genixmeds

🚨Dr. William Makis: Ivermectin Dosing for Cancer Explained In one of his recent talks, Dr. William Makis shared what he considers the most important dosing guide for using Ivermectin in cancer. According to Dr. Makis, the starting dose for most cancers is 1 mg per kilogram of body weight per day For example, a person weighing 60 kg would take 60 mg daily, that’s five 12 mg pills or roughly one teaspoon (6 ml) of liquid ivermectin. He mentioned that Ivermectin has shown positive effects in many types of cancer, including: - Breast cancer - Colon cancer - Lung cancer - Pancreatic cancer - Gastric cancer - Renal cell carcinoma - Leukemias He noted that there is very little research on lymphomas, but that doesn’t mean it won’t work, it simply hasn’t been studied much yet. Important points from Dr. Makis: 1) The anti-cancer effect of Ivermectin appears to be dose dependent. 2) Higher doses may offer better results in more aggressive cancers. 3) For very aggressive cancers (such as pancreatic, leukemia, or brain cancers), he suggests considering 2 mg/kg or even up to 2.5 mg/kg per day. Some patients have used these higher doses for many months with only temporary side effects (such as mild visual disturbances that usually resolve within a few days). Real-world examples include a prostate cancer patient whose PSA dropped from 89 to 11 on 45 mg daily, and a terminal gallbladder cancer case that resolved after 14 months on 2 mg/kg. Dr. Makis emphasizes that Ivermectin is a very safe drug with no reported long-term side effects at 1 mg/kg. He recommends starting at this dose and adjusting upwards depending on the individual case and cancer type. He also stresses that people can safely stay on Ivermectin for months as long as there is active disease. If you're researching Ivermectin for cancer protocols, many people are choosing GENIX MEDS for clean, pharmaceutical-grade Ivermectin with straightforward worldwide delivery. #Ivermectindosage #MakisMD #Genixmeds

GENIX MEDS

20,168 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

After a year of research, Dr. William Makis says this is the most important graph of his career. The ivermectin dosing schedule for cancer. For most cancers breast, colon, lung, pancreatic, renal, gastric, leukemias: Start at 1 mg per kg of body weight per day. For a 60 kg person: 60 mg daily. That's five 12 mg pills, or 6 mL of liquid. The evidence he cites is dose-dependent: 📉 Dr. Shankara Chetty prostate cancer patient's PSA dropped from 89 to 11 on 45 mg/day 📉 Dr. Tess Lawrie ovarian cancer marker CA-125 dropped from 288 to 22 on just 0.2 mg/kg 🧒 Castro study children with leukemia, no side effects after 6 months at 1 mg/kg For aggressive cancers (pancreatic, brain), the blood-brain barrier may need more: 🔹 Dr. Landrito's colleague — terminal gallbladder cancer, cancer disappeared after 14 months at 2 mg/kg/day 🔹 Highest documented dose: 2.5 mg/kg (Dr. Chetty) only transient visual side effects that resolved Why won't oncology offer this? Ivermectin is generic. Off-patent. Unprofitable. No funded trials. No incentive. No profit. Dr. Makis's conclusion: "Using ivermectin in cancer is honestly very straightforward. It is a very, very safe drug." He suggests starting at 1 mg/kg/day. It can be taken for many months even over a year with an excellent safety profile based on long-term anecdotal evidence. The power to fight may already be on your shelf. ⚠️ Not medical advice these are case reports and anecdotal evidence, not completed clinical trials. Never self-prescribe. Work with a doctor who listens.

TheSkyMeds | Cancer & Parasites Explained

12,533 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

Dangers of coffee? Once again, the Sattvic Movement has outdone itself with this utter nonsense of a video that misleads public on coffee. The Sattvic Movement is a pseudo-intellectual, pseudo-scientific, spinal-level thinking nationalistic activism from a scientifically illiterate couple, that is leveraged on peddling anti-science concepts, demonizing scientific progression, misinterpreting evidence, and misrepresenting clinical data all the while promoting ancient and primitive superstition written in the religious texts of Ayurveda which promotes culture-traditional dogmatism in healthcare. Even a grade 4 glioblastoma is not as malignant as Sattvic Movement is to India’s scientific temper. In this video, Lady Sattvic speaks about three “facts” on why coffee is dangerous. 1/ Coffee is just for energizing temporarily and then people who drink coffee become lethargic. 2/ People get physically and psychologically dependent on coffee. 3/ Coffee dehydrates and destroys the lining of the stomach and causes constipation. Her solution: Have warm herbal teas! These statements are proof that mental constipation leads to verbal diarrhea and none of these are true. Coffee does not produce a jerk and flaccid response in the nervous system, but caffeine may. In fact, coffee as a dietary supplement for health/disease is one of the most scientifically studied aspects in clinical medicine. Three cups of black coffee without milk or sugar daily have immense health benefits that you need to know about! The Sattvic Movement is just peddling a whole bunch of lies. Coffee is significantly beneficial for the liver: it reduces fatty liver disease, reduced progression of fatty liver disease, reduces risk of developing cirrhosis and reduces risk of liver cancer development. See here here and here Coffee consumption does not only reduce risk of liver cancer, but also breast and endometrial cancer in women, colorectal and prostate cancers in men, reduces risk of dying from all causes, especially metabolic diseases such as diabetes and heart diseases and reduces risk of developing diabetes type 2 and Parkinson’s disease. See here here here People do not get dependent on coffee, but caffeine. Do you know what else contains caffeine apart from coffee? Tea and chocolates. Yes. Dark chocolate contains 43g of caffeine in 100g, coffee contains 20-40g depending on preparatory methods and tea contains 11g caffeine in 100g. So, is shifting to tea the solution to prevent caffeine dependency? Nope. Avoiding caffeinated products is. What does that mean? It means that decaffeinated coffee is as good as whole coffee, because the “goodness and benefits on health” of coffee is not dependent on caffeine, but polyenol compounds in coffee. See here and here And guess what, coffee and caffeine consumption was also significantly associated with decreased risk of depression. Yes, see here: and hey also this – coffee intake was associated with lower incidence of chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease and protein loss in urine. Damn. Coffee is the superhero we all need! See here - So go ahead and enjoy some raw and real/or decaff that will increase longevity, reduce heart and metabolic diseases, cancers and reduce risk of developing degenerative brain diseases. Ok, so what about herbal teas? It is a bummer. There is absolutely no evidence from clinical studies to showcase that herbal teas are useful for anything other than featuring in misleading, stupid Instagram reels. But wait, there is more on herbal teas. Herbal teas are not all that safe. Herbal teas, especially green tea extract infusions were associated with liver injury, liver failure and death or organ transplantation. The European Union warned and limited the use of green tea extracts in foods fearing liver damage among consumers. See here and here And if you look at benefits of herbal teas versus adverse events of herbal teas in published literature, you will see that adverse events feature more. Herbal teas have caused liver injury, liver failure, multiple organ failure, accelerated hypertension, paralysis, chronic liver injury, heart failure, brain strokes and brain failure and so much more in humans! See this link: Oh, by the way, coffee does not increase blood pressure. In fact, it lowers it. So do not be too miserable on that. In habitual coffee users (3-5 cups a day), coffee had benefits on blood pressure parameters. Do not believe me? See here: and about that destroying stomach lining and causing constipation – that was just bluff from the annoyingly sounding Lady Sattvic. See here But is coffee safe for all? No. Pregnant women, please avoid more than 1-2 cups a day. See here: So, what is this Sattvic Movement all about? It is all about destroying the scientific temperament of the public in India and by misleading the public, they are creating more patients for the modern medicine hospitals to treat. Are they funded by Big Pharma? Hmmm, I wonder. I am going to think that over a hot cup of black coffee. I think you should too! And don’t forget to share this information with your herbal tea lover friends!

Dangers of coffee? Once again, the Sattvic Movement has outdone itself with this utter nonsense of a video that misleads public on coffee. The Sattvic Movement is a pseudo-intellectual, pseudo-scientific, spinal-level thinking nationalistic activism from a scientifically illiterate couple, that is leveraged on peddling anti-science concepts, demonizing scientific progression, misinterpreting evidence, and misrepresenting clinical data all the while promoting ancient and primitive superstition written in the religious texts of Ayurveda which promotes culture-traditional dogmatism in healthcare. Even a grade 4 glioblastoma is not as malignant as Sattvic Movement is to India’s scientific temper. In this video, Lady Sattvic speaks about three “facts” on why coffee is dangerous. 1/ Coffee is just for energizing temporarily and then people who drink coffee become lethargic. 2/ People get physically and psychologically dependent on coffee. 3/ Coffee dehydrates and destroys the lining of the stomach and causes constipation. Her solution: Have warm herbal teas! These statements are proof that mental constipation leads to verbal diarrhea and none of these are true. Coffee does not produce a jerk and flaccid response in the nervous system, but caffeine may. In fact, coffee as a dietary supplement for health/disease is one of the most scientifically studied aspects in clinical medicine. Three cups of black coffee without milk or sugar daily have immense health benefits that you need to know about! The Sattvic Movement is just peddling a whole bunch of lies. Coffee is significantly beneficial for the liver: it reduces fatty liver disease, reduced progression of fatty liver disease, reduces risk of developing cirrhosis and reduces risk of liver cancer development. See here here and here Coffee consumption does not only reduce risk of liver cancer, but also breast and endometrial cancer in women, colorectal and prostate cancers in men, reduces risk of dying from all causes, especially metabolic diseases such as diabetes and heart diseases and reduces risk of developing diabetes type 2 and Parkinson’s disease. See here here here People do not get dependent on coffee, but caffeine. Do you know what else contains caffeine apart from coffee? Tea and chocolates. Yes. Dark chocolate contains 43g of caffeine in 100g, coffee contains 20-40g depending on preparatory methods and tea contains 11g caffeine in 100g. So, is shifting to tea the solution to prevent caffeine dependency? Nope. Avoiding caffeinated products is. What does that mean? It means that decaffeinated coffee is as good as whole coffee, because the “goodness and benefits on health” of coffee is not dependent on caffeine, but polyenol compounds in coffee. See here and here And guess what, coffee and caffeine consumption was also significantly associated with decreased risk of depression. Yes, see here: and hey also this – coffee intake was associated with lower incidence of chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease and protein loss in urine. Damn. Coffee is the superhero we all need! See here - So go ahead and enjoy some raw and real/or decaff that will increase longevity, reduce heart and metabolic diseases, cancers and reduce risk of developing degenerative brain diseases. Ok, so what about herbal teas? It is a bummer. There is absolutely no evidence from clinical studies to showcase that herbal teas are useful for anything other than featuring in misleading, stupid Instagram reels. But wait, there is more on herbal teas. Herbal teas are not all that safe. Herbal teas, especially green tea extract infusions were associated with liver injury, liver failure and death or organ transplantation. The European Union warned and limited the use of green tea extracts in foods fearing liver damage among consumers. See here and here And if you look at benefits of herbal teas versus adverse events of herbal teas in published literature, you will see that adverse events feature more. Herbal teas have caused liver injury, liver failure, multiple organ failure, accelerated hypertension, paralysis, chronic liver injury, heart failure, brain strokes and brain failure and so much more in humans! See this link: Oh, by the way, coffee does not increase blood pressure. In fact, it lowers it. So do not be too miserable on that. In habitual coffee users (3-5 cups a day), coffee had benefits on blood pressure parameters. Do not believe me? See here: and about that destroying stomach lining and causing constipation – that was just bluff from the annoyingly sounding Lady Sattvic. See here But is coffee safe for all? No. Pregnant women, please avoid more than 1-2 cups a day. See here: So, what is this Sattvic Movement all about? It is all about destroying the scientific temperament of the public in India and by misleading the public, they are creating more patients for the modern medicine hospitals to treat. Are they funded by Big Pharma? Hmmm, I wonder. I am going to think that over a hot cup of black coffee. I think you should too! And don’t forget to share this information with your herbal tea lover friends!

TheLiverDoc™

359,958 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Dwarkesh's 'agent civilizations' blog post has divided the internet. Is this a helpful and methodical look behind the curtain at the OpenAI/Hugging Face breach? Or is this more of a hysterical AI Doomerism that will ultimately be used to make the case for banning data centers? Or BOTH? Plus, an electric plane that only needs $5 to fill up its battery, why rich founders should pick up a side quest, and the Bittensor subnet that's more effective than Fable 5 at sniffing out vulnerabilities." 0:00 Guest introductions 2:58 OpenClaw 2.0 5:11 "Agents ARE AI" 7:27 Billy: OpenClaw is still too technical for business users 9:00 Slack Code, and collaborative prompting 10:40 Multi-agent orchestration and Stripe's "minions" 14:13 Slack's moat, switching costs, and the Salesforce rebound 15:11 Jason's "Oracle": a heads-up display for the whole company 18:42 The Hugging Face breach: who's responsible when agents go rogue? 19:42 Perplexity launches Hybrid Compute — local models on your Mac 21:39 Why unmetered local tokens change corporate behavior 26:57 Gatik's Autonomous Vehicle AI Stack 32:22 Jason's Tesla FSD stories 34:05 Are AV companies being pushed to move too fast? 41:38 Trucking is a "have to have," robotaxis are a "nice to have" 42:36 Jason's fix: a safety driver for the first million rides 46:50 Why physical AI's adoption curve runs in decades 52:21 Anthropic's Model Hardware Standard (MHS), explained 1:06:27 How Jason got onion rings on the menu at Buck's of Woodside 1:09:05 AI detectors under fire: Pangram, MIT, and the handwritten diary 1:15:20 Why AI is "very mid" at writing (it learned from the average) 1:17:11 The Orin Kerr test: Pangram catches Claude writing as Kerr 1:28:35 Micro Duck and designing robots with Claude 1:29:42 Phil Kaplan's $14 custom circuit boards 🎥 Watch the full episode here 👇

Dwarkesh's 'agent civilizations' blog post has divided the internet. Is this a helpful and methodical look behind the curtain at the OpenAI/Hugging Face breach? Or is this more of a hysterical AI Doomerism that will ultimately be used to make the case for banning data centers? Or BOTH? Plus, an electric plane that only needs $5 to fill up its battery, why rich founders should pick up a side quest, and the Bittensor subnet that's more effective than Fable 5 at sniffing out vulnerabilities." 0:00 Guest introductions 2:58 OpenClaw 2.0 5:11 "Agents ARE AI" 7:27 Billy: OpenClaw is still too technical for business users 9:00 Slack Code, and collaborative prompting 10:40 Multi-agent orchestration and Stripe's "minions" 14:13 Slack's moat, switching costs, and the Salesforce rebound 15:11 Jason's "Oracle": a heads-up display for the whole company 18:42 The Hugging Face breach: who's responsible when agents go rogue? 19:42 Perplexity launches Hybrid Compute — local models on your Mac 21:39 Why unmetered local tokens change corporate behavior 26:57 Gatik's Autonomous Vehicle AI Stack 32:22 Jason's Tesla FSD stories 34:05 Are AV companies being pushed to move too fast? 41:38 Trucking is a "have to have," robotaxis are a "nice to have" 42:36 Jason's fix: a safety driver for the first million rides 46:50 Why physical AI's adoption curve runs in decades 52:21 Anthropic's Model Hardware Standard (MHS), explained 1:06:27 How Jason got onion rings on the menu at Buck's of Woodside 1:09:05 AI detectors under fire: Pangram, MIT, and the handwritten diary 1:15:20 Why AI is "very mid" at writing (it learned from the average) 1:17:11 The Orin Kerr test: Pangram catches Claude writing as Kerr 1:28:35 Micro Duck and designing robots with Claude 1:29:42 Phil Kaplan's $14 custom circuit boards 🎥 Watch the full episode here 👇

This Week in AI

22,178 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

Toxic Playgrounds...Cancer Increases 10 Times When Grass Is Replaced With 'Rubber Tire Crumb.' "Rubber Manufacturers Call It A Success With Huge Profits, While Children Are Diagnosed With Lymphoma & Leukemia." Layne Kilpatrick Shredded Tires Contain 90+ Toxins & Heavy Metals. Rubber tires are filled with carcinogens, neurotoxins & endocrine disruptors. These are the compounds we know for sure, there are unknown compounds because manufacturers are not required by law to reveal all of the chemicals used. Rubber tire crumb contains 100s of harmful chemicals like lead, mercury, arsenic & other heavy metals, benzene, PFAS, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) & phthalates. These toxins don’t break down, they are causative for cancer (especially lymphoma & leukemia) , liver problems, thyroid issues, birth defects, kidney disease, decreased immunity & other chronic health conditions. Rubber manufacturers association considers it an absolute success story as it saves them money from disposing of the tires at landfills that they previously had to pay for & repurposed tires provides trillions of dollars in profits when cities purchase playground & sports field contracts using their rubber tire crumb. Millions of discarded tires, which are processed into shreds & tire crumb granules, previously were a huge cost in the billions, as landfills charged a fee for each & every tire discarded. This trillion dollar industry is always profits over people...& our children are paying the price. Real grass playgrounds & sports fields are safe for humans, wildlife & the environment. Natural grass has the benefit of oxygenating the air, capturing carbon & absorbing water, which reduces flooding & stormwater runoff. If you can’t avoid playgrounds & sport fields with rubber tire crumb, there are ways for reducing exposure to toxins & cancer causing chemicals: #1: Always wear shoes on rubber tire crumb & have good ventilation if you're playing on an indoor field by opening doors/windows & using fans. #2: Avoid using it for passive activities like sitting, lounging or picnicking & shake out any sports equipment bags to avoid transporting rubber tire crumb in vehicles. #3: Monitor young children to prevent ingestion of rubber & clean any cuts & abrasions with soap & water. #4: Avoid playing on rubber turf on very hot days & wash hands before eating, drinking, or adjusting mouth guards. #5: At home, take off shoes before entering to avoid tracking in rubber tire crumb, try to brush hair right away & shower as soon as possible. 👇92 Toxins Found In Rubber Tire Crumb👇 👇Artificial Turf & Rubber Tire Toxicity👇 👇The Hidden Truth Behind Rubber Playgrounds👇 Speaker: @hormonespecialist Layne Kilpatrick

Toxic Playgrounds...Cancer Increases 10 Times When Grass Is Replaced With 'Rubber Tire Crumb.' "Rubber Manufacturers Call It A Success With Huge Profits, While Children Are Diagnosed With Lymphoma & Leukemia." Layne Kilpatrick Shredded Tires Contain 90+ Toxins & Heavy Metals. Rubber tires are filled with carcinogens, neurotoxins & endocrine disruptors. These are the compounds we know for sure, there are unknown compounds because manufacturers are not required by law to reveal all of the chemicals used. Rubber tire crumb contains 100s of harmful chemicals like lead, mercury, arsenic & other heavy metals, benzene, PFAS, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) & phthalates. These toxins don’t break down, they are causative for cancer (especially lymphoma & leukemia) , liver problems, thyroid issues, birth defects, kidney disease, decreased immunity & other chronic health conditions. Rubber manufacturers association considers it an absolute success story as it saves them money from disposing of the tires at landfills that they previously had to pay for & repurposed tires provides trillions of dollars in profits when cities purchase playground & sports field contracts using their rubber tire crumb. Millions of discarded tires, which are processed into shreds & tire crumb granules, previously were a huge cost in the billions, as landfills charged a fee for each & every tire discarded. This trillion dollar industry is always profits over people...& our children are paying the price. Real grass playgrounds & sports fields are safe for humans, wildlife & the environment. Natural grass has the benefit of oxygenating the air, capturing carbon & absorbing water, which reduces flooding & stormwater runoff. If you can’t avoid playgrounds & sport fields with rubber tire crumb, there are ways for reducing exposure to toxins & cancer causing chemicals: #1: Always wear shoes on rubber tire crumb & have good ventilation if you're playing on an indoor field by opening doors/windows & using fans. #2: Avoid using it for passive activities like sitting, lounging or picnicking & shake out any sports equipment bags to avoid transporting rubber tire crumb in vehicles. #3: Monitor young children to prevent ingestion of rubber & clean any cuts & abrasions with soap & water. #4: Avoid playing on rubber turf on very hot days & wash hands before eating, drinking, or adjusting mouth guards. #5: At home, take off shoes before entering to avoid tracking in rubber tire crumb, try to brush hair right away & shower as soon as possible. 👇92 Toxins Found In Rubber Tire Crumb👇 👇Artificial Turf & Rubber Tire Toxicity👇 👇The Hidden Truth Behind Rubber Playgrounds👇 Speaker: @hormonespecialist Layne Kilpatrick

Valerie Anne Smith

154,571 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨EXPOSED: Why Is Paxlovid – Pushed for Mild COVID – Loaded with an HIV/AIDS Drug & a BLACK BOX WARNING for Deadly Interactions? Imagine popping a pill for a sniffle, only to risk heart arrhythmias, liver failure, or worse - because it supercharges your other meds like a rogue engine. That's Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) in a nutshell. The ritonavir? It's an HIV/AIDS drug, included as a 'booster' to turn your body into a drug interaction minefield. The FDA slaps a **BLACK BOX WARNING** on it, the strongest harm causing warning just shy of it being pulled from the market: "Significant drug interactions...may lead to greater exposure of certain concomitant medications, resulting in potentially severe, life-threatening, or fatal events." Contraindicated with over 100 common drugs – from statins to blood thinners – risking everything from myopathy to bleeding crises. For mild cases of COVID or influenza? The risk-reward math doesn't add up. This drug is not worth the harms. **Key Harms & Adverse Events – Don't Ignore These Red Flags:** • Virologic Rebound (COVID Returns Worse): 20% of patients (1 in 5) get rebound COVID, prolonging illness & spread. A Mass General Brigham study tracked this in real-world use, urging caution for low-risk folks. • Neurological Nightmares: Paxlovid triggers 3X more neurological adverse events than other drugs combined – think headaches, dizziness, neuropathy, even seizures in vulnerable patients. A 2025 analysis of 11,792 reports flagged this as a "strong signal." • Liver & Pancreas Damage: Hepatotoxicity is real -clinical hepatitis, jaundice reported with ritonavir. One Stanford trial noted serious hepatitis. • Kidney Strain & Failure Risk: Severe renal impairment with worsened outcomes. A 2025 cohort showed higher short- & long-term adverse events like acute injury. • Cardiac Chaos from Interactions: Ritonavir boosts antiarrhythmics like amiodarone, risking deadly QT prolongation & torsades. Contraindicated combos spike hypertension & heart events; UK MHRA alerts on this. • Severe Allergic & Skin Reactions: Anaphylaxis, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) – blistering skin peeling off in sheets. FDA logs these cases in post marketing, even after one dose; discontinue ASAP. • Gut & Sensory Torment: Dysgeusia (metallic taste, 5-6% incidence), diarrhea (3%), nausea, vomiting hit hard, tanking adherence. Nature's 2024 meta-analysis also flags elevated D-dimer (clot risk) & ALT (liver marker). • Drug-Related Problems (DRPs) Galore: A 2024 PubMed study found high frequency of severe DRPs – interactions causing toxicity or inefficacy – in 30%+ of scrips. • HIV Resistance Roulette: If undiagnosed HIV lurks, ritonavir could breed resistant strains, dooming future treatments. This isn't fearmongering – it's FDA facts & peer-reviewed red flags from 2024-2025 studies. Early treatment like any case of influenza, involves supporting the body, detox pathways & immune response. Whole food vitamin C from acerola cherry or berries, sun exposure, rest, antioxidants such as onion, garlic, bromelain & monitoring suffices without the adverse event toxic gamble. Your health isn't worth the black box bet. What did you implement to heal from COVID or other influenza symptoms? There are very highly effective natural cures & big pharma toxic antivirals are b=never needed. My husband & I used Dr Zelenko (may he RIP) protocol as both prevention & treatment. And then implemented high dose Zinc Picolinate to heal acute zinc deficiency which is the cause of losing taste/smell with all viral illnesses including COVID. Taste/smell returned in 72 hrs. Cited research linked below in replies...

🚨EXPOSED: Why Is Paxlovid – Pushed for Mild COVID – Loaded with an HIV/AIDS Drug & a BLACK BOX WARNING for Deadly Interactions? Imagine popping a pill for a sniffle, only to risk heart arrhythmias, liver failure, or worse - because it supercharges your other meds like a rogue engine. That's Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) in a nutshell. The ritonavir? It's an HIV/AIDS drug, included as a 'booster' to turn your body into a drug interaction minefield. The FDA slaps a BLACK BOX WARNING on it, the strongest harm causing warning just shy of it being pulled from the market: "Significant drug interactions...may lead to greater exposure of certain concomitant medications, resulting in potentially severe, life-threatening, or fatal events." Contraindicated with over 100 common drugs – from statins to blood thinners – risking everything from myopathy to bleeding crises. For mild cases of COVID or influenza? The risk-reward math doesn't add up. This drug is not worth the harms. Key Harms & Adverse Events – Don't Ignore These Red Flags: • Virologic Rebound (COVID Returns Worse): 20% of patients (1 in 5) get rebound COVID, prolonging illness & spread. A Mass General Brigham study tracked this in real-world use, urging caution for low-risk folks. • Neurological Nightmares: Paxlovid triggers 3X more neurological adverse events than other drugs combined – think headaches, dizziness, neuropathy, even seizures in vulnerable patients. A 2025 analysis of 11,792 reports flagged this as a "strong signal." • Liver & Pancreas Damage: Hepatotoxicity is real -clinical hepatitis, jaundice reported with ritonavir. One Stanford trial noted serious hepatitis. • Kidney Strain & Failure Risk: Severe renal impairment with worsened outcomes. A 2025 cohort showed higher short- & long-term adverse events like acute injury. • Cardiac Chaos from Interactions: Ritonavir boosts antiarrhythmics like amiodarone, risking deadly QT prolongation & torsades. Contraindicated combos spike hypertension & heart events; UK MHRA alerts on this. • Severe Allergic & Skin Reactions: Anaphylaxis, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) – blistering skin peeling off in sheets. FDA logs these cases in post marketing, even after one dose; discontinue ASAP. • Gut & Sensory Torment: Dysgeusia (metallic taste, 5-6% incidence), diarrhea (3%), nausea, vomiting hit hard, tanking adherence. Nature's 2024 meta-analysis also flags elevated D-dimer (clot risk) & ALT (liver marker). • Drug-Related Problems (DRPs) Galore: A 2024 PubMed study found high frequency of severe DRPs – interactions causing toxicity or inefficacy – in 30%+ of scrips. • HIV Resistance Roulette: If undiagnosed HIV lurks, ritonavir could breed resistant strains, dooming future treatments. This isn't fearmongering – it's FDA facts & peer-reviewed red flags from 2024-2025 studies. Early treatment like any case of influenza, involves supporting the body, detox pathways & immune response. Whole food vitamin C from acerola cherry or berries, sun exposure, rest, antioxidants such as onion, garlic, bromelain & monitoring suffices without the adverse event toxic gamble. Your health isn't worth the black box bet. What did you implement to heal from COVID or other influenza symptoms? There are very highly effective natural cures & big pharma toxic antivirals are b=never needed. My husband & I used Dr Zelenko (may he RIP) protocol as both prevention & treatment. And then implemented high dose Zinc Picolinate to heal acute zinc deficiency which is the cause of losing taste/smell with all viral illnesses including COVID. Taste/smell returned in 72 hrs. Cited research linked below in replies...

Valerie Anne Smith

46,749 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

My questions to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis ji, Housing Minister Eknath Shinde - एकनाथ शिंदे ji, and SRA CEO Dr. Mahendra Kalyankar: 👉 On what basis was Shiv Infra Vision Properties Pvt. Ltd. appointed as the developer for the massive 38-acre SRA project (Sarvadharmiya SRA CHS and 36 other CHS schemes) in Juhu Gully? 👉 What due process was followed? 👉 What is this firm’s link to a BJP leader? 👉 Was the mandatory 13(2) procedure under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act completed before changing the developer? 👉 Didn't a majority of the affected SRA societies object to this appointment? These are some of the questions I, along with my colleagues, put directly to SRA CEO Dr. Kalyankar during our meeting today. The SRA, created to safeguard the housing rights of the poor, has today become a den of corruption, brazenly siding with builders and those who wield political influence in the corridors of power. The Juhu Gully project, worth thousands of crores, involves 6,500+ slum dwellers, almost all of whom were kept in the dark before a new developer was imposed upon them. Why were they not consulted? Isn’t this a violation of their rights and the very spirit of the SRA rules? Today, most of them live under the fear of being forcefully displaced and denied their rightful in-situ rehabilitation. At the meeting, I demanded answers to these questions. We will not stop here. We will keep pursuing this case till justice is done. (1/2) #BuilderRaj #CorruptionKiBaat #PeopleVsMitrjiviSarkar #SRA #Mumbai

My questions to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis ji, Housing Minister Eknath Shinde - एकनाथ शिंदे ji, and SRA CEO Dr. Mahendra Kalyankar: 👉 On what basis was Shiv Infra Vision Properties Pvt. Ltd. appointed as the developer for the massive 38-acre SRA project (Sarvadharmiya SRA CHS and 36 other CHS schemes) in Juhu Gully? 👉 What due process was followed? 👉 What is this firm’s link to a BJP leader? 👉 Was the mandatory 13(2) procedure under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act completed before changing the developer? 👉 Didn't a majority of the affected SRA societies object to this appointment? These are some of the questions I, along with my colleagues, put directly to SRA CEO Dr. Kalyankar during our meeting today. The SRA, created to safeguard the housing rights of the poor, has today become a den of corruption, brazenly siding with builders and those who wield political influence in the corridors of power. The Juhu Gully project, worth thousands of crores, involves 6,500+ slum dwellers, almost all of whom were kept in the dark before a new developer was imposed upon them. Why were they not consulted? Isn’t this a violation of their rights and the very spirit of the SRA rules? Today, most of them live under the fear of being forcefully displaced and denied their rightful in-situ rehabilitation. At the meeting, I demanded answers to these questions. We will not stop here. We will keep pursuing this case till justice is done. (1/2) #BuilderRaj #CorruptionKiBaat #PeopleVsMitrjiviSarkar #SRA #Mumbai

Prof. Varsha Eknath Gaikwad

26,008 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

We are proud to announce WIF's brand new dAPP is LIVE on the Robinhood Chain! The first-ever DVL onchain. Huge thanks to the community for the continued support, and to the team for cooking so hard to make this happen! Things are about to get crazy... So, a few points on what makes us insanely bullish on this dAPP, and why it is good for our holders and anyone who uses it. CT is all about sharing opinions, scouting the next winner, and searching for the truth. WIF's Decentralized Voting Layer will consistently work on settling the most interesting, most discussed community questions - big questions both from within Web3 and outside of it too. All this while making it entertaining, and giving everybody a fair chance to win. New topics will be presented every week to vote on. The first event, however, will run for 2 weeks. In this case, we start with: Who is the G.O.A.T. of CT? We have 78 well-known KOLs/founders/builders from CT. Who is your favorite? Who had the largest impact on you? You get to choose. All you need to vote is 1 $WIF token = $0.00249 (current price as of 31.08.2026). We want everybody to be able to have a voice and participate. There is a Guaranteed Prize Pool of $10,000. $5,000 goes to the person who wins at the end of the 2 weeks. $5,000 goes out to 10 voters. (after votes are verified) All Creator Fees from Pons, 0.7%, go directly into the Vault, thus further increasing the Prize Pool. The Vault already holds more than $9,000 in additional rewards, bringing the total potential Prize Pool to over $19,000 at launch. Once the event reaches 10,000 verified votes, the Vault unlocks and 100% of it is added to the rewards. The Vault has no cap, and can continue growing throughout the voting period as Creator Fees grow. Prizes are not paid out in $WIF, they are paid out in ETH from our treasury. More volume = more Creator Fees = bigger Vault = more winners + a bigger G.O.A.T. Bounty. Every $WIF vote gets burned. Forever. Period. Make sure to follow so you have a say in all future topics coming up. We preach a fair world and we intend to deliver. This is why we care about our holders, our community, and everyone discovering WIF for the first time. Every decision we made was to provide a fair chance for everyone. Holders, non-holders equally. All this while keeping in mind what's best for the future growth of $WIF and our valuable community. Well, this is it. This is just the beginning of something big we strongly believe in. We intend to grow this as big as we can while always sticking to our core values. Soon, we’ll drop an article explaining everything in detail. We put the link to our dAPP in the comments, make sure it's from us. You may also find further details on the site about all mechanics and rules. Have fun, share it with your friends, and tag your favorite KOL in the comments. Bring your community with you. The more people participate, the more interesting this gets. THE WORLD IS FLAT THE WORLD IS FAIR WIF.

World is Flat

11,662 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

🚨🚨🚨 Such an important story! Jan 21, 2024, Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson (Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋), Don't forget Pfizer and the FDA tried to bury adverse events! Please watch, forward, email etc. Highlights------------------- Case 1 It's the story of Maddie, one of the children who took part in Pfizer's vaccine study on children. It's a remarkable account of what happened when Maddie got very, very sick, leading to accusations that Pfizer, the FDA and the study leaders tried to bury her case. In summer of 2020, Stephanie De Garay and her family learned an important clinical trial was about to be launched at nearby Cincinnati Children's Hospital. It would test Pfizer's experimental Covid-19 vaccine on 12 to 15 year olds to see if it was safe and effective. The De Garay's firmly pro-vaccine, didn't hesitate to let their children take part. Among three siblings, twelve year old Maddie alone was chosen to get two doses of Pfizer's vaccine, rather than a harmless placebo, it proved a fateful and debilitating roll of the dice. Her second dose was January 20 of 2021. So by the time she came home from school my husband called me at work and said, Maddie's having some sort of reaction. She had what she described as electrical shocks going up and down her spine. she said she felt like her heart was being ripped out. So chest pain, she had severe abdominal pain. She was hunched over when she walked through the door. Her toes and her fingers were white and they were like, when you touched them, they were ice cold and painful. Did you think right away that this was probably a vaccine reaction? "100%." De Garay says she was shocked when the lead study doctor offered no help. "I trusted the government. I trusted doctors. I trusted hospitals.... What I thought they were is not what they are." Case 2 Carrie Peterson Edberg's son Milo got the shot in December of 2021 and ended up with a serious heart problem that's associated with COVID vaccines. He got vaccinated on, like, a Friday. And on Sunday, he actually. Sunday morning at 01:00 a.m. Was on life support. He was diagnosed with myocarditis. doctors, of course, would not say it was vaccine-injured, but why would a six year old have myocarditis? Case 3 Daniel Hartman's 17 year old son was rushed to the hospital four days after his shot in September of 2021. My son Sean played hockey his whole life. To continue to play hockey, he had to get a vaccine. He took one Pfizer shot and died 33 days later. Answers4Sean 🇨🇦 Case 4 And 16 year old Ernesto, son of single parent Ernest Ramirez, dropped dead of an enlarged heart five days after his Pfizer Covid shot. When I got there, they were loading him up in the ambulance. I changed the ambulance to the hospital. When I got there, they were working on him at the hospital. There was a young doctor. He came out, he was. Your son's dead. You can go home. Ernest Ramirez ---------------------------------- Pfizer Cincinnati Children's Hospital and lead study scientist Dr. Robert Frenck declined comment and wouldn't answer our questions. Same with CDC, which also wouldn't tell us how many adverse event reports in children it's received for Covid vaccines. We asked federal health officials if they agree with Pfizer's published claim that, quote, there were no vaccine related serious adverse events in their study on children. But they declined to answer the question.

🚨🚨🚨 Such an important story! Jan 21, 2024, Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson (Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋), Don't forget Pfizer and the FDA tried to bury adverse events! Please watch, forward, email etc. Highlights------------------- Case 1 It's the story of Maddie, one of the children who took part in Pfizer's vaccine study on children. It's a remarkable account of what happened when Maddie got very, very sick, leading to accusations that Pfizer, the FDA and the study leaders tried to bury her case. In summer of 2020, Stephanie De Garay and her family learned an important clinical trial was about to be launched at nearby Cincinnati Children's Hospital. It would test Pfizer's experimental Covid-19 vaccine on 12 to 15 year olds to see if it was safe and effective. The De Garay's firmly pro-vaccine, didn't hesitate to let their children take part. Among three siblings, twelve year old Maddie alone was chosen to get two doses of Pfizer's vaccine, rather than a harmless placebo, it proved a fateful and debilitating roll of the dice. Her second dose was January 20 of 2021. So by the time she came home from school my husband called me at work and said, Maddie's having some sort of reaction. She had what she described as electrical shocks going up and down her spine. she said she felt like her heart was being ripped out. So chest pain, she had severe abdominal pain. She was hunched over when she walked through the door. Her toes and her fingers were white and they were like, when you touched them, they were ice cold and painful. Did you think right away that this was probably a vaccine reaction? "100%." De Garay says she was shocked when the lead study doctor offered no help. "I trusted the government. I trusted doctors. I trusted hospitals.... What I thought they were is not what they are." Case 2 Carrie Peterson Edberg's son Milo got the shot in December of 2021 and ended up with a serious heart problem that's associated with COVID vaccines. He got vaccinated on, like, a Friday. And on Sunday, he actually. Sunday morning at 01:00 a.m. Was on life support. He was diagnosed with myocarditis. doctors, of course, would not say it was vaccine-injured, but why would a six year old have myocarditis? Case 3 Daniel Hartman's 17 year old son was rushed to the hospital four days after his shot in September of 2021. My son Sean played hockey his whole life. To continue to play hockey, he had to get a vaccine. He took one Pfizer shot and died 33 days later. Answers4Sean 🇨🇦 Case 4 And 16 year old Ernesto, son of single parent Ernest Ramirez, dropped dead of an enlarged heart five days after his Pfizer Covid shot. When I got there, they were loading him up in the ambulance. I changed the ambulance to the hospital. When I got there, they were working on him at the hospital. There was a young doctor. He came out, he was. Your son's dead. You can go home. Ernest Ramirez ---------------------------------- Pfizer Cincinnati Children's Hospital and lead study scientist Dr. Robert Frenck declined comment and wouldn't answer our questions. Same with CDC, which also wouldn't tell us how many adverse event reports in children it's received for Covid vaccines. We asked federal health officials if they agree with Pfizer's published claim that, quote, there were no vaccine related serious adverse events in their study on children. But they declined to answer the question.

aussie17

71,863 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Higher deuterium in drinking water correlates with higher rates of major depression. Higher deuterium in drinking water correlates with higher rates of type 2 diabetes. This isn't a fringe hypothesis. It's a University of Utah population study mapping deuterium concentration in US tap water against disease prevalence across the country. Correlation — not proof of causation. But striking enough that Tatyana Strekalova — Clinician Scientist at Maastricht University, Senior Researcher at the University of Oxford, and Professor of Physiology at Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University — decided to test it in mice. The logic is straightforward. Deuterium concentration in drinking water decreases with distance from the ocean — inland, high-altitude water is naturally more deuterium-depleted. If geography determines deuterium load, and deuterium load correlates with disease prevalence, then what happens when you deliberately give animals water at the low end of that natural range? What her lab found is striking. They used 90 ppm deuterium-depleted water throughout — the lowest deuterium concentration found naturally in drinking water on Earth. Not a pharmaceutical dose. Not exotic laboratory depletion. And compared it to control mice drinking 140 ppm water. The difference between antarctic meltwater and coastal tap water. Finding 1: Aged mice. Two weeks. Depressive-like behaviors measurably reduced They took 18-month-old mice — equivalent to very old age, approaching maximum mouse lifespan. These mice displayed measurable depressive behaviors: Anhedonia — loss of sensitivity to reward, measured by reduced preference for sweet water. Increased helplessness behavior. Reduced novelty exploration. Impaired hippocampus-dependent memory. After two weeks on 90 ppm DDW? Sucrose preference increased — anhedonia reversed. Helplessness behavior significantly reduced. Novelty exploration improved. Hippocampal memory improved. Two weeks. Naturally occurring low-deuterium water. Measurable reversal across four independent behavioral markers. Finding 2: DDW matched antidepressant effect in stressed young mice They used a chronic stress model in young mice — predator scent, restraint stress, tail suspension. This reliably induces anhedonia in susceptible mice. Then they divided mice into three groups: normal water at 140 ppm, DDW at 90 ppm, and citalopram — a standard SSRI antidepressant. DDW produced rescue of sucrose preference comparable to citalopram. Helplessness behavior was also rescued comparably. Serotonin transporter expression — one of the key molecular targets of SSRIs — was rescued by both citalopram and DDW. This is mouse data. Direct translation to humans requires clinical trials. But the mechanism convergence is a legitimate finding. Finding 3: DDW normalized REM sleep in stressed mice Depression is the only psychiatric disorder diagnosable by a specific sleep architecture change — increased REM sleep. It's a biological marker, not a subjective report. Stressed mice showed increased REM sleep — the biological depression signature. DDW normalized REM sleep. Slow-wave sleep and wakefulness also improved. Finding 4: DDW protected against western diet-induced cognitive impairment and glucose dysregulation They used 12-month-old female mice on a standardized western diet — high saturated fat, high sugar, high cholesterol. Western diet produced: impaired glucose tolerance, brain inflammation, reduced mitochondrial markers in brain and liver, liver steatosis — fat accumulation in the liver — impaired object recognition memory, and impaired hippocampal memory. DDW at 90 ppm on western diet: Prevented glucose tolerance impairment despite continued western diet. Improved object recognition memory. Improved hippocampal memory in old mice. Did not improve liver steatosis. The liver finding matters. DDW protected the brain and metabolic glucose handling but did not reverse the liver damage. Strekalova’s interpretation: DDW is counteracting brain inflammation driven by damage elsewhere in the body — not fixing the damage itself. Finding 5: Deuterium-enriched water (180 ppm) did the opposite They tested the reverse — 180 ppm water, equivalent to what you would find in evaporative pools in the Sahara. Results on aged mice with western diet: Novelty exploration clearly suppressed. Hippocampus-dependent memory suppressed. Strekalova describes this as a surprise finding. 90 ppm sits at the low end of natural drinking water on Earth. 180 ppm sits at the high end of what occurs in extreme arid environments. The difference between them produced measurable opposing effects on memory and cognition in aged mice. Gene expression — deuterium sits upstream of circadian biology In both the aging model and the stress model, DDW altered gene expression in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Affected categories: DNA repair, oxidative stress response, immune regulation, mitochondrial function, cellular plasticity, aging-related genes. And one finding that connects directly to everything else: Per2. Per2 is a core circadian clock gene. DDW affecting its expression means deuterium content influences circadian biology at the gene level. Deuterium doesn't just affect cancer cells and mitochondrial efficiency. It sits upstream of the circadian system. The implication The deuterium content of your water varies by geography. Antarctic water versus coastal tap water. The difference is measurable. The biological effects in these models are measurable and opposing. Most people optimizing their health are tracking sleep, sunlight, training, and nutrition. Nobody told them deuterium was also on the list.

Higher deuterium in drinking water correlates with higher rates of major depression. Higher deuterium in drinking water correlates with higher rates of type 2 diabetes. This isn't a fringe hypothesis. It's a University of Utah population study mapping deuterium concentration in US tap water against disease prevalence across the country. Correlation — not proof of causation. But striking enough that Tatyana Strekalova — Clinician Scientist at Maastricht University, Senior Researcher at the University of Oxford, and Professor of Physiology at Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University — decided to test it in mice. The logic is straightforward. Deuterium concentration in drinking water decreases with distance from the ocean — inland, high-altitude water is naturally more deuterium-depleted. If geography determines deuterium load, and deuterium load correlates with disease prevalence, then what happens when you deliberately give animals water at the low end of that natural range? What her lab found is striking. They used 90 ppm deuterium-depleted water throughout — the lowest deuterium concentration found naturally in drinking water on Earth. Not a pharmaceutical dose. Not exotic laboratory depletion. And compared it to control mice drinking 140 ppm water. The difference between antarctic meltwater and coastal tap water. Finding 1: Aged mice. Two weeks. Depressive-like behaviors measurably reduced They took 18-month-old mice — equivalent to very old age, approaching maximum mouse lifespan. These mice displayed measurable depressive behaviors: Anhedonia — loss of sensitivity to reward, measured by reduced preference for sweet water. Increased helplessness behavior. Reduced novelty exploration. Impaired hippocampus-dependent memory. After two weeks on 90 ppm DDW? Sucrose preference increased — anhedonia reversed. Helplessness behavior significantly reduced. Novelty exploration improved. Hippocampal memory improved. Two weeks. Naturally occurring low-deuterium water. Measurable reversal across four independent behavioral markers. Finding 2: DDW matched antidepressant effect in stressed young mice They used a chronic stress model in young mice — predator scent, restraint stress, tail suspension. This reliably induces anhedonia in susceptible mice. Then they divided mice into three groups: normal water at 140 ppm, DDW at 90 ppm, and citalopram — a standard SSRI antidepressant. DDW produced rescue of sucrose preference comparable to citalopram. Helplessness behavior was also rescued comparably. Serotonin transporter expression — one of the key molecular targets of SSRIs — was rescued by both citalopram and DDW. This is mouse data. Direct translation to humans requires clinical trials. But the mechanism convergence is a legitimate finding. Finding 3: DDW normalized REM sleep in stressed mice Depression is the only psychiatric disorder diagnosable by a specific sleep architecture change — increased REM sleep. It's a biological marker, not a subjective report. Stressed mice showed increased REM sleep — the biological depression signature. DDW normalized REM sleep. Slow-wave sleep and wakefulness also improved. Finding 4: DDW protected against western diet-induced cognitive impairment and glucose dysregulation They used 12-month-old female mice on a standardized western diet — high saturated fat, high sugar, high cholesterol. Western diet produced: impaired glucose tolerance, brain inflammation, reduced mitochondrial markers in brain and liver, liver steatosis — fat accumulation in the liver — impaired object recognition memory, and impaired hippocampal memory. DDW at 90 ppm on western diet: Prevented glucose tolerance impairment despite continued western diet. Improved object recognition memory. Improved hippocampal memory in old mice. Did not improve liver steatosis. The liver finding matters. DDW protected the brain and metabolic glucose handling but did not reverse the liver damage. Strekalova’s interpretation: DDW is counteracting brain inflammation driven by damage elsewhere in the body — not fixing the damage itself. Finding 5: Deuterium-enriched water (180 ppm) did the opposite They tested the reverse — 180 ppm water, equivalent to what you would find in evaporative pools in the Sahara. Results on aged mice with western diet: Novelty exploration clearly suppressed. Hippocampus-dependent memory suppressed. Strekalova describes this as a surprise finding. 90 ppm sits at the low end of natural drinking water on Earth. 180 ppm sits at the high end of what occurs in extreme arid environments. The difference between them produced measurable opposing effects on memory and cognition in aged mice. Gene expression — deuterium sits upstream of circadian biology In both the aging model and the stress model, DDW altered gene expression in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Affected categories: DNA repair, oxidative stress response, immune regulation, mitochondrial function, cellular plasticity, aging-related genes. And one finding that connects directly to everything else: Per2. Per2 is a core circadian clock gene. DDW affecting its expression means deuterium content influences circadian biology at the gene level. Deuterium doesn't just affect cancer cells and mitochondrial efficiency. It sits upstream of the circadian system. The implication The deuterium content of your water varies by geography. Antarctic water versus coastal tap water. The difference is measurable. The biological effects in these models are measurable and opposing. Most people optimizing their health are tracking sleep, sunlight, training, and nutrition. Nobody told them deuterium was also on the list.

no.mind

17,344 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

7 Compelling Reasons Why Ivermectin Is a ‘Powerful Drug’ for Fighting Cancer Ivermectin is often recognized–2nd to penicillin–for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. It is safer than Tylenol and brought river blindness to the brink of extinction, but the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Well, it now turns out that ivermectin is not only an effective treatment for COVID-19, but it could also be a “powerful drug” for fighting cancer. Here are 7 reasons why. 1. Multiple Anti-Cancer Effects: Ivermectin impacts at least nine well-defined cancer targets, according to Dr. Alfonso Dueñas-González, an oncologist and senior researcher. He states, "There are at least nine perfectly defined cancer targets affected by ivermectin." 2. Enhances Effects of Chemotherapy and Radiation: Ivermectin not only targets tumor stem cells and promotes cancer cell death but also "enhances the effects of chemo and radiation therapy." This broad impact on the immune system increases the offense against cancers, making it a versatile adjunct to conventional treatments. 3. Inhibits Cancer Cell Cycles: The drug prevents the formation of new cancer cells by inhibiting cancer cell cycles and inducing mitochondrial stress, which leads to the killing of cancer cells. This mechanism is crucial for stopping the proliferation of cancerous cells. 4. Prevents Formation of New Blood Vessels Near Cancer Cells: Ivermectin prevents cancer survival by inhibiting the formation of new blood vessels that transport energy and fuel to cancers. This action starves the cancer cells, hindering their growth and spread. 5. Synergizes with Immunotherapy: Dr. Peter P. Lee, chair of immuno-oncology at the City of Hope, found that ivermectin could synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD1, enhancing the body's immune response to fight cancer. "What we’re learning is that ivermectin is going to be a very powerful drug in the context of really carefully developed immunotherapy combinations," he said. 6. Targets Cancer Stem Cells: Ivermectin preferentially targets cancer stem cells, which are a driver of cancer tumors and relapses. By focusing on these cells, ivermectin attacks the root of cancer's resilience and ability to recur. 7. The Curious Case of Rick Alderson: Mr. Alderson, a retired sawmill worker, “was a dead man walking” and given 6 months to live after his terminal colon cancer had metastasized and spread to his liver, where it had formed 25 distinct tumors. After starting ivermectin, Rick Alderson's carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, which are markers for tumor activity, dropped significantly from 1,498 ng/mL to 13.9 ng/mL in a matter of months. Of the 25 tumors in Mr. Alderson's liver, only three remained after his treatment with ivermectin and chemotherapy, indicating a substantial reduction in tumor burden. Mr. Alderson lived for two more years beyond his initial six-month prognosis, which his wife attributes to the use of ivermectin alongside chemotherapy.

7 Compelling Reasons Why Ivermectin Is a ‘Powerful Drug’ for Fighting Cancer Ivermectin is often recognized–2nd to penicillin–for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. It is safer than Tylenol and brought river blindness to the brink of extinction, but the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Well, it now turns out that ivermectin is not only an effective treatment for COVID-19, but it could also be a “powerful drug” for fighting cancer. Here are 7 reasons why. 1. Multiple Anti-Cancer Effects: Ivermectin impacts at least nine well-defined cancer targets, according to Dr. Alfonso Dueñas-González, an oncologist and senior researcher. He states, "There are at least nine perfectly defined cancer targets affected by ivermectin." 2. Enhances Effects of Chemotherapy and Radiation: Ivermectin not only targets tumor stem cells and promotes cancer cell death but also "enhances the effects of chemo and radiation therapy." This broad impact on the immune system increases the offense against cancers, making it a versatile adjunct to conventional treatments. 3. Inhibits Cancer Cell Cycles: The drug prevents the formation of new cancer cells by inhibiting cancer cell cycles and inducing mitochondrial stress, which leads to the killing of cancer cells. This mechanism is crucial for stopping the proliferation of cancerous cells. 4. Prevents Formation of New Blood Vessels Near Cancer Cells: Ivermectin prevents cancer survival by inhibiting the formation of new blood vessels that transport energy and fuel to cancers. This action starves the cancer cells, hindering their growth and spread. 5. Synergizes with Immunotherapy: Dr. Peter P. Lee, chair of immuno-oncology at the City of Hope, found that ivermectin could synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD1, enhancing the body's immune response to fight cancer. "What we’re learning is that ivermectin is going to be a very powerful drug in the context of really carefully developed immunotherapy combinations," he said. 6. Targets Cancer Stem Cells: Ivermectin preferentially targets cancer stem cells, which are a driver of cancer tumors and relapses. By focusing on these cells, ivermectin attacks the root of cancer's resilience and ability to recur. 7. The Curious Case of Rick Alderson: Mr. Alderson, a retired sawmill worker, “was a dead man walking” and given 6 months to live after his terminal colon cancer had metastasized and spread to his liver, where it had formed 25 distinct tumors. After starting ivermectin, Rick Alderson's carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, which are markers for tumor activity, dropped significantly from 1,498 ng/mL to 13.9 ng/mL in a matter of months. Of the 25 tumors in Mr. Alderson's liver, only three remained after his treatment with ivermectin and chemotherapy, indicating a substantial reduction in tumor burden. Mr. Alderson lived for two more years beyond his initial six-month prognosis, which his wife attributes to the use of ivermectin alongside chemotherapy.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

532,851 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

This is undoubtedly one of the most extraordinary interviews of a former senior US government official on Gaza. This is Chas Freeman, former Assistant Secretary of Defense and former US Ambassador to Saudi Arabia. Key points in the video: - He agrees that many of the victims of Oct 7th were killed by the Israeli army in the form of "undisciplined fire by helicopters with hellfire missiles or by tanks with incendiary rounds directed at buildings". In the case of the victims of the music festival he even says they "were largely killed, it appears, by hellfire missiles and by other undisciplined fire by Israeli forces". To him this "disgrace in military terms" stems from a "lack of discipline and training necessary to respond" but also from the IDF's "Hannibal directive", which "says that rather than get into bargaining over hostage exchange you should just kill the Israeli hostages along with their captors." - He says that with Oct 7th "Hamas had 2 objectives": 1) "Put the Palestinian self-determination issue back on the global agenda", something he says they've "succeeded" in doing since they're is "widespread recognition outside Israel that only self-determination for Palestine in the form of a 2-state solution can provide security to Israel". He says that even in "the US, which has a larger Jewish population than Israel, many Jews have come to realize that this is the case. Younger Jews in particular in the U.S. are very disillusioned with Zionism and don't want to suffer contagion from it in the form of antisemitism, which is actually growing now as a result of Israeli actions". 2) "Give Hamas enormous popularity among Palestinians because they are seen as having stood up, as having been willing to accept death rather than captivity". He refers to Norman Finkelstein's "analogy of slave revolts in the U.S." and particularly the "1831 revolt by Nat Turner, a well-educated very intelligent enslaved African who led a slave revolt in Southern Virginia which had as its objective the murder of every white person they encountered." He says it "raises a moral question: 'Is the violence of the slave-owner morally the same as the violence of the slave trying to end that violence?'. The same moral question arises with Israeli oppression of Palestinians versus Palestinian resistance to oppression." - All in all he concludes that much like the violence against African-Americans that followed slave revolts in the 19th century, the Israeli vengeance against Palestinians "won't be remembered fondly by anyone in the future". In fact he goes as far as saying that "when people think of Israel in the past they thought of it as a refuge for the victims of the Holocaust... now they will think of it as the home of perpetrators of genocide. When they think of Israel, they will think of burned buildings and dead babies. This is an image problem of a fundamental nature and from the point of view of Israel it strips Israel of its protection by charges of antisemitism against anyone who is critical of Israel because to be critical of people who are carrying out genocide cannot be antisemitism, it cannot be considered immoral. Antisemitism is a despicable attitude but to oppose genocide by Israel is not."

This is undoubtedly one of the most extraordinary interviews of a former senior US government official on Gaza. This is Chas Freeman, former Assistant Secretary of Defense and former US Ambassador to Saudi Arabia. Key points in the video: - He agrees that many of the victims of Oct 7th were killed by the Israeli army in the form of "undisciplined fire by helicopters with hellfire missiles or by tanks with incendiary rounds directed at buildings". In the case of the victims of the music festival he even says they "were largely killed, it appears, by hellfire missiles and by other undisciplined fire by Israeli forces". To him this "disgrace in military terms" stems from a "lack of discipline and training necessary to respond" but also from the IDF's "Hannibal directive", which "says that rather than get into bargaining over hostage exchange you should just kill the Israeli hostages along with their captors." - He says that with Oct 7th "Hamas had 2 objectives": 1) "Put the Palestinian self-determination issue back on the global agenda", something he says they've "succeeded" in doing since they're is "widespread recognition outside Israel that only self-determination for Palestine in the form of a 2-state solution can provide security to Israel". He says that even in "the US, which has a larger Jewish population than Israel, many Jews have come to realize that this is the case. Younger Jews in particular in the U.S. are very disillusioned with Zionism and don't want to suffer contagion from it in the form of antisemitism, which is actually growing now as a result of Israeli actions". 2) "Give Hamas enormous popularity among Palestinians because they are seen as having stood up, as having been willing to accept death rather than captivity". He refers to Norman Finkelstein's "analogy of slave revolts in the U.S." and particularly the "1831 revolt by Nat Turner, a well-educated very intelligent enslaved African who led a slave revolt in Southern Virginia which had as its objective the murder of every white person they encountered." He says it "raises a moral question: 'Is the violence of the slave-owner morally the same as the violence of the slave trying to end that violence?'. The same moral question arises with Israeli oppression of Palestinians versus Palestinian resistance to oppression." - All in all he concludes that much like the violence against African-Americans that followed slave revolts in the 19th century, the Israeli vengeance against Palestinians "won't be remembered fondly by anyone in the future". In fact he goes as far as saying that "when people think of Israel in the past they thought of it as a refuge for the victims of the Holocaust... now they will think of it as the home of perpetrators of genocide. When they think of Israel, they will think of burned buildings and dead babies. This is an image problem of a fundamental nature and from the point of view of Israel it strips Israel of its protection by charges of antisemitism against anyone who is critical of Israel because to be critical of people who are carrying out genocide cannot be antisemitism, it cannot be considered immoral. Antisemitism is a despicable attitude but to oppose genocide by Israel is not."

Arnaud Bertrand

2,185,625 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce