Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Abdul El-Sayed on the Second Amendment: "When they promised the right to bear arms, they had muskets. So, yeah, everyone should have equal rights to a musket."
2,423,780 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)
33 Kommentare

Abdul has access to plenty of AK47s through the #MuslimBrotherhood

@mrddmia Abdul fundamentally misunderstands the constitution. The constitution doesnt promise us the right, the constitution promises to prevent the government from infringing on our god given rights.

A Muslim lecturing Americans. 🙄

Buy more guns and more ammo people asap 🇺🇸 these fuckers can't beat us if we are armed

ISIS has AK47 assault rifles folks. His buds!

What part of "the right to bear arms" does he not understand? It means arms, weapons, of any kind to defend yourself, your family, and your country!

@MAGAIncWarRoom I just own the updated version of the musket , it just happens to be semiautomatic.

This is the dumbest of the dumb takes on the Bill of Rights. This is childlike reasoning. Anyone saying this is too stupid to be trusted with anything of value.

That’s an argument Antonin Scalia excoriated and called borderline sanctionable at the Supreme Court. Because it is retarded.

El-Sayed appeals to low IQ voters.🫤

If you live in Michigan and you want to maintain the right to bear arms, don't vote for this guy.

Yes, El Sayed wants everyone but Jihadists disarmed.

I'm conflicted on this one with him. I believe we have a mental health crisis - not a gun control crisis. I'm all for screening for felons and mental health concerns, additional training, and accountability for safe keeping of firearms. However, just making a firearm illegal doesn't make sense when the vast majority of crimes are committed with already illegal firearms.

They had cannon too. They had the most dangerous weapons of the time. We need machine guns now.

Second amendment will save American from Islamo-fascist like this.

The Dems love to talk about existential threats. There is no bigger existential threat to the Country's democracy than this jihadist. First it will be our "muskets," then it will be our churches, and then it will our flags.

Hey @AbdulElSayed and in 1789, Healthcare was catgut and leeches. So everyone's so-called "constitutional right" to healthcare includes only catgut and leeches.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not the 2A is promise that our right to have arms will not be infringed by the government. Government does not give us the right, we already have it.

What word salad is this? Not consistent with any interpretation? This is the law of the land. Low IQ people think it’s about muskets lol

I'll not have some stupid Democrat Muslim lecture me on anything American. . . .

Abdul bringing up tired, ignorant arguments which have long ago been ruled on by the USSC and are obviously flawed to anyone with a bit of critical thinking skills.

Communists have taken over the government. The second amendment has never been more important than it is right now.

They didn't specify muskets related. They said Arms! Amy arms ! Period .

He’s being glib and disingenuous on purpose. Commies want to take your right to bear arms so they can make you easier to control.

That shrimp can come try and take what I have, in person.

@MAGAIncWarRoom But but but his buddies in Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood have access to weapons and we are supposed to give up ours? What a joke.

@mrddmia Ridiculous… Please educate yourself if you are considering voting for this con man. “They had muskets, so they have a right to bear muskets” is a common and pathetically weak argument. Constitutional rights are not frozen to the technology that existed in 1791.

When they wrote the 1st amendment, they wrote it on parchment and delivered via horse. Rights do not change after technological advances. His is the dumbest left wing argument and we’ve heard it over and over from their ilk.

@mrddmia The founders specifically used the term ARMS and not muskets because they were smart men. They knew weaponry would evolve over time. The second amendment was intended to not specify any particular weapon for that very reason. Mini Muhammad is an idiot and a traitor.

I completely agree with this, and I find it absurd that the textualist Scalia didn't agree in the Heller decision.

We didn’t have people in our country when the Bill of Rights was written that weren’t anti-American and anti-Christian. We all had shared values and a shared culture.

When they promised the right to free speech, they had quil and ink. So yeah, everyone should have equal rights to a quill pen

@mrddmia Did they have muslims?
