Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨ABOUT FIRST AMENDMENT AUDITORS: 👮‍♂️Recording on a public sidewalk is not illegal. It's a Constitutional Right. Aggressively approaching someone filming is never a good idea. Just mind your business. 🔥This guy found out the hard way—with a face full of pepper spray.

ScottEnlow's profile picture

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

51,996 subscribers

17,573 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

NEW: Bystander uses pepper spray on a person who was apparently about to get into a fight with someone else at a beach in Miami The person who recorded the video says: "I swear we can never have a - calm beach day. Dude came out of nowhere to pepper spray this guy. Yes he was out of line but some random didn't need to come to the "rescue" it's windy and pepper. spray travels"
0:23

NEW: Bystander uses pepper spray on a person who was apparently about to get into a fight with someone else at a beach in Miami The person who recorded the video says: "I swear we can never have a - calm beach day. Dude came out of nowhere to pepper spray this guy. Yes he was out of line but some random didn't need to come to the "rescue" it's windy and pepper. spray travels"

Unlimited L's

93,146 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

First Amendment auditors are right. Feelings are not law. At a Chick-fil-A, auditors stood on the public sidewalk filming. The manager called police, claiming they were filming “private property,” making guests uncomfortable, and “scanning” vehicles. She wanted them stopped. Police officer did the correct thing: he explained the actual law. The sidewalk is public property, frequented by the public. It is not illegal to record from that location in Tennessee. He pointed out the clear line—if they stepped onto Chick-fil-A property, they could be asked to leave. While they stayed on the public side, they were free to film. He even noted he could walk around with a camera himself from the same spots. That is the entire ballgame. Public spaces belong to the public. What you can see with your eyes from a public sidewalk, you can generally record. This is core First Amendment territory—freedom of the press and the right to gather information in places open to everyone. Courts have repeatedly upheld this. Discomfort, customer complaints, or a business’s preference do not create a new exception. “It makes people feel followed” is not a legal standard. If it were, news crews, citizen journalists, and anyone with a phone could be shut down every time someone felt uneasy. Yes, the auditors could choose a less confrontational style. Standing there with cameras pointed at a drive-thru and parking lot will annoy people. That is obvious. But annoyance is not illegality. The point of these audits is often to test whether officers and businesses actually know the boundary between private property rights and public rights. In this case the officer did. The manager did not. When people start treating “I don’t like it” as equivalent to “you can’t do that,” the First Amendment erodes. Auditors force the conversation back to the actual rules instead of vibes. That is why they keep doing it—and why this one was clean. Public means public. Record away.
2:38

First Amendment auditors are right. Feelings are not law. At a Chick-fil-A, auditors stood on the public sidewalk filming. The manager called police, claiming they were filming “private property,” making guests uncomfortable, and “scanning” vehicles. She wanted them stopped. Police officer did the correct thing: he explained the actual law. The sidewalk is public property, frequented by the public. It is not illegal to record from that location in Tennessee. He pointed out the clear line—if they stepped onto Chick-fil-A property, they could be asked to leave. While they stayed on the public side, they were free to film. He even noted he could walk around with a camera himself from the same spots. That is the entire ballgame. Public spaces belong to the public. What you can see with your eyes from a public sidewalk, you can generally record. This is core First Amendment territory—freedom of the press and the right to gather information in places open to everyone. Courts have repeatedly upheld this. Discomfort, customer complaints, or a business’s preference do not create a new exception. “It makes people feel followed” is not a legal standard. If it were, news crews, citizen journalists, and anyone with a phone could be shut down every time someone felt uneasy. Yes, the auditors could choose a less confrontational style. Standing there with cameras pointed at a drive-thru and parking lot will annoy people. That is obvious. But annoyance is not illegality. The point of these audits is often to test whether officers and businesses actually know the boundary between private property rights and public rights. In this case the officer did. The manager did not. When people start treating “I don’t like it” as equivalent to “you can’t do that,” the First Amendment erodes. Auditors force the conversation back to the actual rules instead of vibes. That is why they keep doing it—and why this one was clean. Public means public. Record away.

DocumentingLibs

69,376 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Filming ICE in public is protected speech. If someone with a badge loses their temper, your constitutional rights don’t disappear. explains: When an agent gets inches from your face and screams “18 U.S.C. 111” while threatening cuffs just to make you stop recording — that’s not “law and order.” That’s First Amendment retaliation. FIGHT ICE WITH PAXIS so people know their rights:
0:54

Filming ICE in public is protected speech. If someone with a badge loses their temper, your constitutional rights don’t disappear. explains: When an agent gets inches from your face and screams “18 U.S.C. 111” while threatening cuffs just to make you stop recording — that’s not “law and order.” That’s First Amendment retaliation. FIGHT ICE WITH PAXIS so people know their rights:

Joe Walsh

83,408 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Courts have repeatedly and explicitly upheld the right to film anyone in public places anywhere in the United States under the First Amendment. This woman "in the film industry" is confusing getting a release for private filming for private profit with the constitutional right of recording in public. Bonus: She's demonstrating the Streisand Effect.
1:26

Courts have repeatedly and explicitly upheld the right to film anyone in public places anywhere in the United States under the First Amendment. This woman "in the film industry" is confusing getting a release for private filming for private profit with the constitutional right of recording in public. Bonus: She's demonstrating the Streisand Effect.

Sebastian™

19,858 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨Must See Video - This is CRAZY!💪First Amendment Protection Agency 💪 💪John Medaglia III (First Amendment Protection Agency) was unjustly arrested in Tupelo, MS in January 2026 while standing on a public sidewalk filming the exterior of Dabbs Cannabis Dispensary. 👮‍♂️Tupelo police officer Douglas Dean arrested him as he stood on public property, charged him with criminal loitering (not even a law) and disorderly conduct — under a loitering bill that never even passed. 💪Prosecutors have now dropped all charges. 💪The video below with the good news just dropped. 💪Congratulations to Johnny — justice prevailed. 💪The right to record in public is not a crime. ❓Who should Medaglia sue? 1) The City of Tupelo 2) The officer personally 3) Dabb's Cannabis Dispensary ❓Is this police enforcing the law — or just acting as a business’s private muscle after a complaint? Video credit: FAPA Find FAPA on Rumble, Patreon and Locals.
22:44

🚨Must See Video - This is CRAZY!💪First Amendment Protection Agency 💪 💪John Medaglia III (First Amendment Protection Agency) was unjustly arrested in Tupelo, MS in January 2026 while standing on a public sidewalk filming the exterior of Dabbs Cannabis Dispensary. 👮‍♂️Tupelo police officer Douglas Dean arrested him as he stood on public property, charged him with criminal loitering (not even a law) and disorderly conduct — under a loitering bill that never even passed. 💪Prosecutors have now dropped all charges. 💪The video below with the good news just dropped. 💪Congratulations to Johnny — justice prevailed. 💪The right to record in public is not a crime. ❓Who should Medaglia sue? 1) The City of Tupelo 2) The officer personally 3) Dabb's Cannabis Dispensary ❓Is this police enforcing the law — or just acting as a business’s private muscle after a complaint? Video credit: FAPA Find FAPA on Rumble, Patreon and Locals.

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

20,957 просмотров • 27 дней назад

🚨If this happened to you on a Texas sidewalk, would you still call it “just doing their job”? 🎥This video shows a Harris County Precinct 6 deputy constable and a partner confronting an unknown First Amendment auditor filming a chemical plant from a public sidewalk in Texas. Constables arrived on a call, called it a Homeland Security issue, demanded ID, then handcuffed the auditor and put him in a patrol car for absolutely no reason. Filming from a public sidewalk is legal whether you are filming a chemical plant or a flock of seagulls. This is a common pattern at Harris County chemical plants: security calls, officers treat it as suspicious, and detain the person who won’t identify. This deputy constable detained, forcefully identified, then released the auditor. ❓How many more people have to get handcuffed on a public sidewalk before Harris County admits this is illegal?
4:49

🚨If this happened to you on a Texas sidewalk, would you still call it “just doing their job”? 🎥This video shows a Harris County Precinct 6 deputy constable and a partner confronting an unknown First Amendment auditor filming a chemical plant from a public sidewalk in Texas. Constables arrived on a call, called it a Homeland Security issue, demanded ID, then handcuffed the auditor and put him in a patrol car for absolutely no reason. Filming from a public sidewalk is legal whether you are filming a chemical plant or a flock of seagulls. This is a common pattern at Harris County chemical plants: security calls, officers treat it as suspicious, and detain the person who won’t identify. This deputy constable detained, forcefully identified, then released the auditor. ❓How many more people have to get handcuffed on a public sidewalk before Harris County admits this is illegal?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

116,515 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚔Cedar Rapids. Public street. A parked squad car. A camera. A First Amendment auditor is filming a police vehicle from the sidewalk — public property, public view, no touching, no blocking, no crime. Then Investigator Matt Denlinger, badge 830, steps into the frame. Not the marked-unit traffic stop version of the job. The cold-case guy with no visible police ID. And the first move is the oldest line in these videos: 🤨I need to see your ID. The auditor doesn’t bite. Filming a public car on a public street isn’t a crime. Iowa doesn’t have a blanket stop-and-identify law for a consensual encounter. You can ask. They can walk. Policy is not statute. Denlinger wants a name. The camera wants a badge number. That’s the whole dance. No cuffs. No ticket. No Gazette headline. Just a detective claiming a camera is reasonable suspicion. Here’s the rule they keep teaching the hard way: the First Amendment doesn’t care how weird it looks to stand on a sidewalk and film a government car. Suspicious is not the same as illegal. A request is not a command. And “because I said so” is not probable cause. Watch the clip. Count how many times the officer asks for ID. Then count the crimes. ❓What would you have told Denlinger? ❓Is filming a police car reasonable suspicion of a crime?
2:45

🚔Cedar Rapids. Public street. A parked squad car. A camera. A First Amendment auditor is filming a police vehicle from the sidewalk — public property, public view, no touching, no blocking, no crime. Then Investigator Matt Denlinger, badge 830, steps into the frame. Not the marked-unit traffic stop version of the job. The cold-case guy with no visible police ID. And the first move is the oldest line in these videos: 🤨I need to see your ID. The auditor doesn’t bite. Filming a public car on a public street isn’t a crime. Iowa doesn’t have a blanket stop-and-identify law for a consensual encounter. You can ask. They can walk. Policy is not statute. Denlinger wants a name. The camera wants a badge number. That’s the whole dance. No cuffs. No ticket. No Gazette headline. Just a detective claiming a camera is reasonable suspicion. Here’s the rule they keep teaching the hard way: the First Amendment doesn’t care how weird it looks to stand on a sidewalk and film a government car. Suspicious is not the same as illegal. A request is not a command. And “because I said so” is not probable cause. Watch the clip. Count how many times the officer asks for ID. Then count the crimes. ❓What would you have told Denlinger? ❓Is filming a police car reasonable suspicion of a crime?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

49,730 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Lyman: Running someone over with a car is a crime. That’s what Renee Good did. She accelerated. Sellers: Should they still be alive? Lyman: Of course, I wish they did not put themselves in this position. Running someone over with your car is not a first amendment right.
2:08

Lyman: Running someone over with a car is a crime. That’s what Renee Good did. She accelerated. Sellers: Should they still be alive? Lyman: Of course, I wish they did not put themselves in this position. Running someone over with your car is not a first amendment right.

Acyn

85,903 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

First Amendment “auditor” filming inside USPS. Karen loses her mind, starts smashing his camera like it owes her money. Result? Face full of pepper spray and instant regret. Word to the wise: This is EXACTLY the reaction these clowns bait for. Don’t engage.
0:27

First Amendment “auditor” filming inside USPS. Karen loses her mind, starts smashing his camera like it owes her money. Result? Face full of pepper spray and instant regret. Word to the wise: This is EXACTLY the reaction these clowns bait for. Don’t engage.

Kim "Katie" USA

155,657 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

👮‍♀️Officer Calls Three Units Over Sidewalk Filming👮‍♀️ She thinks recording in public is suspicious and standing up for 4th Amendment rights is being uncooperative. She also thinks illegal detainment with absolutely no crime is okay. What's your verdict? Is the cameraman a troublemaker? or Is she pushing it too far?
5:17

👮‍♀️Officer Calls Three Units Over Sidewalk Filming👮‍♀️ She thinks recording in public is suspicious and standing up for 4th Amendment rights is being uncooperative. She also thinks illegal detainment with absolutely no crime is okay. What's your verdict? Is the cameraman a troublemaker? or Is she pushing it too far?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

45,459 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

👮‍♂️👮‍♂️Once Again Feelings Enforcement Police Show Up To Identify A Citizen Recording On A Public Sidewalk! The Homeland Security memo from 2010 says it's not illegal or suspicious to record exteriors of federal facilities. Therefore it cannot be deemed a crime. When police run your ID through their databases it is forever recorded. Your name is now documented. ❓Would you care if your name and information was entered into a "terrorist watch" database? I would.
9:46

👮‍♂️👮‍♂️Once Again Feelings Enforcement Police Show Up To Identify A Citizen Recording On A Public Sidewalk! The Homeland Security memo from 2010 says it's not illegal or suspicious to record exteriors of federal facilities. Therefore it cannot be deemed a crime. When police run your ID through their databases it is forever recorded. Your name is now documented. ❓Would you care if your name and information was entered into a "terrorist watch" database? I would.

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

36,492 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

INTERESTING: This man filming a store front on a public sidewalk gets confronted by the owner. The owner then pushes the camera and the man sprays him with pepper spray! The officer responds and issues citation to the store owner. Do you think that was the right move?
1:58

INTERESTING: This man filming a store front on a public sidewalk gets confronted by the owner. The owner then pushes the camera and the man sprays him with pepper spray! The officer responds and issues citation to the store owner. Do you think that was the right move?

AmericanPapaBear™

1,790,613 просмотров • 1 год назад

Hilarious cop helps defend guy recording. This man was recording a business from the sidewalk, and a woman and man were giving him a hard time. A nearby cop used his intercom to make them stop. The guy claiming to be a lawyer had to get a lesson from the cop, who crossed the street to talk to him. Is it annoying that people record? Yes, it can be. But it’s not illegal—it’s protected under the 1st Amendment.
2:01

Hilarious cop helps defend guy recording. This man was recording a business from the sidewalk, and a woman and man were giving him a hard time. A nearby cop used his intercom to make them stop. The guy claiming to be a lawyer had to get a lesson from the cop, who crossed the street to talk to him. Is it annoying that people record? Yes, it can be. But it’s not illegal—it’s protected under the 1st Amendment.

Suzee Q

56,287 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

This officer pulled this guy over for speeding and now tried to pepper spray him because he said the guy was not cooperating with him.This officer tried to spray him,but was out of pepper spray because he has a history of spraying people with it all the time for no good reason!
1:19

This officer pulled this guy over for speeding and now tried to pepper spray him because he said the guy was not cooperating with him.This officer tried to spray him,but was out of pepper spray because he has a history of spraying people with it all the time for no good reason!

Suzie rizzio

809,798 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Jacksonville cops just stopped a man from giving away FREE BIBLES on a public street. Not selling. Not screaming. Not blocking the road. Just handing people a book. This is what “public safety” looks like now. They’ll let open-air drug markets run for years. They’ll ignore smash-and-grabs. But a guy with a stack of Bibles? That’s the emergency. If this is allowed to stand, the First Amendment is just a suggestion in Florida. I get that you may not want some guy handing you a Bible, but should this really be illegal or prohibited? Why? Would any other religious book be allowed to be handed out?
0:55

Jacksonville cops just stopped a man from giving away FREE BIBLES on a public street. Not selling. Not screaming. Not blocking the road. Just handing people a book. This is what “public safety” looks like now. They’ll let open-air drug markets run for years. They’ll ignore smash-and-grabs. But a guy with a stack of Bibles? That’s the emergency. If this is allowed to stand, the First Amendment is just a suggestion in Florida. I get that you may not want some guy handing you a Bible, but should this really be illegal or prohibited? Why? Would any other religious book be allowed to be handed out?

DocumentingLibs

189,008 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Messing with the guy who just got out of the gym, not a good idea
0:28

Messing with the guy who just got out of the gym, not a good idea

K.O. Fights

808,693 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨When a Sheriff Tells a Flat Out Lie on Camera. On June 4, 2020, First Amendment auditor George Metz II (Rogue Nation) and a colleague filmed government buildings in Dothan, Ala., from public sidewalks, including the exterior of a police building. Houston County Sheriff Donald Valenza approached, told Metz had broken the law by filming their building, detained him, demanded ID, and said he was conducting an investigation. Sheriff Valenza said, "You're doing something illegal right now by filming government buildings." (Bold faced lie.) Metz said there was no reasonable suspicion for the stop. In May 2022 Metz sued Valenza in federal court for Fourth Amendment illegal seizure and First Amendment retaliation. A magistrate recommended denying Valenza qualified immunity at the motion-to-dismiss stage, finding Metz had plausibly alleged a clearly established rights violation based on the complaint and video. The district judge adopted that and let the case proceed. The case did not go to a public merits ruling. On Oct. 10, 2024, it was dismissed with prejudice “on the terms set out and agreed to by the parties”—a settlement dismissal. Filming public buildings from a public sidewalk is generally protected; the dispute was whether the detention and ID demand were lawful. ❓Are First Amendment auditors journalists, agitators, or both? ❓What does the video actually show Sheriff Valenza doing? ❓Should a sheriff and his gang of deputies be able to detain you on a public sidewalk just for filming a police building?
13:08

🚨When a Sheriff Tells a Flat Out Lie on Camera. On June 4, 2020, First Amendment auditor George Metz II (Rogue Nation) and a colleague filmed government buildings in Dothan, Ala., from public sidewalks, including the exterior of a police building. Houston County Sheriff Donald Valenza approached, told Metz had broken the law by filming their building, detained him, demanded ID, and said he was conducting an investigation. Sheriff Valenza said, "You're doing something illegal right now by filming government buildings." (Bold faced lie.) Metz said there was no reasonable suspicion for the stop. In May 2022 Metz sued Valenza in federal court for Fourth Amendment illegal seizure and First Amendment retaliation. A magistrate recommended denying Valenza qualified immunity at the motion-to-dismiss stage, finding Metz had plausibly alleged a clearly established rights violation based on the complaint and video. The district judge adopted that and let the case proceed. The case did not go to a public merits ruling. On Oct. 10, 2024, it was dismissed with prejudice “on the terms set out and agreed to by the parties”—a settlement dismissal. Filming public buildings from a public sidewalk is generally protected; the dispute was whether the detention and ID demand were lawful. ❓Are First Amendment auditors journalists, agitators, or both? ❓What does the video actually show Sheriff Valenza doing? ❓Should a sheriff and his gang of deputies be able to detain you on a public sidewalk just for filming a police building?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

61,511 просмотров • 19 дней назад

.travis kalanick on finding your business soulmate: "I like to say you go out on a date with an idea. Was it a good date? Did it go well? How did you and the idea get along? Who you are is going to be a big part of which idea works for you. [I call this] finding your sport or your business soulmate. If you're in touch with who you are then when the right idea comes your way you just know."
0:42

.travis kalanick on finding your business soulmate: "I like to say you go out on a date with an idea. Was it a good date? Did it go well? How did you and the idea get along? Who you are is going to be a big part of which idea works for you. [I call this] finding your sport or your business soulmate. If you're in touch with who you are then when the right idea comes your way you just know."

David Senra

18,236 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Kasparov: It's the first time, never thought it would happen in America. The government official threatened the public broadcaster with the confiscation of their license. The whole idea of debating what Jimmy Kimmel said is wrong because it's a First Amendment. 1/
0:25

Kasparov: It's the first time, never thought it would happen in America. The government official threatened the public broadcaster with the confiscation of their license. The whole idea of debating what Jimmy Kimmel said is wrong because it's a First Amendment. 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

213,000 просмотров • 1 год назад