Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Absolutely ridiculous. Not only is it wrong, it's also not a clear and obvious error. Where was he supposed to put his foot down? The VAR is re-refereeing the game. There is no point sending a ref to the monitor, when the result is already given.

kimmoFC's profile picture

🇳🇴 kimmoFC

44,226 subscribers

928,495 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsComedySports
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

"Well he changed it in game, which is the frustrating thing which shows it's not clear and obvious." John McGinn feels tonight's result is tough to take. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 #EURO2024
2:20

"Well he changed it in game, which is the frustrating thing which shows it's not clear and obvious." John McGinn feels tonight's result is tough to take. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 #EURO2024

Premier Sports

275,485 views • 2 years ago

“There is no big 3. When the big 3 was supposed to engage, only 2 of them decided to engage…After the 2, one reigned supreme…There is a clear #1 and his name is Kendrick Lamar.”
0:32

“There is no big 3. When the big 3 was supposed to engage, only 2 of them decided to engage…After the 2, one reigned supreme…There is a clear #1 and his name is Kendrick Lamar.”

27x Grammy winner kendrick lamar 🎲🥋

13,363 views • 7 months ago

What's the point of having a show where Webb is only there to defend EVERY refs decision, no matter how horrible it is. This is not transparacy. This is bias, and worthless. Listen to the lengths he goes to protect Oliver and VAR. Man City coming up....
1:22

What's the point of having a show where Webb is only there to defend EVERY refs decision, no matter how horrible it is. This is not transparacy. This is bias, and worthless. Listen to the lengths he goes to protect Oliver and VAR. Man City coming up....

🇳🇴 kimmoFC

2,290,267 views • 1 year ago

Here is Arbuckle the OU OC after the game . Obviously deceptive and avoiding the question. His WR did not " quick motion over there " he walked ...and it appears obvious that they coached their WR to point at the official before the play to make it all legal . And the ref saw nothing deceptive or wrong with that ??? #WarEagle
0:53

Here is Arbuckle the OU OC after the game . Obviously deceptive and avoiding the question. His WR did not " quick motion over there " he walked ...and it appears obvious that they coached their WR to point at the official before the play to make it all legal . And the ref saw nothing deceptive or wrong with that ??? #WarEagle

WarEagleTV.com

153,538 views • 11 months ago

If someone can actually explain to me what the foul actually is? Because I don’t see it. Is it even a foul? Was it a clear & obvious error by the ref? Cheating Beaton.
0:25

If someone can actually explain to me what the foul actually is? Because I don’t see it. Is it even a foul? Was it a clear & obvious error by the ref? Cheating Beaton.

Henke_hoops

218,302 views • 7 months ago

Lots of folks wondering why the two plays to Oneil Cruz in the Pittsburgh Pirates at New York Mets game were recorded as hits. Here is the first one, and you can see he misjudges this line drive, and he comes in and then it sails over his head. MIsjudgement is NOT an error, so this correctly went down as a triple. Is it a ball that he needs to catch? Yes. Is it an error? No. An error is a physical misplay, and there is not a physicial misplay here. #LetsGoBucs #LGM
1:06

Lots of folks wondering why the two plays to Oneil Cruz in the Pittsburgh Pirates at New York Mets game were recorded as hits. Here is the first one, and you can see he misjudges this line drive, and he comes in and then it sails over his head. MIsjudgement is NOT an error, so this correctly went down as a triple. Is it a ball that he needs to catch? Yes. Is it an error? No. An error is a physical misplay, and there is not a physicial misplay here. #LetsGoBucs #LGM

MLB Scoring Changes

118,748 views • 5 months ago

🗣️ "This is an error for us. The VAR is also disappointed. A type of mistake we need to eradicate." SFA head of refereeing Willie Collum on why it was wrong that Rangers' Emmanuel Fernandez was not penalised for handball against Livingston. Link to show ⤵️
2:50

🗣️ "This is an error for us. The VAR is also disappointed. A type of mistake we need to eradicate." SFA head of refereeing Willie Collum on why it was wrong that Rangers' Emmanuel Fernandez was not penalised for handball against Livingston. Link to show ⤵️

Sky Sports Scotland

435,149 views • 8 months ago

There is something to this. Just keep watching, it's not long. There was already something to it before the end. The end is just a kicker.
0:55

There is something to this. Just keep watching, it's not long. There was already something to it before the end. The end is just a kicker.

𝐁𝐢𝐟𝐟

55,042 views • 2 months ago

Charlamagne says there’s no Big 3 anymore: “There is no big 3. When the big 3 was supposed to engage, only 2 of them decided to engage…After the 2, one reigned supreme…There is a clear #1 and his name is Kendrick Lamar.”
1:15

Charlamagne says there’s no Big 3 anymore: “There is no big 3. When the big 3 was supposed to engage, only 2 of them decided to engage…After the 2, one reigned supreme…There is a clear #1 and his name is Kendrick Lamar.”

Joey

716,928 views • 7 months ago

My take: the ball hitting a hand is not always a handball offence. You have to either 1.) deliberately touch the ball with your hand, or 2.) ball hits your hand/arm when it's made your body unnaturally bigger. This isn't deliberate, and if the ball hits his hand - which is on his forehead in the middle of a normal footballing challenge - he hasn't made his body unnaturally bigger. Because the ball would have hit his head anyway, so his hand on his head does not make his body unnaturally bigger. Furthermore, VAR can only recommend an on-field review for a clear and obvious error. There is only one camera angle available, which does not show that the referee has missed a clear and obvious error. We can't see clearly where the ball hits. This is categorically not what VAR was brought in for, and it all needs ripped up in the summer. This is a really poor look for Scottish football, as you can see from the international condemnation online since the game. You really have to feel for Hearts. Unless you're a Celtic fan of course, that must have been class. But if you're not a Celtic fan. Deary me. Could be a generation defining decision, never mind season defining!
0:25

My take: the ball hitting a hand is not always a handball offence. You have to either 1.) deliberately touch the ball with your hand, or 2.) ball hits your hand/arm when it's made your body unnaturally bigger. This isn't deliberate, and if the ball hits his hand - which is on his forehead in the middle of a normal footballing challenge - he hasn't made his body unnaturally bigger. Because the ball would have hit his head anyway, so his hand on his head does not make his body unnaturally bigger. Furthermore, VAR can only recommend an on-field review for a clear and obvious error. There is only one camera angle available, which does not show that the referee has missed a clear and obvious error. We can't see clearly where the ball hits. This is categorically not what VAR was brought in for, and it all needs ripped up in the summer. This is a really poor look for Scottish football, as you can see from the international condemnation online since the game. You really have to feel for Hearts. Unless you're a Celtic fan of course, that must have been class. But if you're not a Celtic fan. Deary me. Could be a generation defining decision, never mind season defining!

Scotland’s Coefficient

420,683 views • 3 months ago

Also, incidents like this, where the Waymo is obstructing the road are not counted. The point is, it is not fair to just look at the NHTSA data and draw a conclusion from it.
0:28

Also, incidents like this, where the Waymo is obstructing the road are not counted. The point is, it is not fair to just look at the NHTSA data and draw a conclusion from it.

Robin

24,477 views • 6 months ago

The video on the left were all called fouls. The video on the right was not Inconsistent refereeing is worse than bad refereeing. A foul is a foul is a foul Pretty shameless to swallow it with the game on the line there. Gotta feel for this Pistons team
0:28

The video on the left were all called fouls. The video on the right was not Inconsistent refereeing is worse than bad refereeing. A foul is a foul is a foul Pretty shameless to swallow it with the game on the line there. Gotta feel for this Pistons team

Sean Barnard

230,081 views • 1 year ago

Abby Phillip: “Here's the main issue. Is it legal… if there are survivors clinging to whatever, is it legal to then strike them again?” Batya Ungar-Sargon: “The question is not actually that… No, Abby. Is the whole thing hangs on whether the boat is still a military target or not?” “Because if it was a military target, there were people on it when they hit it the first time.” Abby Phillip: “The issue when it comes to the legality of the second strike, not the first one strike… It's what happens to survivors.” Batya Ungar-Sargon: “No, it's not, Abby. That's wrong... The question is not the existence of the survivors. It's whether the boat is still a legitimate military target.”
1:04

Abby Phillip: “Here's the main issue. Is it legal… if there are survivors clinging to whatever, is it legal to then strike them again?” Batya Ungar-Sargon: “The question is not actually that… No, Abby. Is the whole thing hangs on whether the boat is still a military target or not?” “Because if it was a military target, there were people on it when they hit it the first time.” Abby Phillip: “The issue when it comes to the legality of the second strike, not the first one strike… It's what happens to survivors.” Batya Ungar-Sargon: “No, it's not, Abby. That's wrong... The question is not the existence of the survivors. It's whether the boat is still a legitimate military target.”

RedWave Press

115,833 views • 8 months ago

The message Elon Musk is sending to the world is clear: He puts his money where his mouth is. He has created a new model of absolute dedication to the principles of free speech in Brazil. It does not matter what you’re saying, you have the right to say it.
1:01

The message Elon Musk is sending to the world is clear: He puts his money where his mouth is. He has created a new model of absolute dedication to the principles of free speech in Brazil. It does not matter what you’re saying, you have the right to say it.

Rep. María Elvira Salazar

76,015 views • 2 years ago

"What's he supposed to do? What is he supposed to do there?" "I really don't know. I think it's ridiculous." "It is ridiculous. It's football. It's absurd." Sean McDonough and Greg McElroy after a roughing the passer penalty negates a turnover for Notre Dame against Navy.
1:46

"What's he supposed to do? What is he supposed to do there?" "I really don't know. I think it's ridiculous." "It is ridiculous. It's football. It's absurd." Sean McDonough and Greg McElroy after a roughing the passer penalty negates a turnover for Notre Dame against Navy.

Awful Announcing

339,122 views • 1 year ago

Shoulder the burden is at the point where it is causing brain rot similar to old dead hard If you play like it's there and it's not, you look stupid. If you play like it's not there and it is, you lose on the spot
0:51

Shoulder the burden is at the point where it is causing brain rot similar to old dead hard If you play like it's there and it's not, you look stupid. If you play like it's not there and it is, you lose on the spot

prion_tv

15,599 views • 3 months ago

That penalty is a disgrace I hate United, but we need to put rivalry aside and fight this incompetent organization. 1. It's a coming together 2. VAR should only interfere when the ref has done an obvious mistake. This is highly subjective.
0:47

That penalty is a disgrace I hate United, but we need to put rivalry aside and fight this incompetent organization. 1. It's a coming together 2. VAR should only interfere when the ref has done an obvious mistake. This is highly subjective.

🇳🇴 kimmoFC

1,219,466 views • 1 year ago

When is a penalty not a penalty? 🤔 The Premier League's key match incident panel voted that Kai Havertz should have been awarded a penalty against Everton - but VAR was right not to intervene as it was not 'clear and obvious'. #SkySportsFC
2:56

When is a penalty not a penalty? 🤔 The Premier League's key match incident panel voted that Kai Havertz should have been awarded a penalty against Everton - but VAR was right not to intervene as it was not 'clear and obvious'. #SkySportsFC

Sky Sports News

138,929 views • 5 months ago