Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

ActBlue Exposed: Texas Donors Shocked by Unauthorized Donations, AG's Office Investigating "I’m not rich. I don’t give that kind of money,” says Janice Bosco of Horseshoe Bay, TX, after discovering that ActBlue (ActBlue) recorded 648 donations totaling around $16,000 in her name. Despite her disbelief, she hesitates to dispute...

JamesOKeefeIII's profile picture

James O'Keefe

3,580,863 subscribers

1,334,489 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

FinansHaberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

Wall Street Apes profil fotoğrafı
Wall Street Apes2 yıl önce

@actblue This is potentially the largest money laundering operation by a political party in history that’s been exposed and all the mainstream media literally couldn’t care less. They’re all in on it, everybody is on the same team.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸2 yıl önce

@actblue This should result in serious jail time for ActBlue, if we had a real DOJ

Wise Squirrel profil fotoğrafı
Wise Squirrel2 yıl önce

@actblue This is the biggest political money laundering scheme in our nations history and the Mainstream Media is silent. 🦗 Why is that? Where are the real journalists at @MSNBC , @ABC , @NBCNews , @CNN and @FoxNews ?

Old School Eddie profil fotoğrafı
Old School Eddie2 yıl önce

@actblue Face it ActBlue was nothing but a money laundering operation, we need to find out where that money came from and if it involved foreign actors. This was a huge operation!

Klay Thompson profil fotoğrafı
Klay Thompson2 yıl önce

@actblue The level of corruption right now is completely out of control.

ATXRedpill profil fotoğrafı
ATXRedpill2 yıl önce

@actblue When is ACT BLUE going to be investigated?

The Booth Project profil fotoğrafı
The Booth Project2 yıl önce

@actblue Individuals should start suing. Probably make a lot of cash for them to settle out, or they'd have to suffer discovery.

Jim Klein profil fotoğrafı
Jim Klein2 yıl önce

@actblue C’mon Governor Abbott…time for the AG to file charges! #ActBlue @KamalaHQ @harris_wins #MAGA #StopTheSteal

James R. profil fotoğrafı
James R.2 yıl önce

@actblue You can't be a Democrat unless you cheat

Craig O, Gibbs profil fotoğrafı
Craig O, Gibbs2 yıl önce

@actblue Tell the citizens to request full refunds and file ID theft complaints, then may drop a class action suit on the Blue.

Benzer Videolar

Texas Woman Denies Thousands of ActBlue Donations: "There's No Way I Made All Those;" TX Sheriff's Office RESPONDS JUST IN ON ACT BLUE MONEY LAUNDERING: “No, there's no way I had made all those,” says Barbara Staples of Spring, Texas, shocked to learn ActBlue (ActBlue) listed her as making 1,600 donations totaling $13,000, including 53 transactions in a single day. Gerda Henderson faced similar issues, with $33,000 in unauthorized donations over 484 days. Despite only approving a few dollars, she had to close her credit card due to fraudulent charges, stating that she “Stopped it all” and “Canceled it all out.” Unlike most other fundraising platforms, ActBlue does not require a CVV number on transactions. When asked if she approved all of the transactions, she replied “No.” OMG contacted the Montgomery County Sheriff's Office (MCTXSheriff) for comment on whether they were conducting a criminal investigation. In response, they issued a statement saying, "It appears that both donors made voluntary contributions through ActBlue. One donor was reimbursed after contesting some of the charges, while the other cannot recall whether all or only some of the donations were authorized." Current Revolt (Tony Ortiz (Current Revolt)) reveals the Texas Office of Attorney General’s ActBlue investigation has been stalled since January by First Assistant Brent Webster, stating “Attorney General Ken Paxton isn’t fully aware of the investigation, as Webster has been withholding information and updates,” adding “We’ve been told Webster is withholding this information from AG Paxton to seek favor with the firm Singer works for as a sort of insurance policy for his next job when he leaves the Texas OAG.” The FEC Election Watch Senator Marco Rubio: Archived Marco Rubio Attorney General Ken Paxton Texas Attorney General
6:30

Texas Woman Denies Thousands of ActBlue Donations: "There's No Way I Made All Those;" TX Sheriff's Office RESPONDS JUST IN ON ACT BLUE MONEY LAUNDERING: “No, there's no way I had made all those,” says Barbara Staples of Spring, Texas, shocked to learn ActBlue (ActBlue) listed her as making 1,600 donations totaling $13,000, including 53 transactions in a single day. Gerda Henderson faced similar issues, with $33,000 in unauthorized donations over 484 days. Despite only approving a few dollars, she had to close her credit card due to fraudulent charges, stating that she “Stopped it all” and “Canceled it all out.” Unlike most other fundraising platforms, ActBlue does not require a CVV number on transactions. When asked if she approved all of the transactions, she replied “No.” OMG contacted the Montgomery County Sheriff's Office (MCTXSheriff) for comment on whether they were conducting a criminal investigation. In response, they issued a statement saying, "It appears that both donors made voluntary contributions through ActBlue. One donor was reimbursed after contesting some of the charges, while the other cannot recall whether all or only some of the donations were authorized." Current Revolt (Tony Ortiz (Current Revolt)) reveals the Texas Office of Attorney General’s ActBlue investigation has been stalled since January by First Assistant Brent Webster, stating “Attorney General Ken Paxton isn’t fully aware of the investigation, as Webster has been withholding information and updates,” adding “We’ve been told Webster is withholding this information from AG Paxton to seek favor with the firm Singer works for as a sort of insurance policy for his next job when he leaves the Texas OAG.” The FEC Election Watch Senator Marco Rubio: Archived Marco Rubio Attorney General Ken Paxton Texas Attorney General

James O'Keefe

1,547,259 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

BREAKING: Donors Across the U.S. Deny Massive ActBlue Donations Amid Attorney General Investigations "He did not do $300,000 worth of anything in three years," exclaims Pam Fridrich, wife to Heinz Fridrich, when presented with FEC data by an O’Keefe Media Group Citizen Journalist in Fernandina Beach, Florida, claiming the Fridrichs donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to ActBlue. When asked if they had made the contributions, Pam responds, "Not to my knowledge." The Fridrich family, overwhelmed by the allegations, remains perplexed by how such large sums could be attributed to them. Across the country, in Las Vegas, Nevada, Elaina Bulow, a devout Democrat, is reportedly linked to around 830 donations totaling roughly $111,000. Bulow, who regularly monitors her bank statements, was outraged when presented with the FEC data, stating bluntly, "What’s on that website is a lot of bullsh*t." Despite being a frequent donor, Bulow denies contributing anything close to the reported amount, saying, "Not that much... Not $111,000." Similarly, Salt Lake City, Utah, resident Marilyn Shearer found her name tied to nearly 3,600 transactions totaling over $133,000. Shearer admits to donating regularly, stating, “I donate quite a bit, probably every day, which is frustrating.” Despite her frequency in donating, she is stunned by the transactions attributed to her name. When questioned about the possibility of donating upwards of $100,000, Shearer shook her head no in disbelief. The ActBlue donation legitimacy issue is escalating, with attorney generals from Texas, Wyoming, Missouri, Virginia, and two anonymous states launching investigations into the organization's questionable fundraising practices. ActBlue The FEC Election Watch @AGAshleyMoody Ashley Moody NV Attorney General Office of the Utah Attorney General
9:09

BREAKING: Donors Across the U.S. Deny Massive ActBlue Donations Amid Attorney General Investigations "He did not do $300,000 worth of anything in three years," exclaims Pam Fridrich, wife to Heinz Fridrich, when presented with FEC data by an O’Keefe Media Group Citizen Journalist in Fernandina Beach, Florida, claiming the Fridrichs donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to ActBlue. When asked if they had made the contributions, Pam responds, "Not to my knowledge." The Fridrich family, overwhelmed by the allegations, remains perplexed by how such large sums could be attributed to them. Across the country, in Las Vegas, Nevada, Elaina Bulow, a devout Democrat, is reportedly linked to around 830 donations totaling roughly $111,000. Bulow, who regularly monitors her bank statements, was outraged when presented with the FEC data, stating bluntly, "What’s on that website is a lot of bullsh*t." Despite being a frequent donor, Bulow denies contributing anything close to the reported amount, saying, "Not that much... Not $111,000." Similarly, Salt Lake City, Utah, resident Marilyn Shearer found her name tied to nearly 3,600 transactions totaling over $133,000. Shearer admits to donating regularly, stating, “I donate quite a bit, probably every day, which is frustrating.” Despite her frequency in donating, she is stunned by the transactions attributed to her name. When questioned about the possibility of donating upwards of $100,000, Shearer shook her head no in disbelief. The ActBlue donation legitimacy issue is escalating, with attorney generals from Texas, Wyoming, Missouri, Virginia, and two anonymous states launching investigations into the organization's questionable fundraising practices. ActBlue The FEC Election Watch @AGAshleyMoody Ashley Moody NV Attorney General Office of the Utah Attorney General

James O'Keefe

877,914 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

HOLEE SHIZZLES‼️ 🚨Arizona Senator Uncovers Alleged ACTBLUE 'Magic Mortgage' Money Laundering Scheme" — "Billions in Dark Money” Set up by OBAMA to Spread Cash Around the United States - Arizona State Senator Mark Finchem discusses a "Magic Mortgage" money laundering scheme allegedly tied to ActBlue, a major Democratic fundraising platform. - The scheme involves purchasing properties for $200,000 and then creating $200 million mortgages, with funds laundered through wire transfers via title companies. - Finchem claims these transactions lack traditional lenders and involve ActBlue corporate officers, with evidence found across the nation. - The investigation, led by Finchem and whistleblower Shawn Taylor, suggests this could be one of the largest financial crimes in U.S. history, involving BILLIONS in illicit funds. - Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's ongoing investigation into ActBlue, initiated in December 2023, has already uncovered suspicious donations and led to changes in ActBlue's donation processes, such as requiring CVV codes for credit card donations. - The The Gateway Pundit reported that this scheme could expose a massive network of dark money operations in U.S. politics. (Source Clip Full Interview
4:06

HOLEE SHIZZLES‼️ 🚨Arizona Senator Uncovers Alleged ACTBLUE 'Magic Mortgage' Money Laundering Scheme" — "Billions in Dark Money” Set up by OBAMA to Spread Cash Around the United States - Arizona State Senator Mark Finchem discusses a "Magic Mortgage" money laundering scheme allegedly tied to ActBlue, a major Democratic fundraising platform. - The scheme involves purchasing properties for $200,000 and then creating $200 million mortgages, with funds laundered through wire transfers via title companies. - Finchem claims these transactions lack traditional lenders and involve ActBlue corporate officers, with evidence found across the nation. - The investigation, led by Finchem and whistleblower Shawn Taylor, suggests this could be one of the largest financial crimes in U.S. history, involving BILLIONS in illicit funds. - Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's ongoing investigation into ActBlue, initiated in December 2023, has already uncovered suspicious donations and led to changes in ActBlue's donation processes, such as requiring CVV codes for credit card donations. - The The Gateway Pundit reported that this scheme could expose a massive network of dark money operations in U.S. politics. (Source Clip Full Interview

MJTruthUltra

116,501 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

BREAKING: James O'Keefe Confronts ActBlue Staff at DNC Convention Over False Donations O'Keefe Infiltrates ActBlue at DNC: “What is disinformation about the FEC?” questions James O'Keefe at the Democratic Party convention, challenging Carolyn Schuette (@schuette_car), ActBlue’s account manager, moments after revealing his undercover disguise and infiltrating ActBlue. O’Keefe confronts Schuette about ActBlue’s recent public statement accusing O’Keefe Media Group of spreading a “disinformation campaign.” When O'Keefe questions why “the FEC website had hundreds of donations in the name of a specific person” who had never made the donations, Schuette responds, “That is all based in, out of, falsities,” adding that the claims are “not based” and suggesting that information about donations on the Federal Election Commission (FEC) website is false. Schuette, recognizing O'Keefe, quickly flees when he questions her. O'Keefe presses further, asking, “Why did you lie and say your name wasn’t Carolyn?” As O'Keefe pursues Schuette, Ezekiel Morris of Halo Security Group intervenes, accusing O'Keefe and OMG of harassment, saying, “You guys are following her around and harassing her.” O'Keefe responds by highlighting the gravity of the situation, stating, “There’s money laundering occurring on the FEC website… and we’re trying to get to the bottom of it.” Despite the security intervention, O'Keefe persists at the DNC convention to confront ActBlue staff about the massive donations that individuals across the country testify they never made. Miquel K Smith Jose Gamboa Rebecca Marques The FEC Election Watch
13:20

BREAKING: James O'Keefe Confronts ActBlue Staff at DNC Convention Over False Donations O'Keefe Infiltrates ActBlue at DNC: “What is disinformation about the FEC?” questions James O'Keefe at the Democratic Party convention, challenging Carolyn Schuette (@schuette_car), ActBlue’s account manager, moments after revealing his undercover disguise and infiltrating ActBlue. O’Keefe confronts Schuette about ActBlue’s recent public statement accusing O’Keefe Media Group of spreading a “disinformation campaign.” When O'Keefe questions why “the FEC website had hundreds of donations in the name of a specific person” who had never made the donations, Schuette responds, “That is all based in, out of, falsities,” adding that the claims are “not based” and suggesting that information about donations on the Federal Election Commission (FEC) website is false. Schuette, recognizing O'Keefe, quickly flees when he questions her. O'Keefe presses further, asking, “Why did you lie and say your name wasn’t Carolyn?” As O'Keefe pursues Schuette, Ezekiel Morris of Halo Security Group intervenes, accusing O'Keefe and OMG of harassment, saying, “You guys are following her around and harassing her.” O'Keefe responds by highlighting the gravity of the situation, stating, “There’s money laundering occurring on the FEC website… and we’re trying to get to the bottom of it.” Despite the security intervention, O'Keefe persists at the DNC convention to confront ActBlue staff about the massive donations that individuals across the country testify they never made. Miquel K Smith Jose Gamboa Rebecca Marques The FEC Election Watch

James O'Keefe

743,895 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Is El-Sayed's Campaign Funded by Elderly Fake Donors? ActBlue says an 88-year-old widow has given over $150k to Dems over the past five years, but she says that's not possible By Charlie LeDuff Charlie LeDuff Milan — Out in the country on a rutted dirt road lined with corn lives an old woman and her dog. Elizabeth Waffle, 88, was forced to move into a shabby trailer two years ago after her house burned down. She owns an old pickup truck but no computer. Nevertheless, Waffle, who lives on a modest pension, is a true believer in liberal causes and continues to make small political donations by way of ActBlue—the Democrat online fundraising platform. But somehow, those few dozen small donations she has made over the past five years have transmogrified into 14,696 donations totaling more than $150,000—the equivalent of eight donations a day, every day for the past five years, averaging $9.18. “One hundred and fifty thousand?” Waffle said with real surprise. “Hell no. I don’t have that kind of money.” She says she has contributed to Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic Socialist running for Michigan’s U.S. Senate seat, but not 47 times spanning the last two years, as federal filings show. El-Sayed promises to get money out of politics. He makes a great show of refusing corporate PAC money. But that’s just wordplay. El-Sayed does take special interest money. He takes money from his father-in-law. Most concerning, he takes money from ActBlue. The subject of multiple investigations, the fundraising platform is accused of “rinsing” foreign money and massive private donations by using the stolen names and addresses of real, often elderly Americans to fabricate hundreds of small-dollar donations. Names like Elizabeth Waffle. ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones recently invoked her Fifth Amendment rights 22 times during a congressional hearing regarding foreign contributions. According to FEC campaign contributions compiled by Bob Cushman, ActBlue shows Waffle donating from her trailer, even though she has no computer and spotty internet access. It also shows her donating from an apartment she rented in town two years ago after her house burned down. Sometimes it shows Waffle donating from both the trailer and the apartment on the same day. It shows her donating to out-of-state candidates she’s never heard of. “This is very abnormal,” said Waffle, who sat in the trailer threshold looking over the paperwork I had brought. “I think it’s wrong, and I think there’s something in there that’s off.” El-Sayed’s campaign brags that he’s the top Michigan fundraiser off the ActBlue platform, having raised 10 times the money from small-dollar donors than his primary opponent, Haley Stevens. Stevens has also taken ActBlue money. As has Slotkin, Whitmer, Nessel, Benson, Gilchrist, and the entire Democrat gang. But it is Abdul who plays the sanctimony card. If he is really serious about getting corrupt money out of politics, then he ought to get off ActBlue and return the money. Anything else is elder abuse.
4:16

Is El-Sayed's Campaign Funded by Elderly Fake Donors? ActBlue says an 88-year-old widow has given over $150k to Dems over the past five years, but she says that's not possible By Charlie LeDuff Charlie LeDuff Milan — Out in the country on a rutted dirt road lined with corn lives an old woman and her dog. Elizabeth Waffle, 88, was forced to move into a shabby trailer two years ago after her house burned down. She owns an old pickup truck but no computer. Nevertheless, Waffle, who lives on a modest pension, is a true believer in liberal causes and continues to make small political donations by way of ActBlue—the Democrat online fundraising platform. But somehow, those few dozen small donations she has made over the past five years have transmogrified into 14,696 donations totaling more than $150,000—the equivalent of eight donations a day, every day for the past five years, averaging $9.18. “One hundred and fifty thousand?” Waffle said with real surprise. “Hell no. I don’t have that kind of money.” She says she has contributed to Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic Socialist running for Michigan’s U.S. Senate seat, but not 47 times spanning the last two years, as federal filings show. El-Sayed promises to get money out of politics. He makes a great show of refusing corporate PAC money. But that’s just wordplay. El-Sayed does take special interest money. He takes money from his father-in-law. Most concerning, he takes money from ActBlue. The subject of multiple investigations, the fundraising platform is accused of “rinsing” foreign money and massive private donations by using the stolen names and addresses of real, often elderly Americans to fabricate hundreds of small-dollar donations. Names like Elizabeth Waffle. ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones recently invoked her Fifth Amendment rights 22 times during a congressional hearing regarding foreign contributions. According to FEC campaign contributions compiled by Bob Cushman, ActBlue shows Waffle donating from her trailer, even though she has no computer and spotty internet access. It also shows her donating from an apartment she rented in town two years ago after her house burned down. Sometimes it shows Waffle donating from both the trailer and the apartment on the same day. It shows her donating to out-of-state candidates she’s never heard of. “This is very abnormal,” said Waffle, who sat in the trailer threshold looking over the paperwork I had brought. “I think it’s wrong, and I think there’s something in there that’s off.” El-Sayed’s campaign brags that he’s the top Michigan fundraiser off the ActBlue platform, having raised 10 times the money from small-dollar donors than his primary opponent, Haley Stevens. Stevens has also taken ActBlue money. As has Slotkin, Whitmer, Nessel, Benson, Gilchrist, and the entire Democrat gang. But it is Abdul who plays the sanctimony card. If he is really serious about getting corrupt money out of politics, then he ought to get off ActBlue and return the money. Anything else is elder abuse.

Michigan Enjoyer

1,826,111 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Top ActBlue Donor in Colorado Questions $230K in Donations: 'I’ve Been Retired So I don’t Have Steady Income' Amid Fundraising Suspicions "No, my money’s not being stolen. There’s nothing there to steal," insists Sonia ImMasche, a retired Colorado resident, who has reportedly donated over $230,000 to ActBlue from 2017 to 2023. Living in a retirement home and having been retired for 21 years, ImMasche finds it hard to believe she could have contributed such a large amount. "It’s kind of expensive to live here, and I’ve been retired for 21 years, so I don’t necessarily have steady income," she explains, raising doubts about the legitimacy of these donations in her name. ImMasche's concerns are compounded by a 2014 The New York Times article that featured her as a top donor for ActBlue, where she remarked, "It can get addictive" to keep donating. Reflecting on her history of contributions, she admits, "I started out giving like $25 a month." However, she has since scaled back, saying, "Now I'm down to $10 and $15 at the most." Despite her conviction that no one is using her name fraudulently, ImMasche acknowledges that her son was alarmed by the volume of contributions, stating, "My son was having a breakdown. He was tracking my credit card and was going, ‘My God, you're donating way too much to politics.’" While she stands by the small amounts, she admits, "I’ve cut back quite a bit. Living here has kind of cut into my finances." ImMasche’s situation is part of a larger pattern emerging across the country, where donors are linked to massive sums they struggle to account for. Phil Weiser ActBlue The FEC Election Watch
8:24

Top ActBlue Donor in Colorado Questions $230K in Donations: 'I’ve Been Retired So I don’t Have Steady Income' Amid Fundraising Suspicions "No, my money’s not being stolen. There’s nothing there to steal," insists Sonia ImMasche, a retired Colorado resident, who has reportedly donated over $230,000 to ActBlue from 2017 to 2023. Living in a retirement home and having been retired for 21 years, ImMasche finds it hard to believe she could have contributed such a large amount. "It’s kind of expensive to live here, and I’ve been retired for 21 years, so I don’t necessarily have steady income," she explains, raising doubts about the legitimacy of these donations in her name. ImMasche's concerns are compounded by a 2014 The New York Times article that featured her as a top donor for ActBlue, where she remarked, "It can get addictive" to keep donating. Reflecting on her history of contributions, she admits, "I started out giving like $25 a month." However, she has since scaled back, saying, "Now I'm down to $10 and $15 at the most." Despite her conviction that no one is using her name fraudulently, ImMasche acknowledges that her son was alarmed by the volume of contributions, stating, "My son was having a breakdown. He was tracking my credit card and was going, ‘My God, you're donating way too much to politics.’" While she stands by the small amounts, she admits, "I’ve cut back quite a bit. Living here has kind of cut into my finances." ImMasche’s situation is part of a larger pattern emerging across the country, where donors are linked to massive sums they struggle to account for. Phil Weiser ActBlue The FEC Election Watch

James O'Keefe

1,330,506 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Texas AG Ken Paxton Announces MASSIVE Lawsuit Against ActBlue for Election FRAUD, Foreign Money Laundering for Democrats Paxton’s office tested ActBlue themselves and proved they’re allowing donations without proper ID checks. He says it may be the biggest political money laundering scheme in history. "They’re actually raising money illegally. And it has a dramatic impact on elections when foreigners can donate money and they can take money from people that they’re not disclosing. They're completely violating our laws and they are impacting our elections." "This is being funded largely through illegal donations, particularly illegal donations from foreign countries. So we have foreign actors who are influencing our elections and directing elections the way they want instead of what U.S. citizens would prefer." The Democrats' money machine is finally getting dragged into court. Democrats have been screaming about “election interference” for years. Meanwhile, their own fundraising platform may have been wide open to actual foreign interference.
7:38

Texas AG Ken Paxton Announces MASSIVE Lawsuit Against ActBlue for Election FRAUD, Foreign Money Laundering for Democrats Paxton’s office tested ActBlue themselves and proved they’re allowing donations without proper ID checks. He says it may be the biggest political money laundering scheme in history. "They’re actually raising money illegally. And it has a dramatic impact on elections when foreigners can donate money and they can take money from people that they’re not disclosing. They're completely violating our laws and they are impacting our elections." "This is being funded largely through illegal donations, particularly illegal donations from foreign countries. So we have foreign actors who are influencing our elections and directing elections the way they want instead of what U.S. citizens would prefer." The Democrats' money machine is finally getting dragged into court. Democrats have been screaming about “election interference” for years. Meanwhile, their own fundraising platform may have been wide open to actual foreign interference.

Benny Johnson

45,050 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

The ActBlue House Hearing today proved this true: ActBlue is how Democrats launder large foreign money disguised as small individual donors ‌ Kamala Harris Campaign “Swiss billionaire, lives in Wyoming made $20 million donation broken down into 1.6 million individual donations across 400,000 donors. The scale of fraud that is now being alleged is mind blowing.” ‌ FULL: “Everyone’s talking about all this massive influx of money that has come into the now Kamala campaign. It's absolutely bizarre. So where is all this money coming from? Swiss billionaire, apparently, lives in Wyoming. It's just crazy. ‌ This is who is making all these donations. ‌ The Harris campaign is using ActBlue $20,000,000 from Hansjörg Wyss broken down into over, ready with this? $20,000,000 broken down into 1,600,000 donations. 1.6 million individual individual donations across 400,000 donors. The scale of fraud that is now being alleged is mind blowing.” This is incredibly fraudulent because this allows Democrat politicians to say things like they have huge amounts of small individual donors (regular everyday American) When in reality it’s billionaires breaking up massive payments into hundreds of thousands of small payments and laundering it to Democrats House Administration Committee held a hearing on ActBlue today which directly addressed concerns about foreign donation They noted that ActBlue’s model of processing millions of small donations, often under reporting thresholds or harder to verify individually, complicates tracing All those small donations are from a large foreign donation that’s been broken up The hearing went over allegations of straw donor schemes, where large contributions are split into smaller ones using other people’s names and identities without consent James O’Keefe has also exposed this People need to go to jail
1:40

The ActBlue House Hearing today proved this true: ActBlue is how Democrats launder large foreign money disguised as small individual donors ‌ Kamala Harris Campaign “Swiss billionaire, lives in Wyoming made $20 million donation broken down into 1.6 million individual donations across 400,000 donors. The scale of fraud that is now being alleged is mind blowing.” ‌ FULL: “Everyone’s talking about all this massive influx of money that has come into the now Kamala campaign. It's absolutely bizarre. So where is all this money coming from? Swiss billionaire, apparently, lives in Wyoming. It's just crazy. ‌ This is who is making all these donations. ‌ The Harris campaign is using ActBlue $20,000,000 from Hansjörg Wyss broken down into over, ready with this? $20,000,000 broken down into 1,600,000 donations. 1.6 million individual individual donations across 400,000 donors. The scale of fraud that is now being alleged is mind blowing.” This is incredibly fraudulent because this allows Democrat politicians to say things like they have huge amounts of small individual donors (regular everyday American) When in reality it’s billionaires breaking up massive payments into hundreds of thousands of small payments and laundering it to Democrats House Administration Committee held a hearing on ActBlue today which directly addressed concerns about foreign donation They noted that ActBlue’s model of processing millions of small donations, often under reporting thresholds or harder to verify individually, complicates tracing All those small donations are from a large foreign donation that’s been broken up The hearing went over allegations of straw donor schemes, where large contributions are split into smaller ones using other people’s names and identities without consent James O’Keefe has also exposed this People need to go to jail

Wall Street Apes

113,492 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Official ActBlue training documents show ActBlue was training their employees to ignore fraud They even trained their employees to let donations come in with fake names and not flag suspicious fraudulent donations from campaigns Democrats actually setup their donation systems to intentionally allow fraud to happen We need prison sentences for prominent Democrats and their donors The next 4 items that I'm about to show you all come from ActBlue's internal policy and training materials, written by ActBlue's own management for ActBlue's own fraud review staff to guide how the company must handle suspicious donations day to day: “First, we've got a security briefing sent to ActBlue staff explaining why certain red flags were not a priority. And I quote, "We are not the primary target of people looking to commit merchant fraud. People who steal credit card information don't try to give that money away." Second, from the onboarding guide given to every new hire on the fraud prevention team, "We want to give our donors the benefit of the doubt and think about the reasons why a contribution is legitimate." trainees were never told to reject a donation over a single suspicious characteristic. One red flag just isn't enough. Give it the benefit of the doubt” Here’s where it gets really criminal “Third, from that same training material, and this one is honestly almost too gross to believe, I quote, "If an otherwise legitimate donor uses a fake name, we would want to accept their donations." Fourth, also from that training material, staff were instructed that when a campaign itself enters a large suspicious donation directly, they should look past it because flagging it might put the campaign in, quote, "an awkward position of having to call their own donor and ask what's going on’” People need to go to prison
3:04

Official ActBlue training documents show ActBlue was training their employees to ignore fraud They even trained their employees to let donations come in with fake names and not flag suspicious fraudulent donations from campaigns Democrats actually setup their donation systems to intentionally allow fraud to happen We need prison sentences for prominent Democrats and their donors The next 4 items that I'm about to show you all come from ActBlue's internal policy and training materials, written by ActBlue's own management for ActBlue's own fraud review staff to guide how the company must handle suspicious donations day to day: “First, we've got a security briefing sent to ActBlue staff explaining why certain red flags were not a priority. And I quote, "We are not the primary target of people looking to commit merchant fraud. People who steal credit card information don't try to give that money away." Second, from the onboarding guide given to every new hire on the fraud prevention team, "We want to give our donors the benefit of the doubt and think about the reasons why a contribution is legitimate." trainees were never told to reject a donation over a single suspicious characteristic. One red flag just isn't enough. Give it the benefit of the doubt” Here’s where it gets really criminal “Third, from that same training material, and this one is honestly almost too gross to believe, I quote, "If an otherwise legitimate donor uses a fake name, we would want to accept their donations." Fourth, also from that training material, staff were instructed that when a campaign itself enters a large suspicious donation directly, they should look past it because flagging it might put the campaign in, quote, "an awkward position of having to call their own donor and ask what's going on’” People need to go to prison

Wall Street Apes

49,989 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Jocelyn Benson’s Grassroots Fundraising Is a Smurf-Ridden Lie A little old lady in Lansing apparently has sent more than $82,000 to Democrats, but says “I don’t think that was me” By Charlie LeDuff Charlie LeDuff Lansing — Linda D. Appling, a 77-year-old retiree, resides in a humble house with a sign in the front door that instructs visitors to try the side door. The side entrance is missing a storm door and the steps are in need of a shoveling. Ms. Appling lives with a young man who can’t manage to get his car started this cold morning because the battery is old and a new battery is beyond his means. Despite these lean circumstances, Ms. Appling is something of a Democratic super donor. According to state and federal campaign filings, Ms. Appling has made 8,738 contributions totaling more than $82,000, a fact that she seems wholly unaware of. “I don’t think that was me to be truthful about it,” said Ms. Appling as she struggled with the ice in her ill-fitting boots and aluminum cane. “I acknowledge that I’ve given some people about $2.50.” According to those filings, she has also contributed to the gubernatorial campaign of Jocelyn Benson, the current Michigan secretary of state, even though she hasn’t made up her mind about governor. “Who do you like for governor?” I asked. “Well now, I have no idea,” she said. “No idea just yet?” “I don’t.” Nevertheless, I showed Ms. Appling a spreadsheet which noted that she has contributed nine months in a row to Benson. The January pledge was $7 and the subsequent eight donations of $2.50 were all paid on the last day of the month. Benson crows about her 32,000 small donors, people like Ms. Appling, who have contributed less than $100, allowing her to raise nearly $5 million in her bid for governor. Benson calls it a grassroots swell. But it appears to be something more nefarious. A random sample of these so-called “small donors” who have contributed to Benson’s campaigns were examined by Bob Cushman, a retired pilot and current citizen journalist. Since November 2022, Benson has raised $5.5 million, with nearly half of that money coming from out-of-state donors, according to Cushman’s research. Nearly all of those contributions were $10 or less. There’s 85-year-old Frank from Maryland who kicked in a total of $100 at six bucks a pop. There’s 84-year-old Fred from Upstate New York who anted up with six contributions of $6. How about 82-year-old Marcella of Surprise, Arizona? It’s no surprise Marcella is all in for Jocelyn with 20 donations of $1 a piece. How is this possible? ActBlue is an online fundraising site designed specifically to raise money for Democrats. People can contribute to candidates through ActBlue or may contribute directly to ActBlue, which in turn donates to Democratic candidates and causes. It has raised $16 billion since its founding in 2004. But ActBlue is ensnared in multiple federal investigations alleging that it has stolen the identities of small donors—usually senior citizens like Ms. Appling—and is using their names to launder larger donations that exceed legal limits. By breaking the large donations into multiple smaller contributions, the amount and the origin of the money is hidden. Several senior staff members from ActBlue abruptly resigned earlier this year following the fraud allegations. Little people like Ms. Appling are called straw donors or smurfs. And Benson—in her capacity as secretary of state—is supposed to protect them. Not use them. “I’ve donated some money for sure,” said Ms. Appling, the Grandma Smurf of south Lansing, “but not this amount.”
2:47

Jocelyn Benson’s Grassroots Fundraising Is a Smurf-Ridden Lie A little old lady in Lansing apparently has sent more than $82,000 to Democrats, but says “I don’t think that was me” By Charlie LeDuff Charlie LeDuff Lansing — Linda D. Appling, a 77-year-old retiree, resides in a humble house with a sign in the front door that instructs visitors to try the side door. The side entrance is missing a storm door and the steps are in need of a shoveling. Ms. Appling lives with a young man who can’t manage to get his car started this cold morning because the battery is old and a new battery is beyond his means. Despite these lean circumstances, Ms. Appling is something of a Democratic super donor. According to state and federal campaign filings, Ms. Appling has made 8,738 contributions totaling more than $82,000, a fact that she seems wholly unaware of. “I don’t think that was me to be truthful about it,” said Ms. Appling as she struggled with the ice in her ill-fitting boots and aluminum cane. “I acknowledge that I’ve given some people about $2.50.” According to those filings, she has also contributed to the gubernatorial campaign of Jocelyn Benson, the current Michigan secretary of state, even though she hasn’t made up her mind about governor. “Who do you like for governor?” I asked. “Well now, I have no idea,” she said. “No idea just yet?” “I don’t.” Nevertheless, I showed Ms. Appling a spreadsheet which noted that she has contributed nine months in a row to Benson. The January pledge was $7 and the subsequent eight donations of $2.50 were all paid on the last day of the month. Benson crows about her 32,000 small donors, people like Ms. Appling, who have contributed less than $100, allowing her to raise nearly $5 million in her bid for governor. Benson calls it a grassroots swell. But it appears to be something more nefarious. A random sample of these so-called “small donors” who have contributed to Benson’s campaigns were examined by Bob Cushman, a retired pilot and current citizen journalist. Since November 2022, Benson has raised $5.5 million, with nearly half of that money coming from out-of-state donors, according to Cushman’s research. Nearly all of those contributions were $10 or less. There’s 85-year-old Frank from Maryland who kicked in a total of $100 at six bucks a pop. There’s 84-year-old Fred from Upstate New York who anted up with six contributions of $6. How about 82-year-old Marcella of Surprise, Arizona? It’s no surprise Marcella is all in for Jocelyn with 20 donations of $1 a piece. How is this possible? ActBlue is an online fundraising site designed specifically to raise money for Democrats. People can contribute to candidates through ActBlue or may contribute directly to ActBlue, which in turn donates to Democratic candidates and causes. It has raised $16 billion since its founding in 2004. But ActBlue is ensnared in multiple federal investigations alleging that it has stolen the identities of small donors—usually senior citizens like Ms. Appling—and is using their names to launder larger donations that exceed legal limits. By breaking the large donations into multiple smaller contributions, the amount and the origin of the money is hidden. Several senior staff members from ActBlue abruptly resigned earlier this year following the fraud allegations. Little people like Ms. Appling are called straw donors or smurfs. And Benson—in her capacity as secretary of state—is supposed to protect them. Not use them. “I’ve donated some money for sure,” said Ms. Appling, the Grandma Smurf of south Lansing, “but not this amount.”

Michigan Enjoyer

58,165 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

MASSIVE ActBlue money laundering operation exposed through home mortgages and is now officially under investigation. ActBlue is laundering cash through phantom real estate deals, turning thousands into hundreds of millions of dollars. You just can't make this stuff up. Democrats get a $200,000 home, create a fake $200,000,000 mortgage on the home and then launder the money through wire transfers. This is just ONE layer of the Democrats enormous money laundering operation through ActBlue. Over 400 carbon-copy donations on a single day led investigators to tons of hyper inflated property "sales" in California and Texas. It was all made up. Multiple transfers in a single day, private cash lenders, no public loan records, and addresses that don’t exist. The pattern mirrors classic Bank Secrecy Act violations, pumping millions into federal races around each election cycle, and is now in the Justice Department’s hands for potential charges under the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020. This also ties into everything currently transpiring including the 2020 election, the fake IDs, ballots, and every NGO and non-profit, including connections to cartels, and big banks, such as TD Bank, who was already fined over $3 billion for letting dirty money be laundered through their systems completely under the radar or with proper oversight. You wonder why they're so desperate and begging for cash. USAID and ActBlue are two of their largest cash flow operations and they are either completely shut down or under investigation and about to be. It's only a matter of time. Source: Grant Stinchfield
4:11

MASSIVE ActBlue money laundering operation exposed through home mortgages and is now officially under investigation. ActBlue is laundering cash through phantom real estate deals, turning thousands into hundreds of millions of dollars. You just can't make this stuff up. Democrats get a $200,000 home, create a fake $200,000,000 mortgage on the home and then launder the money through wire transfers. This is just ONE layer of the Democrats enormous money laundering operation through ActBlue. Over 400 carbon-copy donations on a single day led investigators to tons of hyper inflated property "sales" in California and Texas. It was all made up. Multiple transfers in a single day, private cash lenders, no public loan records, and addresses that don’t exist. The pattern mirrors classic Bank Secrecy Act violations, pumping millions into federal races around each election cycle, and is now in the Justice Department’s hands for potential charges under the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020. This also ties into everything currently transpiring including the 2020 election, the fake IDs, ballots, and every NGO and non-profit, including connections to cartels, and big banks, such as TD Bank, who was already fined over $3 billion for letting dirty money be laundered through their systems completely under the radar or with proper oversight. You wonder why they're so desperate and begging for cash. USAID and ActBlue are two of their largest cash flow operations and they are either completely shut down or under investigation and about to be. It's only a matter of time. Source: Grant Stinchfield

The SCIF

212,707 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Mark Mark Stone: “Can I switch to Iran, please? And specifically, the Minab school attack. 120 children dead, 26 of their teachers. A Sky News investigation released today points to all this being a tragic mistake by America, by the U.S. military. So, could you explain, please, why the President is repeatedly saying it wasn’t America when he hasn’t actually — he says also that he hasn’t even seen the report.” Karoline Leavitt Karoline Leavitt: “I can’t speak to the Sky News investigation, respectfully, because I have not read it. All I can speak to is what the President has said as I speak on his behalf, and the investigation continues. And we would refer you to the Department of War for further questions on it.” Stone: “Following up, if I may.” Leavitt: “Sure.” Stone: “I just want to understand —” Leavitt: “My answer’s not going to change.” Stone: “— I just want to understand why he consistently says, it wasn’t us. We didn’t do this when all the evidence and indeed the preliminary report — and we’ve spoken to a military insider who says this was human error.” Leavitt: “Well, that’s the President’s opinion. And, at the very same time, he has said the Department of War is investigating the matter, and we would refer you to them for any questions with respect to the investigation, which obviously has not been released yet. I would refer you to them for further questions on it. But there’s been — I think the President feels that way because he knows that our military always acts in good faith and absolutely never targets civilians or children, unlike the other side of this conflict, Iran, who is well known for killing women and children and innocent people in their country for a very long time. So, you should focus on that in your reporting.”
3:21

Mark Mark Stone: “Can I switch to Iran, please? And specifically, the Minab school attack. 120 children dead, 26 of their teachers. A Sky News investigation released today points to all this being a tragic mistake by America, by the U.S. military. So, could you explain, please, why the President is repeatedly saying it wasn’t America when he hasn’t actually — he says also that he hasn’t even seen the report.” Karoline Leavitt Karoline Leavitt: “I can’t speak to the Sky News investigation, respectfully, because I have not read it. All I can speak to is what the President has said as I speak on his behalf, and the investigation continues. And we would refer you to the Department of War for further questions on it.” Stone: “Following up, if I may.” Leavitt: “Sure.” Stone: “I just want to understand —” Leavitt: “My answer’s not going to change.” Stone: “— I just want to understand why he consistently says, it wasn’t us. We didn’t do this when all the evidence and indeed the preliminary report — and we’ve spoken to a military insider who says this was human error.” Leavitt: “Well, that’s the President’s opinion. And, at the very same time, he has said the Department of War is investigating the matter, and we would refer you to them for any questions with respect to the investigation, which obviously has not been released yet. I would refer you to them for further questions on it. But there’s been — I think the President feels that way because he knows that our military always acts in good faith and absolutely never targets civilians or children, unlike the other side of this conflict, Iran, who is well known for killing women and children and innocent people in their country for a very long time. So, you should focus on that in your reporting.”

Curtis Houck

29,899 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce