正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Action: Turkey supported Pakistan after Pahalgam. Supplied drones & weapons. Reaction: 1. Turkish products EXCLUDED from India-EU FTA. 99.5% Indian products can move into Turkiye DURY-FREE through Europe, Turkish goods cannot enter India under FTA terms, even if shipped via EU ports🤯 2. Turkish company Celebi Aviation has admitted... show more
0 条评论
暂无评论
原始帖子的评论将显示在这里
![This is Emperor Bahadur Shah ‘Zafar’, the last Caliph of Islamic civilisation. [🎧] In 1857, the Hindustani Muslims united and raised the banners of Jihad to fight against the British to revive Caliphate. The Ottomans played a crucial role in suppressing the Jihad and aiding the British Empire for doing som During the Jihad of 1857, the Ottoman establishment declared the anti-British jihad illegitimate and permitted British troops to pass through Egypt in order to reinforce their forces in India. Viscount Stratford de Redcliffe (1786-1880), the British ambassador to Istanbul, openly thanked the Sultan for supporting Britain and granting free passage to British reinforcements headed for India ——— Yet despite this, Indian Muslims, contributed nearly 21% of the total cost of the Hejaz Railway. Their leadership (the Rampuri 🇮🇳 Indian Jauhar brothers) launched the Khilafat Movement, which heavily financed the Turkish War of Independence. And these are exclusive Indian Muslim (not "South Asian") figures, to understand what's the distinction between them: HEJAZ RAILWAY PROJECT: 🔸Ind-Ms: 841,223 liras (21.03%) 🔸 Pak-BD Ms: 229,006 liras (5.75%) KHILAFAT MOVEMENT: 🔸Total Indian subcon: 1,035,608 liras 🔸Ind-Ms alone: 800,183 liras (77.3%) When Allied powers occupied Istanbul, Indian Muslims responded with a boycott of British goods and consciously preferred Turkish-made products instead. Britain reportedly suffered losses amounting to nearly 20 million dollars (≈175.2 million liras), a substantial portion of which translated into industrial and commercial profit for the Turkish economy. —— During the Khilafat Movement, huge sums were sent to the Turks while the average Indian Muslim remained illiterate, lacked proper healthcare facilities, had little industrialisation, and saw no major scientific or educational revolution or progress. AMU and Jamia alone were not enough. On top of that, Indian Muslims were dying in famines. The Khilafatists even diverted large amounts of money from famine relief funds and sent them to Turkey because, according to them, the suffering of Indian Muslims was not the priority. The Mappila Muslims of Kerala were living in conditions worse than those of many North Indian Dalits, yet even they were expected to donate. Not only did they donate, but they also revolted against the British. As a result, they were brutally crushed and reduced to a pitiful state. During this same period, "Ghazi" Mustafa Kemal presented himself as a great jihadist leader fighting for Islam, only to later abolish the Caliphate himself. Do I lament that? No. I do not care about Mr. Mustafa or the so-called Caliphate. I neither hate them nor love them. What I lament is that our hard-earned resources were spent elsewhere when they could have been directed toward the upliftment of Indian Muslim society itself - something that could have greatly improved the present-day condition of Indian Muslims. ——— Let aside yielding any result, the Khilafatist leaders were ritually humiliated by the Turks when they demanded the answer of abolishing Caliphate.. they were basically told - who the hell are you? (the actual statements are worse). ——— Yet today, let aside the Turks aiding us in return, there exists not even a memorial in Turkey commemorating the sacrifices of Indian Muslims. No Result. Wastage of Resources. No Name. No recognition. One is then compelled to ask: what did all of this ultimately achieve?](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2089657083285115100/amplify_video_thumb/2089655208825794561/img/0ogVFwPmLCQrC5Pf.jpg)
![This short mobile explainer is for all thinking people globally, who have been misled on India's most important news story, the Shri Ram Mandir. Western, Leftist & Islamist media seldom tell you the full story about the Shri Ram Mandir, the grand Hindu Temple in Ayodhya. So here is an abridged summary of it in just 59 seconds: 1. This historic Hindu Ram temple, along with tens of thousands of other Hindu temples, was destroyed by the Islamic invaders of India. 2. A mosque [later referred to as the Babri masjid] was then built right on top of this most sacred of Hindu sites, as they have been on countless other Hindu temples, Jewish synagogues, Christian churches, Sikh gurudwaras and Zoroastrian fire temples all over the world. This is a deliberate pyschological tactic employed to rub that subjugation in further. 3. After a 500-year struggle by Hindus, including through wars of reclamation led by Sikh gurus & armies, The Supreme Court of India finally ruled that Hindus have a right to reclaim their most sacred site. That, in simple terms, is the truth about the Ram Mandir. Its re-instatement symbolises the victory of good over evil, as much as of the revival of Hindu civilisation after 1,000 years of violent subjugation. It is also a pyschological hammer blow to Islamism, whose spokespeople will never accept what millions of gracious Muslims in India do: that the Ram Mandir should never have been destroyed by Islamic rulers in the first place, & that what is happening today is justice & fairness - concepts which are wholly alien to Islamists & the Left. On this momentous day in Indian history, perhaps greater in significance than even 15th August 1947, we invoke the timeless greeting - Jai Siya Ram - from all us at Citti Media. 🚩🕉️ | #Shorts 👉🏼 | Follow & support us, even if just with a share & a like | #RamMandir #Ayodhya #WorldinAyodhya](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1749410388519649299/amplify_video_thumb/1749410321083621376/img/fA70oOCRq-9vUSDL.jpg)
