Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Activists are once again treating sacred fire as a shield, asserting that it transforms public protest into private sanctuary, off-limits to cameras. It’s fair to respectfully ask not to be filmed. But there is no legal, and arguably no moral, obligation to comply. Some of the activists at the...

10,669 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 9

Фото профиля Caryma Sa'd - Lawyer + Political Satirist
Caryma Sa'd - Lawyer + Political Satirist1 год назад

For the record, we’ve filmed and published footage of Muslims, Christians, Jews, and Hindus engaged in acts of public worship at demonstrations. #Toronto #ProtestMania

Фото профиля AwareBears
AwareBears1 год назад

Nothing says we’re “stewards of the land” quite like a jacked up 4x4 truck parked in front of a junky campsite in public park.

Фото профиля Joan Abernethy 🇨🇦🇮🇱🇺🇦
Joan Abernethy 🇨🇦🇮🇱🇺🇦1 год назад

You do such a good job, with your videographer, to keep your cool under these sorts of confrontations. Really well done!!

Фото профиля Watcher
Watcher1 год назад

Of course, progressive virtue signalling through blatant racism and bigotry. Gotta love it! 🙄

Фото профиля Rita
Rita1 год назад

These protests tend to attract the most unintelligent, foul, and often racist individuals. @TorontoCouncil Is there a permit for this sacred fire at the Ontario legislature? Will this be a new tent city on public grounds?

Фото профиля Rising Warrior
Rising Warrior1 год назад

Who the F do these people think they are?

Фото профиля 🏝️ NorthSideCapper 💰
🏝️ NorthSideCapper 💰1 год назад

Good for you for standing your ground. I 100% agree with everything you’ve said and I genuinely believe the mass majority of society are extremely uneducated in terms of the rights of not only themselves but of others. At this point - I gotta imagine it almost feels personal and has lit some sort of fire under your ass given the way you (and other independent journalists) have been treated for essentially doing nothing wrong and/or illegal. I also encourage your camera man (respectfully encourage) to start standing his ground and to stop being bullied/pushed back from his space - if in need of more camera men feel free To shoot me a DM. I respect what you do.

Фото профиля Lisa the pissed off Canadian
Lisa the pissed off Canadian1 год назад

“Your family was shipped in”. What a racist lunatic!

Фото профиля John DeAugostino
John DeAugostino1 год назад

Where’s the parking authority? Is that sacred truck parked illegally?

Похожие видео

He’s filming everyone at the market, but the police say there’s nothing they can do. Whose side are you on? A male videographer (the "auditor"), who is wearing a disguise for anonymity, is filming at an outdoor market. He is confronted by a market organizer (Kaylee Dolan) regarding his filming of vendors and attendees. A law enforcement officer arrives to mediate the dispute. ​The organizer expresses concern that the videographer is making vendors and patrons uncomfortable and asks him to stop or leave. The videographer asserts his right to film in a public area, refusing to comply with her request. ​The responding officer confirms that the videographer is in a public space where he has a legal right to record. The officer acknowledges the organizer's frustration but explains that, as no crime is being committed, he cannot compel the man to stop filming or force him to leave. ​The tension arises from the intersection of constitutional rights and personal expectations of privacy. ​Under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, individuals generally have a protected right to film in public spaces (such as sidewalks, public parks, and plazas). This includes the right to film government officials and police officers performing their duties, as well as things that are plainly visible from those public areas. ​In general, there is no "reasonable expectation of privacy" in a public space. If something can be seen by the naked eye from a location where a person is legally permitted to be, it is typically legal to photograph or record it. ​While filming is a protected activity, it is not absolute. If filming crosses the line into harassment, stalking, or disorderly conduct—or if it is done to "clandestinely" capture private or intimate areas, it can become illegal. In this specific interaction, the officer determined that the videographer’s actions did not meet the legal threshold for a crime, which is why he could not intervene. ​If the market were held on private property rather than public land, the owners or organizers would have the right to set rules regarding photography or to ask people to leave. If someone refuses to leave private property after being asked, they can be cited for trespassing. The officer's inability to remove the videographer suggests that the location was either public property or that the organizer lacked the legal authority to exclude him from that specific area.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

42,667 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Gisela McKay seems busy in 2025. So far she has participated in and/or organized the: ✅ disruption at Chrystia Freeland’s leadership campaign launch; ✅ demonstration outside MP Bill Blair’s (maybe) home; ✅ protest at Boiler Room rave; ✅ sit-in at the Globe and Mail; ✅ distribution of hot food with no hand-washing station at City Hall; ✅ obscenity-laden concert within earshot of public skating rink; and ✅ disruption at municipal budget meeting. This list is not exhaustive, and it is only the end of February. It is reasonable to question whether this sacred fire outside the courthouse is, in fact, a pretence to provoke confrontation with local authorities. Last year, Gisela organized a dance party outside Toronto Police Headquarters that resulted in two arrests, including an Indigenous woman hyped up to the point of allegedly assaulting police (and sustaining injuries herself, including to her eyes). Apparent courthouse fire keeper Jordn Scum is involved in the same protest scene, sometimes to his own material detriment. Anyone associated with Gisela opens themselves up to scrutiny based on her track record of exploiting public resources while simultaneously disrupting public order. Law enforcement seems to be taking a laissez faire approach, allowing people to use protest and culture as smokescreens for chaos— even if a permit was obtained (not yet confirmed), disputes cannot be resolved with vigilante violence. The camera stays on if there is a threat of harm. 📸 Feb 27, 2025 #cdnpoli #Toronto #ProtestMania

Caryma Sa'd - Lawyer + Political Satirist

48,571 просмотров • 1 год назад