正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Additional proofs and a simple appeal/request to everyone Recording when I am informing Manisha Swami about Suraj Mohan Recording of a conversation between me and Naorem Jogendrajit Singh Video of Harish Baxla liking my post about corruption in Ministry Conversations with Vijeta Dahiya Videos of Naman Shrivastava on India's... show more
14,620 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)
11 条评论
prnsh❄️1 年前
It's sad to say but it won't matter in the end. This system of corruption and moral degradation is too much for someone to handle. You're fighting cause you may believe Truth prevails in the end. It doesn't. This is an unfair world where mostly powerful wins.
Solar Heavy1 年前
I recorded a rainstorm and played piano
UNBIASED UNIVERSE1 年前
Even judges are corrupt in this country. What can we do?
Muskan1 年前
The silence on the matter from authorities is telling entirely of the situation. Keep strong. We are all with you
Gourav Gope1 年前
Even 5 cr cases are pending in courts. @keshavbedi @rayoniumx You should also post in hindi for better reach.
Raghav Chugh1 年前
I’m your big supporter man. You’re logical but sadly most Indians aren’t. They will still like those laser eyes posts of this corrupt minister who doesn’t even have balls and just a made up puppet. Great Rohan!! Thank you again for outing these leeches one by one!
Mr. X1 年前
You are just a fraud and most probably paid by someone to destroy credibility of MEA as he has been kicking ass of all global hypocrisy . So just get lost before you are fully exposed.
Shadowban Coach1 年前
@grok fact check this
Ryan1 年前
@grok why no media coverage on this
Tutankhamun1 年前
In one video you are concerned about his grammer in other video you say he has got good historical knowledge and again bring Ashwini vaishnaw into this. Akhir kehna kya chahte ho.
AV Gahlawat1 年前
Chl nikl bhadwe ...ldki k chakkr m desh se gaddari krra h tu
相关视频
![Here is another recording of Manisha Swami on the day she was supposed to reprimand Adarsh Kumar Mishra because he was harassing female employees. But instead of doing that, she misused her position, misused the idea that she is a woman and went on a meaningless tirade about Gender sensitization. While listening to this, do remember this is a person who has cleared UPSC and pay attention to everything she says. I would like to know your opinion on how this is a gender sensitization workshop. She says "I can say hello to anybody but nobody can say hello to me". I don't know who she was referring to about being blocked but it was definitely not me. Because last reply from her to me is "Ok". There is a reason foreign policy is in shambles. It's because people like S Jaishankar, Manisha Swami, Suresh Reddy, B Vanlalvawna, Sanjiv Ranjan(IORA, Mauritius), Puneet Agrawal, Monika Aggarwal, Harish Baxla, Suraj Mohan, Gayatri Gosain, Adarsh Kumar Mishra, Yashashri Shukla(CVC) and Puneet Meena (DS[CPIO]&CVC) have been looting the country openly. I have not put even a single name above randomly. If anyone has seen my original complaint, you would have noticed that I had also written highly about good officers in the Ministry. But unfortunately there are very few of these. Otherwise all this would not have happened with me so openly without any restraints. After this case, it will be definitely clear whether India is an Independent nation or a country ruled by corrupt civil servants. I am attaching a copy of the FIR which I have tried to file but which was not accepted by police. In case audio does not play on twitter, here is the link I hope you are listening Narendra Modi PMO India Rahul Gandhi Subramanian Swamy Pawan Khera 🇮🇳 ಪವನ್ ಖೇರಾ Shashi Tharoor Priyanka Chaturvedi🇮🇳 Somnath Bharti सोमनाथ भारती Revant Himatsingka “Food Pharmer” खुरपेंच Anshul Saxena Abhi and Niyu Abhijit Iyer-Mitra Indira Jaising englishaugust Vir Das Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj Mahua Moitra Sagarika Ghose Sucheta Dalal Ramachandra Guha Sonam Wangchuk Sanket Upadhyay Saurav Das Sidhant Sibal ravish ndtv Dr Aniruddha Malpani, MD Sandeep Manudhane Akassh Ashok Gupta Mohak Mangal AajTak NDTV The Hindu IndiaToday Satish Acharya Yogendra Yadav Prakash Raj Zee News Al Jazeera World BBC News Hindi The Wire The Caravan newslaundry Govind Pratap Singh | GPS Manisha Pande I have started something purely out of sheer luck and chance which I hope is going to bring a good change in my country but I hope that world you are listening and that this man Dr. S. Jaishankar is a wolf in sheep's clothing and I hope you are going to definitely ban him United Nations United NationsHumanRights](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1897595989755900394/amplify_video_thumb/1897593456559820800/img/u2eXpqyM0Ba-R2fc.jpg)
![🔥Whitney Webb cuts to the core of "World War III": "[The Trump admin. has] turned the White House into a trading desk, and they're causing all of this volatility because Trump [et al. are]... insider trading all of it." "Pete Hegseth... [is] obviously retarded." "The person behind [Hegseth] is the person running things. And it's Steve Feinberg of Cerberus Capital Management, which [has] on its board... a host of ex-spooks and former top neocon officials." "The U.S. and Israel have horrendous track records when it comes to civilian deaths. And it's nasty and terrible and makes me sick to my stomach that so many innocent people are dying so the rich can get richer." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Jimmy Dore (Jimmy Dore) posted to Rumble on March 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Dore: "Any, any, any comments on the World War III?" Webb: "Oh man, that's very open-ended. Yeah, I think this was clear at the end of Trump's first term, if not earlier than that, that this is where Trump was going to take it because the people he puts in charge, just like he did in his first term, are rebranded neocons. And they are going to try and wealth transfer through endless wars. "And if it's not just endless wars, it will be the downstream economic devastation that the destabilizing effect of this war will have on oil markets that will cause a lot of problems for the rest of us. But not like Trump, not for Trump and his billionaire friends or for the people that are insider trading the information on Polymarket, where insider trading is now legal. Or on Kalshi, where Don, you know, which is also a prediction market where people can bet on world events, and Don Jr. is on the board of that, I believe. "So, you know, it's basically plutocracy. And, unfortunately, the US and Israel have horrendous track records when it comes to civilian deaths. And it's nasty and terrible and makes me sick to my stomach that so many innocent people are dying so the rich can get richer. "I don't know what else to say about it except I would like to point out to people that Pete Hegseth is a clown, but he's not actually in charge. People should be looking at the Deputy Secretary of War who's actually running things because Pete Hegseth doesn't know— I mean he's obviously retarded. "So the person behind him is the person running things. And it's Steve Feinberg of Cerberus Capital Management, which the people on its board are a host of ex-spooks and former top neocon officials. And he used to own DynCorp and other major military contractors and is a very shady dude. He's also very good friends with Peter Thiel and that's why he gave the contract for the Golden Dome to Thiel-connected companies like Anduril who we talked about earlier being brought to Ohio and the Southern Air Transport Airport by Jobs Ohio. "But, you know, we need to pay attention to these people that are actually running stuff. I would like to see a lot more people talking about Steve Feinberg and his role in this war. It's, you know, instead of, you know, Pete Hegseth is a, is a Fox and Friends TV host. He's there to serve that function as the public face to, you know, Boomers that liked watching him on Fox News, hoping that they would trust him when he leads them into war with Iran and boots on the ground and, and whatever. "I mean, it's been crazy to see what's been going on with this war, because a lot of people like to paint it as incompetence, what the Trump administration has been doing in a communications sense. But really what they're doing is that they've turned the White House into a trading desk, and they're causing all of this volatility, because Trump can cause volatility in these markets just by tweeting something or putting something on Truth Social or saying anything. And the Iranians deny it because it's not happening, but he's just saying whatever to swing markets. And they're insider trading all of it."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2037317381371154670/amplify_video_thumb/2037314463544872962/img/b7DC-MvzQVL_zR0V.jpg)
!["There was some pretty intense stuff about lifeforms, what they were doing." ~TB 💥 If Trump Waives Eric Davis' NDAs, Is This Some of What We Can Expect to Hear? 💥 (I may not be first with these clips but I try to include info. that you won't get anywhere else.) If that information about lifeforms, and what they were doing, was accurate, it's the type of information the world deserves to know. Was it Dr. Eric Davis who briefed him/them on that? I have a sneaking suspicion that it was, and I have NOT asked Davis about this.) "All these rumors that you hear...just the wild, crazy stuff, some of that stuff now I'm being briefed on and people are telling me...actually has occurred." ~TB ~ Sean Hannity 🇺🇸: "If I knew what you knew, I would not be able to sleep at night." Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office (TB): "Yeah, I was briefed in a situation, and they got into some pretty intense stuff." Hannity: "Can I ask who briefed you?" Burchett: "You can ask but I can't tell." (Again: My Guess: Dr. Eric Davis. I could be wrong, but it makes a lot of sense to me. Here's why... This is a message from Davis to me, from January... Why Won't Davis Share What He Know with Congress? Davis: "I already shared my information in a Pentagon SCIF with the SASC staff in Oct. 2019 and in a controlled access conference room in a Senate office building with the SSCI staff in Oct. 2019 and at a defense company’s controlled access room in June 2021. "Then I shared it with Rep. Anna Paulina Luna's committee in a House of Representatives office building SCIF last May. (Burchett is part of that committee, and that's one reason why I feel like Davis is the one Burchett is referring to when he says someone briefed him on some intense stuff.) Davis: "So the 'Why won’t he?' has already been answered." Murgia: "So what changes if a President waives your NDAs?" Davis: "If the POTUS were to waive my NDAs, I could share everything I know with the public." (PUBLIC!) ~~~ Hannity: "Have you ever told Donald Trump about all the obstacles they're throwing in your face?" Burchett: "No, I haven't. As a matter of fact, I had a discussion with somebody last week. They said, you need to have lunch with [Trump]. It's very difficult to get, you know, he's, right now, of course, things going on all over the world." Hannity: "But you're also saying, on the other hand, on a need-to-know basis. And that means the President's not on a need-to-know basis? Our duly-elected president, information is being withheld from him?" Burchett: "I believe so. I was told that, even. Yeah, in the SCIF, this one time, where they asked me, where you're quoting, I mean, there was some pretty intense stuff about lifeforms, what they were doing. And different..." Hannity: "Lifeforms alive here? Lifeforms dead here?" Burchett: "Possibly. Both. Both." Hennity: "And vehicles that have been recovered here?" Burchett: "Yeah, and some that have possibly come here, and not in a crash-type setting (laughs). We had an individual that gave..." (Again, this feels like Davis was the guy briefing them. He has spoken about crashed AND landed craft, including the alleged Holloman AFB landing-and-meeting event.) Burchett: "And this was interesting about the whole thing was because, there's all the folks in there, and there's different groups of people, and Rep. Eric Burlison's a dear friend of mine. Because in the beginning, he was a big skeptic (According to Burlison, he still IS a skeptic. ~Joe), you know? And I asked him to join us in some of this stuff because I needed somebody that just wasn't like me, that just had been..." Hannity: "Skepticism's healthy." Burlison: "It's very healthy. I mean, you know...but a lot of people that were skeptics. But we were in this one meeting in a secure environment, and a member came in who is not really friendly to the cause. And really was a disrupter and started asking questions. And the person who was briefing us named names, dates, times, places, events, people." (That sounds exactly like the meticulous, and detail-orientated, Dr. Eric Davis. 😎 ) Burchett: "Because I'd asked a question about Jimmy Carter. There was talk, I just threw it out there, that Carter... I didn't like his politics, but I don't question his faith." (Sad that Burchett even feels the need to mention Carter's politics.) Burchett: "And they said that [Carter] was briefed at one time and became physically upset with the information that he was given." Hannity: "Of course he did." (This seemed like snide remark from Hannity, as in, Carter wasn't a real man and he couldn't handle information like that without getting upset. Cheap shot, but that's Hannity.) Burchett: "Yeah, but he had actually seen a UFO, it's a documented thing. And this person that was briefing us gave the date of that meeting and he gave the receipts. He said, 'You can go to the Carter library,' and he gave the date. and said... And there was, I think four people in the meeting (with Carter), and they listed three of them, and one of them, they weren't sure who it was. So it was probably, you know, CIA or something. And it ended up upsetting [Carter] so much that they pretty much had to clear his calendar for a while. But what is that?" (Again, that sounds like a Davis briefing.) Burchett: "And the thing is, everything that I've...all these rumors that you hear in the movies, in the books and the magazines that I read growing up, just the wild, crazy stuff, some of that stuff now I'm being briefed on and people are telling me that this is actually has occurred. And that, to me, is, I wonder, is this stuff being planted? Is it being pushed out, so that we gradually get a hold of it?" (Hopefully, we get to hear what Burchett and the others heard so we can judge the veracity of it and see if we can somehow confirm any of it.)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2072187421534630291/amplify_video_thumb/2072165532250566656/img/E8fKEAGfEsjiSLXF.jpg)
![💥🛸 Bigelow: I met with Trump in February for 75 minutes and suggested he tell the world this: "A non-human intelligent presence has been on Earth for a very long time, using spacecraft and with performances completely beyond our capabilities, and our human physics." Knapp says a disclosure speech has been written for Trump. But will he ever read it? 🤷🏼♂️ ~ Anchor: "Bigelow, a longtime supporter of President Trump, recently met in the Oval Office and advised the commander in chief what he might want to say to the country." Knapp: "[Bigelow] thinks the time has come for some sort of formal disclosure, and that Trump is the guy to do it. Coincidentally or not, in the five months since their White House meeting, the government has started releasing piles of UFO-related information." Bigelow: "And disclosure was one of the topics. And so, when I was ready, I asked to see him. And so February the 6th, I was in the Oval Office with the president." (Bigelow says he had 75 minutes with Trump, and one topic was Disclosure.) Knapp Voiceover: "Bigelow says a presidential aide cleared off the resolute desk, Bigelow plopped down seven reports on seven subjects and jumped right into UFO disclosure." Bigelow: "I was emphasizing that the disclosure process, starting with confirmation, is a big deal. You know, that really is important for somebody like the president of the United States to say, 'Yeah, they're real. They're here,' and eliminate all the other nonsense, all the noise that's been going on for 80 years." Knapp: "You go into it with an idea of not just things in the sky, floating around, some mystery. We've got the goods. Somewhere, there are crashes. Do you tell them that there are bodies, that there are crash retrieval vehicles of unknown origin, or how specific do you get on that?" Bigelow: "Basically, I focused on him and how to prepare himself if he's not already prepared." Knapp Voiceover: "Bigelow declines to repeat anything the president said in response, not even gestures or facial expressions. The report he wrote for Trump included recaps of some notable, well-documented UFO incidents and cases, along with specific comments that could be shared with the public, including a suggestion that he be delivered in one of the quick exchanges the president has with reporters aboard Air Force One." Bigelow: "And this is what I want you to say, Mr. President: 'A non-human intelligent presence has been on Earth for a very long time, using spacecraft and with performances completely beyond our capabilities and our human physics.' And that's it. To say nothing else. That's it. That's all, because what this is, is disclosure, and it's actually confirmation." Knapp Voiceover: "A primary angle in Bigelow's proposal to the president was a preemptive pardon, amnesty for the private contractors who've helped the government hide the truth for 80 years. Bigelow says he has direct knowledge of aerospace companies which have stashed and analyzed materials and craft of unknown origin. Their expertise will be vital in educating and reassuring the public, he says." Bigelow: "And if it's handled right, it can be done successfully." Knapp: "If you were president, would you announce that yes, we've got crash retrievals, yes, we have reverse engineering programs, and yes, we've got bodies?" Bigelow: "Yeah, because the rest of the world already knows that. The people that count in Russia and China already know." Knapp Voiceover: "In the months since their February meeting, the White House has authorized an ongoing release of UFO files and videos, some of which were already in the public arena, with promises of more releases in the months ahead. "Bigelow isn't the only Trump whisperer interested in the subject. Secretary of State Marco Rubio was one of the most vocal members of Congress urging UFO transparency back when he was a senator. Donald Trump Jr. has raised the subject with his dad. Vice President J.D. Vance says he's fascinated too, but thinks UFOs might be demons. "Bigelow won't say whether he made a dent in Trump's opinion about UFOs and ETs. The president's previous comments have been largely noncommittal, although he has authorized the release of government files. "The strongest part of the pitch might have been Bigelow's suggestion that UFO disclosure would cement Trump's place in history." Bigelow: "The world goes so fast, but the president that took on the challenge of disclosure and of confirmation, and actually built a satisfactory conclusion of a relationship between human beings and that subject, is going to go down in history as having really accomplished something." Knapp in Studio: "With Mr. Bigelow, this started a couple of months ago. A conversation about, let's do some interviews. He wants to get some things off his chest. I'm the guy to do it, and then it turned into a podcast. So he's built his own studio, we recorded a podcast. It's now up on our Mystery Wire site. "A lot of really interesting stuff about his encounter with RFK Jr. Crazy story, and we will be sharing more of that, and then more to come, here, we're going to be recording additional things about what he wants to get off his chest. " Anchor: Well, there's been sort of like these whispers that there's actually a speech prepared for the president, if and when he ever decides to address the nation about this. You think that's some validity?" Knapp: "I've heard those stories. The answer is yes. There's at least one speech that has been written for him now. Whether he's read it or not, I don't know. But if he gets in the mood, it should be sitting right there somewhere in the desk."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2084794758426427674/amplify_video_thumb/2084790190837792768/img/Cyq0m-0xpgjLLyQ3.jpg)
![It’s outrageous that President Donald Trump has threatened to sue the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), say many in the media. “You have to admire the chutzpah,” wrote one columnist. “Donald Trump describing the BBC as ‘corrupt’ while threatening to take legal action….The man has never been known for his self-awareness, so it’s safe to say the irony has almost certainly passed him by.” But there is no question that BBC employees deliberately manipulated Trump’s remarks on January 6, 2021, to make it sound like he had encouraged violence. An independent outside auditor, Michael Prescott, wrote a major report on the BBC’s bias, which concluded that the BBC had “spliced together two clips” to create “the impression that Trump said something he did not and, in doing so, materially misled viewers.” Americans might think this story doesn’t concern them because it’s about a British media company. Few Americans listen to the BBC. But the story is highly relevant to Americans because US news media companies are guilty of manipulating their coverage of Trump, transgenderism, and race in nearly identical ways as the BBC. And given the BBC’s longstanding reputation as one of the most credible news organizations in the world, Prescott’s independent report has rightly sparked a major international media discussion. Over the weekend, the BBC’s CEO and its Director-General both stepped down. “The Future of the BBC is Now in Doubt,” writes Tim Stanley, an influential columnist, in the Daily Telegraph. Prescott’s report should inspire reform-minded owners of US news media companies to clean up their act. For example, CNN falsely claimed that January 6 was an “insurrection” that resulted in the deaths of five people and did a similarly manipulative edit of Trump’s speech, noted an investigator on X, MAZE. “It may not be technically as bad as what the BBC did,” he noted, “because there was a quick flash transition, but the goal was the same. Make the speech sound worse than it was. Take everything out of context and put it together in an order that makes it sound as bad as possible.” Last year, we criticized CNN and other news media for deliberately twisting the meaning of Trump’s remarks about Liz Cheney for being a war hawk, and Prescott makes the same observation. “Mr. Trump was clearly criticising politicians who readily send US troops to war without thinking about the human cost,” he notes. And yet “the BBC repeatedly pushed this inaccurate version of what Trump said.” Readers of Public are aware that we have been critical of the BBC’s fact-checking program, “BBC Verify.” One purpose of BBC Verify appears to be to label stories with which the BBC disagrees as “misinformation” and thus as something that social media platforms should censor. Last year, the BBC’s Director General, Tim Davie, said, “Disinformation, propaganda, and partial news is [sic] weakening our shared understanding of the world, undermining trust in our institutions and our democratic process,” shortly after the BBC had buried a large package of investigative stories on the problems with giving children and adolescents puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. BBC’s first “disinformation” reporter, Mariana Spring, apologized in 2023 after she was caught lying on her resume. Spring remains employed at BBC as its “Social Media Investigations Senior Correspondent.” Prescott described how BBC Verify spread misinformation. “BBC audiences were being encouraged to believe Britain’s major insurers were, intentionally or unintentionally, racist and charging high prices to customers based on their ethnicity,” notes Prescott. “The central claim implied causation, (that being an ethnic minority resulted in you being charged more), but the reporting and commentary did not consider other issues that can affect insurance charges.” Adds Prescott, “the entire report was taken down, which I understand is very rare. It had taken six months for the BBC to take decisive action about a story that was not fit for purpose and spread damaging misinformation. As far as I know, no one has ever been disciplined for this hugely embarrassing episode and worrying questions remain.” Another example of the BBC’s bias concerned a major story about doctors causing serious harm to children, adolescents, and vulnerable adults. Readers of Public will recall that in the Spring of last year, we released documents, The WPATH Files, which a whistleblower had given to us. “In March 2024,” writes Prescott, “there was widespread media coverage of leaked documents from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health [WPATH] which raised concerns about the quality of care given to gender-distressed children. It was picked up by the Mail, Economist, Observer, Washington Post, the Times, and others, but not the BBC.” Prescott points out other examples of the BBC's censorship and bias on transgenderism. It refused to cover detransitioners, people who regretted taking hormones or receiving surgeries in an attempt to change their sex or gender. It didn’t cover a major lawsuit by a group of nurses after their hospital allowed a man to use their changing room. And, beyond WPATH, the BBC gave little to no coverage of the trans medical scandal, even though the UK government has banned puberty blockers. By contrast, the BBC produced “a surprisingly high number of stories about drag queens,” celebrated a male wrestler who competed in the women’s category, and published an article last year headlined, “Transgender woman guilty of rape after night out.” Wrote the reporter, “Lexi Secker, 35, of Lowbourne, near Melksham, was living as a man when she attacked a woman in Blunsdon, Wiltshire, on 23 April 2023.” More information about the scandal may come out. Just today, Cath Leng, BBC’s former chief writer, says she was “forced out” in 2023 after 25 years because she was critical of transgender ideology. Prescott identified other areas of bias, including on race and the war in Gaza, all of which pointed to a single significant underlying problem. “My view is that the Executive repeatedly failed to implement measures to resolve highlighted problems, and in many cases simply refused to acknowledge there was an issue at all,” he writes. “Indeed, I would argue that the Executive’s attitude when confronted with evidence of serious and systemic problems is now a systemic problem in itself - meaning the last recourse for action is the Board.” All of this is deeply damaging to the BBC, regardless of whether Trump decides to sue it. “BBC staff have destroyed their own trump card in future negotiations over the licence fee,” writes Stanley at the Daily Telegraph. “The problem is this: in the modern, post-TV world, the licence fee is entirely unjustifiable. The BBC has to explain why, when there’s so much else available, it should be allowed to compel us to pay for it – just when tastes are diverging, national identity is fractured and the quality of the BBC’s output is in doubt…” What, then, explains the BBC’s fall from grace? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1988024092369580483/amplify_video_thumb/1988021879752585217/img/pOLnED3lYtZKTBP9.jpg)
0:05
Sensitive content
Alright. I’m honestly relieved that this is finally coming out, so we can finally put an end to the fairytale conspiracies about March 4, courtesy of Joe Flipperhead and the ratchet harem. Since Aidan and his Dollar-Tree-sidekick Chelsea want to drag March 4th into the public arena, let’s do it properly– with facts, not the fairy tale he’s been feeding everyone. The rumors flying around are completely untrue, and I’ve wanted to defend myself for weeks, but Aidan has spent the last month threatening me, telling people that if the truth ever came out he’d “turn me into the next Lindsey,” that everyone would believe him because he has a platform, and even declaring he’d tell his followers to contact my work. Well, here we are. Since he chose to drag this into the public and sic his ratchet brigade on me, I’m finally telling the actual story. That night wasn’t some dramatic “Meredith tried to send me to jail” moment. It was a drunk, disgusting fight between two adults—the kind Aidan has on rotation with every woman he dates. Both of us were very intoxicated, but he was blackout drunk, verbally abusive, and filming me against my will. I told him to stop. He didn’t. I’d found out about him sexting another girl and had bottled up emotions for months, which is what started the argument. I asked him to leave after he said horrible things to me, including calling me fat and useless, that people only like me because I’m “Turtleboy’s girlfriend”. I asked him to leave and he began recording me, pointing a phone in my face while I repeatedly told him to stop. He lost his own key, and because he couldn’t remember anything, he made up a story that I “stole it.” Imagine spreading this fantasy when I have him on video of me asking him to return MY KEYS? I was uncomfortable, overwhelmed, and didn’t want a drunken fight being filmed. He took our feud out into the common area of my building, disturbing other tenants. So yes, I said “you hit me,” specifically because I believed he wouldn’t share the video if I said that. I said it so he would STOP RECORDING ME, and he has a full video that I clearly say, “I’m only saying that so you’ll stop recording me.” I never reported anything to the police, never intended to, never would. He knows this. We discussed this fact many times the next day and several occasions in the last few months. That context has been deliberately cut out to push a fake narrative, but don’t worry, I’ll be posting the full videos that I took of that night. When he’s threatened me with releasing this very video, he admitted it would be edited out and no one would believe me over him. Meanwhile, the victim cosplay he’s doing now? Pathetic. He claims he was “stuck” in my house. Reality: I asked him to leave over and over. This narrative that he was somehow stuck there held hostage is simply not true. Reality: I have video of him refusing to get out of my bed, not “sleeping on the couch.” Reality: I have video of him screaming at me like a lunatic. Reality: He lost his key because he was hammered, then somehow turned that into me “stealing it.” Reality: He was causing a huge scene in my apartment throwing a literal temper tantrum on the floor. With other tenants in the building, I was genuinely concerned someone would call the police. He also lies that I tried to keep him from court the next day. Reality? I gave him my car so he could get to court. I sat in the passenger seat half-dead from a hangover while chauffeuring Captain Accountability to his court date. I sat next to him during court, then eventually throwing up in a bag on the way home. Then he used that same car to drive to his house for his spare key, and back again. I supported him through the entire aftermath, like I did every time. But now he’s trying to pretend he was some endangered baby deer and I was plotting to Lindsay him? Get real. This narrative that I was somehow trying to get him arrested? An absolutely disgusting lie considering the trauma that situation caused him. Not to mention the countless hours I spent during our 1.5 year relationship assisting with his legal defense to keep him OUT of jail. He knows it’s not true. He knows exactly what happened. Do you really think if his narrative were true, he’d stay with me for months to come and not file his own police report? But he also knows he thrives off playing victim, and he knows he has people willing to believe anything he says without question. Over the last month, behind the scenes with recording gate, he’s been telling me and others that if I ever spoke up, he’d ruin me. That he’d twist the story because he has the bigger platform. That he’d make sure people contacted my job. He has leaked private texts, sent people after me, and used Chelsea, a woman he cheated on me with, to push his manufactured victim narrative. But here’s the truth: Aidan is not the victim of March 5th. He was drunk, verbally abusive, refusing to leave, and escalating a situation he then turned around and weaponized. And like every situation he touches, every feud, every fallout, every “enemy,” every messy disaster, he plays the same role: the powerless victim of consequences he created. At some point, people need to recognize the common denominator. I stayed silent because I didn’t want this ugliness public. I didn’t want to embarrass him. I didn’t want to rehash something painful, private, and humiliating for both of us. But since he chose to send CamelToe Joe and his ratchet harem to post private fights, twist reality, and smear me, I’m done being quiet. Aidan is incapable of having a private relationship and ending. And Chelsea…hun. I know your brain cells are limited, but your "insurance" explanation makes no sense. When did he send you this video? Months after it happened? Why would you need insurance at that point? You’re being used like a scratch-off ticket from Cumberland Farms. He feeds you a cropped video and suddenly you’re Nancy Drew with a nicotine patch? Please. You weren’t even in the picture until after he was done cheating with you. These videos paint a wildly different picture of the fake victim narrative CamelToe Joe has been pushing, huh? I’ll be posting more soon, about the recording, about every single lie he has chosen to spread through his minions the last two months. I guess I was crazy to think Aidan would ever be okay with someone walking away and moving on peacefully. Since Aidan wanted the truth out, he's about to get it. PS- Speaking of men being fake scared of women– Funny how some people with very chaotic personal histories suddenly decide they’re the moral authority on my life, enough so to peddle lies on their large platforms. If I had these kinds of pasts, I'd probably sit this one out, and maybe stop throwing stones from your glass basements and (mom’s) houses.
The old M can’t come to the phone right now
122,740 次观看 • 8 个月前
