Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

After losing the argument, typical “Obidients” have resorted to spreading false & malicious information suggesting that Felix Morka, APC NPS, threatened Peter Obi's life. As clip & transcript show, Morka's answer to ARISE NEWS question contains no threat, whatsoever, against anyone

APC Nigeria

1,012,497 subscribers

49,083 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнес Новости и политика Юмор

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Chi ❤️

Chi ❤️1 год назад

@PeterObi @ARISEtv They'll be no country to govern if anything happens to Peter Obi

Фото профиля Vivian Umukoro

Vivian Umukoro1 год назад

@PeterObi @ARISEtv You people act like you will live forever, when I remember what you asinine’s did to Goodluck Jonathan I feel earthquake should swallow you all. Wicked and soulless party .

Фото профиля Concerned Citizen

Concerned Citizen1 год назад

If Felix said nothing wrong, why all this plenty explanation & grammar? “He has CROSSED the line so many times and he has COMING to him, whatever he GETS, he should MANAGE it” So the above phrase is a compliment? What does he have COMING to him? Which line are we talking about? Who drew it? A threat to life was made. This is clear cyberstalking at play. 💯

Фото профиля Concerned Citizen

Concerned Citizen1 год назад

The utterances made by Felix Morka were not only threatening but also inciteful and a dog whistle to violence. Public speakers/officials should endeavor to be measured and more circumspect when they speak. Emotional intelligence is key. I advise that H. E. Peter Obi should not take this threat lightly.

Фото профиля Unique Uche

Unique Uche1 год назад

@PeterObi @ARISEtv Please can you read your post again. "Whatever he has coming for him, whatever he get, he has to manage it". If this is not a threat to whatever he gets including his life...how do you define a threat?

Фото профиля DinoSpeaks 1

DinoSpeaks 11 год назад

@PeterObi @ARISEtv Whatever you like you can say but evidence from the interview clearly suggests a threat to Mr Peter Obi and the interests he represents. If anyone uses such line on any APC official by now the DSS and the police would have arrested the person. Let nothing happen to Peter Obi else

Фото профиля Mgbadike 1 Of Enugu

Mgbadike 1 Of Enugu1 год назад

@PeterObi @ARISEtv We are waiting for you to carry out your threat. All eyes on you and the federal government.

Фото профиля David Eboh

David Eboh1 год назад

APC is reputed for violence, aggression, intimidation, misuse and abuse of the powers of the police, judiciary and army. The members and followers are miles apart from language of diplomacy, national peace, justice and unity. For them, it’s mostly ethnic bigotry, religious hatred and greed.

Фото профиля JUSTICE!

JUSTICE!1 год назад

@PeterObi @ARISEtv If you want earthquake to happen in Nigeria, today, touch Peter Obi. Y’all serving a criminal drug Baron, and @ChicagoState diploma certificate forger, Bola Tinubu, try out your plans, let’s see! F*cking Im:beciles!

Фото профиля olasupo jakes

olasupo jakes1 год назад

@PeterObi @ARISEtv APC hates Peter Obi so much because his message resonates with the people. @Morka2Felix with his Morka foam brain is an idi0t.

Похожие видео

I Have Received 400 Threats From Pro-Obi Supporters - Morka I did not threaten Peter Obi. Nothing I said in my interview with ARISE News even remotely suggests that I was asking for anything regarding Peter Obi. I only responded to a reference that described Peter Obi as a "prophet of doom" and a "Voodoo Economist." I supported this claim by stating that Obi has brought this on himself, implying that he deserves that label because he has crossed several lines of truth. However, since my interview and Obi's subsequent reaction, I have documented over 400 threats, 200 of which are death threats. Felix Morka, APC National Publicity Secretary.

I Have Received 400 Threats From Pro-Obi Supporters - Morka I did not threaten Peter Obi. Nothing I said in my interview with ARISE News even remotely suggests that I was asking for anything regarding Peter Obi. I only responded to a reference that described Peter Obi as a "prophet of doom" and a "Voodoo Economist." I supported this claim by stating that Obi has brought this on himself, implying that he deserves that label because he has crossed several lines of truth. However, since my interview and Obi's subsequent reaction, I have documented over 400 threats, 200 of which are death threats. Felix Morka, APC National Publicity Secretary.

ARISE NEWS

500,991 просмотров • 1 год назад

Tinubu & Atiku Pressured Me to Leave Peter Obi But I Refused – Isa El-Buba This video was in 2023 before the election and when I watched this video again, two things came to my mind. 1. The hypocrisy on the side of Atiku and Tinubu's camp. Remember how they were dismissing us back then that we don't have structure and that we were just on social media but after saying all of that they would secretly be going after Obi's supporters. So they actually knew that Obi was going to win the election. 2. Secondly, I also realised that they are doing the same thing now. They are bringing up false narratives like the situation is no longer the same. Obi's support base was just the church. They are still dismissing Obi's chances as they did in 2023 which tells me that Obi will still win as he did in 2023. The lesson here for us Obidients is to ignore their narratives and focus on our work of promoting Peter Obi.

Tinubu & Atiku Pressured Me to Leave Peter Obi But I Refused – Isa El-Buba This video was in 2023 before the election and when I watched this video again, two things came to my mind. 1. The hypocrisy on the side of Atiku and Tinubu's camp. Remember how they were dismissing us back then that we don't have structure and that we were just on social media but after saying all of that they would secretly be going after Obi's supporters. So they actually knew that Obi was going to win the election. 2. Secondly, I also realised that they are doing the same thing now. They are bringing up false narratives like the situation is no longer the same. Obi's support base was just the church. They are still dismissing Obi's chances as they did in 2023 which tells me that Obi will still win as he did in 2023. The lesson here for us Obidients is to ignore their narratives and focus on our work of promoting Peter Obi.

Advocacy For Good Governance

60,916 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

“Just lies. Absolute bullshit,” says Latvian blogger Maksometr, reflecting on his new life in Belarus. Maksometr used to spread a lot of false information about life in Latvia - including that Latvia was mining the border to prevent Latvians from fleeing to Russia and Belarus. His supporters from Russia and Belarus urged him to save himself and come live a better life with them. He actually took up their offers and moved to Belarus in 2023. Alas, as he now laments, life there turned out not to be so great. Not only that, his donations appear to have declined significantly after he left Latvia, suggesting that much of his audience was only interested in him spreading anti-Latvian content from the inside.

“Just lies. Absolute bullshit,” says Latvian blogger Maksometr, reflecting on his new life in Belarus. Maksometr used to spread a lot of false information about life in Latvia - including that Latvia was mining the border to prevent Latvians from fleeing to Russia and Belarus. His supporters from Russia and Belarus urged him to save himself and come live a better life with them. He actually took up their offers and moved to Belarus in 2023. Alas, as he now laments, life there turned out not to be so great. Not only that, his donations appear to have declined significantly after he left Latvia, suggesting that much of his audience was only interested in him spreading anti-Latvian content from the inside.

Bad Baltic Takes

31,857 просмотров • 4 дней назад

NEW: FBI Director Kash Patel responds to Candace Owens' claims, including alleged assassination threats against her & her claims against TPUSA. Megyn Kelly: Do you believe that Tyler Robinson is the man who killed Charlie Kirk? Patel: Yes ... Kelly: Do you believe any foreign government had a role in his assassination? Patel: At this time, the FBI doesn't have credible information to connect any foreign governments to it... Kelly: Do you have any credible reason to believe that anyone connected with the Turning Point organization had anything to do with Charlie's death? Patel: Zero. Kelly: Do you believe [Candace] received a credible death threat from the French or that the French had something potentially to do with Charlie's death? Patel: Any American that receives a death threat from overseas or anywhere in America is going to be fully investigated... We are just looking at everything that comes in. We're not gonna reject any piece of information. If someone feels that their life is being threatened, we are, of course, looking at it. Kelly: Do you have any reason to believe that that text exchange was not real between Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs? Patel: We present that information to the prosecutors to make the determination based on the evidence we have as to whether or not they were real ... I don't believe the prosecutors in the state of Utah would be using any piece of information or evidence that was not credible.

NEW: FBI Director Kash Patel responds to Candace Owens' claims, including alleged assassination threats against her & her claims against TPUSA. Megyn Kelly: Do you believe that Tyler Robinson is the man who killed Charlie Kirk? Patel: Yes ... Kelly: Do you believe any foreign government had a role in his assassination? Patel: At this time, the FBI doesn't have credible information to connect any foreign governments to it... Kelly: Do you have any credible reason to believe that anyone connected with the Turning Point organization had anything to do with Charlie's death? Patel: Zero. Kelly: Do you believe [Candace] received a credible death threat from the French or that the French had something potentially to do with Charlie's death? Patel: Any American that receives a death threat from overseas or anywhere in America is going to be fully investigated... We are just looking at everything that comes in. We're not gonna reject any piece of information. If someone feels that their life is being threatened, we are, of course, looking at it. Kelly: Do you have any reason to believe that that text exchange was not real between Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs? Patel: We present that information to the prosecutors to make the determination based on the evidence we have as to whether or not they were real ... I don't believe the prosecutors in the state of Utah would be using any piece of information or evidence that was not credible.

Collin Rugg

748,476 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Reminder That Absolutely Nothing Has Come From The FBI Admitting On The Record A Document Exists Showing Joe Biden Took A $5 Million Dollar Bribe But They Can’t Release The Information Because The Whistleblower Would Be Killed Josh Hawley: You just started to answer Senator Blackburn's question that not releasing the 1023 are talking about as a matter of life and death question of life and death you said. Explain. FBI: It is potentially a question of life or death for whom regard to the source of the information Josh Hawley: So okay. So now we've confirmed that the document exists. That's progress because the FBI director initially denied that it exists. Why did he do that? FBI: We have already and previously acknowledged the existence of the documents. Josh Hawley: Yeah. After you first denied it. Now when a member of this committee read it Right. The FBI let's just get the record straight. The FBI director initially said it doesn't exist. Josh Hawley: —Why don't you just release it? Is it classified? FBI: The document is not classified. Josh Hawley: K. Will you commit to releasing it? FBI: Senator, we'll take that back, and we will work with you and this committee. Josh Hawley: How about just a yes or no? Will you commit to releasing this unclassified document that alleges that the president of the United States, The president of the United States has taken $5,000,000 or more in bribes from a foreign nation. FBI: The document has already been released Pursuant to a subpoena to the House Oversight Committee Josh Hawley: Has it been released to this committee? FBI: Work with this committee within the parameters that are established Josh Hawley: To me will you release the document to the public? It's unclassified. Don't you think the American people have a right to see it? FBI: Uh, senator, the document, as you know, contains sensitive information That has bearing on the life of the source of the information, potentially.

Reminder That Absolutely Nothing Has Come From The FBI Admitting On The Record A Document Exists Showing Joe Biden Took A $5 Million Dollar Bribe But They Can’t Release The Information Because The Whistleblower Would Be Killed Josh Hawley: You just started to answer Senator Blackburn's question that not releasing the 1023 are talking about as a matter of life and death question of life and death you said. Explain. FBI: It is potentially a question of life or death for whom regard to the source of the information Josh Hawley: So okay. So now we've confirmed that the document exists. That's progress because the FBI director initially denied that it exists. Why did he do that? FBI: We have already and previously acknowledged the existence of the documents. Josh Hawley: Yeah. After you first denied it. Now when a member of this committee read it Right. The FBI let's just get the record straight. The FBI director initially said it doesn't exist. Josh Hawley: —Why don't you just release it? Is it classified? FBI: The document is not classified. Josh Hawley: K. Will you commit to releasing it? FBI: Senator, we'll take that back, and we will work with you and this committee. Josh Hawley: How about just a yes or no? Will you commit to releasing this unclassified document that alleges that the president of the United States, The president of the United States has taken $5,000,000 or more in bribes from a foreign nation. FBI: The document has already been released Pursuant to a subpoena to the House Oversight Committee Josh Hawley: Has it been released to this committee? FBI: Work with this committee within the parameters that are established Josh Hawley: To me will you release the document to the public? It's unclassified. Don't you think the American people have a right to see it? FBI: Uh, senator, the document, as you know, contains sensitive information That has bearing on the life of the source of the information, potentially.

Wall Street Apes

641,415 просмотров • 2 лет назад

For correction sake: This information is FALSE, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu was the first to release a very detailed Manifesto, issues on Student loans which birthed NELFUND Student loan scheme and other policies came from it . As at that time, Peter Obi said clearly that he does NOT need a manifesto (video evidence attached). After much pressure, his team quickly put something together, they later used a picture from Ikoyi/VI as his cover page which was heavily criticized (picture evidence attached), people said he should have used a picture from Anambra which he governed. Please feel free to support your candidate BUT Say No to FAKE NEWS.

For correction sake: This information is FALSE, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu was the first to release a very detailed Manifesto, issues on Student loans which birthed NELFUND Student loan scheme and other policies came from it . As at that time, Peter Obi said clearly that he does NOT need a manifesto (video evidence attached). After much pressure, his team quickly put something together, they later used a picture from Ikoyi/VI as his cover page which was heavily criticized (picture evidence attached), people said he should have used a picture from Anambra which he governed. Please feel free to support your candidate BUT Say No to FAKE NEWS.

Jubril A. Gawat

106,031 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Kash Patel and Todd Blanche spar with rude NBC 'reporter' Ryan Reilly, who interrupts non-stop because he cares more about peddling fake news than hearing Patel's response: Reilly: "Just explain the computer login issue...What did you think after you were unable to log into the system?" Patel: "Let's have a survey. How many of you people believe that's true? Hang on, you asked a question...let me answer it." Reilly: "No, no, lemme...Did you communicate with anyone that you thought you were fired after you were unable to log into the system?" Patel: "Don't cut me off. You asked a question! The problem with you and your baseless reporting is that is an absolute lie. It was never said. It never happened. And I will serve in this administration as long as the President and the Attorney General want me to do so..." Reilly: *interrupting again* Patel: "The simple answer to your question is you are lying." Reilly: "I asked you a direct question." Reilly: "I was never locked out of my systems-...anyone that says the opposite is lying. Thank you." Blanche: "Look, man, stop. You're being EXTRAORDINARILY rude. I know maybe that's part of your profession, but please just stop. If you ask a question, he can answer it and then-...Now you're interrupting me. Just a little bit of respect, man! Just a tiny little bit. Try it sometime."

Kash Patel and Todd Blanche spar with rude NBC 'reporter' Ryan Reilly, who interrupts non-stop because he cares more about peddling fake news than hearing Patel's response: Reilly: "Just explain the computer login issue...What did you think after you were unable to log into the system?" Patel: "Let's have a survey. How many of you people believe that's true? Hang on, you asked a question...let me answer it." Reilly: "No, no, lemme...Did you communicate with anyone that you thought you were fired after you were unable to log into the system?" Patel: "Don't cut me off. You asked a question! The problem with you and your baseless reporting is that is an absolute lie. It was never said. It never happened. And I will serve in this administration as long as the President and the Attorney General want me to do so..." Reilly: interrupting again Patel: "The simple answer to your question is you are lying." Reilly: "I asked you a direct question." Reilly: "I was never locked out of my systems-...anyone that says the opposite is lying. Thank you." Blanche: "Look, man, stop. You're being EXTRAORDINARILY rude. I know maybe that's part of your profession, but please just stop. If you ask a question, he can answer it and then-...Now you're interrupting me. Just a little bit of respect, man! Just a tiny little bit. Try it sometime."

Julia 🇺🇸

474,489 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Here is: The Associate Chair of the Somali American Caucus is issuing threats against anyone from Somalia who discusses Ilhan Omar’s bigamy and her own incestuous relationship with her brother, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi. “As troubling details mounted against Omar, members of the Somali community were threatened into silence through intimidation tactics and physical violence on themselves and their families still back in Somalia. In an obtained Facebook Live video from August 18th, 2016, a woman identified as the Associate Chair of the Somali American Caucus speaks: in translation she states in plain terms that any Somali that talks about Omar's personal life, including marriage discrepancies, is an enemy of the Somali community. Credible sources in the Somali community have stepped forward and provided Alpha News with information in exchange for anonymity, along with members of the 2003 class have also identified Elmi's father as... As Nur Said Elmi Mohammed, the same man who calls himself father to Ilhan Omar.”

Here is: The Associate Chair of the Somali American Caucus is issuing threats against anyone from Somalia who discusses Ilhan Omar’s bigamy and her own incestuous relationship with her brother, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi. “As troubling details mounted against Omar, members of the Somali community were threatened into silence through intimidation tactics and physical violence on themselves and their families still back in Somalia. In an obtained Facebook Live video from August 18th, 2016, a woman identified as the Associate Chair of the Somali American Caucus speaks: in translation she states in plain terms that any Somali that talks about Omar's personal life, including marriage discrepancies, is an enemy of the Somali community. Credible sources in the Somali community have stepped forward and provided Alpha News with information in exchange for anonymity, along with members of the 2003 class have also identified Elmi's father as... As Nur Said Elmi Mohammed, the same man who calls himself father to Ilhan Omar.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

22,754 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Attack on Ambati Rambabu shows complete collapse of law and order: YS Jagan Mohan Reddy Tadepalli, Jan 31: Former Chief Minister and YSR Congress Party president YS Jagan Mohan Reddy has strongly condemned the murder attempt on senior YSRCP leader and former minister Ambati Rambabu, holding Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu directly responsible for the growing violence and lawlessness in the state. Taking to X, YS Jagan Mohan Reddy asked whether attacks and murder attempts have become the answer to anyone who dares to question the failures and conspiracies of the ruling regime. He said Chandrababu’s conspiracy using the Tirumala laddu prasadam had completely collapsed after reports from premier national institutions NDDB and NDRI exposed the falsehoods. Unable to digest the truth coming out, Chandrababu has now resorted to violence through his goons, he alleged. YS Jagan said that instead of apologising for hurting the sentiments of crores of devotees across the country and the world, Chandrababu Naidu is trying to divert attention by encouraging attacks on YSRCP leaders. As part of this strategy, a murder attempt was carried out on Ambati Rambabu, who has been consistently questioning the failures and wrongdoings of the government. He stated that TDP goons attacked Ambati Rambabu with sticks and iron rods, while the police failed miserably to provide protection. He stated that the attack was carried out under the directions of Chandrababu Naidu himself, and that the police behaved as silent spectators, as if they were guarding the attackers instead of stopping them. This is extremely dangerous and alarming, he said. YS Jagan further said that after the lab reports exposed the laddu ghee propaganda, the ruling party resorted to installing defamatory flexis and spreading false campaigns, and also instigated attacks on YSRCP leaders including Bhumana Karunakar Reddy, Vidadala Rajini and Bolla Brahmanayudu. Targeting Ambati Rambabu with a murder attempt clearly reflects Chandrababu Naidu’s authoritarian and violent mindset, he said. He warned that repeated attacks on senior YSRCP leaders show how Andhra Pradesh has turned into a “jungle raj”, where law, justice and constitutional values have no meaning. He demanded immediate intervention by the Governor to stop the deteriorating situation in the state. YS Jagan also demanded strict action against officials responsible for failing to prevent the attacks, including the DGP ( Andhra Pradesh Police ), Guntur DIG and SP. He urged the Centre to provide adequate security to YSRCP leaders and said the party’s MPs will submit a representation to the Union Home Ministry seeking immediate intervention. He concluded by stating that such acts of violence and intimidation pose a serious threat to democracy and cannot be tolerated.

Attack on Ambati Rambabu shows complete collapse of law and order: YS Jagan Mohan Reddy Tadepalli, Jan 31: Former Chief Minister and YSR Congress Party president YS Jagan Mohan Reddy has strongly condemned the murder attempt on senior YSRCP leader and former minister Ambati Rambabu, holding Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu directly responsible for the growing violence and lawlessness in the state. Taking to X, YS Jagan Mohan Reddy asked whether attacks and murder attempts have become the answer to anyone who dares to question the failures and conspiracies of the ruling regime. He said Chandrababu’s conspiracy using the Tirumala laddu prasadam had completely collapsed after reports from premier national institutions NDDB and NDRI exposed the falsehoods. Unable to digest the truth coming out, Chandrababu has now resorted to violence through his goons, he alleged. YS Jagan said that instead of apologising for hurting the sentiments of crores of devotees across the country and the world, Chandrababu Naidu is trying to divert attention by encouraging attacks on YSRCP leaders. As part of this strategy, a murder attempt was carried out on Ambati Rambabu, who has been consistently questioning the failures and wrongdoings of the government. He stated that TDP goons attacked Ambati Rambabu with sticks and iron rods, while the police failed miserably to provide protection. He stated that the attack was carried out under the directions of Chandrababu Naidu himself, and that the police behaved as silent spectators, as if they were guarding the attackers instead of stopping them. This is extremely dangerous and alarming, he said. YS Jagan further said that after the lab reports exposed the laddu ghee propaganda, the ruling party resorted to installing defamatory flexis and spreading false campaigns, and also instigated attacks on YSRCP leaders including Bhumana Karunakar Reddy, Vidadala Rajini and Bolla Brahmanayudu. Targeting Ambati Rambabu with a murder attempt clearly reflects Chandrababu Naidu’s authoritarian and violent mindset, he said. He warned that repeated attacks on senior YSRCP leaders show how Andhra Pradesh has turned into a “jungle raj”, where law, justice and constitutional values have no meaning. He demanded immediate intervention by the Governor to stop the deteriorating situation in the state. YS Jagan also demanded strict action against officials responsible for failing to prevent the attacks, including the DGP ( Andhra Pradesh Police ), Guntur DIG and SP. He urged the Centre to provide adequate security to YSRCP leaders and said the party’s MPs will submit a representation to the Union Home Ministry seeking immediate intervention. He concluded by stating that such acts of violence and intimidation pose a serious threat to democracy and cannot be tolerated.

YSR Congress Party

18,912 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Even though the foreign media certainly has its own shortcomings but the truth is sometimes, when you are looking for a fair, factual and balanced account of events, you have to look for one from them as some sections of the Nigerian media have become so entangled in political narratives and selective storytelling that they conveniently choose what parts of history to highlight and what parts to bury quietly. This is a 2016 BBC report showing how everyday life was returning to Maiduguri, after several years under Boko Haram siege. The report highlighted how normal life was slowly but steadily returning to the capital of Borno State. It captured real people, real progress and the genuine sense of relief that swept through communities. It showed football matches being played again and families reuniting after years of displacement. Sadly, you would struggle to find such positive, evidence-based reporting on some of our local channels, particularly ARISE NEWS, which now seems more interested in erasing or downplaying such positive reports to fit a convenient narrative. Dear Ayo Mairo-Ese, as you boldly say, President Buhari didn’t care and didn’t do anything to push back against terrorism. The attached video from the BBC is for you, for your information and for the sake of truth.

Even though the foreign media certainly has its own shortcomings but the truth is sometimes, when you are looking for a fair, factual and balanced account of events, you have to look for one from them as some sections of the Nigerian media have become so entangled in political narratives and selective storytelling that they conveniently choose what parts of history to highlight and what parts to bury quietly. This is a 2016 BBC report showing how everyday life was returning to Maiduguri, after several years under Boko Haram siege. The report highlighted how normal life was slowly but steadily returning to the capital of Borno State. It captured real people, real progress and the genuine sense of relief that swept through communities. It showed football matches being played again and families reuniting after years of displacement. Sadly, you would struggle to find such positive, evidence-based reporting on some of our local channels, particularly ARISE NEWS, which now seems more interested in erasing or downplaying such positive reports to fit a convenient narrative. Dear Ayo Mairo-Ese, as you boldly say, President Buhari didn’t care and didn’t do anything to push back against terrorism. The attached video from the BBC is for you, for your information and for the sake of truth.

Bashir Ahmad, OON

52,884 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Calvary Greetings Reno Omokri Reno Omokri Please read everything I have typed SLOWLY, so that you can understand. It is quite appalling that once again you will wake up very early in the morning to state lies about Peter Obi like he is the God you pray to. Your entire tweet is filled with lies and a sad cry for help of an online town crier of FAKE NEWS. I will address your claims sentence by sentence with ACTUAL FACTS. First of, you said “Peter should have learnt from the effect his presence had at the AFCON final match when we lost to Ivory Coast.” A gigantic lie Reno, Peter Obi was not at the AFCON final. Infact, Nigeria won all their matches Peter obi attended and the only one he didn’t attend was the final game against Ivory Coast, and that was the one Nigeria lost. But guess who was present in the game, your APC paymasters, Shettima and his likes. So, by your own logic, Peter Obi’s absence and the presence of your paymasters was the real problem. So, if Peter Obi had attended, and your rigged in Shettima had gone to serve ice cream in Borno, we would have won. You claimed in your tweet that Peter Obi made an effort to make his presence known and felt. LOL This is actually a compliment. The fans made their love for him known. Unlike your failed APC politicians who needed announcers to introduce them, Peter Obi’s name echoed naturally throughout the stadium. The people made him “felt.” It is called LOVE, something nobody has ever shown you before in your entire life, not even the woman you married. You are angry that PO gave an impromptu interview for appearance. Correction: Peter Obi was already outside the stadium, in front of the doors and the parked cars, when the media pleaded with him for an interview, and as the loving person he is, he obliged. That’s called humility, something you and your political paymasters wouldn’t understand. You also claim that the match “is about Nigeria, not him.” But yet, you and your likes have spent your entire time talking about him than the match itself. Or the fact that your govt have destroyed Sports in Nigeria. Your tweet and the rest of your kind is just a FAILED cheap attempt at blackmail to try to exonerate the failed govt from their role in destroying Sports in Nigeria and not investing in the Super Eagles team. You claim “Politics and football do not mix. The players needed to be focused on the game.” Then why were APC governors and Ministers present? Why was the stadium announcer calling out their names continuously? If Peter Obi’s presence was a distraction, then what about the multiple failed APC figures who were struggling for relevance in the same stadium, using security to push the fans all around the stadium? Be consistent. I will agree with you that “Politicians drain morale.” Yes, APC politicians drain morale. Because the evil they have done to Nigerians is too much. WE DO NOT WANT TO SEE YOUR FACES. That is why we recognize ONLY Peter Obi. Infact, right after Peter Obi entered the stadium, the Super Eagles scored. The actual moment of low morale came when APC figures like Sanwo Olu and your ministers were being announced, and that was the moment Zimbabwe equalized. Because their corrupt names distracted our players. That should tell you where the real bad luck is. History has shown that Nigeria played a wining game in every match Peter Obi attended, except for the final, which he DID NOT attend. So, if we are playing the superstition game, then the real bad luck is with those who attended the final like your Shettima. Reno, you and your ventriloquist paymasters are only upset because Peter Obi’s presence in Uyo once again proved that the people’s love cannot be bought. The fact that his name naturally resonated in the stadium while APC figures were ignored hurts you all. The main discussion is: APC destroyed sports in Nigeria. Don’t use propaganda to try to cover it up. A New Nigeria is POssible And no amount of your propaganda will change that.

Calvary Greetings Reno Omokri Reno Omokri Please read everything I have typed SLOWLY, so that you can understand. It is quite appalling that once again you will wake up very early in the morning to state lies about Peter Obi like he is the God you pray to. Your entire tweet is filled with lies and a sad cry for help of an online town crier of FAKE NEWS. I will address your claims sentence by sentence with ACTUAL FACTS. First of, you said “Peter should have learnt from the effect his presence had at the AFCON final match when we lost to Ivory Coast.” A gigantic lie Reno, Peter Obi was not at the AFCON final. Infact, Nigeria won all their matches Peter obi attended and the only one he didn’t attend was the final game against Ivory Coast, and that was the one Nigeria lost. But guess who was present in the game, your APC paymasters, Shettima and his likes. So, by your own logic, Peter Obi’s absence and the presence of your paymasters was the real problem. So, if Peter Obi had attended, and your rigged in Shettima had gone to serve ice cream in Borno, we would have won. You claimed in your tweet that Peter Obi made an effort to make his presence known and felt. LOL This is actually a compliment. The fans made their love for him known. Unlike your failed APC politicians who needed announcers to introduce them, Peter Obi’s name echoed naturally throughout the stadium. The people made him “felt.” It is called LOVE, something nobody has ever shown you before in your entire life, not even the woman you married. You are angry that PO gave an impromptu interview for appearance. Correction: Peter Obi was already outside the stadium, in front of the doors and the parked cars, when the media pleaded with him for an interview, and as the loving person he is, he obliged. That’s called humility, something you and your political paymasters wouldn’t understand. You also claim that the match “is about Nigeria, not him.” But yet, you and your likes have spent your entire time talking about him than the match itself. Or the fact that your govt have destroyed Sports in Nigeria. Your tweet and the rest of your kind is just a FAILED cheap attempt at blackmail to try to exonerate the failed govt from their role in destroying Sports in Nigeria and not investing in the Super Eagles team. You claim “Politics and football do not mix. The players needed to be focused on the game.” Then why were APC governors and Ministers present? Why was the stadium announcer calling out their names continuously? If Peter Obi’s presence was a distraction, then what about the multiple failed APC figures who were struggling for relevance in the same stadium, using security to push the fans all around the stadium? Be consistent. I will agree with you that “Politicians drain morale.” Yes, APC politicians drain morale. Because the evil they have done to Nigerians is too much. WE DO NOT WANT TO SEE YOUR FACES. That is why we recognize ONLY Peter Obi. Infact, right after Peter Obi entered the stadium, the Super Eagles scored. The actual moment of low morale came when APC figures like Sanwo Olu and your ministers were being announced, and that was the moment Zimbabwe equalized. Because their corrupt names distracted our players. That should tell you where the real bad luck is. History has shown that Nigeria played a wining game in every match Peter Obi attended, except for the final, which he DID NOT attend. So, if we are playing the superstition game, then the real bad luck is with those who attended the final like your Shettima. Reno, you and your ventriloquist paymasters are only upset because Peter Obi’s presence in Uyo once again proved that the people’s love cannot be bought. The fact that his name naturally resonated in the stadium while APC figures were ignored hurts you all. The main discussion is: APC destroyed sports in Nigeria. Don’t use propaganda to try to cover it up. A New Nigeria is POssible And no amount of your propaganda will change that.

AMB. SERAH IBRAHIM

280,165 просмотров • 1 год назад

.Jason Rantz on Seattle Red calmly points out what was missing from the coverage of DNI Tulsi Gabbard's Senate testimony and masterfully explains the Trump administration's rationale for after Iran... "We're in a world of fact. I think Andrew McCabe's characterization of her answer goes very far from what she actually said. The question of whether or not something is imminent to the point where you're going to order military strikes is separate, and is the decision -- the sole decision maker there is the President. It's based on the intelligence that they're getting. And Tulsi Gabbard's point was we present the probabilities of what is a potential threat, and the President gets to decide with counsel whether or not he believes that it qualifies as imminent. To the point of what imminent means, it's not the same as what we all use this term. It started with the Bush doctrine. It expanded greatly under Obama, and they're basically arguing three main points, I think, for what imminent threat actually can be in this role: whether or not you have a window of opportunity -- and they had, obviously, a window of opportunity in this case, most of the people in Iran are no longer alive, the ability to go after someone who is in fact, or an organization or regime is a potential threat. Do they have the capabilities to threaten us? And the argument from the beginning wasn't solely about tomorrow, they can have nuclear capabilities. It was whether or not they were going to have the ballistic missile coverage to ensure that they can, in fact, cover their nuclear capability."

.Jason Rantz on Seattle Red calmly points out what was missing from the coverage of DNI Tulsi Gabbard's Senate testimony and masterfully explains the Trump administration's rationale for after Iran... "We're in a world of fact. I think Andrew McCabe's characterization of her answer goes very far from what she actually said. The question of whether or not something is imminent to the point where you're going to order military strikes is separate, and is the decision -- the sole decision maker there is the President. It's based on the intelligence that they're getting. And Tulsi Gabbard's point was we present the probabilities of what is a potential threat, and the President gets to decide with counsel whether or not he believes that it qualifies as imminent. To the point of what imminent means, it's not the same as what we all use this term. It started with the Bush doctrine. It expanded greatly under Obama, and they're basically arguing three main points, I think, for what imminent threat actually can be in this role: whether or not you have a window of opportunity -- and they had, obviously, a window of opportunity in this case, most of the people in Iran are no longer alive, the ability to go after someone who is in fact, or an organization or regime is a potential threat. Do they have the capabilities to threaten us? And the argument from the beginning wasn't solely about tomorrow, they can have nuclear capabilities. It was whether or not they were going to have the ballistic missile coverage to ensure that they can, in fact, cover their nuclear capability."

Curtis Houck

16,657 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

EXCLUSIVE: CBC, CTV lied about police response to Leaders' Debate chaos, records show Officials confirmed they have no records of any involvement whatsoever. No calls, no messages, no officers. The federal leaders’ debates in 2025 were supposed to showcase Canadian democracy. Instead, they exposed collusion between Canada’s state broadcaster and the taxpayer-funded commission meant to referee them. Rebel News had twice beaten the Leaders’ Debates Commission in federal court after being unlawfully barred from covering the debates. By 2025, facing the prospect of losing a third time, the commission capitulated and accredited Rebel News. That legal victory enraged the legacy media, particularly the CBC, as Rebel News reporters were heckled in the press line, disparaged on national television, and ultimately shut out of the post-debate scrum when the commission cancelled the second night's scrum entirely rather than allow questions from independent media. I know, I was in the room, subject to this vile workplace harassment for two days straight. I guess we were too good at our jobs on the first night, after upstaging the entitled bullies in the mainstream media. The message was clear: independent journalists were such a disruption that police had to be called in. Again, look at this footage from inside the media room. Who are the aggressors? But now a Rebel News freedom of information request to the Montreal police service (SPVM) exposed the lie. Officials confirmed they have no records of any involvement whatsoever. No calls, no messages, no officers. Security inside the debate venue was handled by the RCMP — not SPVM, and certainly not because of Rebel News. It's a Pattern of Dishonesty This wasn’t a one-off mistake. CBC’s own ombudsman admitted in April that the 2025 election set a record for complaints — more than the previous three months combined — with the leaders’ debates at the centre of viewer outrage. Why? Because CBC lied there too. They claimed Rebel News’ billboard truck was breaking the law. It wasn’t. They claimed our journalists disrupted the debates. We didn’t. They claimed accreditation was revoked. It wasn’t. And Rosemary Barton falsely told Canadians that “remains of Indigenous children have been found” — a statement later quietly “corrected” online to acknowledge only “potential burial sites.” The ombudsman admitted “many complaints were found to have merit.” Translation: viewers caught the CBC lying, and the network had to concede it. More Manufactured Victims and Manufactured Stories The debates were supposed to be about Canadians hearing directly from their leaders. Instead, they became about legacy media protecting their turf. CBC and CTV weren’t content to report facts. They positioned themselves as victims, smeared independents as aggressors, and even invented a police presence to make their storyline stick. The access to information documents and the ombudsman’s report prove this wasn’t a mistake — it was a pattern. With Prime Minister Mark Carney pledging another $150 million to the CBC on top of its $1.4 billion subsidy, Canadians should expect more of the same: a state broadcaster that manufactures narratives, not news. These liars should apologize. Instead, they will be rewarded with more of your money to lie to you some more.

EXCLUSIVE: CBC, CTV lied about police response to Leaders' Debate chaos, records show Officials confirmed they have no records of any involvement whatsoever. No calls, no messages, no officers. The federal leaders’ debates in 2025 were supposed to showcase Canadian democracy. Instead, they exposed collusion between Canada’s state broadcaster and the taxpayer-funded commission meant to referee them. Rebel News had twice beaten the Leaders’ Debates Commission in federal court after being unlawfully barred from covering the debates. By 2025, facing the prospect of losing a third time, the commission capitulated and accredited Rebel News. That legal victory enraged the legacy media, particularly the CBC, as Rebel News reporters were heckled in the press line, disparaged on national television, and ultimately shut out of the post-debate scrum when the commission cancelled the second night's scrum entirely rather than allow questions from independent media. I know, I was in the room, subject to this vile workplace harassment for two days straight. I guess we were too good at our jobs on the first night, after upstaging the entitled bullies in the mainstream media. The message was clear: independent journalists were such a disruption that police had to be called in. Again, look at this footage from inside the media room. Who are the aggressors? But now a Rebel News freedom of information request to the Montreal police service (SPVM) exposed the lie. Officials confirmed they have no records of any involvement whatsoever. No calls, no messages, no officers. Security inside the debate venue was handled by the RCMP — not SPVM, and certainly not because of Rebel News. It's a Pattern of Dishonesty This wasn’t a one-off mistake. CBC’s own ombudsman admitted in April that the 2025 election set a record for complaints — more than the previous three months combined — with the leaders’ debates at the centre of viewer outrage. Why? Because CBC lied there too. They claimed Rebel News’ billboard truck was breaking the law. It wasn’t. They claimed our journalists disrupted the debates. We didn’t. They claimed accreditation was revoked. It wasn’t. And Rosemary Barton falsely told Canadians that “remains of Indigenous children have been found” — a statement later quietly “corrected” online to acknowledge only “potential burial sites.” The ombudsman admitted “many complaints were found to have merit.” Translation: viewers caught the CBC lying, and the network had to concede it. More Manufactured Victims and Manufactured Stories The debates were supposed to be about Canadians hearing directly from their leaders. Instead, they became about legacy media protecting their turf. CBC and CTV weren’t content to report facts. They positioned themselves as victims, smeared independents as aggressors, and even invented a police presence to make their storyline stick. The access to information documents and the ombudsman’s report prove this wasn’t a mistake — it was a pattern. With Prime Minister Mark Carney pledging another $150 million to the CBC on top of its $1.4 billion subsidy, Canadians should expect more of the same: a state broadcaster that manufactures narratives, not news. These liars should apologize. Instead, they will be rewarded with more of your money to lie to you some more.

Rebel News

32,407 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

With the Russia hoax being exposed more every single day, there is another hoax making its rounds again. Hoax: In 2018 Putin said that he directed his people to help Trump win the election. A short, out of context clip is now their "proof" of Russian election interference to help Trump in 2016. Brennan talked about it. Peter Baker posted about it a couple days ago. Bill Maher played it on his show last night, claiming it was proof of Russian interference to help Trump. It's all over MSNBC and CNN again. They probably all know the truth about the clip but it doesn't stop them from lying about it. Firstly, it should come as no surprise that CNN's clip is different from almost all of the others broadcasted, as you will shortly see. Top clip is the hoax: Putin is asked if he wanted Trump to win and then asked if he directed his officials to help him. Putin answers "yes I did." Here's what actually happened. Putin had just stated that he in no way directed anyone to interfere in the election, that there was no collusion, and that it was all ridiculous nonsense. Putin called the accusations garbage more than once in the press conference. Putin was then asked by a reporter why people should believe his denials about election interference and if he would hand over the 12 people Mueller indicted (show indictments btw). Putin took out his translator ear piece and gave a long answer about working with Trump to find out if crimes were committed, America and Russia working together on other stuff, treaties, etc. During that answer (bottom clip) he again said the accusations of interference were not true. At the end of his answer, the same reporter who asked him the previous questions asked "Did you want Trump to win and did you instruct officials to help him." By watching any other broadcast than CNN, it becomes very clear what happened. Putin did not hear the first half of the reporter's followup question because he was putting on an ear piece and the volume of the reporter's mic was down. Watch the top clip and the last 20 seconds of the bottom clip. Look at the difference. You will see it is obvious that Putin did not hear the first question and only heard the second question about if he instructed people to help Trump. It's obvious that he thought it applied to what he was just talking about, which was America and Russia working together. It's so funny how in the foreign broadcasts and some of the American ones, it's clear that Putin didn't hear the first half of the question. But on CNN the volume is magically up and it appears that Putin heard both questions. But the fact is that Putin had just spent most of the press conference denying any interference in the election or collusion with Trump. He wasn't all of a sudden admitting it now. He didn't hear the first question. The hoaxers never play any of the rest of the press conference with all the denials. In another press conference after this one Putin again says it was all a hoax cooked up to undermine Trump's presidency. If the MSM cared at all about America or the truth they would lay out what I just did. If you don't want to watch all the context, just watch the top clip, the beginning of the bottom clip, and the last 20 seconds of the bottom clip and you will see clearly what happened.

With the Russia hoax being exposed more every single day, there is another hoax making its rounds again. Hoax: In 2018 Putin said that he directed his people to help Trump win the election. A short, out of context clip is now their "proof" of Russian election interference to help Trump in 2016. Brennan talked about it. Peter Baker posted about it a couple days ago. Bill Maher played it on his show last night, claiming it was proof of Russian interference to help Trump. It's all over MSNBC and CNN again. They probably all know the truth about the clip but it doesn't stop them from lying about it. Firstly, it should come as no surprise that CNN's clip is different from almost all of the others broadcasted, as you will shortly see. Top clip is the hoax: Putin is asked if he wanted Trump to win and then asked if he directed his officials to help him. Putin answers "yes I did." Here's what actually happened. Putin had just stated that he in no way directed anyone to interfere in the election, that there was no collusion, and that it was all ridiculous nonsense. Putin called the accusations garbage more than once in the press conference. Putin was then asked by a reporter why people should believe his denials about election interference and if he would hand over the 12 people Mueller indicted (show indictments btw). Putin took out his translator ear piece and gave a long answer about working with Trump to find out if crimes were committed, America and Russia working together on other stuff, treaties, etc. During that answer (bottom clip) he again said the accusations of interference were not true. At the end of his answer, the same reporter who asked him the previous questions asked "Did you want Trump to win and did you instruct officials to help him." By watching any other broadcast than CNN, it becomes very clear what happened. Putin did not hear the first half of the reporter's followup question because he was putting on an ear piece and the volume of the reporter's mic was down. Watch the top clip and the last 20 seconds of the bottom clip. Look at the difference. You will see it is obvious that Putin did not hear the first question and only heard the second question about if he instructed people to help Trump. It's obvious that he thought it applied to what he was just talking about, which was America and Russia working together. It's so funny how in the foreign broadcasts and some of the American ones, it's clear that Putin didn't hear the first half of the question. But on CNN the volume is magically up and it appears that Putin heard both questions. But the fact is that Putin had just spent most of the press conference denying any interference in the election or collusion with Trump. He wasn't all of a sudden admitting it now. He didn't hear the first question. The hoaxers never play any of the rest of the press conference with all the denials. In another press conference after this one Putin again says it was all a hoax cooked up to undermine Trump's presidency. If the MSM cared at all about America or the truth they would lay out what I just did. If you don't want to watch all the context, just watch the top clip, the beginning of the bottom clip, and the last 20 seconds of the bottom clip and you will see clearly what happened.

MAZE

58,564 просмотров • 1 год назад

Here are the Facts I can find I can find about Joe Ellis who is allegedly the Pilot of the Blackhawk Let me start by saying there are some outstanding citizen journalists out there. But some people jump to conclusions for clicks. Be careful. First, there is no official confirmation that Chief Warrant Officer 2 (CW2) Joe Ellis was the pilot or even in the Blackhawk. He could have been the co-pilot or the trainee pilot also if onboard. - A post on Facebook from Jo Ellis's account, After The Crash, claims they were not involved in the crash. - Anyone could have access to that account. A lot that is not known yet. Don't jump to conclusions. - Let's slow down. Everything is being investigated it will take some time for information to come out. - Part of what makes researching this tough. 1) the investigation is still ongoing. 2) The Feds have a long history of not releasing, slow walking, or blatantly hiding information if it goes against DEI. - Corporate Media and fake News, are active participants more than happy to help the Democrats push propaganda - Jo Ellis is a biological male who transitioned to trans while in the military. - Jo Ellis who was interviewed by Michael Smerconish. I posted a clip, credit to I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 In it he claims that he is nervous about Trump's policies - Joe Ellis has made many Anti Trump posts and written Anti Trump articles adding fuel to the fire. Again let's slow down a bit. The facts will come out There is a multibillion-dollar media machine that wants to de-legitimize citizen journalists (as much as I hate the "J" word) The easiest way to do that is for people to rush to conclusions and then be proven wrong later. Slow down, we are the News now.

Here are the Facts I can find I can find about Joe Ellis who is allegedly the Pilot of the Blackhawk Let me start by saying there are some outstanding citizen journalists out there. But some people jump to conclusions for clicks. Be careful. First, there is no official confirmation that Chief Warrant Officer 2 (CW2) Joe Ellis was the pilot or even in the Blackhawk. He could have been the co-pilot or the trainee pilot also if onboard. - A post on Facebook from Jo Ellis's account, After The Crash, claims they were not involved in the crash. - Anyone could have access to that account. A lot that is not known yet. Don't jump to conclusions. - Let's slow down. Everything is being investigated it will take some time for information to come out. - Part of what makes researching this tough. 1) the investigation is still ongoing. 2) The Feds have a long history of not releasing, slow walking, or blatantly hiding information if it goes against DEI. - Corporate Media and fake News, are active participants more than happy to help the Democrats push propaganda - Jo Ellis is a biological male who transitioned to trans while in the military. - Jo Ellis who was interviewed by Michael Smerconish. I posted a clip, credit to I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 In it he claims that he is nervous about Trump's policies - Joe Ellis has made many Anti Trump posts and written Anti Trump articles adding fuel to the fire. Again let's slow down a bit. The facts will come out There is a multibillion-dollar media machine that wants to de-legitimize citizen journalists (as much as I hate the "J" word) The easiest way to do that is for people to rush to conclusions and then be proven wrong later. Slow down, we are the News now.

Cash Loren

18,546 просмотров • 1 год назад

In the House yesterday, Poilievre asked a number of valid questions of the Prime Minister that the press seems to have ignored. Despite being in Ottawa, the Prime Minister skipped Question Period "For all the Prime Minister's negotiating skills and State's craft, what really do we have to show a year after?" - "What do we really know about the Prime Minister's plan to get tariffs lifted with the U.S. what really do we know?" "Is it still his negotiating bottom line to have those tariffs removed? And if so, what is he planning to offer in exchange for getting them lifted? We don't know." - "If he does intend to renew CUSMA, does he intend to try and get it renewed exactly as it is, with small changes or a complete overhaul? "Has anybody heard him answer that question?" "When was the last serious negotiation?" "Has he or anyone in his cabinet actually been at the negotiating table in the last four months?" - "On the one hand, he says that the reason we have the only shrinking economy in the G7 is because the tariffs are so bad." "On the other, he says there's no need to rush into solving this problem because the deal is so good." - "Mr. Speaker, we all have to ask, how long will this Prime Minister use the trade dispute and other foreign matters as a convenient all purpose excuse for causing inflation, debt and joblessness here at home." Pierre Poilievre

In the House yesterday, Poilievre asked a number of valid questions of the Prime Minister that the press seems to have ignored. Despite being in Ottawa, the Prime Minister skipped Question Period "For all the Prime Minister's negotiating skills and State's craft, what really do we have to show a year after?" - "What do we really know about the Prime Minister's plan to get tariffs lifted with the U.S. what really do we know?" "Is it still his negotiating bottom line to have those tariffs removed? And if so, what is he planning to offer in exchange for getting them lifted? We don't know." - "If he does intend to renew CUSMA, does he intend to try and get it renewed exactly as it is, with small changes or a complete overhaul? "Has anybody heard him answer that question?" "When was the last serious negotiation?" "Has he or anyone in his cabinet actually been at the negotiating table in the last four months?" - "On the one hand, he says that the reason we have the only shrinking economy in the G7 is because the tariffs are so bad." "On the other, he says there's no need to rush into solving this problem because the deal is so good." - "Mr. Speaker, we all have to ask, how long will this Prime Minister use the trade dispute and other foreign matters as a convenient all purpose excuse for causing inflation, debt and joblessness here at home." Pierre Poilievre

cbcwatcher

33,131 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

.Tucker Carlson Drops Stunning Monologue: "Everything [They've] Told You About the War in Ukraine Is a Lie" "Pretty much everything that NBC News and the New York Times have told you about the war in Ukraine is a lie." "'The Russian army is incompetent,' they claim. 'Ukraine is a democracy.' 'Vladimir Putin is Hitler, and he's trying to take over the world.' Thankfully, the Ukrainians are winning. None of that is true. "Every claim is false. The last one, especially. The Ukrainian Army is not winning. In fact, it's losing badly. Ukraine is being destroyed. Its population is being slaughtered in lopsided battles with a technologically superior enemy or scattered by the millions to the rest of the globe as refugees. Ukraine is running out of soldiers. "As that happens, the question will inevitably arise who's going to replace them? If the Ukrainians can't beat Putin, who will? The answer, of course, will be us. American troops will fight the Russian army in Eastern Europe. That's most likely. And the assumption is we'll win. But will we win? Probably not, says former Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor, a decorated combat veteran who advised the Secretary of Defense in the last administration. The US, says Macgregor, is on the brink of a catastrophic war that could very easily destroy us. Few Americans seem to understand that, but they should."

.Tucker Carlson Drops Stunning Monologue: "Everything [They've] Told You About the War in Ukraine Is a Lie" "Pretty much everything that NBC News and the New York Times have told you about the war in Ukraine is a lie." "'The Russian army is incompetent,' they claim. 'Ukraine is a democracy.' 'Vladimir Putin is Hitler, and he's trying to take over the world.' Thankfully, the Ukrainians are winning. None of that is true. "Every claim is false. The last one, especially. The Ukrainian Army is not winning. In fact, it's losing badly. Ukraine is being destroyed. Its population is being slaughtered in lopsided battles with a technologically superior enemy or scattered by the millions to the rest of the globe as refugees. Ukraine is running out of soldiers. "As that happens, the question will inevitably arise who's going to replace them? If the Ukrainians can't beat Putin, who will? The answer, of course, will be us. American troops will fight the Russian army in Eastern Europe. That's most likely. And the assumption is we'll win. But will we win? Probably not, says former Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor, a decorated combat veteran who advised the Secretary of Defense in the last administration. The US, says Macgregor, is on the brink of a catastrophic war that could very easily destroy us. Few Americans seem to understand that, but they should."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,555,393 просмотров • 3 лет назад

This is how ICE/Border Patrol retaliates when U.S. citizens dare to question them. A woman is sitting in her car in her own neighborhood. An ICE/Border Patrol agent comes to her window. She calmly asks a basic question, “What are you doing in my neighborhood?” His response, “I can do whatever I need to do.” She says, “No, you don’t. Record this” And that’s when it happens. The moment she tells someone to record, the agent turns to his coworkers and says, “Guys, let’s find out their status.” Let that sink in. No suspicion. No probable cause. No crime. Just punishment for speaking up. She says, “Be my guest,” and identifies them out loud, “Everyone, this is ICE.” Now the agent comes back, demanding, “What is your legal status?” She refuses. Correctly. Calmly. Repeatedly. “I don’t have to answer that.” He insists anyway. He starts to say, “I have…” then stops himself. Because he knows he doesn’t have anything. No warrant. No authority. No legal basis. This is intimidation. This is retaliation. This is ICE using the threat of detention as a weapon against civilians who observe them, film them, or question them. When she tells him he should be ashamed, he deflects with the same tired propaganda, “Oh, for all the sex offenders we’ve arrested.” She challenges him, “Show me one. Show me one you have arrested.” And suddenly, he walks away. Because this was never about public safety. It was about silencing her. ICE does this over and over again, If you film them, they threaten you. If you ask questions, they demand your “status.” If you assert your rights, they escalate. This is not law enforcement. This is a federal agency punishing people for exercising their constitutional rights. Film them. Know your rights. That’s the part that scares them most.

This is how ICE/Border Patrol retaliates when U.S. citizens dare to question them. A woman is sitting in her car in her own neighborhood. An ICE/Border Patrol agent comes to her window. She calmly asks a basic question, “What are you doing in my neighborhood?” His response, “I can do whatever I need to do.” She says, “No, you don’t. Record this” And that’s when it happens. The moment she tells someone to record, the agent turns to his coworkers and says, “Guys, let’s find out their status.” Let that sink in. No suspicion. No probable cause. No crime. Just punishment for speaking up. She says, “Be my guest,” and identifies them out loud, “Everyone, this is ICE.” Now the agent comes back, demanding, “What is your legal status?” She refuses. Correctly. Calmly. Repeatedly. “I don’t have to answer that.” He insists anyway. He starts to say, “I have…” then stops himself. Because he knows he doesn’t have anything. No warrant. No authority. No legal basis. This is intimidation. This is retaliation. This is ICE using the threat of detention as a weapon against civilians who observe them, film them, or question them. When she tells him he should be ashamed, he deflects with the same tired propaganda, “Oh, for all the sex offenders we’ve arrested.” She challenges him, “Show me one. Show me one you have arrested.” And suddenly, he walks away. Because this was never about public safety. It was about silencing her. ICE does this over and over again, If you film them, they threaten you. If you ask questions, they demand your “status.” If you assert your rights, they escalate. This is not law enforcement. This is a federal agency punishing people for exercising their constitutional rights. Film them. Know your rights. That’s the part that scares them most.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,122,316 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад