Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

After reaching AI-native terminal velocity we are swamped in code review. The core insight is that as long as you can write code in parallel you will continue to be stuck until you can review it in parallel. I was surprised by how quickly this became my daily driver... show more

Evan Boyle

8,752 subscribers

23,986 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

👀 Ever want a second set of eyes on your code? GitHub Copilot code review can help! Available in preview, Copilot code review offers fast, AI-powered feedback on your code as you write it. You can quickly apply any feedback that Copilot suggests, directly in the editor.

👀 Ever want a second set of eyes on your code? GitHub Copilot code review can help! Available in preview, Copilot code review offers fast, AI-powered feedback on your code as you write it. You can quickly apply any feedback that Copilot suggests, directly in the editor.

Visual Studio Code

75,224 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Today we're launching REVIEW.FAST, speeding up human review of AI generated code 3X. AI changed the world, sped up writing code, but shifted the bottleneck to review. If you can speed up code review, you can ship more. It's as simple as that.

Today we're launching REVIEW.FAST, speeding up human review of AI generated code 3X. AI changed the world, sped up writing code, but shifted the bottleneck to review. If you can speed up code review, you can ship more. It's as simple as that.

Louis Knight-Webb

46,339 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

GitHub Copilot can review your code and generate tests for you in VS Code, and you can customize how it does this magic with targeted Custom Instructions...

GitHub Copilot can review your code and generate tests for you in VS Code, and you can customize how it does this magic with targeted Custom Instructions...

Visual Studio Code

82,442 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Nobody is writing 90% of their code using AI. Here's the uncomfortable truth: The real productivity gain from using AI to write code is closer to 10%, nowhere near the 90% people claim. Sundar Pichai said in 2024 that 30% of the new code at Google was AI-generated. However, he went on to admit, during Lex Friedman's podcast, that engineering velocity had only increased by about 10%. AI-generated code isn't free code. It still has to be reviewed, tested, and made production-ready. Optimizing a single step (code generation) doesn't boost output if bottlenecks shift elsewhere (code reviews). It doesn't matter how much code you generate if you can't keep up the review process. The solution: Automate as much as you can the review and verification of your code. I'm working with Sonar, who is sponsoring this post, and they will take care of the code quality and security analysis of your code: • They review over 300B lines of code every single day • They cover reliability, security, and maintainability for your code • You can integrate them into your CI/CD pipeline • You can install them in your IDE (I use their VSCode extension) • Support for more than 30 languages Here is a link so you can check them out:

Nobody is writing 90% of their code using AI. Here's the uncomfortable truth: The real productivity gain from using AI to write code is closer to 10%, nowhere near the 90% people claim. Sundar Pichai said in 2024 that 30% of the new code at Google was AI-generated. However, he went on to admit, during Lex Friedman's podcast, that engineering velocity had only increased by about 10%. AI-generated code isn't free code. It still has to be reviewed, tested, and made production-ready. Optimizing a single step (code generation) doesn't boost output if bottlenecks shift elsewhere (code reviews). It doesn't matter how much code you generate if you can't keep up the review process. The solution: Automate as much as you can the review and verification of your code. I'm working with Sonar, who is sponsoring this post, and they will take care of the code quality and security analysis of your code: • They review over 300B lines of code every single day • They cover reliability, security, and maintainability for your code • You can integrate them into your CI/CD pipeline • You can install them in your IDE (I use their VSCode extension) • Support for more than 30 languages Here is a link so you can check them out:

Santiago

296,637 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

LeetCode is dead. Developers don't write code line-by-line anymore. They orchestrate AI agents working in parallel, review AI-generated code, and make architectural decisions. That's the job now. But most interview processes haven't caught up. They still test algorithm memorization instead of AI fluency, code review, and judgment. We're building assessments for next-gen hiring that mirror how developers actually work. Here's how we think about it:

LeetCode is dead. Developers don't write code line-by-line anymore. They orchestrate AI agents working in parallel, review AI-generated code, and make architectural decisions. That's the job now. But most interview processes haven't caught up. They still test algorithm memorization instead of AI fluency, code review, and judgment. We're building assessments for next-gen hiring that mirror how developers actually work. Here's how we think about it:

HackerRank

344,255 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

This is pretty neat. You can write code with Cline, review it with CodeRabbit, and then handover the review context right back into Cline. (all in the same task)

This is pretty neat. You can write code with Cline, review it with CodeRabbit, and then handover the review context right back into Cline. (all in the same task)

Cline

23,011 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Claude Code tip: create an agent that specialises in code review and security. Then add a new memory entry with a nickname for it so you can call it anytime. My code review and security agent is called Big Tony.

Claude Code tip: create an agent that specialises in code review and security. Then add a new memory entry with a nickname for it so you can call it anytime. My code review and security agent is called Big Tony.

Richie

135,574 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

How as a non-technical person you can review the code your AI writes for you (Actual prompts below from Zevi Arnovitz)

How as a non-technical person you can review the code your AI writes for you (Actual prompts below from Zevi Arnovitz)

Lenny Rachitsky

23,301 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."

Patrick OShaughnessy

24,818 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Reminder: You can use Codex code review as part of your ChatGPT subscription 🙂 1. Head to 2. Connect your GitHub 3. Enable code review 4. Choose between review all PRs, just yours or trigger explicitly with "Codex magazine review this" To not spam you Codex will respond with 👍 unless it finds high priority items. You can use AGENTS.md to shape what a high priority item is.

Reminder: You can use Codex code review as part of your ChatGPT subscription 🙂 1. Head to 2. Connect your GitHub 3. Enable code review 4. Choose between review all PRs, just yours or trigger explicitly with "Codex magazine review this" To not spam you Codex will respond with 👍 unless it finds high priority items. You can use AGENTS.md to shape what a high priority item is.

dominik kundel

89,178 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

AI can write more code than any team can review by hand, and a pull request can look fine while hiding a security issue or missing a requirement. In our new short course, AI Code Review, built in collaboration with Qodo and taught by Nnenna 👩🏽‍💻✨, you'll learn the practices that make AI code review effective: review before you open a pull request, give the reviewer full context about your codebase, and triage findings by risk. Then you'll build your own review agent, from a context engine that finds the right code to a team of specialized reviewers. Enroll for free:

AI can write more code than any team can review by hand, and a pull request can look fine while hiding a security issue or missing a requirement. In our new short course, AI Code Review, built in collaboration with Qodo and taught by Nnenna 👩🏽‍💻✨, you'll learn the practices that make AI code review effective: review before you open a pull request, give the reviewer full context about your codebase, and triage findings by risk. Then you'll build your own review agent, from a context engine that finds the right code to a team of specialized reviewers. Enroll for free:

DeepLearning.AI

56,045 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Let's face it: AI can check your code 100x faster and catch 10x more issues than you can. "Code reviews" as a widespread practice is not coming back. There are only two reasons we should consider code reviews today: 1. To transfer knowledge within a team. 2. To ensure AI didn't miss critical aspects in the code. We are getting closer to a point where manually reviewing code will be as relevant as punching holes in a punch card. Here is one idea for you:

Let's face it: AI can check your code 100x faster and catch 10x more issues than you can. "Code reviews" as a widespread practice is not coming back. There are only two reasons we should consider code reviews today: 1. To transfer knowledge within a team. 2. To ensure AI didn't miss critical aspects in the code. We are getting closer to a point where manually reviewing code will be as relevant as punching holes in a punch card. Here is one idea for you:

Santiago

48,783 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

How to write a systematic literature review in 1 hour? A systematic literature review takes 4-6 months. You can reduce this time. 🎯 Here is how you can write it in 1 hour. 1️⃣ Go to 2️⃣ Select Gatsbi reviewer from the drop-down menu 3️⃣ Enter the topic of your literature review 4️⃣ Gatsbi AI will generate an outline for review 5️⃣ If you are OK with it, click on write manuscript. 6️⃣ Gatsbi will write the literature review for you. 👉 The literature review contains the following parts ✓ Title ✓ Abstract ✓ Introduction ✓ Methodology ✓ Results ✓ Discussion ✓ Conclusion ✓ References 👉 This polished paper also contains ➝ Diagrams ➝ Tables ➝ Equations ➝ Graphs Once the paper is ready, you can humanize the text. After this, you can download it in the following formats. ↳ MS Word ↳ Latex ↳ Markdown After downloading, make any changes you want. In addition to Gatsbi Reviewer, you can also use: → Gatsbi Innovator: Generate ideas before writing → Gatsbi Writer: Write research papers 🎗️ Try Gatsbi AI today for free: ❄️ Anything you'd like to add?

How to write a systematic literature review in 1 hour? A systematic literature review takes 4-6 months. You can reduce this time. 🎯 Here is how you can write it in 1 hour. 1️⃣ Go to 2️⃣ Select Gatsbi reviewer from the drop-down menu 3️⃣ Enter the topic of your literature review 4️⃣ Gatsbi AI will generate an outline for review 5️⃣ If you are OK with it, click on write manuscript. 6️⃣ Gatsbi will write the literature review for you. 👉 The literature review contains the following parts ✓ Title ✓ Abstract ✓ Introduction ✓ Methodology ✓ Results ✓ Discussion ✓ Conclusion ✓ References 👉 This polished paper also contains ➝ Diagrams ➝ Tables ➝ Equations ➝ Graphs Once the paper is ready, you can humanize the text. After this, you can download it in the following formats. ↳ MS Word ↳ Latex ↳ Markdown After downloading, make any changes you want. In addition to Gatsbi Reviewer, you can also use: → Gatsbi Innovator: Generate ideas before writing → Gatsbi Writer: Write research papers 🎗️ Try Gatsbi AI today for free: ❄️ Anything you'd like to add?

Faheem Ullah

211,618 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Introducing Conductor code review! You can now comment on diffs and send it straight back to Claude without leaving the app. Like a PR review, but for the AI:

Introducing Conductor code review! You can now comment on diffs and send it straight back to Claude without leaving the app. Like a PR review, but for the AI:

Charlie Holtz

73,021 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

AI is changing the software engineering craft. Anders Hejlsberg (Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of C#, TypeScript and industry legend - on why code review needs to get more enjoyable in response: #1 - AI is shifting the craft from writing code, to reviewing code: "In a sense, we're all turning into project managers. We can have an army of junior programmers, called agents, that will just spit out reams of code but someone's got to have the big picture and review all of that. And so, increasingly, our craft is going from one of writing the code, to one of reviewing the code and building the architecture of the code and overseeing the work. It's a different kind of craft. It's a different kind of enjoyment. I've always liked writing the code. To me that was the fulfilling part, seeing it work. In a way, AI robs a little bit of that, because I am less interested in reviewing code." #2 - The code review experience should be improved: "I think we could also make the process of reviewing code much more interesting than it is today. I mean, today, you see a list of diffs in alphabetical order and now it's up to you to make heads or tails of it. There are more pedagogical ways of presenting that. And you could have commentary generated by the AI that tells you what the changes are and whatever, and then tries to guide you along. So that symbiotic relationship, I think we need to work on that more and to keep the enjoyment in there."

AI is changing the software engineering craft. Anders Hejlsberg (Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of C#, TypeScript and industry legend - on why code review needs to get more enjoyable in response: #1 - AI is shifting the craft from writing code, to reviewing code: "In a sense, we're all turning into project managers. We can have an army of junior programmers, called agents, that will just spit out reams of code but someone's got to have the big picture and review all of that. And so, increasingly, our craft is going from one of writing the code, to one of reviewing the code and building the architecture of the code and overseeing the work. It's a different kind of craft. It's a different kind of enjoyment. I've always liked writing the code. To me that was the fulfilling part, seeing it work. In a way, AI robs a little bit of that, because I am less interested in reviewing code." #2 - The code review experience should be improved: "I think we could also make the process of reviewing code much more interesting than it is today. I mean, today, you see a list of diffs in alphabetical order and now it's up to you to make heads or tails of it. There are more pedagogical ways of presenting that. And you could have commentary generated by the AI that tells you what the changes are and whatever, and then tries to guide you along. So that symbiotic relationship, I think we need to work on that more and to keep the enjoyment in there."

The Pragmatic Engineer

39,073 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Writing code is becoming extinct. Let's face it: Software Engineering is moving towards the orchestration of multiple agents running in parallel. I'm now spending 80% of my time reviewing code and only 20% writing it, and even this split might be outdated soon. Tools are moving in this direction as well.

Writing code is becoming extinct. Let's face it: Software Engineering is moving towards the orchestration of multiple agents running in parallel. I'm now spending 80% of my time reviewing code and only 20% writing it, and even this split might be outdated soon. Tools are moving in this direction as well.

Santiago

33,477 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

In the boards of Chapter 3, there exists code for an unused hookshot ability with the cancel button, as long as you aren't Ralsei. It has code to bring you towards objects which can be grabbed by Susie, there is also code that allows you to grab objects which also goes unused.

In the boards of Chapter 3, there exists code for an unused hookshot ability with the cancel button, as long as you aren't Ralsei. It has code to bring you towards objects which can be grabbed by Susie, there is also code that allows you to grab objects which also goes unused.

Daily Toby Fox Trivia (Chapter 5 2026)

26,477 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

As you may have seen, the GitHub MCP registry is now LIVE! But how do you use it in Visual Studio Code? Checkout this video by thejetdev to see how you can access the MCP servers live in the registry today 👇

As you may have seen, the GitHub MCP registry is now LIVE! But how do you use it in Visual Studio Code? Checkout this video by thejetdev to see how you can access the MCP servers live in the registry today 👇

Visual Studio Code

18,566 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten