正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

LeetCode is dead. Developers don't write code line-by-line anymore. They orchestrate AI agents working in parallel, review AI-generated code, and make architectural decisions. That's the job now. But most interview processes haven't caught up. They still test algorithm memorization instead of AI fluency, code review, and judgment. We're building... show more

HackerRank

96,611 subscribers

342,566 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Next-gen developers don’t just write code; they orchestrate AI across the entire software development lifecycle. This evolution is reshaping the way software gets built and what skills matter most in hiring and upskilling. Presenting our October '25 release:

Next-gen developers don’t just write code; they orchestrate AI across the entire software development lifecycle. This evolution is reshaping the way software gets built and what skills matter most in hiring and upskilling. Presenting our October '25 release:

HackerRank

24,847 次观看 • 7 个月前

The best programmers don't write code anymore. They write a spec. A test. An eval. T Then they turn the AI on and walk away for hours. It runs. It ships. They review. Evals are the unlock most devs are sleeping on. Here's how top agent teams build them right.

The best programmers don't write code anymore. They write a spec. A test. An eval. T Then they turn the AI on and walk away for hours. It runs. It ships. They review. Evals are the unlock most devs are sleeping on. Here's how top agent teams build them right.

Rohit

690,326 次观看 • 2 个月前

After reaching AI-native terminal velocity we are swamped in code review. The core insight is that as long as you can write code in parallel you will continue to be stuck until you can review it in parallel. I was surprised by how quickly this became my daily driver for not just review code, but writing it as well.

After reaching AI-native terminal velocity we are swamped in code review. The core insight is that as long as you can write code in parallel you will continue to be stuck until you can review it in parallel. I was surprised by how quickly this became my daily driver for not just review code, but writing it as well.

Evan Boyle

23,954 次观看 • 3 个月前

Reviewing AI-generated code is the new bottleneck. Writing code was slow before. Now, in a few minutes, you can generate virtually unlimited lines of code using AI. But developers are now spending 70% of their time checking that code. That's the new bottleneck. I've been using Cline, and they have a feature that actually helps with this: You can click a button and have Cline generate an inline explanation for every single line of AI-generated code. Take a look at the attached video. What it does: 1. You can read the code and the explanation together 2. You don't lose context while reviewing code 3. You understand the "why" behind each change And here is the best part: It works on any git diff. You can use it to review PRs, understand commits from other people, or catch up on a codebase you haven't touched in a while.

Reviewing AI-generated code is the new bottleneck. Writing code was slow before. Now, in a few minutes, you can generate virtually unlimited lines of code using AI. But developers are now spending 70% of their time checking that code. That's the new bottleneck. I've been using Cline, and they have a feature that actually helps with this: You can click a button and have Cline generate an inline explanation for every single line of AI-generated code. Take a look at the attached video. What it does: 1. You can read the code and the explanation together 2. You don't lose context while reviewing code 3. You understand the "why" behind each change And here is the best part: It works on any git diff. You can use it to review PRs, understand commits from other people, or catch up on a codebase you haven't touched in a while.

Santiago

64,392 次观看 • 6 个月前

Today we're launching REVIEW.FAST, speeding up human review of AI generated code 3X. AI changed the world, sped up writing code, but shifted the bottleneck to review. If you can speed up code review, you can ship more. It's as simple as that.

Today we're launching REVIEW.FAST, speeding up human review of AI generated code 3X. AI changed the world, sped up writing code, but shifted the bottleneck to review. If you can speed up code review, you can ship more. It's as simple as that.

Louis Knight-Webb

45,945 次观看 • 5 个月前

Introducing Diffity 🎉 GitHub style diff and code review tool built for developers and AI

Introducing Diffity 🎉 GitHub style diff and code review tool built for developers and AI

Kamran Ahmed

97,258 次观看 • 2 个月前

At the AI in America Summit, Scott Dietzen, Executive Chair of Augment Code and former CEO of Pure Storage, described how AI is reshaping software development through “meta programming”—where engineers guide and refine AI-generated code rather than writing everything line by line. He argued this shift isn’t about cutting developers, but about unlocking far greater productivity and building more ambitious software than ever before. Explore more: #TheHillTech #AIinTech #FutureOfWork

At the AI in America Summit, Scott Dietzen, Executive Chair of Augment Code and former CEO of Pure Storage, described how AI is reshaping software development through “meta programming”—where engineers guide and refine AI-generated code rather than writing everything line by line. He argued this shift isn’t about cutting developers, but about unlocking far greater productivity and building more ambitious software than ever before. Explore more: #TheHillTech #AIinTech #FutureOfWork

The Hill Events

10,971 次观看 • 5 个月前

Nobody is writing 90% of their code using AI. Here's the uncomfortable truth: The real productivity gain from using AI to write code is closer to 10%, nowhere near the 90% people claim. Sundar Pichai said in 2024 that 30% of the new code at Google was AI-generated. However, he went on to admit, during Lex Friedman's podcast, that engineering velocity had only increased by about 10%. AI-generated code isn't free code. It still has to be reviewed, tested, and made production-ready. Optimizing a single step (code generation) doesn't boost output if bottlenecks shift elsewhere (code reviews). It doesn't matter how much code you generate if you can't keep up the review process. The solution: Automate as much as you can the review and verification of your code. I'm working with Sonar, who is sponsoring this post, and they will take care of the code quality and security analysis of your code: • They review over 300B lines of code every single day • They cover reliability, security, and maintainability for your code • You can integrate them into your CI/CD pipeline • You can install them in your IDE (I use their VSCode extension) • Support for more than 30 languages Here is a link so you can check them out:

Nobody is writing 90% of their code using AI. Here's the uncomfortable truth: The real productivity gain from using AI to write code is closer to 10%, nowhere near the 90% people claim. Sundar Pichai said in 2024 that 30% of the new code at Google was AI-generated. However, he went on to admit, during Lex Friedman's podcast, that engineering velocity had only increased by about 10%. AI-generated code isn't free code. It still has to be reviewed, tested, and made production-ready. Optimizing a single step (code generation) doesn't boost output if bottlenecks shift elsewhere (code reviews). It doesn't matter how much code you generate if you can't keep up the review process. The solution: Automate as much as you can the review and verification of your code. I'm working with Sonar, who is sponsoring this post, and they will take care of the code quality and security analysis of your code: • They review over 300B lines of code every single day • They cover reliability, security, and maintainability for your code • You can integrate them into your CI/CD pipeline • You can install them in your IDE (I use their VSCode extension) • Support for more than 30 languages Here is a link so you can check them out:

Santiago

296,299 次观看 • 8 个月前

Anthropic CPO, Mike Krieger: "over 70% of Anthropic pull requests are now generated by AI" but we're still figuring out what that means for code review and long-term architecture.

Anthropic CPO, Mike Krieger: "over 70% of Anthropic pull requests are now generated by AI" but we're still figuring out what that means for code review and long-term architecture.

Haider.

97,999 次观看 • 1 年前

They say AI is the end for developers. They say the job market is gone. They say learning to code is pointless. I don’t buy it. I think we're just getting started.

They say AI is the end for developers. They say the job market is gone. They say learning to code is pointless. I don’t buy it. I think we're just getting started.

Aaron Francis

272,663 次观看 • 4 个月前

We've built a massive verification bottleneck: • 72% of developers use AI to generate code every day • 96% of them don't fully trust it Writing code is now free. All the work now is verifying that the code does what it's supposed to. According to a new State of Code Survey, almost half of the respondents believe the number one skill that will matter most in the coming years is "reviewing and validating AI-generated code for quality and security". Not prompt engineering or vibe-coding, but checking AI's work.

We've built a massive verification bottleneck: • 72% of developers use AI to generate code every day • 96% of them don't fully trust it Writing code is now free. All the work now is verifying that the code does what it's supposed to. According to a new State of Code Survey, almost half of the respondents believe the number one skill that will matter most in the coming years is "reviewing and validating AI-generated code for quality and security". Not prompt engineering or vibe-coding, but checking AI's work.

Santiago

16,299 次观看 • 4 个月前

Marc Andreessen: AI coding doesn’t eliminate programmers — it redefines them. The job is no longer typing code line by line, it’s orchestrating 10 coding bots in parallel, arguing with them, debugging their output, changing the spec, and pushing them toward the right result. But here’s the catch: if you don’t understand how to write code yourself, you can’t evaluate what the AI gives you. The next layer of programming isn’t writing scripts — it’s supervising AI that writes them. Today’s best programmers spend their day jumping between terminals, managing multiple coding bots, fixing mistakes, and refining instructions. The irony? You still need deep fundamentals, because without them, you won’t know when the AI is wrong. The job of the programmer has changed. Now it’s about arguing with coding bots, debugging AI-generated code, and understanding why something doesn’t work or isn’t fast enough. AI abstracts the work — but only people who truly understand code can tell if the abstraction is doing the right thing. Programmers aren’t going away — they’re becoming 10x, 100x, even 1,000x more productive. Tasks are changing, the job is changing, but humans are still overseeing the process, evaluating results, fixing errors, and making judgment calls. AI changes how we code, not who is responsible. The future programmer isn’t replaced by AI — they’re upgraded by it. You still need to learn how to write and understand code, because when the AI gets it wrong, humans are the ones who have to know why. That up-leveling of capability is the real revolution.

Marc Andreessen: AI coding doesn’t eliminate programmers — it redefines them. The job is no longer typing code line by line, it’s orchestrating 10 coding bots in parallel, arguing with them, debugging their output, changing the spec, and pushing them toward the right result. But here’s the catch: if you don’t understand how to write code yourself, you can’t evaluate what the AI gives you. The next layer of programming isn’t writing scripts — it’s supervising AI that writes them. Today’s best programmers spend their day jumping between terminals, managing multiple coding bots, fixing mistakes, and refining instructions. The irony? You still need deep fundamentals, because without them, you won’t know when the AI is wrong. The job of the programmer has changed. Now it’s about arguing with coding bots, debugging AI-generated code, and understanding why something doesn’t work or isn’t fast enough. AI abstracts the work — but only people who truly understand code can tell if the abstraction is doing the right thing. Programmers aren’t going away — they’re becoming 10x, 100x, even 1,000x more productive. Tasks are changing, the job is changing, but humans are still overseeing the process, evaluating results, fixing errors, and making judgment calls. AI changes how we code, not who is responsible. The future programmer isn’t replaced by AI — they’re upgraded by it. You still need to learn how to write and understand code, because when the AI gets it wrong, humans are the ones who have to know why. That up-leveling of capability is the real revolution.

Ian Miles Cheong

911,353 次观看 • 3 个月前

AI-powered coding, built for developers. 💡 Gemini Code Assist for individuals now brings: ⚡ Up to 180K code completions/month 🤖 AI-powered code reviews for GitHub 🛠️ Coding assistance in VS Code and JetBrains IDEs Start building →

AI-powered coding, built for developers. 💡 Gemini Code Assist for individuals now brings: ⚡ Up to 180K code completions/month 🤖 AI-powered code reviews for GitHub 🛠️ Coding assistance in VS Code and JetBrains IDEs Start building →

Google for Developers

40,025 次观看 • 1 年前

Anthropic CEO: “In the next 3 to 6 months, AI will write 90% of the code, and within 12 months, nearly all code may be generated by AI.” the job isn’t coding anymore, it’s telling machines what to build.

Anthropic CEO: “In the next 3 to 6 months, AI will write 90% of the code, and within 12 months, nearly all code may be generated by AI.” the job isn’t coding anymore, it’s telling machines what to build.

CG

890,705 次观看 • 2 个月前

🔥 JUST IN: Claude AI launches Code Review, where AI agents automatically review PRs for bugs.

🔥 JUST IN: Claude AI launches Code Review, where AI agents automatically review PRs for bugs.

Cointelegraph

35,312 次观看 • 2 个月前

Cursor shipped a /thermo-nuclear-code-review for the TOUGHEST AI code review possible. But is it any good? Let's dive in:

Cursor shipped a /thermo-nuclear-code-review for the TOUGHEST AI code review possible. But is it any good? Let's dive in:

Matt Pocock

131,163 次观看 • 7 天前

How good is Claude Code Review really, and is it worth $25+ per review? We scraped every OSS repo on GitHub that's using it to figure out how devs actually use it. Here's how it stacks up against 22 other tools: Featuring: Augment Code baz CodeAnt AI (YC W24) CodeRabbit Cognition cubic Cursor Google Gemini Greptile Kilo Kody from Kodus Mesa Qodo

How good is Claude Code Review really, and is it worth $25+ per review? We scraped every OSS repo on GitHub that's using it to figure out how devs actually use it. Here's how it stacks up against 22 other tools: Featuring: Augment Code baz CodeAnt AI (YC W24) CodeRabbit Cognition cubic Cursor Google Gemini Greptile Kilo Kody from Kodus Mesa Qodo

Martian

48,768 次观看 • 2 个月前

Chamath on how AI agents are making the "10x engineer" distinction disappear because the most efficient "code paths" are now obvious to everyone. Just as AI solved chess and removed the mystery of the best move, AI is doing the same for coding, making the process reductive and removing technical differentiation. "I'm going to say something controversial: I don't think developers anymore have good judgment. Developers get to the answer, or they don't get to the answer, and that's what agents have done. The 10x engineer used to have better judgment than the 1x engineer, but by making everybody a 10x engineer, you're taking judgment away. You're taking code paths that are now obvious and making them available to everybody. It's effectively like what happened in chess: an AI created a solver so everybody understood the most efficient path in every single spot to do the most EV-positive (expected value positive) thing. Coding is very similar in that way; you can reduce it and view it very reductively, so there is no differentiation in code." --- From The All-In Podcast YT channel (link in comment)

Chamath on how AI agents are making the "10x engineer" distinction disappear because the most efficient "code paths" are now obvious to everyone. Just as AI solved chess and removed the mystery of the best move, AI is doing the same for coding, making the process reductive and removing technical differentiation. "I'm going to say something controversial: I don't think developers anymore have good judgment. Developers get to the answer, or they don't get to the answer, and that's what agents have done. The 10x engineer used to have better judgment than the 1x engineer, but by making everybody a 10x engineer, you're taking judgment away. You're taking code paths that are now obvious and making them available to everybody. It's effectively like what happened in chess: an AI created a solver so everybody understood the most efficient path in every single spot to do the most EV-positive (expected value positive) thing. Coding is very similar in that way; you can reduce it and view it very reductively, so there is no differentiation in code." --- From The All-In Podcast YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

831,450 次观看 • 2 个月前

The bottleneck in coding is now the time it takes a human to review agent-generated code. But existing review UIs don't work well for agents. So we built a new one into Amp.

The bottleneck in coding is now the time it takes a human to review agent-generated code. But existing review UIs don't work well for agents. So we built a new one into Amp.

Beyang

62,900 次观看 • 7 个月前

Anthropic engineer showed how one person can run 5 AI agents, that code, test, review, and deploy at the same time. In 30 minutes they built the whole thing live in one session. Here's what they cover: > when to use one agent vs a full team > how to split work so agents don't step on each other > the exact framework for deciding what each agent handles that's exactly why, I put together a guide on building agent teams that actually work. full guide in the article below 👇

Anthropic engineer showed how one person can run 5 AI agents, that code, test, review, and deploy at the same time. In 30 minutes they built the whole thing live in one session. Here's what they cover: > when to use one agent vs a full team > how to split work so agents don't step on each other > the exact framework for deciding what each agent handles that's exactly why, I put together a guide on building agent teams that actually work. full guide in the article below 👇

darkzodchi

829,518 次观看 • 11 天前