Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

After Rep. Garcia (D-CA) claimed that the hearing on ActBlue is nothing more than a charade, Rep. Jim Jordan made him eat his own words. "Let's be clear. We're here because ACTBlue's legal counsel said Ms. Wallace-Jones lied to Congress, willfully and knowingly misled the Congress of the United...

AndrewKolvet's profile picture

Andrew Kolvet

305,891 subscribers

406,076 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones smirks as she invokes the Fifth Amendment in response to every question from Rep. Jim Jordan: Jordan: "We're here because ActBlue's legal counsel said Ms. Wallace-Jones lied to Congress, willingly and knowingly misled the Congress of the United States...So I have just a couple questions for you, Ms. Wallace-Jones...Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution."
2:08

ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones smirks as she invokes the Fifth Amendment in response to every question from Rep. Jim Jordan: Jordan: "We're here because ActBlue's legal counsel said Ms. Wallace-Jones lied to Congress, willingly and knowingly misled the Congress of the United States...So I have just a couple questions for you, Ms. Wallace-Jones...Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution."

Julia 🇺🇸

12,478 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. ActBlue just PLED THE 5TH and REFUSED to answer about getting foreign donations infiltrating US politics on behalf of Democrats She wouldn't even refute getting RUSSIAN money! 🤯 ActBlue is a FRAUD group. Shut it down! REP. JIM JORDAN: Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: We won't keep you here all day, but let me just do one more. Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. Absolutely insane.
1:40

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. ActBlue just PLED THE 5TH and REFUSED to answer about getting foreign donations infiltrating US politics on behalf of Democrats She wouldn't even refute getting RUSSIAN money! 🤯 ActBlue is a FRAUD group. Shut it down! REP. JIM JORDAN: Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: We won't keep you here all day, but let me just do one more. Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. Absolutely insane.

Eric Daugherty

1,159,052 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. ActBlue just PLED THE 5TH and REFUSED to answer about getting foreign donations infiltrating US politics on behalf of Democrats She wouldn't even refute getting RUSSIAN money! 🤯 ActBlue is a FRAUD group. Shut it down! REP. JIM JORDAN: Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: We won't keep you here all day, but let me just do one more. Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. Absolutely insane.
1:40

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. ActBlue just PLED THE 5TH and REFUSED to answer about getting foreign donations infiltrating US politics on behalf of Democrats She wouldn't even refute getting RUSSIAN money! 🤯 ActBlue is a FRAUD group. Shut it down! REP. JIM JORDAN: Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: We won't keep you here all day, but let me just do one more. Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. Absolutely insane.

War Correspondent

43,679 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 BREAKING: ActBlue cofounder Matt DeBergalis just PANICKED and PLEADED THE 5TH in a closed-door deposition with House committee investigators — Fox News This comes after ActBlue is accused of allowing FOREIGN DONATIONS that INFILTRATE US politics for Democrats, without proper measures to stop it Here's the shocking exchange between Rep. Jim Jordan and an ActBlue official when they also pleaded the 5th. SHUT IT DOWN. JORDAN: Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: We won't keep you here all day, but let me just do one more. Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution.
1:40

🚨 BREAKING: ActBlue cofounder Matt DeBergalis just PANICKED and PLEADED THE 5TH in a closed-door deposition with House committee investigators — Fox News This comes after ActBlue is accused of allowing FOREIGN DONATIONS that INFILTRATE US politics for Democrats, without proper measures to stop it Here's the shocking exchange between Rep. Jim Jordan and an ActBlue official when they also pleaded the 5th. SHUT IT DOWN. JORDAN: Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: We won't keep you here all day, but let me just do one more. Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution.

Eric Daugherty

798,185 просмотров • 15 дней назад

JORDAN: How much fraud is too much fraud? JORDAN: How many foreign contributions did you accept? JORDAN: How much did you receive from Russia? JORDAN: Why did your legal team quit? ActBlue CEO: I plead the fifth x4
1:05

JORDAN: How much fraud is too much fraud? JORDAN: How many foreign contributions did you accept? JORDAN: How much did you receive from Russia? JORDAN: Why did your legal team quit? ActBlue CEO: I plead the fifth x4

RNC Research

357,636 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Jim Jordan just hammered ActBlue with question after question about alleged foreign donations and fraud controls. And what happened? Question after question was met with the same response: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights.” Jordan asked about alleged foreign contributions, fraud detection, internal standards, and reports involving the organization’s legal team. No answers. Just the Fifth. When an organization at the center of America’s political fundraising system refuses to answer basic questions, people are going to demand transparency. The more questions that go unanswered, the bigger this story gets. 🔥
1:23

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Jim Jordan just hammered ActBlue with question after question about alleged foreign donations and fraud controls. And what happened? Question after question was met with the same response: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights.” Jordan asked about alleged foreign contributions, fraud detection, internal standards, and reports involving the organization’s legal team. No answers. Just the Fifth. When an organization at the center of America’s political fundraising system refuses to answer basic questions, people are going to demand transparency. The more questions that go unanswered, the bigger this story gets. 🔥

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

79,642 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

ActBlue took the Fifth. Again. And again. And again. Did you weaken fraud standards to help Democrats? Fifth Amendment. Did you accept foreign money? Fifth Amendment. Did you lie to Congress? Fifth Amendment. ActBlue is a money laundering operation for foreign donations into Democrat campaigns. Covington & Burling may be right in the middle of it. Drag them in. Put them under oath. Get answers.
6:40

ActBlue took the Fifth. Again. And again. And again. Did you weaken fraud standards to help Democrats? Fifth Amendment. Did you accept foreign money? Fifth Amendment. Did you lie to Congress? Fifth Amendment. ActBlue is a money laundering operation for foreign donations into Democrat campaigns. Covington & Burling may be right in the middle of it. Drag them in. Put them under oath. Get answers.

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

46,599 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Senator Ashley Moody: This is the pardon you have heard so much about. And Dr. Fauci, from what I can tell, is the only other person who got a pardon like this, I believe, who had the last name Biden. This pardon goes back to January 1, 2014. Did you talk to President Biden and ask for this pardon? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” Who did you talk to in the White House about this pardon? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” Did you specifically ask that it be dated back to the beginning of 2014? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” Did you do that so that you would be given immunity going back to the beginning of 2014? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” I’m just very interested in why it was this date. Did it have anything to do with the fact that 2014 was also the year that the NIAID or NIH began funding the Alliance for Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence grant?
1:24

Senator Ashley Moody: This is the pardon you have heard so much about. And Dr. Fauci, from what I can tell, is the only other person who got a pardon like this, I believe, who had the last name Biden. This pardon goes back to January 1, 2014. Did you talk to President Biden and ask for this pardon? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” Who did you talk to in the White House about this pardon? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” Did you specifically ask that it be dated back to the beginning of 2014? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” Did you do that so that you would be given immunity going back to the beginning of 2014? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” I’m just very interested in why it was this date. Did it have anything to do with the fact that 2014 was also the year that the NIAID or NIH began funding the Alliance for Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence grant?

Jammles

236,452 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 JUST NOW: Dr. Fauci tells anyone whose family members DIED from the vaccine to screw off, he's not answering or apologizing MORENO: Will you apologize to the family members of the people who died because they took your advice and not only got the first vaccine but the five, six other boosters that they did not need? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. MORENO: You won't apologize to the military members who Joe Biden summarily dismissed from the military for not taking the vaccine? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. MORENO: Will you apologize to the business owners that lost their business, shattered their lives, and they'll never recover? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. MORENO: Will you apologize to the moms who had to force their infant children, two, three, four year olds to put masks on, and what that did and how that traumatized those kids? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Bernie Moreno
1:45

🚨 JUST NOW: Dr. Fauci tells anyone whose family members DIED from the vaccine to screw off, he's not answering or apologizing MORENO: Will you apologize to the family members of the people who died because they took your advice and not only got the first vaccine but the five, six other boosters that they did not need? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. MORENO: You won't apologize to the military members who Joe Biden summarily dismissed from the military for not taking the vaccine? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. MORENO: Will you apologize to the business owners that lost their business, shattered their lives, and they'll never recover? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. MORENO: Will you apologize to the moms who had to force their infant children, two, three, four year olds to put masks on, and what that did and how that traumatized those kids? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Bernie Moreno

Eric Daugherty

100,502 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 WOW! The co-founder of ActBlue just pled the 5th in closed-door hearings, then RAN AWAY from the press asking if ActBlue fraudulently allowed foreign donations to Democrats This is total madness — ActBlue is likely bringing in FOREIGN CASH to get Dems elected MELUGIN FOLLOWS HIM: "Sir, is ActBlue secure ahead of the midterms this fall? Does your platform accept foreign donations? How do you verify your donor, sir? Do you plan to answer any questions today?" No response. He pulled a FAUCI in the hearing. "At least five current and former ActBlue employees previously deposed by the committee all invoke their Fifth Amendment rights. We're talking more than 140 times in total!" Bill Melugin
2:15

🚨 WOW! The co-founder of ActBlue just pled the 5th in closed-door hearings, then RAN AWAY from the press asking if ActBlue fraudulently allowed foreign donations to Democrats This is total madness — ActBlue is likely bringing in FOREIGN CASH to get Dems elected MELUGIN FOLLOWS HIM: "Sir, is ActBlue secure ahead of the midterms this fall? Does your platform accept foreign donations? How do you verify your donor, sir? Do you plan to answer any questions today?" No response. He pulled a FAUCI in the hearing. "At least five current and former ActBlue employees previously deposed by the committee all invoke their Fifth Amendment rights. We're talking more than 140 times in total!" Bill Melugin

Eric Daugherty

76,109 просмотров • 15 дней назад

Rep. Dean on the Rubio/Iran Call: I did ask a set of questions to the Secretary and to Mr. Witkoff. He cut my mic off and my question smartassed and stupid, cut my mic off and said, there's your answer. I was simply asking tough questions about who wrote the MOU and why does it sound so in favor of Iran? I asked Mr. Witkoff, I said, in your work, how much of your work in the region is for the United States of America and resolving these issues, and how much of your time is being spent on your own ventures? That I think really ticked them off
2:43

Rep. Dean on the Rubio/Iran Call: I did ask a set of questions to the Secretary and to Mr. Witkoff. He cut my mic off and my question smartassed and stupid, cut my mic off and said, there's your answer. I was simply asking tough questions about who wrote the MOU and why does it sound so in favor of Iran? I asked Mr. Witkoff, I said, in your work, how much of your work in the region is for the United States of America and resolving these issues, and how much of your time is being spent on your own ventures? That I think really ticked them off

Acyn

225,628 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

PAUL: "In the red folder on your table is a copy of Section 192 of Title 2 of the U.S. Code... That section makes it a CRIME for a witness... to REFUSE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS... Do you have that in front of you?" FAUCI: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer, but based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution." PAUL: "Let the record reflect that the witness has refused to answer whether there's a folder in front of him based on his Fifth Amendment right."
0:48

PAUL: "In the red folder on your table is a copy of Section 192 of Title 2 of the U.S. Code... That section makes it a CRIME for a witness... to REFUSE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS... Do you have that in front of you?" FAUCI: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer, but based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution." PAUL: "Let the record reflect that the witness has refused to answer whether there's a folder in front of him based on his Fifth Amendment right."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

247,555 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“Why didn’t you tell the truth?” Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan said to Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz during a House Oversight Committee hearing on fraud and the "misuse" of federal funds in the state. “We did tell you, and Feeding our Future grew because of the pandemic,” Walz responded. The hearing comes after Republicans launched an investigation into how Minnesota handled taxpayer dollars.
5:29

“Why didn’t you tell the truth?” Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan said to Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz during a House Oversight Committee hearing on fraud and the "misuse" of federal funds in the state. “We did tell you, and Feeding our Future grew because of the pandemic,” Walz responded. The hearing comes after Republicans launched an investigation into how Minnesota handled taxpayer dollars.

CBS News

87,755 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

.Rand Paul: "In the red folder on your table is a copy of Section 192 of Title 2 of the U.S. Code...that section makes it a crime for a witness appearing under subpoena to refuse to answer any questions pertinent to the question under inquiry. Do you have that in front of you?" FAUCI: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution." Rand Paul: "Let the record record that the witness has refused to answer whether there's a folder in front of him based on his Fifth Amendment right." 😂
0:39

.Rand Paul: "In the red folder on your table is a copy of Section 192 of Title 2 of the U.S. Code...that section makes it a crime for a witness appearing under subpoena to refuse to answer any questions pertinent to the question under inquiry. Do you have that in front of you?" FAUCI: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution." Rand Paul: "Let the record record that the witness has refused to answer whether there's a folder in front of him based on his Fifth Amendment right." 😂

Daily Wire

113,055 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 JUST NOW: JD Vance goes HARD against Democrats as the PARTY OF FRAUD "They are so focused on FRAUD, because so many of their friends get RICH from fraud, that they forgot to look after YOU!" 🔥 "When the President of the United States asked the entire Congress to stand for the simple principle that the people's government ought to fight for the American people first, what did we see? We said, we saw every single congressional Democrat sit on their hands. They didn't care about YOU!" "They didn't care about the people of this district. They didn't care about the farmers, or the factory workers, or the people who actually make this country run." "Because now we have, in Washington, DC, a Democrat party that is so focused on illegal immigration, that is so focused on people who don't have the legal right to be here!"
1:34

🚨 JUST NOW: JD Vance goes HARD against Democrats as the PARTY OF FRAUD "They are so focused on FRAUD, because so many of their friends get RICH from fraud, that they forgot to look after YOU!" 🔥 "When the President of the United States asked the entire Congress to stand for the simple principle that the people's government ought to fight for the American people first, what did we see? We said, we saw every single congressional Democrat sit on their hands. They didn't care about YOU!" "They didn't care about the people of this district. They didn't care about the farmers, or the factory workers, or the people who actually make this country run." "Because now we have, in Washington, DC, a Democrat party that is so focused on illegal immigration, that is so focused on people who don't have the legal right to be here!"

Eric Daugherty

23,084 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 JD VANCE GOES ABSOLUTELY NUCLEAR ON THE DEMOCRATS: “They are so focused on FRAUD, because so many of their friends get RICH from fraud, that they forgot to look after YOU!” “When the President of the United States asked the entire Congress to stand for the simple principle that the people’s government ought to fight for the American people first, what did we see? Every single congressional Democrat sat on their hands. They didn’t care about YOU!” “They didn’t care about the farmers, the factory workers, or the people who actually make this country run. Because the modern Democrat Party is completely obsessed with illegal immigration and people who don’t even have the legal right to be here!”
1:34

🚨 JD VANCE GOES ABSOLUTELY NUCLEAR ON THE DEMOCRATS: “They are so focused on FRAUD, because so many of their friends get RICH from fraud, that they forgot to look after YOU!” “When the President of the United States asked the entire Congress to stand for the simple principle that the people’s government ought to fight for the American people first, what did we see? Every single congressional Democrat sat on their hands. They didn’t care about YOU!” “They didn’t care about the farmers, the factory workers, or the people who actually make this country run. Because the modern Democrat Party is completely obsessed with illegal immigration and people who don’t even have the legal right to be here!”

Gunther Eagleman™

339,412 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

NUCLEAR: After a reporter accused Pirro's office of "FAILURE," Jeanine Pirro let every reporter know that the BS questions will NOT fly with her. "I am in a legal lane. All of the rest is white noise. I don't care what they say. I have a job." One dipsht reporter asked: "Are you willing to CONCEDE?" Pirro went ALL OUT: "DID YOU HEAR WHAT I JUST SAID?" "I just said that this decision will be appealed by the United States Department of Justice. That's the answer to your question. We're looking at 1,001. And we're also looking at a statute having to do with fraud, but it's up to the grand jury to make that decision." "We're a BILLION DOLLARS over in cost overruns. Are you kidding? A BILLION DOLLARS? We're not talking about huge buildings here." Lett'em have it, Judge!
1:40

NUCLEAR: After a reporter accused Pirro's office of "FAILURE," Jeanine Pirro let every reporter know that the BS questions will NOT fly with her. "I am in a legal lane. All of the rest is white noise. I don't care what they say. I have a job." One dipsht reporter asked: "Are you willing to CONCEDE?" Pirro went ALL OUT: "DID YOU HEAR WHAT I JUST SAID?" "I just said that this decision will be appealed by the United States Department of Justice. That's the answer to your question. We're looking at 1,001. And we're also looking at a statute having to do with fraud, but it's up to the grand jury to make that decision." "We're a BILLION DOLLARS over in cost overruns. Are you kidding? A BILLION DOLLARS? We're not talking about huge buildings here." Lett'em have it, Judge!

Gunther Eagleman™

450,420 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 WOW! VP JD Vance says the fraud discovered in Maine is SO BAD it might literally rank THIRD in the entire country, behind only California and Minnesota "why did Maine go from a state that did not have a serious fraud problem to one where I can honestly say it's one of the worst states in the union?" His answer? Janet Mills and Joe Biden. One is already gone. The other is on her way out, thankfully
1:16

🚨 WOW! VP JD Vance says the fraud discovered in Maine is SO BAD it might literally rank THIRD in the entire country, behind only California and Minnesota "why did Maine go from a state that did not have a serious fraud problem to one where I can honestly say it's one of the worst states in the union?" His answer? Janet Mills and Joe Biden. One is already gone. The other is on her way out, thankfully

Nick Sortor

187,787 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

NEW: Ted Cruz stumps CNN’s Kaitlan Collins with a history lesson after she tried gaslighting him on accepting election results. 🔥🔥🔥 Collins: Do you plan to object or will you accept the results regardless of who wins the election? Cruz: I think that's actually a ridiculous question. Cruz: I tried to look through history and precedent, and the best precedent I could find was the election of 1876 between Rutherford B Hayes and Samuel Tilden. And what happened there? There were serious allegations of voter fraud. Congress didn't throw its hands up and say, you know what? CNN demanded that, accept the results no matter what. So ignore the fraud. What did Congress do in 1876? How did the president handle it? What did Congress do in 1876? You can't answer. Can you answer my question? Why are you refusing to answer my question? Collins: I'm conducting the interview with all due respect.
2:31

NEW: Ted Cruz stumps CNN’s Kaitlan Collins with a history lesson after she tried gaslighting him on accepting election results. 🔥🔥🔥 Collins: Do you plan to object or will you accept the results regardless of who wins the election? Cruz: I think that's actually a ridiculous question. Cruz: I tried to look through history and precedent, and the best precedent I could find was the election of 1876 between Rutherford B Hayes and Samuel Tilden. And what happened there? There were serious allegations of voter fraud. Congress didn't throw its hands up and say, you know what? CNN demanded that, accept the results no matter what. So ignore the fraud. What did Congress do in 1876? How did the president handle it? What did Congress do in 1876? You can't answer. Can you answer my question? Why are you refusing to answer my question? Collins: I'm conducting the interview with all due respect.

Collin Rugg

1,553,116 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Official ActBlue training documents show ActBlue was training their employees to ignore fraud They even trained their employees to let donations come in with fake names and not flag suspicious fraudulent donations from campaigns Democrats actually setup their donation systems to intentionally allow fraud to happen We need prison sentences for prominent Democrats and their donors The next 4 items that I'm about to show you all come from ActBlue's internal policy and training materials, written by ActBlue's own management for ActBlue's own fraud review staff to guide how the company must handle suspicious donations day to day: “First, we've got a security briefing sent to ActBlue staff explaining why certain red flags were not a priority. And I quote, "We are not the primary target of people looking to commit merchant fraud. People who steal credit card information don't try to give that money away." Second, from the onboarding guide given to every new hire on the fraud prevention team, "We want to give our donors the benefit of the doubt and think about the reasons why a contribution is legitimate." trainees were never told to reject a donation over a single suspicious characteristic. One red flag just isn't enough. Give it the benefit of the doubt” Here’s where it gets really criminal “Third, from that same training material, and this one is honestly almost too gross to believe, I quote, "If an otherwise legitimate donor uses a fake name, we would want to accept their donations." Fourth, also from that training material, staff were instructed that when a campaign itself enters a large suspicious donation directly, they should look past it because flagging it might put the campaign in, quote, "an awkward position of having to call their own donor and ask what's going on’” People need to go to prison
3:04

Official ActBlue training documents show ActBlue was training their employees to ignore fraud They even trained their employees to let donations come in with fake names and not flag suspicious fraudulent donations from campaigns Democrats actually setup their donation systems to intentionally allow fraud to happen We need prison sentences for prominent Democrats and their donors The next 4 items that I'm about to show you all come from ActBlue's internal policy and training materials, written by ActBlue's own management for ActBlue's own fraud review staff to guide how the company must handle suspicious donations day to day: “First, we've got a security briefing sent to ActBlue staff explaining why certain red flags were not a priority. And I quote, "We are not the primary target of people looking to commit merchant fraud. People who steal credit card information don't try to give that money away." Second, from the onboarding guide given to every new hire on the fraud prevention team, "We want to give our donors the benefit of the doubt and think about the reasons why a contribution is legitimate." trainees were never told to reject a donation over a single suspicious characteristic. One red flag just isn't enough. Give it the benefit of the doubt” Here’s where it gets really criminal “Third, from that same training material, and this one is honestly almost too gross to believe, I quote, "If an otherwise legitimate donor uses a fake name, we would want to accept their donations." Fourth, also from that training material, staff were instructed that when a campaign itself enters a large suspicious donation directly, they should look past it because flagging it might put the campaign in, quote, "an awkward position of having to call their own donor and ask what's going on’” People need to go to prison

Wall Street Apes

49,989 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад