Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Jim Jordan just hammered ActBlue with question after question about alleged foreign donations and fraud controls. And what happened? Question after question was met with the same response: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights.” Jordan asked...

BarronTNews_'s profile picture

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

779,465 subscribers

79,642 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. ActBlue just PLED THE 5TH and REFUSED to answer about getting foreign donations infiltrating US politics on behalf of Democrats She wouldn't even refute getting RUSSIAN money! 🤯 ActBlue is a FRAUD group. Shut it down! REP. JIM JORDAN: Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: We won't keep you here all day, but let me just do one more. Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. Absolutely insane.
1:40

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. ActBlue just PLED THE 5TH and REFUSED to answer about getting foreign donations infiltrating US politics on behalf of Democrats She wouldn't even refute getting RUSSIAN money! 🤯 ActBlue is a FRAUD group. Shut it down! REP. JIM JORDAN: Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: We won't keep you here all day, but let me just do one more. Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. Absolutely insane.

Eric Daugherty

1,157,166 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. ActBlue just PLED THE 5TH and REFUSED to answer about getting foreign donations infiltrating US politics on behalf of Democrats She wouldn't even refute getting RUSSIAN money! 🤯 ActBlue is a FRAUD group. Shut it down! REP. JIM JORDAN: Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: We won't keep you here all day, but let me just do one more. Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. Absolutely insane.
1:40

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. ActBlue just PLED THE 5TH and REFUSED to answer about getting foreign donations infiltrating US politics on behalf of Democrats She wouldn't even refute getting RUSSIAN money! 🤯 ActBlue is a FRAUD group. Shut it down! REP. JIM JORDAN: Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. JORDAN: We won't keep you here all day, but let me just do one more. Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats? ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution. Absolutely insane.

War Correspondent

43,635 просмотров • 23 дней назад

ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones smirks as she invokes the Fifth Amendment in response to every question from Rep. Jim Jordan: Jordan: "We're here because ActBlue's legal counsel said Ms. Wallace-Jones lied to Congress, willingly and knowingly misled the Congress of the United States...So I have just a couple questions for you, Ms. Wallace-Jones...Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution."
2:08

ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones smirks as she invokes the Fifth Amendment in response to every question from Rep. Jim Jordan: Jordan: "We're here because ActBlue's legal counsel said Ms. Wallace-Jones lied to Congress, willingly and knowingly misled the Congress of the United States...So I have just a couple questions for you, Ms. Wallace-Jones...Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." Jordan: "Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats?" Wallace-Jones: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution."

Julia 🇺🇸

12,478 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

After Rep. Garcia (D-CA) claimed that the hearing on ActBlue is nothing more than a charade, Rep. Jim Jordan made him eat his own words. "Let's be clear. We're here because ACTBlue's legal counsel said Ms. Wallace-Jones lied to Congress, willfully and knowingly misled the Congress of the United States. That's why we're here." Jordan then asked her these six questions. Her answer to every single one was the same: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." - "How much fraud is too much fraud?" - "How many foreign contributions did ACTBlue accept?" - "How much money did ACTBlue accept from Russia?" - "Why did your entire legal team quit, your in-house legal team?" - "Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards?" - "Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats?" This is an eye-opener that everyone should watch.
2:12

After Rep. Garcia (D-CA) claimed that the hearing on ActBlue is nothing more than a charade, Rep. Jim Jordan made him eat his own words. "Let's be clear. We're here because ACTBlue's legal counsel said Ms. Wallace-Jones lied to Congress, willfully and knowingly misled the Congress of the United States. That's why we're here." Jordan then asked her these six questions. Her answer to every single one was the same: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution." - "How much fraud is too much fraud?" - "How many foreign contributions did ACTBlue accept?" - "How much money did ACTBlue accept from Russia?" - "Why did your entire legal team quit, your in-house legal team?" - "Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards?" - "Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats?" This is an eye-opener that everyone should watch.

Andrew Kolvet

406,025 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

.Rep. Barry Loudermilk: "I want to be respectful. Is it Ms. Jones or Ms. Wallace-Jones?" ActBlue CEO: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my fifth amendment rights under the constitution." 🤡🌎
0:23

.Rep. Barry Loudermilk: "I want to be respectful. Is it Ms. Jones or Ms. Wallace-Jones?" ActBlue CEO: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my fifth amendment rights under the constitution." 🤡🌎

Andrew @ Don’t Walk, RUN!

36,337 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨Yes, THIS literally just happened... HAWLEY: “Let’s try something. What day of the week is it today?” FAUCI: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.”
1:04

🚨Yes, THIS literally just happened... HAWLEY: “Let’s try something. What day of the week is it today?” FAUCI: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.”

Election Wizard

1,250,664 просмотров • 8 дней назад

After yet another fifth amendment statement from Dr Fauci, Senator Moreno asks; "What does the fifth amendment of the constitution say?" Dr Fauci turns and looks at his lawyers and answers: "on the advice of counsel l respectively decline to answer based upon my rights under the fifth amendment of the constitution."
0:44

After yet another fifth amendment statement from Dr Fauci, Senator Moreno asks; "What does the fifth amendment of the constitution say?" Dr Fauci turns and looks at his lawyers and answers: "on the advice of counsel l respectively decline to answer based upon my rights under the fifth amendment of the constitution."

RefugeOfSinners (ROS)

25,367 просмотров • 8 дней назад

MORENO: "What does the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution say?" [Lawyer taps Fauci over the shoulder and whispers in his ear] FAUCI: "I respectfully decline to answer..." MORENO: "Do you know who wrote the Fifth Amendment?" FAUCI: "I respectfully decline to answer..." MORENO: "So you're invoking a right that you don't know who wrote it or what it says. Is that correct?" FAUCI: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution." MORENO: "Wow."
0:58

MORENO: "What does the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution say?" [Lawyer taps Fauci over the shoulder and whispers in his ear] FAUCI: "I respectfully decline to answer..." MORENO: "Do you know who wrote the Fifth Amendment?" FAUCI: "I respectfully decline to answer..." MORENO: "So you're invoking a right that you don't know who wrote it or what it says. Is that correct?" FAUCI: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution." MORENO: "Wow."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

84,951 просмотров • 8 дней назад

No answers, just the same script... 111 times. Dr. Anthony Fauci stonewalled the Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee by repeatedly invoking the Fifth Amendment during today's hearing on COVID-19 and the former NIAID director's conduct throughout the pandemic. "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution."
1:40

No answers, just the same script... 111 times. Dr. Anthony Fauci stonewalled the Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee by repeatedly invoking the Fifth Amendment during today's hearing on COVID-19 and the former NIAID director's conduct throughout the pandemic. "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution."

Fox News

774,560 просмотров • 8 дней назад

Senator Ashley Moody: This is the pardon you have heard so much about. And Dr. Fauci, from what I can tell, is the only other person who got a pardon like this, I believe, who had the last name Biden. This pardon goes back to January 1, 2014. Did you talk to President Biden and ask for this pardon? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” Who did you talk to in the White House about this pardon? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” Did you specifically ask that it be dated back to the beginning of 2014? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” Did you do that so that you would be given immunity going back to the beginning of 2014? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” I’m just very interested in why it was this date. Did it have anything to do with the fact that 2014 was also the year that the NIAID or NIH began funding the Alliance for Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence grant?
1:24

Senator Ashley Moody: This is the pardon you have heard so much about. And Dr. Fauci, from what I can tell, is the only other person who got a pardon like this, I believe, who had the last name Biden. This pardon goes back to January 1, 2014. Did you talk to President Biden and ask for this pardon? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” Who did you talk to in the White House about this pardon? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” Did you specifically ask that it be dated back to the beginning of 2014? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” Did you do that so that you would be given immunity going back to the beginning of 2014? Fauci: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” I’m just very interested in why it was this date. Did it have anything to do with the fact that 2014 was also the year that the NIAID or NIH began funding the Alliance for Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence grant?

Jammles

235,071 просмотров • 8 дней назад

🚨 JUST NOW: Dr. Fauci tells anyone whose family members DIED from the vaccine to screw off, he's not answering or apologizing MORENO: Will you apologize to the family members of the people who died because they took your advice and not only got the first vaccine but the five, six other boosters that they did not need? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. MORENO: You won't apologize to the military members who Joe Biden summarily dismissed from the military for not taking the vaccine? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. MORENO: Will you apologize to the business owners that lost their business, shattered their lives, and they'll never recover? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. MORENO: Will you apologize to the moms who had to force their infant children, two, three, four year olds to put masks on, and what that did and how that traumatized those kids? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Bernie Moreno
1:45

🚨 JUST NOW: Dr. Fauci tells anyone whose family members DIED from the vaccine to screw off, he's not answering or apologizing MORENO: Will you apologize to the family members of the people who died because they took your advice and not only got the first vaccine but the five, six other boosters that they did not need? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. MORENO: You won't apologize to the military members who Joe Biden summarily dismissed from the military for not taking the vaccine? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. MORENO: Will you apologize to the business owners that lost their business, shattered their lives, and they'll never recover? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. MORENO: Will you apologize to the moms who had to force their infant children, two, three, four year olds to put masks on, and what that did and how that traumatized those kids? FAUCI: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Bernie Moreno

Eric Daugherty

99,903 просмотров • 8 дней назад

Question: “Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18?” Jeffrey Epstein: “Though I'd like to answer that question, at least today, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights”
0:34

Question: “Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18?” Jeffrey Epstein: “Though I'd like to answer that question, at least today, I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights”

Marco Foster

3,931,640 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

#SudikshaKonanki | #JoshuaRiibe was interrogated again. I have translated the interrogation for y’all. Sudiksha Konanki: Joshua Riibe Evades Key Questions with the Same Answer Eight Times Punta Cana. – Joshua Steven Riibe, the last person to see the young Sudiksha Konanki, was interviewed by the Public Ministry, and in at least eight occasions, he stated that he could not answer a question, following the advice of his lawyers. Sudiksha Konanki disappeared on the 6th of this month at the beach. She was a guest at the RIU República hotel in Punta Cana. Throughout the interview, not always consecutively, here are the eight questions he refused to answer, according to a document with his statements obtained exclusively by Noticias SIN: can we verify that everything you have said corresponds to the truth? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 2.Could you tell us what you commented to your friend Carter Joseph when he asked about the missing girl, Sudiksha Konanki? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 3.What do you think about Sudiksha’s disappearance? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 4.Did Sudiksha know how to swim or not? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” you remember if Sudiksha made any gesture or screamed while she was in the sea? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 6.Did you inform the authorities or the hotel about what happened with you and the girl on the beach? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 7.Did you tell your friend what happened with you and the girl on the beach? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” do you feel about this situation? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.”
0:27

#SudikshaKonanki | #JoshuaRiibe was interrogated again. I have translated the interrogation for y’all. Sudiksha Konanki: Joshua Riibe Evades Key Questions with the Same Answer Eight Times Punta Cana. – Joshua Steven Riibe, the last person to see the young Sudiksha Konanki, was interviewed by the Public Ministry, and in at least eight occasions, he stated that he could not answer a question, following the advice of his lawyers. Sudiksha Konanki disappeared on the 6th of this month at the beach. She was a guest at the RIU República hotel in Punta Cana. Throughout the interview, not always consecutively, here are the eight questions he refused to answer, according to a document with his statements obtained exclusively by Noticias SIN: can we verify that everything you have said corresponds to the truth? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 2.Could you tell us what you commented to your friend Carter Joseph when he asked about the missing girl, Sudiksha Konanki? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 3.What do you think about Sudiksha’s disappearance? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 4.Did Sudiksha know how to swim or not? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” you remember if Sudiksha made any gesture or screamed while she was in the sea? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 6.Did you inform the authorities or the hotel about what happened with you and the girl on the beach? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 7.Did you tell your friend what happened with you and the girl on the beach? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” do you feel about this situation? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.”

𝕏 🕵🏻‍♀️🦋L̤̮E̤̮G̤̮🅰️C̤̮Y̤̮🦋🕵🏻‍♀️ 𝕏

104,132 просмотров • 1 год назад

.Rand Paul: "In the red folder on your table is a copy of Section 192 of Title 2 of the U.S. Code...that section makes it a crime for a witness appearing under subpoena to refuse to answer any questions pertinent to the question under inquiry. Do you have that in front of you?" FAUCI: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution." Rand Paul: "Let the record record that the witness has refused to answer whether there's a folder in front of him based on his Fifth Amendment right." 😂
0:39

.Rand Paul: "In the red folder on your table is a copy of Section 192 of Title 2 of the U.S. Code...that section makes it a crime for a witness appearing under subpoena to refuse to answer any questions pertinent to the question under inquiry. Do you have that in front of you?" FAUCI: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution." Rand Paul: "Let the record record that the witness has refused to answer whether there's a folder in front of him based on his Fifth Amendment right." 😂

Daily Wire

112,391 просмотров • 8 дней назад

Q: Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18? Epstein: Though l'd like to answer that question, at least today l'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights
0:34

Q: Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18? Epstein: Though l'd like to answer that question, at least today l'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights

FactPost

30,895 просмотров • 1 год назад

BREAKING: Congresswoman Meng asks Howard Lutnick why he lied about the Epstein files, and Lutnick flat out refuses to answer the question, saying he has nothing to hide and will answer questions about Epstein some other time. “I have nothing to hide and I’m glad to answer the questions. Whatever questions you have on this topic I will be glad to answer…” What are they hiding? Why can’t he answer simple questions about Epstein?
1:24

BREAKING: Congresswoman Meng asks Howard Lutnick why he lied about the Epstein files, and Lutnick flat out refuses to answer the question, saying he has nothing to hide and will answer questions about Epstein some other time. “I have nothing to hide and I’m glad to answer the questions. Whatever questions you have on this topic I will be glad to answer…” What are they hiding? Why can’t he answer simple questions about Epstein?

Ed Krassenstein

50,810 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Rep. Beatty to Bessent after he refuses to answer a question about affordable housing: "No no. We're not gonna to do that with me. You get to hear my wrath that you refuse to answer a question under your authority, and yet you've talked about the value of housing and you're not releasing the funds."
2:35

Rep. Beatty to Bessent after he refuses to answer a question about affordable housing: "No no. We're not gonna to do that with me. You get to hear my wrath that you refuse to answer a question under your authority, and yet you've talked about the value of housing and you're not releasing the funds."

Aaron Rupar

127,683 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18? Epstein: “Though l'd like to answer that question, at least today I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights, sir.”
0:33

Sensitive content

🇺🇸 Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18? Epstein: “Though l'd like to answer that question, at least today I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights, sir.”

Lord Bebo

41,798 просмотров • 1 год назад

The Question They Didn't Want Answered - And Why It Matters Even More Today This is one of the more revealing exchanges I've had in Question Period. I asked straightforward questions about government decision-making, lobbying, and conflicts of interest involving the Premier. Instead of answers, I was met with interruptions, insults, and repeated attempts to shut down the discussion. Watch closely. Ask yourself: Why was this question so difficult to answer? And why were they so determined to prevent it from being asked? Since this exchange, Albertans have witnessed controversy after controversy involving sole-source contracts, procurement practices, government appointments, and questions of transparency and accountability. And now, AHS has been ordered by the courts to turn over documents to law enforcement. That development makes this exchange even more relevant. The details may change, but the pattern remains the same. When legitimate questions are raised, this government dodges responsibility. Too often we see deflection, obstruction, and theatrics. Question Period exists for one reason: accountability. Albertans deserve answers, not excuses. Watch this exchange and decide for yourself whether this is the standard of government Alberta deserves. #ableg #abpoli #accountability #ucp #alberta #publictrust #transparancy #abtory
4:29

The Question They Didn't Want Answered - And Why It Matters Even More Today This is one of the more revealing exchanges I've had in Question Period. I asked straightforward questions about government decision-making, lobbying, and conflicts of interest involving the Premier. Instead of answers, I was met with interruptions, insults, and repeated attempts to shut down the discussion. Watch closely. Ask yourself: Why was this question so difficult to answer? And why were they so determined to prevent it from being asked? Since this exchange, Albertans have witnessed controversy after controversy involving sole-source contracts, procurement practices, government appointments, and questions of transparency and accountability. And now, AHS has been ordered by the courts to turn over documents to law enforcement. That development makes this exchange even more relevant. The details may change, but the pattern remains the same. When legitimate questions are raised, this government dodges responsibility. Too often we see deflection, obstruction, and theatrics. Question Period exists for one reason: accountability. Albertans deserve answers, not excuses. Watch this exchange and decide for yourself whether this is the standard of government Alberta deserves. #ableg #abpoli #accountability #ucp #alberta #publictrust #transparancy #abtory

Peter Guthrie

11,084 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 BREAKING: Rand Paul announces the committee will be voting to hold Dr. Fauci in CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS after Fauci invokes the fifth amendment over 80 times This carries up to a YEAR of prison time. Paul argues that Fauci does NOT have a fifth amendment right against self-incrimination, as Biden's autopen pardon protects him. Therefore, Fauci can be COMPELLED to answer questions. PAUL: "My question was limited to the period of your pardon only. I find your objection UNSUPPORTED and DIRECT YOU to answer the question." FAUCI: *pleads fifth* PAUL: "Because you refuse to answer citing a privilege unsupported because of your pardon and after being denied to do so this committee has scheduled a vote next week on a resolution certifying your contempt"
1:27

🚨 BREAKING: Rand Paul announces the committee will be voting to hold Dr. Fauci in CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS after Fauci invokes the fifth amendment over 80 times This carries up to a YEAR of prison time. Paul argues that Fauci does NOT have a fifth amendment right against self-incrimination, as Biden's autopen pardon protects him. Therefore, Fauci can be COMPELLED to answer questions. PAUL: "My question was limited to the period of your pardon only. I find your objection UNSUPPORTED and DIRECT YOU to answer the question." FAUCI: *pleads fifth* PAUL: "Because you refuse to answer citing a privilege unsupported because of your pardon and after being denied to do so this committee has scheduled a vote next week on a resolution certifying your contempt"

Nick Sortor

1,433,107 просмотров • 8 дней назад