正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

After the 2016 election, the program's focus shifted to targeting "foreign interference" in elections. By 2020, it had morphed into something far more sinister: A government-funded operation targeting individual American voices.

295,013 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

18 条评论

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

Sec. of State Marco Rubio’s new interview just went viral. And he's NOT talking about tariffs or China. He exposed a secret $50M shadow agency inside the State Department that tried to silence Americans... Here’s what you should know (& how they tried to erase free speech): 🧵

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

It all started innocently enough 10-15 years ago. The State Department created a program to counter terrorist messaging from al-Qaida and ISIS. Who could argue with that? But here's where it gets disturbing...

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

The man running this operation? Richard Stengel – who publicly claimed: "Donald Trump talks just like a Russian spy, he talks just like a terrorist, and so do the people around him." This wasn't just talk. They had a sophisticated system to silence opposition.

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

Here's how the censorship machine worked: The State Department funded supposedly "impartial" NGOs with taxpayer money. These third-party groups then tagged American commentators and media outlets as "foreign agents." But that was just the beginning...

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

The consequences were real and devastating. These weren't just labels – they led to Americans getting deplatformed and silenced online. High-profile targets included Ben Shapiro and The Federalist. But countless everyday citizens were also caught in the dragnet.

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

Just when you think it couldn't get more shocking: Before Trump took office, they didn't shut down the unit. They simply renamed it and moved it elsewhere in the bureaucracy. A classic government shell game to avoid accountability.

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

The most disturbing part? American taxpayers were unknowingly funding this censorship apparatus. Your tax dollars were being used to silence fellow Americans for exercising their First Amendment rights.

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

Sec. Rubio's team has been quietly dismantling this system over recent months. They're documenting what happened for two critical reasons: So those harmed can prove they were targeted to ensure it never happens again.

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

But that's not the end of the story. We're now facing an even bigger threat from abroad. The European Union has become increasingly aggressive in censoring speech, including targeting Americans speaking about American issues.

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

A concrete example: When Elon Musk hosted Donald Trump on X during the election season, EU officials threatened him with penalties. This was two non-EU citizens, discussing American politics, being threatened by foreign censors. The stakes couldn't be higher.

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

Here's what's even more concerning: The foreign censorship laws in places like the EU were partly shaped by the same ecosystem partners that were funded by the State Department. It created a global censorship machine that's still operating.

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

The EU Digital Services Act now threatens Americans with fines for speech that would be protected under our First Amendment. They've already threatened a billion-dollar fine against X for "non-compliance with disinformation" standards.

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

In a stark shift from previous policy, Rubio has raised this issue directly with foreign leaders, including at a recent Oval Office meeting with the UK Prime Minister. The message: Attacks on free expression undermine one of the core values that unite Western democracies.

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

The State Department is now refocusing on pro-American messaging and protecting free speech globally. A complete reversal from the previous censorship approach that targeted Americans.

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

What's the lesson here? As Rubio put it: "Sometimes, some idea that starts out as innocuous or maybe even good intention can metastasize, becomes a weapon that can be turned into something else by someone else."

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

Karl Mehta 的头像
Karl Mehta1 年前

P.S. If you're an SMB company in the healthcare or BFSI sector… I've built an AI platform that helps you spot problems in your business before they happen. Curious which insights could save you millions? You can book a demo here, and we'll map it out:

SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple 的头像
SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple1 年前

🇺🇸 New Leadership, New Priorities! The old ways are gone. This administration must step up where others failed. 🦅 🛡️A stronger nation starts with informed citizens. Start your own cyber awareness journey with the CYBERSECURITY DICTIONARY for Everyone:

相关视频

BREAKING: NSA kept finished 2016 election-interference intel for 16 months in order to dodge the "deep state" label under Trump. A newly declassified 2020 memo from an NSA analyst drops a bombshell exposing the agency's own leadership blocked release of a long-ready report on foreign targeting of U.S. elections, including 2016 details, not because the intel was bad, but because they feared it would brand NSA as part of the "deep state." On top of this, CISA, the CIA, the NSA, DHS, and the FBI all new of the foreign threats and the vulnerabilities in our election machines, but still certified them for use anyway and kept this information from Trump and the public. NSA Deputy Director George Barnes, in a March 2020 meeting, blocked release of the fuller report on foreign election targeting that began in 2014 and included 2016 activity. The reason? Fear that putting it out in the Trump-era climate, with an acting ODNI tasked to "clean house," would destroy NSA's remaining credibility as the one "nonpartisan, objective" intel agency not yet tarred as deep state. The report had been ready for proposed release as early as December 2018. Analytic work was finished on time, yet higher-ups sat on it for 16 months. An earlier, more limited version had already gone out. Leadership, including Director Gen. Paul Nakasone, objected to releasing it "as-is" and floated a watered-down summary or restricted sharing instead, which the analyst argued would still identify members of Congress, triggering Gates Procedures, and look selective/political. Some 2016 details were judged "sensational," requiring tighter distribution; the fuller version unavoidably contextually identified Congress members, even with names removed, in the context of the 2016 Democratic field, Clinton/Sanders. Broader IC politicization showed that China analysts allegedly suppressed or hid evidence of Chinese meddling in the 2020 election from Trump, one reportedly refused to send it to "that vulgarian in the Oval Office," leading to a downplayed majority assessment versus a minority view backed by then-DNI Ratcliffe. he memo itself was part of the evidence reviewed in the 2021 Intelligence Community Ombudsman report by Barry Zulauf that alleged politicization of foreign election-interference intelligence. It was only declassified this week by the White House Government Transparency Task Force.

The SCIF

15,623 次观看 • 8 天前