Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

After watching this video I'm so curious to know some things here, having in mind contexts vary, but, my quiz is this; Is consent a one-time agreement, or can a person withdraw it at any point they feel they don't want it anymore and does withdrawal take immediate effect?...

27,293 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

14 Kommentare

Profilbild von King Slayer
King Slayervor 12 Tagen

Why is she shouting?😏

Profilbild von Tarr
Tarrvor 12 Tagen

Did anyone check her panties?

Profilbild von Basil Christian Tulesi
Basil Christian Tulesivor 12 Tagen

She has clearly not fully consented . This is a clear case of breaching ethical norms.

Profilbild von SALANO
SALANOvor 12 Tagen

It was harmless and women dont mean what they say,si unaona ata alipost😅

Profilbild von Nomad Girl Yasmin🐪
Nomad Girl Yasmin🐪vor 12 Tagen

This Was Me Before Ruto Turned Me Into A Taliban I Am Now 😂😂😂😂

Profilbild von The Kenyan Sage
The Kenyan Sagevor 12 Tagen

Ninakola 😂

Profilbild von Jamumbo
Jamumbovor 12 Tagen

Mtu akisema mshukishe, shukishe yeye inawezakuwa case kubwa sana...she is withdrawing consent.

Profilbild von Harry™️♻♺♽♲🌍
Harry™️♻♺♽♲🌍vor 12 Tagen

Next door noises 😀

Profilbild von #Rutomustgo
#Rutomustgovor 12 Tagen

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Profilbild von P.K. Ndegwa🇰🇪
P.K. Ndegwa🇰🇪vor 12 Tagen

😂

Profilbild von Amwai Gichohi
Amwai Gichohivor 12 Tagen

why was she paying??

Profilbild von Benn
Bennvor 12 Tagen

NimeExchange mind?😂

Profilbild von Thee 24th Son.ke
Thee 24th Son.kevor 12 Tagen

What is this??

Profilbild von Timothy Mutua
Timothy Mutuavor 12 Tagen

Lessons: 1. most women cannot admit accountability. 2. most women cannot be trusted.

Ähnliche Videos

Clarence Thomas: "as far as I'm concerned, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks, who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas. And it is a message that unless you kowtow to an old order, this is what will happen to you. You will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the U.S. Senate rather than hung from a tree." Full transcript: "I think that this today is a travesty. I think that it is disgusting. I think that this hearing should never occur in America. This is a case in which this sleaze, this dirt, was searched for by staffers of members of this committee. Was then leaked to the media. And this committee, and this body, validated it. And displayed it at prime time over our entire nation. How would any member on this committee, any person in this room, or any person in this country, would like sleaze said about him or her in this fashion? Or this dirt dredged up in this gossip, and these lies displayed in this manner? How would any person like it? The Supreme Court is not worth it. No job is worth it. I'm not here for that. I'm here for my name, my family, my life, and my integrity. I think something is dreadfully wrong with this country. When any person, any person in this free country, would be subjected to this. This is not a closed room. There was an FBI investigation. This is not an opportunity to talk about difficult matters privately, or in a closed environment. This is a circus. It's a national disgrace. And from my standpoint, as a black American, as far as I'm concerned, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks, who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas. And it is a message that unless you kowtow to an old order, this is what will happen to you. You will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the U.S. Senate rather than hung from a tree."

Apple Lamps

67,330 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

David Friedberg: Frontier Models are Training on Your Novel Insights as “De-Identified Data” @jason: “Should they trust any of these LLMs with their proprietary knowledge for fear of having it cribbed into a core LLM?” david friedberg: “I have had experiences where we've asked some fairly novel scientific questions, and (the AI model) identifies it as a novel insight. It's like, ‘Oh, never thought about that, interesting, blah, blah, blah.’ And then using a different account, asking the next version (of the model) later, I've now experienced this. It's like, ‘Oh, well, you could do this,’ and it actually just describes this exact thing that we had in our chat in the previous version. Now, these are a handful of anecdotal experiences, but I know the domain that we work in, and the niche of it, and the ideation of this stuff, and the novelty of this stuff, and the lack of papers being published, and so on. So I know that there isn't some new corpus of information out there that's training the new model. So all I can say at that point is that my conversation or our analyses have been used for training.” David Sacks: “Okay, this does raise a really good question. What does it mean that the model is allowed to train on unidentifiable data?” Friedberg: “Well, that's my point. So it doesn't use any of my personal information, but it can use an insight derived from our chat, which it can then say is some training data that is unrelated. But the truth is, it's actually a piece of IP that's our organization’s IP, and our engagement back and forth. We don't have any NDA or confidentiality provisions or protections with them being a service provider back to us. This is why I care a lot about open source because I don't want them having my chat logs because they can use it for training to create an IP advantage that is now diffused to the rest of the market.”

The All-In Podcast

56,501 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

This video is the one Kim Runner shared with me in July 2024 about how to tell whether you or others are NPCs. I can vividly imagine the stickiness and feel of holding an apple in my hand, the sensation of it denting when I squeeze it hard, its smell, and even its texture. Honestly, I was greatly shocked to learn that some people cannot do this. Below is the transcript of the audio.⬇️ Have you guys seen this experiment where you can not only test if the people around you are NPCs, but if you yourself are? Check this out. And if you don't know what an NPC is, basically, in the video game world, it's someone that's not being controlled by a person, just a random computer-generated thing. And in the real world, same thing, maybe just someone that's not being controlled by a soul. So I heard this experiment on a podcast, and I thought it was kind of crazy until I tried it out myself. And it has to do with apples. And you can probably use any object, but for our purposes, we're going to stick with apples. So there are going to be multiple layers to what I'm going to ask you to imagine. And depending on how far you can imagine it might just depend on if you're an NPC or not. So with this blank screen, I want you to picture a red apple here. Can you picture a red apple? If you can, great. So far, you're not an NPC. Next, I'd like you to think of that red apple, and in your mind—you can close your eyes if you need to—think of that apple as green. Can you change it to a green apple? Can you see a green apple without looking at it? Now stick with me. We're getting to the good parts here. If you can picture a red apple and then a green apple, great, but here's where a lot of people get stuck. And I'm taking away the image here. I want you to picture that green apple in your mind, and can you go in, and can you pick up that apple? Can you manipulate it? Can you move it around? Can you in your mind be holding it, and then all of a sudden it turns from green to purple? Do you have the ability to do that? Because for me, I could, no problem. I could hold that, I could throw it, I could take a bite of it, anything I wanted to do with that apple, I could do in my mind. But the shocking part was, as I was listening to this on the podcast, one person, they were stuck. They couldn't do anything but change colors. They couldn't grab it, they couldn't manipulate it. It was stuck there. One person couldn't even change colors of the apple. But I didn't believe this until I tried it on my wife. And my wife, she could change the color—she could go green and red—but she didn't have the ability to manipulate that apple. She couldn't grab that apple, she couldn't throw that apple. I'm juggling this apple, I'm doing all sorts of things with it, but hers is just a stuck image. And I thought that was nuts. I thought just because I had the ability to manipulate things in my mind and control things, that everybody did, but clearly that's not the case. And this leads me down the path of maybe this is why some people can't grasp the topics or the understanding of not living where we've been told we live our entire lives, because they can't visualize it, they can't think outside the green and red apple. Now, I'm not actually saying my wife is an NPC, but I do think our brains operate differently. I do think some are more right, some are more left, some are right down the middle, and some just don't really choose to think. But try it out, guys, because I found it fascinating, and I would love to hear how you did during this little experiment. Put it in the comments, test it on the people around you, and let me know, cause I want to know if I'm in the majority or if I'm in the minority. But something tells me I might be in the minority. But guys, as always, this was all for entertainment purposes. I don't really think my wife is an NPC... (Female voice) Tyler, can you come here?

kouji 🇯🇵

102,939 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen