Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

CAMPUS CONTROVERSY: College student outraged after discovering her assigned textbook labels Christianity as a “white supremacist” group: “The book reiterated that Christianity is a U.S.-based white supremacist group, which I was mind blown because the textbook did not describe any other identities besides Christianity.” “The book had underlying propaganda,...

1,315,295 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

“You can't get to Christian nationalism from the specific articulations of state-supported Christianity in the early Republic, because they do not want the state making determinations about what Christianity is.” — Miles Smith IV (Miles Smith IV) “In the early Republic, across the board, there is a real sense that we do not want Christianity associated with the idea of an American nation.” “Christianity was something other than the government.” “Our idea — especially insofar as people on the right articulate what gets called Christian nationalism — is an anachronism. You can only think of Christian nationalism as downstream from what we might historically call liberal Protestant assumptions. And I'm not saying all of those liberal Protestant assumptions are heretical per se.” “You can't get to Christian nationalism from the specific articulations of state-supported Christianity in the early Republic, because they do not want the state making determinations about what Christianity is. “Think of it this way: they're happy with the church telling them what Christianity is, but they don't want the state telling the church what Christianity is.” “In that sense, there's actually a pretty capacious place for ecclesiastical influence in the early Republic. I think people see that and say, "See, that's Christian nationalism." No — I think what's happening now is that we want the government to do the leading on that.” “When historically, at least in the United States, it was churchmen, educational institutions, and civic celebrations that aren’t even necessarily state-supported that were doing that. In the early Republic, there were many people speaking to the state. Now what we tend to want is actual politicians and government officers doing this.” Watch: Listen:

Sola Media

25,698 views • 2 months ago

For those who don't know my story and are too lazy to look it up: I don't have a silo. I was a leftist and a feminist for my entire life. Like basically from the time I was a kid until about 35. I left the silo. To seek truth. I was punished viciously for doing so. I lost money, support, safety, and subscribers. I took a risk. Because comfort is not my mo. That's not why I became a writer, journalist, or podcaster. I'm here to learn. Those who remained in the silo want very much to believe that the opposite is true. They don't want to hear that people leave their tribe because they realized they had been wrong and limited in their view. It upsets them to see people leaving the cult and simply speaking plainly and truthfully—to ask inconvenient questions—to admit they don't know. Those who leave cults are always punished, threatened, and ostracized in this way because it means others might see it as an option too—they might actually start asking questions as well! They might realize that they too can leave and start thinking independently. This is why leftists and feminists continue to try to discredit me, pretend I've lost my mind, accuse me of having "sold out" (for what lol—it ain't money!), of being a grifter (I am the worst grifter in the world, if this is true), or of being brainwashed. On some level I think they know none of this is true, they just don't want to face the possibility they might be the misguided ones, the ones who aren't thinking or questions, and the ones who are in fact the bad guys.

Meghan Murphy

26,312 views • 1 month ago