Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

#AgaRuhullah’s Art. 370 conference? What has it achieved? An inclusive interview with Aga Sahib today. ‘No compromise on internal autonomy; NC discourages people from discussing Art. 370; other political parties are tested and not serious about people’s rights; I will advocate even if NC parts ways with me and...

19,287 просмотров • 12 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

HCM Omar Abdullah is compromising the dignity of the J&K state - which once was strong enough that if the PM of the country had to visit J&K, Visa was necessary - by going out of his way to please & bow to the BJP-led centre. He himself is disempowering the "The chair of the CM of J&K" Has Mr. Omar Abdullah forgot the way NC managed a campaign in which they presented BJP as the biggest possible threat for J&K? Now, within 3 months, what has changed in J&K that NC started singing a different tune, praising the BJP & being totally subservient to the centre? Mobilizing people on radical grounds during elections to gain power, only to completely abandon those grounds, leads to widespread disillusionment with the democratic process itself. It often leads to the feeling of betrayal among masses which eventually makes people reactionary. Elections are not a farce. The will of the people is not a joke. Democracy should not leave people feeling resentful as if they’ve been conned by the electoral process. Our politicians need to understand that repeatedly betraying public sentiment not only erodes trust but also alienates people from democratic participation.l The National Conference (NC) has mastered the art of promoting the rhetoric of Kashmiri dignity & autonomy, using religious & cultural identity to emotionally charge the people & win elections, only to betray those very sentiments at critical moments. Time and again, they have positioned themselves as the defenders of Kashmir’s rights, only to compromise when it suits their power calculus. This pattern of emotional exploitation, followed by betrayal, not only makes the NC's collaboration with the Centre the cheapest & most insincere in Kashmir’s political history but also makes people feel that democratic process is not a solution. History has been repeating itself too often in Kashmir when it comes to ruling parties.

Vikas Amin

23,807 просмотров • 1 год назад

Nick Fuentes explains why loyalty to politicians is conditional and why taking your own side is the only leverage we have left. “I’m fighting for America First. And if Trump will be America First, then we’re with Trump. If he’s not, then we’re not…our loyalty actually comes with a price tag.” “I don’t have a jersey on. I’m not under a contract. I’m not being paid under the table by these people…give us something tangible. We have a price. Just like Elon Musk has an ask, just like Miriam Adelson has an ask, we have an ask as well.” “That’s the difference between people that are serious and people that are being strung along and turned out like political whores.” “You’re telling me Republicans are going to lose? That sounds like a you problem…you had your chance…they didn’t do any of it.” “I need you to feel this. I need you to feel it in your bones. I need you to feel it in your heart. You have been betrayed. This is treachery…things are not going well for you. It is going well for them.” “It’s not OK and things need to change now. And they need to understand: if things don’t change now? Then we are ready to join them. We will hold their hand and we will walk into oblivion together. We will walk you down that road.” “I got off the hamster wheel. I stopped playing that a long time ago. I endorse no one, yet. You give me something. You fight for me. You promise me something… OK, now we’ll talk.”

Fractured Light

49,186 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

PRESS STATEMENT In the last 24 hours, social media has exploded over my interview with Mehdi Hassan, albeit with varied opinions. Let me set the record straight. When I signed on to the privileged job granted to me by Mr. President, I was well aware of its implications. Selling ice cream, looking fine, and seeking the praises of men were never part of it. Some of the fiercest critics of my interview can not even stand local TV anchors. But the task of promoting and defending the President and his administration is what I do with ease and joy. I am prepared to appear before any interviewer, anywhere in the world, any day and at any time, to defend this government and its policies. I have never, and will never, subscribe to ducking or dodging interviews on matters that concern promoting and defending the administration I was appointed to serve. It is the least of what is required of me. Head to Head contacted me requesting an interview, stating that they wanted to challenge our government on security, the economy, and corruption. Nowhere in our almost six months of communication did they mention that they were going to challenge my past. If that had been their plan, ethically and professionally, they were supposed to inform me so I could prepare my response. But that’s okay, ethically, that is on them, not on me. I refused to swallow the pill of Mehdi’s “opposition research-style journalism,” and even today, if you carefully compare what he read as quotes from organisations and groups, you will see that many were inaccurate and some were outright fake news. But I will leave that for another day. As for what I said about President Tinubu in the past, I am glad those were things I said when I was in the opposition saddle with such zeal. It is all politics. Half of Donald Trump’s cabinet is made up of people who once spoke against him, and quite a number of people in our own cabinet also spoke against President Tinubu in the past. Those things do not bother him if you care to know. The majority of the naysayers are members of the opposition and their sympathisers. It does not bother me one bit. Their temporary excitement over the interview has not lasted and will not last, because it does not take away their obvious problem of lack of vision, mission in conducting and managing a political party; yet they seek to manage Nigeria. Clearly they have no path to victory and no alternative policies or program for the Nigerian people. And if they say they do, they can as well go to head to head and be interrogated on that; as the saying in Hausa goes “Ga fili Ga doki” I conclude by thanking the many Nigerians and non-Nigerians who sent in their commendations over my brave defence of our government in an interview where the anchor would hardly let you answer a question unless it suited his narrative. I still have admiration and respect for Mehdi Hassan as arguably the best debater on the planet. I look forward to part two of the Head to Head interview, and I am glad that by then questions about my past will no longer be news so that we can focus on our administration’s policies, programs and what we have achieved so far. Stay tuned. – D.H Bwala Special Adviser to President on Media and Policy Communication (State House) Saturday March 7, 2026

D. H Bwala

1,485,526 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад