Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Age verification CANNOT work. It will NEVER work because humans do not look different one day before and after their 16th birthday.👀 Surely this is obvious? The Under 16 social media bill is a trap. Regardless of what the legislation says, governments know platforms will have to enact Digital...

42,220 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 37

Фото профиля Mick Hill
Mick Hill10 месяцев назад

If they stop me accessing my accounts and payments to the bank and utilities I’ll sue the government, they have no right whatsoever to control me.

Фото профиля AnUnimportantPerson
AnUnimportantPerson10 месяцев назад

It is not about protecting young people, it's about controlling the knowledge the people can have.

Фото профиля Luke Amott🇦🇺🐾🐶
Luke Amott🇦🇺🐾🐶10 месяцев назад

I don’t believe the social media ban will work but I also don’t believe in the conspiracy theories that people on in this platform are trying to push. You’re trying to push the same conspiracy theories as digital ID which is not a surveillance tool. It’s actually quite helpful if you bothered to read the information and understand how it works but you keep pushing all your conspiracy theories and bullshit and lies

Фото профиля Rob N Hood
Rob N Hood10 месяцев назад

A burka is ageless.

Фото профиля The Old and Unimproved Dave 🦘
The Old and Unimproved Dave 🦘10 месяцев назад

Consider... Albanese et al are challenging the ingenuity of Musk et al. Hmmm... wonder where a man can get a bet down on the outcome?

Фото профиля #VoteFreedom - anthmusic🎶🎼🤙
#VoteFreedom - anthmusic🎶🎼🤙10 месяцев назад

its the next step in the digital prison being installed around us while we sleepwalk right into it

Фото профиля Nicky Boy
Nicky Boy10 месяцев назад

I’m about to dump the internet and hit the gym I’m not doing this shit

Фото профиля Peter Visser
Peter Visser10 месяцев назад

Why have these right wing nut jobs decided that yankee billionaires that own social media companies are going to be our overlords If Australia people have to obey Australia laws , if they face prosecution and consequences for not doing so, why not yankee billionaires?

Фото профиля roseg
roseg10 месяцев назад

Ten year old girls in makeup can look 25. 25 year old men can look 14. This isn’t about protecting children.

Фото профиля Lord DropBear
Lord DropBear10 месяцев назад

Meanwhile on the 27th...

Фото профиля Ron C
Ron C10 месяцев назад

4 page lift out in the Herald Sun today about protecting the kids from social media FFS 🤦

Фото профиля Superduke
Superduke10 месяцев назад

Pedos also don`t like this regulation.

Фото профиля 🇦🇺MY MOM SAID I'M COOL
🇦🇺MY MOM SAID I'M COOL10 месяцев назад

You do understand age verification doesn't just look at your face it looks at your habits online etc as well

Фото профиля MostlyVV
MostlyVV10 месяцев назад

They are using protecting children to deploy age verification so that they can censor adults and prevent anonymous usage of the internet. This much is obvious and it has been deployed in several countries using this same excuse at the same time.

Фото профиля Gunjaparty
Gunjaparty10 месяцев назад

SM companies aren’t being forced to use facial recognition to prove age. Completely up to SM HOW they determine age of user. What ID did you provide for a Blue Tick on X?

Фото профиля Jason Morahan
Jason Morahan10 месяцев назад

Cunt Labor noticed the way witchcraft laws like "hate speech," literally utterances are causally a criminal harm just like witches' spells, gained support from scumbags that they decided to just declare themselves magical rulers who know magical ways to charge people with crimes.

Фото профиля GRND4D
GRND4D10 месяцев назад

You're right, when I was kid, me and my mates did dodgy stuff so we could buy booze, ciggies, and bet on the horses and even drive cars. And because we got away with that, there should be no laws against those things. You fucking idiot.

Фото профиля Alexandra Marshall
Alexandra Marshall10 месяцев назад

Imagine trying to equate free speech to buying booze, smoking, and betting. A better comparison would be 'some kids swear when they're out in public therefore no children should be allowed outside'.

Фото профиля GRND4D
GRND4D10 месяцев назад

Imagine equating free speech to adults and bullies having anonymous access to children online. Children have free speech. Please explain to me what child will lose their free speech?

Фото профиля adriaan23
adriaan2310 месяцев назад

An excuse for control. Just look at China.

Фото профиля Xanadu 🇦🇺
Xanadu 🇦🇺10 месяцев назад

I showed my govt issued licence to get my phone in the first place. 🤔

Фото профиля Paul
Paul10 месяцев назад

Socialism dost like freedoms of any kind it like dictatorship control and the people compliance to the socialists ways,the only freedoms the man/woman of socialism care about is theirs & family members freedoms, but never any body else’s, so live like North Korea people do or not

Фото профиля dangermouse
dangermouse10 месяцев назад

Yes, but porn sites are ok, says it all.

Фото профиля Kim White
Kim White10 месяцев назад

Will you please STFU!!!

Фото профиля Daraj1971
Daraj197110 месяцев назад

Maybe parents could do what there meant to be doing, parenting. There's plenty of things in place and have been for a very long time for parents to use. But no, everybody else has to raise their kids again

Фото профиля Kylie Silvia (m0mmak)
Kylie Silvia (m0mmak)10 месяцев назад

Are you worried it will read you as older than you are or that it might think you’re under 16. Na that would be silly it will probably be older.

Фото профиля Peter Albonightmare
Peter Albonightmare10 месяцев назад

Good work Alexandra.

Фото профиля Stephen Neil
Stephen Neil10 месяцев назад

We’re living in an Orwellian Police State

Фото профиля Craig Grove
Craig Grove10 месяцев назад

My 17 yr old autistic daughter had to verify her age with photo on Roblox it verified her age between 13-15 all she has with photo on card is student id that didn't scan plus In profile charged her DOB from 2008 to 2012 how is it allowed to change the DOB without your consent

Фото профиля United Peaceful Noncompliance ⛓️
United Peaceful Noncompliance ⛓️10 месяцев назад

Parents could maybe open accounts now for their kids to use later so they don’t have to give up ID to join later..?

Фото профиля Hammo 🇦🇺
Hammo 🇦🇺10 месяцев назад

Good friend of ours is in her early 30s, she’s a Mum of 2, she regularly gets asked for ID in pubs.

Фото профиля mick
mick10 месяцев назад

🤣🤣🤣Literally the dumbest take I've seen in this whole age ban commentary. FFS

Фото профиля Jon Connor
Jon Connor10 месяцев назад

Its internet control and suppression by the backdoor- just get a vpn until the NWO is demolished

Фото профиля $!m0n
$!m0n10 месяцев назад

It's all here #socialmediaban @AussieOverLawd

Фото профиля FedSlopCrockPot
FedSlopCrockPot10 месяцев назад

I hope all of the platforms just geoblock the entirety of Australia...

Фото профиля Allovrrovr
Allovrrovr10 месяцев назад

Absolutely, all about revenue raising. Won't be much good though when Trump takes it all off them with his new monetary plan.

Фото профиля MY HEAD HURTS
MY HEAD HURTS10 месяцев назад

This is not a conspiracy theory….

Похожие видео

Well said Senator Antic, but the only problem is that you are member of the Liberal Party and the Liberal Party supports Albanese’s plan to force all Australia have some form of government issued or biometric digital ID to log on to the internet. Senator ANTIC (South Australia) (16:46): I think we all want to see our children protected from harm online, but what's the real cost of a social media ban for children? Firstly, it's not clear to me how an age-specific ban could actually be in force short of requiring all Australians to prove their identity, and therefore their age, before actually using their social media accounts. How would it be done? The only reliable methods that are likely to work are those which require social media accounts to be linked to either a government certified ID, digital ID or biometric data. Immediately, we've gone from talking about a law protecting children under 16 from online harm to proposals potentially requiring all Australians to submit personal identification as a condition of using social media. This is how concerns over safety—in this case, children's safety—convince people to hand over their freedom, to hand over their personal information. Of course, this has nothing to do with the fact that a generation of young people are starting to unpick the lies of the corporate media online, does it? Well, of course it does! What a great way to ensure that young people only get a left-wing government message approved to them via their devices. Frankly, the words 'ban' and 'media' should never exist in a sentence together, and parents should always be in charge of what their children watch and what their children watch online.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

28,757 просмотров • 1 год назад

Social media ban or big brother control? The government, with support of the Liberals, is proposing a ban on children under 16 accessing social media, justifying the measure by claiming it’s "popular." Oh, really? It’s ironic that the same parties that accuse One Nation of populism are now pushing a measure not because it’s practical, but simply because it’s supposedly popular. A true conservative party Peter Dutton would support parents to supervise their own children in their own homes. A true conservative, Mr Dutton, would not be promoting big government replacing parents. The eGovernment is also trialling age-assurance technology, which uses facial scans of every social media user to confirm they are over 16. If there’s any doubt, the system will cross-check the person’s Digital ID to ensure it matches. In addition to facial scans, the "Assurance AI" will monitor keystrokes, audio patterns and "other measures" to determine the user’s age. By now you may conclude, as I did, that enforcing a social media age limit of 16 would require verifying everyone’s age using the device camera and their Digital ID—which everyone would be forced to have. So much for Digital ID being voluntary. Even adults will need one to continue using social media. Even more alarming is the fact that conversations would be monitored for signs of age, yet what happens to the voice prints and keystroke logs this system collects? To make this work, cameras on devices would need to run constantly to ensure a new user hasn’t hopped on to an existing computer session. This means cameras would always be on, capturing everything - video and audio – that is happening in the room. This creates a perfect scenario for hackers to access the feed. In the unlikely event they can actually make this work, children would move to other platforms that are less regulated, less safe and more prone to child exploitation. One Nation opposes this legislation. The best people to monitor and regulate children’s internet use are parents—not a Big Brother government.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

65,540 просмотров • 1 год назад

Ireland to be the testing ground in Europe for Chinese-style mandatory Digital ID to access social media. Tánaiste Simon Harris trying to push the narrative that the government's plan to link Digital ID to social media access is necessary to protect the welfare of children. Any thinking person knows the reality is that this is about absolute control and surveillance of every aspect of your life. By connecting social media to Digital ID means that every web page access could be traced back to a specific holder of a Public Services Card in Ireland. This is the start of a digital prison. The EU is in the process of implementing a European Central Bank digital euro. If we go along with this we will be transposed into a CBDC Digital ID cashless society whereby your every financial transaction will be controlled, monitored, traced and tracked. The plan by the Irish government to link Digital ID to access social media is already underway. Social media platforms in Ireland have been contacted by the government to take part in a pilot to be rolled out in March and the government have already announced they intend to put in place legislation later this year to get their dystopian plans over the line. We must RESIST this sinister plan to get mandatory Digital ID through the back door. What is to stop successive governments from implementing a social credit system if you say something online that is against the narrative of the establishment?. Your social welfare benefits and right to work could be restricted by this massive government overreach, if you step out of line. If we do not RESIST this with all our might we face the end of humanity as we know it. A digital prison surveillance planet whereby the global corporations, governments and Bankers have complete control over every aspect of our lives. It is up to us to push back against these draconian plans with all our might. We defeated the government's Referendum. We staved off the controversial Hate Speech 'thought police' Bill. We secured the highest ever spoilt votes in Irish history and, indeed, in Europe. We CAN defeat this attack on our fundamental rights and freedoms IF we join as a cohesive force against the government's plans for a Chinese-style dystopian surveillance society. We owe it to future generations to push back with all our might. #NoDigitalID

Lawyers For Justice Ireland

35,777 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

People power 1 Government stupidity 0 “Social media companies will not need to verify the age of every user or meet a minimum standard for how many teenagers they boot off their platforms, with the federal government confirming a lighter-touch approach to enforcing its under-16 ban. While the platforms must satisfy the eSafety watchdog that they have taken "reasonable steps" to remove the accounts of those aged under 16, there will be no legally-enforceable standard for accuracy. As expected, platforms will not be told which technology to use for age screening, but will need to ensure their policies are transparent and consistent, and that there is a process for disputes.” ••••••••••••••••••••••• Thanks to Dr Joanne Orlando for this footage. This Digital ID thought bubble gets dumber and dumber. Digital ID is now not going to be enforced for every user and instead to be subject to random spot checks. So much for protecting the children! Furthermore the social media companies are no longer going to be subject to legally enforceable standards. The whole process is a waste of time and just another clumsy attempt at government overreach. As I pointed out last year disadvantaged children (see clip in comments) are going to lose access to their friends on social media that they rely on as they can’t see them physically every day. In other words good people are going to be punished through bad legislation. I also pointed out that children could use VPNs and will find other ways to bypass surveillance. As it stands you could drive a truck through this poorly thought out plan. It’s just another reason to get rid of Albanese and his inept administration. To help us do it please sign up to today.

Gerard Rennick

47,597 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад