正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Age verification CANNOT work. It will NEVER work because humans do not look different one day before and after their 16th birthday.👀 Surely this is obvious? The Under 16 social media bill is a trap. Regardless of what the legislation says, governments know platforms will have to enact Digital... ID for customers locked out of their accounts. Imagine a if a bar was fined for serving alcohol to children - but wasn't allowed to prove the age of a customer to a legal satisfaction. That's what's happening. It is an excuse - nothing more - to rip money out of social media companies for 'non-compliance' while forcing a shroud of digital surveillance over citizens. Alexander Hatzikalimnios joins Spectator TV Australiashow more

Alexandra Marshall

113,082 subscribers

42,220 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

37 条评论

Mick Hill 的头像

Mick Hill10 个月前

If they stop me accessing my accounts and payments to the bank and utilities I’ll sue the government, they have no right whatsoever to control me.

AnUnimportantPerson 的头像

AnUnimportantPerson10 个月前

It is not about protecting young people, it's about controlling the knowledge the people can have.

Luke Amott🇦🇺🐾🐶 的头像

Luke Amott🇦🇺🐾🐶10 个月前

I don’t believe the social media ban will work but I also don’t believe in the conspiracy theories that people on in this platform are trying to push. You’re trying to push the same conspiracy theories as digital ID which is not a surveillance tool. It’s actually quite helpful if you bothered to read the information and understand how it works but you keep pushing all your conspiracy theories and bullshit and lies

Rob N Hood 的头像

Rob N Hood10 个月前

A burka is ageless.

The Old and Unimproved Dave 🦘 的头像

The Old and Unimproved Dave 🦘10 个月前

Consider... Albanese et al are challenging the ingenuity of Musk et al. Hmmm... wonder where a man can get a bet down on the outcome?

#VoteFreedom - anthmusic🎶🎼🤙 的头像

#VoteFreedom - anthmusic🎶🎼🤙10 个月前

its the next step in the digital prison being installed around us while we sleepwalk right into it

Nicky Boy 的头像

Nicky Boy10 个月前

I’m about to dump the internet and hit the gym I’m not doing this shit

Peter Visser 的头像

Peter Visser10 个月前

Why have these right wing nut jobs decided that yankee billionaires that own social media companies are going to be our overlords If Australia people have to obey Australia laws , if they face prosecution and consequences for not doing so, why not yankee billionaires?

roseg 的头像

roseg10 个月前

Ten year old girls in makeup can look 25. 25 year old men can look 14. This isn’t about protecting children.

Lord DropBear 的头像

Lord DropBear10 个月前

Meanwhile on the 27th...

Ron C 的头像

Ron C10 个月前

4 page lift out in the Herald Sun today about protecting the kids from social media FFS 🤦

Superduke 的头像

Superduke10 个月前

Pedos also don`t like this regulation.

🇦🇺MY MOM SAID I'M COOL 的头像

🇦🇺MY MOM SAID I'M COOL10 个月前

You do understand age verification doesn't just look at your face it looks at your habits online etc as well

MostlyVV 的头像

MostlyVV10 个月前

They are using protecting children to deploy age verification so that they can censor adults and prevent anonymous usage of the internet. This much is obvious and it has been deployed in several countries using this same excuse at the same time.

Gunjaparty 的头像

Gunjaparty10 个月前

SM companies aren’t being forced to use facial recognition to prove age. Completely up to SM HOW they determine age of user. What ID did you provide for a Blue Tick on X?

Jason Morahan 的头像

Jason Morahan10 个月前

Cunt Labor noticed the way witchcraft laws like "hate speech," literally utterances are causally a criminal harm just like witches' spells, gained support from scumbags that they decided to just declare themselves magical rulers who know magical ways to charge people with crimes.

GRND4D 的头像

GRND4D10 个月前

You're right, when I was kid, me and my mates did dodgy stuff so we could buy booze, ciggies, and bet on the horses and even drive cars. And because we got away with that, there should be no laws against those things. You fucking idiot.

Alexandra Marshall 的头像

Alexandra Marshall10 个月前

Imagine trying to equate free speech to buying booze, smoking, and betting. A better comparison would be 'some kids swear when they're out in public therefore no children should be allowed outside'.

GRND4D 的头像

GRND4D10 个月前

Imagine equating free speech to adults and bullies having anonymous access to children online. Children have free speech. Please explain to me what child will lose their free speech?

adriaan23 的头像

adriaan2310 个月前

An excuse for control. Just look at China.

Xanadu 🇦🇺 的头像

Xanadu 🇦🇺10 个月前

I showed my govt issued licence to get my phone in the first place. 🤔

Paul 的头像

Paul10 个月前

Socialism dost like freedoms of any kind it like dictatorship control and the people compliance to the socialists ways,the only freedoms the man/woman of socialism care about is theirs & family members freedoms, but never any body else’s, so live like North Korea people do or not

dangermouse 的头像

dangermouse10 个月前

Yes, but porn sites are ok, says it all.

Kim White 的头像

Kim White10 个月前

Will you please STFU!!!

Daraj1971 的头像

Daraj197110 个月前

Maybe parents could do what there meant to be doing, parenting. There's plenty of things in place and have been for a very long time for parents to use. But no, everybody else has to raise their kids again

Kylie Silvia (m0mmak) 的头像

Kylie Silvia (m0mmak)10 个月前

Are you worried it will read you as older than you are or that it might think you’re under 16. Na that would be silly it will probably be older.

Peter Albonightmare 的头像

Peter Albonightmare10 个月前

Good work Alexandra.

Stephen Neil 的头像

Stephen Neil10 个月前

We’re living in an Orwellian Police State

Craig Grove 的头像

Craig Grove10 个月前

My 17 yr old autistic daughter had to verify her age with photo on Roblox it verified her age between 13-15 all she has with photo on card is student id that didn't scan plus In profile charged her DOB from 2008 to 2012 how is it allowed to change the DOB without your consent

United Peaceful Noncompliance ⛓️ 的头像

United Peaceful Noncompliance ⛓️10 个月前

Parents could maybe open accounts now for their kids to use later so they don’t have to give up ID to join later..?

Hammo 🇦🇺 的头像

Hammo 🇦🇺10 个月前

Good friend of ours is in her early 30s, she’s a Mum of 2, she regularly gets asked for ID in pubs.

mick 的头像

mick10 个月前

🤣🤣🤣Literally the dumbest take I've seen in this whole age ban commentary. FFS

Jon Connor 的头像

Jon Connor10 个月前

Its internet control and suppression by the backdoor- just get a vpn until the NWO is demolished

$!m0n 的头像

$!m0n10 个月前

It's all here #socialmediaban @AussieOverLawd

FedSlopCrockPot 的头像

FedSlopCrockPot10 个月前

I hope all of the platforms just geoblock the entirety of Australia...

Allovrrovr 的头像

Allovrrovr10 个月前

Absolutely, all about revenue raising. Won't be much good though when Trump takes it all off them with his new monetary plan.

MY HEAD HURTS 的头像

MY HEAD HURTS10 个月前

This is not a conspiracy theory….

相关视频

"Age restrictions on social media have nothing to do with child safety. It will require all citizens to have their ID checked by the government as a gateway to social media. Gateways, once established, can be closed or locked. They can be monitored and controlled. They are turning Digital ID into a passport for free speech ... to protect children? Come on..." Follow ADH TV & The Spectator Australia

"Age restrictions on social media have nothing to do with child safety. It will require all citizens to have their ID checked by the government as a gateway to social media. Gateways, once established, can be closed or locked. They can be monitored and controlled. They are turning Digital ID into a passport for free speech ... to protect children? Come on..." Follow ADH TV & The Spectator Australia

Alexandra Marshall

52,455 次观看 • 1 年前

Ursula von der Leyen announced yesterday that the EU will introduce a new mandatory EU age verification app for social media. The new law proposal will be presented after the summer. People creating new social media accounts will have to prove that they are above a certain age as the plans are to introduce social media bans for young people. Users will need a passport, ID card or digital ID to generate “over X age” proofs for platforms. For now, it seems that it will target new accounts but some are also pushing for retroactive ID requirement to verify already existing social media accounts.

Ursula von der Leyen announced yesterday that the EU will introduce a new mandatory EU age verification app for social media. The new law proposal will be presented after the summer. People creating new social media accounts will have to prove that they are above a certain age as the plans are to introduce social media bans for young people. Users will need a passport, ID card or digital ID to generate “over X age” proofs for platforms. For now, it seems that it will target new accounts but some are also pushing for retroactive ID requirement to verify already existing social media accounts.

Visegrád 24

142,106 次观看 • 3 个月前

In a world-leading policy initiative, Australia is set to ban social media for children under the age of 16

In a world-leading policy initiative, Australia is set to ban social media for children under the age of 16

Reuters

47,518 次观看 • 1 年前

Well said Senator Antic, but the only problem is that you are member of the Liberal Party and the Liberal Party supports Albanese’s plan to force all Australia have some form of government issued or biometric digital ID to log on to the internet. Senator ANTIC (South Australia) (16:46): I think we all want to see our children protected from harm online, but what's the real cost of a social media ban for children? Firstly, it's not clear to me how an age-specific ban could actually be in force short of requiring all Australians to prove their identity, and therefore their age, before actually using their social media accounts. How would it be done? The only reliable methods that are likely to work are those which require social media accounts to be linked to either a government certified ID, digital ID or biometric data. Immediately, we've gone from talking about a law protecting children under 16 from online harm to proposals potentially requiring all Australians to submit personal identification as a condition of using social media. This is how concerns over safety—in this case, children's safety—convince people to hand over their freedom, to hand over their personal information. Of course, this has nothing to do with the fact that a generation of young people are starting to unpick the lies of the corporate media online, does it? Well, of course it does! What a great way to ensure that young people only get a left-wing government message approved to them via their devices. Frankly, the words 'ban' and 'media' should never exist in a sentence together, and parents should always be in charge of what their children watch and what their children watch online.

Well said Senator Antic, but the only problem is that you are member of the Liberal Party and the Liberal Party supports Albanese’s plan to force all Australia have some form of government issued or biometric digital ID to log on to the internet. Senator ANTIC (South Australia) (16:46): I think we all want to see our children protected from harm online, but what's the real cost of a social media ban for children? Firstly, it's not clear to me how an age-specific ban could actually be in force short of requiring all Australians to prove their identity, and therefore their age, before actually using their social media accounts. How would it be done? The only reliable methods that are likely to work are those which require social media accounts to be linked to either a government certified ID, digital ID or biometric data. Immediately, we've gone from talking about a law protecting children under 16 from online harm to proposals potentially requiring all Australians to submit personal identification as a condition of using social media. This is how concerns over safety—in this case, children's safety—convince people to hand over their freedom, to hand over their personal information. Of course, this has nothing to do with the fact that a generation of young people are starting to unpick the lies of the corporate media online, does it? Well, of course it does! What a great way to ensure that young people only get a left-wing government message approved to them via their devices. Frankly, the words 'ban' and 'media' should never exist in a sentence together, and parents should always be in charge of what their children watch and what their children watch online.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

28,757 次观看 • 1 年前

BREAKING: This is the moment Australia made it illegal for anyone under 16 to use social media. All Australians will have to verify their age to use social media.

BREAKING: This is the moment Australia made it illegal for anyone under 16 to use social media. All Australians will have to verify their age to use social media.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

145,656 次观看 • 1 年前

The social media ban for under 16 year olds will likely involve EVERY person in Australia having to provide biometric scans of their face every time they want to use their social media. The Australian government has been trialling age assurance tests which provides an age estimate from a persons face scan. Notice how they are using the “it’s for the safety of our children” excuse when we all know this is just another step towards a digital dystopia!

The social media ban for under 16 year olds will likely involve EVERY person in Australia having to provide biometric scans of their face every time they want to use their social media. The Australian government has been trialling age assurance tests which provides an age estimate from a persons face scan. Notice how they are using the “it’s for the safety of our children” excuse when we all know this is just another step towards a digital dystopia!

Miss Madeleine

105,247 次观看 • 1 年前

This is getting really CREEPY Over 14 countries, France, The UK, Australia, the UAE etc, Have all introduced, within a few months of eachother, a carbon copy of the social media ban for those under 16. All of them require id verification in order to prove your age. It doesn’t make sense that so many independent jurisdiction would emulate legislation and that, so quickly. This isn’t organic. This isn’t electorate driven. This is not how sovereign nations work. At this point, there is no coincidence what so ever. It can only be explain by some form of coordinated effort. Which begs the question… by WHO? The why however is simple. Traditional media, is dwindling. GenZ gets their news from Social media. Millennials, a mix of digital sources like social media and podcasts. Anonymity also has to be crushed (hence ID verification) The ideological capture must continue and losing grip on the narrative cannot be allowed. This is painfully obvious. The internet was supposed to democratise information. But its very quickly being turned into a MASSIVE psyop.

This is getting really CREEPY Over 14 countries, France, The UK, Australia, the UAE etc, Have all introduced, within a few months of eachother, a carbon copy of the social media ban for those under 16. All of them require id verification in order to prove your age. It doesn’t make sense that so many independent jurisdiction would emulate legislation and that, so quickly. This isn’t organic. This isn’t electorate driven. This is not how sovereign nations work. At this point, there is no coincidence what so ever. It can only be explain by some form of coordinated effort. Which begs the question… by WHO? The why however is simple. Traditional media, is dwindling. GenZ gets their news from Social media. Millennials, a mix of digital sources like social media and podcasts. Anonymity also has to be crushed (hence ID verification) The ideological capture must continue and losing grip on the narrative cannot be allowed. This is painfully obvious. The internet was supposed to democratise information. But its very quickly being turned into a MASSIVE psyop.

Elliot Daigneault

126,112 次观看 • 4 个月前

Governments are using under-16 social media bans as a pretext to roll out mandatory digital ID for everybody, warns human rights campaigner Reggie Littlejohn. Despite the framing of age verification infrastructure as an innocent child protection measure, in practice the system forces everyone over 16 to prove their identity with a digital ID. Once in place, digital ID soon becomes a requirement for access to banking, government services, travel, financial transactions, and even voting—enabling authorities to shut down dissenting voices.

Governments are using under-16 social media bans as a pretext to roll out mandatory digital ID for everybody, warns human rights campaigner Reggie Littlejohn. Despite the framing of age verification infrastructure as an innocent child protection measure, in practice the system forces everyone over 16 to prove their identity with a digital ID. Once in place, digital ID soon becomes a requirement for access to banking, government services, travel, financial transactions, and even voting—enabling authorities to shut down dissenting voices.

Wide Awake Media

35,918 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚩🚩Please read sign this petition asking for a FULL public consultation on digital ID to stop authoritarianist over reach. One only has to see what is happening in the UK, and soon Australia (which rolls out age verification in December) and multiple other countries to realise this has nothing to do with keeping children safe, but everything to do with control of what you do, what you say and eventually over sight of every aspect of your life. The bureaucrats and the Govt are banking on your lack of tech literacy and extensive use of gaslighting. Age verification will necessitate centralising your biometric data in order FOR ANYONE to use the internet. This is the mass on boarding process towards full blown Digital ID and digital currency. When the UN, World Bank, WEF, Blackrock, Helen Clark, Tony Blair, Bill Gates, The Bank for international Settlements, Albanese and Keir Starmer are lobbying for Digital ID its a pretty whopping big clue. National, Labour, Greens have said they’ll work together to pass legislation for age verification and digital ID. This is a total disaster. Watch the video. Winston Peters on fighting against Digital ID & global overreach. Petition here :

🚩🚩Please read sign this petition asking for a FULL public consultation on digital ID to stop authoritarianist over reach. One only has to see what is happening in the UK, and soon Australia (which rolls out age verification in December) and multiple other countries to realise this has nothing to do with keeping children safe, but everything to do with control of what you do, what you say and eventually over sight of every aspect of your life. The bureaucrats and the Govt are banking on your lack of tech literacy and extensive use of gaslighting. Age verification will necessitate centralising your biometric data in order FOR ANYONE to use the internet. This is the mass on boarding process towards full blown Digital ID and digital currency. When the UN, World Bank, WEF, Blackrock, Helen Clark, Tony Blair, Bill Gates, The Bank for international Settlements, Albanese and Keir Starmer are lobbying for Digital ID its a pretty whopping big clue. National, Labour, Greens have said they’ll work together to pass legislation for age verification and digital ID. This is a total disaster. Watch the video. Winston Peters on fighting against Digital ID & global overreach. Petition here :

Holyhekatuiteka

40,820 次观看 • 1 年前

Social media ban or big brother control? The government, with support of the Liberals, is proposing a ban on children under 16 accessing social media, justifying the measure by claiming it’s "popular." Oh, really? It’s ironic that the same parties that accuse One Nation of populism are now pushing a measure not because it’s practical, but simply because it’s supposedly popular. A true conservative party Peter Dutton would support parents to supervise their own children in their own homes. A true conservative, Mr Dutton, would not be promoting big government replacing parents. The eGovernment is also trialling age-assurance technology, which uses facial scans of every social media user to confirm they are over 16. If there’s any doubt, the system will cross-check the person’s Digital ID to ensure it matches. In addition to facial scans, the "Assurance AI" will monitor keystrokes, audio patterns and "other measures" to determine the user’s age. By now you may conclude, as I did, that enforcing a social media age limit of 16 would require verifying everyone’s age using the device camera and their Digital ID—which everyone would be forced to have. So much for Digital ID being voluntary. Even adults will need one to continue using social media. Even more alarming is the fact that conversations would be monitored for signs of age, yet what happens to the voice prints and keystroke logs this system collects? To make this work, cameras on devices would need to run constantly to ensure a new user hasn’t hopped on to an existing computer session. This means cameras would always be on, capturing everything - video and audio – that is happening in the room. This creates a perfect scenario for hackers to access the feed. In the unlikely event they can actually make this work, children would move to other platforms that are less regulated, less safe and more prone to child exploitation. One Nation opposes this legislation. The best people to monitor and regulate children’s internet use are parents—not a Big Brother government.

Social media ban or big brother control? The government, with support of the Liberals, is proposing a ban on children under 16 accessing social media, justifying the measure by claiming it’s "popular." Oh, really? It’s ironic that the same parties that accuse One Nation of populism are now pushing a measure not because it’s practical, but simply because it’s supposedly popular. A true conservative party Peter Dutton would support parents to supervise their own children in their own homes. A true conservative, Mr Dutton, would not be promoting big government replacing parents. The eGovernment is also trialling age-assurance technology, which uses facial scans of every social media user to confirm they are over 16. If there’s any doubt, the system will cross-check the person’s Digital ID to ensure it matches. In addition to facial scans, the "Assurance AI" will monitor keystrokes, audio patterns and "other measures" to determine the user’s age. By now you may conclude, as I did, that enforcing a social media age limit of 16 would require verifying everyone’s age using the device camera and their Digital ID—which everyone would be forced to have. So much for Digital ID being voluntary. Even adults will need one to continue using social media. Even more alarming is the fact that conversations would be monitored for signs of age, yet what happens to the voice prints and keystroke logs this system collects? To make this work, cameras on devices would need to run constantly to ensure a new user hasn’t hopped on to an existing computer session. This means cameras would always be on, capturing everything - video and audio – that is happening in the room. This creates a perfect scenario for hackers to access the feed. In the unlikely event they can actually make this work, children would move to other platforms that are less regulated, less safe and more prone to child exploitation. One Nation opposes this legislation. The best people to monitor and regulate children’s internet use are parents—not a Big Brother government.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

65,540 次观看 • 1 年前

Back door to Digital ID? Some are asking if the under-16s social media ban is a backdoor to Digital ID? As far as Kemi and the Conservatives are concerned, absolutely not. We are entirely opposed to digital ID and want to see the ban implemented in a way that doesn’t force mandatory digital ID onto anyone. Proving your age for social media should be no more intrusive than it is for buying alcohol.

Back door to Digital ID? Some are asking if the under-16s social media ban is a backdoor to Digital ID? As far as Kemi and the Conservatives are concerned, absolutely not. We are entirely opposed to digital ID and want to see the ban implemented in a way that doesn’t force mandatory digital ID onto anyone. Proving your age for social media should be no more intrusive than it is for buying alcohol.

Kevin Hollinrake MP

193,490 次观看 • 4 个月前

Nigel Farage describes Keir Starmer's under-16 social media ban as an attempt to impose digital ID via the back door. He maintains that the British public should not sacrifice freedoms for a surveillance state that arrests 12,000 people for social media posts annually. "We're all going to have to prove our age... This would mean full facial recognition and going on to a digital register, and I fear that it is digital ID via the back door."

Nigel Farage describes Keir Starmer's under-16 social media ban as an attempt to impose digital ID via the back door. He maintains that the British public should not sacrifice freedoms for a surveillance state that arrests 12,000 people for social media posts annually. "We're all going to have to prove our age... This would mean full facial recognition and going on to a digital register, and I fear that it is digital ID via the back door."

Wide Awake Media

20,795 次观看 • 4 个月前

Ireland to be the testing ground in Europe for Chinese-style mandatory Digital ID to access social media. Tánaiste Simon Harris trying to push the narrative that the government's plan to link Digital ID to social media access is necessary to protect the welfare of children. Any thinking person knows the reality is that this is about absolute control and surveillance of every aspect of your life. By connecting social media to Digital ID means that every web page access could be traced back to a specific holder of a Public Services Card in Ireland. This is the start of a digital prison. The EU is in the process of implementing a European Central Bank digital euro. If we go along with this we will be transposed into a CBDC Digital ID cashless society whereby your every financial transaction will be controlled, monitored, traced and tracked. The plan by the Irish government to link Digital ID to access social media is already underway. Social media platforms in Ireland have been contacted by the government to take part in a pilot to be rolled out in March and the government have already announced they intend to put in place legislation later this year to get their dystopian plans over the line. We must RESIST this sinister plan to get mandatory Digital ID through the back door. What is to stop successive governments from implementing a social credit system if you say something online that is against the narrative of the establishment?. Your social welfare benefits and right to work could be restricted by this massive government overreach, if you step out of line. If we do not RESIST this with all our might we face the end of humanity as we know it. A digital prison surveillance planet whereby the global corporations, governments and Bankers have complete control over every aspect of our lives. It is up to us to push back against these draconian plans with all our might. We defeated the government's Referendum. We staved off the controversial Hate Speech 'thought police' Bill. We secured the highest ever spoilt votes in Irish history and, indeed, in Europe. We CAN defeat this attack on our fundamental rights and freedoms IF we join as a cohesive force against the government's plans for a Chinese-style dystopian surveillance society. We owe it to future generations to push back with all our might. #NoDigitalID

Ireland to be the testing ground in Europe for Chinese-style mandatory Digital ID to access social media. Tánaiste Simon Harris trying to push the narrative that the government's plan to link Digital ID to social media access is necessary to protect the welfare of children. Any thinking person knows the reality is that this is about absolute control and surveillance of every aspect of your life. By connecting social media to Digital ID means that every web page access could be traced back to a specific holder of a Public Services Card in Ireland. This is the start of a digital prison. The EU is in the process of implementing a European Central Bank digital euro. If we go along with this we will be transposed into a CBDC Digital ID cashless society whereby your every financial transaction will be controlled, monitored, traced and tracked. The plan by the Irish government to link Digital ID to access social media is already underway. Social media platforms in Ireland have been contacted by the government to take part in a pilot to be rolled out in March and the government have already announced they intend to put in place legislation later this year to get their dystopian plans over the line. We must RESIST this sinister plan to get mandatory Digital ID through the back door. What is to stop successive governments from implementing a social credit system if you say something online that is against the narrative of the establishment?. Your social welfare benefits and right to work could be restricted by this massive government overreach, if you step out of line. If we do not RESIST this with all our might we face the end of humanity as we know it. A digital prison surveillance planet whereby the global corporations, governments and Bankers have complete control over every aspect of our lives. It is up to us to push back against these draconian plans with all our might. We defeated the government's Referendum. We staved off the controversial Hate Speech 'thought police' Bill. We secured the highest ever spoilt votes in Irish history and, indeed, in Europe. We CAN defeat this attack on our fundamental rights and freedoms IF we join as a cohesive force against the government's plans for a Chinese-style dystopian surveillance society. We owe it to future generations to push back with all our might. #NoDigitalID

Lawyers For Justice Ireland

35,777 次观看 • 9 个月前

Australian PM Anthony Albanese: "We're banning social media for under-16s to keep them safe online." No, you're banning social media for under-16s so EVERYBODY has to verify their age and identity (to prove they're over 16), enabling you impose digital ID under the guise of "keeping children safe".

Australian PM Anthony Albanese: "We're banning social media for under-16s to keep them safe online." No, you're banning social media for under-16s so EVERYBODY has to verify their age and identity (to prove they're over 16), enabling you impose digital ID under the guise of "keeping children safe".

Wide Awake Media

219,108 次观看 • 11 个月前

DIGITAL ID - Australia lets the cat out of the bag! In order to ban under 16s from social media, EVERYONE will have to have digital ID or they won’t be able to get on the internet It wasn’t a conspiracy theory was it 🔥

DIGITAL ID - Australia lets the cat out of the bag! In order to ban under 16s from social media, EVERYONE will have to have digital ID or they won’t be able to get on the internet It wasn’t a conspiracy theory was it 🔥

Bernie

1,344,155 次观看 • 1 年前

People power 1 Government stupidity 0 “Social media companies will not need to verify the age of every user or meet a minimum standard for how many teenagers they boot off their platforms, with the federal government confirming a lighter-touch approach to enforcing its under-16 ban. While the platforms must satisfy the eSafety watchdog that they have taken "reasonable steps" to remove the accounts of those aged under 16, there will be no legally-enforceable standard for accuracy. As expected, platforms will not be told which technology to use for age screening, but will need to ensure their policies are transparent and consistent, and that there is a process for disputes.” ••••••••••••••••••••••• Thanks to Dr Joanne Orlando for this footage. This Digital ID thought bubble gets dumber and dumber. Digital ID is now not going to be enforced for every user and instead to be subject to random spot checks. So much for protecting the children! Furthermore the social media companies are no longer going to be subject to legally enforceable standards. The whole process is a waste of time and just another clumsy attempt at government overreach. As I pointed out last year disadvantaged children (see clip in comments) are going to lose access to their friends on social media that they rely on as they can’t see them physically every day. In other words good people are going to be punished through bad legislation. I also pointed out that children could use VPNs and will find other ways to bypass surveillance. As it stands you could drive a truck through this poorly thought out plan. It’s just another reason to get rid of Albanese and his inept administration. To help us do it please sign up to today.

People power 1 Government stupidity 0 “Social media companies will not need to verify the age of every user or meet a minimum standard for how many teenagers they boot off their platforms, with the federal government confirming a lighter-touch approach to enforcing its under-16 ban. While the platforms must satisfy the eSafety watchdog that they have taken "reasonable steps" to remove the accounts of those aged under 16, there will be no legally-enforceable standard for accuracy. As expected, platforms will not be told which technology to use for age screening, but will need to ensure their policies are transparent and consistent, and that there is a process for disputes.” ••••••••••••••••••••••• Thanks to Dr Joanne Orlando for this footage. This Digital ID thought bubble gets dumber and dumber. Digital ID is now not going to be enforced for every user and instead to be subject to random spot checks. So much for protecting the children! Furthermore the social media companies are no longer going to be subject to legally enforceable standards. The whole process is a waste of time and just another clumsy attempt at government overreach. As I pointed out last year disadvantaged children (see clip in comments) are going to lose access to their friends on social media that they rely on as they can’t see them physically every day. In other words good people are going to be punished through bad legislation. I also pointed out that children could use VPNs and will find other ways to bypass surveillance. As it stands you could drive a truck through this poorly thought out plan. It’s just another reason to get rid of Albanese and his inept administration. To help us do it please sign up to today.

Gerard Rennick

47,597 次观看 • 11 个月前

Social media ban for youth or the beginning of a digital ID roll out in Australia? What do you think? step 1: Introduce a law that requires age verification step 2: a non mandatory 'recommended' standardisation step 3: Create an "optional" digital ID to simplify compliance step 4: Platforms start requiring the government approved method step 5: expand the ID beyond social media and pressure to make it mandatory step 6: add facial verification / device linking and sell this as 'security and safety' step 7: the worst step- digital ID becomes the gateway to the internet. It becomes a 'digital passport’. The danger of a digital passport is that it can eventually link your medical records, travel, finances, and online identity into one system, giving future governments or corporations too much control. Digital ID starts harmless, but it's the unchecked expansion without accountability or opt out that becomes concerning. Governments worldwide have already talked about: identity based online access anti-trolling / anti disinformation ID removing anonymous accounts tracking online behaviour Be vigilant, awake and trust your intuition 🌹

Social media ban for youth or the beginning of a digital ID roll out in Australia? What do you think? step 1: Introduce a law that requires age verification step 2: a non mandatory 'recommended' standardisation step 3: Create an "optional" digital ID to simplify compliance step 4: Platforms start requiring the government approved method step 5: expand the ID beyond social media and pressure to make it mandatory step 6: add facial verification / device linking and sell this as 'security and safety' step 7: the worst step- digital ID becomes the gateway to the internet. It becomes a 'digital passport’. The danger of a digital passport is that it can eventually link your medical records, travel, finances, and online identity into one system, giving future governments or corporations too much control. Digital ID starts harmless, but it's the unchecked expansion without accountability or opt out that becomes concerning. Governments worldwide have already talked about: identity based online access anti-trolling / anti disinformation ID removing anonymous accounts tracking online behaviour Be vigilant, awake and trust your intuition 🌹

iyah may

23,430 次观看 • 10 个月前

Is Australia the first domino to fall? I believe they’re currently rolling out this social media ban gradually, things will heat up on December 27th, when the mandatory age verification for searches is set to be implemented. A digital straight jacket will be placed on all of us.

Is Australia the first domino to fall? I believe they’re currently rolling out this social media ban gradually, things will heat up on December 27th, when the mandatory age verification for searches is set to be implemented. A digital straight jacket will be placed on all of us.

katy 🌸

74,363 次观看 • 10 个月前

“We haven't seen the kind of compliance I would have hoped for from the social media platforms. We know they have the technology to do that,” says Julie Inman Grant, who is in charge of enforcing Australia’s social media ban for children under 16. In the first three months of the ban, 50% of children under 16 who still held accounts said they hadn’t even been asked to confirm their age, her office says. Meta, TikTok and Snap told 60 Minutes that they take child safety and the Australia ban seriously.

“We haven't seen the kind of compliance I would have hoped for from the social media platforms. We know they have the technology to do that,” says Julie Inman Grant, who is in charge of enforcing Australia’s social media ban for children under 16. In the first three months of the ban, 50% of children under 16 who still held accounts said they hadn’t even been asked to confirm their age, her office says. Meta, TikTok and Snap told 60 Minutes that they take child safety and the Australia ban seriously.

60 Minutes

17,062 次观看 • 1 天前