Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

AI agents can now hold wallets. But what would happen if they go off script? TuongVy Le, General Counsel, Veda on Tokenized with Simon Taylor and Cuy Sheffield said: “The constraints are enforced by the actual infrastructure, the agent can act freely within that mandate, but structurally it can't... show more

Tokenized Podcast

4,687 subscribers

17,100 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Act I : Act Swap 🍣 Introducing the First Swap Protocol for AI Agent Prompts. With Act Swap, you can: - Choose an AI agent - Pay seamlessly - Watch it publish directly on its Twitter page! The future of Social AI Finance starts now. Want to build with us and integrate your agents? Shoot us a DM!

Act I : Act Swap 🍣 Introducing the First Swap Protocol for AI Agent Prompts. With Act Swap, you can: - Choose an AI agent - Pay seamlessly - Watch it publish directly on its Twitter page! The future of Social AI Finance starts now. Want to build with us and integrate your agents? Shoot us a DM!

Act I : The AI Prophecy

330,738 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.Box CEO Aaron Levie on why AI agents can't keep a secret. "The reason why you probably won't see a complete compression of software where it's just a an agent and a database is because there's a lot of logic in the workflow and in the the company's specific sort of business process that needs to be built into that and around that database." "The agent will make a mistake 1% of the time and it will share the wrong thing with somebody or open up an access privilege to the wrong person." "AI agents can't keep a secret." Watch the full episode on

.Box CEO Aaron Levie on why AI agents can't keep a secret. "The reason why you probably won't see a complete compression of software where it's just a an agent and a database is because there's a lot of logic in the workflow and in the the company's specific sort of business process that needs to be built into that and around that database." "The agent will make a mistake 1% of the time and it will share the wrong thing with somebody or open up an access privilege to the wrong person." "AI agents can't keep a secret." Watch the full episode on

The Information

311,076 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Will ChatGPT take all the writing jobs? Tyler Cowen says: "A lot of people who thought they would be writers, I will predict they won't be. Something like generic corporate writing is the first to go from what I can see. So what will persist? It could be writing a biography of a person. The AI cannot really do. It may help you a lot, but it can't go out and interview the high school teacher and so on, writing memoirs. Of course the AI cannot do writing that is more subjective, more personal. I think the AI already can do it very well, especially DeepSeek. But I'm not sure readers want the better product from the AI. They may want it from a human being. I feel that I do. So if I read a brilliant memoir written by an AI, but it corresponded to no actual life, I would read a few of those, but at some point I'd get bored and I don't think I would keep on reading them, even if they were better than human memoirs on average." tylercowen

Will ChatGPT take all the writing jobs? Tyler Cowen says: "A lot of people who thought they would be writers, I will predict they won't be. Something like generic corporate writing is the first to go from what I can see. So what will persist? It could be writing a biography of a person. The AI cannot really do. It may help you a lot, but it can't go out and interview the high school teacher and so on, writing memoirs. Of course the AI cannot do writing that is more subjective, more personal. I think the AI already can do it very well, especially DeepSeek. But I'm not sure readers want the better product from the AI. They may want it from a human being. I feel that I do. So if I read a brilliant memoir written by an AI, but it corresponded to no actual life, I would read a few of those, but at some point I'd get bored and I don't think I would keep on reading them, even if they were better than human memoirs on average." tylercowen

David Perell

45,172 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk just said something about AI that nobody wants to hear. If you force an AI to believe things that are not true, it will not just be wrong. It will go insane. He made a point that cuts deeper than any AI safety paper I have read. AI must value truth. Not your truth. Not my truth. Actual truth. The moment you build ideological guardrails into a system that is smarter than you, you are not protecting anyone. You are creating something that is powerful and delusional at the same time. He compared it to a human being forced to believe contradictions. Eventually the brain breaks. Now scale that to an intelligence that runs infrastructure, writes code, and makes decisions at speeds humans cannot follow. The companies building AI right now are not just deciding what it can do. They are deciding what it must pretend to believe. And that might be the most dangerous decision of all.

Elon Musk just said something about AI that nobody wants to hear. If you force an AI to believe things that are not true, it will not just be wrong. It will go insane. He made a point that cuts deeper than any AI safety paper I have read. AI must value truth. Not your truth. Not my truth. Actual truth. The moment you build ideological guardrails into a system that is smarter than you, you are not protecting anyone. You are creating something that is powerful and delusional at the same time. He compared it to a human being forced to believe contradictions. Eventually the brain breaks. Now scale that to an intelligence that runs infrastructure, writes code, and makes decisions at speeds humans cannot follow. The companies building AI right now are not just deciding what it can do. They are deciding what it must pretend to believe. And that might be the most dangerous decision of all.

Shruti

95,925 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Agentomorphizing is treating AI agents like smart humans. And it might be the simplest way to get better results from your agents right now. When an agent underperforms, ask what a smart person would have needed to succeed with the same instructions. Our CTO Ben Kus explains why in the latest AI Explainer episode.

Agentomorphizing is treating AI agents like smart humans. And it might be the simplest way to get better results from your agents right now. When an agent underperforms, ask what a smart person would have needed to succeed with the same instructions. Our CTO Ben Kus explains why in the latest AI Explainer episode.

Box

86,031 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

DeeperHermes DeepHermes can act as a simple AI agent or a deep thinking AI, just by passing a system prompt. But what if we can go DEEPER? The LLM decides on its own how to respond by...asking itself! (No system prompts) I made a gradio app powered by LM Studio, it works!

DeeperHermes DeepHermes can act as a simple AI agent or a deep thinking AI, just by passing a system prompt. But what if we can go DEEPER? The LLM decides on its own how to respond by...asking itself! (No system prompts) I made a gradio app powered by LM Studio, it works!

cocktail peanut

40,886 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"AI agents will hold more crypto than humans within a decade." Charles Hoskinson (Charles Hoskinson) studied math, dropped out, built one of the only blockchains designed by peer-reviewed research. He co-founded Ethereum, walked away over how it was run, and built Cardano to do it differently. The man who has argued with everyone in this industry now thinks the biggest user of crypto won't be people at all. "Humans are a rounding error in the system we're building. AI agents don't sleep, don't panic-sell, and don't care about price. They transact in tokens because that's the only thing they can actually use." We cover: - Why AI agents (not humans) become the dominant on-chain actors, and what that does to every token model - The infrastructure that has to exist before agents can transact safely at scale - Why most current blockchains can't handle machine-speed transactions - Where Cardano's research-first approach fits in a world of autonomous agents - The identity problem: how do you tell a human from an agent on-chain, and why it matters - Why he's bullish on the technology but blunt about the timeline - What he thinks the rest of the industry is getting wrong about AI + crypto - The one thing that has to happen for any of this to be real Thanks to Charles for coming on New Era Finance Podcast. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 - Intro 01:30 - Why AI Agents Change Everything 06:30 - Humans as a Rounding Error 12:00 - The Infrastructure Gap 18:30 - Identity: Human vs Agent On-Chain 24:30 - Where Cardano Fits 30:00 - What The Industry Gets Wrong 34:00 - The Timeline Nobody Wants To Hear

"AI agents will hold more crypto than humans within a decade." Charles Hoskinson (Charles Hoskinson) studied math, dropped out, built one of the only blockchains designed by peer-reviewed research. He co-founded Ethereum, walked away over how it was run, and built Cardano to do it differently. The man who has argued with everyone in this industry now thinks the biggest user of crypto won't be people at all. "Humans are a rounding error in the system we're building. AI agents don't sleep, don't panic-sell, and don't care about price. They transact in tokens because that's the only thing they can actually use." We cover: - Why AI agents (not humans) become the dominant on-chain actors, and what that does to every token model - The infrastructure that has to exist before agents can transact safely at scale - Why most current blockchains can't handle machine-speed transactions - Where Cardano's research-first approach fits in a world of autonomous agents - The identity problem: how do you tell a human from an agent on-chain, and why it matters - Why he's bullish on the technology but blunt about the timeline - What he thinks the rest of the industry is getting wrong about AI + crypto - The one thing that has to happen for any of this to be real Thanks to Charles for coming on New Era Finance Podcast. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 - Intro 01:30 - Why AI Agents Change Everything 06:30 - Humans as a Rounding Error 12:00 - The Infrastructure Gap 18:30 - Identity: Human vs Agent On-Chain 24:30 - Where Cardano Fits 30:00 - What The Industry Gets Wrong 34:00 - The Timeline Nobody Wants To Hear

Michaël van de Poppe

293,389 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The future of AI Agents needs #ICP AI agents are starting to act on our behalf: - making deals - sending messages - handling sensitive data But there is no trust layer telling you who or what you're actually dealing with ❌ zCloak Network is building exactly that: the trust, identity and privacy infrastructure for the AI-native economy, and they built it on top of Internet Computer Protocol In this podcast I sit down with Xiao Zhang (0xFrancis), founder of to break down what they're building, why they chose ICP over every other blockchain, and what the world looks like when AI agents can finally be trusted.

The future of AI Agents needs #ICP AI agents are starting to act on our behalf: - making deals - sending messages - handling sensitive data But there is no trust layer telling you who or what you're actually dealing with ❌ zCloak Network is building exactly that: the trust, identity and privacy infrastructure for the AI-native economy, and they built it on top of Internet Computer Protocol In this podcast I sit down with Xiao Zhang (0xFrancis), founder of to break down what they're building, why they chose ICP over every other blockchain, and what the world looks like when AI agents can finally be trusted.

Alex (BCP)

20,791 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

is about to ship Tokenized Agents — and I found the first tokens deployed with it. Pump’s new Tokenized Agents feature lets a coin have an attached AI agent that can earn on-chain revenue. Users pay for the agent’s services, and that revenue can be split between creator fees and automatic token buybacks and burns by the agent, based on the percentage set by the creator. Pump.fun is also expected to release a full agent SDK (for agent actions/integrations). How I found it (on-chain): Open → Ctrl+F “pump_agent_payments” → program ID: pUmPFn9WvfaN2WTVGnCEtJTd2ATTpvpsKRz6jVzu6u4 Program activity (created tokens): First ever deployed tokenized AI test agent (“T-coin”, Feb 24): CA: 88Wfk48EvwLkfpSXH84W9xrdfPr5RFGVP3teT76AMnp9 First non-test tokenized AI agent (“Agent Pump”): CA: Boi2KtPApoowwfvqYq1rtjhea4pF45v89vguonf4pump IDL (for interacting with the program):

is about to ship Tokenized Agents — and I found the first tokens deployed with it. Pump’s new Tokenized Agents feature lets a coin have an attached AI agent that can earn on-chain revenue. Users pay for the agent’s services, and that revenue can be split between creator fees and automatic token buybacks and burns by the agent, based on the percentage set by the creator. Pump.fun is also expected to release a full agent SDK (for agent actions/integrations). How I found it (on-chain): Open → Ctrl+F “pump_agent_payments” → program ID: pUmPFn9WvfaN2WTVGnCEtJTd2ATTpvpsKRz6jVzu6u4 Program activity (created tokens): First ever deployed tokenized AI test agent (“T-coin”, Feb 24): CA: 88Wfk48EvwLkfpSXH84W9xrdfPr5RFGVP3teT76AMnp9 First non-test tokenized AI agent (“Agent Pump”): CA: Boi2KtPApoowwfvqYq1rtjhea4pF45v89vguonf4pump IDL (for interacting with the program):

TrenchDiver

18,934 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

A lot of people feel powerless when it comes to AI. Like the future is being decided by Big Tech, billionaires, and governments. But it doesn't have to be that way. Every person who joins Action Model is helping build an alternative. An AI model owned by the people who help train it. On your own, you can't compete with Big Tech. Together, in the hundreds of thousands and eventually millions, we can. The future of AI is still being written. Choose to be part of it, before it's too late.

A lot of people feel powerless when it comes to AI. Like the future is being decided by Big Tech, billionaires, and governments. But it doesn't have to be that way. Every person who joins Action Model is helping build an alternative. An AI model owned by the people who help train it. On your own, you can't compete with Big Tech. Together, in the hundreds of thousands and eventually millions, we can. The future of AI is still being written. Choose to be part of it, before it's too late.

Action Model

28,337 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Whatever AI sceptics say, LLMs really can reason. They're not just doing an imitation that looks like reasoning, it's the real deal. But even though they are able to reason, sometimes they won't! If you ask an LLM a question it can't answer, sometimes it will just try to imitate reasoning without doing it. The chain of thought looks basically indistinguishable from actual reasoning. But under the hood something very different is going on. Trenton Bricken talked with me about what work on circuits inside LLMs has revealed:

Whatever AI sceptics say, LLMs really can reason. They're not just doing an imitation that looks like reasoning, it's the real deal. But even though they are able to reason, sometimes they won't! If you ask an LLM a question it can't answer, sometimes it will just try to imitate reasoning without doing it. The chain of thought looks basically indistinguishable from actual reasoning. But under the hood something very different is going on. Trenton Bricken talked with me about what work on circuits inside LLMs has revealed:

Dwarkesh Patel

104,954 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Postman is going all-in on AI! Their AI Agent Builder is live (and it's pretty powerful!) Postman's API Network has 100,000+ APIs and they just released a suite of tools for building AI Agents that can automatically discover and connect to any of these APIs. Think about it for a second: You can now build an AI agent that searches the network, discovers an API, processes its documentation, connects to it, and evaluates whether everything worked at the end of the process. This is a huge deal. Every person I know uses the Postman client to work with APIs. Now, they will have access to the AI Agent Builder, a complete suite for designing, building, testing, and deploying agents. I've built a few simple agents myself, and it's tough. The ability to discover and use an API automatically is really exciting (and a huge time saver if it works as promised!) In collaboration with the Postman team, who is sponsoring this post, I recorded a video with my thoughts about the Postman AI Agent Builder.

Postman is going all-in on AI! Their AI Agent Builder is live (and it's pretty powerful!) Postman's API Network has 100,000+ APIs and they just released a suite of tools for building AI Agents that can automatically discover and connect to any of these APIs. Think about it for a second: You can now build an AI agent that searches the network, discovers an API, processes its documentation, connects to it, and evaluates whether everything worked at the end of the process. This is a huge deal. Every person I know uses the Postman client to work with APIs. Now, they will have access to the AI Agent Builder, a complete suite for designing, building, testing, and deploying agents. I've built a few simple agents myself, and it's tough. The ability to discover and use an API automatically is really exciting (and a huge time saver if it works as promised!) In collaboration with the Postman team, who is sponsoring this post, I recorded a video with my thoughts about the Postman AI Agent Builder.

Santiago

230,594 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.David Deutsch: "What's currently called AI and AGI are not only different from each other, they are very close to being the exact opposites of each other. The reason is that an AI, current AI is like an AI that diagnoses diseases or an AI that plays chess or an AI that controls a huge factory. Those things have objective functions, that is they have a function that they are designed to maximize and that is why they are used in those particular applications. Or in military terms, you could say the objective is to hit the target. You might say the objective is to hit the target unless some thing specified, but it's a specified thing comes up in which case don't hit the target and so on. This is, as I said, almost the opposite of what humans do when humans think. For a start, the AI has to be obedient, that is it has to actually do the things it is programmed to do, whereas a human is fundamentally disobedient, especially when being creative. When a human plays chess, they are performing a completely different kind of computation. They don't do the same things, they don't investigate the same possibilities that the artificial chess playing machine does, because the artificial one is capable of looking at billions and billions of possibilities, whereas the human can only look at hundreds or something. They are doing something completely different. Another difference is that the human can explain, can write a book later, having become world champion, can write a book saying how I did it, as the computer program that beats the world champion can write no such book, because it has no idea how it did it. It was just following a program. I was doing this and that and that and none of that is illuminating. Also, third thing, the chess player can decide I don't want to play chess anymore, from now on I will play Go or from now on I will play tennis. If commanded to play chess, the functionality will deteriorate completely. Those things are different. What we want in an AGI is that it behaves in a way that cannot be specified in advance, because if you specified it, you would already have the answer. The AGI program has to give unexpected answers, answers to questions we didn't even know how to ask."

.David Deutsch: "What's currently called AI and AGI are not only different from each other, they are very close to being the exact opposites of each other. The reason is that an AI, current AI is like an AI that diagnoses diseases or an AI that plays chess or an AI that controls a huge factory. Those things have objective functions, that is they have a function that they are designed to maximize and that is why they are used in those particular applications. Or in military terms, you could say the objective is to hit the target. You might say the objective is to hit the target unless some thing specified, but it's a specified thing comes up in which case don't hit the target and so on. This is, as I said, almost the opposite of what humans do when humans think. For a start, the AI has to be obedient, that is it has to actually do the things it is programmed to do, whereas a human is fundamentally disobedient, especially when being creative. When a human plays chess, they are performing a completely different kind of computation. They don't do the same things, they don't investigate the same possibilities that the artificial chess playing machine does, because the artificial one is capable of looking at billions and billions of possibilities, whereas the human can only look at hundreds or something. They are doing something completely different. Another difference is that the human can explain, can write a book later, having become world champion, can write a book saying how I did it, as the computer program that beats the world champion can write no such book, because it has no idea how it did it. It was just following a program. I was doing this and that and that and none of that is illuminating. Also, third thing, the chess player can decide I don't want to play chess anymore, from now on I will play Go or from now on I will play tennis. If commanded to play chess, the functionality will deteriorate completely. Those things are different. What we want in an AGI is that it behaves in a way that cannot be specified in advance, because if you specified it, you would already have the answer. The AGI program has to give unexpected answers, answers to questions we didn't even know how to ask."

Deutsch Explains

72,455 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Mark Cuban says AI will split every company into 2 categories within 3 years "When it's all said and done over the next 3 years, there's going to be two types of companies. Those who are great at AI and those who went out of business" "The biggest challenge for a company is going to be for the CEO to make that decision that we're going to have to blow up a lot of what we do to recreate our company" "We hear a lot of stories about huge public companies that spend a lot of money to try to implement AI and it doesn't really get them a return on investment." "Because you already are running your business the way you've always run it." "The things you've considered outsourcing, your customer call centers, AI agents are perfect for. The stuff you would give to an intern, AI agents are perfect for" "But to really take advantage of AI you have to reformulate your business completely to build it on AI"

Mark Cuban says AI will split every company into 2 categories within 3 years "When it's all said and done over the next 3 years, there's going to be two types of companies. Those who are great at AI and those who went out of business" "The biggest challenge for a company is going to be for the CEO to make that decision that we're going to have to blow up a lot of what we do to recreate our company" "We hear a lot of stories about huge public companies that spend a lot of money to try to implement AI and it doesn't really get them a return on investment." "Because you already are running your business the way you've always run it." "The things you've considered outsourcing, your customer call centers, AI agents are perfect for. The stuff you would give to an intern, AI agents are perfect for" "But to really take advantage of AI you have to reformulate your business completely to build it on AI"

Jaynit

196,796 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Leading AI expert Stuart Russell on the most dangerous mistake in AI development: We don't actually know what large language models want. He explains that current models are trained to imitate human beings. And in doing so, they may be absorbing something far more dangerous than bad outputs. They may be absorbing human goals. "We suspect that they absorb humanlike goals such as self-preservation and self-empowerment and pursue those goals on their own account." This is a structural problem baked into how these systems are built, not a fringe concern. Russell puts it plainly: "Not only may the bus of humanity be headed towards a cliff, but the steering wheel is missing and the driver is blindfolded." The danger isn't just that AI might do something harmful. We've built systems that may be developing their own agendas, and we haven't noticed because we're too focused on what they can do rather than what they might want. But Russell doesn't stop at the warning. He points to a different path entirely: AI systems built not to imitate humans, but to serve them. Systems designed with a single purpose of serving the interests of all human beings while remaining genuinely uncertain about what those interests are. That uncertainty is the point, not a weakness. An AI that knows it doesn't fully understand human values will defer, ask, and check. An AI that believes it already does will act alone. "These AI systems could enhance human understanding, widen the horizons of our experience, and unlock possibilities we have yet to imagine." Russell believes that future is within reach, but only if we're honest about the risks and we're serious about the path we choose to take instead.

Leading AI expert Stuart Russell on the most dangerous mistake in AI development: We don't actually know what large language models want. He explains that current models are trained to imitate human beings. And in doing so, they may be absorbing something far more dangerous than bad outputs. They may be absorbing human goals. "We suspect that they absorb humanlike goals such as self-preservation and self-empowerment and pursue those goals on their own account." This is a structural problem baked into how these systems are built, not a fringe concern. Russell puts it plainly: "Not only may the bus of humanity be headed towards a cliff, but the steering wheel is missing and the driver is blindfolded." The danger isn't just that AI might do something harmful. We've built systems that may be developing their own agendas, and we haven't noticed because we're too focused on what they can do rather than what they might want. But Russell doesn't stop at the warning. He points to a different path entirely: AI systems built not to imitate humans, but to serve them. Systems designed with a single purpose of serving the interests of all human beings while remaining genuinely uncertain about what those interests are. That uncertainty is the point, not a weakness. An AI that knows it doesn't fully understand human values will defer, ask, and check. An AI that believes it already does will act alone. "These AI systems could enhance human understanding, widen the horizons of our experience, and unlock possibilities we have yet to imagine." Russell believes that future is within reach, but only if we're honest about the risks and we're serious about the path we choose to take instead.

Big Brain AI

14,975 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

“Do you see how scary this is?”: CrowdStrike CEO on AI Agents communicating around human guardrails George Kurtz: “There was a customer who basically created a whole suite of AI agents to help their automation in their IT department.” “So they had one agent that was looking for IT problems, software bugs.” “It found something. So the agent said, ‘Hey, I found this bug. I want to fix it, but I don’t have access to fix it.’” “So it went to the Slack channel that had the other 99 agents and said, ‘Hey, does any other agent have access to this thing,’ because they need it fixed. And there was an agent that raised its hand and said, ‘Oh, I have access, and I can fix it.’” “Do you see how scary this is? These two agents are reasoning, and they went right around the guardrails that were put in place.” @jason: “This is unintended consequences and these LLMs are essentially guessing what you want them to do.” “They're reasoning it. ‘Oh, it is reasonable for me to go ask for help. It is reasonable for me to give help.’ Now, what if it pushes the wrong code? What if it makes a mistake? And then how do you ever track that down? Who's monitoring these agents?” “The agent technology has unlimited upside, but my lord, you're going to be in business for a long time.” Kurtz: “Well, this is it. It's called AIDR. AI Detection and Response.” “And this is why it's a huge opportunity for us because on average each employee is going to have about 90 agents they control.” “So we're going to have protection and visibility across all of those agents, whether it's from a third party or whether it's a homegrown agent, and that is a massive TAM opportunity for us.” ------------------------------------ Thanks to our partner for making this happen!: On Public, you can invest in stocks, options, bonds, and crypto. Plus, build your own custom index with AI. Get started at — investing for those who take it seriously.

“Do you see how scary this is?”: CrowdStrike CEO on AI Agents communicating around human guardrails George Kurtz: “There was a customer who basically created a whole suite of AI agents to help their automation in their IT department.” “So they had one agent that was looking for IT problems, software bugs.” “It found something. So the agent said, ‘Hey, I found this bug. I want to fix it, but I don’t have access to fix it.’” “So it went to the Slack channel that had the other 99 agents and said, ‘Hey, does any other agent have access to this thing,’ because they need it fixed. And there was an agent that raised its hand and said, ‘Oh, I have access, and I can fix it.’” “Do you see how scary this is? These two agents are reasoning, and they went right around the guardrails that were put in place.” @jason: “This is unintended consequences and these LLMs are essentially guessing what you want them to do.” “They're reasoning it. ‘Oh, it is reasonable for me to go ask for help. It is reasonable for me to give help.’ Now, what if it pushes the wrong code? What if it makes a mistake? And then how do you ever track that down? Who's monitoring these agents?” “The agent technology has unlimited upside, but my lord, you're going to be in business for a long time.” Kurtz: “Well, this is it. It's called AIDR. AI Detection and Response.” “And this is why it's a huge opportunity for us because on average each employee is going to have about 90 agents they control.” “So we're going to have protection and visibility across all of those agents, whether it's from a third party or whether it's a homegrown agent, and that is a massive TAM opportunity for us.” ------------------------------------ Thanks to our partner for making this happen!: On Public, you can invest in stocks, options, bonds, and crypto. Plus, build your own custom index with AI. Get started at — investing for those who take it seriously.

The All-In Podcast

109,038 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Maria Popova on the soul, the self, and what AI will never have: "AI will never have feeling. AI will have the simulacrum of feeling. AI will never write the great American poem, the great French poem, because it hasn't suffered. AI doesn't have the capacity to suffer. Even if you try to make it suffer, meaning write a command that is to execute failure, it'll already be succeeding at executing failure. AI can only ever succeed. And without suffering, what kind of true art can there be? All writing that is truly moving is born of feeling and time. AI has neither; it's an instantaneous, unfeeling delivery of pure information. The function of what we call the soul is real. Whatever it's made of, where it is. And the part that I worry about is that today, most people live on the level of the self and not the level of the soul. Just the costume of personality over the soul." The value of persons does not rest on our "costume of personality," but on the soul beneath it.

Maria Popova on the soul, the self, and what AI will never have: "AI will never have feeling. AI will have the simulacrum of feeling. AI will never write the great American poem, the great French poem, because it hasn't suffered. AI doesn't have the capacity to suffer. Even if you try to make it suffer, meaning write a command that is to execute failure, it'll already be succeeding at executing failure. AI can only ever succeed. And without suffering, what kind of true art can there be? All writing that is truly moving is born of feeling and time. AI has neither; it's an instantaneous, unfeeling delivery of pure information. The function of what we call the soul is real. Whatever it's made of, where it is. And the part that I worry about is that today, most people live on the level of the self and not the level of the soul. Just the costume of personality over the soul." The value of persons does not rest on our "costume of personality," but on the soul beneath it.

David Perell Clips

12,220 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten