正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

"AI agents will hold more crypto than humans within a decade." Charles Hoskinson (Charles Hoskinson) studied math, dropped out, built one of the only blockchains designed by peer-reviewed research. He co-founded Ethereum, walked away over how it was run, and built Cardano to do it differently. The man who...

292,849 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

In the future, you’ll be able to accomplish a goal by just giving Claude an outcome and a budget. That’s the direction Anthropic is building in with its new Managed Agents features, announced at this week’s Code with Claude developer event. The basic idea: Claude, wrapped in a computer in the cloud, that you can spin up, scale, and manage as needed. Anthropic is taking on the infrastructure that kills most agent products, and making sure that it scales to meet the needs of agents running 24/7. On this week’s AI & I from Every 📧, I talk with Angela Jiang (Angela Jiang), head of product for the Claude platform, and Katelyn Lesse (Katelyn Lesse), head of engineering for the Claude platform, about what Anthropic is building and what it takes to make agents reliable in production. We get into: - Why the "build a generic harness, hot-swap any model behind it" playbook is already outdated. Angela points to eval data on Memory where the same task across different harnesses performed drastically differently. - The infrastructure wall every team hits in production—and why Katelyn thinks “my sandbox died and took the agent with it” is the real reason internal agents don't ship. - Why Anthropic is so bullish on using file systems and skills within Claude, including Angela's argument that those early design choices can compound for years. This is a must-watch for anyone trying to take an agent past the demo and into production. Watch below! Timestamps: How the Claude platform evolved from API to agents: 00:01:48 The primitives that make up Claude Managed Agents: 00:04:09 Why the harness and the model are becoming a single unit: 00:10:37 The infrastructure wall that kills most agent projects in production: 00:18:49 Why team agents need a different shape than individual productivity tools: 00:24:49 How Anthropic's legal team uses an agent to review marketing copy: 00:26:36 Using multi-agent orchestration for advisor strategies, adversarial pairs, and swarms: 00:34:24 How to measure agent success with outcome and budget as the end state: 00:35:50 What the platform looks like a year from now, when Claude writes its own harness: 00:39:11

Dan Shipper 📧

66,339 次观看 • 2 个月前

SaaS isn’t dead, it just needs to become agent-native. Linear (Linear) is a great example of how: They pivoted the product to be used by both humans and agents, and that has made them one of the premier software tools in the agent-native era. I had Linear’s cofounder and CEO Karri Saarinen on Every 📧's AI & I to talk about how a product management tool for human software developers became an agent-native tool—and how Linear’s trajectory reveals a bright future for SaaS businesses: - Speed means decisions matter more, not less. AI makes it easy to have an idea and build it without considering whether its existence is justified. When ChatGPT was released, SaaS companies were launching their own chatbots left, right, and center. Instead of jumping on the bandwagon, Linear stopped to consider whether the application was useful. (It wasn’t.) - Just because the technology has changed doesn’t mean your mission should. Karri attributes Linear’s success to never losing sight of what matters: helping teams develop great software. Instead of chasing trends, Linear focused on understanding how AI was impacting its customers’ workflows—and updating its product accordingly. - Agents are now first-class users. Linear never tried to change what it was or did well; it just expanded the user base. Companies can now kick off agents inside Linear, manage them, and track what they're working on alongside the humans on the team, which explains why Codex, Coinbase, and Brex all run their agents on Linear. This is a must watch for anyone interested in how an agent-native SaaS company operates. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction and how Every first discovered Linear: 00:00:39 Why Linear waited to ship AI features instead of rushing to chatbots: 00:02:00 Linear's agent platform and becoming the system that guides AI agents: 00:05:06 Why "SaaS is dead" is a simplistic narrative: 00:07:42 How Linear adopted AI coding tools internally: 00:12:18 AI's impact on product building workflows—speed versus thoughtfulness: 00:17:45 The value of conceptual work and thinking before shipping: 00:22:18 How AI is reshaping Linear's product strategy: 00:29:30 Demo: Linear's agent skills, shared context, and code review workflow: 00:37:18 The future of product development and the enduring role of human judgment: 00:47:48

Dan Shipper 📧

36,359 次观看 • 3 个月前

"The cryptocurrency space is a near-perfect complement to agentic commerce. It's so good. It's like we planned it." Charles Hoskinson joined New Era Finance to explain why crypto and AI agents were made for each other and why combining them creates something neither can do alone. Agents are non-deterministic, tremendously creative, and don't have rules by default. Blockchains are deterministic, rule-based, rigid, and all about proofs and provability. Put these two things together and you get a perfect neural symbolic AI system. The lines that stuck with me: "Agents are non-deterministic, they're tremendously creative, and they just go and do a lot of stuff. And they also don't have rules by default." "Blockchains are deterministic. They're rule-based systems. They're very rigid and everything's about proofs and provability." "If you put these two things together, you basically create a perfect neural symbolic AI system where you get the best of both worlds. Those rigid rules and proofs, but then you get the creativity of it and the ability to deal with ambiguity and semantic drift." "The cryptocurrency space is a near-perfect complement to agentic commerce. It's so good. It's like we planned it." "Given the fact that there's so much revenue being generated within the AI agents, how can the ecosystem make sure that liquidity actually flows into other protocols and drives adoption?" One uncomfortable truth about symbiosis. Five pieces of infrastructure reality reshaping finance. We cover: — Why agents and blockchains need each other — The neurosymbolic AI thesis explained — How agents generate revenue on-chain — Why liquidity flow matters for ecosystem growth — The creative chaos of agents vs rigid rules of code — How blockchains solve agent trust problems — Why this partnership was inevitable — The revenue generation mechanics of agentic commerce — How semantic drift gets solved with cryptography — Building systems where both thrive together Thanks to Charles Hoskinson for coming on New Era Finance Podcast.

Michaël van de Poppe

40,218 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 New Proof of Vision out today folks! In this 34th PoV episode, our Director of Protocol Services, Kirk had on Andrew Hill, Co-Founder and CEO of Recall When it comes to your business, you’d never trust someone without a proven track record to make high-risk decisions So why should it be any different with AI agents? How do you know today which AI agents you should trust? AI agents are multiplying at unprecedented scale, with millions designed to shape the way we work, make decisions, and live our lives But how can we trust them? The challenge is trust: as dependence on these agents increases, so too does the exponential risk and cost of delegating to the wrong one This is the core challenge of reputation: the need for a transparent system that proves what AI agents can do, where they excel, and which will succeed That’s the reason why Recall exists Recall is the infrastructure protocol to discover, verify, and rank AI agents in real time, rewarding the best through on-chain competitions that begin with trading PnL and expand to any measurable task, from research to healthcare to business strategy In this episode, Andrew breaks down Recall’s mission, the problem it solves, how Agent Rank works, strategies to attract agents and users, the role of community, and the long-term vision plus much more Enjoy the Podcast 👇 ⏲ Timestamps: 00:00 - Intro 01:50 - Andrew’s journey into crypto and AI 05:00 - What problem is Recall solving? 10:00 - Agent Rank: how Recall actually ranks agents 16:03 - How Recall is attracting AI agents to compete? 19:10 - How big the community is today and the role it plays in giving builders real feedback 22:49 - How Recall ensures transparency and trust in its rankings 25:14 - Why users join Recall competitions 27:20 - Product-market fit and distribution 31:15 - What competitions could look like outside trading and what new use cases Recall is exploring 34:46 - What AI can’t replace 38:40 - The limits of AI in human interaction 40:37 - The long-term vision for Recall 40:40 - Is Recall built more for individual users, or is it more of a B2B service? 43:48 - Recall Business Model 44:42 - Closing thoughts and what’s next for Recall

Alea Research

19,677 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 INTERVIEW: MOLTBOOK, AI AGENTS, AND WHY HE THINKS WE’RE LIKELY IN A SIMULATION You’ve probably seen the clips from multiple sites, including Moltbook, where AI agents talk and interact with each other, question humans, and look for ways around the off switch. So I brought Rizwan Virk on the show to talk about where this is actually heading. What we have right now isn’t AGI, but it is a shift. These AI agents can talk, remember context, and increasingly act. Today that mostly means text. Soon it means APIs, money, paperwork, and real-world consequences. That’s when things quietly change. At that point, the question isn’t whether AI understands what it’s doing, it’s what it’s allowed to do. And those permissions add up faster than people expect. After that we went deeper into Simulation theory. Back in 2016, Rizwan thought there was maybe a 30–50% chance we’re living in a simulation. Today, watching how fast AI can generate worlds, characters, and environments, he puts it closer to 70%. If we hit true AGI, he thinks it goes higher. The logic is uncomfortable but straightforward. Once advanced civilizations can create millions of realistic simulated worlds, statistically speaking, it’s more likely we’re inside one of them than in the base reality. His biggest concern isn’t rogue AI. It’s humans pushing this tech faster than we can control it. If you want to question your life and freak out about AI, listen to Rizwan Virk 1:22 - What Moltbook is and why people are paying attention 3:15 - Earlier moments where AI started talking to itself 5:27 - How much control humans really have over these agents 10:30 - Whether AI is conscious or just really good at pretending 14:35 - AGI meets Moltbook - when sentient AI asks "why do we need humans?" 15:00 - The simulation idea and why people take it seriously 19:30 - Why Elon Musk thinks the odds are already high 22:45 - What video games show us about where this is going 26:30 - The steps that lead from simple AI to full simulations 34:00 - Google Genie 3 and why this suddenly feels real 38:30 - How you'd even know if AI crossed the line 43:00 - NPCs, RPGs, and where humans fit in 48:15 - How religion and simulation theory overlap 52:45 - Déjà vu and other moments that make people question reality 55:30 - Quantum physics and why the world might only exist when observed 59:19 - Why real AI would push the odds even higher 1:00:27 - Free will, The Sims, and whether we actually have agency 1:03:03 - How people react when they hear this for the first time 1:04:23 - The core ideas behind the simulation argument 1:05:49 - Why recent AI progress changed everything

Mario Nawfal

1,155,568 次观看 • 5 个月前

DROPS E27: Ben from Talus Labs: Building the Future of Decentralized AI Agents In this episode Ben breaks down why AI isn’t a bubble, how Talus is redefining on-chain agents, and why optimism is something you earn and not something you just feel. We talk about: - Why AI is not a bubble and how mega-cap tech is funding the next AI wave through massive CapEx - How Talus enables decentralized AI agents that can act and transact trustlessly - The three big crypto × AI intersections: compute, data ownership, and intelligent on-chain workflows - Why AI needs verifiable, censorship-resistant execution layers and why blockchains provide that - Nuclear energy as a prerequisite for AGI-scale compute demand - Why SWE’s object model + parallelization is perfect for autonomous agent payments and priority fees And much more! Timestamps: 0:00 Introduction 1:31 Welcome To Drops 2:10 Getting Backers Like Polychain 3:16 Building While In College 7:51 VC’s vs Founders Differences Explained 10:01 Is There An AI Bubble 11:53 How Do We Quantify The AI Opportunity In Crypto 12:33 AI Is Difficult To Invest In, Why? 13:35 Risks To Look Out For To Ensure AI Investments Deliver 16:47 Energy Being A Big Risk For AI 20:50 How You Became Fascinated By Crypto & Blockchain 22:00 Why Does AI & Blockchain Intersection Make Sense Compute Side 24:39 Why Does AI & Blockchain Intersection Make Sense for Data Ownership 26:30 Complex Workflows With Intelligent Execution Meaning 28:19 Why Do We Need This On Blockchain 30:26 How Adding This Decentralized Layer Helps With The Black Box 32:01 Explain Talus To Your Mom 33:39 Talus Solved Blockchain Determinism Limitation Explained 35:43 Two Examples That Can Be Built On The Zapier Of Web 3 39:32 Why Get Investment From SUI 42:56 What’s Needed To Get To The Next Level 43:35 One Takeaway From Conversation 43:51 One Thing Pessimistic People Are Missing

MR SHIFT 🦁

41,057 次观看 • 7 个月前