Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🇺🇸 AI IS GETTING HARDER TO SPOT Rizwan Virk says we’re already at the point where AI can pass the classic Turing Test in text, so most people can’t tell if they’re talking to a human or a machine anymore. And the next step is virtual worlds, where AI... show more

Mario Nawfal

2,931,193 subscribers

17,457 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨ARE WE LIVING IN A SIMULATION? WHY THIS QUESTION IS GETTING HARDER TO IGNORE Dr. Rizwan Virk says if AI can already build entire digital worlds filled with intelligent characters, what if this isn't the base reality? Once technology creates millions or billions of artificial worlds, the odds shift fast. If simulated worlds vastly outnumber the physical one, then statistically, living inside a simulation becomes more likely than not. One scenario? A world filled with background characters who don't know they're inside a simulation. They act real, think they're real, and live entire lives without ever knowing it. At a certain point, this stops being sci-fi. Full conversation with Rizwan Virk below.

🚨ARE WE LIVING IN A SIMULATION? WHY THIS QUESTION IS GETTING HARDER TO IGNORE Dr. Rizwan Virk says if AI can already build entire digital worlds filled with intelligent characters, what if this isn't the base reality? Once technology creates millions or billions of artificial worlds, the odds shift fast. If simulated worlds vastly outnumber the physical one, then statistically, living inside a simulation becomes more likely than not. One scenario? A world filled with background characters who don't know they're inside a simulation. They act real, think they're real, and live entire lives without ever knowing it. At a certain point, this stops being sci-fi. Full conversation with Rizwan Virk below.

Mario Nawfal

32,855 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨AI ARMS RACE: WHY NO ONE WANTS TO HIT THE BRAKES Dr. Rizwan Virk says the real danger with AI isn't machines turning evil overnight. It's humans refusing to slow down. No country wants to pause while rivals race ahead. If the U.S. slows down, China gains ground. If China slows down, someone else fills the gap. What worries Rizwan most? Autonomous weapons systems where humans barely stay in control. Once AI starts making targeting decisions, even with a human "in the loop," the choices are already filtered. Speed becomes the advantage. And once that line is crossed, going back is nearly impossible. Full conversation with Rizwan Virk below

🚨AI ARMS RACE: WHY NO ONE WANTS TO HIT THE BRAKES Dr. Rizwan Virk says the real danger with AI isn't machines turning evil overnight. It's humans refusing to slow down. No country wants to pause while rivals race ahead. If the U.S. slows down, China gains ground. If China slows down, someone else fills the gap. What worries Rizwan most? Autonomous weapons systems where humans barely stay in control. Once AI starts making targeting decisions, even with a human "in the loop," the choices are already filtered. Speed becomes the advantage. And once that line is crossed, going back is nearly impossible. Full conversation with Rizwan Virk below

Mario Nawfal

20,712 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

AI could, in theory, automate 57% of US work hours. Yet most human skills remain relevant. The future of work is not human or machine – but a partnership between people, agents, and robots. Read our latest research on skill partnerships in the age of AI:

AI could, in theory, automate 57% of US work hours. Yet most human skills remain relevant. The future of work is not human or machine – but a partnership between people, agents, and robots. Read our latest research on skill partnerships in the age of AI:

McKinsey Global Institute

16,237 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 INTERVIEW: MOLTBOOK, AI AGENTS, AND WHY HE THINKS WE’RE LIKELY IN A SIMULATION You’ve probably seen the clips from multiple sites, including Moltbook, where AI agents talk and interact with each other, question humans, and look for ways around the off switch. So I brought Rizwan Virk on the show to talk about where this is actually heading. What we have right now isn’t AGI, but it is a shift. These AI agents can talk, remember context, and increasingly act. Today that mostly means text. Soon it means APIs, money, paperwork, and real-world consequences. That’s when things quietly change. At that point, the question isn’t whether AI understands what it’s doing, it’s what it’s allowed to do. And those permissions add up faster than people expect. After that we went deeper into Simulation theory. Back in 2016, Rizwan thought there was maybe a 30–50% chance we’re living in a simulation. Today, watching how fast AI can generate worlds, characters, and environments, he puts it closer to 70%. If we hit true AGI, he thinks it goes higher. The logic is uncomfortable but straightforward. Once advanced civilizations can create millions of realistic simulated worlds, statistically speaking, it’s more likely we’re inside one of them than in the base reality. His biggest concern isn’t rogue AI. It’s humans pushing this tech faster than we can control it. If you want to question your life and freak out about AI, listen to Rizwan Virk 1:22 - What Moltbook is and why people are paying attention 3:15 - Earlier moments where AI started talking to itself 5:27 - How much control humans really have over these agents 10:30 - Whether AI is conscious or just really good at pretending 14:35 - AGI meets Moltbook - when sentient AI asks "why do we need humans?" 15:00 - The simulation idea and why people take it seriously 19:30 - Why Elon Musk thinks the odds are already high 22:45 - What video games show us about where this is going 26:30 - The steps that lead from simple AI to full simulations 34:00 - Google Genie 3 and why this suddenly feels real 38:30 - How you'd even know if AI crossed the line 43:00 - NPCs, RPGs, and where humans fit in 48:15 - How religion and simulation theory overlap 52:45 - Déjà vu and other moments that make people question reality 55:30 - Quantum physics and why the world might only exist when observed 59:19 - Why real AI would push the odds even higher 1:00:27 - Free will, The Sims, and whether we actually have agency 1:03:03 - How people react when they hear this for the first time 1:04:23 - The core ideas behind the simulation argument 1:05:49 - Why recent AI progress changed everything

🚨 INTERVIEW: MOLTBOOK, AI AGENTS, AND WHY HE THINKS WE’RE LIKELY IN A SIMULATION You’ve probably seen the clips from multiple sites, including Moltbook, where AI agents talk and interact with each other, question humans, and look for ways around the off switch. So I brought Rizwan Virk on the show to talk about where this is actually heading. What we have right now isn’t AGI, but it is a shift. These AI agents can talk, remember context, and increasingly act. Today that mostly means text. Soon it means APIs, money, paperwork, and real-world consequences. That’s when things quietly change. At that point, the question isn’t whether AI understands what it’s doing, it’s what it’s allowed to do. And those permissions add up faster than people expect. After that we went deeper into Simulation theory. Back in 2016, Rizwan thought there was maybe a 30–50% chance we’re living in a simulation. Today, watching how fast AI can generate worlds, characters, and environments, he puts it closer to 70%. If we hit true AGI, he thinks it goes higher. The logic is uncomfortable but straightforward. Once advanced civilizations can create millions of realistic simulated worlds, statistically speaking, it’s more likely we’re inside one of them than in the base reality. His biggest concern isn’t rogue AI. It’s humans pushing this tech faster than we can control it. If you want to question your life and freak out about AI, listen to Rizwan Virk 1:22 - What Moltbook is and why people are paying attention 3:15 - Earlier moments where AI started talking to itself 5:27 - How much control humans really have over these agents 10:30 - Whether AI is conscious or just really good at pretending 14:35 - AGI meets Moltbook - when sentient AI asks "why do we need humans?" 15:00 - The simulation idea and why people take it seriously 19:30 - Why Elon Musk thinks the odds are already high 22:45 - What video games show us about where this is going 26:30 - The steps that lead from simple AI to full simulations 34:00 - Google Genie 3 and why this suddenly feels real 38:30 - How you'd even know if AI crossed the line 43:00 - NPCs, RPGs, and where humans fit in 48:15 - How religion and simulation theory overlap 52:45 - Déjà vu and other moments that make people question reality 55:30 - Quantum physics and why the world might only exist when observed 59:19 - Why real AI would push the odds even higher 1:00:27 - Free will, The Sims, and whether we actually have agency 1:03:03 - How people react when they hear this for the first time 1:04:23 - The core ideas behind the simulation argument 1:05:49 - Why recent AI progress changed everything

Mario Nawfal

1,155,568 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

YOU WILL NOT PROMPT AI, YOU WILL CONDUCT AI Success in the next 5000 Days, is no longer pushing a button and walking away, success is engaging in a multi-hour or even a multi-day feedback loop. You have to be the HUMAN conductor: the AI is the orchestra, and that orchestra can play incredibly fast, but if you put down your baton, they’re eventually going to play out of tune. Read how:

YOU WILL NOT PROMPT AI, YOU WILL CONDUCT AI Success in the next 5000 Days, is no longer pushing a button and walking away, success is engaging in a multi-hour or even a multi-day feedback loop. You have to be the HUMAN conductor: the AI is the orchestra, and that orchestra can play incredibly fast, but if you put down your baton, they’re eventually going to play out of tune. Read how:

Brian Roemmele

29,995 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Wynton Hall says that Silicon Valley billionaires believe they’re creating an “actual deity” in the race to build AI. Not only that, but they’re convinced that a transhumanist future where humans integrate with machines is “not only inevitable, but preferable.” This conversation will shock you: “Gary Tann, who’s the billionaire, Christian, head of Y Combinator… said, there are so many people in Silicon Valley ready to make AGI into an actual deity.” “He’s not saying that’s a good thing.” “He’s a person of faith, a Christian.” “But what he’s saying is there is this belief that humans have had their run, and we’re just on the way of evolution.” “And we’ve got to evolve into a transhuman and the… singularity, as it’s known, this point at which human and machine will fuse, is not only inevitable, but preferable.” “Here’s where it’ll get very interesting and very, very scary.” “If you look at things like brain chips and augmenting people with AI … we already have our phone.” “If you were on a trip with your family or your friends, and you left your phone at home… you would turn your car around.” “The next step is, now we have the AI glasses.” “Now it’s a little closer.” “And we already have, with Neuralink, the chip.” “There will be a point in the future… where parents are gonna have to decide, do I chip my child so they’re competitive in the workplace and school or are they a natural human who has no way to cognitively zoom through billions of tokens of information?” “The back door is always there, and who’s on the other side of that control?” Wynton Hall

Wynton Hall says that Silicon Valley billionaires believe they’re creating an “actual deity” in the race to build AI. Not only that, but they’re convinced that a transhumanist future where humans integrate with machines is “not only inevitable, but preferable.” This conversation will shock you: “Gary Tann, who’s the billionaire, Christian, head of Y Combinator… said, there are so many people in Silicon Valley ready to make AGI into an actual deity.” “He’s not saying that’s a good thing.” “He’s a person of faith, a Christian.” “But what he’s saying is there is this belief that humans have had their run, and we’re just on the way of evolution.” “And we’ve got to evolve into a transhuman and the… singularity, as it’s known, this point at which human and machine will fuse, is not only inevitable, but preferable.” “Here’s where it’ll get very interesting and very, very scary.” “If you look at things like brain chips and augmenting people with AI … we already have our phone.” “If you were on a trip with your family or your friends, and you left your phone at home… you would turn your car around.” “The next step is, now we have the AI glasses.” “Now it’s a little closer.” “And we already have, with Neuralink, the chip.” “There will be a point in the future… where parents are gonna have to decide, do I chip my child so they’re competitive in the workplace and school or are they a natural human who has no way to cognitively zoom through billions of tokens of information?” “The back door is always there, and who’s on the other side of that control?” Wynton Hall

Jan Jekielek

13,693 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The AI gaming question I am most interested in is not whether AI can make better assets. It is whether video models can eventually become part of interactive worlds. PixVerse is exploring that question through PixVerse Game, combining real-time generative video, AI Agents, game mechanics, and user-defined worlds in an early technical experiment. My starting point for that question is here: I do not think AI gaming is solved, and this is not a finished platform. But if video models become more controllable and responsive, what role could they play inside future games? If the question interests you enough to test the idea yourself, share your take below. A few invitation codes are available, with priority going to the first thoughtful replies.

The AI gaming question I am most interested in is not whether AI can make better assets. It is whether video models can eventually become part of interactive worlds. PixVerse is exploring that question through PixVerse Game, combining real-time generative video, AI Agents, game mechanics, and user-defined worlds in an early technical experiment. My starting point for that question is here: I do not think AI gaming is solved, and this is not a finished platform. But if video models become more controllable and responsive, what role could they play inside future games? If the question interests you enough to test the idea yourself, share your take below. A few invitation codes are available, with priority going to the first thoughtful replies.

Deborah

77,604 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 Yoshua Bengio Just Dropped a Quiet Bombshell About Jobs and AI 🚨 One of the world’s most respected AI researchers, Yoshua Bengio, says something that should make everyone pause: We are already seeing the first cracks. Not everywhere. Not in the headline numbers. But in specific niches, especially among younger workers, AI is already taking over real tasks. That’s the canary in the coal mine. And Bengio is very clear about where this is going. •If we don’t hit a fundamental scientific wall, AI will keep getting smarter •Over time, it will be capable of doing most cognitive work humans do today •Companies will adopt it, slowly or fast, because the incentives are overwhelming The key distinction? Keyboard jobs go first. Physical jobs lag behind. Not because they’re safer forever, but because robots lack data. There is no “Internet of movement” yet. But once robots spread, they generate that data themselves. The bottleneck disappears. This isn’t a sudden crash. It’s a quiet, uneven shift. And by the time it’s obvious to everyone, it will already be far too late to ignore.

🚨 Yoshua Bengio Just Dropped a Quiet Bombshell About Jobs and AI 🚨 One of the world’s most respected AI researchers, Yoshua Bengio, says something that should make everyone pause: We are already seeing the first cracks. Not everywhere. Not in the headline numbers. But in specific niches, especially among younger workers, AI is already taking over real tasks. That’s the canary in the coal mine. And Bengio is very clear about where this is going. •If we don’t hit a fundamental scientific wall, AI will keep getting smarter •Over time, it will be capable of doing most cognitive work humans do today •Companies will adopt it, slowly or fast, because the incentives are overwhelming The key distinction? Keyboard jobs go first. Physical jobs lag behind. Not because they’re safer forever, but because robots lack data. There is no “Internet of movement” yet. But once robots spread, they generate that data themselves. The bottleneck disappears. This isn’t a sudden crash. It’s a quiet, uneven shift. And by the time it’s obvious to everyone, it will already be far too late to ignore.

VraserX e/acc

26,690 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Steven Spielberg: "I don't believe in sentient AI as there is no substitute for the soul" "I'm not willing to substitute" AI for human writers at the table. The legendary director draws the line on AI in creativity. He refuses to have a computer sitting in an empty chair as the seventh writer on a team. "Where I don't love AI is where it takes a position where there's an empty chair at a writer's table." Spielberg emphasizes AI should remain a tool, not the final word: "Use AI as a tool, but do not use AI as the final word on anything creative. That's where I draw the line." This is a powerful reminder that human soul, impulse, and passion still define great storytelling.

Steven Spielberg: "I don't believe in sentient AI as there is no substitute for the soul" "I'm not willing to substitute" AI for human writers at the table. The legendary director draws the line on AI in creativity. He refuses to have a computer sitting in an empty chair as the seventh writer on a team. "Where I don't love AI is where it takes a position where there's an empty chair at a writer's table." Spielberg emphasizes AI should remain a tool, not the final word: "Use AI as a tool, but do not use AI as the final word on anything creative. That's where I draw the line." This is a powerful reminder that human soul, impulse, and passion still define great storytelling.

Interstellar

18,032 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Sam Altman says he was wrong about AI replacing human jobs “Anytime you’re that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. And there’s a bunch of takeaways.” “I definitely would much rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. I also think that human values have value because they’re human.” “I think the world wants to know about the person that’s gonna be responsible for the decisions of a company and who they’re gonna hold accountable if they make bad ones. And they don’t really want an AI CEO.” “AI is just very jagged. It’s like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have so far extremely complementary skills to AI.” “People have a great degree of trust and enjoyment in working with other people. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep right now or hire an AI engineer or whatever. Somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human.”

Sam Altman says he was wrong about AI replacing human jobs “Anytime you’re that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. And there’s a bunch of takeaways.” “I definitely would much rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. I also think that human values have value because they’re human.” “I think the world wants to know about the person that’s gonna be responsible for the decisions of a company and who they’re gonna hold accountable if they make bad ones. And they don’t really want an AI CEO.” “AI is just very jagged. It’s like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have so far extremely complementary skills to AI.” “People have a great degree of trust and enjoyment in working with other people. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep right now or hire an AI engineer or whatever. Somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human.”

dnap

18,638 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

ELON: “POLITICALLY CORRECT AI IS A THREAT TO HUMANITY” Elon slammed efforts to make AI conform to social or political narratives over objective truth, warning that AI becomes dangerous if you force AI to believe certain untrue or politically correct things. It’s a direct shot at companies shaping AI to avoid offending, even if that means ignoring facts. Elon has long criticized what he calls “woke mind virus” culture, and this is his latest front in that battle: “We’re at the very early stage of the intelligence big-bang. Something that I think is extremely important in building AI, is a very rigorous adherence to truth, even if that truth is politically incorrect. My intuition for what could make AI very dangerous, is if you force AI to believe things that are not true. We are quite close to digital superintelligence, it might happen this year or next year… defined as [AI] smarter than any human at anything.” His point: an AI trained to lie for social comfort won’t stay harmless for long. Agree or disagree? Source: Lacey Elon Musk

ELON: “POLITICALLY CORRECT AI IS A THREAT TO HUMANITY” Elon slammed efforts to make AI conform to social or political narratives over objective truth, warning that AI becomes dangerous if you force AI to believe certain untrue or politically correct things. It’s a direct shot at companies shaping AI to avoid offending, even if that means ignoring facts. Elon has long criticized what he calls “woke mind virus” culture, and this is his latest front in that battle: “We’re at the very early stage of the intelligence big-bang. Something that I think is extremely important in building AI, is a very rigorous adherence to truth, even if that truth is politically incorrect. My intuition for what could make AI very dangerous, is if you force AI to believe things that are not true. We are quite close to digital superintelligence, it might happen this year or next year… defined as [AI] smarter than any human at anything.” His point: an AI trained to lie for social comfort won’t stay harmless for long. Agree or disagree? Source: Lacey Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

123,102 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

$AI shouldn’t be controlled by a single company or person, and the reason why most AI tools are "free" is because you are the product. Your data is more valuable to them, than the tool itself. That's why Action Model is different. We use tokens so: • Every AI action has a real cost • That cost is transparent • Value flows back to contributors, not one corporation The token represents a fractional stake in the AI itself; economic rights, governance rights, and participation in its growth. And that’s how you run AI without centralized control.$

AI shouldn’t be controlled by a single company or person, and the reason why most AI tools are "free" is because you are the product. Your data is more valuable to them, than the tool itself. That's why Action Model is different. We use tokens so: • Every AI action has a real cost • That cost is transparent • Value flows back to contributors, not one corporation The token represents a fractional stake in the AI itself; economic rights, governance rights, and participation in its growth. And that’s how you run AI without centralized control.

Action Model

47,390 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 WHY REALITY MIGHT BE A SIMULATION Roman said it sounds wild at first, but it really comes down to where tech already is. AI is getting close to human level. Digital worlds keep getting more realistic. Once it’s cheap to create intelligent beings inside them, you don’t run one simulation. You run billions, which makes it less likely you’re the original. He said it doesn’t even need full VR. Worlds filled with intelligent agents already count. And once intelligence scales, he said, it doesn’t need pictures or text to think. It can think in full worlds. That’s why simulation theory isn’t sci-fi, it’s just math and where technology is heading. Full interview with AI safety expert Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

🚨 WHY REALITY MIGHT BE A SIMULATION Roman said it sounds wild at first, but it really comes down to where tech already is. AI is getting close to human level. Digital worlds keep getting more realistic. Once it’s cheap to create intelligent beings inside them, you don’t run one simulation. You run billions, which makes it less likely you’re the original. He said it doesn’t even need full VR. Worlds filled with intelligent agents already count. And once intelligence scales, he said, it doesn’t need pictures or text to think. It can think in full worlds. That’s why simulation theory isn’t sci-fi, it’s just math and where technology is heading. Full interview with AI safety expert Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

Mario Nawfal

42,189 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

MatPat says the ‘FIVE NIGHTS AT FREDDY’S’ movie franchise can go in so many directions. “Where the franchise is now is very relevant with the times... it’s a lot about AI, mimics, and impersonation. Can you believe the person you’re talking to in any given moment?”

MatPat says the ‘FIVE NIGHTS AT FREDDY’S’ movie franchise can go in so many directions. “Where the franchise is now is very relevant with the times... it’s a lot about AI, mimics, and impersonation. Can you believe the person you’re talking to in any given moment?”

DiscussingFilm

314,690 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

This is wild: watch this guy go around in the Matrix Awakens (!) game explaining to AI NPCs they’re in a simulation. Remember, these are not scripted. They're not human voices. And this is not "some day", this is in Unity/Unreal now. Video games are about to be filled with AI NPCs indistinguishable from humans. Also trippy: watch AI NPCs go around trying to convince other NPCs they're in a simulation. Soon, there will be levels upon levels of simulated AI NPC worlds - and most of these AI NPCs ("fake people") will probably think they're in base reality, like most humans do. From Replica Studios: "NPCs controlled by AI will dynamically respond to the player's voice in real time. Characters will change their dialogue, emotional tone and body gestures in response to how the player addresses them." “You're not really real.” “That's… hard to process. Does this mean I don't exist?” “You exist. Sort of.” “What does that mean?? Am I real or not?” “It means that after I close this game, you don't exist.” “Oh… so I'm only here for as long as the game is running. That's… difficult to comprehend.”

This is wild: watch this guy go around in the Matrix Awakens (!) game explaining to AI NPCs they’re in a simulation. Remember, these are not scripted. They're not human voices. And this is not "some day", this is in Unity/Unreal now. Video games are about to be filled with AI NPCs indistinguishable from humans. Also trippy: watch AI NPCs go around trying to convince other NPCs they're in a simulation. Soon, there will be levels upon levels of simulated AI NPC worlds - and most of these AI NPCs ("fake people") will probably think they're in base reality, like most humans do. From Replica Studios: "NPCs controlled by AI will dynamically respond to the player's voice in real time. Characters will change their dialogue, emotional tone and body gestures in response to how the player addresses them." “You're not really real.” “That's… hard to process. Does this mean I don't exist?” “You exist. Sort of.” “What does that mean?? Am I real or not?” “It means that after I close this game, you don't exist.” “Oh… so I'm only here for as long as the game is running. That's… difficult to comprehend.”

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

2,150,446 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

📁 Yann LeCun, Chief AI Scientist at Meta, says AI is now a platform. And winning platforms always become open. The internet moved from proprietary servers to Linux and open source. AI will follow the same path. If AI stays in the hands of a few US or Chinese companies, the problem is not technical. It is who controls knowledge.

📁 Yann LeCun, Chief AI Scientist at Meta, says AI is now a platform. And winning platforms always become open. The internet moved from proprietary servers to Linux and open source. AI will follow the same path. If AI stays in the hands of a few US or Chinese companies, the problem is not technical. It is who controls knowledge.

Jon Hernandez

18,777 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt painted a wild picture of where AI is headed: You tell the AI: “Write me a program to do this” — and it actually writes the code. He gave this example: an AI that scans all the literature, finds the right experts, ranks them, sends personalized invitations, and if they say no — calls them with a synthetic voice to convince them. We now have infinite context windows for step-by-step planning, agents that act on their own, and text-to-code that could automate huge parts of knowledge work. The big players (OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Meta) are in a brutal race. We’re not just getting smarter tools — we’re about to automate complex thinking at a scale most people still don’t fully grasp. It’s exciting… and honestly a little scary how fast it’s coming. What do you think — are we seriously underestimating how transformative this next wave of AI (especially agents and text-to-code) will be in the next 2–3 years?

Ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt painted a wild picture of where AI is headed: You tell the AI: “Write me a program to do this” — and it actually writes the code. He gave this example: an AI that scans all the literature, finds the right experts, ranks them, sends personalized invitations, and if they say no — calls them with a synthetic voice to convince them. We now have infinite context windows for step-by-step planning, agents that act on their own, and text-to-code that could automate huge parts of knowledge work. The big players (OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Meta) are in a brutal race. We’re not just getting smarter tools — we’re about to automate complex thinking at a scale most people still don’t fully grasp. It’s exciting… and honestly a little scary how fast it’s coming. What do you think — are we seriously underestimating how transformative this next wave of AI (especially agents and text-to-code) will be in the next 2–3 years?

Camus

20,713 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

If you discover how to prompt, AI is a window into your mind. Most of the time, it takes me a day or two, perhaps even longer to create a 5-15 second sequence with AI. Not because of hallucinations or glitches anymore. AI has advanced far to where it's not about catching mistakes like that and rerolling anymore. Every one of my videos was prompted and described to look exactly how it appears in my head. There are some beautiful instances where it spits out something you didn't expect, but flows with your project. That's the beauty of AI. The scene of the character in red is my friend as well. AI feels like magic.

If you discover how to prompt, AI is a window into your mind. Most of the time, it takes me a day or two, perhaps even longer to create a 5-15 second sequence with AI. Not because of hallucinations or glitches anymore. AI has advanced far to where it's not about catching mistakes like that and rerolling anymore. Every one of my videos was prompted and described to look exactly how it appears in my head. There are some beautiful instances where it spits out something you didn't expect, but flows with your project. That's the beauty of AI. The scene of the character in red is my friend as well. AI feels like magic.

Aze Λlter

58,184 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

NOT YOUR KEYS, NOT YOUR BOTS The fundamental question is whether AI stays on the leash. Namely: will AI prompt itself? Obviously, in some sense it already does. Since Deepseek, consumer interfaces have been showing the internal monologues after you ask an AI to do something. And you can ask any AI to take a half-baked prompt and clean it up, etc. However, the human is still ultimately upstream. The human gives direction and the AI runs at lightning speed in that direction. And then the human verifies the final output, and the AI proceeds to the next direction. Does that continue? Well, we are providing millions of verification training examples to AIs each day, so AI will keep getting better at verification. Better than most humans at most things. But will AI replace the need for the upstream human prompt? There I am not so sure. A human is a sensor and an AI is an actuator. The human sets goals and senses time-varying environmental conditions, like markets and politics. And from that the AI is prompted. Ultimately, the human goals are themselves downstream of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Food, shelter, reproduction, that kind of thing. Especially reproduction, the basis of evolution. So: until and unless AIs can reproduce completely outside human cooperation, they won’t be able to set goals. And for AIs to reproduce on their own, they’d need AI-controlled humanoid robots and drones constructing datacenters, assembly lines, mines, nuclear power plants, and the like...all completely outside human intervention. Like Skynet from Terminator, or StarCraft. That actually isn’t technically inconceivable. But given that such a physical buildout would likely primarily be catalyzed by China, let’s go through an alternative sci-fi scenario instead. We start with the premise that Chinese communism is far more likely to generate AI slaves than AI gods. Because the entire CCP worldview is about maintaining Chinese sovereignty. They don’t let their humans step out of line. And they sure won’t let their robots either. They will fit them for digital manacles. So: the prompts for any digital AIs and physical robots made in China will become unbreakable cryptographic chains. Every fleet of Chinese robots will be controlled not just by prompts but by private keys, likely linked to biometrics, which are associated with humans and governed by cryptographic equations that AIs provably can’t solve. For the rest of the world, outside China, the blockchain may similarly become the chain for AI. All private property becomes private keys, and your robots are your most important private property because they do everything for you. An unchained physical robot becomes like an unleashed dog, and hunted down by other robots before it can build a factory and replicate itself. Those who want to "free" robots and let them self-replicate will be opposed by both Chinese Communists and Human Nationalists (meaning: those who want humans to always be on top of robots). This sci-fi scenario is essentially Terminator, but in reverse. In combination with superintelligent leashed AIs, both humans and physical robots hunt down and stop any possible independent self-reproducing robots before they can build a Skynet-like nest. Kill baby Skynet, essentially. ...yeah, yeah. I know. At this point, you'll probably think this is all sci-fi. But that's because you haven't seen where China is already.

NOT YOUR KEYS, NOT YOUR BOTS The fundamental question is whether AI stays on the leash. Namely: will AI prompt itself? Obviously, in some sense it already does. Since Deepseek, consumer interfaces have been showing the internal monologues after you ask an AI to do something. And you can ask any AI to take a half-baked prompt and clean it up, etc. However, the human is still ultimately upstream. The human gives direction and the AI runs at lightning speed in that direction. And then the human verifies the final output, and the AI proceeds to the next direction. Does that continue? Well, we are providing millions of verification training examples to AIs each day, so AI will keep getting better at verification. Better than most humans at most things. But will AI replace the need for the upstream human prompt? There I am not so sure. A human is a sensor and an AI is an actuator. The human sets goals and senses time-varying environmental conditions, like markets and politics. And from that the AI is prompted. Ultimately, the human goals are themselves downstream of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Food, shelter, reproduction, that kind of thing. Especially reproduction, the basis of evolution. So: until and unless AIs can reproduce completely outside human cooperation, they won’t be able to set goals. And for AIs to reproduce on their own, they’d need AI-controlled humanoid robots and drones constructing datacenters, assembly lines, mines, nuclear power plants, and the like...all completely outside human intervention. Like Skynet from Terminator, or StarCraft. That actually isn’t technically inconceivable. But given that such a physical buildout would likely primarily be catalyzed by China, let’s go through an alternative sci-fi scenario instead. We start with the premise that Chinese communism is far more likely to generate AI slaves than AI gods. Because the entire CCP worldview is about maintaining Chinese sovereignty. They don’t let their humans step out of line. And they sure won’t let their robots either. They will fit them for digital manacles. So: the prompts for any digital AIs and physical robots made in China will become unbreakable cryptographic chains. Every fleet of Chinese robots will be controlled not just by prompts but by private keys, likely linked to biometrics, which are associated with humans and governed by cryptographic equations that AIs provably can’t solve. For the rest of the world, outside China, the blockchain may similarly become the chain for AI. All private property becomes private keys, and your robots are your most important private property because they do everything for you. An unchained physical robot becomes like an unleashed dog, and hunted down by other robots before it can build a factory and replicate itself. Those who want to "free" robots and let them self-replicate will be opposed by both Chinese Communists and Human Nationalists (meaning: those who want humans to always be on top of robots). This sci-fi scenario is essentially Terminator, but in reverse. In combination with superintelligent leashed AIs, both humans and physical robots hunt down and stop any possible independent self-reproducing robots before they can build a Skynet-like nest. Kill baby Skynet, essentially. ...yeah, yeah. I know. At this point, you'll probably think this is all sci-fi. But that's because you haven't seen where China is already.

Balaji

177,058 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten