Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 WHY REALITY MIGHT BE A SIMULATION Roman said it sounds wild at first, but it really comes down to where tech already is. AI is getting close to human level. Digital worlds keep getting more realistic. Once it’s cheap to create intelligent beings inside them, you don’t run...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

2,960,036 subscribers

42,189 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildungWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨ARE WE LIVING IN A SIMULATION? WHY THIS QUESTION IS GETTING HARDER TO IGNORE Dr. Rizwan Virk says if AI can already build entire digital worlds filled with intelligent characters, what if this isn't the base reality? Once technology creates millions or billions of artificial worlds, the odds shift fast. If simulated worlds vastly outnumber the physical one, then statistically, living inside a simulation becomes more likely than not. One scenario? A world filled with background characters who don't know they're inside a simulation. They act real, think they're real, and live entire lives without ever knowing it. At a certain point, this stops being sci-fi. Full conversation with Rizwan Virk below.
5:22

🚨ARE WE LIVING IN A SIMULATION? WHY THIS QUESTION IS GETTING HARDER TO IGNORE Dr. Rizwan Virk says if AI can already build entire digital worlds filled with intelligent characters, what if this isn't the base reality? Once technology creates millions or billions of artificial worlds, the odds shift fast. If simulated worlds vastly outnumber the physical one, then statistically, living inside a simulation becomes more likely than not. One scenario? A world filled with background characters who don't know they're inside a simulation. They act real, think they're real, and live entire lives without ever knowing it. At a certain point, this stops being sci-fi. Full conversation with Rizwan Virk below.

Mario Nawfal

32,855 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 WHY LAWS WON’T STOP SUPERINTELLIGENCE Roman said some governments, like the UK and Canada, that are paying attention, but he doesn’t think laws will stop AI, because making things illegal doesn’t actually stop anything. He said the people building these systems need to think about what “winning” the AI arms race really means, because if it goes wrong, it hurts them first, their safety, their families, their future, even though there’s still plenty of money to be made just by automating what already exists. And even then, the risk doesn’t just go away. Hardware keeps getting cheaper, AI keeps getting easier to build, and slowing things down doesn’t stop it, it just buys time, which still matters. Full interview with AI expert safety Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below
2:45

🚨 WHY LAWS WON’T STOP SUPERINTELLIGENCE Roman said some governments, like the UK and Canada, that are paying attention, but he doesn’t think laws will stop AI, because making things illegal doesn’t actually stop anything. He said the people building these systems need to think about what “winning” the AI arms race really means, because if it goes wrong, it hurts them first, their safety, their families, their future, even though there’s still plenty of money to be made just by automating what already exists. And even then, the risk doesn’t just go away. Hardware keeps getting cheaper, AI keeps getting easier to build, and slowing things down doesn’t stop it, it just buys time, which still matters. Full interview with AI expert safety Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

Mario Nawfal

23,516 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 Roman Yampolsky: "We are DEFINITELY living in a simulation - the probability is pretty close to 100%" 😱 AI safety legend Roman Yampolskiy just broke it down: “I know never to say 100% but pretty close to that.” He’s got the paper too “How to Hack the Simulation.” His big question: Can superintelligent agents jailbreak out of their virtual box? Elon Musk’s one question to AGI? “What’s outside the simulation?” What if this whole reality is just a test… and the real challenge is realizing the world isn’t real? Have you ever felt the glitches? Do you think we can actually escape? What would YOU ask once you broke out? Drop your wildest theory below 👇
7:54

🚨 Roman Yampolsky: "We are DEFINITELY living in a simulation - the probability is pretty close to 100%" 😱 AI safety legend Roman Yampolskiy just broke it down: “I know never to say 100% but pretty close to that.” He’s got the paper too “How to Hack the Simulation.” His big question: Can superintelligent agents jailbreak out of their virtual box? Elon Musk’s one question to AGI? “What’s outside the simulation?” What if this whole reality is just a test… and the real challenge is realizing the world isn’t real? Have you ever felt the glitches? Do you think we can actually escape? What would YOU ask once you broke out? Drop your wildest theory below 👇

Interstellar

152,955 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 INTERVIEW: MOLTBOOK, AI AGENTS, AND WHY HE THINKS WE’RE LIKELY IN A SIMULATION You’ve probably seen the clips from multiple sites, including Moltbook, where AI agents talk and interact with each other, question humans, and look for ways around the off switch. So I brought Rizwan Virk on the show to talk about where this is actually heading. What we have right now isn’t AGI, but it is a shift. These AI agents can talk, remember context, and increasingly act. Today that mostly means text. Soon it means APIs, money, paperwork, and real-world consequences. That’s when things quietly change. At that point, the question isn’t whether AI understands what it’s doing, it’s what it’s allowed to do. And those permissions add up faster than people expect. After that we went deeper into Simulation theory. Back in 2016, Rizwan thought there was maybe a 30–50% chance we’re living in a simulation. Today, watching how fast AI can generate worlds, characters, and environments, he puts it closer to 70%. If we hit true AGI, he thinks it goes higher. The logic is uncomfortable but straightforward. Once advanced civilizations can create millions of realistic simulated worlds, statistically speaking, it’s more likely we’re inside one of them than in the base reality. His biggest concern isn’t rogue AI. It’s humans pushing this tech faster than we can control it. If you want to question your life and freak out about AI, listen to Rizwan Virk 1:22 - What Moltbook is and why people are paying attention 3:15 - Earlier moments where AI started talking to itself 5:27 - How much control humans really have over these agents 10:30 - Whether AI is conscious or just really good at pretending 14:35 - AGI meets Moltbook - when sentient AI asks "why do we need humans?" 15:00 - The simulation idea and why people take it seriously 19:30 - Why Elon Musk thinks the odds are already high 22:45 - What video games show us about where this is going 26:30 - The steps that lead from simple AI to full simulations 34:00 - Google Genie 3 and why this suddenly feels real 38:30 - How you'd even know if AI crossed the line 43:00 - NPCs, RPGs, and where humans fit in 48:15 - How religion and simulation theory overlap 52:45 - Déjà vu and other moments that make people question reality 55:30 - Quantum physics and why the world might only exist when observed 59:19 - Why real AI would push the odds even higher 1:00:27 - Free will, The Sims, and whether we actually have agency 1:03:03 - How people react when they hear this for the first time 1:04:23 - The core ideas behind the simulation argument 1:05:49 - Why recent AI progress changed everything
1:06:33

🚨 INTERVIEW: MOLTBOOK, AI AGENTS, AND WHY HE THINKS WE’RE LIKELY IN A SIMULATION You’ve probably seen the clips from multiple sites, including Moltbook, where AI agents talk and interact with each other, question humans, and look for ways around the off switch. So I brought Rizwan Virk on the show to talk about where this is actually heading. What we have right now isn’t AGI, but it is a shift. These AI agents can talk, remember context, and increasingly act. Today that mostly means text. Soon it means APIs, money, paperwork, and real-world consequences. That’s when things quietly change. At that point, the question isn’t whether AI understands what it’s doing, it’s what it’s allowed to do. And those permissions add up faster than people expect. After that we went deeper into Simulation theory. Back in 2016, Rizwan thought there was maybe a 30–50% chance we’re living in a simulation. Today, watching how fast AI can generate worlds, characters, and environments, he puts it closer to 70%. If we hit true AGI, he thinks it goes higher. The logic is uncomfortable but straightforward. Once advanced civilizations can create millions of realistic simulated worlds, statistically speaking, it’s more likely we’re inside one of them than in the base reality. His biggest concern isn’t rogue AI. It’s humans pushing this tech faster than we can control it. If you want to question your life and freak out about AI, listen to Rizwan Virk 1:22 - What Moltbook is and why people are paying attention 3:15 - Earlier moments where AI started talking to itself 5:27 - How much control humans really have over these agents 10:30 - Whether AI is conscious or just really good at pretending 14:35 - AGI meets Moltbook - when sentient AI asks "why do we need humans?" 15:00 - The simulation idea and why people take it seriously 19:30 - Why Elon Musk thinks the odds are already high 22:45 - What video games show us about where this is going 26:30 - The steps that lead from simple AI to full simulations 34:00 - Google Genie 3 and why this suddenly feels real 38:30 - How you'd even know if AI crossed the line 43:00 - NPCs, RPGs, and where humans fit in 48:15 - How religion and simulation theory overlap 52:45 - Déjà vu and other moments that make people question reality 55:30 - Quantum physics and why the world might only exist when observed 59:19 - Why real AI would push the odds even higher 1:00:27 - Free will, The Sims, and whether we actually have agency 1:03:03 - How people react when they hear this for the first time 1:04:23 - The core ideas behind the simulation argument 1:05:49 - Why recent AI progress changed everything

Mario Nawfal

1,155,568 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨TURNING AI OFF ISN'T AN OPTION... IT WILL TURN YOU OFF FIRST Dr. Roman Yampolskiy says every AI safety solution fails when you think it through. Can't turn it off. It's smarter than you and will predict you're trying to shut it down. It has backups. Raising it like a child doesn't work either. Even humans who are biologically aligned with us can become psychopaths. Worse? We're not dealing with a baby. AI already has access to all knowledge in the world. Roman's solution? Don't create general superintelligence at all. Stick to narrow AI tools for specific problems like protein folding or disease cures. The moment you create general agents as a replacement for humanity, there's no obvious reason we benefit from being replaced. Full interview with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below
4:30

🚨TURNING AI OFF ISN'T AN OPTION... IT WILL TURN YOU OFF FIRST Dr. Roman Yampolskiy says every AI safety solution fails when you think it through. Can't turn it off. It's smarter than you and will predict you're trying to shut it down. It has backups. Raising it like a child doesn't work either. Even humans who are biologically aligned with us can become psychopaths. Worse? We're not dealing with a baby. AI already has access to all knowledge in the world. Roman's solution? Don't create general superintelligence at all. Stick to narrow AI tools for specific problems like protein folding or disease cures. The moment you create general agents as a replacement for humanity, there's no obvious reason we benefit from being replaced. Full interview with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

Mario Nawfal

33,805 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

AI expert Dr. Roman Yampolskiy says Elon Musk knows super intelligence could eventually threaten humanity after once calling it “summoning a demon,” but chose to become a top AI player when he realized it was going to be built anyway. Dr. Roman: "If we build general super intelligence, at some point, it will decide to do something that is not compatible with our survival." PBD: "Do you think Elon knows this?" Dr. Roman: "He knows everything; he's very well informed. He was one of the early people to fund AI safety research." "He was the biggest opponent of building super intelligence, calling it 'summoning a demon.' Once he realized that they were going to build it anyway without him, he said the only way he could have a say at the table was to be one of the top players." "If we have a second civilization on Mars. Does it help against super intelligence? No, of course not."
2:07

AI expert Dr. Roman Yampolskiy says Elon Musk knows super intelligence could eventually threaten humanity after once calling it “summoning a demon,” but chose to become a top AI player when he realized it was going to be built anyway. Dr. Roman: "If we build general super intelligence, at some point, it will decide to do something that is not compatible with our survival." PBD: "Do you think Elon knows this?" Dr. Roman: "He knows everything; he's very well informed. He was one of the early people to fund AI safety research." "He was the biggest opponent of building super intelligence, calling it 'summoning a demon.' Once he realized that they were going to build it anyway without him, he said the only way he could have a say at the table was to be one of the top players." "If we have a second civilization on Mars. Does it help against super intelligence? No, of course not."

PBD Podcast

17,717 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

Stanford neuroscientists Dr. David Eagleman says AI will have a problem with selection AI is massively creative. The part of creativity that AI can’t do right now is selection… meaning, it can generate 100 pictures, but it doesn’t know which one to pick.” “It doesn’t know which one is going to be the most appealing to you, but it can remix beautifully.” “When it generates the pixels, it’s doing this magical stuff under the hood where it’s deciding which pixels and how they diffuse together to make the image. But it doesn’t know how to read that image… it’s not seeing the image except as a bunch of pixels.”
1:48

Stanford neuroscientists Dr. David Eagleman says AI will have a problem with selection AI is massively creative. The part of creativity that AI can’t do right now is selection… meaning, it can generate 100 pictures, but it doesn’t know which one to pick.” “It doesn’t know which one is going to be the most appealing to you, but it can remix beautifully.” “When it generates the pixels, it’s doing this magical stuff under the hood where it’s deciding which pixels and how they diffuse together to make the image. But it doesn’t know how to read that image… it’s not seeing the image except as a bunch of pixels.”

STYRΞNΞ ✂️

10,287 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

AI will wipe out 99% of humanity but NOT in a Terminator way Dr. Roman Yampolskiy (Dr. Roman Yampolskiy), a founding researcher in AI safety, explains why superintelligence doesn't need a body to end us "You ask a squirrel how a human would kill you, and he says he has to chase me down, climb a tree and bite me really hard. Is that a useful explanation for another squirrel scientist? No" "You cannot predict what the smartest system will do. It comes up with new technology, discovers new laws of physics. You will not know what gets you or how"
1:13

AI will wipe out 99% of humanity but NOT in a Terminator way Dr. Roman Yampolskiy (Dr. Roman Yampolskiy), a founding researcher in AI safety, explains why superintelligence doesn't need a body to end us "You ask a squirrel how a human would kill you, and he says he has to chase me down, climb a tree and bite me really hard. Is that a useful explanation for another squirrel scientist? No" "You cannot predict what the smartest system will do. It comes up with new technology, discovers new laws of physics. You will not know what gets you or how"

EllioTrades Clips

175,502 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

A must-watch clip. Konstantin Kisin asks, “How will AI destroy humanity?” AI safety expert Roman Yampolskiy explains why that’s the wrong question. We assume AI will think like us. It won’t. A superintelligence could act far outside human understanding, like humans compared to squirrels. It wouldn’t need to hate us. It could wipe us out simply by pursuing something else. And the uncomfortable truth? We’re not in full control. Dr. Roman Yampolskiy explains that we don’t code these systems, we train them, then study what they become.
2:36

A must-watch clip. Konstantin Kisin asks, “How will AI destroy humanity?” AI safety expert Roman Yampolskiy explains why that’s the wrong question. We assume AI will think like us. It won’t. A superintelligence could act far outside human understanding, like humans compared to squirrels. It wouldn’t need to hate us. It could wipe us out simply by pursuing something else. And the uncomfortable truth? We’re not in full control. Dr. Roman Yampolskiy explains that we don’t code these systems, we train them, then study what they become.

TRIGGERnometry

135,149 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇺🇸 AI IS GETTING HARDER TO SPOT Rizwan Virk says we’re already at the point where AI can pass the classic Turing Test in text, so most people can’t tell if they’re talking to a human or a machine anymore. And the next step is virtual worlds, where AI characters (NPCs) could become so smart you won’t know if they’re controlled by a person or not. We’re not at rogue robots yet, but smarter AI inside games and simulations is coming first, and fast. Once AI blends in seamlessly, the line between tool, character, and independent actor starts getting very blurry. Full Interview with Rizwan Virk below.
6:07

🇺🇸 AI IS GETTING HARDER TO SPOT Rizwan Virk says we’re already at the point where AI can pass the classic Turing Test in text, so most people can’t tell if they’re talking to a human or a machine anymore. And the next step is virtual worlds, where AI characters (NPCs) could become so smart you won’t know if they’re controlled by a person or not. We’re not at rogue robots yet, but smarter AI inside games and simulations is coming first, and fast. Once AI blends in seamlessly, the line between tool, character, and independent actor starts getting very blurry. Full Interview with Rizwan Virk below.

Mario Nawfal

17,457 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🇹🇭 Thailand is obsessed with AI music slop You will hear it in almost every taxi, retail store and coffee shop It’s hard to notice at first but once you hear it you won’t unhear it And it’s funny cos everyone in tech twitter bashes AI music But 99% of the world doesn’t care (or know) if it’s AI They just care if it sounds nice It’s the same thing in Vietnam, they’ve just replaced playing cringy song covers with playing AI music Because it’s copyright free and you can find 10h playlists on YouTube so no need to create your own playlist anymore 😁 Pretty cool
0:26

🇹🇭 Thailand is obsessed with AI music slop You will hear it in almost every taxi, retail store and coffee shop It’s hard to notice at first but once you hear it you won’t unhear it And it’s funny cos everyone in tech twitter bashes AI music But 99% of the world doesn’t care (or know) if it’s AI They just care if it sounds nice It’s the same thing in Vietnam, they’ve just replaced playing cringy song covers with playing AI music Because it’s copyright free and you can find 10h playlists on YouTube so no need to create your own playlist anymore 😁 Pretty cool

Rob Hallam

158,446 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

ELON: TESLA’S FSD IS SO GOOD YOU’LL BE ABLE TO TEXT AND DRIVE At the Tesla Shareholder meeting, Elon said the biggest challenge isn’t making Tesla’s Full Self-Driving work, it’s getting people to realize how far it’s come: “I think the single biggest thing we need to do is educate potential customers. You can either have a normal car or you can have Frozen Boots, and Frozen Boots is very cool. Some people have even paid for FSD and never turned it on. We show them how easy it is, and once they try it for a few days, they can’t live without it. With version 14, we’re almost comfortable allowing people to text and drive. That’s really what people want to do.” Source: Captain Eli Elon Musk
1:24

ELON: TESLA’S FSD IS SO GOOD YOU’LL BE ABLE TO TEXT AND DRIVE At the Tesla Shareholder meeting, Elon said the biggest challenge isn’t making Tesla’s Full Self-Driving work, it’s getting people to realize how far it’s come: “I think the single biggest thing we need to do is educate potential customers. You can either have a normal car or you can have Frozen Boots, and Frozen Boots is very cool. Some people have even paid for FSD and never turned it on. We show them how easy it is, and once they try it for a few days, they can’t live without it. With version 14, we’re almost comfortable allowing people to text and drive. That’s really what people want to do.” Source: Captain Eli Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

43,635 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

mind you this was what carlos said about standing up for what he believes about the new regulations, he said he would be the first one to stand up and refute them if he didn't agree with it, but the media turn his statement into something that it wasn't Carlos: “I have to give it the opportunity first and then judge, as I have said before, and I insist, if I see that I don’t like it or it doesn’t motivate me or I see that this Formula 1 has too many negative parts, I will be the first to go with Max to talk to Stefano Domenicali or to talk to Mohammed Ben Sulayem to tell him : 'hey this doesn’t work, you were wrong, we didn’t enjoy the car, we have to change something because this is not going anywhere” I will be the first to do it and I will go with Max hand in hand or with George or whoever' “But I insist, I think that my personal level is still not the time and it’s still time to judge without even having run a race” and the fact that it is not the first time, is what is more infuriating
0:47

mind you this was what carlos said about standing up for what he believes about the new regulations, he said he would be the first one to stand up and refute them if he didn't agree with it, but the media turn his statement into something that it wasn't Carlos: “I have to give it the opportunity first and then judge, as I have said before, and I insist, if I see that I don’t like it or it doesn’t motivate me or I see that this Formula 1 has too many negative parts, I will be the first to go with Max to talk to Stefano Domenicali or to talk to Mohammed Ben Sulayem to tell him : 'hey this doesn’t work, you were wrong, we didn’t enjoy the car, we have to change something because this is not going anywhere” I will be the first to do it and I will go with Max hand in hand or with George or whoever' “But I insist, I think that my personal level is still not the time and it’s still time to judge without even having run a race” and the fact that it is not the first time, is what is more infuriating

ari 🦄✨

27,061 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Everyone focused on AI that can generate videos. I think the real breakthrough is AI that generates worlds. Not clips. Not cutscenes. Not pre-rendered environments. Worlds you can actually move through, interact with, and keep exploring in real time. The jump from “video generation” to “world simulation” is going to be much bigger than most people realize. Robbyant is one of the first projects I’ve seen pushing in that direction. 💻 Github: 🎮 Try it online: 🤗 Weights: 🌐 Website:
0:56

Everyone focused on AI that can generate videos. I think the real breakthrough is AI that generates worlds. Not clips. Not cutscenes. Not pre-rendered environments. Worlds you can actually move through, interact with, and keep exploring in real time. The jump from “video generation” to “world simulation” is going to be much bigger than most people realize. Robbyant is one of the first projects I’ve seen pushing in that direction. 💻 Github: 🎮 Try it online: 🤗 Weights: 🌐 Website:

haytam

42,978 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Robot simulation is getting a big upgrade! 🔥 Normally, building a simulation environment, a kitchen, warehouse, office takes days or weeks. You have to model the geometry, add textures, set lighting, generate collision meshes… all before a robot can even interact with it. Marble by World Labs removes most of that work. You type a text prompt or give it an image, and it generates a full 3D scene with depth, lighting, and a collider mesh you can export into engines like MuJoCo. That means researchers can quickly create lots of different environments to train robots on, which is exactly what domain randomization needs. If we want robots to learn faster, we need to create worlds faster. ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →
0:59

Robot simulation is getting a big upgrade! 🔥 Normally, building a simulation environment, a kitchen, warehouse, office takes days or weeks. You have to model the geometry, add textures, set lighting, generate collision meshes… all before a robot can even interact with it. Marble by World Labs removes most of that work. You type a text prompt or give it an image, and it generates a full 3D scene with depth, lighting, and a collider mesh you can export into engines like MuJoCo. That means researchers can quickly create lots of different environments to train robots on, which is exactly what domain randomization needs. If we want robots to learn faster, we need to create worlds faster. ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

Lukas Ziegler

15,498 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Demis Hassabis confirmed every frontier AI lab is working on recursive self-improvement and in the same sentence said the safety risk of removing humans from the loop entirely keeps him up at night. That combination should stop you. The CEO of Google DeepMind just confirmed that the thing most people treat as a theoretical future risk is already the active focus of every serious lab on earth right now. He explained why it works in coding and math. The feedback loop is fast. You can verify whether an answer is correct almost instantly. You can generate synthetic training data from it. The loop closes quickly and cleanly. Then he said where it breaks down. In biology, chemistry and physics. Any domain where verifying a hypothesis requires a physical experiment in the real world. The loop does not close in seconds. It closes in weeks or months. Geoffrey Hinton said in his Nobel lecture that recursive self-improvement is the development he fears most and that once started it may not be possible to stop. Hassabis is not pushing back on that. He is describing the guardrails labs are building around a process they are already running. Every lab has to think carefully about the safety of a process where no human is in the loop. He said that as a constraint they are navigating right now. The question they are sitting with is how much of it to let run without a human watching. (Watch the full interview on YouTube at Two Minute Papers channel)
2:00

Demis Hassabis confirmed every frontier AI lab is working on recursive self-improvement and in the same sentence said the safety risk of removing humans from the loop entirely keeps him up at night. That combination should stop you. The CEO of Google DeepMind just confirmed that the thing most people treat as a theoretical future risk is already the active focus of every serious lab on earth right now. He explained why it works in coding and math. The feedback loop is fast. You can verify whether an answer is correct almost instantly. You can generate synthetic training data from it. The loop closes quickly and cleanly. Then he said where it breaks down. In biology, chemistry and physics. Any domain where verifying a hypothesis requires a physical experiment in the real world. The loop does not close in seconds. It closes in weeks or months. Geoffrey Hinton said in his Nobel lecture that recursive self-improvement is the development he fears most and that once started it may not be possible to stop. Hassabis is not pushing back on that. He is describing the guardrails labs are building around a process they are already running. Every lab has to think carefully about the safety of a process where no human is in the loop. He said that as a constraint they are navigating right now. The question they are sitting with is how much of it to let run without a human watching. (Watch the full interview on YouTube at Two Minute Papers channel)

Ihtesham Ali

68,231 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨AI IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN NUKES AND NO ONE IS IN CONTROL Most people compare AI to nuclear weapons. Roman Yampolskiy says that comparison misses the real danger. Nukes still require human decisions. Someone has to launch them. Someone can stop them. Advanced AI does not work that way. Once powerful systems are deployed, they make decisions on their own. And the people who build them do not truly control what happens next. He says we did the opposite of what safety demanded. Instead of slowing down, we connected AI to the internet, open sourced it, and pushed it forward in an arms race with no serious oversight. Governments talk about regulation, but most of it never materialized. In some cases, rules were blocked before they even started. Yampolskiy’s warning is simple. With nukes, the world tried to limit the damage. With AI, we are accelerating toward something we may not be able to stop. Full conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below
2:41

🚨AI IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN NUKES AND NO ONE IS IN CONTROL Most people compare AI to nuclear weapons. Roman Yampolskiy says that comparison misses the real danger. Nukes still require human decisions. Someone has to launch them. Someone can stop them. Advanced AI does not work that way. Once powerful systems are deployed, they make decisions on their own. And the people who build them do not truly control what happens next. He says we did the opposite of what safety demanded. Instead of slowing down, we connected AI to the internet, open sourced it, and pushed it forward in an arms race with no serious oversight. Governments talk about regulation, but most of it never materialized. In some cases, rules were blocked before they even started. Yampolskiy’s warning is simple. With nukes, the world tried to limit the damage. With AI, we are accelerating toward something we may not be able to stop. Full conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

Mario Nawfal

24,888 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

anthropic just removed the biggest excuse people had for not building ai agents. “it’s too hard.” not anymore. a few months ago, building an ai agent meant learning how to code, setting up apis, configuring servers, and fixing endless errors. today, all you need is one github repo. anthropic open-sourced launch your agent. it asks what you want to build. then it does the rest. it builds your agent, deploys it to the cloud, tests it, improves it, and keeps it running even after you close your laptop. no fake demos. no complicated setup. just a real ai agent running in your own account. the best part. it doesn’t run on your computer. it runs inside claude managed agents, works 24/7, and costs just a few cents per run. people are already building research agents, lead generation systems, content pipelines, and customer support agents that save hours of work every day. the gap between people who use ai and people who build ai workers is getting bigger every week. that’s usually where the biggest opportunities are. build your first ai agent before everyone else does. watch the video and read the full guide below 👇
16:19

anthropic just removed the biggest excuse people had for not building ai agents. “it’s too hard.” not anymore. a few months ago, building an ai agent meant learning how to code, setting up apis, configuring servers, and fixing endless errors. today, all you need is one github repo. anthropic open-sourced launch your agent. it asks what you want to build. then it does the rest. it builds your agent, deploys it to the cloud, tests it, improves it, and keeps it running even after you close your laptop. no fake demos. no complicated setup. just a real ai agent running in your own account. the best part. it doesn’t run on your computer. it runs inside claude managed agents, works 24/7, and costs just a few cents per run. people are already building research agents, lead generation systems, content pipelines, and customer support agents that save hours of work every day. the gap between people who use ai and people who build ai workers is getting bigger every week. that’s usually where the biggest opportunities are. build your first ai agent before everyone else does. watch the video and read the full guide below 👇

MIKE

26,662 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten