Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

AI only has pre-schooler level capabilities for visual tasks. "The frontier models—the best of them—still reason around the age of a preschooler, and any elementary school kid in that benchmark was able to beat all the frontier models on these visual tasks." "These are tasks that are not just...

26,250 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

6 Yorum

Vanar profil fotoğrafı
Vanar4 ay önce

The gap isn’t seeing the world. It’s consistently reasoning and acting within it under uncertainty.

Yao888pi Shen profil fotoğrafı
Yao888pi Shen3 ay önce

You can't even define text logic, yet you expect images to teach AI physics? AI is just text vectors + probability. Without clear evaluation functions, escaping to an undefined domain isn't 'progress'—it's pure waste. VOID"

Rupert Davies profil fotoğrafı
Rupert Davies4 ay önce

A child builds mental models of space. An LLM predicts tokens. These are not the same thing.

Vlady profil fotoğrafı
Vlady4 ay önce

funny that an actual elementary schooler beats every frontier model on those visual tasks, benchmarks don't lie.

anjali kushwaha profil fotoğrafı
anjali kushwaha4 ay önce

T

เอ็ม 🤖 | AI & Cats profil fotoğrafı
เอ็ม 🤖 | AI & Cats4 ay önce

AI progress isn't just about scaling models. Understanding where they still struggle is just as important.

Benzer Videolar

We benchmarked leading multimodal foundation models (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini, Llama, etc.) on standard computer vision tasks—from segmentation to surface normal estimation—using standard datasets like COCO and ImageNet. These models have made remarkable progress; however, it is unclear exactly where they stand in terms of understanding vision in detail. Especially when it comes to tasks beyond question-answering. How well do they understand an object's segments or geometry? Our analyses yield an assessment that is quantitatively and qualitatively detailed and is compatible with evaluations developed in the field of computer vision over the past decades. Observed trends: 🔹 The foundation models consistently underperform task-specific SOTA models across all tasks. However, they are respectable generalists, which is remarkable as they are presumably trained primarily on image-text-based tasks. 🔹 They perform semantic tasks notably better than geometric ones. 🔹 GPT-4o performs the best among non-reasoning models, getting the top position in 4 out of 6 tasks. 🔹 Reasoning models, e.g., o3, show improvements in geometric tasks. 🔹 The 'image generation' models, e.g., GPT-40 Image Generation, which have been natively trained multimodally, exhibit quirks. E.g., hallucinated objects, misalignment between the input and output, etc. 🔹 While the prompting techniques affect performance, better models exhibit less sensitivity to variations in prompts. We control for the variance introduced by the prompting methods in our experiments. 🌐 Detailed analyses, visualizations: ⌨️ code: 🧵 1/n

Amir Zamir

73,502 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce