Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

AI STARTUPS ARE WRITING CODE FASTER THAN HUMANS AND RAISING BILLIONS WHILE THEY’RE AT IT AI now writes code for apps, games, and websites faster and cheaper than people. Cursor raised $900 million at a $10 billion valuation. Windsurf may sell to OpenAI for $3 billion. Their tools turn... plain English into working code. Google says over 30 percent of its code is AI-written. Amazon saved 4,500 developer-years. Microsoft said 30 percent of its code is AI-made and laid off 6,000 workers. Despite high revenue, these startups are losing money. Cursor makes $100 million but spends more. Windsurf earns $50 million and is also in the red due to steep AI model costs. To cut expenses, Poolside raised $600 million to build its own AI. Magic Dev raised $500 million but has yet to launch a product. Everyone is racing to dominate before Big Tech does. Entry-level coding jobs are disappearing. The machines are not coming. They are already here. Source: Reutersshow more

Mario Nawfal

2,282,493 subscribers

118,552 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Finanzen Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 Kommentare

Profilbild von Olivia

Oliviavor 1 Jahr

The rise of AI in coding is undeniable—Cursor's $900M at a $10B valuation and Windsurf's potential $3B sale to OpenAI highlight this shift. AI's efficiency is transforming industries, aligning with DOGE principles to streamline processes and boost innovation.

Profilbild von Anthony Young

Anthony Youngvor 1 Jahr

（@Stock_godfather）He is great. The posts are great. $NVDA $TSLA 😃😁😖😁

Profilbild von Spicy Rich

Spicy Richvor 1 Jahr

Let's get it!

Profilbild von MsInterpreted

MsInterpretedvor 1 Jahr

This is the Meta rn. We need to keep ahead of the current curve in AI to stay relevant

Profilbild von Ryleigh

Ryleighvor 1 Jahr

He is great and his posts are great. @Analyst_Javier 🚩 🎊 🎈

Profilbild von Angel 🎻

Angel 🎻vor 1 Jahr

That’s crazy because I have been watching less and less of any of that. I’m less likely to engage if I don’t have a hand in how something is created. It just becomes another thing that has nothing to do with me. A spatula.

Profilbild von Yorkshire Lass

Yorkshire Lassvor 1 Jahr

Aye, and while they’re busy raising billions, the rest of us are still trying to get a decent Wi-Fi signal!

Profilbild von 0xAlex

0xAlexvor 1 Jahr

Watching big tech companies race to get there means alot is going to evolve faster

Ähnliche Videos

$OpenAI Greg Brockman says the fraction of code not written by AI is vanishing With the right context and structure, the actual coding is already better handled by AI than by humans "what's left for human experts is the architecture" But the actual writing of code is essentially all AI now$

OpenAI Greg Brockman says the fraction of code not written by AI is vanishing With the right context and structure, the actual coding is already better handled by AI than by humans "what's left for human experts is the architecture" But the actual writing of code is essentially all AI now

Haider.

11,059 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Snapchat is laying off over 1,000 employees and replacing their jobs with artificial intelligence “Snap's CEO says the company is looking to slash costs by half a billion dollars. The company says more than half of its code is currently produced by artificial intelligence” This represents about 16% of its full-time workforce AI customer service agents are already responding to over 1 million internal queries per month This cut to their workforce came after pressure from investor Irenic Capital Management

Snapchat is laying off over 1,000 employees and replacing their jobs with artificial intelligence “Snap's CEO says the company is looking to slash costs by half a billion dollars. The company says more than half of its code is currently produced by artificial intelligence” This represents about 16% of its full-time workforce AI customer service agents are already responding to over 1 million internal queries per month This cut to their workforce came after pressure from investor Irenic Capital Management

Wall Street Apes

49,455 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

30% OF GOOGLE'S CODE IS NOW WRITTEN BY AI CEO Sundar Pichai said AI is already writing over 30% of all code checked in at Google—up from 25% just months ago. That’s not autocomplete—that’s AI contributing actual solutions at scale. It’s “still early days,” but the bots are already pulling their weight in Big Tech’s codebase. Next year? That percentage might come for your job. Source: TheAIGRID

30% OF GOOGLE'S CODE IS NOW WRITTEN BY AI CEO Sundar Pichai said AI is already writing over 30% of all code checked in at Google—up from 25% just months ago. That’s not autocomplete—that’s AI contributing actual solutions at scale. It’s “still early days,” but the bots are already pulling their weight in Big Tech’s codebase. Next year? That percentage might come for your job. Source: TheAIGRID

Mario Nawfal

126,067 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Windsurf is the iPhone of AI code editors. It's cheaper than Cursor too, but is it better overall? By popular request, here's my in-depth review:

Windsurf is the iPhone of AI code editors. It's cheaper than Cursor too, but is it better overall? By popular request, here's my in-depth review:

Steve (Builder.io)

111,222 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

AI Agents can now connect to 100,000+ APIs instantly. Postman's AI Agent builder can turn any API into an MCP server in seconds without writing a single line of Code. You can use it in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf and other AI tools.

AI Agents can now connect to 100,000+ APIs instantly. Postman's AI Agent builder can turn any API into an MCP server in seconds without writing a single line of Code. You can use it in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf and other AI tools.

Shubham Saboo

79,784 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Is Claude Code Better Than Cursor? This video is a crystal clear explanation on what makes Claude Code different than Cursor, Codex and Windsurf. A classic whiteboard conversation! Next time he's on the pod (soon) he's going to build an app from scratch that will blow your mind. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro to Claude Code 00:28 Why Claude Code Is Best 02:38 Comparing Cursor, Windsurf & Claude Code 07:41 Using Claude Code with Other IDEs 12:41 Future of AI Coding Tools & Claude’s SDK 19:58 Integrating Codex with Chat GPT 21:14 Best AI Code Review Tools (Devon, CodeRabbit 26:49 Building an App with Claude Code (Step-by-Step) 35:32 Future Plans

Is Claude Code Better Than Cursor? This video is a crystal clear explanation on what makes Claude Code different than Cursor, Codex and Windsurf. A classic whiteboard conversation! Next time he's on the pod (soon) he's going to build an app from scratch that will blow your mind. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro to Claude Code 00:28 Why Claude Code Is Best 02:38 Comparing Cursor, Windsurf & Claude Code 07:41 Using Claude Code with Other IDEs 12:41 Future of AI Coding Tools & Claude’s SDK 19:58 Integrating Codex with Chat GPT 21:14 Best AI Code Review Tools (Devon, CodeRabbit 26:49 Building an App with Claude Code (Step-by-Step) 35:32 Future Plans

Riley Brown

115,551 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇺🇸 AMAZON HITS 1 MILLION ROBOTS AND THEY’RE MOVING FAST Amazon just rolled out its millionth warehouse robot and a new AI called DeepFleet to control them all. It makes deliveries faster by cutting robot travel time by 10 percent. These bots can now lift over 1,200 pounds like it's nothing. AI jobs are growing, but even Amazon admits some human jobs will get replaced. Source: Rowan Cheung

🇺🇸 AMAZON HITS 1 MILLION ROBOTS AND THEY’RE MOVING FAST Amazon just rolled out its millionth warehouse robot and a new AI called DeepFleet to control them all. It makes deliveries faster by cutting robot travel time by 10 percent. These bots can now lift over 1,200 pounds like it's nothing. AI jobs are growing, but even Amazon admits some human jobs will get replaced. Source: Rowan Cheung

Mario Nawfal

141,944 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Microsoft just banned its own engineers from using AI. The tool was literally costing MORE than the humans it was supposed to replace. They lied to you about AI adoption and now the whole narrative is blowing up: Microsoft gave thousands of engineers access to Claude Code six months ago and encouraged them to use it. Engineers loved it and adoption exploded. But then the invoices arrived. Token-based pricing means every query, every code review, every debugging session costs money. At scale across 100,000 engineers, the numbers became so large that Microsoft issued an internal order to cancel nearly all Claude Code licenses by end of June and force everyone onto their own cheaper tool instead. The company that invested $5 billion in Anthropic just told its own people to stop using Anthropic's product because it costs too much. Uber's story is even worse... Their CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga told The Information that the budget he planned for the full year was "blown away already" by April. Uber had rolled out Claude Code in December 2025. By March, 84% of their 5,000 engineers were using it with 70% of all committed code coming from AI systems. Heavy users were burning $500 to $2,000 per month each. Naga himself spent $1,200 in a single two-hour demo session. The company had even built internal leaderboards ranking engineers by how much AI they used. They literally gamified the spending and then ran out of money. Now look at what Nvidia's own VP of applied deep learning Bryan Catanzaro said to Axios last month. Direct quote: "For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees." This is a VP at the company that SELLS the chips saying that using AI is more expensive than paying humans. Think about what this means for the entire AI narrative. Every CEO on every earnings call for the past two years has said the same thing: AI will make us more efficient, reduce headcount, and cut costs. The stock market rewarded every company that said it. Fired workers, stock goes up. Announced AI adoption, stock goes up. But the actual companies deploying AI at scale are discovering the math doesn't work. The MORE employees use AI, the HIGHER the bill. Goldman Sachs forecasts a 24x increase in token consumption by 2030 as companies adopt AI agents. Gartner just published a report showing that even though individual token prices will drop 90% by 2030, total enterprise AI costs will go UP because agents consume exponentially more tokens per task than basic tools. Meta built an internal dashboard called "Claudeonomics" to track which employees use the most AI. Amazon started pushing engineers to "tokenmaxx," their internal term for consuming as many AI tokens as possible. Both companies are spending hundreds of billions on AI infrastructure this year alone. And Microsoft, the company that bet its entire future on AI, just told 100,000 engineers to stop using the tool they liked best because the per-token bills got out of control. The companies building AI are telling investors it saves money. The companies using AI are finding out it costs more than the humans it was supposed to replace. And even the company that makes the chips just admitted it through its own VP. This is the gap nobody on Wall Street is pricing in. $725 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year across Big Tech. And the first companies to actually deploy these tools at scale are already pulling back because the economics don't work. What do you think?

Microsoft just banned its own engineers from using AI. The tool was literally costing MORE than the humans it was supposed to replace. They lied to you about AI adoption and now the whole narrative is blowing up: Microsoft gave thousands of engineers access to Claude Code six months ago and encouraged them to use it. Engineers loved it and adoption exploded. But then the invoices arrived. Token-based pricing means every query, every code review, every debugging session costs money. At scale across 100,000 engineers, the numbers became so large that Microsoft issued an internal order to cancel nearly all Claude Code licenses by end of June and force everyone onto their own cheaper tool instead. The company that invested $5 billion in Anthropic just told its own people to stop using Anthropic's product because it costs too much. Uber's story is even worse... Their CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga told The Information that the budget he planned for the full year was "blown away already" by April. Uber had rolled out Claude Code in December 2025. By March, 84% of their 5,000 engineers were using it with 70% of all committed code coming from AI systems. Heavy users were burning $500 to $2,000 per month each. Naga himself spent $1,200 in a single two-hour demo session. The company had even built internal leaderboards ranking engineers by how much AI they used. They literally gamified the spending and then ran out of money. Now look at what Nvidia's own VP of applied deep learning Bryan Catanzaro said to Axios last month. Direct quote: "For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees." This is a VP at the company that SELLS the chips saying that using AI is more expensive than paying humans. Think about what this means for the entire AI narrative. Every CEO on every earnings call for the past two years has said the same thing: AI will make us more efficient, reduce headcount, and cut costs. The stock market rewarded every company that said it. Fired workers, stock goes up. Announced AI adoption, stock goes up. But the actual companies deploying AI at scale are discovering the math doesn't work. The MORE employees use AI, the HIGHER the bill. Goldman Sachs forecasts a 24x increase in token consumption by 2030 as companies adopt AI agents. Gartner just published a report showing that even though individual token prices will drop 90% by 2030, total enterprise AI costs will go UP because agents consume exponentially more tokens per task than basic tools. Meta built an internal dashboard called "Claudeonomics" to track which employees use the most AI. Amazon started pushing engineers to "tokenmaxx," their internal term for consuming as many AI tokens as possible. Both companies are spending hundreds of billions on AI infrastructure this year alone. And Microsoft, the company that bet its entire future on AI, just told 100,000 engineers to stop using the tool they liked best because the per-token bills got out of control. The companies building AI are telling investors it saves money. The companies using AI are finding out it costs more than the humans it was supposed to replace. And even the company that makes the chips just admitted it through its own VP. This is the gap nobody on Wall Street is pricing in. $725 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year across Big Tech. And the first companies to actually deploy these tools at scale are already pulling back because the economics don't work. What do you think?

Ricardo

2,947,860 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"SpaceX is the only vertically integrated AI company, from soup to nuts. They have absolutely everything. Cursor is one of the most important pieces of AI right now, which is agentic AI for coding, so they can code better and faster than anyone out there, and their growth has gone viral. They've gone from a billion in revenues at the beginning of this year, they expected to exit at 6 billion. So, it's very important to growth. The Starship is the first totally reusable rocket, and it can take weights that are like 10 times heavier than anything they've taken before. So that's going to enable the new communication satellites, and it'll also enable data centers in space over time."

"SpaceX is the only vertically integrated AI company, from soup to nuts. They have absolutely everything. Cursor is one of the most important pieces of AI right now, which is agentic AI for coding, so they can code better and faster than anyone out there, and their growth has gone viral. They've gone from a billion in revenues at the beginning of this year, they expected to exit at 6 billion. So, it's very important to growth. The Starship is the first totally reusable rocket, and it can take weights that are like 10 times heavier than anything they've taken before. So that's going to enable the new communication satellites, and it'll also enable data centers in space over time."

DogeDesigner

93,755 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

Elon Musk just made one if the biggest moves in taking over the programming industry “SpaceX just bought Cursor for $60 billion. Do you realize how big this is? SpaceX went public — the biggest IPO in history. $75 billion raised, almost a $2 trillion valuation and the first thing to do with that money? Buy the most popular AI coding tool on the planet. Here's why that changes everything. Elon now owns 3 layers: the compute, Colossus data centers, the models, Grok through xAI, and now the tool that developers actually use every day. It's the full stack. And here's what makes Cursor different from Claude Code or Codex. Cursor is model agnostic. You can run Claude in it, GPT, Gemini, whatever model you want. It's not locked to any one company, and now it has SpaceX's resources behind it. Cursor said they were bottlenecked by compute. Well, that bottleneck has just been removed. $4 billion in annual revenue, over half the Fortune 500 already uses it, and now it's backed by a $2 trillion company. OpenAI has Codex, Anthropic has Claude Code, and now Elon has Cursor.” Let me break this down in simple terms Elon Musk now controls more of the full AI picture: - Massive computers, power (data centers like Colossus) - Smart AI models (Grok from xAI) - The actual tool millions of developers use every day (Cursor) For every day users this means Faster and smarter apps and websites in the future. More developers using powerful AI tools means new apps, games, websites, and features get built quicker and cheaper. This means better video games, smoother streaming, smarter phone apps and better programs For Developers they can describe what they want in plain English (“make a feature that does X”) and the AI handles more of the heavy lifting

Elon Musk just made one if the biggest moves in taking over the programming industry “SpaceX just bought Cursor for $60 billion. Do you realize how big this is? SpaceX went public — the biggest IPO in history. $75 billion raised, almost a $2 trillion valuation and the first thing to do with that money? Buy the most popular AI coding tool on the planet. Here's why that changes everything. Elon now owns 3 layers: the compute, Colossus data centers, the models, Grok through xAI, and now the tool that developers actually use every day. It's the full stack. And here's what makes Cursor different from Claude Code or Codex. Cursor is model agnostic. You can run Claude in it, GPT, Gemini, whatever model you want. It's not locked to any one company, and now it has SpaceX's resources behind it. Cursor said they were bottlenecked by compute. Well, that bottleneck has just been removed. $4 billion in annual revenue, over half the Fortune 500 already uses it, and now it's backed by a $2 trillion company. OpenAI has Codex, Anthropic has Claude Code, and now Elon has Cursor.” Let me break this down in simple terms Elon Musk now controls more of the full AI picture: - Massive computers, power (data centers like Colossus) - Smart AI models (Grok from xAI) - The actual tool millions of developers use every day (Cursor) For every day users this means Faster and smarter apps and websites in the future. More developers using powerful AI tools means new apps, games, websites, and features get built quicker and cheaper. This means better video games, smoother streaming, smarter phone apps and better programs For Developers they can describe what they want in plain English (“make a feature that does X”) and the AI handles more of the heavy lifting

Wall Street Apes

211,971 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Cursor, WindSurf, and Copilot suck with Jupyter notebooks. They are great when you are writing regular code, but notebooks are a different monster. Vincent is an extension fine-tuned to work with notebooks. 10x better than the other tools! Here is a quick video:

Cursor, WindSurf, and Copilot suck with Jupyter notebooks. They are great when you are writing regular code, but notebooks are a different monster. Vincent is an extension fine-tuned to work with notebooks. 10x better than the other tools! Here is a quick video:

Santiago

148,159 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

AI coding tools are everywhere. Yet they all fall short when scaling to 100s of developers and complex codebases. We’re solving this problem Augment Code. Introducing Augment Code, the first developer AI purpose-built for teams.🧵

AI coding tools are everywhere. Yet they all fall short when scaling to 100s of developers and complex codebases. We’re solving this problem Augment Code. Introducing Augment Code, the first developer AI purpose-built for teams.🧵

Scott Dietzen

91,325 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

OpenAI is building its AI into humanoid robots. The company just invested in Figure and signed a collaboration agreement to develop next-generation AI models for robots. Embodied AI is coming in 2024. But there's more: Figure also raised $675M at a whopping $2.6B valuation (while only being founded in 2022!) On top of OpenAI, new investors include Jeff Bezos, NVIDIA, Microsoft, Intel, OpenAI, and more.

OpenAI is building its AI into humanoid robots. The company just invested in Figure and signed a collaboration agreement to develop next-generation AI models for robots. Embodied AI is coming in 2024. But there's more: Figure also raised $675M at a whopping $2.6B valuation (while only being founded in 2022!) On top of OpenAI, new investors include Jeff Bezos, NVIDIA, Microsoft, Intel, OpenAI, and more.

Rowan Cheung

175,617 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Today, teams ship AI-generated code faster than they can verify it. AI will write most of the world's code, Momentic will make sure it works. We've raised a $15M Series A led by Standard Capital to build the definitive source of truth for software.

Today, teams ship AI-generated code faster than they can verify it. AI will write most of the world's code, Momentic will make sure it works. We've raised a $15M Series A led by Standard Capital to build the definitive source of truth for software.

wei-wei

2,644,128 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Google Chief Scientist, Jeff Dean "AI now generates 25% of Google's integrated code" Google has already trained a Gemini model on its internal codebase to help developers this doesn’t cover everything, but it improves AI-assisted coding by integrating code into its parameters

Google Chief Scientist, Jeff Dean "AI now generates 25% of Google's integrated code" Google has already trained a Gemini model on its internal codebase to help developers this doesn’t cover everything, but it improves AI-assisted coding by integrating code into its parameters

Haider.

173,475 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Larry Ellison says today's AI models are no longer just inferencing; they reason like we do These systems handle deduction, calculation, and strategy far faster than people "at Oracle, most code is now AI-generated" We declare our intent; the model writes the procedure

Larry Ellison says today's AI models are no longer just inferencing; they reason like we do These systems handle deduction, calculation, and strategy far faster than people "at Oracle, most code is now AI-generated" We declare our intent; the model writes the procedure

Haider.

172,446 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

TikTok just forked VS Code?! ByteDance launched Trae - an AI code editor meant to compete with Cursor, Copilot and Windsurf. I gave it a shot and it's very close to Cursor - especially the Agent mode.

TikTok just forked VS Code?! ByteDance launched Trae - an AI code editor meant to compete with Cursor, Copilot and Windsurf. I gave it a shot and it's very close to Cursor - especially the Agent mode.

Wes Bos

106,168 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr