Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

AISH is being replaced with ADAP. A program that cuts benefits, tightens rules, and reduces appeal rights. Disabled Albertans are being pushed into deeper poverty. 📢 Full breakdown + action steps before Sept 12 here ⬇️ Please share widely 💚 #Alberta

35,651 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

One of the most moving moments in Red Deer was talking to a kindly older woman standing on a busy street, waving an Alberta flag alongside a crowd of hundreds, and explaining exactly why she was there. She said she was doing it for her kids and her grandkids. She wants them to live free, be able to buy a house, get educated, and have a good life. That is what made the moment so powerful. This was not politics as a hobby. This was a grandmother looking at the direction of the country and deciding that if she wants a better future for the next generation, she has to step out into public and stand for it. That is deeply symbolic. Because when you see an older woman on the side of a major road waving a flag for Alberta independence, you are not looking at extremism. You are looking at concern, love, memory, and hope. You are looking at someone who has lived long enough to compare the Canada she remembers with the Canada we have now, and who no longer believes the current path will deliver a decent life for her family. She says very plainly that Canada has betrayed Alberta, that Ottawa wants Alberta’s money and resources but will not help Alberta prosper, and that this is why she now believes Alberta has to take care of itself. That matters because it shows what is driving this movement at a human level. A lot of people outside Alberta still try to frame support for independence as anger or protest alone. But conversations like this show something deeper. Many people are being motivated by love of family and a desire to leave their children and grandchildren something better than debt, housing insecurity, declining affordability, and a political system that seems to take Alberta for granted. She says her kids may never buy a home the way things are now, and that some cannot even afford food. That is not abstract ideology. That is a moral alarm bell. She also makes the case many Albertans now make instinctively: if Alberta kept more of its own money, managed its own affairs, and stopped endlessly subsidizing a system that does not serve it, families here would have a real chance to get ahead again. More opportunity. Less tax burden. More control. More ability to build a future in our own province. Whether people agree with every detail or not, the emotional truth behind it is clear: she sees independence not as destruction, but as rescue. And maybe that is the most significant thing about the whole exchange. For her, Alberta independence is not mainly about grievance. It is about hope. Hope that her grandkids might still buy a home. Hope that they might live free. Hope that Alberta might finally start working for Albertans again. When a grandmother is standing on the roadside saying that out loud, people should pay attention.

Jon Alberta Patriot

15,154 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Another strong conversation in Red Deer was with a supporter who put his finger on something important: for a lot of Albertans, this is no longer mainly about oil or even economics. It is about freedom, rights, and whether Alberta still has a future inside a country that no longer feels like the one people grew up loving. He says it directly: this is not the Canada he fell in love with, and more and more people feel the same way. What makes this exchange significant is that it shows how the movement is maturing. It starts with the visible size of the line, the honking, and the energy on the street, but very quickly the conversation goes deeper. He argues that if people really understood what Ottawa is doing, they would be all over this. That is a revealing point because it frames Alberta independence not as some fringe impulse, but as a conclusion people arrive at once they stop assuming Canada still operates on the values it claims to stand for. We then get into one of the deepest issues of all: rights. He makes the argument that Canadians are taught to think they have rights, but in practice many of those rights function more like privileges that can be overridden. I respond by pointing to the first clause of the Charter and the broader constitutional problem that Canadians often speak as if they have American-style guarantees when they do not. That matters because once people conclude their freedoms are conditional, they stop thinking only in economic terms and start thinking civilizationally. What kind of country do we actually live in, and what kind of country do we want to build? He also makes a crucial point when he says this has gone way beyond oil and pipelines. He brings up unfair representation, the treatment of Alberta, and the feeling that the system has never really been fair to this province, only now it is being said openly and to our faces. That is one of the reasons the independence argument is broadening. It is no longer just resource frustration. It is about political dignity, democratic legitimacy, and whether Alberta is treated as a partner or as a region to be used. And the ending says a lot too. He brings it back to the kids, to affordability, to family formation, and to the people who are hurting the most. That is the deeper moral force behind this movement. For many supporters, Alberta independence is not mainly about anger. It is about creating a future where the next generation can still afford a home, raise a family, and live with real freedom and real opportunity.

Jon Alberta Patriot

12,159 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I was at a massive Pro Independence rally in Rocky Mountain House and there was a small counter protest (7 people). One of the Forever Canada guys said Alberta independence supporters should not be using the poppy. Even if a veteran supports Alberta independence, thats wrong in his eyes! If you're a veteran tell me what you think. I’m not in the military, so I’m not going to pretend I speak for them, but I have a strong suspicion many veterans would reject the idea that support for Alberta independence cancels out their right to wear a poppy. He also appealed to his grandfather fighting in the war for Canada. I treated that seriously, because I do respect that. But then I asked the obvious question: what did his grandfather actually fight for? That should have been the easiest answer in the world. He could have said freedom of speech, freedom of religion, basic liberty, self-government, or the rights that make a country worth defending. But the only real answer he could give was the freedom to survive here". That answer stuck with me, because it reveals something deeper than I think he meant to reveal. Too many pro-Canada arguments today sound like that. Not a vision of freedom. Not a belief in sovereignty. Not even a confident defence of rights. Just survival. That is the irony. The people accusing Alberta independence supporters of being dangerous often sound like they have given up on the very idea of living freely and building something better. They do not speak like people with a dream. They speak like people hanging on. Then, after all that, he pushed the claim that the UCP are “banning books.” That is incredibly disingenuous. The issue is sexually explicit material in school libraries. The facts are easy to find, and reducing that debate to “book banning” is a dishonest slogan designed to inflame people instead of inform them. And yes, I think defending that kind of material in schools is shameful. If that is the hill some pro-Canada activists want to die on, they should at least be honest about what they are defending. This whole exchange says a lot. Alberta independence supporters are constantly asked to explain what we are for, while Canada’s defenders too often fall back on emotional slogans, weak smears, and a vision of life that amounts to little more than survival. For us Albertans, this movement is about Freedom! We want a society that reflects our values and protects our rights and we have the will do make that happen. Please sign the petition! Go to: for a location near you! See the full video on YouTube:

Jon Alberta Patriot

19,833 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Act For Alberta launches billboard truck campaign to fuel independence movement Act For Alberta has kicked off a provincewide mobile billboard campaign aimed at building support for Alberta independence and pushing back against Ottawa’s grip on the province. The registered third-party advertiser has hired Rebel News’s famous “Big, Beautiful Billboard Truck” to roll across Alberta with messages supporting sovereignty and challenging the federal political class. The truck made its first stop at the Alberta Legislature Building — and Rebel News was on scene to welcome it as the campaign officially hit the road. Albertans have spent decades being ignored, overtaxed and overruled by Canada’s Laurentian elite, while decisions affecting Alberta jobs, energy and freedoms are made thousands of kilometres away in Ottawa. Unlike legacy media outlets that often dismiss Western frustration, the billboard truck takes the message straight to the streets; impossible to censor, impossible to spin, and built for viral attention online and in person. Act For Alberta is one of several groups tapping into long-running anger over blocked pipelines, equalization payments, firearms policy, federal overreach and a political system many westerners believe is rigged against them. While separatism has long sat outside the mainstream, support tends to surge whenever Ottawa tightens the screws. And are they ever! The province will hold a direct referendum on independence and the right to choose its own future on October 19, 2026. REPORT by Sheila Gunn Reid:

Rebel News

10,572 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I was in Rocky Mountain House recently for a massive pro Alberta independence rally. Hundreds of people were waving Alberta flags and driving around town, and I found a small group of about seven pro-Canada counter protesters and decided to engage them. One man challenged me. He said that if Alberta independence loses, I should give up. I told him plainly that yes, if we lose, I will respect the will of the voters. Then I asked him the same question back. If Alberta wins, will you accept it? He reluctantly said yes, but the moment I pressed him on what percentage he would accept, he would not even engage with the argument. He would not clearly accept a majority. That tells you a lot. For too many on the pro-Canada side, this is not really about democracy. It is about imposing their will on Albertans who disagree with them, then using shame and fear to pressure us into silence. The second part of his argument was that the independence movement is hurting investment in Alberta. My answer was that Ottawa already did that and we have nothing to loose. For years, federal policy has blocked pipelines, restricted market access, and damaged confidence in Alberta’s future. Then, when Albertans finally start pushing back, we are told that we are the problem. He even claimed there is no tanker ban. That is factually false. Canada’s Oil Tanker Moratorium Act does restrict large crude oil and persistent-oil tankers from stopping, loading, or unloading at ports on BC’s north coast. The details matter, but the broader point stands: Ottawa has put real barriers in the way of Alberta getting its resources to market. His response was basically, if that is true, then why is Alberta still so rich and prosperous? My answer was simple: because we work hard, we have a lot going for us, and it takes a lot to sink us. But that does not prove Canada is working. It proves Alberta is strong enough to keep carrying a country that keeps dragging us down. Canada feels more and more like a sinking ship, and Alberta is the last thing holding it up. That is why I support independence. Please sign the petition. Go to to find a signing location near you. See the full video on YouTube here:

Jon Alberta Patriot

14,425 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I found an hour-long livestream that CHIRLA, a nonprofit primarily funded by the State of California, posted on YouTube yesterday. As the LA riots had gone on for days, they continued their extremist rhetoric, trying to foment fear in the Spanish-speaking community. I am so disturbed by this video that I struggle to put the reasons into words. Here is a snippet: “You are going to become literally an activist, activating others to also please share this information that we are going to review. My people, let's dive right in. We don't have any more time. It's very, very important that we all be very, very informed, given the unfortunate situation we are experiencing here in Los Angeles, in Southern California. Well, today's topic is that we are going to break down what are the rights we have as immigrants. It's important, and part of it is not just knowing what our rights are. Please share it—I insist—share it with everyone. Also, how to be prepared. Today we no longer have the option to say, 'I'll prepare tomorrow.' No, today we have to be prepared for the worst, and part of that preparation can decide how things go for us in a case, unfortunately, whether we are detained or not. So, it's important that we empower others this way as well. So, as we've already witnessed here, especially in the last four days, my people, our community has been the target of attacks, and these attacks have been brutal by ICE. And I'm going to be very direct because they are. These attacks are brutal against our communities, carrying out orders from an administration that—this administration is ruthless, and although it promised to focus on criminals, it has demonstrated with actions completely the opposite. What we have seen and what we see is a systematic persecution against our people. People, for example—workers who with dignity seek their daily sustenance in places like Home Depot. Families, for example, who fulfill their duty to appear before immigration courts as required, and yet they are detained. They are literally taken and detained. And why not? The saddest thing is seeing minors—children who are being marked by the trauma of seeing their mother or father taken away. And this, without a doubt, cannot be called anything other than brutal attacks against our community, the hardest-working community that characterizes us as a working community. And what is undeniable is that this administration is systematically and arbitrarily violating the due process of fundamental rights of people. It is a fundamental right protected by the United States Constitution itself. What this administration doesn't understand is that it is violating the rights already established in the Constitution. The opinion of this administration does not override the United States Constitution itself. And this is how the rights of our communities are being violated, and the very law of the United States is being violated. And today more than ever, it is necessary for us all to learn the importance of having a family plan. And that is why CHIRLA’s motto has been ‘Get ready to stay.’”

Laura Powell

34,271 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Alberta-based class-action lawsuit seeks justice for those harmed by COVID-19 vaccines Law firm Rath & Company has filed a class-action lawsuit against the federal and Alberta provincial governments on behalf of Albertans who have suffered debilitating injuries from the COVID-19 vaccines. The lawsuit claims that the governments engaged in “unlawful, negligent, inadequate, improper, unfair, and deceptive practices” related to the warning, promotion, and distribution of these novel pharmaceutical products. At the heart of the claim is Carrie Sakamoto, a young mother from Lethbridge whose personal vaccine injury 10.5 million-dollar lawsuit pivoted into a class action, representing potentially thousands of Albertans facing debilitating, long-term effects from the widely promoted but highly controversial COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Sakamoto’s legal team, led by lawyers Jeffrey Rath and Eva Chipiuk (Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM), argues that the government intentionally withheld crucial information about the vaccines before mandating them. Rath emphasizes that their case challenges the blanket assumption that the vaccines are safe and effective, and the goal of a trial would be to enter into public record evidence proving otherwise. The lawsuit is scheduled for a case management hearing tomorrow, a crucial step where the key issues in dispute will be identified. However, Rath criticizes this as a “delay tactic” and an “abuse of process.” Chipiuk points to the government's failure to adequately address the severity of vaccine injuries, which have been largely ignored by programs like the Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP). This lawsuit is more than just a legal battle — it’s an urgent call for accountability and a potential precedent for future public health responses. As legal action unfolds, will this be Canadians' only hope for the government to take responsibility for the widespread harm caused by its vaccine rollout? REPORT by Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦:

Rebel News

96,114 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr