Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Alex O'Connor Misunderstands History

32,331 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

22 Kommentare

Profilbild von Matt Fradd
Matt Fraddvor 8 Monaten

Full episode:

Profilbild von dharmafi
dharmafivor 8 Monaten

Matt, As long as you work for Ben Shapiro and the daily wire, it seems you misunderstand integrity.

Profilbild von 𝙹𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚙𝚑 𝙻. 𝙱𝚊𝚔𝚎𝚛 ✝️🇬🇧
𝙹𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚙𝚑 𝙻. 𝙱𝚊𝚔𝚎𝚛 ✝️🇬🇧vor 8 Monaten

Has the quality of your podcast declined, or has it always been this poor?

Profilbild von Les
Lesvor 8 Monaten

The absence of a narrated appearance in the Mark's original text does not negate the Gospel's powerful witness to the resurrection.

Profilbild von Zedd
Zeddvor 8 Monaten

Can you please provide a citation for the claim that myths require centuries to develop?

Profilbild von (D.C.) Debating a Christian
(D.C.) Debating a Christianvor 8 Monaten

Did he say no post resurrection appearance in Mark? Are they blind? "He is risen," and "He is going before you into Galilee; there you will see Him, as He said to you." see Mark 16:6-7

Profilbild von Eryngium ovinum
Eryngium ovinumvor 8 Monaten

This man is dishonest. The myths about historical events like Jan 6 & 9/11 developed in a matter of minutes.

Profilbild von Dan Paterson (QC)
Dan Paterson (QC)vor 8 Monaten

@RealMattFradd check out why Alex’s development hypothesis falls short here:

Profilbild von Summer in the Dark Ages
Summer in the Dark Agesvor 8 Monaten

He's an arrogant, self righteous, entitled twat.

Profilbild von GOku
GOkuvor 8 Monaten

Mark mentioned resurrection but he left out the post resurrection appearance on purpose. This should be common knowledge

Profilbild von Arni 🇫🇴
Arni 🇫🇴vor 8 Monaten

1 Corinthians 15 was written before Mark.

Profilbild von Urban Warfare 7-0
Urban Warfare 7-0vor 8 Monaten

The episode of Alex O’Connor’s show where he has Dr. Pitre on is outstanding. You can tell how much they’re both enjoying the conversation

Profilbild von jon bickle
jon bicklevor 8 Monaten

So wrong. Myths can spread within days not centuries e.g. the war of the worlds radio panic, Momo, Paul McCartney being dead, Caesar resurrecting, curse of the pharaohs etc Embarrassing.....

Profilbild von MaximusEnthusiast
MaximusEnthusiastvor 8 Monaten

Brant Pitre is so good

Profilbild von Midgard Walker
Midgard Walkervor 8 Monaten

Jesus is dead. None of this matters.

Profilbild von GPTan
GPTanvor 8 Monaten

so instead of taking centuries, which implies natural development... 🤔 it only took decades? that sounds worse! that suggests intentional aggressive manipulation!😲

Profilbild von Steve R
Steve Rvor 8 Monaten

I love Alex, but he does seem to be backsliding. It sounds like he may have fallen in with certain postmodernist tiktok authorities on the bible. Iykyk.

Profilbild von Bro. Steve
Bro. Stevevor 8 Monaten

O'Connor also presumes Mark came first. Ancient authors said Matthew was first. O'Connor's theory of myth development falls to pieces if we just go with the oldest testimony about which Gospel writer came first.

Profilbild von Dustin
Dustinvor 8 Monaten

Stop being a sellout Kook

Profilbild von Drew
Drewvor 8 Monaten

"The gospels are not mythological, they're supernatural." I like that.

Profilbild von PartyMcFly ✠ ☧🇻🇦🦁
PartyMcFly ✠ ☧🇻🇦🦁vor 8 Monaten

Goofy ahh “Category Error O’Connor” 😂

Profilbild von Anna Ghilarducci
Anna Ghilarduccivor 8 Monaten

He is correct

Ähnliche Videos