Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 “Ali Khamenei’s death was caused by deep internal infiltration.” That is the striking claim now being made by Mehdi Kharatian, a figure linked to Iran’s intelligence and policy circles, who says Ali Khamenei was constantly moved between secure locations under a highly complex security system. Kharatian stated that...

26,436 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The IDF struck the Iranian leadership complex, the most important and central headquarters of the regime. Guided with precision by AMAN (Israeli Military Intelligence), the Israeli Air Force targeted security and government buildings within the Iranian terror regime’s leadership complex in the heart of Tehran overnight. The strike hit the presidential office and the Supreme National Security Council building. In addition, the compound used by the regime’s highest decision-making forum, responsible for security decisions, as well as the Iranian army officer training institute and other key infrastructure, was targeted. The leadership complex of the terror regime is one of the most heavily secured assets in Iran, spanning multiple streets in central Tehran. The regime’s leaders and security officials frequently convened in the compound, using it to conduct, among other things, assessments of Iran’s nuclear program and advance the plan to destroy the State of Israel. The compound was used by the Iranian terror regime leader who was eliminated, Ali Khamenei, and housed infrastructure that directed and funded the regime’s terror operatives and attacks against Israel. The strike came after an extensive intelligence-gathering process carried out by AMAN. This is the most important and central headquarters for the Iranian terror regime, and the attack significantly disrupts the continuity of the regime’s command and control systems.

Open Source Intel

80,664 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 Arrest of Mullah Mutasim : The Taliban initially denied any arrest, reflecting a pattern of information control and delayed acknowledgement of internal actions. Internally, Mutasim was detained on direct orders of Haibatullah Akhundzada and picked up by his special unit, indicating centralised enforcement authority. He was accused within internal circles of creating divisions within Taliban ranks and facilitating equipping of aligned individuals. Following his arrest, Taliban authorities initiated raids on homes and compounds of their own members, particularly in Kandahar and Kabul, aimed at disarming those suspected of being part of his network. The episode triggered a wider internal security sweep, highlighting distrust within segments of the Taliban’s own structure. Mutasim had been openly critical of Haibatullah’s policies, positioning himself within a dissenting current inside the movement. His background as a former Qatar-based Shura figure and his known connections with Middle Eastern intelligence-linked circles contributed to suspicion within Taliban ranks. These external linkages are assessed to have been a key vulnerability, creating space for perception that foreign/Middle East intelligence agencies could exploit internal Taliban fault lines. He had previously been removed from internal structures over suspicions of links with foreign intelligence networks, reinforcing long-standing trust deficits. Mutasim was later brought back into Afghanistan by Mullah Yaqoob, partly due to historical proximity to Mullah Omar and his regional connections. Recent reporting indicates his involvement with anti-Haibatullah groupings, particularly among Kabul-based leadership factions. The immediate trigger cited internally for his arrest was his remarks against Mullah Baradar, reportedly referring to him in derogatory terms. The arrest therefore reflects both personal-level friction and broader factional contestation between Kandahar-centric leadership and other power centres. Following assurances from the Haqqani Network, Mutasim was released, indicating intra-group bargaining and balance-of-power dynamics. The Haqqani intervention suggests the episode may also be linked to factional alignments and their own networked relationships, which can shape internal decision reversals. No official Taliban statement acknowledged the charges; instead, an unofficial cover narrative claims a “misunderstanding” by a commander who has since been dismissed. This managed narrative suggests an attempt to contain reputational damage and prevent escalation of visible internal divisions. Overall, the incident underscores ongoing fragmentation risks within Taliban ranks, masked through controlled public messaging and selective disclosure.

Eagle Eye

12,296 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад