Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
ALL TALK! Duterte technically not taking responsibility as claimed In several instances during his presidency, Former President Duterte assured the police and other enforcement officers that he will take full legal responsibility for his orders in his bloody War on Drugs. In the recently conducted Senate Blue Ribbon committee... show more
35,743 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
9 Comments
This attack on Duterte’s statement about taking full responsibility for the War on Drugs is nothing but a desperate attempt to undermine a leader who acted with conviction and tried to protect the country from the grip of drugs. First off, Duterte was always clear that the responsibility lies with those who execute the orders, whether legal or not, and that accountability is a matter of personal guilt. The statement “guilt is personal” is a reflection of the idea that individuals who commit crimes under any policy must answer for their actions. It’s clear as day: Duterte said if anyone steps outside the boundaries of the law, he would not shield them. But let’s get real, here. Are you really suggesting that an entire war, a complex operation across the nation, should rest solely on one man’s shoulders? This isn’t about deflecting blame, it’s about ensuring that those who overstep are held accountable. As for the so-called “conflicting statements,” you’re conveniently ignoring the fact that Duterte’s “full legal responsibility” wasn’t about taking a bullet for every officer, it was about the bigger picture, dealing with a massive drug epidemic that threatened the nation’s future. And if those officers followed the rules of engagement and acted within the law, then there should be no issue. But if they strayed from those guidelines, Duterte’s commitment was clear: they would answer for their actions. And let’s talk about the House Quad Committee, shall we? It’s cute that they’re trying to show the Senate how it’s done, but here’s the truth: committees come and go. The fact that this is being turned into a political show just reveals the utter lack of genuine concern for the lives lost in the War on Drugs. What is being done to help those affected by drugs in this country? Where’s the empathy for the real victims of this plague? Duterte didn’t “leave anyone hanging.” He laid out a clear directive: fight the drug problem within the bounds of the law. Now, whether some chose to step out of line is their responsibility. But let’s not twist his words to suit your political agenda. Duterte didn’t just talk; he acted. And let’s not forget, the War on Drugs, for all its controversy, was born out of a very real need to save the nation from a drug epidemic. Those who want to keep playing politics with it need to understand that this isn’t just a war of words, it’s a war for the survival of the country’s future.
Why would somebody compel him of his response. First of all, hindi korte ang house, 2nd hindi accused si Digong kundi resource person. Gets mo po ba? Wag tatanga tanga, Just.🥹✌🏼✌🏼✌🏼
Oks 🤣 Pero iniwan pa rin niya sa ere yung nga tao
pinutol mo nman yung video, andun yung explanation about “taking responsibilty vs admission of guilt” yun ang di magets eh..
President is there to set up policies, wheher it is followed legally or illegally by the authorities is their responsibility!!Unless you could provide documents showing an order to shoot all drug pushers and drug addicts indiscriminately, without reason, that's another thing!😂😂
@justinmaniluh THE SLUT ! Puro NONSENSE ng mga BANAT mo ahas 🤣🤣🤣. Maitim cguro pooki neto wahahaha
Which never counted. Everybody knew extrajudicial killing is illegal.
Hindi nyo kasi makuha , he takes full responsibility sa pulis who was accused of ejk based on his order regarding WAR ON DRUGS. Ibang usapan yung pulis ba gumawa ng krimen based on his personal volition and just using WAR ON DRUGS as an excuse.
How about the quad com All talk din namn.
![[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2054652118766952473/amplify_video_thumb/2054651071256031232/img/hHJ1zaS5Ba9ZQ_h9.jpg)
