Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Allowing cheap Chinese electric vehicles to enter Canada may accelerate EV adoption, but don’t expect deeper industrial or economic benefits. China gets market access without helping Canada build anything. 1/6

MichaelKovrig's profile picture

Michael Kovrig

23,450 subscribers

67,829 просмотров • 23 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

I don’t believe the U.S. Canada trade war is built to last. America needs critical resources like uranium and potash, and Canada needs stable access to the U.S. market. Long term, these economies are too strategically connected to stay divided by tariffs. The real outcome should be deeper economic cooperation, not pushing Canada closer to China.
2:14

I don’t believe the U.S. Canada trade war is built to last. America needs critical resources like uranium and potash, and Canada needs stable access to the U.S. market. Long term, these economies are too strategically connected to stay divided by tariffs. The real outcome should be deeper economic cooperation, not pushing Canada closer to China.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

113,189 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Seems like Elon Musk has lost EV market for Tesla in Canada for good👀 Mark Carney slashes Canada's 100% tariff on Chinese EVs and announces that up to 49,000 Chinese electric cars will be imported into Canada with only a 6.1% tariff. In return, China has agreed to slash tariffs on canola imports from 84% to 15% by March 1.
0:46

Seems like Elon Musk has lost EV market for Tesla in Canada for good👀 Mark Carney slashes Canada's 100% tariff on Chinese EVs and announces that up to 49,000 Chinese electric cars will be imported into Canada with only a 6.1% tariff. In return, China has agreed to slash tariffs on canola imports from 84% to 15% by March 1.

Mario

1,385,408 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

.Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 explains how Mark Carney is using Canada to help the Chinese Communist Party invade America's economy and compromise our security: “China now sees Canada as an entry point, not just into the US market. But in that Global Times propaganda piece yesterday, they noted that Canada is part of the Five Eyes security group… they said that Canada is a FORMER close ally [with the U.S.] and they say it's quite noteworthy that Canada is rebuffing America, even though it still has this deep access. So China can't believe their luck. They couldn't keep it to themselves. They boasted about this. Not only is Carney allowing Chinese steel to sneak in, be relabeled, and then shipped at dumping prices into America, but I don't know if you know this: Last year, when Carney went to China and announced that he was joining the Chinese new world order, he threw them a bone that had never been given to them before. He said, 'China, you can sell into Canada 49,000 electric vehicles a year, and that's going to go up.' You know what an electric vehicle is, though? It's like an iPhone with wheels! It's got so many sensors, it is a data collector! Those are 49,000 spyware vehicles being dumped into Canada!”
2:47

.Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 explains how Mark Carney is using Canada to help the Chinese Communist Party invade America's economy and compromise our security: “China now sees Canada as an entry point, not just into the US market. But in that Global Times propaganda piece yesterday, they noted that Canada is part of the Five Eyes security group… they said that Canada is a FORMER close ally [with the U.S.] and they say it's quite noteworthy that Canada is rebuffing America, even though it still has this deep access. So China can't believe their luck. They couldn't keep it to themselves. They boasted about this. Not only is Carney allowing Chinese steel to sneak in, be relabeled, and then shipped at dumping prices into America, but I don't know if you know this: Last year, when Carney went to China and announced that he was joining the Chinese new world order, he threw them a bone that had never been given to them before. He said, 'China, you can sell into Canada 49,000 electric vehicles a year, and that's going to go up.' You know what an electric vehicle is, though? It's like an iPhone with wheels! It's got so many sensors, it is a data collector! Those are 49,000 spyware vehicles being dumped into Canada!”

Glenn Beck

112,719 просмотров • 9 дней назад

The real danger in Canada-China trade isn’t scale. It’s over-dependence. China can buy Canadian goods, but it’s risky to let a sector or company become so dependent on the Chinese market that Beijing can use that dependence to apply political pressure. That isn’t a hypothetical. The Chinese Communist Party has a history of weaponising trade and economic ties to achieve its political objectives.
1:37

The real danger in Canada-China trade isn’t scale. It’s over-dependence. China can buy Canadian goods, but it’s risky to let a sector or company become so dependent on the Chinese market that Beijing can use that dependence to apply political pressure. That isn’t a hypothetical. The Chinese Communist Party has a history of weaponising trade and economic ties to achieve its political objectives.

Michael Kovrig

113,377 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

China makes some of those most advanced electric vehicles in the world, and ensuring Canadians have access to affordable EVs means working with global partners. That’s why I met with some of the largest EV manufacturers like BYD, XPeng and Aion in Guangzhou to discuss collaboration and investment in Canada’s leading automotive sector and utilizing the Canadian supply chains to build the very cars in Canada. We are working diligently so that Canadians have better options when it comes to affordable electric vehicles.
1:01

China makes some of those most advanced electric vehicles in the world, and ensuring Canadians have access to affordable EVs means working with global partners. That’s why I met with some of the largest EV manufacturers like BYD, XPeng and Aion in Guangzhou to discuss collaboration and investment in Canada’s leading automotive sector and utilizing the Canadian supply chains to build the very cars in Canada. We are working diligently so that Canadians have better options when it comes to affordable electric vehicles.

Maninder Sidhu

32,469 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇨🇦 Protect Canadian jobs or lose them. Doug Ford Flooding our market with cheap, state-subsidized Chinese EVs would gut Canadian auto workers and wipe out domestic manufacturing. That’s not “free trade.” That’s imported job loss. If Ottawa is serious about workers, it must keep the 100% tariff on Chinese EVs ..no carve-outs, no backsliding. You don’t build an EV industry by surrendering it. ⚙️🚗 #cdnpoli #Canada #AutoJobs #EVs #Trade
1:20

🇨🇦 Protect Canadian jobs or lose them. Doug Ford Flooding our market with cheap, state-subsidized Chinese EVs would gut Canadian auto workers and wipe out domestic manufacturing. That’s not “free trade.” That’s imported job loss. If Ottawa is serious about workers, it must keep the 100% tariff on Chinese EVs ..no carve-outs, no backsliding. You don’t build an EV industry by surrendering it. ⚙️🚗 #cdnpoli #Canada #AutoJobs #EVs #Trade

wealthmoose

15,047 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Scott Bessent refused to accept ABC’s “trade war” framing — and he made that clear in seconds. When Jonathan Karl suggested President Trump was picking a fight with Canada, Bessent flipped the script and pointed straight at Prime Minister Mark Carney’s China problem. KARL: “Why is Donald Trump threatening Canada with another trade war?” BESSENT: “Prime minister carney came back, dropped some industry specific tariffs on Chinese goods and we have a highly integrated market with Canada.” “He dropped the EV tariff from 100% to 6%, goods can cross the border during the manufacturing process six times.” “We can’t let Canada become an opening that the Chinese pour cheap goods into the U.S.” “We have a USMCA agreement, but based on that, which is renegotiated this summer, and I’m not sure what Prime Minister Carney is doing here, other than trying to virtue signal to his globalist friends at Davos, I don’t think he is doing the best job for the Canadian people.”
0:55

Scott Bessent refused to accept ABC’s “trade war” framing — and he made that clear in seconds. When Jonathan Karl suggested President Trump was picking a fight with Canada, Bessent flipped the script and pointed straight at Prime Minister Mark Carney’s China problem. KARL: “Why is Donald Trump threatening Canada with another trade war?” BESSENT: “Prime minister carney came back, dropped some industry specific tariffs on Chinese goods and we have a highly integrated market with Canada.” “He dropped the EV tariff from 100% to 6%, goods can cross the border during the manufacturing process six times.” “We can’t let Canada become an opening that the Chinese pour cheap goods into the U.S.” “We have a USMCA agreement, but based on that, which is renegotiated this summer, and I’m not sure what Prime Minister Carney is doing here, other than trying to virtue signal to his globalist friends at Davos, I don’t think he is doing the best job for the Canadian people.”

Overton

198,050 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

They promised Canadians affordable electric vehicles. What we actually got is a $119,000 Chinese EV rolling into the country tariff-free. That’s right. While regular families are getting crushed by housing costs, groceries, and inflation, the Liberals cut a deal to flood Canada with 49,000 Chinese EVs. The first one on the lot? A Lotus Electra starting at $119,000. “Affordable” my ass. Even worse? National security experts are raising serious red flags about these vehicles collecting data and potentially sending it straight back to China. The CEO says “don’t worry, we’re compliant.” Yeah, that’s real comforting. This is what Liberal EV policy actually looks like: - Broken promises on affordability - Handing market share to China - Ignoring security risks - Pretending this helps the average Canadian They told us this was about the environment and saving money. Turns out it was about virtue signaling and screwing over Canadian workers and consumers at the same time. Are 🫵 done with the lies? #cdnpoli #ChinaEV #LiberalFail #CanadaFirst #EVScam #NationalSecurity
1:44

They promised Canadians affordable electric vehicles. What we actually got is a $119,000 Chinese EV rolling into the country tariff-free. That’s right. While regular families are getting crushed by housing costs, groceries, and inflation, the Liberals cut a deal to flood Canada with 49,000 Chinese EVs. The first one on the lot? A Lotus Electra starting at $119,000. “Affordable” my ass. Even worse? National security experts are raising serious red flags about these vehicles collecting data and potentially sending it straight back to China. The CEO says “don’t worry, we’re compliant.” Yeah, that’s real comforting. This is what Liberal EV policy actually looks like: - Broken promises on affordability - Handing market share to China - Ignoring security risks - Pretending this helps the average Canadian They told us this was about the environment and saving money. Turns out it was about virtue signaling and screwing over Canadian workers and consumers at the same time. Are 🫵 done with the lies? #cdnpoli #ChinaEV #LiberalFail #CanadaFirst #EVScam #NationalSecurity

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

28,640 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

VP Vance was asked about the ongoing tariff negotiations with Canada, and what he’d say to Maine businesses and consumers worried about the impact of those tariffs. His answer was 🔥🔥🔥 "Well, first of all, I’d say we’re very mindful of the fact that Maine is a border state with Canada. There’s a lot of cross-border transaction between Maine and Canada. And what we’re trying to do here is just make sure that Maine actually gets a fair deal. If you look at the amount of tariffs that have been applied not just on Maine but on a lot of our northern states that are doing cross-border trade with Canada, Canada and China have been the two worst countries when it comes to trade policy anywhere in the world. What a shame that is. China, you, of course, expect. They’re our biggest economic competitor. I would expect that from China. I would not expect that from Canada. We have to remember, Canada is a state—sorry, Freudian slip. That was actually an accident. 🤣🤣🤣 Canada is a country that has underinvested in its military that quite literally would get invaded by a foreign country were it not for the umbrella of protection provided by the United States of America. And so how does Canada actually respond to that? By treating the people of Maine fairly? No. They apply ridiculous tariffs and other non-tariff duties on Maine products coming into Canada, and they don’t expect Maine or anybody else to fight back. We’re sick of that. We are actually going to fight back against unfair trade practices whether it’s coming from China or Canada. Now, let me just give you a very, very simple and concrete example. If you buy dairy, cheese, butter, milk that comes from Canada into Maine, you probably are buying a product that has 0% tariffs on it. And by the way, if Canada applied 0%, that would be one thing. But you know, if a Maine farmer sends dairy products into Canada, they could be paying as much as a 250% tariff. Now, how is it fair to the farmers of Maine that they pay 250% when the Canadian farmers pay nothing? That unfairness is something that we just have to fix. And here’s what happened with the most recent round of negotiations. They’re still ongoing, and I want to be respectful of the process. But we know that Canada allows itself to be used as a backdoor for Chinese goods. They treat Chinese goods more fairly than they do the goods that come from the people of Maine. It’s insanity. And what we’ve said to Canada is stop it. Apply a basic principle of fairness to the trade that you’re doing between North Dakota and Canada, between Maine and Canada. And what happened at the very end is they came in with a bunch of unreasonable last-minute demands. I frankly thought we had a deal. I think that we should have a deal. But I think that we need to send a message loud and clear to the Prime Minister of Canada. STOP taking advantage of the people of Maine. Stop taking advantage of America. It’s over. We expect fairness in our trade policy." WELL SAID!
3:28

VP Vance was asked about the ongoing tariff negotiations with Canada, and what he’d say to Maine businesses and consumers worried about the impact of those tariffs. His answer was 🔥🔥🔥 "Well, first of all, I’d say we’re very mindful of the fact that Maine is a border state with Canada. There’s a lot of cross-border transaction between Maine and Canada. And what we’re trying to do here is just make sure that Maine actually gets a fair deal. If you look at the amount of tariffs that have been applied not just on Maine but on a lot of our northern states that are doing cross-border trade with Canada, Canada and China have been the two worst countries when it comes to trade policy anywhere in the world. What a shame that is. China, you, of course, expect. They’re our biggest economic competitor. I would expect that from China. I would not expect that from Canada. We have to remember, Canada is a state—sorry, Freudian slip. That was actually an accident. 🤣🤣🤣 Canada is a country that has underinvested in its military that quite literally would get invaded by a foreign country were it not for the umbrella of protection provided by the United States of America. And so how does Canada actually respond to that? By treating the people of Maine fairly? No. They apply ridiculous tariffs and other non-tariff duties on Maine products coming into Canada, and they don’t expect Maine or anybody else to fight back. We’re sick of that. We are actually going to fight back against unfair trade practices whether it’s coming from China or Canada. Now, let me just give you a very, very simple and concrete example. If you buy dairy, cheese, butter, milk that comes from Canada into Maine, you probably are buying a product that has 0% tariffs on it. And by the way, if Canada applied 0%, that would be one thing. But you know, if a Maine farmer sends dairy products into Canada, they could be paying as much as a 250% tariff. Now, how is it fair to the farmers of Maine that they pay 250% when the Canadian farmers pay nothing? That unfairness is something that we just have to fix. And here’s what happened with the most recent round of negotiations. They’re still ongoing, and I want to be respectful of the process. But we know that Canada allows itself to be used as a backdoor for Chinese goods. They treat Chinese goods more fairly than they do the goods that come from the people of Maine. It’s insanity. And what we’ve said to Canada is stop it. Apply a basic principle of fairness to the trade that you’re doing between North Dakota and Canada, between Maine and Canada. And what happened at the very end is they came in with a bunch of unreasonable last-minute demands. I frankly thought we had a deal. I think that we should have a deal. But I think that we need to send a message loud and clear to the Prime Minister of Canada. STOP taking advantage of the people of Maine. Stop taking advantage of America. It’s over. We expect fairness in our trade policy." WELL SAID!

JJ🕊️

189,376 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Brian Kingston, president of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers Association, defends the Canadian auto sector against Carney's Chinese EV deal "Once you let them in, they will dump product in market and they will continue to gain market share." "This should be a warning to any jurisdiction that's contemplating this. They allow Chinese EVs in... But they're now at a point where since 2024 they have lost 90,000 auto jobs in Europe." Cochrane "I think China is a great, reliable partner." 🤦‍♂️ Kingston "And number one is, yes, you have to get rid of the EV mandate." "Under this current framework, in this quota of 49,000 vehicles, Chinese OEMs could now be in receiving $980 million a year in EV compliance credits paid for by companies in Canada... So I think for that reason alone, the mandate has to go." "But there's more that can be done." Brian Kingston Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association
7:22

Brian Kingston, president of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers Association, defends the Canadian auto sector against Carney's Chinese EV deal "Once you let them in, they will dump product in market and they will continue to gain market share." "This should be a warning to any jurisdiction that's contemplating this. They allow Chinese EVs in... But they're now at a point where since 2024 they have lost 90,000 auto jobs in Europe." Cochrane "I think China is a great, reliable partner." 🤦‍♂️ Kingston "And number one is, yes, you have to get rid of the EV mandate." "Under this current framework, in this quota of 49,000 vehicles, Chinese OEMs could now be in receiving $980 million a year in EV compliance credits paid for by companies in Canada... So I think for that reason alone, the mandate has to go." "But there's more that can be done." Brian Kingston Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association

cbcwatcher

53,989 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨Warning to Canadians: Mark Carney just referenced Brazil as a model for Chinese car manufacturing "We are only interested in Chinese investment in Canada." — but look what actually happened there In Brazil, Chinese brands like BYD flooded the market with cheap EVs, promising "investment" and local plants. Instead: Severe labor scandals with "slave-like" conditions on construction sites (overcrowded dorms, confiscated passports, exploited workers) 📉Local auto industry hammered — jobs lost, suppliers crushed, forcing Brazil to hike tariffs again to protect what's left 📉Heavy reliance on imports and Chinese supply chains, not real domestic manufacturing Now Carney's deal opens Canada to thousands of these subsidized Chinese EVs while pushing his EV mandates Europe has seen strikingly similar issues with Chinese car manufacturing and imports as Brazil, particularly labor exploitation involving Chinese migrant workers, economic threats to the local auto industry, and policy backlash via tariffs. The pattern mirrors Brazil's experience: rapid market penetration by subsidized Chinese EVs (BYD, Chery, etc), promises of local factories, but accompanied by controversies over working conditions, de-industrialization fears, and heavy reliance on Chinese supply chains/labour Our auto sector (Ontario jobs, supply chains) is already under pressure from US tariffs. Do we really want to repeat Brazil's mistakes — flooding the market with Beijing-backed cars at the expense of Canadian workers? Prioritize Buy Canadian and North American manufacturing, not cheap imports that come with hidden costs. Net Zero Carney keeps seeing his shadow
2:29

🚨Warning to Canadians: Mark Carney just referenced Brazil as a model for Chinese car manufacturing "We are only interested in Chinese investment in Canada." — but look what actually happened there In Brazil, Chinese brands like BYD flooded the market with cheap EVs, promising "investment" and local plants. Instead: Severe labor scandals with "slave-like" conditions on construction sites (overcrowded dorms, confiscated passports, exploited workers) 📉Local auto industry hammered — jobs lost, suppliers crushed, forcing Brazil to hike tariffs again to protect what's left 📉Heavy reliance on imports and Chinese supply chains, not real domestic manufacturing Now Carney's deal opens Canada to thousands of these subsidized Chinese EVs while pushing his EV mandates Europe has seen strikingly similar issues with Chinese car manufacturing and imports as Brazil, particularly labor exploitation involving Chinese migrant workers, economic threats to the local auto industry, and policy backlash via tariffs. The pattern mirrors Brazil's experience: rapid market penetration by subsidized Chinese EVs (BYD, Chery, etc), promises of local factories, but accompanied by controversies over working conditions, de-industrialization fears, and heavy reliance on Chinese supply chains/labour Our auto sector (Ontario jobs, supply chains) is already under pressure from US tariffs. Do we really want to repeat Brazil's mistakes — flooding the market with Beijing-backed cars at the expense of Canadian workers? Prioritize Buy Canadian and North American manufacturing, not cheap imports that come with hidden costs. Net Zero Carney keeps seeing his shadow

cbcwatcher

92,158 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇪🇺🇨🇳 European carmakers spent decades transferring their technology to China in exchange for market access. Now they're using Chinese factories to build their own cars cheaper and ship them back home. VW says it can produce an EV in China for half what it costs anywhere else. Nissan is targeting 300,000 exports from China by 2030. A Chinese-made Chery became the best-selling new car in the UK in March. China can produce up to 50 million cars a year but only sold 24 million domestically last year, so factories are desperate for volume. Chinese car exports have gone from under 1 million in 2020 to over 7 million last year. Meanwhile, some European factories are running below 50% capacity. At some point "competing with China" became "manufacturing in China." Nobody's quite sure when that happened. Source: Financial Times
0:54

🇪🇺🇨🇳 European carmakers spent decades transferring their technology to China in exchange for market access. Now they're using Chinese factories to build their own cars cheaper and ship them back home. VW says it can produce an EV in China for half what it costs anywhere else. Nissan is targeting 300,000 exports from China by 2030. A Chinese-made Chery became the best-selling new car in the UK in March. China can produce up to 50 million cars a year but only sold 24 million domestically last year, so factories are desperate for volume. Chinese car exports have gone from under 1 million in 2020 to over 7 million last year. Meanwhile, some European factories are running below 50% capacity. At some point "competing with China" became "manufacturing in China." Nobody's quite sure when that happened. Source: Financial Times

Mario Nawfal

236,327 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🇵🇱🇨🇦🇨🇳 POLAND: CHINESE CARS ARE “ROLLING SPY DEVICES” - CANADIAN PREMIER AGREES Poland's defense ministry calls Chinese vehicles a confirmed threat, not just a potential risk. These cars are packed with sensors and electronics that could be quietly mapping military installations and collecting data on troop movements. As Chinese brands like BYD and MG flood Poland's auto market, defense officials are realizing that rolling surveillance devices are parking outside their most sensitive facilities. Poland may ban them from military bases entirely. Israel's military issued a similar ban last year amid concerns about leaked information from sensors and cameras. Meanwhile in Canada, Ontario Premier Doug Ford is furious about PM Mark Carney's recent deal with Beijing allowing limited Chinese EVs into the Canadian market at reduced tariffs. Ford warned it would facilitate Chinese espionage: "When you get on your cellphone, it's the Chinese that are going to be listening to your telephone conversation." Poland's basically figured out that letting Chinese cars cruise around military bases is like handing out all-access passes with cameras attached. Canada might be learning the same lesson. Sources: Bloomberg, CHCH
0:56

🇵🇱🇨🇦🇨🇳 POLAND: CHINESE CARS ARE “ROLLING SPY DEVICES” - CANADIAN PREMIER AGREES Poland's defense ministry calls Chinese vehicles a confirmed threat, not just a potential risk. These cars are packed with sensors and electronics that could be quietly mapping military installations and collecting data on troop movements. As Chinese brands like BYD and MG flood Poland's auto market, defense officials are realizing that rolling surveillance devices are parking outside their most sensitive facilities. Poland may ban them from military bases entirely. Israel's military issued a similar ban last year amid concerns about leaked information from sensors and cameras. Meanwhile in Canada, Ontario Premier Doug Ford is furious about PM Mark Carney's recent deal with Beijing allowing limited Chinese EVs into the Canadian market at reduced tariffs. Ford warned it would facilitate Chinese espionage: "When you get on your cellphone, it's the Chinese that are going to be listening to your telephone conversation." Poland's basically figured out that letting Chinese cars cruise around military bases is like handing out all-access passes with cameras attached. Canada might be learning the same lesson. Sources: Bloomberg, CHCH

Mario Nawfal

53,665 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Why is Canada on the verge of being annex? Canada has allowed itself to become a national security threat to America, or rather is "harboring" that national security threat. Last June, CCP operatives attempted to smuggle a pathogen into America that could have potentially wiped out 80% of US agricultural land. Not to mention the CCP biolabs they've found through America housing Ebola, Covid and other deadly pathogens. Only a fool would think these same labs aren't throughout rural Canada all along the border. The next time they try, they'll be coming through Canada's wide open Western border. Canada's CSIS (Canadian Security Intelligence Service) had warned about the CCP corrupting Canadian politicians and this fell on deaf ears. MP Micheal Ma, who was born in China crossed the isle to become a Liberal, helping Carney secure his majority government, a government no doubt sympathetic to China, and imposing policies that would benefit China including turning a blind eye to American security concerns, for example allowing CCP EV maker BYD to import Chinese EVs into the Canadian market place. Many think Trump is after Canada's resources, and that may be part of it for US national security reasons, but to think in light of Trump purging the CCP from Panama, Venezuela and Cuba only to allow them to remain on America's northern border, especially with the incoming "Golden Dome" missile defense system, is completely naive. I really wish Canadians would wake up and realize Trump is making moves to PROTECT the western hemisphere and that involves annexing Canada and Greenland in the not to distant future.
2:34

Why is Canada on the verge of being annex? Canada has allowed itself to become a national security threat to America, or rather is "harboring" that national security threat. Last June, CCP operatives attempted to smuggle a pathogen into America that could have potentially wiped out 80% of US agricultural land. Not to mention the CCP biolabs they've found through America housing Ebola, Covid and other deadly pathogens. Only a fool would think these same labs aren't throughout rural Canada all along the border. The next time they try, they'll be coming through Canada's wide open Western border. Canada's CSIS (Canadian Security Intelligence Service) had warned about the CCP corrupting Canadian politicians and this fell on deaf ears. MP Micheal Ma, who was born in China crossed the isle to become a Liberal, helping Carney secure his majority government, a government no doubt sympathetic to China, and imposing policies that would benefit China including turning a blind eye to American security concerns, for example allowing CCP EV maker BYD to import Chinese EVs into the Canadian market place. Many think Trump is after Canada's resources, and that may be part of it for US national security reasons, but to think in light of Trump purging the CCP from Panama, Venezuela and Cuba only to allow them to remain on America's northern border, especially with the incoming "Golden Dome" missile defense system, is completely naive. I really wish Canadians would wake up and realize Trump is making moves to PROTECT the western hemisphere and that involves annexing Canada and Greenland in the not to distant future.

Maverich

40,218 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

CBS Sunday Morning went to a London auto showroom and interviewed British car owners, traditional dealers and industry experts about the rise of Chinese EVs in Europe. What they found quietly destroys a lot of American mythology. British car owner Justin Watson is replacing his Lexus with a BYD. He described the ride as “like sitting on a throne” and said its technology, comfort and handling surpassed anything he had driven before. His conclusion was blunt: The era of “cheap Chinese cars don’t last” is over. A London dealer with more than 50 years in the business, long associated with Volkswagen, said he never imagined he would one day sell Chinese cars. Then he saw the quality, the technology and the sales growth. He changed his mind. Ben Nelmes of New Automotive explained why. Chinese EV makers now hold major advantages across batteries, supply chains and manufacturing integration. BYD started with batteries and built upward, controlling far more of its own production chain and allowing it to make cars at least 25% cheaper than Western competitors. And the technology is no longer “cheap imitation.” Chinese EVs are producing the things Western social media keeps going viral over: 360-degree tank turns. Emergency floating capability. Ultra-long range. Charging from 10% to 70% in minutes. The old stereotype of “Made in China = cheap and inferior” is collapsing in real time. Then comes the American part. The Biden administration imposed a 100% tariff on Chinese EVs. Trump kept the wall in place. In practical terms, Chinese EVs are shut out of the U.S. market. When CBS asked whether that protects American jobs, Nelmes gave the more uncomfortable answer: protectionism may protect jobs in the short term, but over time it kills competition, slows innovation, weakens consumer choice and leaves domestic automakers sheltered from the very future they are supposed to compete in. If the future of cars is electric, then blocking the world’s strongest EV competitors does not prepare American automakers for that future. It protects them from it. The irony gets worse. Before the segment ended, the British owner laughed that he had relatives in New Jersey who were “absolutely jealous” that he could drive such a good Chinese car. And here is the fact protectionists cannot explain away: BYD is effectively shut out of the U.S. market behind a 100% tariff wall, while Tesla is allowed to sell normally in China. And BYD still became the world’s top-selling battery-electric vehicle maker. China did not need to ban Tesla to compete with it. It let Tesla enter. Build locally. Sell freely. Fight for Chinese consumers. The United States looked at BYD and chose a wall. Yet even without access to the American market, BYD still outsold Tesla globally. That says more about competitiveness than a thousand speeches about “fair competition.” If your company needs its biggest rival excluded from your home market while that rival beats you everywhere else, you are not defending competitiveness. You are hiding from it.
4:04

CBS Sunday Morning went to a London auto showroom and interviewed British car owners, traditional dealers and industry experts about the rise of Chinese EVs in Europe. What they found quietly destroys a lot of American mythology. British car owner Justin Watson is replacing his Lexus with a BYD. He described the ride as “like sitting on a throne” and said its technology, comfort and handling surpassed anything he had driven before. His conclusion was blunt: The era of “cheap Chinese cars don’t last” is over. A London dealer with more than 50 years in the business, long associated with Volkswagen, said he never imagined he would one day sell Chinese cars. Then he saw the quality, the technology and the sales growth. He changed his mind. Ben Nelmes of New Automotive explained why. Chinese EV makers now hold major advantages across batteries, supply chains and manufacturing integration. BYD started with batteries and built upward, controlling far more of its own production chain and allowing it to make cars at least 25% cheaper than Western competitors. And the technology is no longer “cheap imitation.” Chinese EVs are producing the things Western social media keeps going viral over: 360-degree tank turns. Emergency floating capability. Ultra-long range. Charging from 10% to 70% in minutes. The old stereotype of “Made in China = cheap and inferior” is collapsing in real time. Then comes the American part. The Biden administration imposed a 100% tariff on Chinese EVs. Trump kept the wall in place. In practical terms, Chinese EVs are shut out of the U.S. market. When CBS asked whether that protects American jobs, Nelmes gave the more uncomfortable answer: protectionism may protect jobs in the short term, but over time it kills competition, slows innovation, weakens consumer choice and leaves domestic automakers sheltered from the very future they are supposed to compete in. If the future of cars is electric, then blocking the world’s strongest EV competitors does not prepare American automakers for that future. It protects them from it. The irony gets worse. Before the segment ended, the British owner laughed that he had relatives in New Jersey who were “absolutely jealous” that he could drive such a good Chinese car. And here is the fact protectionists cannot explain away: BYD is effectively shut out of the U.S. market behind a 100% tariff wall, while Tesla is allowed to sell normally in China. And BYD still became the world’s top-selling battery-electric vehicle maker. China did not need to ban Tesla to compete with it. It let Tesla enter. Build locally. Sell freely. Fight for Chinese consumers. The United States looked at BYD and chose a wall. Yet even without access to the American market, BYD still outsold Tesla globally. That says more about competitiveness than a thousand speeches about “fair competition.” If your company needs its biggest rival excluded from your home market while that rival beats you everywhere else, you are not defending competitiveness. You are hiding from it.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

15,864 просмотров • 27 дней назад

The EU has mastered one trick: When it wins, it calls it free trade. When China wins, it calls it overdependence. For decades, European cars, appliances, luxury goods, chemicals, machinery, and high-end consumer products entered the Chinese market. China did not cry that Europe was “distorting” its market or creating “dependency.” China competed. China learned. China upgraded. But the moment Chinese industries became competitive, Europe suddenly discovered “strategic risk.” Solar panels? Europe blocked and punished Chinese solar for years with tariffs and trade barriers. Did that revive Europe’s own solar industry? No. It only made Europe’s energy transition more expensive until it eventually had to reopen the door. Huawei and ZTE? Europe followed Washington’s pressure campaign, ripped out Chinese telecom infrastructure it had already deployed, spent more money, delayed its own networks, and called that “security.” Energy? Europe chose geopolitical obedience, cut itself off from cheap Russian energy, raised its own industrial costs, became more dependent on the U.S., and then watched its companies move across the Atlantic under American subsidies and tariffs. But somehow the problem is still China. Please. Europe’s crisis was not created by Chinese overcapacity. It was created by European complacency, American dependency, ideological industrial policy, expensive energy, and decades of mistaking moral lectures for competitiveness. Now Chinese industries are faster, cheaper, more integrated, and more efficient — from EVs to batteries, solar, electronics, ports, logistics, and manufacturing ecosystems. So Europe invents new language: “Diversification.” “De-risking.” “Overdependence.” “Fair competition.” But strip away the diplomatic costume, and it is just protectionism with Brussels paperwork. China did not force Europe to deindustrialize itself. Europe made its choices. It followed Washington. It sanctioned its own energy base. It taxed its own consumers. It slowed its own innovation. It lectured China while China built. And now it wants China to pay for Europe’s failure to compete. No. China-EU trade is not a charity program for declining European industries. If Europe wants competitiveness, it should build it. Not rename protectionism as “diversification” and expect China to applaud.
2:07

The EU has mastered one trick: When it wins, it calls it free trade. When China wins, it calls it overdependence. For decades, European cars, appliances, luxury goods, chemicals, machinery, and high-end consumer products entered the Chinese market. China did not cry that Europe was “distorting” its market or creating “dependency.” China competed. China learned. China upgraded. But the moment Chinese industries became competitive, Europe suddenly discovered “strategic risk.” Solar panels? Europe blocked and punished Chinese solar for years with tariffs and trade barriers. Did that revive Europe’s own solar industry? No. It only made Europe’s energy transition more expensive until it eventually had to reopen the door. Huawei and ZTE? Europe followed Washington’s pressure campaign, ripped out Chinese telecom infrastructure it had already deployed, spent more money, delayed its own networks, and called that “security.” Energy? Europe chose geopolitical obedience, cut itself off from cheap Russian energy, raised its own industrial costs, became more dependent on the U.S., and then watched its companies move across the Atlantic under American subsidies and tariffs. But somehow the problem is still China. Please. Europe’s crisis was not created by Chinese overcapacity. It was created by European complacency, American dependency, ideological industrial policy, expensive energy, and decades of mistaking moral lectures for competitiveness. Now Chinese industries are faster, cheaper, more integrated, and more efficient — from EVs to batteries, solar, electronics, ports, logistics, and manufacturing ecosystems. So Europe invents new language: “Diversification.” “De-risking.” “Overdependence.” “Fair competition.” But strip away the diplomatic costume, and it is just protectionism with Brussels paperwork. China did not force Europe to deindustrialize itself. Europe made its choices. It followed Washington. It sanctioned its own energy base. It taxed its own consumers. It slowed its own innovation. It lectured China while China built. And now it wants China to pay for Europe’s failure to compete. No. China-EU trade is not a charity program for declining European industries. If Europe wants competitiveness, it should build it. Not rename protectionism as “diversification” and expect China to applaud.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

47,411 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇨🇦 Starting May 1, 2026, Canada introduced co-payments for refugees and similar groups, about $4 per prescription and roughly 30% of the cost for certain additional services like dental and vision care. Meanwhile, Canadians without comparable health coverage through their employers have to pay 100% of those costs. It must be nice to come to another country, never contribute to its growth or economy, yet receive benefits that citizens who’ve worked for years don’t get. The Canadian government is putting immigrants ahead of its own people.
0:37

🇨🇦 Starting May 1, 2026, Canada introduced co-payments for refugees and similar groups, about $4 per prescription and roughly 30% of the cost for certain additional services like dental and vision care. Meanwhile, Canadians without comparable health coverage through their employers have to pay 100% of those costs. It must be nice to come to another country, never contribute to its growth or economy, yet receive benefits that citizens who’ve worked for years don’t get. The Canadian government is putting immigrants ahead of its own people.

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

75,549 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: 🚨 CANADA ON THE BRINK — IS ALBERTA ABOUT TO BREAK AWAY? 🚨 Tonight, I’m joined by author & proud Canadian patriot Peter MacIsaac — an Ambassador for Canada with Freedom Train International. And what he reveals is EXPLOSIVE. Canada is no longer just under Trudeau’s failed regime... It’s now fallen fully under the control of WEF puppet Mark Carney — Trudeau 2.0. 💥 Installed, not elected. 💥 Backed by the WEF. 💥 Funded by YOUR tax dollars. 💥 $700 MILLION to state media propaganda. Meanwhile: → CCP infiltration in Parliament. → Fentanyl-linked cartel operatives in leadership. → Central Bank Digital Currencies & Digital ID being rolled out. Peter MacIsaac sounds the alarm: “Half of Canada’s Parliament compromised by China. Carney directly profits from $250 MILLION owed to China. Alberta’s wealth is being drained to fund Ottawa’s globalist grip.” But here’s where it gets WILD… 💥 ALBERTA — Canada’s economic powerhouse — is rumbling with talk of INDEPENDENCE. Premier Danielle Smith has spoken directly with Trump. If Alberta goes — others may follow. And the WEF’s grip over Canada? FINISHED. But Peter fears what happens next: → Will Carney use Emergency Powers like Trudeau? → Could the RCMP or military be sent to CRUSH Alberta’s will? → Would Trump stand by if Alberta declared independence & was attacked? Could Canada be heading toward a CIVIL WAR? Could America step in? THIS IS THE REALITY THE MEDIA WON’T TOUCH. Alberta feeds Canada. Alberta fuels Canada. And Alberta may just FREE Canada. If you are from Alberta — I want to hear from YOU. Your voice matters. DM me. Comment below. Share this everywhere. The fight for Canada's future has begun. Peter R Mac Isaac
57:15

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: 🚨 CANADA ON THE BRINK — IS ALBERTA ABOUT TO BREAK AWAY? 🚨 Tonight, I’m joined by author & proud Canadian patriot Peter MacIsaac — an Ambassador for Canada with Freedom Train International. And what he reveals is EXPLOSIVE. Canada is no longer just under Trudeau’s failed regime... It’s now fallen fully under the control of WEF puppet Mark Carney — Trudeau 2.0. 💥 Installed, not elected. 💥 Backed by the WEF. 💥 Funded by YOUR tax dollars. 💥 $700 MILLION to state media propaganda. Meanwhile: → CCP infiltration in Parliament. → Fentanyl-linked cartel operatives in leadership. → Central Bank Digital Currencies & Digital ID being rolled out. Peter MacIsaac sounds the alarm: “Half of Canada’s Parliament compromised by China. Carney directly profits from $250 MILLION owed to China. Alberta’s wealth is being drained to fund Ottawa’s globalist grip.” But here’s where it gets WILD… 💥 ALBERTA — Canada’s economic powerhouse — is rumbling with talk of INDEPENDENCE. Premier Danielle Smith has spoken directly with Trump. If Alberta goes — others may follow. And the WEF’s grip over Canada? FINISHED. But Peter fears what happens next: → Will Carney use Emergency Powers like Trudeau? → Could the RCMP or military be sent to CRUSH Alberta’s will? → Would Trump stand by if Alberta declared independence & was attacked? Could Canada be heading toward a CIVIL WAR? Could America step in? THIS IS THE REALITY THE MEDIA WON’T TOUCH. Alberta feeds Canada. Alberta fuels Canada. And Alberta may just FREE Canada. If you are from Alberta — I want to hear from YOU. Your voice matters. DM me. Comment below. Share this everywhere. The fight for Canada's future has begun. Peter R Mac Isaac

Jim Ferguson

50,646 просмотров • 1 год назад