Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Almost no one talks about height control. This clip shows why it matters. A capacitive sensor on the cutting head keeps the nozzle only fractions of a millimeter above the metal sheet, even when the sheet is warped or vibrating. That tiny distance is everything for a clean cut.... The setup here: ✅ Kimla laser system ✅ Precitec cutting head ✅ Capacitive sensing for real-time height control ✅ Stable gap over uneven or bent sheets If the nozzle drifts even slightly, you lose cut quality, speed, and consistency. This is the part of laser systems that most people never think about, but it is what makes the difference between “it works” and “this is production ready.” Have you ever had to keep the nozzle as close as possible without risking a crash? Credit: Daltons Wadkin —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:show more

Ilir Aliu

53,740 subscribers

224,579 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Education News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This is real time. You can see how stable the motion is. A system placing droplets between 1 nanoliter and 1 microliter inside a 96 well plate with almost perfect repeatability. No shake. No drift. No overshoot. The robot keeps the tip on track even at this scale where tiny vibrations normally ruin the result. Why this matters: •In wet lab automation, volume accuracy is everything •Nano scale tasks fail fast if the robot is even slightly off •Reliable deposition unlocks fast screening and repeatable experiments •You can run full workflows without manual checking or correction This is the kind of precision that turns lab robots from “helpful tool” into a full automation pipeline. Credit: M2-Automation GmbH —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

This is real time. You can see how stable the motion is. A system placing droplets between 1 nanoliter and 1 microliter inside a 96 well plate with almost perfect repeatability. No shake. No drift. No overshoot. The robot keeps the tip on track even at this scale where tiny vibrations normally ruin the result. Why this matters: •In wet lab automation, volume accuracy is everything •Nano scale tasks fail fast if the robot is even slightly off •Reliable deposition unlocks fast screening and repeatable experiments •You can run full workflows without manual checking or correction This is the kind of precision that turns lab robots from “helpful tool” into a full automation pipeline. Credit: M2-Automation GmbH —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Ilir Aliu

286,979 views • 8 months ago

The most complicated challenge wasn’t stopping the migrants, or building the wall, or defunding the corrupt NGO’s. The most difficult challenge of this operation was showing the public that which has been hidden from them for many many years by a corrupt and treasonous mainstream media apparatus. ✅ The people had to see the drugs pouring over the border. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being bust all over the country. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being given privileges that even Americans don’t have ✅ The people had to see their hard earned dollars being robbed from them and given to people who came here illegally ✅ The people had to see them physically in their own cities, towns, and neighborhoods ✅ The people had to see a corrupt and treasonous judiciary system that would encourage criminal migrants to embed themselves within our country and sow chaos & crime Like it or not that is what the last four years were all about. And now you are seeing the results of the operation. Now you are seeing that public opinion, by CNN‘s own admission, is in Donald Trump‘s favor: “ no matter which way you cut it, the American public is with the Republicans, the American public is with Donald Trump to a much greater extent than they were in term number one. And it’s not just on the broad issue of immigration, it’s on the specifics as well, in which the American public is with Donald Trump and the Republicans. And that is why Donald Trump is eager to take on this fight.” 👉And that is why you are seeing the military begin to step in and clean up the mess. It is always been about manufacturing. The people‘s consent for those things which must be done. 🎥 Video Credit: @LatinosWithTrump

The most complicated challenge wasn’t stopping the migrants, or building the wall, or defunding the corrupt NGO’s. The most difficult challenge of this operation was showing the public that which has been hidden from them for many many years by a corrupt and treasonous mainstream media apparatus. ✅ The people had to see the drugs pouring over the border. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being bust all over the country. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being given privileges that even Americans don’t have ✅ The people had to see their hard earned dollars being robbed from them and given to people who came here illegally ✅ The people had to see them physically in their own cities, towns, and neighborhoods ✅ The people had to see a corrupt and treasonous judiciary system that would encourage criminal migrants to embed themselves within our country and sow chaos & crime Like it or not that is what the last four years were all about. And now you are seeing the results of the operation. Now you are seeing that public opinion, by CNN‘s own admission, is in Donald Trump‘s favor: “ no matter which way you cut it, the American public is with the Republicans, the American public is with Donald Trump to a much greater extent than they were in term number one. And it’s not just on the broad issue of immigration, it’s on the specifics as well, in which the American public is with Donald Trump and the Republicans. And that is why Donald Trump is eager to take on this fight.” 👉And that is why you are seeing the military begin to step in and clean up the mess. It is always been about manufacturing. The people‘s consent for those things which must be done. 🎥 Video Credit: @LatinosWithTrump

NewsTreason Channel 17

17,130 views • 1 year ago

Have you ever heard of EDM (electrical discharge machining)? 🤔 Watch as these metal parts get cut with a hair-thin copper wire and a high-frequency pulse generator with temperatures reaching tens of thousands of degrees… The metal is cut within a deionized solution to keep it cool while cutting. When they lower the pieces back together, they slide perfectly into each other with literally ZERO gap or visible cut marks! No material is lost like normal cutting, so the parts fit like they were never separated. How is this even real?! 👇

Have you ever heard of EDM (electrical discharge machining)? 🤔 Watch as these metal parts get cut with a hair-thin copper wire and a high-frequency pulse generator with temperatures reaching tens of thousands of degrees… The metal is cut within a deionized solution to keep it cool while cutting. When they lower the pieces back together, they slide perfectly into each other with literally ZERO gap or visible cut marks! No material is lost like normal cutting, so the parts fit like they were never separated. How is this even real?! 👇

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

33,843 views • 5 months ago

NEW GAS PUMP SCAM ALERT — They’re using a single screw to steal your money. Scammers wedge a small drywall screw into the nozzle holder at the pump. You pay, fill up, hang the nozzle… but it never fully resets. The next person (or the scammer) keeps pumping gas on YOUR card. Seen at multiple stations. Real. Simple. Effective. ✅ Always check the cradle before & after pumping ✅ Make sure the nozzle clicks fully in and screen resets to $0 ✅ Avoid “helpful” strangers offering to pump for you Share this. It takes 5 seconds to check and could save you a tank of gas. Has this screw-in-the-cradle gas pump scam been confirmed by law enforcement or multiple stations in your area?

NEW GAS PUMP SCAM ALERT — They’re using a single screw to steal your money. Scammers wedge a small drywall screw into the nozzle holder at the pump. You pay, fill up, hang the nozzle… but it never fully resets. The next person (or the scammer) keeps pumping gas on YOUR card. Seen at multiple stations. Real. Simple. Effective. ✅ Always check the cradle before & after pumping ✅ Make sure the nozzle clicks fully in and screen resets to $0 ✅ Avoid “helpful” strangers offering to pump for you Share this. It takes 5 seconds to check and could save you a tank of gas. Has this screw-in-the-cradle gas pump scam been confirmed by law enforcement or multiple stations in your area?

CeCe

6,729,592 views • 2 months ago

$Most robotics teams can make a robot move… very few can make it work every day in the real world! @roboforce_inc was just featured in Jensen Huang’s GTC keynote, not for a demo but for a robot they claim is already working in the field. Their system, TITAN, is built for industrial environments: ✅ 40 kg dual-arm payload ✅ millimeter-level precision ✅ 8 hours runtime ✅ early pilots in energy, logistics, and manufacturing They call it Physical AI: The focus is on getting robots to do the kind of labor that still depends on people: repetitive, risky, and physical. IMO, what stands out isn’t the specs. It’s the claim of 11,000 robot orders❗️ If even a fraction of that turns into real deployments, it would make RoboForce one of the most widely scaled robot platforms in the world!!?? The open question is whether this shift from prototype to production is real or just the next phase of robotics storytelling. It looks very promising to me. It’s also interesting how their founder openly pushes back against the humanoid trend, arguing for wheels over legs in real industrial settings. It’s an unusual perspective in a time when humanoids get most of the attention. If they are right, the next humanoid robotics wave might look less like a human and more like an industrial version. Seen at —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:$

Most robotics teams can make a robot move… very few can make it work every day in the real world! @roboforce_inc was just featured in Jensen Huang’s GTC keynote, not for a demo but for a robot they claim is already working in the field. Their system, TITAN, is built for industrial environments: ✅ 40 kg dual-arm payload ✅ millimeter-level precision ✅ 8 hours runtime ✅ early pilots in energy, logistics, and manufacturing They call it Physical AI: The focus is on getting robots to do the kind of labor that still depends on people: repetitive, risky, and physical. IMO, what stands out isn’t the specs. It’s the claim of 11,000 robot orders❗️ If even a fraction of that turns into real deployments, it would make RoboForce one of the most widely scaled robot platforms in the world!!?? The open question is whether this shift from prototype to production is real or just the next phase of robotics storytelling. It looks very promising to me. It’s also interesting how their founder openly pushes back against the humanoid trend, arguing for wheels over legs in real industrial settings. It’s an unusual perspective in a time when humanoids get most of the attention. If they are right, the next humanoid robotics wave might look less like a human and more like an industrial version. Seen at —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Ilir Aliu

27,741 views • 9 months ago

Most gripper are made to pick or grab just one type of object… often tool changing is the fastest and most efficient option. Gripper-cushion grips it all❗ Handles sheet metal, liquid tanks, nonwovens, and pipes: These gripper pads are revolutionizing material handling in manufacturing. ✅ Versatile: Capable of gripping diverse materials from sheet metal to pipes. ✅ Simplified Handling: Reduces the complexity of robotic programming. ✅ Self-Calibrating: Utilizes gravity for error-resistant gripping. ✅ No Special Design Needed: Eliminates the need for precise gripping points on components. Not something you see every day. Saw this at: —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Most gripper are made to pick or grab just one type of object… often tool changing is the fastest and most efficient option. Gripper-cushion grips it all❗ Handles sheet metal, liquid tanks, nonwovens, and pipes: These gripper pads are revolutionizing material handling in manufacturing. ✅ Versatile: Capable of gripping diverse materials from sheet metal to pipes. ✅ Simplified Handling: Reduces the complexity of robotic programming. ✅ Self-Calibrating: Utilizes gravity for error-resistant gripping. ✅ No Special Design Needed: Eliminates the need for precise gripping points on components. Not something you see every day. Saw this at: —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Ilir Aliu - eu/acc

37,033 views • 8 months ago

The truth about digital ID is that it is already here. The Brit Card is a distraction, a clever psyop to make people think they have stopped something, while the real system quietly embeds itself behind the scenes. When the time comes, will people stand up or bow down to the evil controllers? Because this is what it comes down to in the end. The system of total control is being built in plain sight, and many will take the mark willingly, believing it is for their safety or convenience. We all have to say no. No matter what the cost.

The truth about digital ID is that it is already here. The Brit Card is a distraction, a clever psyop to make people think they have stopped something, while the real system quietly embeds itself behind the scenes. When the time comes, will people stand up or bow down to the evil controllers? Because this is what it comes down to in the end. The system of total control is being built in plain sight, and many will take the mark willingly, believing it is for their safety or convenience. We all have to say no. No matter what the cost.

Doc Malik

72,310 views • 10 months ago

RAY DALIO Lays Out How DOGE Can Save America From a Debt Spiral: Ray Dalio has a three part plan: ✅ Cut HARD -- goal: get the annual deficit down to 3% of GDP -- this would mean cutting the projected 2025 deficit by more than half -- $900B+ in cuts to a ~$1.8T 2025 deficit gets us ~3% ✅ Cut FAST -- the faster you cut, the less you have to cut ✅ Own the number -- everyone in government should galvanize around this Dalio on the urgency to make cuts NOW: " Do it soon, when the economy's good." "In other words, do it now." "If you have a bad economy, you cannot do it." Dalio on bond and interest rate impacts: " The other thing about it is to realize that if you make those moves, the bond market will benefit." david friedberg: " If the federal government were to cut spending significantly and quickly, the market would naturally react to lower rates." As Elon Musk mentions in the clip below, cutting spending lowers inflation, which eventually lowers interest payments and makes bonds more attractive for investors. Friedberg on avoiding the arithmetic death spiral: " The longer we wait, the more you have to cut in the future to get out of the hole." "And ultimately, this is the arithmetic death spiral that you get into." "I think that is so important for any person in government listening: the faster you cut, the less you have to cut."

RAY DALIO Lays Out How DOGE Can Save America From a Debt Spiral: Ray Dalio has a three part plan: ✅ Cut HARD -- goal: get the annual deficit down to 3% of GDP -- this would mean cutting the projected 2025 deficit by more than half -- $900B+ in cuts to a ~$1.8T 2025 deficit gets us ~3% ✅ Cut FAST -- the faster you cut, the less you have to cut ✅ Own the number -- everyone in government should galvanize around this Dalio on the urgency to make cuts NOW: " Do it soon, when the economy's good." "In other words, do it now." "If you have a bad economy, you cannot do it." Dalio on bond and interest rate impacts: " The other thing about it is to realize that if you make those moves, the bond market will benefit." david friedberg: " If the federal government were to cut spending significantly and quickly, the market would naturally react to lower rates." As Elon Musk mentions in the clip below, cutting spending lowers inflation, which eventually lowers interest payments and makes bonds more attractive for investors. Friedberg on avoiding the arithmetic death spiral: " The longer we wait, the more you have to cut in the future to get out of the hole." "And ultimately, this is the arithmetic death spiral that you get into." "I think that is so important for any person in government listening: the faster you cut, the less you have to cut."

The All-In Podcast

91,101 views • 1 year ago

Teleoperation today relies on WebRTC. That works for Zoom. Not for robotics. Is that statement provocative? WebRTC works for video calls. But not really for robots. I’m teleoperating from SF → London using Adamo’s stack. Zero buffering. No lag smoothing… just real-time control. Because WebRTC apps add buffers to handle: • packet loss • network jitter That’s fine when you’re talking. Not so much when you’re controlling a robot. Even small delays kill precision. So instead of adapting WebRTC… Adamo built a custom protocol + dedicated global infrastructure. Without buffering or artificial delay. A stable, real-time connection across the Atlantic. This is what people underestimate about robotics: Models are just one piece of the puzzle. But looking at the entire stack, there is so much more. And Sometimes you can’t reuse what exists. You have to build it from the ground up. Thank you, Sam Considine for letting me try, it nice seeing you during GTC last week! 👋 ——- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Teleoperation today relies on WebRTC. That works for Zoom. Not for robotics. Is that statement provocative? WebRTC works for video calls. But not really for robots. I’m teleoperating from SF → London using Adamo’s stack. Zero buffering. No lag smoothing… just real-time control. Because WebRTC apps add buffers to handle: • packet loss • network jitter That’s fine when you’re talking. Not so much when you’re controlling a robot. Even small delays kill precision. So instead of adapting WebRTC… Adamo built a custom protocol + dedicated global infrastructure. Without buffering or artificial delay. A stable, real-time connection across the Atlantic. This is what people underestimate about robotics: Models are just one piece of the puzzle. But looking at the entire stack, there is so much more. And Sometimes you can’t reuse what exists. You have to build it from the ground up. Thank you, Sam Considine for letting me try, it nice seeing you during GTC last week! 👋 ——- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Ilir Aliu

21,319 views • 4 months ago

Richard Feynman, Nobel Prize-winning physicist: "You can know the name of every pattern in the market and understand nothing about why a single one works. I won a Nobel on that one distinction. it is the whole difference between an edge and a story you tell yourself." this free film is a Nobel laureate teaching you how to actually think, recorded by the BBC and free ever since. at the board it's simple. Feynman's obsession was the gap between naming a thing and understanding it. You can memorize the word for why a stock moved, "momentum", "mean reversion", and still know nothing about whether it will happen again. Real understanding means you can say why, from the mechanism up, and name what would break it. Everything else is a label pasted over ignorance. That's the whole "edge", minus the marketing. Feynman's rule was that the first principle is you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool. Same point as my casino piece above: the market is a machine for handing you convincing stories, and the only defense is refusing to believe one you cannot explain. the film is free and anyone can watch it tonight. what nobody can give you is the discipline to admit "I named it but I don't understand it" before you put money on it. That honesty is the edge, and it is the rarest thing there is.

Richard Feynman, Nobel Prize-winning physicist: "You can know the name of every pattern in the market and understand nothing about why a single one works. I won a Nobel on that one distinction. it is the whole difference between an edge and a story you tell yourself." this free film is a Nobel laureate teaching you how to actually think, recorded by the BBC and free ever since. at the board it's simple. Feynman's obsession was the gap between naming a thing and understanding it. You can memorize the word for why a stock moved, "momentum", "mean reversion", and still know nothing about whether it will happen again. Real understanding means you can say why, from the mechanism up, and name what would break it. Everything else is a label pasted over ignorance. That's the whole "edge", minus the marketing. Feynman's rule was that the first principle is you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool. Same point as my casino piece above: the market is a machine for handing you convincing stories, and the only defense is refusing to believe one you cannot explain. the film is free and anyone can watch it tonight. what nobody can give you is the discipline to admit "I named it but I don't understand it" before you put money on it. That honesty is the edge, and it is the rarest thing there is.

Rossst.03

20,025 views • 17 days ago

"We have a government that locks people up for tweets... You want to give them the ability to control your behaviour?" Konstantin Kisin warns that the UK government is using illegal immigration as an excuse to roll out mandatory digital ID—but the real objective is to build an "infrastructure of control" that could ultimately function as a Chinese-style social credit system. "The argument in favour of [digital IDs] is that... if you get all the information about people in one place, it does make it easier for government to do things. On the other hand, we have a government that locks people up for tweets, shuts you in your home because there's a bad flu going around, and thinks half the country is far right." "They're lying about what this is for. And this is the biggest red flag in all of this. They are claiming that this is about illegal immigration... The reason we have an illegal immigration problem is not that we can't identify them. It's that we're not removing them." Credit: Konstantin Kisin TRIGGERnometry

"We have a government that locks people up for tweets... You want to give them the ability to control your behaviour?" Konstantin Kisin warns that the UK government is using illegal immigration as an excuse to roll out mandatory digital ID—but the real objective is to build an "infrastructure of control" that could ultimately function as a Chinese-style social credit system. "The argument in favour of [digital IDs] is that... if you get all the information about people in one place, it does make it easier for government to do things. On the other hand, we have a government that locks people up for tweets, shuts you in your home because there's a bad flu going around, and thinks half the country is far right." "They're lying about what this is for. And this is the biggest red flag in all of this. They are claiming that this is about illegal immigration... The reason we have an illegal immigration problem is not that we can't identify them. It's that we're not removing them." Credit: Konstantin Kisin TRIGGERnometry

Wide Awake Media

45,126 views • 10 months ago

Zack Polanski, "The problem is chaining yourself to an economic system that is so fundamentally broken" "You don't get marks or points for just being good, a gold star for doing the basics, or even just under the necessary" "We are at this urgent moment in our history where the only thing that is acceptable is what is required" "What is required is to reduce our emissions, to invest in climate adaptation, to protect nature in one of the most nature depleted countries in the world" "And to make sure we're reinvigorating communities with the truth and putting them in charge" "What is the biggest tool we have?" "It is our shared humanity" "Tackling the cost of living crisis is the same solution as tackling the climate crisis" "It's so vital at this budget that we're cutting bills and taxing billionaires" "There's an implication that all of this is transactional, and the only thing people care about is the money in their pockets" "If you're struggling, that probably is the only thing you care about" "But for so many people, they care about the future of this planet. About clean air. Green spaces" "That when people go to work they have a shared sense of purpose, that it is meaningful and that they are contributing something to society" "We are in a crisis. Climate. Equality. Air pollution. Identity. All of these problems are all interlinked" "And it all comes down to our communities and our humanity"

Zack Polanski, "The problem is chaining yourself to an economic system that is so fundamentally broken" "You don't get marks or points for just being good, a gold star for doing the basics, or even just under the necessary" "We are at this urgent moment in our history where the only thing that is acceptable is what is required" "What is required is to reduce our emissions, to invest in climate adaptation, to protect nature in one of the most nature depleted countries in the world" "And to make sure we're reinvigorating communities with the truth and putting them in charge" "What is the biggest tool we have?" "It is our shared humanity" "Tackling the cost of living crisis is the same solution as tackling the climate crisis" "It's so vital at this budget that we're cutting bills and taxing billionaires" "There's an implication that all of this is transactional, and the only thing people care about is the money in their pockets" "If you're struggling, that probably is the only thing you care about" "But for so many people, they care about the future of this planet. About clean air. Green spaces" "That when people go to work they have a shared sense of purpose, that it is meaningful and that they are contributing something to society" "We are in a crisis. Climate. Equality. Air pollution. Identity. All of these problems are all interlinked" "And it all comes down to our communities and our humanity"

Farrukh

205,108 views • 8 months ago

A simple CNC machine. Wood. A rotating tool. And yet the pattern shifts from circles to perfect hexagons with a level of accuracy most factories still struggle to hit. I worked five years in manufacturing at Siemens, and this is the part people often overlook. The real magic is not new or loud. It is stability. Repeatability. Tool paths that were tuned forever. Precision that just keeps working. Robotics is in a hype cycle right now, but manufacturing has delivered quiet perfection long before anyone talked about foundation models. Sometimes the most interesting engineering is the part that does not ask for attention. —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

A simple CNC machine. Wood. A rotating tool. And yet the pattern shifts from circles to perfect hexagons with a level of accuracy most factories still struggle to hit. I worked five years in manufacturing at Siemens, and this is the part people often overlook. The real magic is not new or loud. It is stability. Repeatability. Tool paths that were tuned forever. Precision that just keeps working. Robotics is in a hype cycle right now, but manufacturing has delivered quiet perfection long before anyone talked about foundation models. Sometimes the most interesting engineering is the part that does not ask for attention. —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Ilir Aliu

164,829 views • 8 months ago

Alan Oppenheim, MIT professor: "Every trader alive uses a moving average. Almost none of them know it's a filter, and funds pay quants $600K for the version they were never taught." a moving average is a filter. it smooths a jumpy price to reveal the slower signal hiding underneath. that is all it is, and it is the bluntest one there is. the same math gives you filters that lag less and cut more noise, and that gap is a real edge. this is the second half of what Simons was doing. first you accept the market is a signal buried in noise. then you build the filter that reads it, and the moving average on your chart is the crudest possible version. Oppenheim builds the real ones at the board in this lecture. here is the catch. a filter only helps if there is a real signal under the noise. smooth pure randomness and you will see a beautiful trend that means nothing. the filter is free. knowing there is a real signal worth filtering is the edge.

Alan Oppenheim, MIT professor: "Every trader alive uses a moving average. Almost none of them know it's a filter, and funds pay quants $600K for the version they were never taught." a moving average is a filter. it smooths a jumpy price to reveal the slower signal hiding underneath. that is all it is, and it is the bluntest one there is. the same math gives you filters that lag less and cut more noise, and that gap is a real edge. this is the second half of what Simons was doing. first you accept the market is a signal buried in noise. then you build the filter that reads it, and the moving average on your chart is the crudest possible version. Oppenheim builds the real ones at the board in this lecture. here is the catch. a filter only helps if there is a real signal under the noise. smooth pure randomness and you will see a beautiful trend that means nothing. the filter is free. knowing there is a real signal worth filtering is the edge.

Rossst.03

214,907 views • 1 month ago

Marc Andreessen says raw intelligence might be the worst qualification for leadership — and it changes everything about how we should think about AI. "If the leader is more than one standard deviation of IQ away from the followers, it's a real problem." Andreessen points to the US military, one of the earliest and most rigorous adopters of IQ testing, as the source of this insight. They slot people into specialties and leadership roles based on IQ scores. And over the years, they kept seeing the same pattern. A leader who is significantly less intelligent than their people struggles to model how those people think. That part is intuitive. But the reverse turns out to be equally true. "It's actually very hard for very smart people to model the internal thought processes of even moderately smart people." A leader who is two standard deviations above the norm of the organisation they're running also loses theory of mind, that ability to hold an accurate model of what's happening inside someone else's head. The gap is too wide in both directions. Andreessen then takes this to its logical conclusion: "If you had a person or a machine that had a thousand IQ or something like it, its understanding of reality would be so alien to the people or the things that it was managing that it wouldn't even be able to connect in any sort of realistic way." An AI that vastly outthinks every human in the room isn't positioned to lead those humans. It's positioned to be completely incomprehensible to them. Leadership has never really been an intelligence problem. It's a connection problem. And no amount of raw intelligence closes that gap — past a certain point, it only widens it. The world will not be run by the smartest thing in the room for a long time. Maybe ever.

Marc Andreessen says raw intelligence might be the worst qualification for leadership — and it changes everything about how we should think about AI. "If the leader is more than one standard deviation of IQ away from the followers, it's a real problem." Andreessen points to the US military, one of the earliest and most rigorous adopters of IQ testing, as the source of this insight. They slot people into specialties and leadership roles based on IQ scores. And over the years, they kept seeing the same pattern. A leader who is significantly less intelligent than their people struggles to model how those people think. That part is intuitive. But the reverse turns out to be equally true. "It's actually very hard for very smart people to model the internal thought processes of even moderately smart people." A leader who is two standard deviations above the norm of the organisation they're running also loses theory of mind, that ability to hold an accurate model of what's happening inside someone else's head. The gap is too wide in both directions. Andreessen then takes this to its logical conclusion: "If you had a person or a machine that had a thousand IQ or something like it, its understanding of reality would be so alien to the people or the things that it was managing that it wouldn't even be able to connect in any sort of realistic way." An AI that vastly outthinks every human in the room isn't positioned to lead those humans. It's positioned to be completely incomprehensible to them. Leadership has never really been an intelligence problem. It's a connection problem. And no amount of raw intelligence closes that gap — past a certain point, it only widens it. The world will not be run by the smartest thing in the room for a long time. Maybe ever.

Big Brain AI

366,029 views • 4 months ago

Banks create money out of thin air. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is how the system works. You deposit a million dollars. The bank lends it to an entrepreneur. You think the bank now has zero. It has two million. Because when a bank issues a loan it creates new money on its balance sheet. This is the secret of alchemy. Turning lead into gold. Turning nothing into something. The only reason it works is because you believe it works. Money is not valuable because of gold. Not because of oil. Money is valuable because you cannot imagine a world without it. That is the trick. And the people running this trick have been running it for 800 years

Banks create money out of thin air. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is how the system works. You deposit a million dollars. The bank lends it to an entrepreneur. You think the bank now has zero. It has two million. Because when a bank issues a loan it creates new money on its balance sheet. This is the secret of alchemy. Turning lead into gold. Turning nothing into something. The only reason it works is because you believe it works. Money is not valuable because of gold. Not because of oil. Money is valuable because you cannot imagine a world without it. That is the trick. And the people running this trick have been running it for 800 years

Predictive History

12,280 views • 2 months ago

KYRALL TURNS "I NEED THIS PART" INTO SECONDS, WITHOUT OPENING CAD you describe the part. the AI generates it. no SolidWorks. no Fusion. no hours of setup. why this matters to you: modeling a part in CAD is slow and technical. sketch, constrain, extrude, fillet — for every bracket, housing or fixture. and simple one-off parts eat the same ceremony every time. for an engineer, that bottleneck stalls the whole project. Kyrall skips it: → prompt → 3D part ready → exports to STEP and STL, the formats you already use → for when you need the geometry now, not in three days it doesn't compete with CAD suites on millimeter control. it competes on getting you to a usable part first. idea → part → keep building. link below :)

KYRALL TURNS "I NEED THIS PART" INTO SECONDS, WITHOUT OPENING CAD you describe the part. the AI generates it. no SolidWorks. no Fusion. no hours of setup. why this matters to you: modeling a part in CAD is slow and technical. sketch, constrain, extrude, fillet — for every bracket, housing or fixture. and simple one-off parts eat the same ceremony every time. for an engineer, that bottleneck stalls the whole project. Kyrall skips it: → prompt → 3D part ready → exports to STEP and STL, the formats you already use → for when you need the geometry now, not in three days it doesn't compete with CAD suites on millimeter control. it competes on getting you to a usable part first. idea → part → keep building. link below :)

marcus

31,238 views • 1 month ago

There is a growing trend for this sandwich cutting hack. Many people are now claiming cutting a sandwich in a Y shape gives a better bite. I’ve never seen anyone do this but I’d be willing to give it a try. For me the only difference is the crust pieces aren’t that great. Would you try this and see if your sandwich taste better just with this style of cut?

There is a growing trend for this sandwich cutting hack. Many people are now claiming cutting a sandwich in a Y shape gives a better bite. I’ve never seen anyone do this but I’d be willing to give it a try. For me the only difference is the crust pieces aren’t that great. Would you try this and see if your sandwich taste better just with this style of cut?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

46,546 views • 3 months ago

OK SO FINALLY I have a means to show you what I have been saying for a while.......Watch this clip, share it, so people understand what we are saying here!!! In this Clip, JLR© is having a discussion with Watching the World , and we get to see that front door lock!! Here is what I have been saying.....The Front door is a material called EXPANDED METAL, YOU CAN SEE THROUGH IT. The Door IS a Security Door, that you would have to cut through with two locks. A Lock that can be unlocked via a key on the handle, and a DEADbolt lock that would be locked on the inside of the door. This PREVENTS someone from being able to attack you when you OPEN the HOUSE door that is inside it, and behind this screen door. That door only opens when that deadbolt is unlocked from inside! ALso notice we see NO damage to the door or frame in this video!!

OK SO FINALLY I have a means to show you what I have been saying for a while.......Watch this clip, share it, so people understand what we are saying here!!! In this Clip, JLR© is having a discussion with Watching the World , and we get to see that front door lock!! Here is what I have been saying.....The Front door is a material called EXPANDED METAL, YOU CAN SEE THROUGH IT. The Door IS a Security Door, that you would have to cut through with two locks. A Lock that can be unlocked via a key on the handle, and a DEADbolt lock that would be locked on the inside of the door. This PREVENTS someone from being able to attack you when you OPEN the HOUSE door that is inside it, and behind this screen door. That door only opens when that deadbolt is unlocked from inside! ALso notice we see NO damage to the door or frame in this video!!

Capt KEVman!!!

46,092 views • 5 months ago

John Ternus, Apple's incoming CEO, on the Steve Jobs story that shapes every product decision at Apple: Ternus recalls the moment in his own words: "I think you know one of my favorite stories... It was about Steve when he was moving a piece of furniture, a chest of drawers and pulled it away from the wall and looked at the back and was just reflecting on, you know, the carpenter had made it beautiful. It finished the back as beautifully as the rest of it, even though nobody was going to see it." For Ternus, the story is a working philosophy: "I think about that all the time because I think that perfectly exemplifies what we do here." He points to Apple's most affordable Mac as proof that this standard applies across the entire product line, not just the premium tier: "We've been talking about the MacBook Neo. I mean, here is our most affordable Mac we've ever made, and it's absolutely beautiful. And if you open it up and look inside, it's just as beautiful, right?" Ternus continues: "That's true on an iPhone Pro Max or a MacBook Pro or an iPad Pro, but it's also true on a MacBook Neo. That's what we do." The takeaway is a clear signal about the direction Apple is heading under his leadership: "It's just been really good to kind of think about that and reflect on that because that is probably the best kind of clue as to where we're going in the future is we're going to keep pushing in that same way." The lesson? Excellence isn't about what people see, it's about what you refuse to compromise on, even when no one's looking. That principle shaped Apple under Jobs and Cook, and it's the standard Ternus is committing to carry forward.

John Ternus, Apple's incoming CEO, on the Steve Jobs story that shapes every product decision at Apple: Ternus recalls the moment in his own words: "I think you know one of my favorite stories... It was about Steve when he was moving a piece of furniture, a chest of drawers and pulled it away from the wall and looked at the back and was just reflecting on, you know, the carpenter had made it beautiful. It finished the back as beautifully as the rest of it, even though nobody was going to see it." For Ternus, the story is a working philosophy: "I think about that all the time because I think that perfectly exemplifies what we do here." He points to Apple's most affordable Mac as proof that this standard applies across the entire product line, not just the premium tier: "We've been talking about the MacBook Neo. I mean, here is our most affordable Mac we've ever made, and it's absolutely beautiful. And if you open it up and look inside, it's just as beautiful, right?" Ternus continues: "That's true on an iPhone Pro Max or a MacBook Pro or an iPad Pro, but it's also true on a MacBook Neo. That's what we do." The takeaway is a clear signal about the direction Apple is heading under his leadership: "It's just been really good to kind of think about that and reflect on that because that is probably the best kind of clue as to where we're going in the future is we're going to keep pushing in that same way." The lesson? Excellence isn't about what people see, it's about what you refuse to compromise on, even when no one's looking. That principle shaped Apple under Jobs and Cook, and it's the standard Ternus is committing to carry forward.

Big Brain Business

164,871 views • 3 months ago