Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Amanda Anisimova on why she did not answer that question about playing under the American flag: "In my other press conference, the fact that I didn’t want to answer a question that was obviously intended for a headline and clickbait, that was my right. It had nothing to do... show more

The Tennis Letter

231,937 subscribers

668,241 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics Sports

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

BREAKING - EXPLOSIVE: Republican Congressman Jim Jordan (Rep. Jim Jordan) confronts Dr. Fauci on alleged COVID-19 cover-up and outright lies. WATCH Question: Thank you, Mister Chairman. Doctor, why was it so important that the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: We don't know where it started. And that's the reason why I keep an open mind. So I don't know what you mean by why was it so important. It wasn't important. Question: You still don't know where it started. The guys you gave money to figured out in three days. Answer: No, no, no. They said, Mister Anderson said on January 31, 2020, virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. The very next day, Doctor Gerry said, I don't know how this happens in nature. It'd be easy to do in a lab. And then three days later, Shazam, they switched and say it has to be nature. So they figured out in three days. But you still don't know. Answer: No. In fact, if you look at what they were saying, Congressman Jordan, they were saying that it was not a manufactured virus. It still could have evolved out of a lab. Question: Let me read something here to you. They're not incompatible. In our study on the censorship of the Biden administration working with big tech, I want to read you a WhatsApp message from Mark Zuckerberg. Can we include that? The White House put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory? Answer: Is there a question? Question: Here's another email to Mark Zuckerberg. It says, subject line COVID misinformation, Wuhan lab leak theory. Due to continued public pressure and tense conversations with the new administration, we started removing five COVID claims, including the lab leak theory. Mister Zuckerberg responds, this seems like a good reminder that when we compromise our standards due to pressure from an administration in either direction, we often later regret it. Why was it so important the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: It wasn't so important that the virus not. We don't know. Question: We know it was important to someone in the Biden administration. So much so that the top people at Meta, the top people at Facebook are asking, why are we getting all this pressure to downplay the lab leak theory? And we have an email from June of the same year, June 4, 2021, saying the same thing. It was certainly important to somebody. Answer: Well, what does that got to do with me? Question: I'm asking you because you're the expert on the coronavirus. I'm saying, why was the administration so pushing not to have the lab leak theory as something that was viable? Answer: I can answer that. I've kept an open mind throughout the entire time. Question: Doctor Fauci. Open mind. Answer: That is correct. Question: What happened in those three days? Why did Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry, why did they change their mind in 180 degrees? Because what Christian Andersen says three days later after he said virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory, three days later, he says the main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered. And that is demonstrably false. Question: How did they figure all that out in three days? Answer: Well, what they did is that, you know, they testified before this committee what they did. They went back and looked at the sequences and realized that their initial concern was unfounded about that. And it did not look at all like it was manufactured. Question: But in three days, they figured that out? Answer: Exactly. You could do that in three days. You can scan sequences in a day. You don't need three days. Question: Okay, who's Robert Redfield? Answer: The former director of the CDC. Question: Doctor Redfield. Right. And he was also in the coronavirus task force. Is that accurate? Answer: He was a member of the coronavirus task force. Question: Here's what he said to this committee. He said, Redfield said that Fauci and Collins left him out because Redfield suspected that coronavirus had leaked from the Chinese lab. Is that accurate? Answer: Well, he said that, but that's not true. That is incorrect. Question: Congressman, Doctor Redfield's lying to the committee? Answer: When he sat right where you sat when he said that I kept him out. That is an incorrect statement. Question: The roster who was on the phone, was Doctor Redfield in that conference call on February 1 when you had Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry on that call? Answer: He was not. And the conference call was put together by Jeremy Farrar. So no one kept him out. Question: He said he was kept out because did US tax dollars. Answer: You want me to answer the question? Question: Yeah. I would just wonder why it wasn't on the call. It seems to me the head of CDC, part of the coronavirus task force, which was formed two days prior to that call, would have been on the call. Answer: Well, the call was arranged by Jeremy Farrar. You should ask him. Question: Okay. Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: I'm sorry, what was? Question: Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: Yes, of course. It was a sub-award to the Wuhan Institute. Question: And who approved that award? Answer: Excuse me? Question: And who approved that award? Answer: What agency approved that award? Answer: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Question: Your agency approved that, right? Answer: Yes, it did. Question: Does that have anything to do with this downplaying of the lab leak theory? Answer: No, nothing to do with it. Question: Nothing. Do you agree that there was a push to downplay the lab leak theory? Answer: Not on my part. Question: Really? Really. Wow. Wow. I think most of the country find that amazing. Answer: I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Question: All right, I yield back.

BREAKING - EXPLOSIVE: Republican Congressman Jim Jordan (Rep. Jim Jordan) confronts Dr. Fauci on alleged COVID-19 cover-up and outright lies. WATCH Question: Thank you, Mister Chairman. Doctor, why was it so important that the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: We don't know where it started. And that's the reason why I keep an open mind. So I don't know what you mean by why was it so important. It wasn't important. Question: You still don't know where it started. The guys you gave money to figured out in three days. Answer: No, no, no. They said, Mister Anderson said on January 31, 2020, virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. The very next day, Doctor Gerry said, I don't know how this happens in nature. It'd be easy to do in a lab. And then three days later, Shazam, they switched and say it has to be nature. So they figured out in three days. But you still don't know. Answer: No. In fact, if you look at what they were saying, Congressman Jordan, they were saying that it was not a manufactured virus. It still could have evolved out of a lab. Question: Let me read something here to you. They're not incompatible. In our study on the censorship of the Biden administration working with big tech, I want to read you a WhatsApp message from Mark Zuckerberg. Can we include that? The White House put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory? Answer: Is there a question? Question: Here's another email to Mark Zuckerberg. It says, subject line COVID misinformation, Wuhan lab leak theory. Due to continued public pressure and tense conversations with the new administration, we started removing five COVID claims, including the lab leak theory. Mister Zuckerberg responds, this seems like a good reminder that when we compromise our standards due to pressure from an administration in either direction, we often later regret it. Why was it so important the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: It wasn't so important that the virus not. We don't know. Question: We know it was important to someone in the Biden administration. So much so that the top people at Meta, the top people at Facebook are asking, why are we getting all this pressure to downplay the lab leak theory? And we have an email from June of the same year, June 4, 2021, saying the same thing. It was certainly important to somebody. Answer: Well, what does that got to do with me? Question: I'm asking you because you're the expert on the coronavirus. I'm saying, why was the administration so pushing not to have the lab leak theory as something that was viable? Answer: I can answer that. I've kept an open mind throughout the entire time. Question: Doctor Fauci. Open mind. Answer: That is correct. Question: What happened in those three days? Why did Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry, why did they change their mind in 180 degrees? Because what Christian Andersen says three days later after he said virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory, three days later, he says the main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered. And that is demonstrably false. Question: How did they figure all that out in three days? Answer: Well, what they did is that, you know, they testified before this committee what they did. They went back and looked at the sequences and realized that their initial concern was unfounded about that. And it did not look at all like it was manufactured. Question: But in three days, they figured that out? Answer: Exactly. You could do that in three days. You can scan sequences in a day. You don't need three days. Question: Okay, who's Robert Redfield? Answer: The former director of the CDC. Question: Doctor Redfield. Right. And he was also in the coronavirus task force. Is that accurate? Answer: He was a member of the coronavirus task force. Question: Here's what he said to this committee. He said, Redfield said that Fauci and Collins left him out because Redfield suspected that coronavirus had leaked from the Chinese lab. Is that accurate? Answer: Well, he said that, but that's not true. That is incorrect. Question: Congressman, Doctor Redfield's lying to the committee? Answer: When he sat right where you sat when he said that I kept him out. That is an incorrect statement. Question: The roster who was on the phone, was Doctor Redfield in that conference call on February 1 when you had Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry on that call? Answer: He was not. And the conference call was put together by Jeremy Farrar. So no one kept him out. Question: He said he was kept out because did US tax dollars. Answer: You want me to answer the question? Question: Yeah. I would just wonder why it wasn't on the call. It seems to me the head of CDC, part of the coronavirus task force, which was formed two days prior to that call, would have been on the call. Answer: Well, the call was arranged by Jeremy Farrar. You should ask him. Question: Okay. Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: I'm sorry, what was? Question: Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: Yes, of course. It was a sub-award to the Wuhan Institute. Question: And who approved that award? Answer: Excuse me? Question: And who approved that award? Answer: What agency approved that award? Answer: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Question: Your agency approved that, right? Answer: Yes, it did. Question: Does that have anything to do with this downplaying of the lab leak theory? Answer: No, nothing to do with it. Question: Nothing. Do you agree that there was a push to downplay the lab leak theory? Answer: Not on my part. Question: Really? Really. Wow. Wow. I think most of the country find that amazing. Answer: I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Question: All right, I yield back.

Simon Ateba

997,322 views • 2 years ago

Coco Gauff was asked if smashing her racquet after her loss to Svitolina helps her move on “Is there part of you that thinks it’s healthy to just smash that racquet and get that loss over and done with? Does it help you move on?” Coco: “Yeah, definitely. I think for me, I know myself. I don’t want to lash out on my team. They’re good people. They don’t deserve that. I know I’m emotional. I just took the minute to go and do that. I don’t think it’s a bad thing. I don’t try to do it on court in front of kids and things like that. But I do know I need to let out that emotion.. otherwise I’m just gonna be snappy with the people around me. I don’t want to do that. Like I said they don’t deserve it. They did their best. I did mine. Just need to let the frustration out.” (via Australian Open Press)

Coco Gauff was asked if smashing her racquet after her loss to Svitolina helps her move on “Is there part of you that thinks it’s healthy to just smash that racquet and get that loss over and done with? Does it help you move on?” Coco: “Yeah, definitely. I think for me, I know myself. I don’t want to lash out on my team. They’re good people. They don’t deserve that. I know I’m emotional. I just took the minute to go and do that. I don’t think it’s a bad thing. I don’t try to do it on court in front of kids and things like that. But I do know I need to let out that emotion.. otherwise I’m just gonna be snappy with the people around me. I don’t want to do that. Like I said they don’t deserve it. They did their best. I did mine. Just need to let the frustration out.” (via Australian Open Press)

The Tennis Letter

1,331,693 views • 6 months ago

Maine candidate Platner today on his Nazi tattoo he had before this campaign: “I’m not going to apologize for something that like I didn’t know about or do. The moment that it was clear and I was putting it in that context I had it covered, because I don’t want that on my body.”

Maine candidate Platner today on his Nazi tattoo he had before this campaign: “I’m not going to apologize for something that like I didn’t know about or do. The moment that it was clear and I was putting it in that context I had it covered, because I don’t want that on my body.”

Edward-Isaac Dovere

294,028 views • 5 months ago

G-Dragon opens up about the 2023 drug controversy: “I didn’t want to hold a press conference and ramble on about my position, it was painful, and when I thought of it as just a process, the fact that I had to endure it felt suffocating, I started wondering if making a comeback was really the right thing to do, maybe I should rest more or even retire and just live as a regular person, but honestly I didn’t think there was any real reason to do that, I thought I should just be grateful that it all passed, but I kept thinking if it really passed or if I just forced my way out of it, that thought stayed with me for a few months, the only thing I could really turn to was music, around that time I had already started preparing for the album, and as I wrote based on everything I’d experienced, I ended up choosing POWER as the first track, it felt like a song that said I’ve found my owner.”

G-Dragon opens up about the 2023 drug controversy: “I didn’t want to hold a press conference and ramble on about my position, it was painful, and when I thought of it as just a process, the fact that I had to endure it felt suffocating, I started wondering if making a comeback was really the right thing to do, maybe I should rest more or even retire and just live as a regular person, but honestly I didn’t think there was any real reason to do that, I thought I should just be grateful that it all passed, but I kept thinking if it really passed or if I just forced my way out of it, that thought stayed with me for a few months, the only thing I could really turn to was music, around that time I had already started preparing for the album, and as I wrote based on everything I’d experienced, I ended up choosing POWER as the first track, it felt like a song that said I’ve found my owner.”

ْ

133,198 views • 9 months ago

#MilkPansa #mimiv About the “couple necklaces” 💚: I need to clarify first that it’s actually not my necklace. I didn’t buy it after Nong did. At that time, i went to SK with my older sister. She was going to get a facial treatment, and she was worried the necklace might get dirty. Also, she didn’t want to put it in her bag cuz she was afraid it might get lost, so she put it on me instead. 💚: I didn’t really think much about it. I just went to wait for her at the mart and was eating boiled eggs, like you guys saw. And honestly, i didn’t even know if the necklace was expensive or not. So i just turned the pendant to the back cuz i was worried it might get dirty. Also, since it’s not mine, i didn’t dare take it off myself, i was afraid i might break it. So i just want to say that it’s not my necklace; it actually belongs to my older sister.

#MilkPansa #mimiv About the “couple necklaces” 💚: I need to clarify first that it’s actually not my necklace. I didn’t buy it after Nong did. At that time, i went to SK with my older sister. She was going to get a facial treatment, and she was worried the necklace might get dirty. Also, she didn’t want to put it in her bag cuz she was afraid it might get lost, so she put it on me instead. 💚: I didn’t really think much about it. I just went to wait for her at the mart and was eating boiled eggs, like you guys saw. And honestly, i didn’t even know if the necklace was expensive or not. So i just turned the pendant to the back cuz i was worried it might get dirty. Also, since it’s not mine, i didn’t dare take it off myself, i was afraid i might break it. So i just want to say that it’s not my necklace; it actually belongs to my older sister.

sᴀᴘᴘʜᴏʀɪᴀ 💫

60,775 views • 4 months ago

Why am I not surprised that Mayor Brandon Johnson didn’t answer the question? He rambled on about racism & slavery & socialist programs that don’t work but refused to answer the question. Mayor Johnson, why is it that 1 out 4 students in Chicago cannot read or do math proficiently?

Why am I not surprised that Mayor Brandon Johnson didn’t answer the question? He rambled on about racism & slavery & socialist programs that don’t work but refused to answer the question. Mayor Johnson, why is it that 1 out 4 students in Chicago cannot read or do math proficiently?

Libs Of Chicago

68,723 views • 1 year ago

The withdrawal of my security has been repeatedly used to infringe on my right to voice my political views. Whenever they are unpalatable to the powers that be, withdrawing my security is the first political measure. My answer to Arnab on this question:

The withdrawal of my security has been repeatedly used to infringe on my right to voice my political views. Whenever they are unpalatable to the powers that be, withdrawing my security is the first political measure. My answer to Arnab on this question:

Junaid Azim Mattu

15,344 views • 5 months ago

#SudikshaKonanki | #JoshuaRiibe was interrogated again. I have translated the interrogation for y’all. Sudiksha Konanki: Joshua Riibe Evades Key Questions with the Same Answer Eight Times Punta Cana. – Joshua Steven Riibe, the last person to see the young Sudiksha Konanki, was interviewed by the Public Ministry, and in at least eight occasions, he stated that he could not answer a question, following the advice of his lawyers. Sudiksha Konanki disappeared on the 6th of this month at the beach. She was a guest at the RIU República hotel in Punta Cana. Throughout the interview, not always consecutively, here are the eight questions he refused to answer, according to a document with his statements obtained exclusively by Noticias SIN: can we verify that everything you have said corresponds to the truth? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 2.Could you tell us what you commented to your friend Carter Joseph when he asked about the missing girl, Sudiksha Konanki? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 3.What do you think about Sudiksha’s disappearance? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 4.Did Sudiksha know how to swim or not? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” you remember if Sudiksha made any gesture or screamed while she was in the sea? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 6.Did you inform the authorities or the hotel about what happened with you and the girl on the beach? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 7.Did you tell your friend what happened with you and the girl on the beach? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” do you feel about this situation? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.”

#SudikshaKonanki | #JoshuaRiibe was interrogated again. I have translated the interrogation for y’all. Sudiksha Konanki: Joshua Riibe Evades Key Questions with the Same Answer Eight Times Punta Cana. – Joshua Steven Riibe, the last person to see the young Sudiksha Konanki, was interviewed by the Public Ministry, and in at least eight occasions, he stated that he could not answer a question, following the advice of his lawyers. Sudiksha Konanki disappeared on the 6th of this month at the beach. She was a guest at the RIU República hotel in Punta Cana. Throughout the interview, not always consecutively, here are the eight questions he refused to answer, according to a document with his statements obtained exclusively by Noticias SIN: can we verify that everything you have said corresponds to the truth? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 2.Could you tell us what you commented to your friend Carter Joseph when he asked about the missing girl, Sudiksha Konanki? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 3.What do you think about Sudiksha’s disappearance? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 4.Did Sudiksha know how to swim or not? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” you remember if Sudiksha made any gesture or screamed while she was in the sea? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 6.Did you inform the authorities or the hotel about what happened with you and the girl on the beach? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” 7.Did you tell your friend what happened with you and the girl on the beach? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.” do you feel about this situation? “My lawyers advised me not to answer that question, and I am following their advice.”

𝕏 🕵🏻‍♀️🦋L̤̮E̤̮G̤̮🅰️C̤̮Y̤̮🦋🕵🏻‍♀️ 𝕏

104,132 views • 1 year ago

Amanda Anisimova was asked if players need more privacy from the behind the scenes cameras at the Australian Open “Yesterday Coco was talking about how players need a bit more privacy from the behind the scenes cameras. I’m wondering your thoughts? Whether you think it’s a bit intrusive and after a defeat like a day, how do you feel when you’re going backstage? Are you kind of conscious that they’re there? Maybe trying to hide emotions perhaps? Amanda: “You kind of know after a few days or 4 or 5 days that obviously you see on the internet you walking around. I knew that was there so I just kept my head down and went to the locker room. There are good moments obviously that people see, and that’s fun. When you lose there are probably not so good moments. I think the fact that the video of Coco that was posted, it’s tough because she didn’t have a say in that. But I think this deep down into the tournament I knew I didn’t have much privacy, so I just went to the locker room. I knew I was able to just be there, so…” (via Australian Open Press)

Amanda Anisimova was asked if players need more privacy from the behind the scenes cameras at the Australian Open “Yesterday Coco was talking about how players need a bit more privacy from the behind the scenes cameras. I’m wondering your thoughts? Whether you think it’s a bit intrusive and after a defeat like a day, how do you feel when you’re going backstage? Are you kind of conscious that they’re there? Maybe trying to hide emotions perhaps? Amanda: “You kind of know after a few days or 4 or 5 days that obviously you see on the internet you walking around. I knew that was there so I just kept my head down and went to the locker room. There are good moments obviously that people see, and that’s fun. When you lose there are probably not so good moments. I think the fact that the video of Coco that was posted, it’s tough because she didn’t have a say in that. But I think this deep down into the tournament I knew I didn’t have much privacy, so I just went to the locker room. I knew I was able to just be there, so…” (via Australian Open Press)

The Tennis Letter

368,636 views • 6 months ago

Mamdani: I do not believe that is the question you must, in fact, answer in that booth. In the city I know, in the city I love, the question is not, “When did you arrive?” The question is, “Can you afford to stay?”

Mamdani: I do not believe that is the question you must, in fact, answer in that booth. In the city I know, in the city I love, the question is not, “When did you arrive?” The question is, “Can you afford to stay?”

Acyn

118,156 views • 1 month ago

I love that in this she explains that it’s just the connections that Mseleku brought for her. But that company she opened is hers. And she alone registered in it. Not him. Mseleku takes credit for the fact that it was his idea or suggestion for her to open the company. To the point where he says she and her family would be nothing had he not brought that idea up? Such a disgusting man #UthandoNesthembu #uthandonesthembu

I love that in this she explains that it’s just the connections that Mseleku brought for her. But that company she opened is hers. And she alone registered in it. Not him. Mseleku takes credit for the fact that it was his idea or suggestion for her to open the company. To the point where he says she and her family would be nothing had he not brought that idea up? Such a disgusting man #UthandoNesthembu #uthandonesthembu

zeek

66,371 views • 4 months ago

Phillip to Jennings: When you answer my question with a question, you are dodging. Answer the question. It is very telling that you are not able to entertain an answer.

Phillip to Jennings: When you answer my question with a question, you are dodging. Answer the question. It is very telling that you are not able to entertain an answer.

Acyn

162,856 views • 1 year ago

Iga Swiatek on why she started her foundation: “Since I started earning big money, I honestly was kind of confused.. happy obviously, but confused in a way that it wasn’t like that always. It’s not like we always had money for me to continue. I know what kind of trouble young athletes can face. I just wanted to use my resources both financially and in terms of the experience of my team to help them maybe go over some obstacles.” ❤️ (via Australian Open Press)

Iga Swiatek on why she started her foundation: “Since I started earning big money, I honestly was kind of confused.. happy obviously, but confused in a way that it wasn’t like that always. It’s not like we always had money for me to continue. I know what kind of trouble young athletes can face. I just wanted to use my resources both financially and in terms of the experience of my team to help them maybe go over some obstacles.” ❤️ (via Australian Open Press)

The Tennis Letter

149,951 views • 6 months ago

Kyle Shanahan was asked if it was the fact they had to go to Australia for Week 1 or that it was the Rams who asked the league to play the 49ers, that he wasn’t happy about: “Both, but more of that than the other. We only get 3 close fights, whether it’s Seattle, Arizona or LA, so to get one of those taken away is tough. Especially when it’s 19 hours away on an airplane. That’s not like a small flight. So that adds up and I love our fans taking over SoFi. That’s awesome and I get why the Rams don’t want that.” 🎥: Tom Tolbert

Kyle Shanahan was asked if it was the fact they had to go to Australia for Week 1 or that it was the Rams who asked the league to play the 49ers, that he wasn’t happy about: “Both, but more of that than the other. We only get 3 close fights, whether it’s Seattle, Arizona or LA, so to get one of those taken away is tough. Especially when it’s 19 hours away on an airplane. That’s not like a small flight. So that adds up and I love our fans taking over SoFi. That’s awesome and I get why the Rams don’t want that.” 🎥: Tom Tolbert

Coach Yac 🗣

139,644 views • 2 months ago

Gabbard: My answer yesterday was based on my recollection or the lack thereof, on the details that were posted there I was not. And the what was shared today reflects the fact that I was not directly involved with that part of the signal chat

Gabbard: My answer yesterday was based on my recollection or the lack thereof, on the details that were posted there I was not. And the what was shared today reflects the fact that I was not directly involved with that part of the signal chat

Acyn

2,074,493 views • 1 year ago

.Kaitlan Collins on Trump attacking her: It's really not about me. I think it's more effective to remind people when he is insulting me or criticizing me, about the question I asked or the reporting that I did that he was so angry about. The fact that I got an award for it really bothered him, clearly. In those moments it's important to put the reminder back on the work, on the question, and on the non-answers that we get.

.Kaitlan Collins on Trump attacking her: It's really not about me. I think it's more effective to remind people when he is insulting me or criticizing me, about the question I asked or the reporting that I did that he was so angry about. The fact that I got an award for it really bothered him, clearly. In those moments it's important to put the reminder back on the work, on the question, and on the non-answers that we get.

Headquarters

105,984 views • 14 days ago

Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade: “Are you thinking about taking Khartg Island where 90% of the Iranian oil goes through?” President Trump: “Yeah, but, Brian, I can’t answer a question like that. And you shouldn’t ask it. You shouldn’t even be asking it. It’s one of so many different things. It’s not high on the list, but it’s one of so many different things. And I can change my mind in seconds, but, you know, for you to ask the question — who would answer a question like that? You’re asking me a question. Kharg Island. Who would ask a question like that and what fool would answer it? Let’s say I was gonna do it or I wasn’t gonna do it, what would I tell you? ‘Oh, yes, Brian, I’m thinking about doing it. Let me let you know what time and when it will take place.’ It’s not — you know, it’s sort of a foolish question. A little surprising for you because you’re a smart man.”

Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade: “Are you thinking about taking Khartg Island where 90% of the Iranian oil goes through?” President Trump: “Yeah, but, Brian, I can’t answer a question like that. And you shouldn’t ask it. You shouldn’t even be asking it. It’s one of so many different things. It’s not high on the list, but it’s one of so many different things. And I can change my mind in seconds, but, you know, for you to ask the question — who would answer a question like that? You’re asking me a question. Kharg Island. Who would ask a question like that and what fool would answer it? Let’s say I was gonna do it or I wasn’t gonna do it, what would I tell you? ‘Oh, yes, Brian, I’m thinking about doing it. Let me let you know what time and when it will take place.’ It’s not — you know, it’s sort of a foolish question. A little surprising for you because you’re a smart man.”

RedWave Press

730,069 views • 5 months ago

Crockett: I know that facts hurt you all, and I wish we could get on the same page, but we do know that during the presidential election, Trump would not go and participate in anything if fact-checking was involved because he didn’t want to be fact-checked. We know that Vance got upset during the debate when he was fact-checked. There used to be a time in this country where we as elected officials thought that it was okay to just tell the truth.

Crockett: I know that facts hurt you all, and I wish we could get on the same page, but we do know that during the presidential election, Trump would not go and participate in anything if fact-checking was involved because he didn’t want to be fact-checked. We know that Vance got upset during the debate when he was fact-checked. There used to be a time in this country where we as elected officials thought that it was okay to just tell the truth.

Acyn

1,135,419 views • 1 year ago