正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

😲Amazon Customer Out $2,000 After Two Empty Watch Boxes Delivered😲 Eric Lapworth ordered a premium smart watch from Amazon. The first box arrived completely empty. Amazon sent a replacement, but the second box was also empty. Amazon customer support agents repeatedly hung up on him or left the chat... show more

American Crime Stories

32,152 subscribers

461,017 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治健康养生

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

If you're an Amazon India customer, take 2 mins to read this if your money is dear to you. TLDR version, Amazon delivery partners are literally scamming customers. And Amazon India will do nothing to help you in this situation. Kiss your money goodbye! I raised this concern on social media a few days back, for a product (Levi's jeans) which was marked as delivered but I never received it. Their customer support team, did some investigation and came to the conclusion that the product was indeed delivered. Hence, they cannot do anything more to assist me in this situation (refer image) This was not a OTP based delivery, and neither does Amazon mention the name of the person who received the product on their app/website. If it was OTP based delivery, I would know someone has given the OTP so delivery has happened. With a name, at least I would know if there's any person with that name in the house. Now, I have absolutely no way to confirm if Amazon genuinely delivered the product. Except video camera evidence. So I went to see the CCTV footage of the day and time the product was marked as delivered. In the CCTV footage, I see something very strange. The Amazon delivery partner arrives at my place, gets off the bike, takes out the product and for the next couple of mins just keeps doing something on his phone. He doesn't call me, or at least I don't have any call record of calls at that time. In the meanwhile, another person walking out closes the door. That person is not me, neither works for me and neither known to me. Likely associated with a neighbour/tenant and I have no such instructions for my Amazon account for deliveries to be left with anyone else. One minute later the Amazon delivery partner decides to leave (see screenshot). The delivery partner doesn't even enter the house and just leaves after a couple of mins. Without even entering the house, Amazon successfully delivered the product! Wow! And if the delivery partner handed the product to any random person walking out of the house, is that the customer's problem? Was this a very expensive product? No, not at all. So why am I spending all this time to write this? 1. I just want to spread awareness to everyone out there who might be getting scammed by such malpractices from Amazon / delivery partners. 2. If Amazon claims a product is delivered, you can't do nothing about it. Irrespective of whether the product was actually delivered or not. Your money is gone, poof! 3. It should be the company's responsibility to prove that a product was successfully delivered but in India it seems anyone can walk over their customers. 4. I'm shocked that a customer has to go to these lengths to uncover such scams in India 5. If ordering on Amazon, I will always select cash on delivery as the default going forward Amazon India - Do not contact me in hope that I will delete this tweet or evidence now! PS: Video doesn't have the date/time stamp as aspect ratio has been cropped. Will only share that with company officials if someone from Amazon wants to see it. Or with consumer courts if I decide to pursue this further, definitely not worth my time for now. But in the US, I would have definitely filed a lawsuit for millions.

If you're an Amazon India customer, take 2 mins to read this if your money is dear to you. TLDR version, Amazon delivery partners are literally scamming customers. And Amazon India will do nothing to help you in this situation. Kiss your money goodbye! I raised this concern on social media a few days back, for a product (Levi's jeans) which was marked as delivered but I never received it. Their customer support team, did some investigation and came to the conclusion that the product was indeed delivered. Hence, they cannot do anything more to assist me in this situation (refer image) This was not a OTP based delivery, and neither does Amazon mention the name of the person who received the product on their app/website. If it was OTP based delivery, I would know someone has given the OTP so delivery has happened. With a name, at least I would know if there's any person with that name in the house. Now, I have absolutely no way to confirm if Amazon genuinely delivered the product. Except video camera evidence. So I went to see the CCTV footage of the day and time the product was marked as delivered. In the CCTV footage, I see something very strange. The Amazon delivery partner arrives at my place, gets off the bike, takes out the product and for the next couple of mins just keeps doing something on his phone. He doesn't call me, or at least I don't have any call record of calls at that time. In the meanwhile, another person walking out closes the door. That person is not me, neither works for me and neither known to me. Likely associated with a neighbour/tenant and I have no such instructions for my Amazon account for deliveries to be left with anyone else. One minute later the Amazon delivery partner decides to leave (see screenshot). The delivery partner doesn't even enter the house and just leaves after a couple of mins. Without even entering the house, Amazon successfully delivered the product! Wow! And if the delivery partner handed the product to any random person walking out of the house, is that the customer's problem? Was this a very expensive product? No, not at all. So why am I spending all this time to write this? 1. I just want to spread awareness to everyone out there who might be getting scammed by such malpractices from Amazon / delivery partners. 2. If Amazon claims a product is delivered, you can't do nothing about it. Irrespective of whether the product was actually delivered or not. Your money is gone, poof! 3. It should be the company's responsibility to prove that a product was successfully delivered but in India it seems anyone can walk over their customers. 4. I'm shocked that a customer has to go to these lengths to uncover such scams in India 5. If ordering on Amazon, I will always select cash on delivery as the default going forward Amazon India - Do not contact me in hope that I will delete this tweet or evidence now! PS: Video doesn't have the date/time stamp as aspect ratio has been cropped. Will only share that with company officials if someone from Amazon wants to see it. Or with consumer courts if I decide to pursue this further, definitely not worth my time for now. But in the US, I would have definitely filed a lawsuit for millions.

Gurjot Ahluwalia

12,416 次观看 • 9 个月前

Amazon just got caught running a secret price manipulation operation with Levi's, Home Depot, Walmart, and many more. Every time you "comparison shopped" online, you were looking at prices that were already rigged. Here's what happened: Amazon would monitor prices on Walmart, Target, Best Buy, Home Depot, and Chewy in real time. The second a competitor listed a product cheaper than Amazon, they'd contact the brand directly and tell them to "fix it." And the exact emails are now PUBLIC. Amazon sent Levi's links to two Walmart listings with the subject line "styles of concern." They basically said the prices on Walmart are too low and we have a problem. The next day, Levi's responded: "I talked to Walmart and they have partnered with us to take Easy Khaki Classic fit back up to ladder SPP price, $29.99 immediately." Levi's literally called Walmart and told them to raise the price. Because Amazon told Levi's to make the call. Walmart complied. Then Amazon matched the HIGHER price. Both retailers ended up charging more. The customer paid extra. Nobody competed. Same playbook with Hanes: Amazon sent them links showing Target and Walmart prices were lower. Hanes confirmed they "reached out to Target and Walmart to have the prices increased." Target increased the prices. Walmart increased the prices. Amazon kept their margins. But it gets even worse... Amazon told Allergan (the company that makes eye drops) that their product was "suppressed" on Amazon because it was cheaper on another site. Allergan responded: "Walmart got their price back up to $16.99." Amazon then unsuppressed the listing. They did this with pet treats on Chewy. Furniture on Home Depot. Products across dozens of categories spanning YEARS. The mechanism is simple but terrifying: If you're a brand and you sell cheaper on Walmart than on Amazon, Amazon suppresses your product, removes you from the Buy Box, buries you in search results, and effectively makes you invisible to 300 million customers. Brands can't afford that. So they call Walmart and Target and say "raise your prices or we'll lose our Amazon listings." Walmart and Target comply because they need the brand's products. Amazon captures 40 cents of every dollar spent online in America. That gives them the leverage to set prices across THE ENTIRE internet. Not just their own platform. So turns out, you were never comparison shopping. You were looking at a coordinated price floor set by Amazon through backroom phone calls between brands and their competitors. "Amazon is working to make your life more unaffordable." 3 separate antitrust trials are now scheduled for 2027. The FTC has its own case. 18 states plus the DOJ are piling on. This is literally happening during the WORST affordability crisis in a generation. Groceries up 25% since 2020. Housing unaffordable. Wages flat. And the largest ecommerce company on Earth has been secretly coordinating with brands to make sure you can't find a cheaper price ANYWHERE. "Competition" in retail is just a fantasy.

Ricardo

2,921,940 次观看 • 2 个月前

Amazon just got caught running a secret price manipulation operation with Levi's, Home Depot, Walmart, and many more. Every time you "comparison shopped" online, you were looking at prices that were already rigged. Here's what happened: Amazon would monitor prices on Walmart, Target, Best Buy, Home Depot, and Chewy in real time. The second a competitor listed a product cheaper than Amazon, they'd contact the brand directly and tell them to "fix it." And the exact emails are now PUBLIC. Amazon sent Levi's links to two Walmart listings with the subject line "styles of concern." They basically said the prices on Walmart are too low and we have a problem. The next day, Levi's responded: "I talked to Walmart and they have partnered with us to take Easy Khaki Classic fit back up to ladder SPP price, $29.99 immediately." Levi's literally called Walmart and told them to raise the price. Because Amazon told Levi's to make the call. Walmart complied. Then Amazon matched the HIGHER price. Both retailers ended up charging more. The customer paid extra. Nobody competed. Same playbook with Hanes: Amazon sent them links showing Target and Walmart prices were lower. Hanes confirmed they "reached out to Target and Walmart to have the prices increased." Target increased the prices. Walmart increased the prices. Amazon kept their margins. But it gets even worse... Amazon told Allergan (the company that makes eye drops) that their product was "suppressed" on Amazon because it was cheaper on another site. Allergan responded: "Walmart got their price back up to $16.99." Amazon then unsuppressed the listing. They did this with pet treats on Chewy. Furniture on Home Depot. Products across dozens of categories spanning YEARS. The mechanism is simple but terrifying: If you're a brand and you sell cheaper on Walmart than on Amazon, Amazon suppresses your product, removes you from the Buy Box, buries you in search results, and effectively makes you invisible to 300 million customers. Brands can't afford that. So they call Walmart and Target and say "raise your prices or we'll lose our Amazon listings." Walmart and Target comply because they need the brand's products. Amazon captures 40 cents of every dollar spent online in America. That gives them the leverage to set prices across THE ENTIRE internet. Not just their own platform. So turns out, you were never comparison shopping. You were looking at a coordinated price floor set by Amazon through backroom phone calls between brands and their competitors. "Amazon is working to make your life more unaffordable." 3 separate antitrust trials are now scheduled for 2027. The FTC has its own case. 18 states plus the DOJ are piling on. This is literally happening during the WORST affordability crisis in a generation. Groceries up 25% since 2020. Housing unaffordable. Wages flat. And the largest ecommerce company on Earth has been secretly coordinating with brands to make sure you can't find a cheaper price ANYWHERE. "Competition" in retail is just a fantasy.

redpillbot

50,691 次观看 • 2 个月前

Masters of the Universe film opened to a global $54.1M, combining a $29.4M US weekend with $24.7M from 85 international markets including a strong $4.5M from Brazil with a $170M production budget. It may be a Box Office flop BUT Amazon views theatrical releases primarily as a tool for cultural relevance rather than funding the company, so they will be happy if the film drives subscription and/or watch hours to Prime Video. PREORDER’s for the 4K Blu-ray is the #1 seller in movies & TV on Amazon, Critic and audience reviews have been overwhelmingly positive, and the merchandise is selling out. Amazon MGM’s Kevin Wilson is pushing back on negative buzz surrounding the box office numbers for Masters of the Universe Wilson called the opening a "very solid start," highlighting a "passionate, multigenerational audience response" and a massive 96% "definite recommend" from kids under 12 in PostTrak polls Jared Leto’s Skeletor was so good and will be an instant meme for all the right reasons. Maybe the best villain in yearssss Will the film have a second life? #MastersOfTheUniverse

Masters of the Universe film opened to a global $54.1M, combining a $29.4M US weekend with $24.7M from 85 international markets including a strong $4.5M from Brazil with a $170M production budget. It may be a Box Office flop BUT Amazon views theatrical releases primarily as a tool for cultural relevance rather than funding the company, so they will be happy if the film drives subscription and/or watch hours to Prime Video. PREORDER’s for the 4K Blu-ray is the #1 seller in movies & TV on Amazon, Critic and audience reviews have been overwhelmingly positive, and the merchandise is selling out. Amazon MGM’s Kevin Wilson is pushing back on negative buzz surrounding the box office numbers for Masters of the Universe Wilson called the opening a "very solid start," highlighting a "passionate, multigenerational audience response" and a massive 96% "definite recommend" from kids under 12 in PostTrak polls Jared Leto’s Skeletor was so good and will be an instant meme for all the right reasons. Maybe the best villain in yearssss Will the film have a second life? #MastersOfTheUniverse

MoviesThatMaher

20,593 次观看 • 1 个月前

Love seeing this heartfelt note about our Delivery Service Partner, Ronald Dubon and team... — Sometimes, the smallest hearts remind the biggest companies what kindness truly looks like. When a four-year-old boy dreamed of having an Amazon-themed birthday party—complete with the thrill of seeing a real delivery van—no one could have imagined that Amazon itself would make that dream come true. Despite being one of the largest and busiest companies in the world, Amazon found the time, heart, and humanity to show up in a deeply personal way. On short notice, they didn’t just send one delivery van—they brought two: a classic Amazon delivery van and a cutting-edge electric model. Their team arrived with smiles, good spirits, and arms full of gifts, turning a simple backyard celebration into a once-in-a-lifetime memory. Every child got to climb behind the wheel, honk the horn, and pretend to be an Amazon driver for a day. The laughter, joy, and awe on their faces said everything words could not. In a world where large corporations often feel distant, Amazon proved that compassion and community still matter. Their thoughtful gesture—done not for publicity, but from genuine goodwill—brought magic to a young boy’s birthday and touched every heart in attendance. It was a powerful reminder that even the biggest companies are made up of people who care, and their unexpected generosity should never go unnoticed. Thank you, Amazon, for showing that behind every box and logo lies a company capable of incredible kindness.

Andy Jassy

23,024 次观看 • 9 个月前

EXCLUSIVE: Illegal Immigrant Hauling Amazon Trailer Causes Crash In Georgia Two years ago, a 20-year-old woman was hit by a massive truck hauling an Amazon trailer while driving down an interstate in Jefferson, Georgia. She recently contacted the Daily Wire after learning that illegal immigrant truckers were causing major crashes across the country. She believed she may have been hit by one. The man who hit her spoke some broken English, but kept making phone calls in a foreign language while local police asked him for info, according to police body camera footage we obtained. Turns out, she was right. The truck driver, Uzbek national Jakhongir Yuldashev, crossed the border illegally into Yuma, Arizona, just two years before the crash, according to immigration records we obtained. He was later released from federal custody after posting his immigration bond, a federal law enforcement source said. Yuldashev received a trucking license in Pennsylvania, allowing him to move Amazon packages and freight across the country, according to police records. Trucking experts say it shows just how “widespread” the issue of illegal immigrants driving trucks is in the labor market. It's also not the first time an illegal has been caught up in a crash while hauling for Amazon. In fact, in March an illegal immigrant from Eritrea, allegedly killed five people, including a child and an infant, while hauling an Amazon load through Austin, Texas.

EXCLUSIVE: Illegal Immigrant Hauling Amazon Trailer Causes Crash In Georgia Two years ago, a 20-year-old woman was hit by a massive truck hauling an Amazon trailer while driving down an interstate in Jefferson, Georgia. She recently contacted the Daily Wire after learning that illegal immigrant truckers were causing major crashes across the country. She believed she may have been hit by one. The man who hit her spoke some broken English, but kept making phone calls in a foreign language while local police asked him for info, according to police body camera footage we obtained. Turns out, she was right. The truck driver, Uzbek national Jakhongir Yuldashev, crossed the border illegally into Yuma, Arizona, just two years before the crash, according to immigration records we obtained. He was later released from federal custody after posting his immigration bond, a federal law enforcement source said. Yuldashev received a trucking license in Pennsylvania, allowing him to move Amazon packages and freight across the country, according to police records. Trucking experts say it shows just how “widespread” the issue of illegal immigrants driving trucks is in the labor market. It's also not the first time an illegal has been caught up in a crash while hauling for Amazon. In fact, in March an illegal immigrant from Eritrea, allegedly killed five people, including a child and an infant, while hauling an Amazon load through Austin, Texas.

Jennie Taer

39,624 次观看 • 5 个月前

Lard ass bakery bandit steals HALF a cake maker’s entire stock from her honesty-box shed without leaving a single penny Sabina Seidel, 39, from Spalding, Lincolnshire, opened her dream Treat Street Bake Shed in March 2026 using a simple honesty system with a QR code for card payments and a cash box. On 9 May, between 7:25pm and 8pm, a pony-tailed man in a red T-shirt calmly walked in, filled a plastic bag with 25 home-made cakes and cookies worth around £80, licked his lips, tried the cash box, and strolled out. Sabina, watching on her hidden CCTV, initially thought he was a customer paying and even thanked him as he left. She only realised the theft when she saw the open door and empty shelves. Lincolnshire Police are investigating and have confirmed no arrests have been made..yet

Lard ass bakery bandit steals HALF a cake maker’s entire stock from her honesty-box shed without leaving a single penny Sabina Seidel, 39, from Spalding, Lincolnshire, opened her dream Treat Street Bake Shed in March 2026 using a simple honesty system with a QR code for card payments and a cash box. On 9 May, between 7:25pm and 8pm, a pony-tailed man in a red T-shirt calmly walked in, filled a plastic bag with 25 home-made cakes and cookies worth around £80, licked his lips, tried the cash box, and strolled out. Sabina, watching on her hidden CCTV, initially thought he was a customer paying and even thanked him as he left. She only realised the theft when she saw the open door and empty shelves. Lincolnshire Police are investigating and have confirmed no arrests have been made..yet

G R I F T Y

405,803 次观看 • 1 个月前

This regular ASOS shopper orders three sweaters online, excited for her haul. The package arrives visibly damaged—taped back together from transit mishandling—but still sealed. No red flags yet. She opens it... and finds only ONE sweater inside. The other two she paid for? Completely missing. She contacts customer support to report the issue and request the missing items (or a refund/reship). Just 30 minutes later, she gets this email bombshell: "After reviewing your request, we are going to ban you for life as a customer. You can no longer shop at ASOS." No refund mentioned, no explanation—just permanent ban. This is sounds like more terrible customer service in 2026—package arrives short, you report it honestly, and instead of fixing it, they accuse you of fraud (or whatever flagged their system) and nuke your account for life. ASOS has a rep for cracking down on "suspicious" activity like frequent returns or claims, but banning someone over a one-time missing-items report from a damaged box? That feels like overkill. Is she the problem here, or is ASOS punishing honest customers for their own fulfillment screw-ups?

This regular ASOS shopper orders three sweaters online, excited for her haul. The package arrives visibly damaged—taped back together from transit mishandling—but still sealed. No red flags yet. She opens it... and finds only ONE sweater inside. The other two she paid for? Completely missing. She contacts customer support to report the issue and request the missing items (or a refund/reship). Just 30 minutes later, she gets this email bombshell: "After reviewing your request, we are going to ban you for life as a customer. You can no longer shop at ASOS." No refund mentioned, no explanation—just permanent ban. This is sounds like more terrible customer service in 2026—package arrives short, you report it honestly, and instead of fixing it, they accuse you of fraud (or whatever flagged their system) and nuke your account for life. ASOS has a rep for cracking down on "suspicious" activity like frequent returns or claims, but banning someone over a one-time missing-items report from a damaged box? That feels like overkill. Is she the problem here, or is ASOS punishing honest customers for their own fulfillment screw-ups?

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

31,675 次观看 • 3 个月前

Male karen loses his mind because he does not want to be on camera. A peaceful filming session in a public space quickly escalated into a physical altercation, a threat of pepper spray, and a lesson in First Amendment rights outside a BJ's Restaurant & Brewhouse in Anaheim Hills, California. The incident began while a journalist was recording video outside the restaurant's outdoor patio area. A customer dining on the patio took issue with being filmed. Instead of ignoring the camera or asking the creator to move along, the customer escalated the situation by stepping around the patio partition to directly confront the cameraman. The interaction instantly turned physical as the customer attempted to grab the recording equipment. Seeing the journalists being targeted, on of his partners jumped in to intervene, physically pushing the customer back. To prevent further advancement from the customer or surrounding patrons, the partner brandished pepper spray, loudly warning the crowd to back up or face being sprayed. Restaurant employees and nearby diners stepped in to separate everyone before the violence could escalate further. When the Anaheim Police Department arrived on the scene, they were met with two very different approaches from officers. The first officer wanted to treat the journalist like they were the problem and not the victim as he demanded ID out of the gate without even seeing the evidence. When he sergeant arrived things moved in the right direction as he respected the rights of the journalists as the complaint was taken. After talking to the sergeant the journalist decided to shift gears. Expressing that his primary goal was to educate the public on constitutional rights rather than see someone hauled off to jail, the journalist offered a compromise. He stated he would forgo pressing charges if the customer agreed to a formal, face-to-face apology. The police sergeant stepped in to facilitate, and the customer ultimately apologized to the journalist directly on camera. With the apology accepted, the journalist declined to pursue the matter further, and officers concluded the investigation with zero arrests.

Male karen loses his mind because he does not want to be on camera. A peaceful filming session in a public space quickly escalated into a physical altercation, a threat of pepper spray, and a lesson in First Amendment rights outside a BJ's Restaurant & Brewhouse in Anaheim Hills, California. The incident began while a journalist was recording video outside the restaurant's outdoor patio area. A customer dining on the patio took issue with being filmed. Instead of ignoring the camera or asking the creator to move along, the customer escalated the situation by stepping around the patio partition to directly confront the cameraman. The interaction instantly turned physical as the customer attempted to grab the recording equipment. Seeing the journalists being targeted, on of his partners jumped in to intervene, physically pushing the customer back. To prevent further advancement from the customer or surrounding patrons, the partner brandished pepper spray, loudly warning the crowd to back up or face being sprayed. Restaurant employees and nearby diners stepped in to separate everyone before the violence could escalate further. When the Anaheim Police Department arrived on the scene, they were met with two very different approaches from officers. The first officer wanted to treat the journalist like they were the problem and not the victim as he demanded ID out of the gate without even seeing the evidence. When he sergeant arrived things moved in the right direction as he respected the rights of the journalists as the complaint was taken. After talking to the sergeant the journalist decided to shift gears. Expressing that his primary goal was to educate the public on constitutional rights rather than see someone hauled off to jail, the journalist offered a compromise. He stated he would forgo pressing charges if the customer agreed to a formal, face-to-face apology. The police sergeant stepped in to facilitate, and the customer ultimately apologized to the journalist directly on camera. With the apology accepted, the journalist declined to pursue the matter further, and officers concluded the investigation with zero arrests.

Giggling Ganon

30,585 次观看 • 1 个月前

BAD CRY HAVOC REVIEWS If you would like to counter any of these, I sure would appreciate it. You don’t even have to purchase the book from Amazon. You can check it out from your local library or borrow from a friend and still leave a review if you would like to support. A one star a second after the book dropped - must be a speed reader :) Nowhere on Amazon does it say there are signed books or the tiger stripe publication boxes I put together and send out as ‘thank yous.’ If one is looking for signed books - contact any of the bookstores on my Book Tour and they would be happy to send you one. Barnes & Nobel has signed editions on their site as well - just type “CRY HAVOC signed” in their search bar. A sincere THANK YOU to everyone who has picked up CRY HAVOC week one and taken the time to leave a positive review! Really does mean the world to me and I am eternally grateful 🙏 A few more stops on the CRY HAVOC Book Tour! See you soon! Let’s go!

BAD CRY HAVOC REVIEWS If you would like to counter any of these, I sure would appreciate it. You don’t even have to purchase the book from Amazon. You can check it out from your local library or borrow from a friend and still leave a review if you would like to support. A one star a second after the book dropped - must be a speed reader :) Nowhere on Amazon does it say there are signed books or the tiger stripe publication boxes I put together and send out as ‘thank yous.’ If one is looking for signed books - contact any of the bookstores on my Book Tour and they would be happy to send you one. Barnes & Nobel has signed editions on their site as well - just type “CRY HAVOC signed” in their search bar. A sincere THANK YOU to everyone who has picked up CRY HAVOC week one and taken the time to leave a positive review! Really does mean the world to me and I am eternally grateful 🙏 A few more stops on the CRY HAVOC Book Tour! See you soon! Let’s go!

Jack Carr

35,270 次观看 • 9 个月前

Jeff Bezos on how to build a business strategy “I very frequently get the question: ‘What’s going to change in the next 10 years?” And that is an interesting question… But I almost never get the question: ‘What’s not going to change in the next 10 years?’ And I submit to you that that second question is actually the more important of the two.” Jeff argues: “You can build a business strategy around the things that are stable in time. In our retail business, we know that customers want low prices, and I know that’s going to be true 10 years from now. They want fast delivery. They want vast selection. It’s impossible to imagine a future 10 years from now where a customer comes up and says, ‘Jeff I love Amazon, I just wish the prices were a little higher.’ Or, ‘I love Amazon, I just wish you’d deliver a little slower.’ Impossible. And so we know the energy we put into these things today will still be paying dividends for our customers 10 years from now.” He gives AWS as another example. It’s impossible to imagine AWS customers asking for a less reliable or more expensive service. ”When you have something that you know is true, even over the long term, you can afford to put a lot of energy into it… The big ideas in business are often very obvious, but it’s very hard to maintain a firm grasp of the obvious at all times. But if you can do that and continue to spin up those flywheels and put energy into those things, over time, you build a better service for your customers on the things that genuinely matter to them.” Video source: Amazon Web Services (2012)

Jeff Bezos on how to build a business strategy “I very frequently get the question: ‘What’s going to change in the next 10 years?” And that is an interesting question… But I almost never get the question: ‘What’s not going to change in the next 10 years?’ And I submit to you that that second question is actually the more important of the two.” Jeff argues: “You can build a business strategy around the things that are stable in time. In our retail business, we know that customers want low prices, and I know that’s going to be true 10 years from now. They want fast delivery. They want vast selection. It’s impossible to imagine a future 10 years from now where a customer comes up and says, ‘Jeff I love Amazon, I just wish the prices were a little higher.’ Or, ‘I love Amazon, I just wish you’d deliver a little slower.’ Impossible. And so we know the energy we put into these things today will still be paying dividends for our customers 10 years from now.” He gives AWS as another example. It’s impossible to imagine AWS customers asking for a less reliable or more expensive service. ”When you have something that you know is true, even over the long term, you can afford to put a lot of energy into it… The big ideas in business are often very obvious, but it’s very hard to maintain a firm grasp of the obvious at all times. But if you can do that and continue to spin up those flywheels and put energy into those things, over time, you build a better service for your customers on the things that genuinely matter to them.” Video source: Amazon Web Services (2012)

Startup Archive

22,420 次观看 • 3 个月前

Jeff Bezos on how to build a business strategy “I very frequently get the question: ‘What’s going to change in the next 10 years?” And that is an interesting question… But I almost never get the question: ‘What’s not going to change in the next 10 years?’ And I submit to you that that second question is actually the more important of the two.” Jeff argues: “You can build a business strategy around the things that are stable in time. In our retail business, we know that customers want low prices, and I know that’s going to be true 10 years from now. They want fast delivery. They want vast selection. It’s impossible to imagine a future 10 years from now where a customer comes up and says, ‘Jeff I love Amazon, I just wish the prices were a little higher.’ Or, ‘I love Amazon, I just wish you’d deliver a little slower.’ Impossible. And so we know the energy we put into these things today will still be paying dividends for our customers 10 years from now.” He gives AWS as another example. It’s impossible to imagine AWS customers asking for a less reliable or more expensive service. ”When you have something that you know is true, even over the long term, you can afford to put a lot of energy into it… The big ideas in business are often very obvious, but it’s very hard to maintain a firm grasp of the obvious at all times. But if you can do that and continue to spin up those flywheels and put energy into those things, over time, you build a better service for your customers on the things that genuinely matter to them.” Video source: Amazon Web Services (2012)

Jeff Bezos on how to build a business strategy “I very frequently get the question: ‘What’s going to change in the next 10 years?” And that is an interesting question… But I almost never get the question: ‘What’s not going to change in the next 10 years?’ And I submit to you that that second question is actually the more important of the two.” Jeff argues: “You can build a business strategy around the things that are stable in time. In our retail business, we know that customers want low prices, and I know that’s going to be true 10 years from now. They want fast delivery. They want vast selection. It’s impossible to imagine a future 10 years from now where a customer comes up and says, ‘Jeff I love Amazon, I just wish the prices were a little higher.’ Or, ‘I love Amazon, I just wish you’d deliver a little slower.’ Impossible. And so we know the energy we put into these things today will still be paying dividends for our customers 10 years from now.” He gives AWS as another example. It’s impossible to imagine AWS customers asking for a less reliable or more expensive service. ”When you have something that you know is true, even over the long term, you can afford to put a lot of energy into it… The big ideas in business are often very obvious, but it’s very hard to maintain a firm grasp of the obvious at all times. But if you can do that and continue to spin up those flywheels and put energy into those things, over time, you build a better service for your customers on the things that genuinely matter to them.” Video source: Amazon Web Services (2012)

Startup Archive

61,775 次观看 • 1 年前

JUST IN: The truck driver charged in a deadly I-35 crash in Austin that k*lled five and injured 11 had his bond reduced to $1,000 per charge Solomun Weldekeal-Araya, 37, still faces seven felony DWI charges The charges came after sobriety and drug recognition tests by Austin police Toxicology report later showed no alcohol or drugs in his system His lawyer later requested the court to reduce his bond to $1 per charge and have him released from jail He was originally held on $200,000 each for six intoxication mansl*ughter charges and $100,000 for an intoxication assault charge His bond conditions include GPS monitoring, ignition interlock, and no commercial driving He was hauling an Amazon load during the crash Amazon says he was not their employee but worked for a contracted carrier There are currently four active lawsuits related to this case on behalf of those k*lled and injured

JUST IN: The truck driver charged in a deadly I-35 crash in Austin that klled five and injured 11 had his bond reduced to $1,000 per charge Solomun Weldekeal-Araya, 37, still faces seven felony DWI charges The charges came after sobriety and drug recognition tests by Austin police Toxicology report later showed no alcohol or drugs in his system His lawyer later requested the court to reduce his bond to $1 per charge and have him released from jail He was originally held on $200,000 each for six intoxication manslughter charges and $100,000 for an intoxication assault charge His bond conditions include GPS monitoring, ignition interlock, and no commercial driving He was hauling an Amazon load during the crash Amazon says he was not their employee but worked for a contracted carrier There are currently four active lawsuits related to this case on behalf of those k*lled and injured

Unlimited L's

395,683 次观看 • 1 年前

Evans Kibet is the Kenyan athlete who managed to escape from the Russians after they sent him to the front lines in Ukraine. He came to Russia for an African culture festival, where he was offered a job. He agreed to sign a contract written in an unfamiliar language – which turned out to be an enlistment contract with the Russian Armed Forces. When Evans realized what he had gotten himself into, it was already too late. He was told: “Fight or be killed”. Watch his story on our YouTube:

Evans Kibet is the Kenyan athlete who managed to escape from the Russians after they sent him to the front lines in Ukraine. He came to Russia for an African culture festival, where he was offered a job. He agreed to sign a contract written in an unfamiliar language – which turned out to be an enlistment contract with the Russian Armed Forces. When Evans realized what he had gotten himself into, it was already too late. He was told: “Fight or be killed”. Watch his story on our YouTube:

Проект «Хочу жить»

14,762 次观看 • 7 个月前

NEW: Woman launches lawsuit after giving birth to a black baby that wasn’t hers thanks to an IVF mixup. Georgia woman Krystena Murray is suing a fertility clinic after carrying another couples baby through birth. Murray didn’t find out about the mixup until she gave birth to a baby that was a completely different skin complexion than her. “The birth of my child was supposed to be the happiest moment of my life, and honestly, it was. But it was also the scariest moment of my life,” Murray said. “All of the love and joy I felt seeing him for the first time was immediately replaced by fear. How could this have happened?” Murray gave up custody of the child after five months to the biological parents. The woman hoped it was just a sp*rm mixup but DNA testing proved the baby had no relation to her. “I walked in a mom with a child and a baby who loved me and was mine and was attached to me, and I walked out of the building with an empty stroller, and they left with my son,” she said after giving the baby up.

NEW: Woman launches lawsuit after giving birth to a black baby that wasn’t hers thanks to an IVF mixup. Georgia woman Krystena Murray is suing a fertility clinic after carrying another couples baby through birth. Murray didn’t find out about the mixup until she gave birth to a baby that was a completely different skin complexion than her. “The birth of my child was supposed to be the happiest moment of my life, and honestly, it was. But it was also the scariest moment of my life,” Murray said. “All of the love and joy I felt seeing him for the first time was immediately replaced by fear. How could this have happened?” Murray gave up custody of the child after five months to the biological parents. The woman hoped it was just a sp*rm mixup but DNA testing proved the baby had no relation to her. “I walked in a mom with a child and a baby who loved me and was mine and was attached to me, and I walked out of the building with an empty stroller, and they left with my son,” she said after giving the baby up.

Collin Rugg

6,942,313 次观看 • 1 年前

Lady publicly cries out for help over her brother who has been missing for the past three weeks in Enugu, alleging that despite reaching out to the company he worked for, she has received no tangible feedback. According to her, her brother worked as a security guard with St. Christopher Security Agency in Enugu and had been missing since the 7th of this month. She said she traveled from Abuja to Enugu to meet the company, where she was told that they had reported the case to the police two days after he went missing, on the 9th. She explained that the police requested his photograph, which she immediately sent to the company. However, when she personally visited the police station to make a report, officers allegedly told her that the company never returned with the picture they requested and had not been actively following up on the case. She also claimed that after the police made an arrest, the statement from the person arrested was completely different from the information she was initially given.

Lady publicly cries out for help over her brother who has been missing for the past three weeks in Enugu, alleging that despite reaching out to the company he worked for, she has received no tangible feedback. According to her, her brother worked as a security guard with St. Christopher Security Agency in Enugu and had been missing since the 7th of this month. She said she traveled from Abuja to Enugu to meet the company, where she was told that they had reported the case to the police two days after he went missing, on the 9th. She explained that the police requested his photograph, which she immediately sent to the company. However, when she personally visited the police station to make a report, officers allegedly told her that the company never returned with the picture they requested and had not been actively following up on the case. She also claimed that after the police made an arrest, the statement from the person arrested was completely different from the information she was initially given.

CHUKS 🍥

71,185 次观看 • 2 个月前

#WATCH | Delhi | Platform-based workers associated with companies such as Swiggy, Zomato, Zepto and Amazon are on a nationwide strike today under the banner of the Indian Federation of App-Based Transport Workers (IFAT). A food delivery agent says, "Initially, the rate card was fine, but now they have changed it, causing difficulties and problems for all the riders. We don't even get insurance claims. A rider recently had an accident at Barakhamba, and he didn't receive any claim... Our team leader and senior company officials told him to create a PDF, which they would send to Bangalore... There was no response from there. We all chipped in Rs 1000-2000 to help that rider. Now that guy is working even at night, taking orders at 1 or 2 AM... The TL never answers the phone. After 20 or 25 calls, the TL answers with an attitude. And if you argue with him even a little, he blocks your ID... After working 14 hours, we're only getting Rs 700-800... Today, there's a strike all over Delhi."

#WATCH | Delhi | Platform-based workers associated with companies such as Swiggy, Zomato, Zepto and Amazon are on a nationwide strike today under the banner of the Indian Federation of App-Based Transport Workers (IFAT). A food delivery agent says, "Initially, the rate card was fine, but now they have changed it, causing difficulties and problems for all the riders. We don't even get insurance claims. A rider recently had an accident at Barakhamba, and he didn't receive any claim... Our team leader and senior company officials told him to create a PDF, which they would send to Bangalore... There was no response from there. We all chipped in Rs 1000-2000 to help that rider. Now that guy is working even at night, taking orders at 1 or 2 AM... The TL never answers the phone. After 20 or 25 calls, the TL answers with an attitude. And if you argue with him even a little, he blocks your ID... After working 14 hours, we're only getting Rs 700-800... Today, there's a strike all over Delhi."

ANI

40,464 次观看 • 6 个月前

Palestinian migrant Ali Sharif, 33, who arrived in Britain from Palestine nearly two decades ago, has been jailed for three years and four months after a brazen Rolex robbery in upscale Mayfair. CCTV captures the moment Sharif and accomplice Mohamed Benioua, 30, approached wealthy victim Dimitrios Triadis outside the Mister Nice restaurant. They asked him for a light, then Benioua ripped the £18,000 Rolex straight off his wrist while Sharif distracted the victim’s female companion and tried to trip him to help the getaway. Judge Martin Griffith noted Sharif’s immigration status had prevented him from getting legal work, leaving him reliant on the black market. The watch was later recovered after Benioua was arrested with it strapped around his ankle. Sharif was also linked to a separate phone snatch on Oxford Street weeks later. Another example of the organised “Rolex ripper” tactics hitting London’s streets from immigrants

Palestinian migrant Ali Sharif, 33, who arrived in Britain from Palestine nearly two decades ago, has been jailed for three years and four months after a brazen Rolex robbery in upscale Mayfair. CCTV captures the moment Sharif and accomplice Mohamed Benioua, 30, approached wealthy victim Dimitrios Triadis outside the Mister Nice restaurant. They asked him for a light, then Benioua ripped the £18,000 Rolex straight off his wrist while Sharif distracted the victim’s female companion and tried to trip him to help the getaway. Judge Martin Griffith noted Sharif’s immigration status had prevented him from getting legal work, leaving him reliant on the black market. The watch was later recovered after Benioua was arrested with it strapped around his ankle. Sharif was also linked to a separate phone snatch on Oxford Street weeks later. Another example of the organised “Rolex ripper” tactics hitting London’s streets from immigrants

G R I F T Y

94,588 次观看 • 1 个月前

Jeff Bezos in 1999 on why "Internet Shminternet" doesn't matter: Jeff was being challenged on whether Amazon is still an internet company. They had 3,000 employees and over 4 million square feet of distribution centers. The interviewer pushes back: "You're not really a pure Internet company anymore either. You've got millions of square feet of real estate, growing inventory, thousands of employees." Jeff's response: "I'm very proud of that because with that distribution center space and half a dozen distribution centers around the country, it allows us to get product close to customers so we can ship it in a timely way which improves customer service levels. That's what we're about." The interviewer tries again: "But you're not a pure Internet play." Jeff fires back: "It doesn't matter to me whether we're a pure Internet play. What matters to me is we provide the best customer service. Internet Shminternet. That doesn't matter." On what investors should care about: "They should be investing in a company that obsesses over customer experience in the long term. There is never any misalignment between customer interests and shareholder interests." The interviewer accuses him of corporate arrogance: "Isn't it corporate arrogance to assume that you can come into these businesses which you have no experience in and virtually overnight become the best and the market leader?" Jeff's response: "When we first started selling books four years ago, everybody said 'you're just computer guys, you don't know anything about selling books.' And that was true. But we really cared about customers and now we know a lot about books. We hired the right people. We take the commitment to the customer very seriously." On the risk: "There's no guarantee that Amazon(.com) can be a successful company. What we're trying to do is very complicated. There's huge execution risk involved. We have a terribly complicated business. But this is the less risky of the two approaches because scale is important in this business." Customer obsession beats everything else.

Jeff Bezos in 1999 on why "Internet Shminternet" doesn't matter: Jeff was being challenged on whether Amazon is still an internet company. They had 3,000 employees and over 4 million square feet of distribution centers. The interviewer pushes back: "You're not really a pure Internet company anymore either. You've got millions of square feet of real estate, growing inventory, thousands of employees." Jeff's response: "I'm very proud of that because with that distribution center space and half a dozen distribution centers around the country, it allows us to get product close to customers so we can ship it in a timely way which improves customer service levels. That's what we're about." The interviewer tries again: "But you're not a pure Internet play." Jeff fires back: "It doesn't matter to me whether we're a pure Internet play. What matters to me is we provide the best customer service. Internet Shminternet. That doesn't matter." On what investors should care about: "They should be investing in a company that obsesses over customer experience in the long term. There is never any misalignment between customer interests and shareholder interests." The interviewer accuses him of corporate arrogance: "Isn't it corporate arrogance to assume that you can come into these businesses which you have no experience in and virtually overnight become the best and the market leader?" Jeff's response: "When we first started selling books four years ago, everybody said 'you're just computer guys, you don't know anything about selling books.' And that was true. But we really cared about customers and now we know a lot about books. We hired the right people. We take the commitment to the customer very seriously." On the risk: "There's no guarantee that Amazon(.com) can be a successful company. What we're trying to do is very complicated. There's huge execution risk involved. We have a terribly complicated business. But this is the less risky of the two approaches because scale is important in this business." Customer obsession beats everything else.

Jaynit

28,602 次观看 • 5 个月前

Matt Damon says Taxi Driver would’ve been clicked off on Netflix before it became a classic "The bar for walking out of a movie theater is a lot higher than from just changing the channel" "my friend Terry Kenny told me about the experience of seeing Taxi Driver in New York for the first time, he got up out of his seat... but he couldn't bring himself to leave because he was so invested" "he was standing at the back by the door watching the movie... and there were two other people standing next to him who were doing the same thing" "because the movie was disturbing them so much... which is not a bad thing" "had that been on Netflix or Amazon... somebody's like, oh I'm disturbed, and they turn and change the channel"

Matt Damon says Taxi Driver would’ve been clicked off on Netflix before it became a classic "The bar for walking out of a movie theater is a lot higher than from just changing the channel" "my friend Terry Kenny told me about the experience of seeing Taxi Driver in New York for the first time, he got up out of his seat... but he couldn't bring himself to leave because he was so invested" "he was standing at the back by the door watching the movie... and there were two other people standing next to him who were doing the same thing" "because the movie was disturbing them so much... which is not a bad thing" "had that been on Netflix or Amazon... somebody's like, oh I'm disturbed, and they turn and change the channel"

Yonan

623,635 次观看 • 1 个月前