正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Ambedkar was never accepted as a Buddhist and was rejected by Buddhist Dharma gurus. He was not able to take the three vows of Buddhism. Later, he started his own concept of Neo-Buddhism, which has no acceptance within the traditional Buddhist religion. Shankaracharya ji is awaring Hindus of Neo... show more

Shubham Sharma

82,220 subscribers

51,660 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

艺术新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Hindu girl married a Buddhist man thinking, "Buddhism is part of Sanatan Dharma" After marriage, she was Beaten and Forced to Convert to Buddhism. Her husband threw out Hindu idols, forcing her to worship Buddha Buddhism teaches, Hindus are Icchantika (Unbeliever to be Killed)

Hindu girl married a Buddhist man thinking, "Buddhism is part of Sanatan Dharma" After marriage, she was Beaten and Forced to Convert to Buddhism. Her husband threw out Hindu idols, forcing her to worship Buddha Buddhism teaches, Hindus are Icchantika (Unbeliever to be Killed)

mihirkul hunraja (backup)

176,234 次观看 • 8 个月前

"Hindus face a greater threat from Neo Buddhists than Islam", Shankaracharya ji after giving me the Kapot Samman for starting a new sect of journalism. He says that in Kashmir, they converted Hindus first to Buddhism and then to Islam.

"Hindus face a greater threat from Neo Buddhists than Islam", Shankaracharya ji after giving me the Kapot Samman for starting a new sect of journalism. He says that in Kashmir, they converted Hindus first to Buddhism and then to Islam.

Shubham Sharma

129,612 次观看 • 8 个月前

Taiwan's Buddhism being the dominant faith that grew from 8% to 35% in the past few decades is just testament of the power of the Triple Gems. The President of Taiwan would attend ceremony at Buddhist temples every year, signifying the primary position of Buddhism in the country. 蒋万安 Chiang Wan-An, Taipei's mayor and the great grandson of famous Christian dictator Chiang Kai Shek was even seen attending Buddhist Master Hsing Yun's funeral holding incense and praying. He is obviously no longer a Christian even though his family was and he even endearingly called Master Hsing Yun, 师父 which means Venerable Father, normally like how a disciple called a Buddhist Master in the video, instead of the normal 法师 which means Dharma Master.

Taiwan's Buddhism being the dominant faith that grew from 8% to 35% in the past few decades is just testament of the power of the Triple Gems. The President of Taiwan would attend ceremony at Buddhist temples every year, signifying the primary position of Buddhism in the country. 蒋万安 Chiang Wan-An, Taipei's mayor and the great grandson of famous Christian dictator Chiang Kai Shek was even seen attending Buddhist Master Hsing Yun's funeral holding incense and praying. He is obviously no longer a Christian even though his family was and he even endearingly called Master Hsing Yun, 师父 which means Venerable Father, normally like how a disciple called a Buddhist Master in the video, instead of the normal 法师 which means Dharma Master.

JJ Ashoka Wong ☸️🏴

10,468 次观看 • 5 个月前

Here is a clear and neutral summary of the Instagram controversy between AbdurRehman Cheema and Arsalan Parahi. Cheema's viewpoint is that when Islam arrived in the region (7th-8th century CE when the Arab conquest of Sindh took place,ancestors of modern day Pakistanis were primarily Buddhist,he emphasizes the rich Buddhist heritage of the area esp in Gandhara( parts of northern Punjab,KP,Taxila,Swat etc) portraying Buddhism as the dominant or defining pre Islamic faith of the local population. Parahi's viewpoint is that Buddhism had already significantly declined in the region long before Islam's arrival,by the period, between 4th and 7th centuries CE, Hindu traditions( or a resurgence of Brahmanical/Hindu practices) had become more prominent or widely followed,he argues that Islam didnot "end" a thriving Buddhist era in what is now Pakistan,instead Buddhism had been weakening for centuries due to earlier factors( such as invasion of Alchon Huns in the 5th-6th centuries,loss of patronage and the arrival of practices under the dynasties like the Gupta and local rulers,by the time,Muslim armies reached Sindh in 711 CE, the religious landscape was more mixed or shifting towards Hindu-influenced traditions in many parts. In short, the disagreement is mainly about the timing and dominance in the centuries immediately before Islam's arrival,one side sees a still Buddhist society before while the other sees a post -Buddhist or (Buddhist declining,Hindu-resurgent) landscape). Historically, the actual picture was complex and regional,Buddhism remained strong in parts of Gandhara and Sindh( as mentioned by Chinese pilgrims like Xuanzang) but it had faced setbacks from Hun invasions and was coexisting/competing with reviving Hindu practices. Neither view is entirely wrong but they emphasize different phases and regions of a diverse religious history .

Here is a clear and neutral summary of the Instagram controversy between AbdurRehman Cheema and Arsalan Parahi. Cheema's viewpoint is that when Islam arrived in the region (7th-8th century CE when the Arab conquest of Sindh took place,ancestors of modern day Pakistanis were primarily Buddhist,he emphasizes the rich Buddhist heritage of the area esp in Gandhara( parts of northern Punjab,KP,Taxila,Swat etc) portraying Buddhism as the dominant or defining pre Islamic faith of the local population. Parahi's viewpoint is that Buddhism had already significantly declined in the region long before Islam's arrival,by the period, between 4th and 7th centuries CE, Hindu traditions( or a resurgence of Brahmanical/Hindu practices) had become more prominent or widely followed,he argues that Islam didnot "end" a thriving Buddhist era in what is now Pakistan,instead Buddhism had been weakening for centuries due to earlier factors( such as invasion of Alchon Huns in the 5th-6th centuries,loss of patronage and the arrival of practices under the dynasties like the Gupta and local rulers,by the time,Muslim armies reached Sindh in 711 CE, the religious landscape was more mixed or shifting towards Hindu-influenced traditions in many parts. In short, the disagreement is mainly about the timing and dominance in the centuries immediately before Islam's arrival,one side sees a still Buddhist society before while the other sees a post -Buddhist or (Buddhist declining,Hindu-resurgent) landscape). Historically, the actual picture was complex and regional,Buddhism remained strong in parts of Gandhara and Sindh( as mentioned by Chinese pilgrims like Xuanzang) but it had faced setbacks from Hun invasions and was coexisting/competing with reviving Hindu practices. Neither view is entirely wrong but they emphasize different phases and regions of a diverse religious history .

Shumail 🇵🇰🍁

64,772 次观看 • 4 个月前

“Good Buddhism vs. Bad Hinduism" I serendipitously came across a video short featuring Koenraad Elst, who offers a profound observation. Please watch it👇before proceeding to read further. The "good Buddhism, bad Hinduism" narrative lacks roots in ancient Indian history. Buddhism emerged as a Darshana, an agnostic philosophical school rejecting the Vedas as pramaña, within the broader ecosystem of Hindutva. Please note that Hindutva, originally coined by Chandranath Basu in 1892, is the modern indigenous name for our ancient religion Sanatana Dharma, and we use it in that sense, not in any political or nationalistic sense. Buddhism drew almost all core concepts like karma, dharma, and samsara from Vedic traditions with Buddhist texts heavily borrowing from them. In ancient India, lay practitioners often blended Buddhism and Hindutva seamlessly, without a sharp divide. Buddhism was, in essence, deeply rooted in Hindutva until external forces reframed it. This false binary took shape in the 19th century through colonial Orientalist scholarship, filtered through a Judeo-Christian lens. Western scholars, including missionaries and Indologists like Max Müller, portrayed Hindutva’s polytheism and “idol worship” as superstitious and its caste system as “socially oppressive”, likening it to pre-Reformation Catholicism. Meanwhile, Buddhism’s focus on “compassion” and monastic simplicity was romanticised as a "Protestant-like" reform — enlightened, universal, and akin to Christian ethics. Financial disparities reinforced this: Buddhist studies received patronage from Japan, China, and Western donors, while Hindutva, tied to an impoverished India, lacked similar support. Post-1947, political and ideological forces entrenched this narrative. Nehruvian socialism and Marxist historiography cast Buddhism as a “rational”, “progressive force”, crediting it for Hindutva’s “positive” elements while blaming Hindutva for its inadequacies. Ambedkar’s 1956 mass conversion to Buddhism — his invented Navayana Buddhism, which retains little of traditional Buddhism beyond its name — presented it as an escape from “Hindu oppression,” focusing on caste critique, despite Buddhism’s own historical monastic hierarchies and caste-like structures. Left-leaning academics, media, and textbooks perpetuated this to push anti-Hindu, “egalitarian” agendas, ignoring Buddhism’s elite urban origins. In the West, Buddhism’s “philosophical” image (meditation, mindfulness, and lack of a creator god) aligns with secular and New Age preferences, making it a marketable, “cool” non-theistic tradition. Hindutva, with its diverse rituals and deities, is stereotyped as exotic yet backward, scrutinised over caste without nuance as caste is only social organisation. This fuels more funding, academic positions, and media portrayals (e.g., films like Little Buddha) glorifying Buddhism, while Hindutva faces disproportionate criticism, nay vilification. This narrative is driven by diverse actors with aligned goals of vilifying Hindutva: colonial Christian Indologists and missionaries demonised it to aid conversions; Indian intellectuals like Nehru, Ambedkar, and Marxist historians like Romila Thapar advanced pseudo-secular, anti-Hindutva agendas; modern English media and deep-state-inspired Dalit groups promote Ambedkarite views, framing Buddhism as empowerment; Western academics like Sheldon Pollock and outlets like The New York Times benefit from well-funded Buddhist studies chairs that outnumber those for Hindutva; Buddhist institutions, from ancient monasteries to modern Tibetan exile networks and Western converts, emphasise differences to secure patronage; and global cultural dynamics promote Buddhism as a “universal” export, erasing its Hindu roots to enable Hinduphobia and support missionary conversion tactics. Buddhists following traditional schools such as Theravāda, Mahāyāna, and Vajrayāna must understand and recognize that Hindutva (Sanātana Dharma) is the foundation of Buddhism, without which it cannot exist. They should not fall for the deep-state-inspired Ambedkarite Navayāna narratives, which have nothing to do with traditional Buddhism, or Abrahamic strategies that divide and destroy non-Abrahamic traditions. In Southeast Asia and elsewhere, including India, Christian missionaries, not Hindus, have been converting Buddhists, thereby altering the religious character of those societies and destroying Buddhism. Likewise, Islam has destroyed Buddhism in Afghanistan and the Central Asian republics. As recently as 2001, the Islamic Taliban bombed and destroyed the Bamiyan Buddhas. The Islamic term but parasti, meaning "idol worship," is derived from the word Buddha, in reference to the idols associated with Buddhism. Therefore, in their own self-interest , traditional Buddhists must reject false victimhood and the anti-Hindu weaponisation of their tradition, for Hindus are not their enemy. On the contrary, the enemies of Buddhism and Hindutva are the same; they merely try to create a wedge between Buddhists and Hindus to destroy both.

“Good Buddhism vs. Bad Hinduism" I serendipitously came across a video short featuring Koenraad Elst, who offers a profound observation. Please watch it👇before proceeding to read further. The "good Buddhism, bad Hinduism" narrative lacks roots in ancient Indian history. Buddhism emerged as a Darshana, an agnostic philosophical school rejecting the Vedas as pramaña, within the broader ecosystem of Hindutva. Please note that Hindutva, originally coined by Chandranath Basu in 1892, is the modern indigenous name for our ancient religion Sanatana Dharma, and we use it in that sense, not in any political or nationalistic sense. Buddhism drew almost all core concepts like karma, dharma, and samsara from Vedic traditions with Buddhist texts heavily borrowing from them. In ancient India, lay practitioners often blended Buddhism and Hindutva seamlessly, without a sharp divide. Buddhism was, in essence, deeply rooted in Hindutva until external forces reframed it. This false binary took shape in the 19th century through colonial Orientalist scholarship, filtered through a Judeo-Christian lens. Western scholars, including missionaries and Indologists like Max Müller, portrayed Hindutva’s polytheism and “idol worship” as superstitious and its caste system as “socially oppressive”, likening it to pre-Reformation Catholicism. Meanwhile, Buddhism’s focus on “compassion” and monastic simplicity was romanticised as a "Protestant-like" reform — enlightened, universal, and akin to Christian ethics. Financial disparities reinforced this: Buddhist studies received patronage from Japan, China, and Western donors, while Hindutva, tied to an impoverished India, lacked similar support. Post-1947, political and ideological forces entrenched this narrative. Nehruvian socialism and Marxist historiography cast Buddhism as a “rational”, “progressive force”, crediting it for Hindutva’s “positive” elements while blaming Hindutva for its inadequacies. Ambedkar’s 1956 mass conversion to Buddhism — his invented Navayana Buddhism, which retains little of traditional Buddhism beyond its name — presented it as an escape from “Hindu oppression,” focusing on caste critique, despite Buddhism’s own historical monastic hierarchies and caste-like structures. Left-leaning academics, media, and textbooks perpetuated this to push anti-Hindu, “egalitarian” agendas, ignoring Buddhism’s elite urban origins. In the West, Buddhism’s “philosophical” image (meditation, mindfulness, and lack of a creator god) aligns with secular and New Age preferences, making it a marketable, “cool” non-theistic tradition. Hindutva, with its diverse rituals and deities, is stereotyped as exotic yet backward, scrutinised over caste without nuance as caste is only social organisation. This fuels more funding, academic positions, and media portrayals (e.g., films like Little Buddha) glorifying Buddhism, while Hindutva faces disproportionate criticism, nay vilification. This narrative is driven by diverse actors with aligned goals of vilifying Hindutva: colonial Christian Indologists and missionaries demonised it to aid conversions; Indian intellectuals like Nehru, Ambedkar, and Marxist historians like Romila Thapar advanced pseudo-secular, anti-Hindutva agendas; modern English media and deep-state-inspired Dalit groups promote Ambedkarite views, framing Buddhism as empowerment; Western academics like Sheldon Pollock and outlets like The New York Times benefit from well-funded Buddhist studies chairs that outnumber those for Hindutva; Buddhist institutions, from ancient monasteries to modern Tibetan exile networks and Western converts, emphasise differences to secure patronage; and global cultural dynamics promote Buddhism as a “universal” export, erasing its Hindu roots to enable Hinduphobia and support missionary conversion tactics. Buddhists following traditional schools such as Theravāda, Mahāyāna, and Vajrayāna must understand and recognize that Hindutva (Sanātana Dharma) is the foundation of Buddhism, without which it cannot exist. They should not fall for the deep-state-inspired Ambedkarite Navayāna narratives, which have nothing to do with traditional Buddhism, or Abrahamic strategies that divide and destroy non-Abrahamic traditions. In Southeast Asia and elsewhere, including India, Christian missionaries, not Hindus, have been converting Buddhists, thereby altering the religious character of those societies and destroying Buddhism. Likewise, Islam has destroyed Buddhism in Afghanistan and the Central Asian republics. As recently as 2001, the Islamic Taliban bombed and destroyed the Bamiyan Buddhas. The Islamic term but parasti, meaning "idol worship," is derived from the word Buddha, in reference to the idols associated with Buddhism. Therefore, in their own self-interest , traditional Buddhists must reject false victimhood and the anti-Hindu weaponisation of their tradition, for Hindus are not their enemy. On the contrary, the enemies of Buddhism and Hindutva are the same; they merely try to create a wedge between Buddhists and Hindus to destroy both.

M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)

52,463 次观看 • 10 个月前

This is Ambedkarite-Periyarist-Marxist activist Arun Siddharth and his gang being chased out of Jaffna by Tamils. He once stated he will demolish the Nallur Hindu temple to build a public toilet. His goal is to convert Tamils to Buddhism and assimilate them with Sinhalese. He’s a goon of the Sri Lankan military intelligence and is promoted by the Sinhalese Buddhist establishment in the name of anti-caste. This project of cultural genocide is disguised in progressive language to fool outsiders which is why Sinhalese Buddhists pose a uniquely insidious form of threat.

This is Ambedkarite-Periyarist-Marxist activist Arun Siddharth and his gang being chased out of Jaffna by Tamils. He once stated he will demolish the Nallur Hindu temple to build a public toilet. His goal is to convert Tamils to Buddhism and assimilate them with Sinhalese. He’s a goon of the Sri Lankan military intelligence and is promoted by the Sinhalese Buddhist establishment in the name of anti-caste. This project of cultural genocide is disguised in progressive language to fool outsiders which is why Sinhalese Buddhists pose a uniquely insidious form of threat.

Zero

17,566 次观看 • 10 个月前

Here is a case from Meerut, UP where a Buddhist Jatav woman married a Muslim man ☪️☸️ > Hindus went to protest against the marriage > Instead, she started abusing Hindu deities > Her Ambedkarite mother was fully supportive of the marriage

Here is a case from Meerut, UP where a Buddhist Jatav woman married a Muslim man ☪️☸️ > Hindus went to protest against the marriage > Instead, she started abusing Hindu deities > Her Ambedkarite mother was fully supportive of the marriage

do'o kappa

108,437 次观看 • 2 个月前

In a tribute to Tiger Woods' late mother Tida, the 7th hole The Genesis Invitational will feature an all white flag. A native of Thailand, Tida was a faithful Buddhist, and the No. 7 and color white are significant in Buddhism and will be displayed in her honor.

In a tribute to Tiger Woods' late mother Tida, the 7th hole The Genesis Invitational will feature an all white flag. A native of Thailand, Tida was a faithful Buddhist, and the No. 7 and color white are significant in Buddhism and will be displayed in her honor.

PGA TOUR

513,561 次观看 • 1 年前

SINISTER!! Modi in Bhutan first claimed Varanasi to be land of Buddha , and then promised to give land for Bhutanese temple , which would basically be a Buddhist temple in Varanasi! So the most sacred, most holy city for Hindus, city of Lord Shiva is now land of Buddha? And a buddhist temple will be built there? Why not in Vadnagar in Gujarat? So that after few decades Buddhist lobby officially claims it as their own? He wants to destroy everything sacred to Hindus.

SINISTER!! Modi in Bhutan first claimed Varanasi to be land of Buddha , and then promised to give land for Bhutanese temple , which would basically be a Buddhist temple in Varanasi! So the most sacred, most holy city for Hindus, city of Lord Shiva is now land of Buddha? And a buddhist temple will be built there? Why not in Vadnagar in Gujarat? So that after few decades Buddhist lobby officially claims it as their own? He wants to destroy everything sacred to Hindus.

Ritu #सत्यसाधक

34,171 次观看 • 9 个月前

ALERT: Humanoid robot ‘Gabi’ has taken a vow to become the first robot monk at a celebration in South Korea. The robot was given the dharma name ‘Gabi’ as it attended a ceremony dressed in traditional Buddhist robes and a kasaya, joining monks in prayer with its palms pressed together in the courtyard of Daeungjeon Hall at Jogyesa Temple. The “sugye” ceremony is a Buddhist ritual in which participants pledge devotion to Buddha.

ALERT: Humanoid robot ‘Gabi’ has taken a vow to become the first robot monk at a celebration in South Korea. The robot was given the dharma name ‘Gabi’ as it attended a ceremony dressed in traditional Buddhist robes and a kasaya, joining monks in prayer with its palms pressed together in the courtyard of Daeungjeon Hall at Jogyesa Temple. The “sugye” ceremony is a Buddhist ritual in which participants pledge devotion to Buddha.

E X X ➠A L E R T S

42,071 次观看 • 3 个月前

The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism is comprised of 5,000 entries totaling over a million words, and Donald S. Lopez Jr. (along with his co-author) wrote every word of it. He’s also written over 20 books on Buddhism, including Buddhism: A Journey through History, which tylercowen calls one of the best books of 2025. Who better to explain what the West gets wrong about Buddhism? Timestamps: 0:00:00 – The Buddha’s omniscience 0:03:13 – How the Buddha looked and lived 0:08:25 – Reincarnation, hell, sacrifice, and hungry ghosts 0:11:52 – Western (mis)conceptions of Buddhism (not always peaceful!) 0:17:15 – Buddha’s child, castes, and visual portrayals of the Buddha 0:22:50 – Buddhism as an oral religion 0:26:13 – How different strands of Buddhism coexist 0:29:27 – Global waning of Buddhism 0:32:20 – On the Dalai Lama 0:37:20 – The Tibetan Book of the Dead and Theosophy 0:41:39 – Zen Buddhism and South Asian strands 0:46:00 – Why Thailand is the wealthiest amongst Buddhist countries 0:48:21 – Itinerary for a world tour of Buddhism 0:50:01 – How Lopez became a leading scholar on Buddhism

The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism is comprised of 5,000 entries totaling over a million words, and Donald S. Lopez Jr. (along with his co-author) wrote every word of it. He’s also written over 20 books on Buddhism, including Buddhism: A Journey through History, which tylercowen calls one of the best books of 2025. Who better to explain what the West gets wrong about Buddhism? Timestamps: 0:00:00 – The Buddha’s omniscience 0:03:13 – How the Buddha looked and lived 0:08:25 – Reincarnation, hell, sacrifice, and hungry ghosts 0:11:52 – Western (mis)conceptions of Buddhism (not always peaceful!) 0:17:15 – Buddha’s child, castes, and visual portrayals of the Buddha 0:22:50 – Buddhism as an oral religion 0:26:13 – How different strands of Buddhism coexist 0:29:27 – Global waning of Buddhism 0:32:20 – On the Dalai Lama 0:37:20 – The Tibetan Book of the Dead and Theosophy 0:41:39 – Zen Buddhism and South Asian strands 0:46:00 – Why Thailand is the wealthiest amongst Buddhist countries 0:48:21 – Itinerary for a world tour of Buddhism 0:50:01 – How Lopez became a leading scholar on Buddhism

Conversations with Tyler

11,859 次观看 • 9 个月前

A Ladakhi youth asked His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama about the purpose of life. In response, His Holiness said that life becomes meaningful when one is able to contribute to the society in which one lives. His Holiness gave his own life as an example, saying that he has devoted himself to serving the Tibetan people and the Tibetan Buddhist religion. If he is able to continue making such a contribution, His Holiness said, he considers the purpose of his life fulfilled. Video Courtesy: Office of His Holiness the Dalai Lama

A Ladakhi youth asked His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama about the purpose of life. In response, His Holiness said that life becomes meaningful when one is able to contribute to the society in which one lives. His Holiness gave his own life as an example, saying that he has devoted himself to serving the Tibetan people and the Tibetan Buddhist religion. If he is able to continue making such a contribution, His Holiness said, he considers the purpose of his life fulfilled. Video Courtesy: Office of His Holiness the Dalai Lama

Tibet.Net

13,899 次观看 • 12 天前

Watch the full interview of Buddhist Bhntas who are doing protests to remove Hindu Devi Devtas from Maha Bodhi temple. We talked about reservation, Hindu Dharm, why they hate Brahmins and why after adopting Buddhism, Ambedkarites are still copying Hindu rituals. It was a wonderful interview session. Full video link is in the comment.

Watch the full interview of Buddhist Bhntas who are doing protests to remove Hindu Devi Devtas from Maha Bodhi temple. We talked about reservation, Hindu Dharm, why they hate Brahmins and why after adopting Buddhism, Ambedkarites are still copying Hindu rituals. It was a wonderful interview session. Full video link is in the comment.

Shubham Sharma

24,746 次观看 • 9 个月前

This is why Manusmriti is so important for Hindus👇 To just escape Ambedkarites or unite them against Shantidoots, we can't allow them to burn our ancient Dharmashashtras. Ambedkar was not a god. At one moment, he was requesting Britishers to stay in India. Listen to the words of Pujya Shri Shankaracharya ji.

This is why Manusmriti is so important for Hindus👇 To just escape Ambedkarites or unite them against Shantidoots, we can't allow them to burn our ancient Dharmashashtras. Ambedkar was not a god. At one moment, he was requesting Britishers to stay in India. Listen to the words of Pujya Shri Shankaracharya ji.

Shubham Sharma

18,028 次观看 • 1 年前

THE MATRIX SPOON BOY'S MESSAGE Many have seen the Matrix but it seems fewer grasp just how powerful the 'spoon boy's' message was when Neo first visits the oracle... The boy says to Neo: "Do not try and bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth...there is no spoon. Then you'll see that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself." What he's saying is there is nothing that is NOT yourself, BECAUSE 'Neo' was not just an entity as the body, 'Neo' was the entire Matrix becoming self aware to re-write and change itself - this is why in the final movie there is rain and in the very end there is sunshine. Anyone who knows the Matrix knows EVERYTHING which appears is really shaped through Matrix code which means 'Neo' (who could visibly see this code) was all of the characters and places, not just the one we saw in the flesh as 'Neo'. Why do you think in the end Mr Smith asks Neo if he realises its impossible to win, that he simply can't.... And the reason nothing can be 'won' is they are not separate and Neo began realising himself as 'The Matrix' itself rather than just a body which is why he no longer fights Smith and allows him to enter his body.... The body was not 'Neo'.... 'Neo' becoming the chosen one is acknowledging the self as the entire Matrix, as one self and not two...(Mr. Anderson and Smith) There is no body which is separate from earth, only MIND has made this concept. Earth and body are ONE beyond what we call them... We are not Mr Anderson nor Neo, we are the entire Matrix writing itself to experience itself. Realise everything in the form which changes is only yourself because the self is not just limited to this body... Each and everyone of you are this 'CHOSEN ONE'. But what did Morpheus say to Neo... "DON'T THINK YOU ARE, KNOW YOU ARE"..... Until The One believes... They remain as just a character feeling stuck inside of something or somewhere when there is no where or place separate from your true self - which is why in the beginning it says: "The Matrix Has You..." In the beginning he existed as an illusory identity of Mr Anderson, the Matrix had him but he did not have the Matrix. He was not aware of the self beyond identity and form so through meeting Morpheus, "he died" and realised himself as the "chosen one" who can directly change and save his experience. What this means is ANYONE of these characters could of became 'Neo' because Neo is a realisation of the true self similar to "Christ Consciousness" as we know it... We are ALL this chosen one but until this is realised, we will never find it but seek it.... You do not become it, you ARE already IT... Any process is like running past the finish line after you've won a race, if you continue running, when do you acknowledge you've already finished... ✨🙌🏾💫 © Awakened Gnostic

THE MATRIX SPOON BOY'S MESSAGE Many have seen the Matrix but it seems fewer grasp just how powerful the 'spoon boy's' message was when Neo first visits the oracle... The boy says to Neo: "Do not try and bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth...there is no spoon. Then you'll see that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself." What he's saying is there is nothing that is NOT yourself, BECAUSE 'Neo' was not just an entity as the body, 'Neo' was the entire Matrix becoming self aware to re-write and change itself - this is why in the final movie there is rain and in the very end there is sunshine. Anyone who knows the Matrix knows EVERYTHING which appears is really shaped through Matrix code which means 'Neo' (who could visibly see this code) was all of the characters and places, not just the one we saw in the flesh as 'Neo'. Why do you think in the end Mr Smith asks Neo if he realises its impossible to win, that he simply can't.... And the reason nothing can be 'won' is they are not separate and Neo began realising himself as 'The Matrix' itself rather than just a body which is why he no longer fights Smith and allows him to enter his body.... The body was not 'Neo'.... 'Neo' becoming the chosen one is acknowledging the self as the entire Matrix, as one self and not two...(Mr. Anderson and Smith) There is no body which is separate from earth, only MIND has made this concept. Earth and body are ONE beyond what we call them... We are not Mr Anderson nor Neo, we are the entire Matrix writing itself to experience itself. Realise everything in the form which changes is only yourself because the self is not just limited to this body... Each and everyone of you are this 'CHOSEN ONE'. But what did Morpheus say to Neo... "DON'T THINK YOU ARE, KNOW YOU ARE"..... Until The One believes... They remain as just a character feeling stuck inside of something or somewhere when there is no where or place separate from your true self - which is why in the beginning it says: "The Matrix Has You..." In the beginning he existed as an illusory identity of Mr Anderson, the Matrix had him but he did not have the Matrix. He was not aware of the self beyond identity and form so through meeting Morpheus, "he died" and realised himself as the "chosen one" who can directly change and save his experience. What this means is ANYONE of these characters could of became 'Neo' because Neo is a realisation of the true self similar to "Christ Consciousness" as we know it... We are ALL this chosen one but until this is realised, we will never find it but seek it.... You do not become it, you ARE already IT... Any process is like running past the finish line after you've won a race, if you continue running, when do you acknowledge you've already finished... ✨🙌🏾💫 © Awakened Gnostic

🧬Maxpein🧬

59,563 次观看 • 9 个月前

THE MATRIX SPOON BOY'S MESSAGE Many have seen the Matrix but it seems fewer grasp just how powerful the 'spoon boy's' message was when Neo first visits the oracle... The boy says to Neo: "Do not try and bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth...there is no spoon. Then you'll see that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself." What he's saying is there is nothing that is NOT yourself, BECAUSE 'Neo' was not just an entity as the body, 'Neo' was the entire Matrix becoming self aware to re-write and change itself - this is why in the final movie there is rain and in the very end there is sunshine. Anyone who knows the Matrix knows EVERYTHING which appears is really shaped through Matrix code which means 'Neo' (who could visibly see this code) was all of the characters and places, not just the one we saw in the flesh as 'Neo'. Why do you think in the end Mr Smith asks Neo if he realises its impossible to win, that he simply can't.... And the reason nothing can be 'won' is they are not separate and Neo began realising himself as 'The Matrix' itself rather than just a body which is why he no longer fights Smith and allows him to enter his body.... The body was not 'Neo'.... 'Neo' becoming the chosen one is acknowledging the self as the entire Matrix, as one self and not two...(Mr. Anderson and Smith) There is no body which is separate from earth, only MIND has made this concept. Earth and body are ONE beyond what we call them... We are not Mr Anderson nor Neo, we are the entire Matrix writing itself to experience itself. Realise everything in the form which changes is only yourself because the self is not just limited to this body... Each and everyone of you are this 'CHOSEN ONE'. But what did Morpheus say to Neo... "DON'T THINK YOU ARE, KNOW YOU ARE"..... Until The One believes... They remain as just a character feeling stuck inside of something or somewhere when there is no where or place separate from your true self - which is why in the beginning it says: "The Matrix Has You..." In the beginning he existed as an illusory identity of Mr Anderson, the Matrix had him but he did not have the Matrix. He was not aware of the self beyond identity and form so through meeting Morpheus, "he died" and realised himself as the "chosen one" who can directly change and save his experience. What this means is ANYONE of these characters could of became 'Neo' because Neo is a realisation of the true self similar to "Christ Consciousness" as we know it... We are ALL this chosen one but until this is realised, we will never find it but seek it.... You do not become it, you ARE already IT... Any process is like running past the finish line after you've won a race, if you continue running, when do you acknowledge you've already finished... ✨🙌🏾💫 © Awakened Gnostic

THE MATRIX SPOON BOY'S MESSAGE Many have seen the Matrix but it seems fewer grasp just how powerful the 'spoon boy's' message was when Neo first visits the oracle... The boy says to Neo: "Do not try and bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth...there is no spoon. Then you'll see that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself." What he's saying is there is nothing that is NOT yourself, BECAUSE 'Neo' was not just an entity as the body, 'Neo' was the entire Matrix becoming self aware to re-write and change itself - this is why in the final movie there is rain and in the very end there is sunshine. Anyone who knows the Matrix knows EVERYTHING which appears is really shaped through Matrix code which means 'Neo' (who could visibly see this code) was all of the characters and places, not just the one we saw in the flesh as 'Neo'. Why do you think in the end Mr Smith asks Neo if he realises its impossible to win, that he simply can't.... And the reason nothing can be 'won' is they are not separate and Neo began realising himself as 'The Matrix' itself rather than just a body which is why he no longer fights Smith and allows him to enter his body.... The body was not 'Neo'.... 'Neo' becoming the chosen one is acknowledging the self as the entire Matrix, as one self and not two...(Mr. Anderson and Smith) There is no body which is separate from earth, only MIND has made this concept. Earth and body are ONE beyond what we call them... We are not Mr Anderson nor Neo, we are the entire Matrix writing itself to experience itself. Realise everything in the form which changes is only yourself because the self is not just limited to this body... Each and everyone of you are this 'CHOSEN ONE'. But what did Morpheus say to Neo... "DON'T THINK YOU ARE, KNOW YOU ARE"..... Until The One believes... They remain as just a character feeling stuck inside of something or somewhere when there is no where or place separate from your true self - which is why in the beginning it says: "The Matrix Has You..." In the beginning he existed as an illusory identity of Mr Anderson, the Matrix had him but he did not have the Matrix. He was not aware of the self beyond identity and form so through meeting Morpheus, "he died" and realised himself as the "chosen one" who can directly change and save his experience. What this means is ANYONE of these characters could of became 'Neo' because Neo is a realisation of the true self similar to "Christ Consciousness" as we know it... We are ALL this chosen one but until this is realised, we will never find it but seek it.... You do not become it, you ARE already IT... Any process is like running past the finish line after you've won a race, if you continue running, when do you acknowledge you've already finished... ✨🙌🏾💫 © Awakened Gnostic

🧬Maxpein🧬

129,688 次观看 • 1 年前

Immortal India Podcast (Did You Know Series) Episode 8: The Nazi Symbol "Hakenkreuz" is NOT the Dharmic symbol "Swastika". Hakenkreuz is a symbol of hatred. Swastika is actually an ancient Hindu/Buddhist/Jain/Sikh symbol for peace & well-being. The German word Hakenkreuz was erroneously, and perhaps mischievously, translated into English as Swastika. Indians and Hindus/Buddhists/Jain/Sikhs had nothing to do with the Nazis. Please don't use Swastika when referring to the Nazis; use their own term viz: Hakenkreuz

Immortal India Podcast (Did You Know Series) Episode 8: The Nazi Symbol "Hakenkreuz" is NOT the Dharmic symbol "Swastika". Hakenkreuz is a symbol of hatred. Swastika is actually an ancient Hindu/Buddhist/Jain/Sikh symbol for peace & well-being. The German word Hakenkreuz was erroneously, and perhaps mischievously, translated into English as Swastika. Indians and Hindus/Buddhists/Jain/Sikhs had nothing to do with the Nazis. Please don't use Swastika when referring to the Nazis; use their own term viz: Hakenkreuz

Amish Tripathi

64,455 次观看 • 1 年前

Explosive revelation by Swami Govindanand ji. He says - it's Priyanka Vadra who appointed Avimukteshwaranand the Shankaracharya of Jyotirmath. When Guruji Swaroopananda became 'Brahmleen', and the issue of new Shankaracharya went to SC, Congress issued a letter recognising Avimukteshwaranand as Shankaracharya. In reality he (Govindanand ji) was the real successor but Congress snatched his rights using power to fix their own man.

Explosive revelation by Swami Govindanand ji. He says - it's Priyanka Vadra who appointed Avimukteshwaranand the Shankaracharya of Jyotirmath. When Guruji Swaroopananda became 'Brahmleen', and the issue of new Shankaracharya went to SC, Congress issued a letter recognising Avimukteshwaranand as Shankaracharya. In reality he (Govindanand ji) was the real successor but Congress snatched his rights using power to fix their own man.

Mr Sinha

1,062,308 次观看 • 2 年前