Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🇺🇸🇮🇷 America destroyed one rocket launcher with a single drone, and Iran answered with 515 missiles Andreas Krieg zeroed in on the mismatch. Washington chose a drone rather than an airstrike, deliberately small, hoping to stop the mine-laying without provoking much. Tehran replied with a strategic barrage across Jordan,...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,886,992 subscribers

323,643 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🇮🇷🇺🇸 One US drone strike on a rocket launcher brought fifteen Iranian missiles down on Jordan, the Navy and the UAE. Defense analyst Dr. Andreas Krieg says the exchange rate tells you who has room to move and who doesn't: "America has no levers." Iran is pulling every one it holds while Washington reaches for tools it already spent, and Tehran can see the difference from across the Gulf. Dr Andreas Krieg
2:03

🇮🇷🇺🇸 One US drone strike on a rocket launcher brought fifteen Iranian missiles down on Jordan, the Navy and the UAE. Defense analyst Dr. Andreas Krieg says the exchange rate tells you who has room to move and who doesn't: "America has no levers." Iran is pulling every one it holds while Washington reaches for tools it already spent, and Tehran can see the difference from across the Gulf. Dr Andreas Krieg

Mario Nawfal

99,244 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

"Dr Andreas Krieg: The Iranians don’t have a lot of choice. They needed to escalate, and they needed to dictate the tempo of escalation as well, rather than remaining on the receiving end. I do think Iran is miscalculating in thinking it can pressure the Gulf states into becoming Trump’s pressure points—when in reality Trump’s pressure point at the moment is Israel"
3:57

"Dr Andreas Krieg: The Iranians don’t have a lot of choice. They needed to escalate, and they needed to dictate the tempo of escalation as well, rather than remaining on the receiving end. I do think Iran is miscalculating in thinking it can pressure the Gulf states into becoming Trump’s pressure points—when in reality Trump’s pressure point at the moment is Israel"

Dr Andreas Krieg

39,254 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🇸🇦🇮🇷 The Gulf is diversifying its weapons and alliances, and only two countries would actually fight for it. Defense analyst Dr. Andreas Krieg says the United States and Israel remain the sole real guarantors, and neither is a comfortable answer for any Arab capital: "Fifty years of sanctions, of punitive actions in the economic realm, diplomatic realm, military realm, have shown that you cannot deter them by punishment." Half a century of the same approach, and nobody has seriously tried the other one. Dr Andreas Krieg
4:06

🇸🇦🇮🇷 The Gulf is diversifying its weapons and alliances, and only two countries would actually fight for it. Defense analyst Dr. Andreas Krieg says the United States and Israel remain the sole real guarantors, and neither is a comfortable answer for any Arab capital: "Fifty years of sanctions, of punitive actions in the economic realm, diplomatic realm, military realm, have shown that you cannot deter them by punishment." Half a century of the same approach, and nobody has seriously tried the other one. Dr Andreas Krieg

Mario Nawfal

77,746 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

The U.S. and Iran are locked in the same conflict, but waging completely different wars. America is destroying more targets, firing more advanced weapons, and delivering far greater firepower than Iran, but military analyst Andreas Krieg told Brandon Weichert it's still losing the war. Tehran is preserving its missile stockpiles, stretching the conflict out, and forcing the U.S. to burn through extremely expensive interceptors and precision munitions. It's a strategy of endurance, not dominance. According to Andreas, that's exactly why Iran doesn't need to win battlefield after battlefield; it simply has to survive. He points to Iranian strikes that have degraded U.S. surveillance and reconnaissance networks across the Gulf, forcing Washington to use more resources simply to maintain the same level of awareness. At the same time, the IRGC continues operating through decentralised units that don't depend on the military infrastructure America has spent weeks destroying. The U.S. can demolish radar sites, flatten bases and logistics hubs, but if the system keeps functioning, what's really changed? Andreas believes the trap Washington is falling into is measuring success by the number of targets destroyed rather than whether those strikes are changing the political reality. Meanwhile, America's own partners are paying the price. As civilian infrastructure inside Iran comes under attack, Tehran has responded by targeting energy facilities and desalination plants across the Gulf. Countries like Kuwait, Bahrain and Qatar suddenly find themselves pulled into a war they never chose. According to Andreas, Gulf leaders are now putting heavy pressure on Washington to dial back the escalation before their own economies and critical infrastructure suffer even greater damage. And then there's the question Washington still hasn't convincingly answered: What does victory actually look like? America is measuring success by how much damage it can inflict. Iran is measuring success by whether it can still fight tomorrow. Andreas believes only one of those strategies has a believable path to victory. Brandon Weichert Dr Andreas Krieg
47:20

The U.S. and Iran are locked in the same conflict, but waging completely different wars. America is destroying more targets, firing more advanced weapons, and delivering far greater firepower than Iran, but military analyst Andreas Krieg told Brandon Weichert it's still losing the war. Tehran is preserving its missile stockpiles, stretching the conflict out, and forcing the U.S. to burn through extremely expensive interceptors and precision munitions. It's a strategy of endurance, not dominance. According to Andreas, that's exactly why Iran doesn't need to win battlefield after battlefield; it simply has to survive. He points to Iranian strikes that have degraded U.S. surveillance and reconnaissance networks across the Gulf, forcing Washington to use more resources simply to maintain the same level of awareness. At the same time, the IRGC continues operating through decentralised units that don't depend on the military infrastructure America has spent weeks destroying. The U.S. can demolish radar sites, flatten bases and logistics hubs, but if the system keeps functioning, what's really changed? Andreas believes the trap Washington is falling into is measuring success by the number of targets destroyed rather than whether those strikes are changing the political reality. Meanwhile, America's own partners are paying the price. As civilian infrastructure inside Iran comes under attack, Tehran has responded by targeting energy facilities and desalination plants across the Gulf. Countries like Kuwait, Bahrain and Qatar suddenly find themselves pulled into a war they never chose. According to Andreas, Gulf leaders are now putting heavy pressure on Washington to dial back the escalation before their own economies and critical infrastructure suffer even greater damage. And then there's the question Washington still hasn't convincingly answered: What does victory actually look like? America is measuring success by how much damage it can inflict. Iran is measuring success by whether it can still fight tomorrow. Andreas believes only one of those strategies has a believable path to victory. Brandon Weichert Dr Andreas Krieg

Mario Nawfal

257,296 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Seyed Mohammad Marandi said the current confrontation marks a turning point in the regional balance of power, in an interview for Al Mayadeen, arguing that #Iran will no longer accept a status quo in which the United States and "Israel" can threaten it from military bases across the region. According to Marandi, Tehran aims to push the war until Washington and its Western allies recognize that attacking Iran is no longer an option. He also argues that the war could force broader regional changes, including a challenge to #Gulf states hosting #US bases and a shift in power favoring the Axis of Resistance. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #USBases #WarOnIran
2:04

Seyed Mohammad Marandi said the current confrontation marks a turning point in the regional balance of power, in an interview for Al Mayadeen, arguing that #Iran will no longer accept a status quo in which the United States and "Israel" can threaten it from military bases across the region. According to Marandi, Tehran aims to push the war until Washington and its Western allies recognize that attacking Iran is no longer an option. He also argues that the war could force broader regional changes, including a challenge to #Gulf states hosting #US bases and a shift in power favoring the Axis of Resistance. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #USBases #WarOnIran

Al Mayadeen English

185,873 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

For the first time in history, the Arab Gulf states saw and recognized and made clear in public what they had been making clear in many instances in private, which is that there is only one evil destabilizing regime in the Middle East, and it's not the Jewish state. It's another Muslim country, an evil regime in Tehran that must be dealt with. And they, not just the UAE, but Saudi Arabian, Bahrain, and even Oman, are in talks with Israel to pipe oil away from the Strait of Hormuz, Bahrain, Kuwait as well, up to Israel, a revolutionary game changer that would change the face of the Middle East perhaps forever, linking Israel through oil and natural gas production in the Gulf states. And then you have what's happened in Lebanon and Syria. Inconceivable one year ago, let alone three or five years ago, that Israel invades Southern Lebanon and the government of Lebanon and the government of adjoining Syria, far from blaming Israel, blame only one party, Iran, for having destabilized their region.
1:42

For the first time in history, the Arab Gulf states saw and recognized and made clear in public what they had been making clear in many instances in private, which is that there is only one evil destabilizing regime in the Middle East, and it's not the Jewish state. It's another Muslim country, an evil regime in Tehran that must be dealt with. And they, not just the UAE, but Saudi Arabian, Bahrain, and even Oman, are in talks with Israel to pipe oil away from the Strait of Hormuz, Bahrain, Kuwait as well, up to Israel, a revolutionary game changer that would change the face of the Middle East perhaps forever, linking Israel through oil and natural gas production in the Gulf states. And then you have what's happened in Lebanon and Syria. Inconceivable one year ago, let alone three or five years ago, that Israel invades Southern Lebanon and the government of Lebanon and the government of adjoining Syria, far from blaming Israel, blame only one party, Iran, for having destabilized their region.

Roy K. Altman

45,426 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

They never want to 'liberate' Saudi or the UAE- only Iran 🇮🇷 Because 'liberation' is a Western foreign policy that has nothing to do with human rights and everything to do with power and obedience. Iran is independent. Iran isn’t economically captured. It hasn’t handed over its resources, security, or sovereignty to Western capital in the way Gulf monarchies have.
2:40

They never want to 'liberate' Saudi or the UAE- only Iran 🇮🇷 Because 'liberation' is a Western foreign policy that has nothing to do with human rights and everything to do with power and obedience. Iran is independent. Iran isn’t economically captured. It hasn’t handed over its resources, security, or sovereignty to Western capital in the way Gulf monarchies have.

Bushra Shaikh

91,845 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

In an interview with Al Mayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi described the war on Iran as a major miscalculation by the United States, arguing that Iran sees no benefit in a ceasefire at this stage. According to Marandi, Tehran believes that only sustained pressure will deter future attacks, warning that a ceasefire would give Washington and its allies time to regroup and strike again. Marandi also highlighted the broader consequences of the conflict, including rising energy prices and increasing international pressure on Washington. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #Iran #Tehran #UnitedStates #WarOnIran #Europe #Gulf #AlMayadeen
2:37

In an interview with Al Mayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi described the war on Iran as a major miscalculation by the United States, arguing that Iran sees no benefit in a ceasefire at this stage. According to Marandi, Tehran believes that only sustained pressure will deter future attacks, warning that a ceasefire would give Washington and its allies time to regroup and strike again. Marandi also highlighted the broader consequences of the conflict, including rising energy prices and increasing international pressure on Washington. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #Iran #Tehran #UnitedStates #WarOnIran #Europe #Gulf #AlMayadeen

Al Mayadeen English

24,929 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

JUST IN⚡️- The U.S. has announced the deployment of the USS Ford aircraft carrier strike group to Europe. This means that three U.S. aircraft carriers along with one British carrier will be positioned near Israel and Iran. The concentration of allied firepower in the region will be significant. It is clear that Trump has given the green light for a war against Iran. The US also believes that Iran might have the capability to hit an aircraft carrier with a missile, and it is taking steps to prepare for such a scenario.
2:26

JUST IN⚡️- The U.S. has announced the deployment of the USS Ford aircraft carrier strike group to Europe. This means that three U.S. aircraft carriers along with one British carrier will be positioned near Israel and Iran. The concentration of allied firepower in the region will be significant. It is clear that Trump has given the green light for a war against Iran. The US also believes that Iran might have the capability to hit an aircraft carrier with a missile, and it is taking steps to prepare for such a scenario.

Global Strategy

2,438,546 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump threatened to unleash the “gates of hell” against Iran, then he backed away, which in Washington may have been seen as restraint. According to Geopolitical analyst Pepe Escobar, Tehran interpreted it very differently. They saw it as proof that Iran’s deterrence had worked, America’s military options were narrowing, and that the longer Iran holds out, the more leverage it gains. Pepe says that transformed Iran’s objectives. Tehran is no longer thinking only about surviving the war, lifting sanctions or securing control over the Strait of Hormuz. According to his sources, forcing the U.S to retreat from West Asia has now become a central strategic goal. Iran began this conflict trying to prevent America from imposing its will. Pepe believes it now sees an opportunity to dismantle the military system that allowed Washington to threaten it in the first place. And Tehran reportedly believes it has found the mechanism. He says Iran has replaced its previous proportional retaliation policy with a new warning: Strike one Iranian energy target, and Iran will strike ten targets across America’s regional network. The message to Gulf governments is brutal. If they help Trump attack Iran, their refineries, pipelines and export facilities will pay the price. Pepe says that threat is one reason regional leaders pushed Trump to stand down. Saudi Arabia, in particular, understands that another major escalation could devastate the infrastructure it depends on to export oil. For decades, American bases were supposed to protect Gulf allies from Iran, but now those bases are putting the countries hosting them at risk. Pepe Escobar
34:45

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump threatened to unleash the “gates of hell” against Iran, then he backed away, which in Washington may have been seen as restraint. According to Geopolitical analyst Pepe Escobar, Tehran interpreted it very differently. They saw it as proof that Iran’s deterrence had worked, America’s military options were narrowing, and that the longer Iran holds out, the more leverage it gains. Pepe says that transformed Iran’s objectives. Tehran is no longer thinking only about surviving the war, lifting sanctions or securing control over the Strait of Hormuz. According to his sources, forcing the U.S to retreat from West Asia has now become a central strategic goal. Iran began this conflict trying to prevent America from imposing its will. Pepe believes it now sees an opportunity to dismantle the military system that allowed Washington to threaten it in the first place. And Tehran reportedly believes it has found the mechanism. He says Iran has replaced its previous proportional retaliation policy with a new warning: Strike one Iranian energy target, and Iran will strike ten targets across America’s regional network. The message to Gulf governments is brutal. If they help Trump attack Iran, their refineries, pipelines and export facilities will pay the price. Pepe says that threat is one reason regional leaders pushed Trump to stand down. Saudi Arabia, in particular, understands that another major escalation could devastate the infrastructure it depends on to export oil. For decades, American bases were supposed to protect Gulf allies from Iran, but now those bases are putting the countries hosting them at risk. Pepe Escobar

Mario Nawfal

286,832 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump says the U.S is going to “hit Iran hard,” while Tehran is warning that from now on, every American attack will be met with a response “dozens of times greater.” That's an extremely dangerous change in the rules of this war. The latest U.S strike was deliberately limited: American forces hit rocket launchers on Larak Island that CENTCOM says were preparing to deploy sea mines into the Strait of Hormuz. Iran didn't respond proportionally; it launched a much larger barrage of missiles and drones toward U.S positions in the region. And that's the part that matters. Earlier in the war, Iran largely calibrated its responses because it still believed there was a deal to be made with Washington. That calculation appears to be disappearing, because Tehran believes America no longer possesses the escalation dominance it had at the beginning of the war. And Iran is now willing to prove it by deliberately responding harder than it gets hit, meaning Trump now faces a brutal dilemma. If he doesn't respond after publicly promising to “hit them hard,” Tehran can portray it as proof that American threats have lost their force. But if he does hit Iran hard, Tehran is explicitly threatening to escalate even more, and warning that no target in the region is beyond its reach. The most dangerous assumption Trump could make now is that the U.S still gets to decide where the escalation ends. Iran's telling him it has a say in that. Brandon Weichert
56:52

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump says the U.S is going to “hit Iran hard,” while Tehran is warning that from now on, every American attack will be met with a response “dozens of times greater.” That's an extremely dangerous change in the rules of this war. The latest U.S strike was deliberately limited: American forces hit rocket launchers on Larak Island that CENTCOM says were preparing to deploy sea mines into the Strait of Hormuz. Iran didn't respond proportionally; it launched a much larger barrage of missiles and drones toward U.S positions in the region. And that's the part that matters. Earlier in the war, Iran largely calibrated its responses because it still believed there was a deal to be made with Washington. That calculation appears to be disappearing, because Tehran believes America no longer possesses the escalation dominance it had at the beginning of the war. And Iran is now willing to prove it by deliberately responding harder than it gets hit, meaning Trump now faces a brutal dilemma. If he doesn't respond after publicly promising to “hit them hard,” Tehran can portray it as proof that American threats have lost their force. But if he does hit Iran hard, Tehran is explicitly threatening to escalate even more, and warning that no target in the region is beyond its reach. The most dangerous assumption Trump could make now is that the U.S still gets to decide where the escalation ends. Iran's telling him it has a say in that. Brandon Weichert

Mario Nawfal

336,090 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Iran’s Attack on Qatar: A Symbolic Move That May Backfire. Iran’s strike on Qatar was symbolic and carefully telegraphed but it risks backfiring. Iran meant to send a warning to Gulf states not to support Israel or the US. But ironically, such actions justify the very reason the US has bases across the Gulf to deter Iran. Now Gulf countries, especially #Qatar, will demand stronger US guarantees for their security. This increases pressure on Washington to respond and reaffirms the US presence in the region.And trust me Trump isnt letting this sit in vault for now. Rather than weakening the US-Gulf alliance, Iran’s move may actually strengthen it, further isolating Tehran and hardening Gulf security postures. #IranIsraelConflict
6:59

Iran’s Attack on Qatar: A Symbolic Move That May Backfire. Iran’s strike on Qatar was symbolic and carefully telegraphed but it risks backfiring. Iran meant to send a warning to Gulf states not to support Israel or the US. But ironically, such actions justify the very reason the US has bases across the Gulf to deter Iran. Now Gulf countries, especially #Qatar, will demand stronger US guarantees for their security. This increases pressure on Washington to respond and reaffirms the US presence in the region.And trust me Trump isnt letting this sit in vault for now. Rather than weakening the US-Gulf alliance, Iran’s move may actually strengthen it, further isolating Tehran and hardening Gulf security postures. #IranIsraelConflict

Hafsa Malik

14,346 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Tehran University Professor Foad Izadi explains to me what Iranians are seeking in a post-war region He says Iran will never be a friend of the UAE as long as Dubai is close to Israel. There is no path in which Iran does not charge a fee at the Strait of Hormuz. He believes U.S. military bases must leave the region. The Islamic Republic of Iran believes the U.S empire is overstretched, Israel’s days of dominance are coming to an end, the Gulf monarchies are divided, and the global order is fragmenting fast enough for Tehran to outlast all of them. فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi 00:07 China Quietly Accepted Iran’s Hormuz Toll Plan 02:55 Iran Says It Survived Full-Force U.S.-Israeli Attacks 04:50 Iran Refuses To Return To The Pre-War Status Quo 07:06 The Strait Of Hormuz Is No Longer Negotiable 08:24 Iran Says U.S. Ships Won’t Be Welcome In Hormuz 09:37 Iran Wants The World To Pay To Pass Through Hormuz 10:44 Iran Calls The U.S. Navy Pirates 12:03 Iran Says Hormuz Fees Could Last Forever 14:04 China And Russia Reportedly Agreed To Pay Iran 16:25 Iran Is No Longer Afraid Of War 21:11 The West Makes More Money From Middle East Oil Than The Gulf 25:24 Iran Wants To End American Influence In The Middle East 31:36 Iran Warns Gulf States Over Israel Ties 34:48 Iran Vows To Make The UAE ‘Israel-Free’
44:16

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Tehran University Professor Foad Izadi explains to me what Iranians are seeking in a post-war region He says Iran will never be a friend of the UAE as long as Dubai is close to Israel. There is no path in which Iran does not charge a fee at the Strait of Hormuz. He believes U.S. military bases must leave the region. The Islamic Republic of Iran believes the U.S empire is overstretched, Israel’s days of dominance are coming to an end, the Gulf monarchies are divided, and the global order is fragmenting fast enough for Tehran to outlast all of them. فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi 00:07 China Quietly Accepted Iran’s Hormuz Toll Plan 02:55 Iran Says It Survived Full-Force U.S.-Israeli Attacks 04:50 Iran Refuses To Return To The Pre-War Status Quo 07:06 The Strait Of Hormuz Is No Longer Negotiable 08:24 Iran Says U.S. Ships Won’t Be Welcome In Hormuz 09:37 Iran Wants The World To Pay To Pass Through Hormuz 10:44 Iran Calls The U.S. Navy Pirates 12:03 Iran Says Hormuz Fees Could Last Forever 14:04 China And Russia Reportedly Agreed To Pay Iran 16:25 Iran Is No Longer Afraid Of War 21:11 The West Makes More Money From Middle East Oil Than The Gulf 25:24 Iran Wants To End American Influence In The Middle East 31:36 Iran Warns Gulf States Over Israel Ties 34:48 Iran Vows To Make The UAE ‘Israel-Free’

Mario Nawfal

404,925 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

"Iran has crossed red line after red line. The tone and mood in Gulf capitals has tangibly changed as more offensive courses of action are being weighed up to establish some semblance of a balance of deterrence. The question is just what can they achieve that Israel and the US are failing to achieve? And is it worth the long-term cost of having to coexist with Iran long after the Americans and Israelis are gone. Ultimately, the Gulf states know that it will be diplomacy that will lead out of this conflict."
11:02

"Iran has crossed red line after red line. The tone and mood in Gulf capitals has tangibly changed as more offensive courses of action are being weighed up to establish some semblance of a balance of deterrence. The question is just what can they achieve that Israel and the US are failing to achieve? And is it worth the long-term cost of having to coexist with Iran long after the Americans and Israelis are gone. Ultimately, the Gulf states know that it will be diplomacy that will lead out of this conflict."

Dr Andreas Krieg

14,487 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

For decades, Gulf countries built their security doctrine on one assumption: American military protection is the ultimate insurance policy. But this war with Iran is exposing the brutal reality that Washington’s priority is Israeli security, not Gulf security, and the U.S. footprint in the Gulf is a magnet. Those bases were not “neutral.” They were used for years as staging grounds for planning, surveillance, logistics, and operations aimed at Iran. And once you use a host country’s territory as a launchpad, you turn that country into a front line whether it wants it or not. So the paradox for the GCC is that the very bases meant to protect them are what can pull them into retaliation, because Iran won’t separate the aircraft from the runway, or the missile from the base that enabled it. The Gulf is learning, the hard way, that outsourced security can become imported war.
8:10

For decades, Gulf countries built their security doctrine on one assumption: American military protection is the ultimate insurance policy. But this war with Iran is exposing the brutal reality that Washington’s priority is Israeli security, not Gulf security, and the U.S. footprint in the Gulf is a magnet. Those bases were not “neutral.” They were used for years as staging grounds for planning, surveillance, logistics, and operations aimed at Iran. And once you use a host country’s territory as a launchpad, you turn that country into a front line whether it wants it or not. So the paradox for the GCC is that the very bases meant to protect them are what can pull them into retaliation, because Iran won’t separate the aircraft from the runway, or the missile from the base that enabled it. The Gulf is learning, the hard way, that outsourced security can become imported war.

Kevork Almassian

45,071 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

“This war has given [Iran] a lot more power in the region… and not just in the region because so much of the world depends on energy from the Strait of Hormuz and the Persian Gulf, they are kind of becoming a global power in a way that they were not before this war. And we have the same government in—a more radicalized version of it—with more support.” Antiwar news editor Dave DeCamp warns that Iran is becoming a global power due to its ability to control the Strait of Hormuz—adding that the current regime in Tehran is now more radicalized while holding more domestic support following the death of Ayatollah Khamenei. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on OAN Live today!
1:14

“This war has given [Iran] a lot more power in the region… and not just in the region because so much of the world depends on energy from the Strait of Hormuz and the Persian Gulf, they are kind of becoming a global power in a way that they were not before this war. And we have the same government in—a more radicalized version of it—with more support.” Antiwar news editor Dave DeCamp warns that Iran is becoming a global power due to its ability to control the Strait of Hormuz—adding that the current regime in Tehran is now more radicalized while holding more domestic support following the death of Ayatollah Khamenei. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on OAN Live today!

One America News

94,665 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Sami Hamdi (Sami Hamdi سامي الهاشمي الحامدي) | Geopolitical Analyst | The International Interest: Iran demanded Lebanon be included in the ceasefire to protect Hezbollah. Israel, conversely, wants Hezbollah destroyed. The Gulf states share Israel's goal. They fear that if Iran successfully protects Hezbollah, it will embolden pro-Iran militias in Iraq and Yemen to attack the Gulf. This dynamic explains why the Lebanese government signed an agreement without a guaranteed Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon. If Israel withdraws & Hezbollah retakes control, it proves Iran successfully defends its allies against imperialism while other Arab states facilitate it. This optic is disastrous for the Gulf. Ultimately, both Israel and the Gulf states oppose the current MOU because it grants concessions to Iran and risks further Iranian expansion. Even a proposal for Turkish peacekeepers in southern Lebanon was firmly rejected by Israel and the Gulf, out of fear that Turkish forces would never leave.
2:52

Sami Hamdi (Sami Hamdi سامي الهاشمي الحامدي) | Geopolitical Analyst | The International Interest: Iran demanded Lebanon be included in the ceasefire to protect Hezbollah. Israel, conversely, wants Hezbollah destroyed. The Gulf states share Israel's goal. They fear that if Iran successfully protects Hezbollah, it will embolden pro-Iran militias in Iraq and Yemen to attack the Gulf. This dynamic explains why the Lebanese government signed an agreement without a guaranteed Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon. If Israel withdraws & Hezbollah retakes control, it proves Iran successfully defends its allies against imperialism while other Arab states facilitate it. This optic is disastrous for the Gulf. Ultimately, both Israel and the Gulf states oppose the current MOU because it grants concessions to Iran and risks further Iranian expansion. Even a proposal for Turkish peacekeepers in southern Lebanon was firmly rejected by Israel and the Gulf, out of fear that Turkish forces would never leave.

Clash Report

22,850 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

NEW: 🇮🇱🇸🇦 Israel wants to control the oil from Saudi Arabia, the Gulf countries with a pipeline directly to Europe says Israeli Minister of Energy Eli Cohen: “If you look at the map, you'll see that ground infrastructure can be laid from the Gulf states all the way to the Mediterranean — and from the Mediterranean, it can flow to Europe. This is a very big interest for the Saudis, because the Saudis understand oil is their main source of income. The last war shows that you need not only a source of energy but also a route to export it. I estimate that in a few years, if a confrontation breaks out in our region, the Straits of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb will no longer be able to be a threat or a card for Iran. I estimate four to five years for the alternative to be ready.” Iran can actually stop this with a couple of drones…
1:20

NEW: 🇮🇱🇸🇦 Israel wants to control the oil from Saudi Arabia, the Gulf countries with a pipeline directly to Europe says Israeli Minister of Energy Eli Cohen: “If you look at the map, you'll see that ground infrastructure can be laid from the Gulf states all the way to the Mediterranean — and from the Mediterranean, it can flow to Europe. This is a very big interest for the Saudis, because the Saudis understand oil is their main source of income. The last war shows that you need not only a source of energy but also a route to export it. I estimate that in a few years, if a confrontation breaks out in our region, the Straits of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb will no longer be able to be a threat or a card for Iran. I estimate four to five years for the alternative to be ready.” Iran can actually stop this with a couple of drones…

Megatron

101,652 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

President Trump said today that the United States was not interested in a cease-fire with Iran because, from a military standpoint, he said Iran was "finished." And late today, Trump said on Truth Social: "We are getting very close to meeting our objectives as we consider winding down our great military efforts in the Middle East with respect to the terrorist regime of Iran." Meanwhile, Israel and the United States continued to attack Iran today, hitting the same kinds of targets they've struck throughout this campaign. And Iran continued to strike back, with missiles and drones landing in Israel and on oil and gas facilities across the Persian Gulf. White House correspondent Liz Landers reports.
5:45

President Trump said today that the United States was not interested in a cease-fire with Iran because, from a military standpoint, he said Iran was "finished." And late today, Trump said on Truth Social: "We are getting very close to meeting our objectives as we consider winding down our great military efforts in the Middle East with respect to the terrorist regime of Iran." Meanwhile, Israel and the United States continued to attack Iran today, hitting the same kinds of targets they've struck throughout this campaign. And Iran continued to strike back, with missiles and drones landing in Israel and on oil and gas facilities across the Persian Gulf. White House correspondent Liz Landers reports.

PBS News

37,963 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Washington may call it economic pressure. Tehran may call it war. Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson says Iran could respond to a U.S. economic campaign the same way it would respond to a military attack, particularly if countries help enforce it. The logic is pretty straightforward: if allowing your airbases to be used against Iran makes you a target, why should allowing your banks and financial system to be used against Iran be any different? Johnson's answer is that it shouldn't. And that puts the UAE in an uncomfortable position. But Gulf states have already realised Washington is not the security guarantee it once appeared to be and are quietly repairing relations with Tehran. The fact that the UAE has avoided another round of strikes is hardly irrelevant. Then there is the bigger problem with the sanctions strategy. China is refusing to play along. Pakistan is hardly going to abandon Iranian energy to keep Washington happy. Iranian oil is increasingly being settled in yuan, outside the U.S. financial system. The irony is becoming difficult to miss. The harder Washington squeezes Iran, the more Tehran's biggest partners have an incentive to build ways around Washington. 10 years ago, Russia and China helped enforce the sanctions regime. Today, they are helping Iran survive it. Meanwhile the rial has collapsed, Iran is restricting shipping through the Strait, and Tehran has reportedly been discussed for a regional defence pact involving Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Washington is promising the most devastating sanctions yet. Johnson's response? "I'll hold my breath." SonofNewAmericanRevolution
41:31

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Washington may call it economic pressure. Tehran may call it war. Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson says Iran could respond to a U.S. economic campaign the same way it would respond to a military attack, particularly if countries help enforce it. The logic is pretty straightforward: if allowing your airbases to be used against Iran makes you a target, why should allowing your banks and financial system to be used against Iran be any different? Johnson's answer is that it shouldn't. And that puts the UAE in an uncomfortable position. But Gulf states have already realised Washington is not the security guarantee it once appeared to be and are quietly repairing relations with Tehran. The fact that the UAE has avoided another round of strikes is hardly irrelevant. Then there is the bigger problem with the sanctions strategy. China is refusing to play along. Pakistan is hardly going to abandon Iranian energy to keep Washington happy. Iranian oil is increasingly being settled in yuan, outside the U.S. financial system. The irony is becoming difficult to miss. The harder Washington squeezes Iran, the more Tehran's biggest partners have an incentive to build ways around Washington. 10 years ago, Russia and China helped enforce the sanctions regime. Today, they are helping Iran survive it. Meanwhile the rial has collapsed, Iran is restricting shipping through the Strait, and Tehran has reportedly been discussed for a regional defence pact involving Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Washington is promising the most devastating sanctions yet. Johnson's response? "I'll hold my breath." SonofNewAmericanRevolution

Mario Nawfal

308,654 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen