Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

AN ANTHROPIC SYSTEM TURNS ONE PROMPT INTO A COMPLETE GRAPH MODEL BUILT ENTIRELY ON ITS OWN One prompt is enough to spin up the full architecture, no schema written by hand, no roles assigned in advance. Parallel workers process every branch of the graph at once, each one handling...

0xWast3's profile picture

wast3

5,110 subscribers

18,460 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

AN ENGINEER SOLVED A PROBLEM NOBODY IN THE COMPANY COULD FULLY MAP ON THEIR OWN The problem wasn't a missing tool, it was that every process touched three other processes nobody had written down. He wired dozens of agents into one shared graph instead of documenting each department's workflow by hand. Each agent owned one process, reading its own logs while writing every dependency it found straight into the shared structure. Within days, the graph surfaced a connection between two departments that had been quietly blocking each other for over a year. The company adopted the graph as its live map of operations, and it hasn't stopped finding new connections since. See what the graph found in the first 48 hours below👇
0:14

AN ENGINEER SOLVED A PROBLEM NOBODY IN THE COMPANY COULD FULLY MAP ON THEIR OWN The problem wasn't a missing tool, it was that every process touched three other processes nobody had written down. He wired dozens of agents into one shared graph instead of documenting each department's workflow by hand. Each agent owned one process, reading its own logs while writing every dependency it found straight into the shared structure. Within days, the graph surfaced a connection between two departments that had been quietly blocking each other for over a year. The company adopted the graph as its live map of operations, and it hasn't stopped finding new connections since. See what the graph found in the first 48 hours below👇

wast3

16,489 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

THAT'S CRAZY, THIS CHINESE FOUNDER BUILT A MASSIVE MAC MINI FARM AND EACH ONE RUNNING ITS OWN HERMES AI AGENT LIKE A FULL-TIME EMPLOYEE He's not running one AI assistant. He's running an entire workforce. The stack: Mac Mini + Hermes, scaled out across a full physical farm. Every single Mac Mini in the rack runs its own instance of Hermes Agent – and each one has its own dedicated job. Not duplicated tasks. Actual division of labor, machine by machine, the way you'd structure a real team. No salaries. No sick days. No onboarding. Just racks of hardware, each one handling its own piece of the business, running in parallel, 24/7. This is what it looks like when "AI agent" stops being one chatbot on your laptop and starts being an actual operation. Most people are running one AI tool. This guy built a company out of them. Bookmark this post. Full setup in the video below.
0:14

THAT'S CRAZY, THIS CHINESE FOUNDER BUILT A MASSIVE MAC MINI FARM AND EACH ONE RUNNING ITS OWN HERMES AI AGENT LIKE A FULL-TIME EMPLOYEE He's not running one AI assistant. He's running an entire workforce. The stack: Mac Mini + Hermes, scaled out across a full physical farm. Every single Mac Mini in the rack runs its own instance of Hermes Agent – and each one has its own dedicated job. Not duplicated tasks. Actual division of labor, machine by machine, the way you'd structure a real team. No salaries. No sick days. No onboarding. Just racks of hardware, each one handling its own piece of the business, running in parallel, 24/7. This is what it looks like when "AI agent" stops being one chatbot on your laptop and starts being an actual operation. Most people are running one AI tool. This guy built a company out of them. Bookmark this post. Full setup in the video below.

SCOTTY BEAM

20,503 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

CLAUDE + SEEDANCE 2.5 CAN REBUILD A VIRAL VIDEO FROM ITS FRAMES IN ONE CONVERSATION (as, for example, with this whale) Did you notice the difference? Prompt in the comments Made with Seedance 2.5 on MakeUGC ▪ STEP ONE: split the original into frames. Claude pulls one frame per second from the source video and reads each one, so the clip becomes a timeline: leap, strike, swallow, giant, final shot. ▪ STEP TWO: Claude writes the prompt in blocks - subjects, location with real numbers, camera, second-by-second timeline, natural sound, continuity - and swaps the cold grey look for warm golden-hour light. ▪ STEP THREE: five of the original frames go into Seedance 2.5 as reference images, in order, each one mapped to its own seconds in the timeline. The point: the structure of the original survives, the look changes, and every swallow is pinned to a real reference shape. 🔖Save this to try later.
0:13

CLAUDE + SEEDANCE 2.5 CAN REBUILD A VIRAL VIDEO FROM ITS FRAMES IN ONE CONVERSATION (as, for example, with this whale) Did you notice the difference? Prompt in the comments Made with Seedance 2.5 on MakeUGC ▪ STEP ONE: split the original into frames. Claude pulls one frame per second from the source video and reads each one, so the clip becomes a timeline: leap, strike, swallow, giant, final shot. ▪ STEP TWO: Claude writes the prompt in blocks - subjects, location with real numbers, camera, second-by-second timeline, natural sound, continuity - and swaps the cold grey look for warm golden-hour light. ▪ STEP THREE: five of the original frames go into Seedance 2.5 as reference images, in order, each one mapped to its own seconds in the timeline. The point: the structure of the original survives, the look changes, and every swallow is pinned to a real reference shape. 🔖Save this to try later.

Zentrix⌚️

12,474 просмотров • 14 дней назад

A Closer Look at Alchemist AI v3.5🔎 In v1, one agent handled everything. You’d enter a prompt like “make a snake game” and get a single block of code—one input, one output. v2 introduced multiple agents with specialized roles: prompt refinement, frontend, backend, and review. It brought more structure, but the process was still linear. Each step produced a single output. With v3, a single agent could handle multiple tasks. It generated HTML, CSS, JavaScript, searched for assets, and more—all in one go, while maintaining full context. Now in v3.5, we combine both models. Multiple agents work in parallel, each capable of producing multiple outputs at once. The prompt compiler adapts based on what you're building. A 3D game? It prioritizes game engines, rendering, and mechanics. A website or 2D app? It shifts focus to relevant frameworks and tools. The tool handler can call several services simultaneously, feeding context-aware data into the code generator for real-time execution. From single-output generation to parallel, adaptive workflows. In the next breakdown, we’ll dive into the architecture behind our proprietary engine in v3.5.
0:11

A Closer Look at Alchemist AI v3.5🔎 In v1, one agent handled everything. You’d enter a prompt like “make a snake game” and get a single block of code—one input, one output. v2 introduced multiple agents with specialized roles: prompt refinement, frontend, backend, and review. It brought more structure, but the process was still linear. Each step produced a single output. With v3, a single agent could handle multiple tasks. It generated HTML, CSS, JavaScript, searched for assets, and more—all in one go, while maintaining full context. Now in v3.5, we combine both models. Multiple agents work in parallel, each capable of producing multiple outputs at once. The prompt compiler adapts based on what you're building. A 3D game? It prioritizes game engines, rendering, and mechanics. A website or 2D app? It shifts focus to relevant frameworks and tools. The tool handler can call several services simultaneously, feeding context-aware data into the code generator for real-time execution. From single-output generation to parallel, adaptive workflows. In the next breakdown, we’ll dive into the architecture behind our proprietary engine in v3.5.

ALCHEMIST AI 🔮

12,706 просмотров • 1 год назад

i just open sourced the workflow behind $2M AI video productions... i built 7 skills that run the pipeline end to end, built for Seedance 2.5 and they work in Claude Code, Codex, Hermes or any harness (works best with 1080p using Higgsfield CLI) here's how to use them, in order: /setup writes which image and video models you run into your project, once, so every skill reads the same stack /studio-init scaffolds the whole studio as a file tree from one question, the project name /film-breakdown walks your script scene by scene and writes a 22-field card for every shot /reference-board locks your references into a visual bible, a caption on every image and a ban list for the rest /asset-passport writes the exhaustive descriptor every later prompt will quote word for word /stress-test combat-tests each asset and flips it to locked only at 10 out of 10 repeatability /shot-prompt refuses to run until everything in frame is locked, then writes the 15-block prompt and logs every attempt get access to the skills and full breakdown of the pipeline in the article below:
0:12

i just open sourced the workflow behind $2M AI video productions... i built 7 skills that run the pipeline end to end, built for Seedance 2.5 and they work in Claude Code, Codex, Hermes or any harness (works best with 1080p using Higgsfield CLI) here's how to use them, in order: /setup writes which image and video models you run into your project, once, so every skill reads the same stack /studio-init scaffolds the whole studio as a file tree from one question, the project name /film-breakdown walks your script scene by scene and writes a 22-field card for every shot /reference-board locks your references into a visual bible, a caption on every image and a ban list for the rest /asset-passport writes the exhaustive descriptor every later prompt will quote word for word /stress-test combat-tests each asset and flips it to locked only at 10 out of 10 repeatability /shot-prompt refuses to run until everything in frame is locked, then writes the 15-block prompt and logs every attempt get access to the skills and full breakdown of the pipeline in the article below:

Machina

61,554 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

AMAZON SENIOR DEVELOPER BUILT A CONTEXT PIPELINE THAT DECIDES WHAT THE MODEL EVEN GETS TO SEE Most teams still dump the entire codebase into every prompt and hope it sorts itself out. He ranked every file by relevance to the task instead of how recently it was touched. A router decides how much context each task earns, a typo fix pulls three files, a full rewrite pulls the whole module. Whatever survives gets compressed to the exact lines that actually matter, so nothing bloats the window with dead weight. Token cost per finished task dropped the moment the model stopped reading dead weight just to fix one function. See how the four stages work together below👇
0:16

AMAZON SENIOR DEVELOPER BUILT A CONTEXT PIPELINE THAT DECIDES WHAT THE MODEL EVEN GETS TO SEE Most teams still dump the entire codebase into every prompt and hope it sorts itself out. He ranked every file by relevance to the task instead of how recently it was touched. A router decides how much context each task earns, a typo fix pulls three files, a full rewrite pulls the whole module. Whatever survives gets compressed to the exact lines that actually matter, so nothing bloats the window with dead weight. Token cost per finished task dropped the moment the model stopped reading dead weight just to fix one function. See how the four stages work together below👇

wast3

24,029 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

youtube is paying $8,217 a month to a channel with zero humans. no face. just 6 AI tools publishing anime on autopilot twice a week and youtube has no idea the algorithm doesn't check who made the video. it checks one number: how long people keep watching that's the entire game an 8-hour lofi anime stream plays on loop. one upload turns into hundreds of hours of watchtime every month at $3-8 RPM that's $2,400-6,400 from a single file the pipeline runs itself claude writes the script. midjourney draws the frames. runway animates. elevenlabs voices it. suno writes the soundtrack. assembles and publishes humans in the process: zero from prompt to a finished 12-minute episode: 2 hours. from episode to youtube: zero one channel. $8,217 last month article below - every prompt for every step most people ask "will AI take my job". better question - why are you still trading hours for money when a pipeline trades prompts for watchtime
0:10

youtube is paying $8,217 a month to a channel with zero humans. no face. just 6 AI tools publishing anime on autopilot twice a week and youtube has no idea the algorithm doesn't check who made the video. it checks one number: how long people keep watching that's the entire game an 8-hour lofi anime stream plays on loop. one upload turns into hundreds of hours of watchtime every month at $3-8 RPM that's $2,400-6,400 from a single file the pipeline runs itself claude writes the script. midjourney draws the frames. runway animates. elevenlabs voices it. suno writes the soundtrack. assembles and publishes humans in the process: zero from prompt to a finished 12-minute episode: 2 hours. from episode to youtube: zero one channel. $8,217 last month article below - every prompt for every step most people ask "will AI take my job". better question - why are you still trading hours for money when a pipeline trades prompts for watchtime

Ventry

118,921 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

this is f**king dangerous someone figured out how to make Opus 4.8 run on Fable 5's brain with one prompt access to the best model is never guaranteed. It disappeared once already this year. but you can use it forever. here's how: 1. ask Fable 5: "write the operating manual your replacement will run on" (procedures, failure modes, a 5-question self-test) 2. save the output as one .md file and drop it into a new Claude Project as the project instructions 3. switch to Opus 4.8 and now your everyday model runs off the smart one's method, no top-tier price save and bookmark this no matter what full extraction prompt is in the article below: ↓
0:18

this is f**king dangerous someone figured out how to make Opus 4.8 run on Fable 5's brain with one prompt access to the best model is never guaranteed. It disappeared once already this year. but you can use it forever. here's how: 1. ask Fable 5: "write the operating manual your replacement will run on" (procedures, failure modes, a 5-question self-test) 2. save the output as one .md file and drop it into a new Claude Project as the project instructions 3. switch to Opus 4.8 and now your everyday model runs off the smart one's method, no top-tier price save and bookmark this no matter what full extraction prompt is in the article below: ↓

Hamza Khalid

32,581 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

34,547 ELEMENTS. 34 WARNINGS. 7 DUPLICATE ELEMENTS REVIT'S OWN SCHEDULE NEVER CAUGHT. One prompt, one live Revit model, one Claude session through the MCP connection. No plugins, no exported schedules to reformat by hand. Claude walked the model tree: rooms, families, sheets, every open warning, cross-checked counts against each other, and came back with a full audit. Top flag: three fire-rated doors modeled without a fire rating parameter. The rest ranked below it, from code-adjacent to cosmetic. Still the read-only side of Revit's official MCP server, the part Autodesk shipped first, on purpose. Write access is on their own roadmap, through a separate server built specifically for it. Nothing here moved a single element. The model just got properly looked at, faster than a manual QA pass usually runs.
0:19

34,547 ELEMENTS. 34 WARNINGS. 7 DUPLICATE ELEMENTS REVIT'S OWN SCHEDULE NEVER CAUGHT. One prompt, one live Revit model, one Claude session through the MCP connection. No plugins, no exported schedules to reformat by hand. Claude walked the model tree: rooms, families, sheets, every open warning, cross-checked counts against each other, and came back with a full audit. Top flag: three fire-rated doors modeled without a fire rating parameter. The rest ranked below it, from code-adjacent to cosmetic. Still the read-only side of Revit's official MCP server, the part Autodesk shipped first, on purpose. Write access is on their own roadmap, through a separate server built specifically for it. Nothing here moved a single element. The model just got properly looked at, faster than a manual QA pass usually runs.

Solvaix

28,689 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

THIS 38,000-STAR GITHUB REPO TURNS ONE AI AGENT INTO A REAL TEAM THAT CAN BRANCH, VERIFY ITS WORK AND WAIT FOR YOUR APPROVAL most people still run agents as one long chain where every step waits, one failure kills the run and the full workflow starts again Task → Planner → 5 Researchers in Parallel → Skeptic → Writer → Human Gate LangGraph gives every node one job while a shared state carries the findings, decisions and context through the entire system the skeptic can reject an unsupported finding and route the work back before it contaminates the final report, while independent branches keep moving if the run crashes, durable execution resumes from the saved state instead of rebuilding everything, then human-in-the-loop pauses the graph before anything expensive gets sent or published bookmark this repo and watch one prompt turn into an actual org chart for AI agents
0:14

THIS 38,000-STAR GITHUB REPO TURNS ONE AI AGENT INTO A REAL TEAM THAT CAN BRANCH, VERIFY ITS WORK AND WAIT FOR YOUR APPROVAL most people still run agents as one long chain where every step waits, one failure kills the run and the full workflow starts again Task → Planner → 5 Researchers in Parallel → Skeptic → Writer → Human Gate LangGraph gives every node one job while a shared state carries the findings, decisions and context through the entire system the skeptic can reject an unsupported finding and route the work back before it contaminates the final report, while independent branches keep moving if the run crashes, durable execution resumes from the saved state instead of rebuilding everything, then human-in-the-loop pauses the graph before anything expensive gets sent or published bookmark this repo and watch one prompt turn into an actual org chart for AI agents

Gipp 🦅

11,709 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

THIS GUY TURNS NOTES, DOCUMENTS, AND IDEAS INTO AN AI SECOND BRAIN the system stores all the context of your work and helps claude not forget anything how to build one yourself: install obsidian connect claude code keep your projects, notes, and sessions in one vault link similar ideas together use the graph to discover new connections as a result, claude gets memory of your projects and understands the context without you constantly having to explain everything the more you work, the smarter the system gets don’t collect notes build connections between them instead
0:16

THIS GUY TURNS NOTES, DOCUMENTS, AND IDEAS INTO AN AI SECOND BRAIN the system stores all the context of your work and helps claude not forget anything how to build one yourself: install obsidian connect claude code keep your projects, notes, and sessions in one vault link similar ideas together use the graph to discover new connections as a result, claude gets memory of your projects and understands the context without you constantly having to explain everything the more you work, the smarter the system gets don’t collect notes build connections between them instead

Marvin

24,954 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Lauren from the Grok Bot team just confirmed it: every bot now runs on Claude Opus 5.5 and each one can spin up its own cloud agents running Cursor’s models this is f*cking insane... so i built the harness on top of it, in one prompt: Opus 5.5 leads and builds, Grok scouts live X and the web, every claim needs two sources, a red team attacks the draft before you see it, and every run gets logged so the next one starts smarter you stop prompting models. you sign off on results. paste it into Grok Bot or Claude and thank me later all 10 steps, the workflow, and real examples below ↓
0:19

Lauren from the Grok Bot team just confirmed it: every bot now runs on Claude Opus 5.5 and each one can spin up its own cloud agents running Cursor’s models this is f*cking insane... so i built the harness on top of it, in one prompt: Opus 5.5 leads and builds, Grok scouts live X and the web, every claim needs two sources, a red team attacks the draft before you see it, and every run gets logged so the next one starts smarter you stop prompting models. you sign off on results. paste it into Grok Bot or Claude and thank me later all 10 steps, the workflow, and real examples below ↓

Alex

43,974 просмотров • 4 дней назад

FIVE LAYERS OF AGENT ENGINEERING, EACH ONE WRAPS THE ONE BELOW IT. IF YOU SKIP LAYER 2, YOUR LAYER 5 WILL LOOK BROKEN WHEN IT IS ACTUALLY JUST STANDING ON NOTHING. for weeks i debated harness vs loop vs graph like they were competing choices. then a stack diagram made the shape obvious. they are not choices. they are floors. 01 | prompt engineering. the message. unit of work: one input. inputs are role, instructions, examples, format. output is a single raw response. 02 | context engineering. the memory. unit of work: what stays in the window. a curator selects, compresses, and drops from query, docs, memory, prior turns, and tool outputs before the prompt runs. 03 | harness engineering. the machine. unit of work: the machine itself. gather (context + prompt) → LLM → tools or sub-agents → verifier → final response. the article calls this the operating environment. 04 | loop engineering. the system. unit of work: the run. goal + success criteria + max iterations + budget + completion check wrap around one harness pass. failed pass appends results to context and retries. 05 | graph engineering. the topology. unit of work: the graph run. goal + nodes + edges + state schema. graph routes to agent nodes, tool nodes, or human approval. a reviewer node with a different model and fresh context checks the final answer. the wrapping is the whole point. layer 5 assumes layer 4 works. layer 4 assumes layer 3 works. skip layer 2 and layer 3's verifier keeps failing without a clear reason. this is why swapping the model is a one-day project and swapping the stack is a quarter. the model is the commodity. the five layers around it are the engineering. full three-layer breakdown of the top of the stack (harness, loop, graph) in the post below.
0:20

FIVE LAYERS OF AGENT ENGINEERING, EACH ONE WRAPS THE ONE BELOW IT. IF YOU SKIP LAYER 2, YOUR LAYER 5 WILL LOOK BROKEN WHEN IT IS ACTUALLY JUST STANDING ON NOTHING. for weeks i debated harness vs loop vs graph like they were competing choices. then a stack diagram made the shape obvious. they are not choices. they are floors. 01 | prompt engineering. the message. unit of work: one input. inputs are role, instructions, examples, format. output is a single raw response. 02 | context engineering. the memory. unit of work: what stays in the window. a curator selects, compresses, and drops from query, docs, memory, prior turns, and tool outputs before the prompt runs. 03 | harness engineering. the machine. unit of work: the machine itself. gather (context + prompt) → LLM → tools or sub-agents → verifier → final response. the article calls this the operating environment. 04 | loop engineering. the system. unit of work: the run. goal + success criteria + max iterations + budget + completion check wrap around one harness pass. failed pass appends results to context and retries. 05 | graph engineering. the topology. unit of work: the graph run. goal + nodes + edges + state schema. graph routes to agent nodes, tool nodes, or human approval. a reviewer node with a different model and fresh context checks the final answer. the wrapping is the whole point. layer 5 assumes layer 4 works. layer 4 assumes layer 3 works. skip layer 2 and layer 3's verifier keeps failing without a clear reason. this is why swapping the model is a one-day project and swapping the stack is a quarter. the model is the commodity. the five layers around it are the engineering. full three-layer breakdown of the top of the stack (harness, loop, graph) in the post below.

kocer

31,198 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

19-year-old from china makes $9,000/month designing product sites and ships each one in an afternoon. here's his exact setup the whole thing runs on two tools that each do one job: > brief written by hand: 5 min > Moonchild builds the design system, then every screen from it: 20 min > MCP hands the design to Claude as real structure, not a screenshot: instant > Claude Code reads those exact tokens and builds the live app: 20 min > second Claude session reviews the build for drift: 10 min total: about an hour. screen five still matches screen one. no agency, no dev, no design team the trick is MCP. the design tool passes Claude the actual colors, components and layout, so it builds from the source instead of guessing from a picture. full pipeline, every prompt, in the article above.
0:12

19-year-old from china makes $9,000/month designing product sites and ships each one in an afternoon. here's his exact setup the whole thing runs on two tools that each do one job: > brief written by hand: 5 min > Moonchild builds the design system, then every screen from it: 20 min > MCP hands the design to Claude as real structure, not a screenshot: instant > Claude Code reads those exact tokens and builds the live app: 20 min > second Claude session reviews the build for drift: 10 min total: about an hour. screen five still matches screen one. no agency, no dev, no design team the trick is MCP. the design tool passes Claude the actual colors, components and layout, so it builds from the source instead of guessing from a picture. full pipeline, every prompt, in the article above.

Ridark

19,477 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

this is worth more than most five figure courses 16 claude agents audit an entire repo at once, a second fleet re-checks every finding on fresh context, and the whole thing runs off one diagram instead of a prompt i ran it against my own code and got back 11 endpoints where i never checked who was logged in, 3 of which the verifier threw out before they ever reached me this is Graph Engineering, the layer above prompting, and it runs on the agent you already pay for: - write your plan out, then ask one question at every "and then": does the next step actually read what the previous one produced - the seams that fail that question were never dependencies, so those jobs run at the same time - the arrows that survive are your real edges, and the longest chain of them is your floor that no number of agents shortens - want it faster, cut a false edge instead of adding a worker - fan the independent work out, one agent per item, no shared state between them - send every finding to a separate agent on fresh context, because a model recognises its own writing 73.5% of the time and grades it kinder once it does - make that verifier check a real signal like a passing test, never the worker's own word that it finished - shard the fleet across worktrees so parallel workers stop overwriting each other, one rule frozen into every worker: never git stash, never git reset - merge only what came back verified, into one report instead of twenty open chats the catch is the ceiling. at 95% independent work 16 agents return 9.14x rather than the 16 you would guess, and even 256 only reach 18.6x, because the merge and the verify stay serial however wide you fan coordination itself is free plain code and every agent underneath it is billed, so start at twenty files and widen once it works bookmark this, the whole method with all six ready-to-run graphs is written out in the article ↓
0:15

this is worth more than most five figure courses 16 claude agents audit an entire repo at once, a second fleet re-checks every finding on fresh context, and the whole thing runs off one diagram instead of a prompt i ran it against my own code and got back 11 endpoints where i never checked who was logged in, 3 of which the verifier threw out before they ever reached me this is Graph Engineering, the layer above prompting, and it runs on the agent you already pay for: - write your plan out, then ask one question at every "and then": does the next step actually read what the previous one produced - the seams that fail that question were never dependencies, so those jobs run at the same time - the arrows that survive are your real edges, and the longest chain of them is your floor that no number of agents shortens - want it faster, cut a false edge instead of adding a worker - fan the independent work out, one agent per item, no shared state between them - send every finding to a separate agent on fresh context, because a model recognises its own writing 73.5% of the time and grades it kinder once it does - make that verifier check a real signal like a passing test, never the worker's own word that it finished - shard the fleet across worktrees so parallel workers stop overwriting each other, one rule frozen into every worker: never git stash, never git reset - merge only what came back verified, into one report instead of twenty open chats the catch is the ceiling. at 95% independent work 16 agents return 9.14x rather than the 16 you would guess, and even 256 only reach 18.6x, because the merge and the verify stay serial however wide you fan coordination itself is free plain code and every agent underneath it is billed, so start at twenty files and widen once it works bookmark this, the whole method with all six ready-to-run graphs is written out in the article ↓

Argona

157,688 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Stop letting Seedance 2.5 improvise the transformed creature. Upload the result as its own reference Seedance 2.5 on MakeUGC . Prompt and the workflow👇: Here is my advice to you: When a character shows up at two sizes, a single picture isn't enough. The huge dragon and the baby end up with different colors, different horns, different eyes. The fix is to give every form its own reference and assign the roles in the very first line: "Use image 1 for the young woman's face, hair and outfit. Use image 2 for the adult dragon. Use image 3 for the baby dragon." Three images, three jobs, one sentence. Then tie the forms together in the continuity block: "The baby dragon has exactly the same pearl-white and pink color, amber slit-pupil eyes and pink-tipped crest as the adult dragon." The dragon that fills the room and the one that fits in two hands are still clearly the same animal. A dragon that shrinks is still one dragon. The prompt only has to say so.
0:15

Stop letting Seedance 2.5 improvise the transformed creature. Upload the result as its own reference Seedance 2.5 on MakeUGC . Prompt and the workflow👇: Here is my advice to you: When a character shows up at two sizes, a single picture isn't enough. The huge dragon and the baby end up with different colors, different horns, different eyes. The fix is to give every form its own reference and assign the roles in the very first line: "Use image 1 for the young woman's face, hair and outfit. Use image 2 for the adult dragon. Use image 3 for the baby dragon." Three images, three jobs, one sentence. Then tie the forms together in the continuity block: "The baby dragon has exactly the same pearl-white and pink color, amber slit-pupil eyes and pink-tipped crest as the adult dragon." The dragon that fills the room and the one that fits in two hands are still clearly the same animal. A dragon that shrinks is still one dragon. The prompt only has to say so.

Zentrix⌚️

48,120 просмотров • 3 дней назад

📖THE STEP MOST CREATORS SKIP IS WHY THEIR AI ANIMATION LOOKS INCONSISTENT Consistency across clips doesn't come from prompting — it comes from the reference image. The pipeline, step by step: ▪ Start with ChatGPT Image 2 — generate a full character design sheet first, not just a single frame. Multiple angles, expressions, and outfit variations in one image keeps the character consistent across every scene ▪ Build a storyboard inside ChatGPT Image 2 as well — define each shot, camera angle, action, and mood before touching Seedance at all. This is the step most people skip and it's the reason clips look disconnected ▪ Define a color palette and lighting mood early — golden afternoon light, soft warm tones, dramatic shadows. Lock those values and repeat them across every prompt ▪ Take each storyboard frame into Seedance 2.0 as the reference image — one frame becomes one clip ▪ Write the Seedance prompt around the character action, not the scene description. The scene is already in the image. The prompt handles motion, camera behavior, and timing ▪ Keep clip duration between 4-6 seconds per shot — shorter clips give more control over pacing and reduce motion drift on character faces ▪ Match camera movement type across consecutive clips — if one shot dollies in, the next should hold or pull back, not dolly again The consistency across these frames comes from the character design sheet, not from luck. Seedance reads the reference image and the prompt together — if the reference is detailed enough, the output stays on-model. This video was created by ALOKXMEHTA 📥 tomorrow: the exact ChatGPT Image 2 prompt structure used to generate a multi-angle character design sheet like this one 🔖One article covers the entire workflow — it is pinned below, do not scroll past it.
0:12

📖THE STEP MOST CREATORS SKIP IS WHY THEIR AI ANIMATION LOOKS INCONSISTENT Consistency across clips doesn't come from prompting — it comes from the reference image. The pipeline, step by step: ▪ Start with ChatGPT Image 2 — generate a full character design sheet first, not just a single frame. Multiple angles, expressions, and outfit variations in one image keeps the character consistent across every scene ▪ Build a storyboard inside ChatGPT Image 2 as well — define each shot, camera angle, action, and mood before touching Seedance at all. This is the step most people skip and it's the reason clips look disconnected ▪ Define a color palette and lighting mood early — golden afternoon light, soft warm tones, dramatic shadows. Lock those values and repeat them across every prompt ▪ Take each storyboard frame into Seedance 2.0 as the reference image — one frame becomes one clip ▪ Write the Seedance prompt around the character action, not the scene description. The scene is already in the image. The prompt handles motion, camera behavior, and timing ▪ Keep clip duration between 4-6 seconds per shot — shorter clips give more control over pacing and reduce motion drift on character faces ▪ Match camera movement type across consecutive clips — if one shot dollies in, the next should hold or pull back, not dolly again The consistency across these frames comes from the character design sheet, not from luck. Seedance reads the reference image and the prompt together — if the reference is detailed enough, the output stays on-model. This video was created by ALOKXMEHTA 📥 tomorrow: the exact ChatGPT Image 2 prompt structure used to generate a multi-angle character design sheet like this one 🔖One article covers the entire workflow — it is pinned below, do not scroll past it.

Zentrix⌚️

14,015 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

this is f*cking gold engineers at Meta just deleted the most expensive part of multi-agent systems: instead of training a communication topology, they compile a fresh one for every query 20 agents went from 7 hours to 6 minutes. the problem everyone hits: 5 agents works. 20 agents turns into a group chat that answers slower than one model and costs more than the task is worth. ReActNet's fix is that the graph is written per query, not learned once: > an LLM controller reads the query and the agent roster > it compiles a sequence of directed graphs, one per reasoning stage > every edge carries a written instruction, e.g. "list boundary cases for this behavior" > each agent updates its state from its own previous state plus assigned neighbors > a final node aggregates all five states into the answer > no RL, no gradients, no training stage at all what that buys on gpt-4o: 92.75 average across 6 benchmarks, best on 5 of them. 100.00 on MultiArith. 92.74 pass@1 on HumanEval, +21 over a single model. and the number that should worry anyone running a swarm: at 20 agents GPTSwarm needs 412 minutes and $41.42. ReActNet needs 6.22 minutes and $6.53 and scores higher. the honest catch: more agents did not make it smarter. 5 agents scored 79.74, 20 scored 77.77. the topology was never the thing to learn.
0:18

this is f*cking gold engineers at Meta just deleted the most expensive part of multi-agent systems: instead of training a communication topology, they compile a fresh one for every query 20 agents went from 7 hours to 6 minutes. the problem everyone hits: 5 agents works. 20 agents turns into a group chat that answers slower than one model and costs more than the task is worth. ReActNet's fix is that the graph is written per query, not learned once: > an LLM controller reads the query and the agent roster > it compiles a sequence of directed graphs, one per reasoning stage > every edge carries a written instruction, e.g. "list boundary cases for this behavior" > each agent updates its state from its own previous state plus assigned neighbors > a final node aggregates all five states into the answer > no RL, no gradients, no training stage at all what that buys on gpt-4o: 92.75 average across 6 benchmarks, best on 5 of them. 100.00 on MultiArith. 92.74 pass@1 on HumanEval, +21 over a single model. and the number that should worry anyone running a swarm: at 20 agents GPTSwarm needs 412 minutes and $41.42. ReActNet needs 6.22 minutes and $6.53 and scores higher. the honest catch: more agents did not make it smarter. 5 agents scored 79.74, 20 scored 77.77. the topology was never the thing to learn.

NO1ennn

27,780 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

YOUR OBSIDIAN VAULT READS ALL 2,000 NOTES TO ANSWER ONE QUESTION. THAT'S NOT A SECOND BRAIN. That's a hoarder with markdown files. Hundreds of thousands of tokens burned per answer, and it still grabs the wrong note half the time. A real second brain runs on a graph: a router, an index, nodes, edges. Fable 5 reads 2-3 files instead of the whole vault. Answer back in under a second. The graph view everyone screenshots in Obsidian is a poster. The index is the actual engine. Full 11-step build below, from raw vault to working graph 👇
0:18

YOUR OBSIDIAN VAULT READS ALL 2,000 NOTES TO ANSWER ONE QUESTION. THAT'S NOT A SECOND BRAIN. That's a hoarder with markdown files. Hundreds of thousands of tokens burned per answer, and it still grabs the wrong note half the time. A real second brain runs on a graph: a router, an index, nodes, edges. Fable 5 reads 2-3 files instead of the whole vault. Answer back in under a second. The graph view everyone screenshots in Obsidian is a poster. The index is the actual engine. Full 11-step build below, from raw vault to working graph 👇

unicode

53,046 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

OpenAI DOTS can take one idea from market research to first outreach and results while you SLEEP > Most people will open it, type one prompt and close the tab. That is the most EXPENSIVE way to use it. Here is the better way, you hand one dot an opportunity and it becomes the orchestrator. It splits the job between five specialists. One validates demand, one sets the offer and pricing, one builds the content, one handles distribution and outreach, and one tracks what worked. Each of them has its own cloud computer and its own browser. They log into your tools once and stay signed in, so your laptop can stay CLOSED. Reading, researching and drafting happen on their own. Anything that sends a message, spends money or overwrites a file stops and waits for your OK. You get a ping in Slack, tap approve, and the work picks back up. You can also set a clock, a morning routine pulls from your apps and drops one brief in Slack before you open your eyes. One objective in, a whole team working on it overnight. Full setup in the article ↓
0:19

OpenAI DOTS can take one idea from market research to first outreach and results while you SLEEP > Most people will open it, type one prompt and close the tab. That is the most EXPENSIVE way to use it. Here is the better way, you hand one dot an opportunity and it becomes the orchestrator. It splits the job between five specialists. One validates demand, one sets the offer and pricing, one builds the content, one handles distribution and outreach, and one tracks what worked. Each of them has its own cloud computer and its own browser. They log into your tools once and stay signed in, so your laptop can stay CLOSED. Reading, researching and drafting happen on their own. Anything that sends a message, spends money or overwrites a file stops and waits for your OK. You get a ping in Slack, tap approve, and the work picks back up. You can also set a clock, a morning routine pulls from your apps and drops one brief in Slack before you open your eyes. One objective in, a whole team working on it overnight. Full setup in the article ↓

slash1s

31,277 просмотров • 13 дней назад