Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🇺🇸 An indicator tracked since 1971 just flashed, and it's called a bear market with 67% accuracy. George Gammon walks through a little-known signal measuring the delta between the Dow Jones and the Nasdaq. The rule: when the two indices diverge by more than 5% within a 7-to-10 trading... day window, history gives a 67% statistical probability of a bear market. What the divergence usually captures is capital fleeing high-risk tech for risk-off positions, the same dynamic that showed up at the peak of the dot-com bubble. Now layer on what Gammon sees in the subprime space and the labor market, and the indicator stops looking like trivia. It's flagging an instability running through the entire economy. George Gammonshow more

Mario Nawfal

3,683,366 subscribers

55,538 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Finance News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇺🇸 An AI bubble, an endless Gulf war, margin debt at all-time highs, and private credit that's effectively subprime, all stacking at once. George Gammon runs through the pile-up and says ignoring it is the worst move you can make: "Burying your head in the sand like an ostrich is a very, very poor investment strategy." You don't have to know when it breaks. You just have to know it's coming. George Gammon

🇺🇸 An AI bubble, an endless Gulf war, margin debt at all-time highs, and private credit that's effectively subprime, all stacking at once. George Gammon runs through the pile-up and says ignoring it is the worst move you can make: "Burying your head in the sand like an ostrich is a very, very poor investment strategy." You don't have to know when it breaks. You just have to know it's coming. George Gammon

Mario Nawfal

52,777 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸 Can the U.S. dollar actually hyperinflate? Peter Schiff and George Gammon agree America has a serious monetary problem. They disagree sharply on how it ends. Gammon argues the dollar is fundamentally different from currencies that collapsed in Argentina or Weimar Germany because much of the global dollar supply is created through debt. “𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘥𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘴.” Schiff sees the opposite danger: foreigners lose confidence, dump U.S. assets and send dollars flooding back into an economy running enormous deficits and struggling to produce enough goods. Same dollar system. Two very different failure modes. Gammon sees contraction as the brake. Schiff sees returning dollars as the accelerant. George Gammon , Peter Schiff

🇺🇸 Can the U.S. dollar actually hyperinflate? Peter Schiff and George Gammon agree America has a serious monetary problem. They disagree sharply on how it ends. Gammon argues the dollar is fundamentally different from currencies that collapsed in Argentina or Weimar Germany because much of the global dollar supply is created through debt. “𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘥𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘴.” Schiff sees the opposite danger: foreigners lose confidence, dump U.S. assets and send dollars flooding back into an economy running enormous deficits and struggling to produce enough goods. Same dollar system. Two very different failure modes. Gammon sees contraction as the brake. Schiff sees returning dollars as the accelerant. George Gammon , Peter Schiff

Mario Nawfal

42,677 views • 3 days ago

🇺🇸🇷🇺 Seizing Russia's reserves turned America into a defaulted country, and every central bank understood it instantly. Economist Philip Pilkington says holding reserves at a central bank is a lending operation, so freezing them is a default on the claim: "The United States is a defaulted country now, and the world understands that." George Gammon pushes back on where anyone runs to instead, since Putin or Xi would freeze an account just as fast, and the one genuinely decentralized option isn't ready. "It's not even a flip phone. It's like a tin can and a string." George Gammon Philip Pilkington

🇺🇸🇷🇺 Seizing Russia's reserves turned America into a defaulted country, and every central bank understood it instantly. Economist Philip Pilkington says holding reserves at a central bank is a lending operation, so freezing them is a default on the claim: "The United States is a defaulted country now, and the world understands that." George Gammon pushes back on where anyone runs to instead, since Putin or Xi would freeze an account just as fast, and the one genuinely decentralized option isn't ready. "It's not even a flip phone. It's like a tin can and a string." George Gammon Philip Pilkington

Mario Nawfal

90,778 views • 27 days ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 George Gammon warns that an Iran-driven oil spike could turn existing cracks in the U.S. economy into a full-blown crisis. If oil hits $120–130, higher inflation expectations could push rates higher, making private-sector debt and massive AI infrastructure borrowing increasingly expensive. George says the real danger is duration: “If it stays at $120 for a month, okay. If it stays at $120 for 6 months, we got a big problem.” The result could be falling stocks, collapsing AI CapEx, and eventually a weaker labor market. George Gammon

🇺🇸🇮🇷 George Gammon warns that an Iran-driven oil spike could turn existing cracks in the U.S. economy into a full-blown crisis. If oil hits $120–130, higher inflation expectations could push rates higher, making private-sector debt and massive AI infrastructure borrowing increasingly expensive. George says the real danger is duration: “If it stays at $120 for a month, okay. If it stays at $120 for 6 months, we got a big problem.” The result could be falling stocks, collapsing AI CapEx, and eventually a weaker labor market. George Gammon

Mario Nawfal

56,131 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸🇨🇳 Oil prices are falling with supply this tight, and that should terrify you more than any war. George Gammon flips the standard read on the oil market. Everyone's obsessing over supply constraints, yet prices keep sliding, and to him that mismatch exposes something bigger: demand is rotting underneath. His explanation is a global economic slowdown already underway. The strongest evidence sits in China, where reduced purchasing points to cooling demand deep enough to swallow the supply concerns whole. Even the volatility around the US announcements on Iranian oil licenses hasn't changed the trajectory. The trend line, Gammon argues, keeps pointing at a world that simply needs less oil, because its economies are slowing down. George Gammon

🇺🇸🇨🇳 Oil prices are falling with supply this tight, and that should terrify you more than any war. George Gammon flips the standard read on the oil market. Everyone's obsessing over supply constraints, yet prices keep sliding, and to him that mismatch exposes something bigger: demand is rotting underneath. His explanation is a global economic slowdown already underway. The strongest evidence sits in China, where reduced purchasing points to cooling demand deep enough to swallow the supply concerns whole. Even the volatility around the US announcements on Iranian oil licenses hasn't changed the trajectory. The trend line, Gammon argues, keeps pointing at a world that simply needs less oil, because its economies are slowing down. George Gammon

Mario Nawfal

74,025 views • 2 months ago

🇨🇳🇺🇸 More Chinese cars are on the road in Colombia than American ones, and that settles nothing. Macro investor George Gammon uses it to question what beating China would even look like, since 30 to 40% of vehicles there are Chinese and it hasn't ended the automobile business for anyone else: "There's a difference between them winning and them having won." Two or three years out it could be Korea, India or the United States, which is why he treats the AI race as a journey rather than a destination anyone reaches. George Gammon

🇨🇳🇺🇸 More Chinese cars are on the road in Colombia than American ones, and that settles nothing. Macro investor George Gammon uses it to question what beating China would even look like, since 30 to 40% of vehicles there are Chinese and it hasn't ended the automobile business for anyone else: "There's a difference between them winning and them having won." Two or three years out it could be Korea, India or the United States, which is why he treats the AI race as a journey rather than a destination anyone reaches. George Gammon

Mario Nawfal

40,587 views • 19 days ago

.Nigam Arora sees the probability of a market correction as "quite high" amid three market manias: semiconductors, space, and options. He says investors should consider dynamic hedging in the face of a potential correction. He also outlines the technical trends to monitor in the S&P 500. For more market news, tune in at:

.Nigam Arora sees the probability of a market correction as "quite high" amid three market manias: semiconductors, space, and options. He says investors should consider dynamic hedging in the face of a potential correction. He also outlines the technical trends to monitor in the S&P 500. For more market news, tune in at:

Schwab Network

159,871 views • 3 months ago

🇺🇸 Oil is spiking like the 1970s but the economy underneath looks like 2008, and the latest inflation report just showed it George Gammon read the week's strangest number as a warning. Oil spiked, yet core inflation, the basket outside food and energy, came in flat, meaning families are covering the pump by cutting everything else. That is demand destruction arriving early. His frame is 2008. Oil hit $140 that summer, inflation jumped, and two months later rates sat at zero inside a deflationary bust. The deciding variable both times: whether banks kept lending. They are risk off now, and by his count 95 percent of recent lending growth is AI buildout spending and borrowed stock bets. Strip that out and credit falls off a cliff. The wild part? He cited a report from Korea's melt up: ONE IN 30 South Koreans, the count including toddlers and grandmothers, wiped out in margin calls. Private credit runs the same leverage stacking, marked at full value inside black boxes nobody can open. And the war just reached the market that does not do drama. Long term rates are climbing faster than short ones, plain English for the bond market pricing a longer war and stickier prices while stocks shrug. His verdict on the AI economics ran four words: "that dog don't hunt." George Gammon

🇺🇸 Oil is spiking like the 1970s but the economy underneath looks like 2008, and the latest inflation report just showed it George Gammon read the week's strangest number as a warning. Oil spiked, yet core inflation, the basket outside food and energy, came in flat, meaning families are covering the pump by cutting everything else. That is demand destruction arriving early. His frame is 2008. Oil hit $140 that summer, inflation jumped, and two months later rates sat at zero inside a deflationary bust. The deciding variable both times: whether banks kept lending. They are risk off now, and by his count 95 percent of recent lending growth is AI buildout spending and borrowed stock bets. Strip that out and credit falls off a cliff. The wild part? He cited a report from Korea's melt up: ONE IN 30 South Koreans, the count including toddlers and grandmothers, wiped out in margin calls. Private credit runs the same leverage stacking, marked at full value inside black boxes nobody can open. And the war just reached the market that does not do drama. Long term rates are climbing faster than short ones, plain English for the bond market pricing a longer war and stickier prices while stocks shrug. His verdict on the AI economics ran four words: "that dog don't hunt." George Gammon

Mario Nawfal

372,844 views • 1 month ago

"What's the difference between a money market fund and a stablecoin? If it's the same risk and I get interest in one but not the other, why would any agent choose the stablecoin?" Christopher on the question that could reshape the entire stablecoin market "If there's anything agents are awesome at, they almost over-optimize. In that world, do money markets win?" "I'm an agent. I want that interest to come to me, not go to the stablecoin issuer. What prevents that?" "Fundamentally, if it's the same risk and I get interest in one and I don't get the other, why would any agent go into the stablecoin space?"

"What's the difference between a money market fund and a stablecoin? If it's the same risk and I get interest in one but not the other, why would any agent choose the stablecoin?" Christopher on the question that could reshape the entire stablecoin market "If there's anything agents are awesome at, they almost over-optimize. In that world, do money markets win?" "I'm an agent. I want that interest to come to me, not go to the stablecoin issuer. What prevents that?" "Fundamentally, if it's the same risk and I get interest in one and I don't get the other, why would any agent go into the stablecoin space?"

Laura Shin

11,661 views • 3 months ago

Bitcoin is starting to print the same structure that marked the end of the last bear market. After the 2021 top, Bitcoin lost the 200 Week Moving Average. What followed was a brutal bear market. But here's what happened next... Price slowly built a rounded base beneath the 200 Week Moving Average. Everyone expected another leg lower. Instead, Bitcoin reclaimed the 200 Week Moving Average... And the next bull market began. Now look at 2026. Bitcoin has once again lost the 200 Week Moving Average. And it's beginning to build a very similar rounded base. The reclaim hasn't happened yet. But if history starts to repeat... That could be the signal the bear market is finally coming to an end.

Bitcoin is starting to print the same structure that marked the end of the last bear market. After the 2021 top, Bitcoin lost the 200 Week Moving Average. What followed was a brutal bear market. But here's what happened next... Price slowly built a rounded base beneath the 200 Week Moving Average. Everyone expected another leg lower. Instead, Bitcoin reclaimed the 200 Week Moving Average... And the next bull market began. Now look at 2026. Bitcoin has once again lost the 200 Week Moving Average. And it's beginning to build a very similar rounded base. The reclaim hasn't happened yet. But if history starts to repeat... That could be the signal the bear market is finally coming to an end.

Mister Crypto

22,509 views • 2 months ago

MOST IMPORTANT BITCOIN SIGNAL SINCE THE START OF THE BEAR MARKET JUST FLASHED. The weekly bullish $BTC divergence is confirmed. Price: lower lows. RSI: higher lows. The last time this fired, $BTC ran over 700% and confirmed the bear market bottom. It doesn't mean the exact low is in. A double divergence with lower prices is still possible. But this is the first major sign that momentum is shifting after months of pain. We are closing in.

MOST IMPORTANT BITCOIN SIGNAL SINCE THE START OF THE BEAR MARKET JUST FLASHED. The weekly bullish $BTC divergence is confirmed. Price: lower lows. RSI: higher lows. The last time this fired, $BTC ran over 700% and confirmed the bear market bottom. It doesn't mean the exact low is in. A double divergence with lower prices is still possible. But this is the first major sign that momentum is shifting after months of pain. We are closing in.

Crypto Rover

92,215 views • 3 months ago

🇺🇸 Bessent announced the Treasury buyback double-down, and yields erased the move within 24 hours. Macro investor George Gammon called it publicly and gave it a week. It took a day. His point is that long-term rates answer to growth and inflation expectations, and no announcement changes either one. The buybacks amount to selling short-term debt to buy long-term debt. On the sanctions, he's blunter still: "If sanctions would have worked, why didn't you do it before? It's just a total cop out, so they have a narrative to take into midterms." George Gammon

🇺🇸 Bessent announced the Treasury buyback double-down, and yields erased the move within 24 hours. Macro investor George Gammon called it publicly and gave it a week. It took a day. His point is that long-term rates answer to growth and inflation expectations, and no announcement changes either one. The buybacks amount to selling short-term debt to buy long-term debt. On the sanctions, he's blunter still: "If sanctions would have worked, why didn't you do it before? It's just a total cop out, so they have a narrative to take into midterms." George Gammon

Mario Nawfal

61,132 views • 19 days ago

With the help of Claude, I developed an innovative approach to analyzing market volatility and earned $9,670 in 21 days. The model views volatility not as a static indicator, but as a dynamic process of interaction between two forces: > Trend-reinforcing pressure: Pressure reinforcing the current trend. > Mean-reverting pressure: Forces stabilizing the market and returning the price to average values. The mathematical core of the model: V = P(+) - P(-) Key advantages: > Tracking the accumulation of pressure > Risk adaptability > Uniqueness This is not just a theory: it is a working tool that monetizes market complexity into concrete profit. In my article, I revealed the secret and gave access to 10 folders for Claude with the help of which this was created.

With the help of Claude, I developed an innovative approach to analyzing market volatility and earned $9,670 in 21 days. The model views volatility not as a static indicator, but as a dynamic process of interaction between two forces: > Trend-reinforcing pressure: Pressure reinforcing the current trend. > Mean-reverting pressure: Forces stabilizing the market and returning the price to average values. The mathematical core of the model: V = P(+) - P(-) Key advantages: > Tracking the accumulation of pressure > Risk adaptability > Uniqueness This is not just a theory: it is a working tool that monetizes market complexity into concrete profit. In my article, I revealed the secret and gave access to 10 folders for Claude with the help of which this was created.

Bober_smart

38,662 views • 4 months ago

Qullamaggie shows Why Market Crashes Never Happen Above the 10 and 20 Day Moving Averages “There's no reason for a crash. Like guys, crashes don't happen at the highs, okay? If you study every market crash in history, they usually start below the 200-day moving average, below the 50-day moving average. I've never seen, if you go back and look at the market indices the past 50 or 100 years for the Dow Jones, no market crash started when the index was above the 10, 20 day moving averages. Could this be the start of a bigger pullback? Yes, but if you're like looking for a free fall type of a market crash, it's not gonna happen above the rising moving averages. There’s just too much dip buying. So don't worry about it. Go and study market action. Market behavior. You'll see it for yourself. Then you don't have to listen, you can turn off the TV, not listen to all these idiots calling for this and that. Because you know that that's not how markets work.”

Qullamaggie shows Why Market Crashes Never Happen Above the 10 and 20 Day Moving Averages “There's no reason for a crash. Like guys, crashes don't happen at the highs, okay? If you study every market crash in history, they usually start below the 200-day moving average, below the 50-day moving average. I've never seen, if you go back and look at the market indices the past 50 or 100 years for the Dow Jones, no market crash started when the index was above the 10, 20 day moving averages. Could this be the start of a bigger pullback? Yes, but if you're like looking for a free fall type of a market crash, it's not gonna happen above the rising moving averages. There’s just too much dip buying. So don't worry about it. Go and study market action. Market behavior. You'll see it for yourself. Then you don't have to listen, you can turn off the TV, not listen to all these idiots calling for this and that. Because you know that that's not how markets work.”

Lone

28,179 views • 1 year ago

Synphony deploys robots to pick strawberries. It's a $3B market in California alone, where labor is 60% of cost and the workforce is shrinking fast. Robots just hit the crossover point with field labor, and strawberries are the wedge — berries are a $15B market, and the same deployment layer extends everywhere else. Congrats on the launch, Sean Wu and saichi!

Synphony deploys robots to pick strawberries. It's a $3B market in California alone, where labor is 60% of cost and the workforce is shrinking fast. Robots just hit the crossover point with field labor, and strawberries are the wedge — berries are a $15B market, and the same deployment layer extends everywhere else. Congrats on the launch, Sean Wu and saichi!

Y Combinator

53,553 views • 3 months ago

5.5 billion people on the internet. All of them use money. Lily Liu on the token supercycle. "What we're in the midst of right now is the token supercycle. Everything of value is becoming programmable." "Money, assets, ownership, and markets are always going to move towards the largest market, and that largest market is the internet capital market." "This is not just a market rally or a near-term narrative. It's a structural transformation of global capital markets."

5.5 billion people on the internet. All of them use money. Lily Liu on the token supercycle. "What we're in the midst of right now is the token supercycle. Everything of value is becoming programmable." "Money, assets, ownership, and markets are always going to move towards the largest market, and that largest market is the internet capital market." "This is not just a market rally or a near-term narrative. It's a structural transformation of global capital markets."

Solana

135,680 views • 12 days ago

🚨IEX and Market coupling, Rajeev Thakker explains what he thinks on the market coupling and IEX. The power market continues to be strong, and power trading has a good future. Market coupling is an uncertainty, In a bear case, Even if a market coupling case does come in, Volumes and liquidity will still remain with IEX, PPFAS owns more than 9% of IEX, And has been buying more, Needless to say, Even in the base case, IEX will continue to remain the market leader Love the fact that PPFAS is even answering investor stock-specific questions and sharing the rationale of investment!

🚨IEX and Market coupling, Rajeev Thakker explains what he thinks on the market coupling and IEX. The power market continues to be strong, and power trading has a good future. Market coupling is an uncertainty, In a bear case, Even if a market coupling case does come in, Volumes and liquidity will still remain with IEX, PPFAS owns more than 9% of IEX, And has been buying more, Needless to say, Even in the base case, IEX will continue to remain the market leader Love the fact that PPFAS is even answering investor stock-specific questions and sharing the rationale of investment!

Aditya Shah

93,888 views • 9 months ago

🚨 WARNING: THE WORST DAY OF 2026 IS TOMORROW. JPMorgan is preparing to dump $165,000,000,000 into the market right at open. Thinking this won’t move the market? You’re in for the rudest awakening of your life. Every time JP Morgan sells stocks, the S&P 500 drops 10–20%. And this isn't just about the stock market. It's about liquidity. It's about investor sentiment. And it's about a market that isn't prepared for what's coming. Let me explain: JPMorgan isn't some retail trader taking profits. It's one of the largest and most influential financial institutions on the planet. When they move capital at scale, markets pay attention. And history shows that large institutional selling rarely happens in a vacuum. It usually signals something bigger. A shift in risk appetite. A change in liquidity conditions. Or growing concerns beneath the surface that most investors haven't recognized yet. Now here's the part almost nobody talks about. The direct impact isn't limited to the stocks being sold. Because when a major institution dumps billions of dollars worth of equities, it affects sentiment across the entire market. Selling creates more selling. Liquidity gets thinner. Volatility increases. And risk assets everywhere start to feel the pressure. That's why this isn't just an S&P 500 story. The S&P 500 is the first domino. But the effects will spread into AI stocks. International equities. Commodities. Credit markets. And even digital assets. Today, people are positioned for stability. They're positioned for higher prices. They're positioned for the rally to continue. Which means they're vulnerable if liquidity suddenly moves in the opposite direction. THIS IS THE WARNING. Not because one institution is selling. But because markets often underestimate what large-scale institutional selling can trigger. The risk isn't the transaction itself. The risk is how everyone else reacts to it. Markets aren't pricing that possibility today. But eventually, they will. I've spent more than a decade studying macro and market cycles. I've called some of the biggest market tops and bottoms of the past 10+ years. And I'll call the next market crash in 2026 before the crowd sees it coming. Follow and turn notifications on. I'll post my next market call here first.

🚨 WARNING: THE WORST DAY OF 2026 IS TOMORROW. JPMorgan is preparing to dump $165,000,000,000 into the market right at open. Thinking this won’t move the market? You’re in for the rudest awakening of your life. Every time JP Morgan sells stocks, the S&P 500 drops 10–20%. And this isn't just about the stock market. It's about liquidity. It's about investor sentiment. And it's about a market that isn't prepared for what's coming. Let me explain: JPMorgan isn't some retail trader taking profits. It's one of the largest and most influential financial institutions on the planet. When they move capital at scale, markets pay attention. And history shows that large institutional selling rarely happens in a vacuum. It usually signals something bigger. A shift in risk appetite. A change in liquidity conditions. Or growing concerns beneath the surface that most investors haven't recognized yet. Now here's the part almost nobody talks about. The direct impact isn't limited to the stocks being sold. Because when a major institution dumps billions of dollars worth of equities, it affects sentiment across the entire market. Selling creates more selling. Liquidity gets thinner. Volatility increases. And risk assets everywhere start to feel the pressure. That's why this isn't just an S&P 500 story. The S&P 500 is the first domino. But the effects will spread into AI stocks. International equities. Commodities. Credit markets. And even digital assets. Today, people are positioned for stability. They're positioned for higher prices. They're positioned for the rally to continue. Which means they're vulnerable if liquidity suddenly moves in the opposite direction. THIS IS THE WARNING. Not because one institution is selling. But because markets often underestimate what large-scale institutional selling can trigger. The risk isn't the transaction itself. The risk is how everyone else reacts to it. Markets aren't pricing that possibility today. But eventually, they will. I've spent more than a decade studying macro and market cycles. I've called some of the biggest market tops and bottoms of the past 10+ years. And I'll call the next market crash in 2026 before the crowd sees it coming. Follow and turn notifications on. I'll post my next market call here first.

WhaleTwits

340,862 views • 2 months ago

🚨 WARNING: TOMORROW WILL BE THE WORST DAY OF 2026!! JPMorgan will dump $165 BILLION in U.S. stocks right after the market opens. If you think this is a "drop in the ocean" and it won’t affect the markets... YOU ARE COMPLETELY WRONG. Every time JP Morgan sells stocks, the S&P 500 drops 10–20%. And this isn't just about the stock market. It's about liquidity. It's about investor sentiment. And it's about a market that isn't prepared for what's coming. Let me explain: JPMorgan isn't some retail trader taking profits. It's one of the largest and most influential financial institutions on the planet. When they move capital at scale, markets pay attention. And history shows that large institutional selling rarely happens in a vacuum. It usually signals something bigger. A shift in risk appetite. A change in liquidity conditions. Or growing concerns beneath the surface that most investors haven't recognized yet. Now here's the part almost nobody talks about. The direct impact isn't limited to the stocks being sold. Because when a major institution dumps billions of dollars worth of equities, it affects sentiment across the entire market. Selling creates more selling. Liquidity gets thinner. Volatility increases. And risk assets everywhere start to feel the pressure. That's why this isn't just an S&P 500 story. The S&P 500 is the first domino. But the effects will spread into AI stocks. International equities. Commodities. Credit markets. And even digital assets. Today, people are positioned for stability. They're positioned for higher prices. They're positioned for the rally to continue. Which means they're vulnerable if liquidity suddenly moves in the opposite direction. THIS IS THE WARNING. Not because one institution is selling. But because markets often underestimate what large-scale institutional selling can trigger. The risk isn't the transaction itself. The risk is how everyone else reacts to it. Markets aren't pricing that possibility today. But eventually, they will. I've spent more than a decade studying macro and market cycles. I've called some of the biggest market tops and bottoms of the past 10+ years. And I'll call the next market crash in 2026 before the crowd sees it coming. Follow and turn notifications on. I'll post my next market call here first.

🚨 WARNING: TOMORROW WILL BE THE WORST DAY OF 2026!! JPMorgan will dump $165 BILLION in U.S. stocks right after the market opens. If you think this is a "drop in the ocean" and it won’t affect the markets... YOU ARE COMPLETELY WRONG. Every time JP Morgan sells stocks, the S&P 500 drops 10–20%. And this isn't just about the stock market. It's about liquidity. It's about investor sentiment. And it's about a market that isn't prepared for what's coming. Let me explain: JPMorgan isn't some retail trader taking profits. It's one of the largest and most influential financial institutions on the planet. When they move capital at scale, markets pay attention. And history shows that large institutional selling rarely happens in a vacuum. It usually signals something bigger. A shift in risk appetite. A change in liquidity conditions. Or growing concerns beneath the surface that most investors haven't recognized yet. Now here's the part almost nobody talks about. The direct impact isn't limited to the stocks being sold. Because when a major institution dumps billions of dollars worth of equities, it affects sentiment across the entire market. Selling creates more selling. Liquidity gets thinner. Volatility increases. And risk assets everywhere start to feel the pressure. That's why this isn't just an S&P 500 story. The S&P 500 is the first domino. But the effects will spread into AI stocks. International equities. Commodities. Credit markets. And even digital assets. Today, people are positioned for stability. They're positioned for higher prices. They're positioned for the rally to continue. Which means they're vulnerable if liquidity suddenly moves in the opposite direction. THIS IS THE WARNING. Not because one institution is selling. But because markets often underestimate what large-scale institutional selling can trigger. The risk isn't the transaction itself. The risk is how everyone else reacts to it. Markets aren't pricing that possibility today. But eventually, they will. I've spent more than a decade studying macro and market cycles. I've called some of the biggest market tops and bottoms of the past 10+ years. And I'll call the next market crash in 2026 before the crowd sees it coming. Follow and turn notifications on. I'll post my next market call here first.

0xNobler

376,022 views • 2 months ago

Bloomberg's James Seyffart on why ETF flows are a mirror, not a signal "They're just a piece of the pie. Honestly, they reflect what's going on in the broader market more than anything. There was a time where you got an ETF on an underlying asset and that actually moved the market, people thought it was going to bring more demand, whatnot. There's some truth to that." "But for the most part it's just reflecting what's going on in the market. We had some puking in June when the whole market was puking, which was the first time the ETFs really puked up some Bitcoin. It's really just a reflection of what's going on." "And some underlying heartbeat of demand, I think, is true from advisors."

Bloomberg's James Seyffart on why ETF flows are a mirror, not a signal "They're just a piece of the pie. Honestly, they reflect what's going on in the broader market more than anything. There was a time where you got an ETF on an underlying asset and that actually moved the market, people thought it was going to bring more demand, whatnot. There's some truth to that." "But for the most part it's just reflecting what's going on in the market. We had some puking in June when the whole market was puking, which was the first time the ETFs really puked up some Bitcoin. It's really just a reflection of what's going on." "And some underlying heartbeat of demand, I think, is true from advisors."

The Wolf Of All Streets

29,791 views • 6 days ago