Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

And this is how Rep. Benny Abante gets vindicated. Remember when Sara Duterte went to Isko’s campaign rally in Manila to campaign against Abante? Not just that: nag-post pa sya maliciously ng photo ni Abante na hindi dapat i-post. Pero pikon kasi sya because Abante asked her questions she...

imtheatan's profile picture

Thea Tan

4,428 subscribers

75,415 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Congressman Benny Abante SINUPALPAL si Vice President Inday Sara Duterte Right off the bat, can we give this man his flowers? Congressman Benny Abante just stole the show at the OVP's 2025 budget deliberation! When Vice President Sara Duterte tried to dodge questions and accuse the budget hearing of being politicized, Abante schooled her on courtesy and decorum like a true pro. His stand against the Vice President’s condescending behavior was the real highlight of the day! The question Rep. Abante posed to VP Sara was simple: Does the Vice President believe that the House of Representatives, as representatives of the people, have the right to scrutinize the budget of every government agency? VP Sara, ready with her script, did not give a straight answer—something that didn’t sit well with Rep. Abante. Congressman Benny Abante didn’t mince words: “Why do you have to explain?” But instead of giving Rep. Abante the courtesy of a simple answer to a simple question, what did we witness instead? Evasion, immaturity, and a public meltdown. Clearly, the Vice President is hiding something—and this isn’t just any issue; it’s about public funds!
10:55

Congressman Benny Abante SINUPALPAL si Vice President Inday Sara Duterte Right off the bat, can we give this man his flowers? Congressman Benny Abante just stole the show at the OVP's 2025 budget deliberation! When Vice President Sara Duterte tried to dodge questions and accuse the budget hearing of being politicized, Abante schooled her on courtesy and decorum like a true pro. His stand against the Vice President’s condescending behavior was the real highlight of the day! The question Rep. Abante posed to VP Sara was simple: Does the Vice President believe that the House of Representatives, as representatives of the people, have the right to scrutinize the budget of every government agency? VP Sara, ready with her script, did not give a straight answer—something that didn’t sit well with Rep. Abante. Congressman Benny Abante didn’t mince words: “Why do you have to explain?” But instead of giving Rep. Abante the courtesy of a simple answer to a simple question, what did we witness instead? Evasion, immaturity, and a public meltdown. Clearly, the Vice President is hiding something—and this isn’t just any issue; it’s about public funds!

Informed PH

736,227 просмотров • 2 лет назад

4TH IMPEACHMENT COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST VP SARA A fourth impeachment complaint was filed on Wednesday against Vice President Sara Duterte, endorsed by Manila 6th District Rep. Benny Abante and House Deputy Speaker and La Union 1st District Rep. Paolo Ortega. This came after VP Sara declared her intention to run for president in the 2028 national elections.
0:45

4TH IMPEACHMENT COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST VP SARA A fourth impeachment complaint was filed on Wednesday against Vice President Sara Duterte, endorsed by Manila 6th District Rep. Benny Abante and House Deputy Speaker and La Union 1st District Rep. Paolo Ortega. This came after VP Sara declared her intention to run for president in the 2028 national elections.

Bilyonaryo News Channel

11,157 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

‘SHE MIGHT BE WINNABLE, BUT SHE IS NOT UNBEATABLE’ Manila 6th district Rep. Bienvenido "Benny" Abante Jr. believes VP Sara Duterte’s early declaration of presidential bid could be a "blessing in disguise" to those who will run against her: This will expose the vice president to a lot of questions she should be answering. | via Harlene Delgado
1:47

‘SHE MIGHT BE WINNABLE, BUT SHE IS NOT UNBEATABLE’ Manila 6th district Rep. Bienvenido "Benny" Abante Jr. believes VP Sara Duterte’s early declaration of presidential bid could be a "blessing in disguise" to those who will run against her: This will expose the vice president to a lot of questions she should be answering. | via Harlene Delgado

ABS-CBN News

68,085 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

'THE VICE PRESIDENT IS NOT A PRIVATE CITIZEN. THE WIFE OF CONGRESSMAN SUNTAY IS A PRIVATE CITIZEN' WATCH: Manila Rep. Benny Abante fires back at Quezon City Rep. Bong Suntay for arguing that - metaphorically - his wife had threatened to kill him but never did, in defending the assassination remarks of Vice President Sara against President Bongbong Marcos and his family members. "That is a red flag for national stability and constitutional order," Abante said at the House justice committee deliberations on the impeachment complaints against Duterte. | Lance Mejico
2:06

'THE VICE PRESIDENT IS NOT A PRIVATE CITIZEN. THE WIFE OF CONGRESSMAN SUNTAY IS A PRIVATE CITIZEN' WATCH: Manila Rep. Benny Abante fires back at Quezon City Rep. Bong Suntay for arguing that - metaphorically - his wife had threatened to kill him but never did, in defending the assassination remarks of Vice President Sara against President Bongbong Marcos and his family members. "That is a red flag for national stability and constitutional order," Abante said at the House justice committee deliberations on the impeachment complaints against Duterte. | Lance Mejico

NewsWatch Plus PH

150,439 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

"[Her letter] is an insult to this institution... I do not care even if she is the Vice President" WATCH: Rep. Benny Abante reacts to Vice President Sara Duterte's recent letter and "no show" at the resumption of House appropriations panel's deliberation for the proposed 2025 budget of the Office of the Vice President (OVP) on Tuesday. In the letter dated September 10, Duterte said that the OVP will "defer entirely to the discretion and judgment of the Committee regarding our budget proposal for the upcoming year." The OVP did not send any representative to face lawmakers and defend their proposed P2 billion budget next year. Read more:
3:25

"[Her letter] is an insult to this institution... I do not care even if she is the Vice President" WATCH: Rep. Benny Abante reacts to Vice President Sara Duterte's recent letter and "no show" at the resumption of House appropriations panel's deliberation for the proposed 2025 budget of the Office of the Vice President (OVP) on Tuesday. In the letter dated September 10, Duterte said that the OVP will "defer entirely to the discretion and judgment of the Committee regarding our budget proposal for the upcoming year." The OVP did not send any representative to face lawmakers and defend their proposed P2 billion budget next year. Read more:

GMA News

432,561 просмотров • 1 год назад

SARA DUTERTE TARGETS AKBAYAN, RISA HONTIVEROS IN IMPEACHMENT CRITICISM WATCH: Vice President Sara Duterte says the Akbayan party-list has no credibility in endorsing an impeachment complaint against her, claiming that no evidence were attached to support the allegations in that complaint. She also cites a portion of the 2024 speech of Sen. Risa Hontiveros, who is associated with Akbayan, wherein Hontiveros said that Duterte is supported by China. "Hindi malinaw kung ano ang ipinaglalaban nila para sa kaayusan ng bayan, pero napakalinaw ng kanilang pamumulitika at pagpapahirap sa usaping diplomasya ng ating bansa," Duterte says. Akbayan party-list Rep. Perci Cendaña is one of the endorsers of the second impeachment complaint against Duterte filed by a group of civil society and religious leaders on Feb. 2. The Makabayan bloc supported the first impeachment complaint submitted by the progressive coalition Bagong Alyansang Makabayan. NewsWatch Plus is reaching out to Akbayan and Hontiveros for comment. 📹 Office of the Vice President
1:31

SARA DUTERTE TARGETS AKBAYAN, RISA HONTIVEROS IN IMPEACHMENT CRITICISM WATCH: Vice President Sara Duterte says the Akbayan party-list has no credibility in endorsing an impeachment complaint against her, claiming that no evidence were attached to support the allegations in that complaint. She also cites a portion of the 2024 speech of Sen. Risa Hontiveros, who is associated with Akbayan, wherein Hontiveros said that Duterte is supported by China. "Hindi malinaw kung ano ang ipinaglalaban nila para sa kaayusan ng bayan, pero napakalinaw ng kanilang pamumulitika at pagpapahirap sa usaping diplomasya ng ating bansa," Duterte says. Akbayan party-list Rep. Perci Cendaña is one of the endorsers of the second impeachment complaint against Duterte filed by a group of civil society and religious leaders on Feb. 2. The Makabayan bloc supported the first impeachment complaint submitted by the progressive coalition Bagong Alyansang Makabayan. NewsWatch Plus is reaching out to Akbayan and Hontiveros for comment. 📹 Office of the Vice President

NewsWatch Plus PH

286,530 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Behavior Unbecoming of a Vice President Desperate to keep her family’s influence in Philippine politics or maybe some sort of revenge for being the very first Vice President impeached in the history of the land — Sara Zimmerman Duterte on her campaign tour is proving to the world that the articles of impeachment as submitted are correct. That indeed… SHE IS UNFIT TO REMAIN IN OFFICE! Anywhere she goes, all she could offer are senseless accusations and baseless criticisms against the people who voted for her impeachment. At least she is honest that her intentions are selfish, that her endorsement of the candidates is solely for self-preservation. I dare Sara Zimmerman Duterte to tell the people listening to you, what did you do to make their lives better? You promised to solve the education crisis, things went worse when you were Department of Education Secretary. And don’t let me get started with the Office of the Vice President! Your incompetence is beyond me! I can guarantee that in terms of accomplishments and competence, you are nothing compared to those who voted to impeach you! You are nothing but those you are discrediting. If she thinks that duly elected representatives are not worth the explanation about questionable expenditures of her offices, I dare Sara Zimmerman Duterte to explain to her supporters what she claims to love and value. The impeachment prosecutors are very confident that one of the prayers in the complaint is the continuation of the proceeding even if she chooses to resign. The impeachment complaint is clear, that 80% of the members of the House of Representatives were convinced. Seven impeachment articles! And she only needs to be convicted in one! Do not vote any Duterte candidates this May 2025!
0:38

Behavior Unbecoming of a Vice President Desperate to keep her family’s influence in Philippine politics or maybe some sort of revenge for being the very first Vice President impeached in the history of the land — Sara Zimmerman Duterte on her campaign tour is proving to the world that the articles of impeachment as submitted are correct. That indeed… SHE IS UNFIT TO REMAIN IN OFFICE! Anywhere she goes, all she could offer are senseless accusations and baseless criticisms against the people who voted for her impeachment. At least she is honest that her intentions are selfish, that her endorsement of the candidates is solely for self-preservation. I dare Sara Zimmerman Duterte to tell the people listening to you, what did you do to make their lives better? You promised to solve the education crisis, things went worse when you were Department of Education Secretary. And don’t let me get started with the Office of the Vice President! Your incompetence is beyond me! I can guarantee that in terms of accomplishments and competence, you are nothing compared to those who voted to impeach you! You are nothing but those you are discrediting. If she thinks that duly elected representatives are not worth the explanation about questionable expenditures of her offices, I dare Sara Zimmerman Duterte to explain to her supporters what she claims to love and value. The impeachment prosecutors are very confident that one of the prayers in the complaint is the continuation of the proceeding even if she chooses to resign. The impeachment complaint is clear, that 80% of the members of the House of Representatives were convinced. Seven impeachment articles! And she only needs to be convicted in one! Do not vote any Duterte candidates this May 2025!

Just

56,772 просмотров • 1 год назад

Is the Supreme Court ruling on the impeachment of Sara Zimmerman Duterte based on erroneous facts? I was there! I didn’t miss the chance to witness history — I can say for a fact that the ruling of the Supreme Court was based on erroneous facts and anyone can check it via the Livestream of the House of Representatives that day. February 5, 2025. One of the things which concerns me here is the additional requirement that came out of nowhere— not in the 1987 Constitution and not even in the existing ruling of the Supreme Court. Speaker Martin Romualdez in an interview yesterday said that the House of Representatives followed the existing precedent also from the Supreme Court — the Francisco and Gutierrez ruling. How can the House follow something that doesn’t exist during that time? Please make sense. Atty. Princess Abante released an explainer video explaining the factual truth about what transpired in the House of Representatives on February 5. Aside from the House Journal and official reports, the public can easily check the livestream of the House of Representatives. I don’t care if the Supreme Court ruling was written by an Aquino appointee because it doesn’t make sense to me at all! Please take time to watch the video — Atty. Abante was able to explain the side of the House of Representatives. Also, why would the Supreme Court put more weight to a news article versus an official journal and actually videos? Now, please tell me… How can we just trust the decision of the Supreme Court?
6:54

Is the Supreme Court ruling on the impeachment of Sara Zimmerman Duterte based on erroneous facts? I was there! I didn’t miss the chance to witness history — I can say for a fact that the ruling of the Supreme Court was based on erroneous facts and anyone can check it via the Livestream of the House of Representatives that day. February 5, 2025. One of the things which concerns me here is the additional requirement that came out of nowhere— not in the 1987 Constitution and not even in the existing ruling of the Supreme Court. Speaker Martin Romualdez in an interview yesterday said that the House of Representatives followed the existing precedent also from the Supreme Court — the Francisco and Gutierrez ruling. How can the House follow something that doesn’t exist during that time? Please make sense. Atty. Princess Abante released an explainer video explaining the factual truth about what transpired in the House of Representatives on February 5. Aside from the House Journal and official reports, the public can easily check the livestream of the House of Representatives. I don’t care if the Supreme Court ruling was written by an Aquino appointee because it doesn’t make sense to me at all! Please take time to watch the video — Atty. Abante was able to explain the side of the House of Representatives. Also, why would the Supreme Court put more weight to a news article versus an official journal and actually videos? Now, please tell me… How can we just trust the decision of the Supreme Court?

Just

36,072 просмотров • 1 год назад

Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-CA): “Mr. Secretary, who won the 2020 presidential election?” Secretary of State Marco Rubio: “I’m not here to answer [questions] about 2020. This is a foreign affairs committee.” Sara Jacobs: “Okay great. You can’t answer the question, even though we all know that President Biden won!” Marco Rubio: “No! I don’t answer the question because as Secretary of State, I do not participate in domestic political issues.” Sara Jacobs: “This is not about domestic political issues, this is about our democracy.” Marco Rubio: “It most certainly is… You’re asking me to opine. Just like I don’t do campaign rallies—because as Secretary of State we’re not supposed to. That’s been the long tradition of the department. And you should know that if you’ve been on this committee for any period of time.” NUKED!
1:09

Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-CA): “Mr. Secretary, who won the 2020 presidential election?” Secretary of State Marco Rubio: “I’m not here to answer [questions] about 2020. This is a foreign affairs committee.” Sara Jacobs: “Okay great. You can’t answer the question, even though we all know that President Biden won!” Marco Rubio: “No! I don’t answer the question because as Secretary of State, I do not participate in domestic political issues.” Sara Jacobs: “This is not about domestic political issues, this is about our democracy.” Marco Rubio: “It most certainly is… You’re asking me to opine. Just like I don’t do campaign rallies—because as Secretary of State we’re not supposed to. That’s been the long tradition of the department. And you should know that if you’ve been on this committee for any period of time.” NUKED!

RedWave Press

90,241 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Senate President Chiz Escudero said they can dismiss the impeachment complaint with just the majority vote It is as if Escudero is laying out the predicate — testing the waters and public clamour when the possibility of them dismissing the impeachment complaint actually happens. After the whole remand of the articles fiasco, we can see right through him and who is with him on this. It doesn’t take the most brilliant of minds to say that the constitution specifically says “TRY AND DECIDE” —- it is the mandate of the impeachment court for the actual trial to happen. Legal luminaries and even framers of the Philippine constitution call him out on this! I am beginning to believe what they say, that this is not about Sara Duterte anymore— this is about his Senate presidency. To decide whether or not the impeachment complaint is constitutional is not within the mandate of the Senate nor the impeachment court. Senate President Escudero is also trying to dilute the exclusive power granted by the Constitution to the House of Representatives to initiate impeachment proceedings — saying they can decide to dismiss the case even before trial. One very dangerous precedent if you ask me. We haven’t heard a decent explanation nor defense from Sara Zimmerman Duterte, not one from formal or informal set-up. The Vice President kept diverting the issue into technicalities and accusations. Where did all the money go? I am not a fan of Atty. Fortun but I respect what he can do but not even his law firm can give good defense. Sara Duterte’ ad cautelam even cited rulings that are no longer valid. Please watch the explanation of Atty. Bucoy from his press conference earlier this afternoon.
1:23

Senate President Chiz Escudero said they can dismiss the impeachment complaint with just the majority vote It is as if Escudero is laying out the predicate — testing the waters and public clamour when the possibility of them dismissing the impeachment complaint actually happens. After the whole remand of the articles fiasco, we can see right through him and who is with him on this. It doesn’t take the most brilliant of minds to say that the constitution specifically says “TRY AND DECIDE” —- it is the mandate of the impeachment court for the actual trial to happen. Legal luminaries and even framers of the Philippine constitution call him out on this! I am beginning to believe what they say, that this is not about Sara Duterte anymore— this is about his Senate presidency. To decide whether or not the impeachment complaint is constitutional is not within the mandate of the Senate nor the impeachment court. Senate President Escudero is also trying to dilute the exclusive power granted by the Constitution to the House of Representatives to initiate impeachment proceedings — saying they can decide to dismiss the case even before trial. One very dangerous precedent if you ask me. We haven’t heard a decent explanation nor defense from Sara Zimmerman Duterte, not one from formal or informal set-up. The Vice President kept diverting the issue into technicalities and accusations. Where did all the money go? I am not a fan of Atty. Fortun but I respect what he can do but not even his law firm can give good defense. Sara Duterte’ ad cautelam even cited rulings that are no longer valid. Please watch the explanation of Atty. Bucoy from his press conference earlier this afternoon.

Just

19,826 просмотров • 1 год назад

Napakagaling! Koko Pimentel praised for legal brilliance in Sara impeachment proceedings Senate Minority Leader Aquilino "Koko" Pimentel III is heaping praises for his legal chops during the Senate impeachment proceedings. Pimentel, a Bar topnotcher, was one of the only five senators who stood their ground and opposed a Senate motion to return the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte to the House of Representatives. The outgoing senator argued there is no 'return to sender' concept in the impeachment proceedings. He was concerned that this was an apparent not-so-subtle attempt to bury the case. "Mabuhay ka, Senator Koko Pimentel! Bar topnotcher na, napakagaling na Minority Leader pa!" Senator Risa Hontiveros said in a Facebook post. Video courtesy: Senator Risa Hontiveros/Facebook
1:26

Napakagaling! Koko Pimentel praised for legal brilliance in Sara impeachment proceedings Senate Minority Leader Aquilino "Koko" Pimentel III is heaping praises for his legal chops during the Senate impeachment proceedings. Pimentel, a Bar topnotcher, was one of the only five senators who stood their ground and opposed a Senate motion to return the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte to the House of Representatives. The outgoing senator argued there is no 'return to sender' concept in the impeachment proceedings. He was concerned that this was an apparent not-so-subtle attempt to bury the case. "Mabuhay ka, Senator Koko Pimentel! Bar topnotcher na, napakagaling na Minority Leader pa!" Senator Risa Hontiveros said in a Facebook post. Video courtesy: Senator Risa Hontiveros/Facebook

Politiko

122,866 просмотров • 1 год назад

Chair Luistro: VP answer to impeachment raps reads like prohibited motion to dismiss HOUSE Committee on Justice Chair Atty. Gerville “Jinky Bitrics” Luistro of Batangas on Tuesday said the response submitted by Vice President Sara Z. Duterte to the impeachment complaints against her “doesn’t seem like an answer” and instead appears to be a prohibited pleading under House rules. Luistro said her reading of the Vice President’s filing raised serious procedural concerns. “Apparently for me, it doesn’t seem like an answer. While I was reading the answer, it looks like a motion to dismiss,” Luistro said in a radio interview. Luistro pointed out that such a pleading is not allowed in impeachment proceedings. “At maliwanag sa ating rules of impeachment ng House of Representatives that motion to dismiss is a prohibited pleading dito sa impeachment proceeding,” Luistro added. Luistro said the submission failed to directly address the accusations laid out in the complaints. “At least if I base it on the allegations contained in the answer, hindi siya responsive dun sa grounds, dun sa offenses alleged in the impeachment complaint. In effect, parang hindi sumagot and instead they are questioning the proceeding before the Justice Committee in support of their intention to dismiss the impeachment complaint,” Luistro said. Luistro also said the committee could treat the Vice President’s filing as a general denial, noting that the lack of a direct response may leave the allegations standing. “Ngayon considering that the answer is not responsive to the complaint, it appears like unrebutted ang mga allegations ng complainant,” she said. “Kumbaga since hindi sinagot directly, it is as if tinanggap ang allegations na ito and we will be perceiving this as general denial ng mga allegations doon sa complaint,” Luistro said. She maintained that the House panel had already established the sufficiency of the complaints during earlier deliberations, stressing that the respondent was given the opportunity to answer the charges. “We respect the opinion of the camp of the Vice President but of course we’ve been very cautious in the compliance to our rules,” Luistro said.
3:46

Chair Luistro: VP answer to impeachment raps reads like prohibited motion to dismiss HOUSE Committee on Justice Chair Atty. Gerville “Jinky Bitrics” Luistro of Batangas on Tuesday said the response submitted by Vice President Sara Z. Duterte to the impeachment complaints against her “doesn’t seem like an answer” and instead appears to be a prohibited pleading under House rules. Luistro said her reading of the Vice President’s filing raised serious procedural concerns. “Apparently for me, it doesn’t seem like an answer. While I was reading the answer, it looks like a motion to dismiss,” Luistro said in a radio interview. Luistro pointed out that such a pleading is not allowed in impeachment proceedings. “At maliwanag sa ating rules of impeachment ng House of Representatives that motion to dismiss is a prohibited pleading dito sa impeachment proceeding,” Luistro added. Luistro said the submission failed to directly address the accusations laid out in the complaints. “At least if I base it on the allegations contained in the answer, hindi siya responsive dun sa grounds, dun sa offenses alleged in the impeachment complaint. In effect, parang hindi sumagot and instead they are questioning the proceeding before the Justice Committee in support of their intention to dismiss the impeachment complaint,” Luistro said. Luistro also said the committee could treat the Vice President’s filing as a general denial, noting that the lack of a direct response may leave the allegations standing. “Ngayon considering that the answer is not responsive to the complaint, it appears like unrebutted ang mga allegations ng complainant,” she said. “Kumbaga since hindi sinagot directly, it is as if tinanggap ang allegations na ito and we will be perceiving this as general denial ng mga allegations doon sa complaint,” Luistro said. She maintained that the House panel had already established the sufficiency of the complaints during earlier deliberations, stressing that the respondent was given the opportunity to answer the charges. “We respect the opinion of the camp of the Vice President but of course we’ve been very cautious in the compliance to our rules,” Luistro said.

🇵🇭 Laitera🇵🇭

13,123 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Bongbong Marcos and Martin Romualdez versus Imee Marcos Re: San Juanico Bridge Rehabilitation Imee Romualdez Marcos is just a Waray when it benefits her, huh? Despite that, Tacloban City supported her, enough to end up second in the polls. But for the love of the Dutertes, she’s not just willing to abandon her family —- she also abandoned her common sense and reason. In her desperate attempt to paint Martin Romualdez in a bad light to please Sara Duterte, Imee Marcos made a fool out of herself. House Spokesperson, Atty. Princess Abante, argued that if she wanted to… as Senator, she has every power/ mandate to propose a higher budget for the San Juanico bridge. Atty. Abante in several media interviews that Martin Romualdez made sure that there are funds allocated for San Juanico bridge, she cited actual amounts: “P27M noong 2018, P22M noong 2019, P105M noong 2021, P90M noong 2022, P150M noong 2023, at may proposal na P400M para sa 2026.” But as Atty. Clarie Castro mentioned in the video attached below, it was only during the time of President Bongbong Marcos Jr., that the bridge was inspected. When the President went to Tacloban with the House Speaker Romualdez and Senior Deputy Majority Leader Sandro Marcos… he hinted that the previous administration neglected the maintenance of the bridge. Well, Imee Marcos sure knows how to point fingers but not willing to do the work. Both President Bongbong Marcos Jr and House Speaker Martin Romualdez are already working to address the problem, as both recognize the vital role of the bridge for the economy of Samar and Leyte. Romauldez and Acidre coordinated with public and private sectors to come up with alternative routes by sea while the repair is on-going. The President also set an ultimatum, he wants the San Juanico bridge rehab done by December. And no, we don’t want Imee Marcos as the next President. She’s just another Sara Duterte lapdog for reasons I really don’t know. Lols
1:11

Bongbong Marcos and Martin Romualdez versus Imee Marcos Re: San Juanico Bridge Rehabilitation Imee Romualdez Marcos is just a Waray when it benefits her, huh? Despite that, Tacloban City supported her, enough to end up second in the polls. But for the love of the Dutertes, she’s not just willing to abandon her family —- she also abandoned her common sense and reason. In her desperate attempt to paint Martin Romualdez in a bad light to please Sara Duterte, Imee Marcos made a fool out of herself. House Spokesperson, Atty. Princess Abante, argued that if she wanted to… as Senator, she has every power/ mandate to propose a higher budget for the San Juanico bridge. Atty. Abante in several media interviews that Martin Romualdez made sure that there are funds allocated for San Juanico bridge, she cited actual amounts: “P27M noong 2018, P22M noong 2019, P105M noong 2021, P90M noong 2022, P150M noong 2023, at may proposal na P400M para sa 2026.” But as Atty. Clarie Castro mentioned in the video attached below, it was only during the time of President Bongbong Marcos Jr., that the bridge was inspected. When the President went to Tacloban with the House Speaker Romualdez and Senior Deputy Majority Leader Sandro Marcos… he hinted that the previous administration neglected the maintenance of the bridge. Well, Imee Marcos sure knows how to point fingers but not willing to do the work. Both President Bongbong Marcos Jr and House Speaker Martin Romualdez are already working to address the problem, as both recognize the vital role of the bridge for the economy of Samar and Leyte. Romauldez and Acidre coordinated with public and private sectors to come up with alternative routes by sea while the repair is on-going. The President also set an ultimatum, he wants the San Juanico bridge rehab done by December. And no, we don’t want Imee Marcos as the next President. She’s just another Sara Duterte lapdog for reasons I really don’t know. Lols

Just

42,457 просмотров • 1 год назад

Upon serious consultation with the petitioners of the 2nd impeachment complaint, which I and Cong. De Lima endorsed, they intend to withdraw their case and instead throw their support behind the 3rd impeachment complaint. Kasama ng mga complainants, nais kong diinan na hindi ito pag-urong, kundi pagpapatuloy ng kanilang sinimulan higit isang taon na ang nakaraan. From the beginning, their intent in filing was clear: Build the strongest case that will hold Vice President Sara Duterte accountable for her acts of corruption and abuse of power. Ngayon pa lang, may ibang kaalyado ng Vice President na natutuwa sa pagwi-withdraw ng complaint, thinking this shows a weakening of the case against her. Pasensya na po kung babasagin ko ang trip nila. Mas pinadadali pa nga natin ang pagpapa-impeach sa kanya. With one less complaint, we are now expediting Vice President Sara Duterte’s long-delayed day of accountability. I fully trust that this Committee will decide on the merits of this case, nang sa wakas ay maihatid na natin ito hanggang sa Senado. Tuloy ang laban!
2:51

Upon serious consultation with the petitioners of the 2nd impeachment complaint, which I and Cong. De Lima endorsed, they intend to withdraw their case and instead throw their support behind the 3rd impeachment complaint. Kasama ng mga complainants, nais kong diinan na hindi ito pag-urong, kundi pagpapatuloy ng kanilang sinimulan higit isang taon na ang nakaraan. From the beginning, their intent in filing was clear: Build the strongest case that will hold Vice President Sara Duterte accountable for her acts of corruption and abuse of power. Ngayon pa lang, may ibang kaalyado ng Vice President na natutuwa sa pagwi-withdraw ng complaint, thinking this shows a weakening of the case against her. Pasensya na po kung babasagin ko ang trip nila. Mas pinadadali pa nga natin ang pagpapa-impeach sa kanya. With one less complaint, we are now expediting Vice President Sara Duterte’s long-delayed day of accountability. I fully trust that this Committee will decide on the merits of this case, nang sa wakas ay maihatid na natin ito hanggang sa Senado. Tuloy ang laban!

Rep. Perci Cendaña

12,151 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The Supreme Court just proved to all of us that the ICC case against Rodrigo Roa Duterte is necessary It all made sense now! There’s a reason for the remand, there’s the reason for all the unnecessary delays — they are waiting for this decision.I feel like we’re being robbed of the truth by the very institution we tasked to uphold the constitution. Why are they trying so hard for us not to know the truth? All these layers of protection are telling me that there are a lot of things Sara Zimmerman Duterte is hiding and she will do whatever it takes for a no-trial scenario. Justice Leonen claims that their duty is just to protect the rule of law – to protect fairness or due process. But it feels like they are just protecting the accused, as trial doesn’t mean conviction. And all the four impeachment complaints have the same goal — to impeach Sara Zimmerman Duterte. I don’t understand! How was directly transmitting the impeachment complaint wrong? 215 congressmen signed the complaint! That is more than the required ⅔ votes of the constitution. I have read the decision, in my simple mind — THIS IS AN OUTRIGHT PROTECTION FOR THOSE ARE IN POWER. A very dangerous precedent. The Supreme Court single handedly tipped the balance away from the people by overturning the ruling in 2003 — the Francisco vs the House of Representatives reiterating that only the House holds the constitutional authority to initiate impeachment. More than ⅔ of the members signed the impeachment complaint and they are just throwing it away because of technicality. The response of the House of Representatives is available online, they explained how they counted the session days —- it is rules of procedure, the Supreme Court doesn’t concern themselves with the rules of a co-equal branch. How was that unfair for the accused? I heard the rumor that this might happen days before the announcement of the Supreme Court — still, this ruling hit me hard. I have no good words to say at the moment. It is comforting that the House of Representatives released a statement today that they will seek all legal matters: Atty Princess Abante said: “The House will exhaust all remedies to protect the independence of Congress and preserve the sanctity of our constitutional role. This is not defiance. This is constitutional fidelity.” I cannot consider the statements of the Senators as good news for now, just as long as Chiz Escudero is the Senate President —- the very reason for all the delays until this happened. I have no faith in them.
0:59

The Supreme Court just proved to all of us that the ICC case against Rodrigo Roa Duterte is necessary It all made sense now! There’s a reason for the remand, there’s the reason for all the unnecessary delays — they are waiting for this decision.I feel like we’re being robbed of the truth by the very institution we tasked to uphold the constitution. Why are they trying so hard for us not to know the truth? All these layers of protection are telling me that there are a lot of things Sara Zimmerman Duterte is hiding and she will do whatever it takes for a no-trial scenario. Justice Leonen claims that their duty is just to protect the rule of law – to protect fairness or due process. But it feels like they are just protecting the accused, as trial doesn’t mean conviction. And all the four impeachment complaints have the same goal — to impeach Sara Zimmerman Duterte. I don’t understand! How was directly transmitting the impeachment complaint wrong? 215 congressmen signed the complaint! That is more than the required ⅔ votes of the constitution. I have read the decision, in my simple mind — THIS IS AN OUTRIGHT PROTECTION FOR THOSE ARE IN POWER. A very dangerous precedent. The Supreme Court single handedly tipped the balance away from the people by overturning the ruling in 2003 — the Francisco vs the House of Representatives reiterating that only the House holds the constitutional authority to initiate impeachment. More than ⅔ of the members signed the impeachment complaint and they are just throwing it away because of technicality. The response of the House of Representatives is available online, they explained how they counted the session days —- it is rules of procedure, the Supreme Court doesn’t concern themselves with the rules of a co-equal branch. How was that unfair for the accused? I heard the rumor that this might happen days before the announcement of the Supreme Court — still, this ruling hit me hard. I have no good words to say at the moment. It is comforting that the House of Representatives released a statement today that they will seek all legal matters: Atty Princess Abante said: “The House will exhaust all remedies to protect the independence of Congress and preserve the sanctity of our constitutional role. This is not defiance. This is constitutional fidelity.” I cannot consider the statements of the Senators as good news for now, just as long as Chiz Escudero is the Senate President —- the very reason for all the delays until this happened. I have no faith in them.

Just

69,229 просмотров • 1 год назад

Taylor Swift Super Bowl reactive PR campaign got our Las Vegas Chapel client 100 links, and counting. Links in: ↳ New York Post ↳ NBC News ↳ KTLA ↳ ABC News ↳ ...and 100 more. This video shows exactly how we've done it. I even reveal the pitch that we sent to publishers. The campaign was launched this week, and the links are still flowing in. Quick note: This is not a typical PR campaign. You should NOT expect 100 links with every PR campaign. A typical campaign is about 8-10 links, but this went a bit more overdrive. You can do these campaigns yourself, or you can join our client base here👇 #seo #digitalpr
5:18

Taylor Swift Super Bowl reactive PR campaign got our Las Vegas Chapel client 100 links, and counting. Links in: ↳ New York Post ↳ NBC News ↳ KTLA ↳ ABC News ↳ ...and 100 more. This video shows exactly how we've done it. I even reveal the pitch that we sent to publishers. The campaign was launched this week, and the links are still flowing in. Quick note: This is not a typical PR campaign. You should NOT expect 100 links with every PR campaign. A typical campaign is about 8-10 links, but this went a bit more overdrive. You can do these campaigns yourself, or you can join our client base here👇 #seo #digitalpr

Fery Kaszoni

892,864 просмотров • 2 лет назад