Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
Andrew Wilson vs. Naima debate part 1
16,937 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 10

I agree with him but it’s a pipe dream. Only shareholders in the country get a say. If you’re a taker, no vote.

The detective is in. All episodes of #CrossOnPrime are NOW STREAMING on @PrimeVideo.

Debates are pointless. As long as men don't play to win because they want to be diplomatic, they will always lose. Women want to win. Men want to be fair.

Male land owner only.

Naomia is a vaxtard

This chick loves proving over and over and over again that she wasted a shit ton of money on a higher education to still be a fucking retard at the end of it

Andrew made a silly argument here and the lady could have easily won against it.

Poland (1st Polish-Lihtuanian Commonwealth) tried to exactly that, limit voting of the nobles to the ones which have land/property so the broke ones could not be bought for their votes. It failed. Guess what, in result the Polish state literally ceased to exist.

Some might call this woke right, but then so were the founding fathers. He is essentially correct. An intact household voting system will largely prioritize prosperity for the family and secure its future. No more desert storms.

Guy that got stuffed in lockers as a kid, never served, advocating to have to serve to vote 🤦🏻♂️
