Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Andrew Wilson vs. Naima debate part 1

16,937 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля a p dubya
a p dubya1 год назад

I agree with him but it’s a pipe dream. Only shareholders in the country get a say. If you’re a taker, no vote.

Фото профиля Skydance
Skydance1 год назад

The detective is in. All episodes of #CrossOnPrime are NOW STREAMING on @PrimeVideo.

Фото профиля Jack Silva
Jack Silva1 год назад

Debates are pointless. As long as men don't play to win because they want to be diplomatic, they will always lose. Women want to win. Men want to be fair.

Фото профиля Lisa Lisa and the cult jam
Lisa Lisa and the cult jam1 год назад

Male land owner only.

Фото профиля Josh
Josh1 год назад

Naomia is a vaxtard

Фото профиля Johnny Johnstone
Johnny Johnstone1 год назад

This chick loves proving over and over and over again that she wasted a shit ton of money on a higher education to still be a fucking retard at the end of it

Фото профиля Simon Gould
Simon Gould1 год назад

Andrew made a silly argument here and the lady could have easily won against it.

Фото профиля Enigmatic Thinker
Enigmatic Thinker1 год назад

Poland (1st Polish-Lihtuanian Commonwealth) tried to exactly that, limit voting of the nobles to the ones which have land/property so the broke ones could not be bought for their votes. It failed. Guess what, in result the Polish state literally ceased to exist.

Фото профиля Pat
Pat1 год назад

Some might call this woke right, but then so were the founding fathers. He is essentially correct. An intact household voting system will largely prioritize prosperity for the family and secure its future. No more desert storms.

Фото профиля PEPSEP
PEPSEP1 год назад

Guy that got stuffed in lockers as a kid, never served, advocating to have to serve to vote 🤦🏻‍♂️

Похожие видео