正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Naima vs. Andrew Wilson on voting rights debate part 3
16,562 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)
11 条评论

When her eyes rolled in the back of her head you can tell her brain shut off that's why she never understood

I think the right to vote at 35 is a great idea.👍

Do you support or oppose Elon's & Trump's positions on Women? Bathrooms & sports? Take the Survey:

You could see the exact second the logic broke her.

I just saw the opening seconds of this clip as I scrolled my feed. Without seeing any more than that she is coming from an emotional state in her argument. It is therefore invalid. Prove me wrong. If I am wrong it should be easy to do so since I did not watch or listen to the clip

I actually wouldn’t be opposed to household voting. That actually makes sense, considering that it would eliminate voter fraud and I assume you’d have to prove that you are the head of household. Problems arise only with single households. Do women who raise kids count? Is the debate about the 19th amendment being discussed too and if so who votes in that house if she’s single with kids and no father?

This bitch fucking dumb bruh💀

If women shouldn’t vote then women should NOT pay a single $ in taxes Taxation without representation? That’s why we fought a revolutionary war Can’t have it both ways @paleochristcon

New episode tonight Brian?

Andrew may have opened up a whole other debate here on the age requirements to be POTUS..............

Married women tend to be more conservative than single women. One vote per household would therefore disadvantage conservatives, no?
