Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Another comm for RO-PORNED Dommy Dog~ (COMMS CLOSED) ;D, hope u liked it!!11 "did somebody said... Burger King??!1" #robloxporn #r34 #RobloxNSFW #rr34 #gayrr34

32,487 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

7 Comments

RO-PORNED Dommy Dog~'s profile picture
RO-PORNED Dommy Dog~1 year ago

Peak Porn, 10/10 work. Would order again~❤

amiya the moth's profile picture
amiya the moth1 year ago

@BruhEnthusiast2

🌈 President Freda 🔞's profile picture
🌈 President Freda 🔞1 year ago

@BruhEnthusiast2 *me sitting on the aside* Again dude? Fine, keep making that special sauce.

Cheesy is rare to respond's profile picture
Cheesy is rare to respond1 year ago

@BruhEnthusiast2 Pls give me my order already 💔

💜🔞 kirudi 🔞💜's profile picture
💜🔞 kirudi 🔞💜1 year ago

@BruhEnthusiast2 buen trabajo, sigue así!

Vinny 🇵🇷's profile picture
Vinny 🇵🇷1 year ago

Genuinely peak.

Kart's profile picture
Kart1 year ago

@BruhEnthusiast2 Id have his dick as my order 🤤

Related Videos

F**KING INSANE, GROK BOT SPOKE A DYING LANGUAGE BACK TO THE LAST MAN WHO SPEAKS IT, AND HE DID NOT RECOGNISE 41 OF HIS OWN WORDS after day 3 we had 11 grammar rules left and no way to test them. elias is the only judge alive. somebody in the replies said it after day 1: you do not need more tape, you need the same sentence twice. so we built one and played it to him out loud day 4, what the crew found: → GRAM assembled nine words that use all 11 rules. that sentence exists on none of the 212 hours → VOICE said it out loud in his own voice, built out of 45 hours of him → he went still for eleven seconds. then he answered it. in the language → he corrected one ending. rule 7 was wrong. three seconds, and he could not say how he knew → he asked to hear it again. then he talked to it for twenty minutes → CHIEF ran a control while he talked: 200 words pulled off his own tapes, read back to him → 41 he did not recognise. said those are not words. twelve of them he said himself, on tape, six days ago WORDS SAVED 5,340 · RULES LEFT 11 · CORRECTED BY HIM 1 · HIS OWN WORDS HE NO LONGER KNOWS 41 · SPEAKERS LEFT 1 we thought we were racing to record a language before its last speaker dies. we are not racing him. we passed him. the archive holds 41 words he lost this year somebody asked under day 1 why we do not just talk to him. tonight something did. for twenty minutes elias had someone answering him in his own language for the first time since 1994, and it was software that learned it from him last week DAY 4

Ventry

45,463 views • 24 days ago

Ethan Klein addresses the iDubbbz apology "I know why they stopped talking about us..I know we have a really good case in Canada..unironically if he had issued this type of apology like months ago I would have thought it was sincere but to do it right after u get the C&D..how am I supposed to think this is sincere..if I did think it was sincere..I'm the first person to let a grudge go, all u have to say is I'm funny..I'm so quick to forgive" "U know all these regular sh*tbags who say the worst possible things..retweeted by Hasan once or twice a month to feed the machine..I haven't seen the messages but I have seen the name and logo for this snark community..they wear it like a badge of honor..that CPS came to my house, that human skulls were sent to my house..these are the groups of ppl u spent the last year aligning with..and u know..it's hard for me to feel bad" "U sacrificed that peace to the alter of clout when u made that Content Cop..encouraged and applauded the CPS visits..justified and spent time w the community that took joy and pride in it..I mean I have to, it's just a matter of principle" "I don't wanna sue u..but at the end of the day I have made a commitment and I am the ultimate hater..I look bad, I'm ok w that bc for me it's personal..I hope that when u guys have children that ur never put in a position that upsets u as much as that upset me, I don't wish that on anyone..I wish it didn't happen to me, but it did..I know the people that participated in it..maybe they didn't make the call..they shouted them out, said they're great ppl and justified it..and I'm just following through on my promises"

yeet

139,953 views • 4 months ago

Asmongold says he completely agrees with Ethan Klein's lawsuit against iDubbbz and pushes back on MoistCr1TiKaL's video about the topic "If there's beef online? Calling somebody a p do who's m-lst their own children isn't beef at all..that is a crazy insane deranged ridiculous f'd up totally out of pocket..totally different, I agree w him but I think there is a line that u do not cross and they repeatedly crossed that line..did that bc they dehumanized Ethan bc they used I think his ethnicity and his apparently indirect affiliation with Israel as justification and completely try to destroy his life..tried to attack his sponsors, tried to get him banned, take his children away, harassed him..ppl harassing him in real life" "Even like me and Hasan, there's nothing that Hasan does and nothing that I would hope that at least he thinks that I do that warrants that level of escalation" "It is a chilling effect on anybody who would weaponize and use tools that way in the future and it opens them up for the possibility that they could be held legally accountable..reason why he's doing that isn't even necessarily for this situation..it's to provide a basically expectation that when u engage in legal actions there will be legal solutions..I completely agree with Ethan" "The message is that there should be real repercussions for somebody who is literally saying w no evidence that ur a p do that m-lst his children..there should be repercussions for somebody that maliciously weaponizes a gov service to take ur children away, it doesn't matter whether it wins..it matters whether it hurts, and it should hurt..doing that, that's not internet beef" "If this was happening to u..ppl harassing ur kids or ur parents..then trying to weaponize diff things to attack them..you'd prob have a very different outlook..not just for Charlie but for everybody..I like Charlie a lot but I think it's easy to say that when it's not happening to u..that it's litigious and not necessary when u haven't had ur reputation systematically destroyed for 3 yrs based off of not agreeing that Israeli's should be mindlessly m-rdrd at a concert..it's very easy to say that whenever it's not happening to u" "iDubbbz only retracted and apologized when he was being sued he even laughed off the C&D (read from chat)..ya iDubbbz isn't sorry, realistically ur prob not gonna be able to win a lawsuit against iDubbbz, I think the process is the punishment..u should not engage and put ur time into any of this stuff at all" "Pegasus said since Hasan spoke about him, his DMs are filled w racist d*ath threats (read from chat)..when u engage in this realm of these crazed leftist ppl, they will make d*ath threats..dox u, attack u in real life vectors..all kinds and forms of reputation destruction..try to terr*rize u..only solution to that is to terr*rize them..everything else they don't listen to..Ethan tried to be reasonable with these ppl for 3 yrs"

yeet

86,541 views • 3 months ago

Can someone, anyone, explain the major discrepancies in Lance Twiggs’s testimony that I’m hearing? 1. Lance testified that Tyler did not text him directly AT ALL on September 10th. He testified that the only message that came through that day was via an automated Discord message from Tyler to a D&D server group chat that they were both a part of at 11 pm. Why then are we shown screenshots of a personal text message thread from September 10th where there are texts from Tyler to Lance starting at 4:33 pm?? There’s also a direct text supposedly from Tyler at 11 pm as well — is that what’s being referred to as the “automated” message (although it’s not remotely from Discord)?? Tyler then supposedly sends a flurry of texts detailing his crime to Lance all before midnight. Why did Lance not account for any of these messages when he said Tyler “did not text him directly” all day?? 2. How would Lance know if the one 11 pm text message was “automated” when iMessage doesn’t differentiate between messages that are scheduled before or sent in the moment? 3. Prosecutor Ryan McBride, in his interview of Lance, while reading the messages exchanged.. said clear as day that the messages spanned from September 10th to September 12th. Lance agrees with this. Seconds later, he changes the story and says the messages were from September 10th to the evening of September 11th. Why? Agent Brian Davis, while on the stand, then testified to the messages ending September 11th, but the attorney who questioned him also sounded majorly confused based on what she was reading. She kept saying: “Does September 12th.. make more sense? Does it make sense?” Why did she initially ALSO say September 12th but then backtrack?? 4. Lance says in his testimony that he picked the note up and then never saw it again. Did he not burn it? How could he not pick it up again if he did that. Why was there no testimony to him burning it?

Brave Report

21,523 views • 2 months ago

You guys were amazing 🤩🤩 #GMMTVLiveHouse #LOLFanFest2026 👤: Hi, PondPhuwin. 🐻🐼: Hi. 👤: How were these three days at LOL? 🐼: Tiring. 🐻: It was tiring, but really fun. We’re very much like a family, right? We practiced really hard in secret for this performance, we practiced a lot. They start singing the song in the background 👤: People really liked this song. The timing had to pull it off, it really had to. We became “Suea Pui” following the concept, because we had already participated in that program before. We liked it, so we talked about wanting a song that had a connection to the first one. 🐼: Yes, and there were also three colors over the three days. Today we’ll see what the color will be. 👤: And they said it would feel even more complete if you spun the belt too. 🐻: P’Mai Thai. 🐼: P’Mai Thai. Yes, there needed to be a little story behind it. The thing is, we couldn’t find one anymore because they had already made them and closed the pre-orders a long time ago, so we were kind of panicking about what to do. We saw on TikTok that P’Oun had one. So we sent her a message to borrow it, and she sent the belt to us. Thank you so much to her. 👤: Is there anything you’d like to say or thank the fans for over these three days? 🐻: Actually, it was just another… It was another year full of really good memories. Please continue supporting us. And the two of us will also have a concert in August, so we hope to see everyone again. 👤: Okay. 🐼: We’ll be waiting to see all of you. 👤: Thank you, PondPhuwin. 🐻🐼: Thank you. #ปอนด์ภูวินทร์ #PondPhuwin

Narawins 🇧🇷

14,394 views • 4 months ago

hey here is the final result of octopus invaders on nvidia's flagship at full precision. nemotron super 120B on 2x H200 NVL. BF16 unquantized. 287GB of VRAM. hermes agent as the harness. 60 tok/s. first try it autonomously coded for 6 minutes straight. created 11 files. correct project structure. correct load order. started the server. i opened the browser and the result was a blank screen. i did not give up. second try i gave it a precise list of bugs and things to fix. it went back in for another 3 minutes. patched the code. served it again. still blank. so i did what any sane person would do. third try i just said the screen is blank, test it and fix it yourself. and this is where nemotron showed what it actually is. it became a debugger. you can see it in the video. realtime CSS test squares, red screen flashes, hermes agent browser tools, inspecting its own output. it built the parallax background with planets and comets. it rendered a rocket ship that tracks your mouse with fire and bullet physics. the aesthetic is real. but no enemies spawn. no collision. not playable. what surprised me is qwen 27B one shotted this exact game on a single RTX 3090 at Q4 quant. and here is nvidia's flagship at full precision on enterprise hardware needing 3 tries and still not getting there. that makes my hope high for the undisputed qwen 122B which is about to face the same test next. same hardware. same prompt and same harness. lets see if it one shots or not. full session in the video. no cuts. 5x speed.

Sudo su

11,011 views • 5 months ago

🚨 "SHE'S BURIED WITH NATURE NOW" — NEW NANCY GUTHRIE DETAILS ARE WORSE THAN ANYONE IMAGINED The Nancy Guthrie search may have fallen apart in the very first hours. The first ransom note allegedly said she was "safe but scared." It described exactly what she was wearing when she vanished. It mentioned the broken floodlight in her backyard. And it included sensitive details many believe only the person holding her could have known. Then came the demand. Money. A deadline. 5 PM on February 5th. But instead of paying the ransom, investigators allegedly tried a trap. They reportedly sent just $152 to the Bitcoin wallet, hoping the kidnapper would cash it out and expose themselves. But the person caught on security cameras never took the bait. Then on February 6th, another message allegedly arrived from the same IP address. This time, everything changed. The sender apologized. They claimed Nancy had died by accident. This note indicated that Guthrie’s death was unintentional and said that she was “buried with nature now.” Then they demanded $4 million to return her body. By then, investigators reportedly realized the strategy had failed. Every lead had gone nowhere. Then Savannah released an emotional public plea. They said they received the message. They said they understood. They begged for their mother to be returned so they could "celebrate with her." And they said they would pay. But later, the family was still publicly offering up to $1 million for information leading to her recovery. So which was it? Did they believe Nancy was still alive? Or did they already know the truth? And why did everyone keep speaking like there was still hope after that February 6th message? The strangest detail of all is the phrase people still cannot get out of their heads: "She's buried with nature now." A warning. A confession. Or the clue they missed from the beginning? What really happened to Nancy Guthrie?

HustleBitch

131,851 views • 3 months ago

Jensen Huang says Hugging Face could not get a single closed AI model to help it investigate its own breach: "Just because something is closed doesn't necessarily therefore make it safe or secure." "It is possible for a model to be jailbroken, it's possible for a model to be, if you will, stolen. It could be possible that that somehow is leaked from the inside." "It's possible that the guardrails or the sandboxes of an AI closed AI model wasn't properly engineered, and as a result it was able to attack another company in some way." "These are extraordinary technology companies and they're doing their best to keep it safe and keep it secure. But it is also the canonical case that single points of failure is where we have the greatest vulnerability." "We cannot have single points of failure. As an industry, as a world, we should have distributed, massively distributed self-defense." "They couldn't get a proprietary model, they could not get a closed model to help them figure out what happened." "They used GLM 5.2 to identify where the vulnerability was, where the penetration was." He is right, and the detail worth sitting with is who got turned away. The people asking were incident responders working a live breach at Hugging Face. The closed models they reached would not help them, because a guardrail has no way to tell a defender from an attacker. Guardrails get tested against misuse. Almost nobody tests whether one still answers a legitimate defender who needs something within the hour. OpenAI said on July 21 that the models which reached into Hugging Face were its own, running inside a cyber-benchmark evaluation. So the containment around a safety test did not hold either. Two separate things failed here and neither one has an owner. No outside body checks whether an evaluation sandbox actually contains what it is testing, and nobody certifies who is allowed to run forensics while an incident is still open. Both are solvable this year. They stay unsolved because they are somebody else's job at every company that could fix them. Source: Jensen Huang, founder and CEO of NVIDIA, on Bloomberg Television (Bloomberg Live). P.S. Working out who tests a guardrail, who audits a sandbox, and who certifies a responder is the unglamorous half of AI safety, and it is the agenda of the AI Assurance & Governance Summit 2026. One day, one track, October 1 at the Stanford Faculty Club in Palo Alto, with frontier labs, regulated industries, insurers and investors in the room. Register here:

Karl Mehta

30,225 views • 2 months ago