Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Can someone, anyone, explain the major discrepancies in Lance Twiggs’s testimony that I’m hearing? 1. Lance testified that Tyler did not text him directly AT ALL on September 10th. He testified that the only message that came through that day was via an automated Discord message from Tyler to... a D&D server group chat that they were both a part of at 11 pm. Why then are we shown screenshots of a personal text message thread from September 10th where there are texts from Tyler to Lance starting at 4:33 pm?? There’s also a direct text supposedly from Tyler at 11 pm as well — is that what’s being referred to as the “automated” message (although it’s not remotely from Discord)?? Tyler then supposedly sends a flurry of texts detailing his crime to Lance all before midnight. Why did Lance not account for any of these messages when he said Tyler “did not text him directly” all day?? 2. How would Lance know if the one 11 pm text message was “automated” when iMessage doesn’t differentiate between messages that are scheduled before or sent in the moment? 3. Prosecutor Ryan McBride, in his interview of Lance, while reading the messages exchanged.. said clear as day that the messages spanned from September 10th to September 12th. Lance agrees with this. Seconds later, he changes the story and says the messages were from September 10th to the evening of September 11th. Why? Agent Brian Davis, while on the stand, then testified to the messages ending September 11th, but the attorney who questioned him also sounded majorly confused based on what she was reading. She kept saying: “Does September 12th.. make more sense? Does it make sense?” Why did she initially ALSO say September 12th but then backtrack?? 4. Lance says in his testimony that he picked the note up and then never saw it again. Did he not burn it? How could he not pick it up again if he did that. Why was there no testimony to him burning it?show more

Brave Report

7,878 subscribers

21,523 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

So lemme get this straight: Lance Twiggs's DNA was on the towel & screwdriver; Lance has the same pair of converse as Tyler; Lance has access to the Discord and Tyler's computer; Lance allegedly "found" the confession note (which no longer exists) from an 11 PM automated/scheduled text from a Tyler (lolololol); and now we also find out the dremel that Tyler allegedly used to engrave the bullets was Lance's?! Did I hear that right? Oh, and Lance also said that Tyler NEVER TALKED ABOUT CHARLIE KIRK. 🤯😭 Will someone please tell me how this can't be interpreted as a frame job? Lol

So lemme get this straight: Lance Twiggs's DNA was on the towel & screwdriver; Lance has the same pair of converse as Tyler; Lance has access to the Discord and Tyler's computer; Lance allegedly "found" the confession note (which no longer exists) from an 11 PM automated/scheduled text from a Tyler (lolololol); and now we also find out the dremel that Tyler allegedly used to engrave the bullets was Lance's?! Did I hear that right? Oh, and Lance also said that Tyler NEVER TALKED ABOUT CHARLIE KIRK. 🤯😭 Will someone please tell me how this can't be interpreted as a frame job? Lol

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

742,948 views • 7 days ago

🔥👀 LANCE TWIGGS VIDEO TESTIMONY IS PLAYED in the Provo, Utah courtroom for the world to see after attempts by the Tyler Robinson defense to prevent it. “ HE HAD SAID HE WAS PLANNING ON GOING HUNTING WITH HIS FAMILY & WANTED TO ENGRAVE MESSAGES ON BULLETS” - Twiggs Twiggs is shown a note and explains finding it under his computer keyboard. He then took a picture of it. He then asks him about the discord messages. Robinson played D&D. He was asking for a tool to do this a month before at most. Says they met in 2023. He first met his as a new roommate. Says they BEGAN DATING months after they moved in. Tyler Robinson spent the night of the 9th & 10th and left early because Tyler claimed he had a LONG RIDE to work. Says Tyler did not message him all day until 11pm on the 10th This is the video deposition regarding the assassination of Charlie Kirk by alleged assassin Tyler Robinson Twiggs seems to confirm he engraved the bullets. 👀Jack Posobiec

🔥👀 LANCE TWIGGS VIDEO TESTIMONY IS PLAYED in the Provo, Utah courtroom for the world to see after attempts by the Tyler Robinson defense to prevent it. “ HE HAD SAID HE WAS PLANNING ON GOING HUNTING WITH HIS FAMILY & WANTED TO ENGRAVE MESSAGES ON BULLETS” - Twiggs Twiggs is shown a note and explains finding it under his computer keyboard. He then took a picture of it. He then asks him about the discord messages. Robinson played D&D. He was asking for a tool to do this a month before at most. Says they met in 2023. He first met his as a new roommate. Says they BEGAN DATING months after they moved in. Tyler Robinson spent the night of the 9th & 10th and left early because Tyler claimed he had a LONG RIDE to work. Says Tyler did not message him all day until 11pm on the 10th This is the video deposition regarding the assassination of Charlie Kirk by alleged assassin Tyler Robinson Twiggs seems to confirm he engraved the bullets. 👀Jack Posobiec

Johnny St.Pete

20,756 views • 7 days ago

Here's the proof that Tyler Robinson was mirandized at 6:25 PM on Thursday, September 11th—NOT Friday the 12th, as the fedsloppers claim. Post this wherever you see one of them arguing it was the 12th. Why it's important: 1. Tyler supposedly posted a confession to Discord at 7:57 PM on September 11th. But by that time, he'd already been sitting in custody at the Washington County Sheriff's office since 6:25 PM and NOT confessing. 2. At 7:50 PM the night of the 11th, while Tyler was already in custody, they held the infamous press conference where they released video and pictures to aid the manhunt. Later, it would be claimed that Tyler's dad recognized these photos and persuaded Tyler to turn himself in. But if Tyler was already in custody when those pictures were released, this narrative was a lie. 3. If they're lying about how and when Tyler turned himself in—and if the Discord confession is fake—then this is powerful evidence of a conspiracy & cover-up. That is why the fedsloppers need "the evening of Tyler's arrest" to be Friday, September 12th, not Thursday the 11th. NOTE: Whether you accept this newly discovered timeline or not, you're left with only 2 choices: either Tyler somehow confessed on Discord while he was in custody at the Sheriff's office and refusing to confess to them, OR he confessed on Discord WHILE he was counseling with his parents, detective friend & LDS bishop on the best course of action (and then turned himself in and refused to confess). Do either of those possibilities sound even remotely likely?

Here's the proof that Tyler Robinson was mirandized at 6:25 PM on Thursday, September 11th—NOT Friday the 12th, as the fedsloppers claim. Post this wherever you see one of them arguing it was the 12th. Why it's important: 1. Tyler supposedly posted a confession to Discord at 7:57 PM on September 11th. But by that time, he'd already been sitting in custody at the Washington County Sheriff's office since 6:25 PM and NOT confessing. 2. At 7:50 PM the night of the 11th, while Tyler was already in custody, they held the infamous press conference where they released video and pictures to aid the manhunt. Later, it would be claimed that Tyler's dad recognized these photos and persuaded Tyler to turn himself in. But if Tyler was already in custody when those pictures were released, this narrative was a lie. 3. If they're lying about how and when Tyler turned himself in—and if the Discord confession is fake—then this is powerful evidence of a conspiracy & cover-up. That is why the fedsloppers need "the evening of Tyler's arrest" to be Friday, September 12th, not Thursday the 11th. NOTE: Whether you accept this newly discovered timeline or not, you're left with only 2 choices: either Tyler somehow confessed on Discord while he was in custody at the Sheriff's office and refusing to confess to them, OR he confessed on Discord WHILE he was counseling with his parents, detective friend & LDS bishop on the best course of action (and then turned himself in and refused to confess). Do either of those possibilities sound even remotely likely?

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

28,401 views • 3 months ago

Tyler Robinson SURRENDERED around 9:00 PM on September 11, 2025 based on reports, video footage and other evidence. Discord was subpoenaed and provided records of Tyler’s confession messages, first sent at 7:57 PM MT. Testimony: Ms. Hunt: As part of your investigation, did law enforcement send a subpoena to Discord? Agent Davis: Yes, they did. Ms. Hunt: Were these messages recovered via that subpoena? Agent Davis: They were. Ms. Hunt: Did you review them? Agent Davis: Yes, I did. Ms. Hunt: In State’s Exhibit 16.2 that is before you, when is the first message from Tyler sent? Agent Davis: 7:57 PM. Ms. Hunt: It says “yesterday.” Do you have any knowledge of what day that would have been? Agent Davis: Yes. This would have been September 11th. Ms. Hunt: So the first message from Tyler that you’re seeing in State’s Exhibit 16.2 was sent on September 11th at 7:57 PM? Agent Davis: Yes, that’s correct. Ms. Hunt: You testified earlier that Mr. Robinson arrived at the Washington County Sheriff’s Office at approximately 9:00 PM. Is that right? Agent Davis: Yes, that’s correct. Ms. Hunt: Although you weren’t physically present there because you were flying down, how do you know he arrived at approximately 9:00 PM? Agent Davis: Based on the police reports I reviewed, and then by going back and looking at the video and other evidence.

Tyler Robinson SURRENDERED around 9:00 PM on September 11, 2025 based on reports, video footage and other evidence. Discord was subpoenaed and provided records of Tyler’s confession messages, first sent at 7:57 PM MT. Testimony: Ms. Hunt: As part of your investigation, did law enforcement send a subpoena to Discord? Agent Davis: Yes, they did. Ms. Hunt: Were these messages recovered via that subpoena? Agent Davis: They were. Ms. Hunt: Did you review them? Agent Davis: Yes, I did. Ms. Hunt: In State’s Exhibit 16.2 that is before you, when is the first message from Tyler sent? Agent Davis: 7:57 PM. Ms. Hunt: It says “yesterday.” Do you have any knowledge of what day that would have been? Agent Davis: Yes. This would have been September 11th. Ms. Hunt: So the first message from Tyler that you’re seeing in State’s Exhibit 16.2 was sent on September 11th at 7:57 PM? Agent Davis: Yes, that’s correct. Ms. Hunt: You testified earlier that Mr. Robinson arrived at the Washington County Sheriff’s Office at approximately 9:00 PM. Is that right? Agent Davis: Yes, that’s correct. Ms. Hunt: Although you weren’t physically present there because you were flying down, how do you know he arrived at approximately 9:00 PM? Agent Davis: Based on the police reports I reviewed, and then by going back and looking at the video and other evidence.

JaneDoeUKnow

17,579 views • 4 days ago

This has always bothered me.. Lance Twiggs stated today that he found a confession Letter in Tyler Robinson’s room, under his keyboard— he took a Screenshot of it and it was never seen again Here’s the problem… • September 15, 2025 Kash Patel first said that Tyler Robinson texted someone that he had an opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk • September 15, 2025 Kash then said there was a Handwritten Note, that doesn’t exist anymore, of Tyler, stating he had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk. He said it was destroyed, but “verified” via interrogation and forensic evidence of said note. So the only confirmation of a confession note is what Lance Twiggs took a screen shot of, but the original note got destroyed? Am I understanding that correctly? Sounds very odd…

This has always bothered me.. Lance Twiggs stated today that he found a confession Letter in Tyler Robinson’s room, under his keyboard— he took a Screenshot of it and it was never seen again Here’s the problem… • September 15, 2025 Kash Patel first said that Tyler Robinson texted someone that he had an opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk • September 15, 2025 Kash then said there was a Handwritten Note, that doesn’t exist anymore, of Tyler, stating he had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk. He said it was destroyed, but “verified” via interrogation and forensic evidence of said note. So the only confirmation of a confession note is what Lance Twiggs took a screen shot of, but the original note got destroyed? Am I understanding that correctly? Sounds very odd…

MJTruthUltra

169,453 views • 7 days ago

BREAKING: The Washington County Attorneys Office confirmed Tyler Robinson was arrested Thursday night, September 11, in Washington County BEFORE his transport to Utah County. This corroborates the booking sheet arrest date of September 11th. And it corroborates Baron Coleman's assertion that 'the evening of his arrest'—referenced in court documents—was indeed September 11th. Meaning that Tyler was first mirandized at 6:25 PM in Washington County (as indicated by the court documents)—a full hour and a half BEFORE the alleged Discord message confession at 7:57 PM. The Fed-sloppers must now argue that Tyler was mirandized at 6:25 PM, then allowed to keep his phone, then—while sitting in the sheriff's station mirandized—confessed on Discord that he killed Charlie Kirk and was going to turn himself in (even though he'd already turned himself in and is literally posting from inside the sheriff office)—and THEN was arrested and taken into custody by Brian Davis at 10 PM. They must also account for how Brian Davis arrived by 10 PM to Washington County when the drive from Provo/SLC to Washington County is over 3 hours long. H/t: Hadyn Wood

BREAKING: The Washington County Attorneys Office confirmed Tyler Robinson was arrested Thursday night, September 11, in Washington County BEFORE his transport to Utah County. This corroborates the booking sheet arrest date of September 11th. And it corroborates Baron Coleman's assertion that 'the evening of his arrest'—referenced in court documents—was indeed September 11th. Meaning that Tyler was first mirandized at 6:25 PM in Washington County (as indicated by the court documents)—a full hour and a half BEFORE the alleged Discord message confession at 7:57 PM. The Fed-sloppers must now argue that Tyler was mirandized at 6:25 PM, then allowed to keep his phone, then—while sitting in the sheriff's station mirandized—confessed on Discord that he killed Charlie Kirk and was going to turn himself in (even though he'd already turned himself in and is literally posting from inside the sheriff office)—and THEN was arrested and taken into custody by Brian Davis at 10 PM. They must also account for how Brian Davis arrived by 10 PM to Washington County when the drive from Provo/SLC to Washington County is over 3 hours long. H/t: Hadyn Wood

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

175,793 views • 2 months ago

‼️Candace Owens On The Shawn Ryan Podcast: "Tyler Robinson Is Total Patsy" — He Was Set Up By Lance Twiggs In the interview, Candace said she’s confident Tyler Robinson did not murder Charlie Kirk. At most, she believes he may have been an accessory — but she strongly suspects he was set up. She pointed directly at Tyler’s roommate and boyfriend, Lance Twiggs, calling him a likely federal asset. Candace noted that it’s “bonkers” the police never even questioned Lance, despite him being central to the official story they’re pushing. Her reasoning: If they were in a relationship, Lance would have had easy access to Tyler’s guns. It would have been simple for Lance to set Tyler up. She suggested Tyler may have been blackmailed, possibly through “weird stuff online” — the easiest way for the feds to control someone. This lines up with what many of us have been saying for months: Tyler Robinson doesn’t fit the profile of a lone gunman. The speed at which the “official story” was locked in, combined with the lack of scrutiny on Lance Twiggs, has always been one of the biggest red flags. If Lance Twiggs really is a federal asset who set Tyler up, then this wasn’t just a random act of violence — it was a coordinated operation. The more we learn, the clearer it becomes that the public is not being told the full story about what happened at UVU. FOLLOW Candace Owens and Shawn Ryan RT this. The truth is starting to come out.

Project Constitution

24,389 views • 13 days ago

Tyler Robinson Text Messages Deep Dive These text messages must be real otherwise the defense would get the case thrown out by simply producing the phone records. The messages include; • Direct confession by Tyler Robinson • His motive • Confirmation he was at the scene of the crime • Plan to escape with the gun, removing all evidence • That the gun was his grandfather's • The towel seen in the video of him dropping off the roof with his DNA on it • Engraving of the bullets seemingly before that info was publicly available • That his father suspected him from seeing the gun on TV • Confirmation that the deputy neighbor was with him when he turned himself in • Telling his lover to not talk to the media (which he hasn't) I don't understand how delusional someone must be to not realize this is absolute proof of guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. None of this requires trust in the FBI or MSM, the texts are from the telecoms.

Tyler Robinson Text Messages Deep Dive These text messages must be real otherwise the defense would get the case thrown out by simply producing the phone records. The messages include; • Direct confession by Tyler Robinson • His motive • Confirmation he was at the scene of the crime • Plan to escape with the gun, removing all evidence • That the gun was his grandfather's • The towel seen in the video of him dropping off the roof with his DNA on it • Engraving of the bullets seemingly before that info was publicly available • That his father suspected him from seeing the gun on TV • Confirmation that the deputy neighbor was with him when he turned himself in • Telling his lover to not talk to the media (which he hasn't) I don't understand how delusional someone must be to not realize this is absolute proof of guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. None of this requires trust in the FBI or MSM, the texts are from the telecoms.

Ashton Forbes

174,683 views • 9 months ago

Really can’t stress how devastating this revelation from Baron Coleman is to the “unofficial” Tyler Robinson timeline. I say unofficial timeline bc the most damning Discord chat message- the one leaked to and published by Ken Klippenstein on September 16, isn’t actually referenced in the Utah County probable cause court filing. No Discord chats whatsoever are mentioned there. There is a Discord chat mentioned in the booking charge, but it gives no specifics. If Tyler Robinson was in custody at 6:25 MST on September 11, 2025 he could not have written that supposed confession message. So if he didn’t write it, who did? Who had access to Tyler’s account? Who was Klippenstein’s source? That message has been used to convict Tyler in the court of public opinion. Where it originated is extremely important to figure out.

Really can’t stress how devastating this revelation from Baron Coleman is to the “unofficial” Tyler Robinson timeline. I say unofficial timeline bc the most damning Discord chat message- the one leaked to and published by Ken Klippenstein on September 16, isn’t actually referenced in the Utah County probable cause court filing. No Discord chats whatsoever are mentioned there. There is a Discord chat mentioned in the booking charge, but it gives no specifics. If Tyler Robinson was in custody at 6:25 MST on September 11, 2025 he could not have written that supposed confession message. So if he didn’t write it, who did? Who had access to Tyler’s account? Who was Klippenstein’s source? That message has been used to convict Tyler in the court of public opinion. Where it originated is extremely important to figure out.

Mel

655,572 views • 3 months ago

I have a question. If Brian Harpole and the military built the explosive microphone at Ft H and Tyler wasn’t involve then why is she now saying….. She absolutely believes Tyler was involved and he certainly buried clothes at Dairy Queen? Why would Tyler need to pick up clothes and bury them at DQ if he wasn’t at the college and didn’t shoot Charlie? That makes zero sense. What an odd thing to say. And if Lance is a FED and helped set Tyler up and she says Tyler was an accessory and burying the clothes, in her words not mine is Tyler a part of setting his own self up? 😂😂😂 Does she even think about what she says before she says it?

I have a question. If Brian Harpole and the military built the explosive microphone at Ft H and Tyler wasn’t involve then why is she now saying….. She absolutely believes Tyler was involved and he certainly buried clothes at Dairy Queen? Why would Tyler need to pick up clothes and bury them at DQ if he wasn’t at the college and didn’t shoot Charlie? That makes zero sense. What an odd thing to say. And if Lance is a FED and helped set Tyler up and she says Tyler was an accessory and burying the clothes, in her words not mine is Tyler a part of setting his own self up? 😂😂😂 Does she even think about what she says before she says it?

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

19,562 views • 19 days ago

Yes, the text messages between Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs were extremely strange. The phraseology of those text messages was very weird. However, the two individuals—Robinson and Twiggs—are extremely weird people. Robinson was in a homosexual relationship with Twiggs, a transgender-identifying "furry," whose drug and alcohol abuse was revealed to the Anonbirdd Substack by an insider who is friends with both Robinson and Twiggs: The insider also divulged the following: “Tyler was kinda your normal blue collar utah guy” and “And also for the record Tyler 100% calls lance my love when they are talking alone. That more than anything makes those texts real to me.” When you combine their deviant lifestyles, their Utah vernacular, and the insider who corroborates the text messages, the claim that these messages were forged by the feds doesn't hold water, in my opinion. There is far more evidence to the contrary—that the messages are real.

Sensitive content

Yes, the text messages between Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs were extremely strange. The phraseology of those text messages was very weird. However, the two individuals—Robinson and Twiggs—are extremely weird people. Robinson was in a homosexual relationship with Twiggs, a transgender-identifying "furry," whose drug and alcohol abuse was revealed to the Anonbirdd Substack by an insider who is friends with both Robinson and Twiggs: The insider also divulged the following: “Tyler was kinda your normal blue collar utah guy” and “And also for the record Tyler 100% calls lance my love when they are talking alone. That more than anything makes those texts real to me.” When you combine their deviant lifestyles, their Utah vernacular, and the insider who corroborates the text messages, the claim that these messages were forged by the feds doesn't hold water, in my opinion. There is far more evidence to the contrary—that the messages are real.

Liz Wheeler

322,141 views • 8 months ago

‼️🇺🇸: Family of Tyler Robinson CONFIRMS Tyler did NOT confess to his parents to k!lling Charlie Kirk. He told them that he did NOT k!ll Charlie. Tyler's parents do NOT believe Tyler k!lled Charlie Kirk. Tyler's parents called their bishop out of fear for his safety. NEITHER TYLER OR HIS PARENTS told the bishop or sheriff that Tyler k1lled Charlie Kirk. Someone in that chain Bishop>retired sheriff>sherrif changed the narrative. The retired sheriff turned Tyler in to the sheriff in the AFTERNOON of September 11th, 2025. Tyler's parents accompanied to support, phone was confiscated as soon as he arrived at the sheriff office. How did Tyler send text 'confessions" if he was in police custody? 🤔 The official narrative has some very BIG problems.

‼️🇺🇸: Family of Tyler Robinson CONFIRMS Tyler did NOT confess to his parents to k!lling Charlie Kirk. He told them that he did NOT k!ll Charlie. Tyler's parents do NOT believe Tyler k!lled Charlie Kirk. Tyler's parents called their bishop out of fear for his safety. NEITHER TYLER OR HIS PARENTS told the bishop or sheriff that Tyler k1lled Charlie Kirk. Someone in that chain Bishop>retired sheriff>sherrif changed the narrative. The retired sheriff turned Tyler in to the sheriff in the AFTERNOON of September 11th, 2025. Tyler's parents accompanied to support, phone was confiscated as soon as he arrived at the sheriff office. How did Tyler send text 'confessions" if he was in police custody? 🤔 The official narrative has some very BIG problems.

Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸

1,094,447 views • 18 days ago

🔥WOW…Harpole talks about THE SHOT TYLER ROBINSON TOOK that killed Charlie Kirk at UVU on 9/10. "IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC SPOT" - Shawn Ryan Brian Harpole says "He wants to know when he got on the roof. 3 meters to the left & to the right..THERE WAS NO SHOT. DID YOU GET ALL THAT OF GOOGLE?" Shawn Ryan says "IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN REHEARSED." Harpole also says that someone early that day had a drone up but it is not UNCOMMON for the AV team to use a drone. Once again a lot of this goes back to relying on the Chief of UVU and the belief that they had those roofs covered. And like I said that day..how did they know the exact perfect spot for that shot when Charlie NEVER did an event there? When was the tent SETUP? This wasn’t announced to the public under about 8/29..so when did he scout this? Did he go before? How was he lucky enough to know that THE UVU POLICE WOULD NOT cover that staircase. Why didn’t UVU ask for police assistance from Orem PD who are ALLOWED TO FLY DRONES?

🔥WOW…Harpole talks about THE SHOT TYLER ROBINSON TOOK that killed Charlie Kirk at UVU on 9/10. "IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC SPOT" - Shawn Ryan Brian Harpole says "He wants to know when he got on the roof. 3 meters to the left & to the right..THERE WAS NO SHOT. DID YOU GET ALL THAT OF GOOGLE?" Shawn Ryan says "IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN REHEARSED." Harpole also says that someone early that day had a drone up but it is not UNCOMMON for the AV team to use a drone. Once again a lot of this goes back to relying on the Chief of UVU and the belief that they had those roofs covered. And like I said that day..how did they know the exact perfect spot for that shot when Charlie NEVER did an event there? When was the tent SETUP? This wasn’t announced to the public under about 8/29..so when did he scout this? Did he go before? How was he lucky enough to know that THE UVU POLICE WOULD NOT cover that staircase. Why didn’t UVU ask for police assistance from Orem PD who are ALLOWED TO FLY DRONES?

Johnny St.Pete

77,483 views • 8 months ago

$🚨 MUST WATCH: Why Tyler Robinson CANNOT Be the Man in the FBI Suspect Photo— The "Attached Earlobe" Detail That DESTROYS the State's Case. 😱 The authorities point their finger to a grainy stairwell photo of the suspect and tell you, with absolute certainty, that this is Tyler Robinson. But if you zoom in—if you just look closely at the side of his head—the story begins to fracture. The man in that grainy photograph has distinctly unattached earlobes. Now, pull up a photo of Tyler Robinson. His earlobes are attached. Biology is a stubborn thing. It doesn’t bend to the will of a press conference. It is anatomically impossible for Tyler to be the man in that photo. Now, look down at the feet. The suspect is wearing solid gray shoes with no stripes. We know for a fact that Tyler Robinson practically lived in his black Chuck Taylors, complete with their distinct white stripe. So whose gray shoes are walking around in that suspect photo? We didn't have to look far. We found them. They belong to Tyler's roommate. His boyfriend. Lance Twiggs. But we don't have to just trust our lying eyes. We can trust the math. When you run the FBI’s suspect photo through an advanced AI facial recognition system, plotting it against both Tyler and Lance, you don't get a guess. You get a mathematical certainty. Comparing six fixed anatomical landmarks—from the curve of the jawline to the width of the nose bridge—the results don't just whisper; they scream. Lance Twiggs comes back as a six-out-of-six, perfect anatomical match. Tyler Robinson matches absolutely zero. So, ask yourself a simple question: Who actually knew how to handle a rifle? If you ask Tyler’s grandmother, she’ll tell you he wasn’t a gun guy. He had zero experience behind a scope. Lance Twiggs, on the other hand, grew up hunting with his grandfather. To Lance, a 300-yard shot wasn’t some impossible sniper's miracle; it was just a weekend hobby. And it gets darker. If you open Lance’s personal notebooks, you don't find grocery lists. You find unhinged, creeping scribbles. Scribbles that, under forensic scrutiny, perfectly match the unique, distinct etchings found on the bullet casings left behind at the crime scene. But here is the detail that should make the hair on the back of your neck stand up. On September 6th—exactly four days before Charlie Kirk was assassinated—Lance Twiggs logged into his gaming account and changed his digital handle. What did he change it to? "Homicidal Maniac 962025" September 6th, 2025. Four days before the hit. Are we really supposed to look the other way and call that a coincidence? So how did Tyler take the fall? Let's look at the digital crime scene. Lance had total, unrestricted access to all of Tyler’s devices. It takes about thirty seconds to fabricate a text message exchange to build a digital alibi. And when the police came knocking, what did Lance hand them? He claimed Tyler left a confession note tucked under his desk, begging Lance to destroy it. And Lance, playing the ever-helpful roommate, supposedly did destroy it—but not before taking a highly convenient, perfectly framed photograph to hand to the authorities. A neatly packaged suspect. A perfect patsy. The state is asking you to suspend your disbelief. They want you to accept attached earlobes on an unattached suspect. They want you to ignore the gray shoes, the 6-for-6 AI facial match, the hunting background, the bullet etchings, and the "Homicidal Maniac" gaming tag. But when you lay all the pieces on the mahogany desk, it doesn’t spell Tyler Robinson. It spells a frame-job. And we aren't going to stop asking questions until the whole board is flipped. From: 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 FOLLOW Him!$

🚨 MUST WATCH: Why Tyler Robinson CANNOT Be the Man in the FBI Suspect Photo— The "Attached Earlobe" Detail That DESTROYS the State's Case. 😱 The authorities point their finger to a grainy stairwell photo of the suspect and tell you, with absolute certainty, that this is Tyler Robinson. But if you zoom in—if you just look closely at the side of his head—the story begins to fracture. The man in that grainy photograph has distinctly unattached earlobes. Now, pull up a photo of Tyler Robinson. His earlobes are attached. Biology is a stubborn thing. It doesn’t bend to the will of a press conference. It is anatomically impossible for Tyler to be the man in that photo. Now, look down at the feet. The suspect is wearing solid gray shoes with no stripes. We know for a fact that Tyler Robinson practically lived in his black Chuck Taylors, complete with their distinct white stripe. So whose gray shoes are walking around in that suspect photo? We didn't have to look far. We found them. They belong to Tyler's roommate. His boyfriend. Lance Twiggs. But we don't have to just trust our lying eyes. We can trust the math. When you run the FBI’s suspect photo through an advanced AI facial recognition system, plotting it against both Tyler and Lance, you don't get a guess. You get a mathematical certainty. Comparing six fixed anatomical landmarks—from the curve of the jawline to the width of the nose bridge—the results don't just whisper; they scream. Lance Twiggs comes back as a six-out-of-six, perfect anatomical match. Tyler Robinson matches absolutely zero. So, ask yourself a simple question: Who actually knew how to handle a rifle? If you ask Tyler’s grandmother, she’ll tell you he wasn’t a gun guy. He had zero experience behind a scope. Lance Twiggs, on the other hand, grew up hunting with his grandfather. To Lance, a 300-yard shot wasn’t some impossible sniper's miracle; it was just a weekend hobby. And it gets darker. If you open Lance’s personal notebooks, you don't find grocery lists. You find unhinged, creeping scribbles. Scribbles that, under forensic scrutiny, perfectly match the unique, distinct etchings found on the bullet casings left behind at the crime scene. But here is the detail that should make the hair on the back of your neck stand up. On September 6th—exactly four days before Charlie Kirk was assassinated—Lance Twiggs logged into his gaming account and changed his digital handle. What did he change it to? "Homicidal Maniac 962025" September 6th, 2025. Four days before the hit. Are we really supposed to look the other way and call that a coincidence? So how did Tyler take the fall? Let's look at the digital crime scene. Lance had total, unrestricted access to all of Tyler’s devices. It takes about thirty seconds to fabricate a text message exchange to build a digital alibi. And when the police came knocking, what did Lance hand them? He claimed Tyler left a confession note tucked under his desk, begging Lance to destroy it. And Lance, playing the ever-helpful roommate, supposedly did destroy it—but not before taking a highly convenient, perfectly framed photograph to hand to the authorities. A neatly packaged suspect. A perfect patsy. The state is asking you to suspend your disbelief. They want you to accept attached earlobes on an unattached suspect. They want you to ignore the gray shoes, the 6-for-6 AI facial match, the hunting background, the bullet etchings, and the "Homicidal Maniac" gaming tag. But when you lay all the pieces on the mahogany desk, it doesn’t spell Tyler Robinson. It spells a frame-job. And we aren't going to stop asking questions until the whole board is flipped. From: 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 FOLLOW Him!

Project Constitution

46,409 views • 3 months ago

The Testimony of Transgender Lover of Charlie Kirk’s Murderer, Lance Twiggs, Was Just Played LIVE In Court. Here is what we learned: -Tyler Robinson ADMITTED to Twiggs that he killed Charlie Kirk, said “I wish I hadn’t done it,” began crying, and eventually stated he would go to his parents’ house or turn himself in. -Twiggs testified that Robinson left around 4 a.m. on the 10th to “work” and left a note on Robinson’s keyboard. -Twiggs says Tyler mentioned engraving bullets to him. -Text messages show Robinson further admitted his guilt. -Texts confirm Robinson was waiting near UVU to retrieve the rifle after police left the scene. - Texts confirm Robinson wrote: “some hate can’t be extinguished out.” This trial is OVER.

The Testimony of Transgender Lover of Charlie Kirk’s Murderer, Lance Twiggs, Was Just Played LIVE In Court. Here is what we learned: -Tyler Robinson ADMITTED to Twiggs that he killed Charlie Kirk, said “I wish I hadn’t done it,” began crying, and eventually stated he would go to his parents’ house or turn himself in. -Twiggs testified that Robinson left around 4 a.m. on the 10th to “work” and left a note on Robinson’s keyboard. -Twiggs says Tyler mentioned engraving bullets to him. -Text messages show Robinson further admitted his guilt. -Texts confirm Robinson was waiting near UVU to retrieve the rifle after police left the scene. - Texts confirm Robinson wrote: “some hate can’t be extinguished out.” This trial is OVER.

Benny Johnson

383,599 views • 7 days ago

Here is the clip with the transcript. What Peter says is clear: text messages including “pin it on the girl” were from “people inside the house” and from cops or related to the cops.” When The Megyn Kelly Show asks him “Oh, well, that sounds really bad. I actually hadn’t realized that there were EXPLICIT text messages saying, “We’re going to pin it on the girl.” That’s from cops?” Tragos didn’t clarify it was an interpretation of the messages, he clearly confirmed that the text message was “That's from the people inside the house. From people inside the house, inside 34 Fairview. Some of them are cops or related to cops.”

Here is the clip with the transcript. What Peter says is clear: text messages including “pin it on the girl” were from “people inside the house” and from cops or related to the cops.” When The Megyn Kelly Show asks him “Oh, well, that sounds really bad. I actually hadn’t realized that there were EXPLICIT text messages saying, “We’re going to pin it on the girl.” That’s from cops?” Tragos didn’t clarify it was an interpretation of the messages, he clearly confirmed that the text message was “That's from the people inside the house. From people inside the house, inside 34 Fairview. Some of them are cops or related to cops.”

Autumn 🍂❄️

35,748 views • 2 months ago

🚨 THOUGHT EXPERIMENT: What if Tyler and Lance’s Roles Were ACTUALLY Reversed? What if Tyler Robinson is the one who turned someone in, not Lance? Looking at these screenshots that were released, there’s some very sloppy editing going on. Multiple photos show heavy blurring on hands, floors, trim, and clothing — almost like someone was trying to hide the background or who was actually in the room. Even more interesting: the trim, flooring, and wall colors in some of these “Lance” photos match the exact interrogation room where Tyler was being questioned. And in one of the images, you can clearly see what looks like Tyler’s shoe that they tried (and failed) to blur out. It’s starting to look like these photos were taken in the same room, with Tyler being the one showing the messages. The “blurry hand” and photoshopped background in several shots only make it more suspicious. What if the narrative we’ve been fed is backwards? What if Tyler Robinson is the one who flipped… and they’ve been editing the evidence to make it look like it was Lance?

🚨 THOUGHT EXPERIMENT: What if Tyler and Lance’s Roles Were ACTUALLY Reversed? What if Tyler Robinson is the one who turned someone in, not Lance? Looking at these screenshots that were released, there’s some very sloppy editing going on. Multiple photos show heavy blurring on hands, floors, trim, and clothing — almost like someone was trying to hide the background or who was actually in the room. Even more interesting: the trim, flooring, and wall colors in some of these “Lance” photos match the exact interrogation room where Tyler was being questioned. And in one of the images, you can clearly see what looks like Tyler’s shoe that they tried (and failed) to blur out. It’s starting to look like these photos were taken in the same room, with Tyler being the one showing the messages. The “blurry hand” and photoshopped background in several shots only make it more suspicious. What if the narrative we’ve been fed is backwards? What if Tyler Robinson is the one who flipped… and they’ve been editing the evidence to make it look like it was Lance?

Project Constitution

52,330 views • 3 days ago

Just Facts: The Discord message from Tyler Robinson was sent at 7:57 p.m. MT on Sep 11. That’s even before a call to Nate Brooksby. Tyler was not in custody, and it was a full hour before his parents took him to the WCSO. The screenshot going around says 8:57 p.m. but does not indicate a timezone. No one had a clue where or from whom that screenshot came, but now we know it came from a phone in the Central Time zone. Luckily, the Turkey Tom videos captured the timezone. If you haven’t watched the Turkey Tom videos on Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs, you are missing key information regarding this case. His video specifically on the Discord chats is linked below. For the full picture, I recommend watching it.

Just Facts: The Discord message from Tyler Robinson was sent at 7:57 p.m. MT on Sep 11. That’s even before a call to Nate Brooksby. Tyler was not in custody, and it was a full hour before his parents took him to the WCSO. The screenshot going around says 8:57 p.m. but does not indicate a timezone. No one had a clue where or from whom that screenshot came, but now we know it came from a phone in the Central Time zone. Luckily, the Turkey Tom videos captured the timezone. If you haven’t watched the Turkey Tom videos on Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs, you are missing key information regarding this case. His video specifically on the Discord chats is linked below. For the full picture, I recommend watching it.

Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

19,681 views • 2 months ago

Erika Kirk says Candace Owens is lying — Charlie did not text anyone the day before he was murdered saying, “They’re going to Kill me.” She says she knows because she has his phone. 🔻 Context: Frank Turek said a few times, in the months leading up to Charlie’s murder, he told Charlie he hopes he increased his security — Charlie responded, “I have. They want me dead.” Frank said he didn’t know who he meant by “They”. Frank assumed he just meant leftists. These text messages of course aren’t from the day before… but provide context that maybe Charlie was in that state of mind due to all the pressure he was under. Candace claims a few individuals received text messages from Charlie the night before claiming “they’re going to kill me”, allegedly that he sent during a call he had with certain people. She says they’ve asked her not to share those messages. Candace encouraged them to come forward. As of right now, I’m inclined to believe Erika unless something gets released. Erika Frank Clip 1 Frank Clip 2

Erika Kirk says Candace Owens is lying — Charlie did not text anyone the day before he was murdered saying, “They’re going to Kill me.” She says she knows because she has his phone. 🔻 Context: Frank Turek said a few times, in the months leading up to Charlie’s murder, he told Charlie he hopes he increased his security — Charlie responded, “I have. They want me dead.” Frank said he didn’t know who he meant by “They”. Frank assumed he just meant leftists. These text messages of course aren’t from the day before… but provide context that maybe Charlie was in that state of mind due to all the pressure he was under. Candace claims a few individuals received text messages from Charlie the night before claiming “they’re going to kill me”, allegedly that he sent during a call he had with certain people. She says they’ve asked her not to share those messages. Candace encouraged them to come forward. As of right now, I’m inclined to believe Erika unless something gets released. Erika Frank Clip 1 Frank Clip 2

MJTruthUltra

973,982 views • 7 months ago

With the recent defamation lawsuit filed by members of the McCabe/Albert group, there’s now a lot of focus on what people have said publicly. But to understand why people have been asking questions over the past 3 years… you have to go back to the testimony and the timeline itself. Colin says he was at Mike Leonetti’s house and admits he doesn’t remember how he got there but remembers he was drinking Bud Lights So right off the bat we have memory gaps about how his night even started. He testifies that Allie McCabe picked him up and brought him to Fairview between 10:30–11:00 PM From the actual texts when Colin wanted a ride home at 11:54 Colin texts Allie “U can get me now. If easier”, At 11:55 PM She responds and at 12:10 AM She texts “here” Now from Allie’s testimony, She says she had Avery and Danielle in the car, dropped them off, Then went to another friend’s house, Then came back to pick Colin up. All between 11:54 PM and 12:10 AM. Where exactly was she when she got the text? She says she doesn’t really remember What route did she take to Fairview? She doesn’t remember Where did she park? “I believe the driveway… not entirely sure” How long between “here” and Colin coming out? “A few minutes” Meanwhile, Colin’s Version of That Same Moment He Says after getting the “here” text, he came out in about 30 seconds to a minute,Says he exited through the side door near the garage, Says he saw uncle Brian Albert and Auntie Nicole Albert but Nicole Albert Says she came in the front door and bumped into Colin and that He told her he was leaving because his ride was coming. Meanwhile, Brian Albert Says he came in the side door and that Colin was the kitchen no more than 5 minutes and that he went to the bathroom and when he came out, Colin was gone Allie says She drove him straight home, No stops, About a 5-minute drive, BUT, She can’t recall the route Colin says His parents were already in bed, He went upstairs to say goodnight But We know his father didn’t leave the bar until 12:14 AM The only hard evidence presented for this timeline is A screenshot of text messages Everything else? Testimony, Memory, Recollection When you have a witness who doesn’t remember how the night started, a tight timeline with multiple stops compressed into minutes, conflicting recollections about movements and timing, and limited physical evidence to anchor it all, is it unreasonable for people to ask questions? This isn’t about claiming what happened. It’s about acknowledging what doesn’t clearly make sense yet.

With the recent defamation lawsuit filed by members of the McCabe/Albert group, there’s now a lot of focus on what people have said publicly. But to understand why people have been asking questions over the past 3 years… you have to go back to the testimony and the timeline itself. Colin says he was at Mike Leonetti’s house and admits he doesn’t remember how he got there but remembers he was drinking Bud Lights So right off the bat we have memory gaps about how his night even started. He testifies that Allie McCabe picked him up and brought him to Fairview between 10:30–11:00 PM From the actual texts when Colin wanted a ride home at 11:54 Colin texts Allie “U can get me now. If easier”, At 11:55 PM She responds and at 12:10 AM She texts “here” Now from Allie’s testimony, She says she had Avery and Danielle in the car, dropped them off, Then went to another friend’s house, Then came back to pick Colin up. All between 11:54 PM and 12:10 AM. Where exactly was she when she got the text? She says she doesn’t really remember What route did she take to Fairview? She doesn’t remember Where did she park? “I believe the driveway… not entirely sure” How long between “here” and Colin coming out? “A few minutes” Meanwhile, Colin’s Version of That Same Moment He Says after getting the “here” text, he came out in about 30 seconds to a minute,Says he exited through the side door near the garage, Says he saw uncle Brian Albert and Auntie Nicole Albert but Nicole Albert Says she came in the front door and bumped into Colin and that He told her he was leaving because his ride was coming. Meanwhile, Brian Albert Says he came in the side door and that Colin was the kitchen no more than 5 minutes and that he went to the bathroom and when he came out, Colin was gone Allie says She drove him straight home, No stops, About a 5-minute drive, BUT, She can’t recall the route Colin says His parents were already in bed, He went upstairs to say goodnight But We know his father didn’t leave the bar until 12:14 AM The only hard evidence presented for this timeline is A screenshot of text messages Everything else? Testimony, Memory, Recollection When you have a witness who doesn’t remember how the night started, a tight timeline with multiple stops compressed into minutes, conflicting recollections about movements and timing, and limited physical evidence to anchor it all, is it unreasonable for people to ask questions? This isn’t about claiming what happened. It’s about acknowledging what doesn’t clearly make sense yet.

Dixie Normus

30,553 views • 2 months ago